The Fourteenth Amendment and equal protection | US government and civics | Khan Academy
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 2 ต.ค. 2024
- The Fourteenth and equal protection.
View more lessons or practice this subject at www.khanacadem...
Khan Academy is a nonprofit organization with the mission of providing a free, world-class education for anyone, anywhere. We offer quizzes, questions, instructional videos, and articles on a range of academic subjects, including math, biology, chemistry, physics, history, economics, finance, grammar, preschool learning, and more. We provide teachers with tools and data so they can help their students develop the skills, habits, and mindsets for success in school and beyond. Khan Academy has been translated into dozens of languages, and 15 million people around the globe learn on Khan Academy every month. As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, we would love your help! Donate or volunteer today!
Donate here: www.khanacadem...
Volunteer here: www.khanacadem...
Thank you for the video i need to study some of this section for law classes
To be honest I watch your videos only those which are of my concern . You go into the root cause of the problem which i really like about you I have a problem which think I should share with you . I hope you'll help .While calculating mode why do sometimes highest frequency is not a modal value . And in continuous series why importance is given to the previous frequency and the next frequency to the modal frequency in formula. I Google it too but didn't find the answer
The first part about citizenship was also an important shift that we don't think much about today. Well, not so much a shift as settling an argument. Did the states have the power to determine who had "state" citizenship and who did not? This subtle distinction had been a backdoor attempt to maintain many parts of slavery by simply saying former slaves, while free and perhaps citizens of the United States, were not "citizens" of their local State and thus couldn't vote, own property, run for office etc. under the states laws. The 14th Amendment says no, all of a states residents are "citzens" of that state.
As a resident of Arizona and a U.S. Citizen, once a former offender or convicted Felon has been treated UNEQUALLY for years, even after my Civil Rights were Ordered to be Restored by the court in 2014.. in 2017 they took my kids in juvenile court and I was hired to be fired in 2019 by the City Bus Company , here in Phoenix, AZ.. Unequal Treatment and Unconstitutional treatment takes it toll on a American Citizen's Mental Health and their Mind Set... Unless you've been convicted of a felony and endured this same treatment, you'll never really be able to Empathize with what I've lived through. Next time they are going to have to take my life from me, before they just Violate my Rights again. Give me liberty or give me death. There could be a book, or a movie, about what I've lived through, just like LOVING V VIRGINIA....
Nice this 4 minute and 47 second video help me educate myself further on a constitution I love watching the police audit videos and I'm very much into learning the law and I also realize you don't have to be a lawyer to know the law
not even most lawyers are good at learning law. everyone though shoyld learn it. its valuable stuff like a sword and shield through life.
The constitution admitted there was a nation that already existed here with their own laws and they wouldn't be subjected to their jurisdiction, the indigenous people of Latin America are of the same nation as USA native Americans, a nation is defined as a group of people of same ethnicity culture and history, indigenous people of north and south America are one nation, same DNA ethnicity culture and history, one could argue that the indigenous brown people of Latin America are not subjects of the colonizers jurisdiction and the constitution originally said the natives of north America would not be harrassed at borders or be denied the right to migrate.
0:59 Not to aggressively, thru decades of built up rage from being deliberately denied my human rights at a bare minimum thru the denied crime of gangstalking psychological violence/life-vandalism crimes (overarchingly against humanity in scope, breadth, and "creativity"), but PLEASE. AFTER A CERTAIN POINT, THERE IS NO RETURN, AND THAT IS EXACTLY WHY THEY HOUND YOU AT YOUR LIFE'S EXPENSE. IT IS POINTLESS TO LIE ABOUT THIS REALITY.
🙏🙏🙏Thank God my chains are gone. I am greatful to understand that I will always work hard and respect my freedom. I am a natural born citizen and I am greatful to understand that I will never be chained up in a prison
Just compelling absent members under section 1 article 5 clause 1 per corum blood all abridged and everything. Nah. Knowing you can't...
🌎🙏🙏🙏✝️ Attorney rights preliminary hearing rights speedy trial rights violated. A right to hire and fire a Attorney. A Writ of habeas corpus should have never been suspended.
What are the other sections?
2001 illegal wire taps. No warnt on wire taps. 2016 Due process violation. Entrapment. No warnt
Puerto Rico is the exception to the Rule. This ruling is the result of the Supreme Courts Reliance on antebellum legal precedent governing Slavery and emancipated peoples challenging ownership, cross state divisions & boundaries and the laws of property and ownership combined with expansionism. The ideology of Equal in an Unequal sense means
Puertoricans in Puerto Rico are citizens by Legislation, The US Constitution doesn’t follow the US flag so Puertoricans don’t enjoy the rights and privileges afforded by the Constitution but are obligated to indulge in all the responsibilities with no voice or legal ability to challenge the USA’s policies, corporations or businesses
🌏🙏🙏🙏 A violation of my constitution rights 2016. A violation of my constitution right
2001 illegal wire taps. 2016 Due process violation. 🙏 🙏🙏
Have the republicons heard this?!
Funny how it was the democrats that had segregated, not the Republicans lol
So how do states collect income tax without due process? Isn't that taking property?
Also, when the states decide grocery stores are essential but gyms are not is that equal protection?
Income tax used to be illegal.
@@nd-mr7om What changed it?
@@nikkola33 constitutional amendment. I think when they setup the federal reserve. Although it may have been a decade or 2 prior (im too lazy to google it, you can if youre interested)
@@nd-mr7om yeah I will, I was at work so not much time to. Ha
@@nikkola33 wanna know the secrets of the constitution???
I was born in the United States and I was deprived my rights. Thank God my chains are gone. I am greatful to understand that I have a job and I am never looking back. Thank God my chains are gone. I don't have to look back. I am born in the United States. I am greatful to understand that I don't have to look back. Thank God for the cross
the playlist of series?
We should have no homeless problem in our at-will employment States due to unequal protection of our own at-will employment laws for unemployment compensation.
What happen with the Dred Scott case
what about the other 4 sections?
Does the Fourteenth Ammendment prohibit police officers calling businesses to report a "Bomb Threat" so that everyone inside can be detained and the building searched for drugs? Does the Fourteenth Ammendment prohibit police officers from standing outside your business asking your patrons if they sold all their drugs? No drugs were ever found. The police were working for business competitors. Does the 14th Ammendment mean that police must respond to all calls equally?
"Persons"...
Did the 14th Amendment apply to WOMEN persons?
It's considered void. You carry on liken it's a legal document.
What is due process? I am already interested in the next video.
It’s over now
It clearly says ALL PERSONS BORN. So how I interpret this is if your not born yet then you don’t have rights. If you are not a separate entity then you don’t have rights to life.
It doesn't say if you're not born though, you don't have these rights. But there's also nothing in the Constitution that says the unborn have any rights.
@@777Skeptic What’s the first 3 words?
@@dperr338 "All persons born," but it doesn't say anything either way about unborn persons.
P --> Q
does not mean
~P --> ~Q
@@777Skeptic If it specifically states all person’s born then that would mean unborn doesn’t apply…. Why? People according to this unborn is not a person.
@@dperr338 You're making a classic textbook fallacy called "denying the antecedent." It seems Khan Academy has a few courses on logic, but they seem to be more computer and math based, not a full playlist that covers what's covered in a college logic course.
Let's step away from the Constitution for simplicity and look at the statement "If it rains (P), the road will be wet (Q)."
This can be written as P --> Q.
It does NOT follow that if it doesn't rain (not-P), then the road is not wet (not-Q). There are other reasons the road can be wet, such as a tsunami, a flood, or even a dog peeing.
So it's a fallacy to say
P --> Q
therefore
~P -> ~Q
The Constitution says all born or naturalized persons (P) have a certain attribute, but says nothing either way of unborn people (~P).
However, this is (or should be) functionally moot. As the 14th amendment SHOULD, despite the mental gymnastics by SCOTUS judges, give you the right to privacy over your own body, and prohibit the government of depriving you of your liberty to seek medical care including an abortion.
This isn't the first time SCOTUS judges were blatantly wrong.
- Salinas v Texas did some mental gymnastics which eroded our 5th amendment right to remain silent
- DUI checkpoints are obviously unconstitutional and at least 1 judge conceded it was unconstitutional but ruled in favor because of the "potential to save lives."
- Internment camps were ruled Constitutional even though they blatantly contradict the due process clause of 14th amendment.
Overturning Roe v Wade is also an erosion of our rights, it goes beyond just abortions and violates our autonomy, liberty, and privacy.
END MANDATORY SEATBELT USE for consenting adults!
Holy cow, set your sights higher than that. Seatbelting protects, not harms. I grew up without one too, but that partic one goes beyond what could be called "insurance company tyranny", that like 3 in 10,000 peops can fall & bonk their head sort of ruling guidelining that gets concretized into law. That whole thing is a murky mess, tho
sir, seatbelts actually protect us, not harm
u won’t be saying that when ur sitting brain dead in the hospital and ur family pulls the plug because ur useless
I really like that 14th Amendment. :)
This amendment wasn't ratified lawfully (congressional record volume 113-part 12 june 12, 1967, to june 20, 1967 pages 15309 to 16558), there's also proof of this in State congressional records also, which nullifies it and makes anything thereafter null & void also according to 16A Am. Jur. 2d Constitutional Law § 195. This amendment was instituted by force! This was essentially when the Bankers, although they were at it long before this, hijacked the Republic & ushered in an unconstitutional Democracy operating in defacto status ever since.
Lmao ok
@@franzferdinand9690 Jokes on you.
@@AnthonyWrightCEO why is that
@@franzferdinand9690 Cause it ain't on me. I have no affiliation to the link provided yet it gives you insight on the history & the laws in relation to the events. In short it was a hostile takeover. This information is known and on record in State & Federal congressional records.
lpar.org/the-unlawful-14th-amendment/
They were so smart when they did this
After listening to the video and reading the comments I thought the following needed to be said.The US Constitution is always about the individuals rights and protection from the states or federal government not from other citizens. We should never look to the government (state or federal) to inforce the Constitution because they are enemies of the Constitution, because it limits there power. No government or bureaucrat likes to have their powers limited. If you allow them to take or erode our rights you will have to fight to get them back and the fighting will not be done with a pen.
Questions:
1. (And right up front I am not suggesting that this is how I believe it should be): But, other than the age to vote and the age to hold certain public offices, are ALL other age related laws unconstitutional? The Constitution gives certain rights to a person born in the USA, how could any other age related law override the Constitution? No where in the Constitution does it stipulate that an American citizen has to be of a certain mental state or maturity to acquire and exercise their rights under the Constitution. Now, here again, I am not suggesting that we should do away with the laws that help protect and also punish the American citizens that society deems is a child, but technically, aren't all those laws unconstitutional?
Do we need a specific Constitutional Amendment to address the age of children, to limit their American rights given to them at birth or citizenship? And without such an Amendment, is society violating the Constitutional rights of American citizens on a daily basis that society deems is a child?
2. Does an American citizen have an inherent right to end their own life? It's their very own life, don't they have a right to end it if they and they alone choose to do so for whatever reason they may have? Are basically all laws against suicide and euthanasia unconstitutional?
regarding your second question: citizens have the liberty of ending their own lives. The government has to take active measures in protecting rights not liberties. I know this applies in the european system not sure if it's the same in the U.S.
🌎🙏🙏🙏 Thank you
Abortion Laws?
Thank you
but section 2,3,4,5?
Huh but it's still perfectly legal to discriminate against gays
It isnt
Yet they do..
Still.
Judy Squyres they have freedom of association
Unborn human beings are protected by this amendment which makes me ashamed of the state of our union during recent decades of bloodshed. In decades to come our future generations will look back on us and wag their heads at the selfish destruction of the innocent.
More than that, Jesus is Lord and calls all to repent, believe, and obey the gospel. Teach one another to obey the one and only King of all the earth.
Well roe vs wade just got overturned so that's something
You can’t just pick what words you want to ignore. Clearly in this context you are not a citizen until you are born.
@@dperr338 you can’t just choose which humans to ignore based on size, age, and/or location. Life is a gift from God and no one has the authority to end a life but God himself.
Our rights come from God alone. “Endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights.”
@@dperr338 It's important to define the word born and use that definition according to when this amendment was passed. The actual definition and the one used amid the 1800's is "to be produced or brought into life". The birth we think of now is coined from its genesis.
Good video mang
Thank you
does this mean Americans are free?
yes
File a UCC-1 for ownership of your birth certificate...
Not free to "choose" apparently!
These poor democrats have been violating the 14th amendment since 1896. Dang.
How?
@@dperr338 Democrats ruled the south from 1876 to 1948. They loved Plessy vs Ferguson because they could segregate their society. "Separate but equal" but it violates the equal protection clause.
Second
14th amendment not ratified
The Fourteenth Amendment ratified in 1868 granted citizenship to former slaves and their descendants being under the "jurisdiction" of the U.S. and state of birth if born in America, as they were being persecuted and murdered during Reconstruction, thus granting them equal rights and protections under American constitutional law as White citizens, theoretically. This made it illegal to capture or to kidnap or to torture or to murder former slaves and clearly implied that offenders would be brought to justice according to the law. And it overturned a previous ruling by the Supreme Court that Blacks could not be American citizens.
It does not grant citizenship to those not under the "jurisdiction" of the U.S. and state. Note the parenthetical clause: "..., and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, ...." The children of illegal aliens and illegal immigrants and tourists visiting America, even if born in the United States, are not under the "jurisdiction" of the U.S. but under the "jurisdiction" of the parent's legal country and therefore not citizens of the U.S.
All three Reconstruction Amendments were ratified to address and specifically defined constitutional rights of former slaves and their children and their descendants. These Amendments, 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, granted to Black people, under the "jurisdiction" of the U.S. and state, freed or born within U.S. and under U.S. "jurisdiction," emancipation from slavery, citizenship (with all the rights and protections under the law just as free White citizens), and voting rights as a whole person (as slaves had been defined as three fifths a person as far as constitutional required representation in the House of Representatives). Note that having more representatives in Washington pleased the South during the Reconstruction period.
_______________________________________________
CONCLUSION:
"..., and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, ...." U.S. born children of illegals (sneaking across the border or lying about "asylum" since they are economically motivated) and tourists from communist China etc are not under U.S. "jurisdiction" and therefore not legally American citizens. Illegals (with felony crimes, SSN/identity fraud, education and healthcare requirements etc, taking jobs that would otherwise employ Americans etc) cost roughly a trillion dollars ($1000-billion) every decade for several decades now to American federal taxpayers. America has a moral responsibility to aid poor countries (and does) but not to accept endless millions of illegals, as their is no end to it that attracts endless millions to overpopulate America that is not sustainable with unenforced immigration laws that require legal deportations. Many of their children grow up to vote for America to become an open border (attracting crime and disease etc), progressive socialist dystopia instead of to continue being a wealthy democratic republic with freedom and capitalism etc.
Thanks, this will come in handy for me!
"Many of their children grow up to vote for America to become an open border (attracting crime and disease etc), progressive socialist dystopia instead of to continue being a wealthy democratic republic with freedom and capitalism etc." Do you know how stupid you sound? Very stupid. Where did you get this idea that those children are growing up to vote that way? It seems that you're just spewing nonsense. If we're going by what you're saying, that children of illegal immigrants should not be U.S. citizens, shouldn't the descendants of, let's say, the Irish not be citizens? By your logic, they shouldn't be even if they were born here.
You got that all wrong