very helpful and right to the point!! I've been messing with both of these for some years but applying them to very modern pop and rock settings. Your explanations and demo give some insight into how they sounded a long time ago. Thanks!!!
Super interesting and useful video! I wonder where did you get this analysis? since Im sure both roman number chord analysis as well as the functional harmony they represent did not existed back in renaissance.
Glad you liked it! So modern musical analysis is descriptive rather than prescriptive so it only explains what already exists which is why different musical theories are developed for different genres and periods.
Notes to self: In "C" : Romanesca Variation: Ground bass: C G A E G G A E A In chords: C G Am E C G Am E A Using numbers: Thinking of it in Am: Bass line: b3 b7 1 5 b3 b7 1 5 1 Thinking of it in C: 1 5 6 3 1 5 6 3 1 Example: ----------------------------------------------
I am so confused, the chord intervals you were playing to my ear were not corresponding to what was written on the whiteboard. I went to go check on my keyboard and tried played it in the same key as you too just to be sure my ear wasn't fucking with me. What am I missing?
Sorry just figured out you were inverting them! Confused the shit out of me for a second. Thanks for the lesson anyhow, can't find anything else on this topic on youtube in this format.
How bout
The Folia?My fave.
Come back to youtube!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
very helpful and right to the point!! I've been messing with both of these for some years but applying them to very modern pop and rock settings. Your explanations and demo give some insight into how they sounded a long time ago. Thanks!!!
Thanks, so glad you found it useful!
Great video!
Hey thanx so much for making this, super helpful
This is great! Thanks
You're welcome, and thanks!
Oh You made it! I'm so happy :) Thank You so so much.
Phacias You are welcome!
gold
Kha'al Amen Thanks glad you enjoyed it!
+Michael Staff I second that.
Super interesting and useful video! I wonder where did you get this analysis? since Im sure both roman number chord analysis as well as the functional harmony they represent did not existed back in renaissance.
Glad you liked it! So modern musical analysis is descriptive rather than prescriptive so it only explains what already exists which is why different musical theories are developed for different genres and periods.
Can you recommend a good book if you want to learn more about this? i find it quite hard too follow when i dont know the inversion. thx :)
Notes to self: In "C" :
Romanesca Variation:
Ground bass:
C G A E
G G A E A
In chords:
C G Am E
C G Am E A
Using numbers: Thinking of it in Am:
Bass line:
b3 b7 1 5
b3 b7 1 5 1
Thinking of it in C:
1 5 6 3
1 5 6 3 1
Example:
----------------------------------------------
I've always enjoyed i-VII-VI-i.
I am so confused, the chord intervals you were playing to my ear were not corresponding to what was written on the whiteboard. I went to go check on my keyboard and tried played it in the same key as you too just to be sure my ear wasn't fucking with me. What am I missing?
Sorry just figured out you were inverting them! Confused the shit out of me for a second. Thanks for the lesson anyhow, can't find anything else on this topic on youtube in this format.
Matthew Foy you're welcome and glad you figured it out!
I hear some very dust in the wind esq melodies in there.
Yes I've heard that observation from others as well
great stuff, thanks! just one thing, it’s said antiiico, anteeco, the accent is in the second syllable :)
fcouperin thanks, glad you enjoyed it! and thank you for the correction too :)
Harmonic progressions stem from renaissance
(Most of the) Rythms stems from Slave Work Songs
wrong.
How bout the Folia? My fave