Kingdom of Heaven (2005) MOVIE REACTION! FIRST TIME WATCHING!!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 20 มิ.ย. 2021
- Tom loves the movie Kingdom of Heaven but wanted to watch and show me the Directors cut! Does Shaun think its as good as Tom thinks? watch to find out!!
MERCH: ► cinema-rules.creator-spring.com
CONSIDER SUBSCRIBING ► / cinemarules
SUPPORT: ► / cinemarules
FOLLOW ►
Instagram: / cinema_rules
Sub-Reddit: / cinemarules
TikTok: / cinema_rules
Twitter: / cinemarules - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
There are narrations of how respected Salahuddin was.
In Saladin’s possession at the time of his death were one piece of gold and forty pieces of silver. He had given away his great wealth to his poor subjects, leaving nothing to pay for his funeral
It is said that he was buried with his sword so that when God All Mighty resurrects him, it will be a sign for him as a just king.
Wow
Most kings and knights are buried with their personal belongings to be taken with them to the afterlife.
@@koreancowboy42 Do Abrahamic religions believe that? I thought that was more of a pagan thing (e.g. coins for the ferryman in Greece, all the stuff Pharaohs were buried with, weapons and even slaves for the Norse).
@@Elydir we don't believe in that lmao, no kind of materialistic bs could do any good in the day of judgement
@@Elydir didn't say that Abrahamc religions, however movies and films and history lots of depictions and so on kings or knights usually buried with personal belongings or their own wealth.
This directors cut is the version that should have been in theaters. That is the version that actually turns a mediocre movie into a masterpiece.
I watched this movie for the first time as the theatrical version, and I simply didn't like the movie. A friend had to convince me to watch it again, but watch the director's cut instead. I didn't really want to, to be honest. But once I did, it was like DAMN! Suddenly, I really liked the movie. Now I'd say it's a great movie. Such a massive difference between the cuts - probably the largest difference of any movie.
loved the directors cut, such a great movie.
So true! I had the theatrical release DVD for so long and only got the director’s cut a few months ago. It blew my mind at how good it was. If they had released the director’s cut originally in the theaters there is no doubt in my mind that this movie would have received multiple Oscars.
Liked director's cut so much! So religious and exactly as it must be!
@@Grnademaster Same thing happened to me. I watched it when it first came out and didn't think much of it, but just a year or two ago I heard the directors cut was really good, so I gave it a try and it blew me away. I can't believe anyone thought the theatrical cut was the better version to release.
the Salahudin actor is actually a university lecturer in Damascus. He rocked. The music was fantastic and the scene where Salahudin replaced the cross on the table, was moving.
That scene is incredible, it perfectly portrays the incredible leader he was, even for the enemies defeated by him.
I love Edward Norton, unaccredited, as King Baldwin in this, a very accurate portrayal of the king being out with the people.
Balian of Ibelin: what is Jerusalem worth?
Saladin the Benevolent: Nothing (it's just a place of stones like any other to me) ...... Everything! (It has a big symbol for the religion in it since it's a holy city)
It definitely is a holy city. Who made it holy? God!
Saladin was not benevolent. He was a conquerer.
@@MrFarnanonical nobody is perfect but he was a "Just" conqueror honoring his words of giving safe passage to the christian people who last time had their soldiers massacre and rape Muslims when Jerusalem was conquered by them. He even gave money to the common people when he had too much. He died poor but I'm sure he knew it was worth it. His men even hated him for not allowing to ransack Jerusalem so they can loot and take revenge on the Muslims who were massacred on the last conquest. What was important to him was Jerusalem because of that it had a peaceful transition not a chaotic one. Many Christians even praised him as a model leader even kings and the pope knows his good reputation.
The Hospitaler character has been thought to be an angel. Notice how he never talks to anyone except for Balian and also how he just disappears. Also pay attention to his actual lines.
Or simply God subtly guiding him.
He's actually a renegade Engineer who stayed after "Jesus" died.
he talks to other characters, mostly to Bailians father
He talks to Balians brother the priest, he talks to Balians father, he talks to his father's brother, he talks to his father's nephew, he talks to Tiberius, he talks to a ton of people. He's not an angel.
I would expand that to you he only speaks to people with Godfrey or Balian present. In this, the director's cut edition he replies to:
Godfrey's brother the lord and his nephew Jamie Lannister (my German friend is a close student of the law)
He speaks to the Marshall during Balian's introduction but he's just an observer when Guy and Marshall are arguing over whether to go to war.
Despite Historical Inaccuracies, this movie drove me to have an interest in History. I am glad y'all reacted to the Director's Cut of this movie because there are not many reactions to this amazing movie :)
Yes this movie has inaccuracies, mostly taking liberties with the people and events, but compared to 90% of the other medieval movies out there, this movie gets soo much right in terms of costuming, armor, weapons, daily life... Hell it even gets the style of glassware right.
@SLADKO4ik *are
@SLADKO4ik yeah, and the queen Sibila´s character is inaccurate, the King Balduin´s mask is an invention of the film makers, hell even the MC´s character, Bailian, is inaccurate. But as a whole, its close enough.
The real Bailen was pretty heroic, what we do know of his real life is pretty amazing, but there would be no way to make a dramatic movie out of what little we know about his personal life. He was born in Jerusalem, and was actually the stepfather of Sybilla and Baldwin (the king). The Mass knighting did happen, the conversation between him and Saladin is supposedly nearly verbatim. Raymond De Chattion was pretty much totally true to life. Saladin was pretty close to the real person as well. I am going off a few different documentaries about it so who knows for sure, but honestly this movie gets a lot more right than it gets credit for.
So funny but this was actually the same for me. I got into a lot of medieval history through this film!
Did you notice Jamie Lanister by the beginning, talking to Liam Nelson in the woods, trying to arrest Baleon for killing the priest??????
I did a minute ago and I am amazed
@@Blitzo8390 Fascinated even 🤣
@@romevo100 And Jorah Mormont showed up at the end as well
@@Blitzo8390 taking the pee now, or was he in it too? Good spot
@@romevo100 I had to look it up to make sure I wasn’t being deceived by my eyes and ears, I wasn’t wrong
"It would grab my attention and then lose it." That's medieval history for ya. Such a frustrating era. Gotta applaud the courage to try telling a compelling story about it that doesn't become pure fantasy.
Those siege towers were pure fantasy.
@@jasoncaldwell5627 Probably. The reality of a hardened siege is almost impossible to make interesting. Bunch of starving people waiting for the other side to starve faster.
@@dudermcdudeface3674 well not really, you did have assaults, the difference is they were slower. the towers would have been near the walls for a day or two before they tried climbing on the walls (the main purpose of real siege towers is to clear the walls useing archers/missile troops)
There's a popular theory that David Threwlis' character is an angel. Look into it, its really cool!
Scott confirmed in his commentary that Thewlis was playing God.
@@tigqc He's credited in the movie simply as "Hospitaler"; named for the Order he is pledged to. My theory had been that he was the spirit of John the Baptist; the patron saint of the order.
My theory about his identity was especially compelled by when you see David Thewlis' head at the foot of the cross; John the Baptist was beheaded, after all. And the way he said "My Order is with the army" - but I suppose that whether he is the spirit of the Baptist or God Himself, the statement doesn't exactly ring false.
The Hospitaliers were also known as the Knights of St John; you'll recognise their emblem (the Maltese Cross) today on ambulances almost the whole world over; it's where the word "Hospital" comes from after all. The Hospitaliers are actually still around today, the Sovereign Military Order of Malta are the present day iteration of the Order.
@@gavanhill5132 And people know Edward Norton played King Baldwin even though he wasn't listed in the credits. You're trying too hard dude.
The Hospitaler was my favorite character of them all. Him and the German
I agree...i dont see how he could be anything else...especially if you've seen the deleted scenes
.the burning bush scene for sure
I love this film. The Director's Cut is ten times better than the theatrical cut. When it first came out, the theatrical cut felt like an incomplete movie with unjustified character motivations. This version restores all of that. It feels like a better rounded story, if not an outright historical epic masterpiece.
The hospitaler is my favorite character in this film.
Yes, totally, his character is the moral compass of the film. Therefore, the question is left unanswered, is he a human or an angel? I like to think he was just a human, a very good and wise human.
@@spacemanspiff3052 I always thought he was an angel. I guess I like the idea of an angel walking amongst us like this. lol
@Matthew Goeth Thanks. It may also depend on the theatrical vs directors cut in terms of the debate, is he isn’t he an angel.
In theatrical, I believe, you don’t have that scene where the Hospitaler mysteriously disappears on Balian after the burning bush discussion, giving the impression that the Hospitaler is otherworldly.
Also, I don’t think the theatrical version had the Hospitaler discover the badly wounded Balian, after Guy’s assassin fails to kill him, and does one of those Obi Wan Kenobi healing touches on Balian. It never entered my mind that the Hospitaler was anything but a enlightened religious knight in the original release. I think Ridley Scott intentionally made the nature of the Hospitaler more ambiguous, otherworldly in the Director’s Cut. That said, you are right, he’s clearly seen dead after the battle of Battle (or massacre) of Hattin.
@Matthew Goeth Director said he was supposed to be an angel.
I really like this movie. I've never seen the extended version so this was cool.
It's neat to see why directors/editors make the choices they make in crafting a film to make the cuts they do.
It's also fun to see the dynamics between someone who has seen the film and is a fan and a first time watcher.
@Pools Closed I agree. A friend of mine wanted to see it but refused to commit to the long version so I revisited the theatrical with her and found it severely incomplete after being used to the director's cut. My friend didn't get why Eva Green was in the movie when she watched the theatrical with me and was kind of blown away when I told her what was missing. But she didn't like the theatrical enough to bother with the director's cut, so there ya go. Not her kind of thing, probably.
it's a completely different movie, easily Ridley Scott's best and a masterful film. Something I rewatch regularly. Puts the Snyder Cut to shame
I thought this was underrated when it came out (though it was definitely in the shadow of LoTR: The Two Towers), but I love the director's cut. It could use another editing pass to smooth out some of the reintegrated material, but it all just adds so much. If I have one significant criticism, it's that Balian needed a stronger actor. Bloom gives it his all, and I love him for it, but imagine this with a Fassbender or a Hardy anchoring it. Still, I agree with the 9.0.
This is the reason why I always feel like rolling my eyes at people saying the director cut is a masterpiece or whatever - it will never be that simply because Orlando Bloom is boring as fuck and is only good at being pretty.
@@pooty195 I wouldn't say Orlando is boring but he doesn't command that presents like a Russel Crow (Gladiator) Viggo Mortensen (LOTR) or Brad Pitt (Troy). I feel like they can convince you to follow them into battle.
@@rostikskobkariov5136 and none of the names you mentioned could work as Godrey's son-more like younger brother. If the film was made in 2021, Ridley has now worked twice with Adam Driver who would have killed in the role. I personally liked Orlando enough, though.
@@HailKingCeezer I highly disagree. Everyone of those guys have range. I'd say viggo could easily do it
This movie came out when Islamophobia at it's peak. It won't be receive well.
YES!!
Finally someone is doing a react/vid for this gem. THANK you, CR.
It's one of those, when I put on just to watch a few minutes of... I end up watching the whole thing and is DEFinitely one that flies by the quickest.
Kingdom of Heaven and The Abyss are two movies completely changed by their director's cuts. The theatrical cuts of both are faster paced, but in pretty much every other way (story, emotional impact, logical structure) the director's cuts are far superior. Heck, in the theatrical cut of Kingdom of Heaven, Balian (Orlando's character) is just suddenly inexplicably a master strategist and siege expert. In the director's cut, you learn that he was a veteran and an engineer who had built and fielded siege weapons in battle before. The story with the child, the sense of the passage of time, the political and military maneuvering; all of it is much more detailed and present. The theatrical is a fun, but somewhat choppy and uneven, adventure film. The director's cut is a near masterpiece of historical dramatization.
The Abyss similarly adds a huge sub(pardon the pun)plot and changes the level of threat that everyone is under. Some of those changes will have a little less impact for those that did not grow up during the Cold War and thus won't feel the immediacy of some of the danger as much, but the changes still make a huge impact to the amount of stress the characters are under and the importance of some of their actions. It really is almost an entirely different movie because of this.
There are three other films where the director's cut doesn't really significantly change the story, but massively improves the flow of the film and the impact of the story that was there. Those would be Aliens, Dark City, and Blade Runner. In the Aliens DC, the bit at the beginning with the colony isn't super necessary, but the moment were Ripley learns the fate of her daughter is exceedingly emotionally important to the story. And the sentry gun sequence adds huge tension to the middle of the film.
With Blade Runner, there are a bunch of different cuts that are technically director's cuts. They have all had different names applied, but they differ only slightly from one another. The main improvement across all of them is the removal of the studio mandated voice over narration. That alone makes any of the later cuts better than the theatrical. There are a ton of other subtle (and not so subtle) changes. The only thing that gets substantially altered is the potential nature of one of the main characters. But even this is still hinted at, rather than outright spoken.
In Dark City's case, the director's cut eliminates the horrendous opening narration that basically spoils the entire plot before you even get to watch the movie, and the restored and re-edited footage makes the initial detective story make so much more sense. While not a ton is added or removed, every change makes the film flow so much better. It is an interesting example because on the surface they seem very similar. But the director's cut is ultimately far superior in pretty much every way.
6:08 - that actor was an elf in LOTR - "Tell me, where is Gandalf, for I much desire to speak with him."
He plays a lot of bad guys and sinister characters, LotR is a rare role as a good guy
@@Acme1970 LOL yeah but he's still slightly off-putting as Celeborn.
This (the director's cut in particular) is truly my favorite movie of all time.
This version is better than the theater cut, by far, though it does create pacing issues, as Shaun noted. If you like Gladiator, the director cut of that is better, too. There are extra political scenes that help the plot, though it does slow the film a bit.
i watched the theatrical cut many times when i was a teenager, always enjoyed it. i was surprised to find out other people didn't like it. i've never seen the director's cut but just those first few extended scene clips have convinced me i need to watch it. great reaction as always! also if you guys've never seen The Last Kingdom on Netflix, i'm sure it would be up your alley! cheers from MN
It would have been good if yoy included your reaction to Saladins scene in Jerusalem. Arguably one of the best scenes in the entire movie and cinema history. When he picked up a fallen cross and put it on the table, did not step on a cross carving in the floor, and his soldiers bathed the city in rose water instead of blood.
My favorite ridley Scott film of all time is Kingdom of Heaven, this one. It's actually my favorite film of all time. It's atmosphere and unbiased approach is amazing. The gregorian chant and the authentic mideval soundtrack is beautiful.
Before the romanticized version of getting knighted by the sword, people were knighted by a slap, it being the last slap they should ever tolerate.
I'm new to your channel so I'm not sure if you've already watched this, but if you haven't you should check out The 13th Warrior! It's a story about Norsemen based on the Michael Crichton book "The Eaters of the Dead".
Yeah, I like that one a lot. Ridley or his editor must have been a fan as well - one of the best bits of music in "Kingdom of Heaven" was pinched from "13th Warrior."
Big fan of this film too, I think it's very much underrated. I even have some props from it, including a tunic from one of the Teutonic Knights that ambush Balian at the well, a Muslim banner and a couple of shields from Saladin's army and one of the giant spears used to bring down Saladin's siege towers at the walls of Jerusalem. And aside from that, EVA GREEN is in it!
As a person who does medieval living history, this is one of my favorite films of all time because of the care they put into getting details right. There are countless little things they took the time to put in and get right. I saw the theatrical version in the theater in full armor after giving a fighting demonstration in front of the theater, but felt it had a lot of gaps. The Directors cut answered all the questions I had. Often while packing to go to a living history event I will put on the director's cut of this, and then immediately follow it with Ridley Scott's Robin Hood, as Kingdom of Heaven ends with Richard the Lionheart going on Crusade and Robin Hood starts with Richard coming home from Crusade.
FTR I totally agree with Tom, but totally get Shaun's perspective
The director's cut is one of my favorite movies of all time! I am thrilled to see this uploaded. You're only the second channel I've ever seen react to it. Nobody ever reacts to the movies I want :( :)
One of my all time favorite films. Ridley Scott is a master of his craft.
Epic epic film.
The roadshow version is my favorite and it never dragged for me, but it's a camp out. It falls just short of greatness and a 9 is spot on. It's spectacular and underrated.
SOO GOOD you watched the director's cut, this has to be the most radical difference in quality between director's and theatrical EVER. I've only ever seen the director's cut until recently (they played it in the telly) and i was SHOCKED at how bad it is compared to the director's cut :'D
The Kingdom of Heaven director's cut is a great film. I enjoyed your reactions. You guys should also watch the ww2 film "EMPIRE OF THE SUN" that came out in 1987.
Wonder if they’ve seen Zulu…
@@HistoritorJimaldus I did college research on Zulu. Though the action was good, It isn't one of the films I'm particularly fond of due to its inaccurate (and offensive) portrayals of historical individuals in the film along with its undertones of racism in its portrayals of the Zulu etc. The South African population was still in apartheid at the time Zulu was made, and they were actually banned from watching it.
@@William-13 I know they did Hook dirty but I always thought they showed quite a lot of respect to the Zulu culture… they have the Dutch guy who teaches them to respect them for their prowess and power
@@HistoritorJimaldus The film portrayed the Zulu with a "Noble Savage" approach. Though you are correct that the film was ahead of its time in actually giving the Zulu and other African cultures screen time, it portrayed them going in as "hordes" while also Trivializing their cultural practices and traditions. Also, actual historical Zulu tactics were quite sophisticated. Portrayals of the Zulu as "Hordes" in the film didn't give them justice. I appreciate your input. Thanks.
@@HistoritorJimaldus I like "Zulu" a lot, with the caveat that black people didn't get speaking roles in British epic films when it was made. I've shown it to people who objected to the incongruous lack of bloodshed during all the battle scenes with all those thousands of Zulu warriors getting mowed down which was, again, a product of the time the film was made.
My only serious issue with it is that one vertical crane shot that goes horribly wobbly just at the height of the camera move. It's in one of those otherwise amazingly conceived and filmed build-ups to the big action scenes and it all works like gangbusters until this one drunken camera move buggers it up. No idea why they didn't shoot another one or lose it in editing. Weird.
Honestly love sweeping historical epics like this film. I really hope this genre can have a resurgence!
I think Orlando is too lightweight an actor to carry this film.
The music from the montage when the king was dying is from Hannibal.
Another historical epic I like is Alexander.
Was that piece of music written for "Hannibal" or was it just used in "Hannibal"? I've never been sure although Wikipedia seems to imply that it was written for "Hannibal." I always wondered if that was a preexisting piece Ridley liked and appropriated for the movie, which he does all the time, or if Patrick Cassidy wrote it especially for "Hannibal" - which would be a bit odd, considering Hans Zimmer's the main guy credited for the score on that but stranger things have happened with music on Ridley Scott films. It could be a piece that Cassidy and Zimmer gave a significant overhaul to make it sound like it does in "Hannibal" and in "Kingdom of Heaven." Hopefully someone will chime in who knows stuff.
They also use music from "The 13th Warrior" at the speech before defending Jerusalem.
@@karlmortoniv2951 I remember looking up that piece of music after watching Hannibal, quite some time ago, but I'm pretty sure that it was written for the film.
Edit: From Wikipedia: Vide cor meum (See my heart) is an aria composed by Irish composer Patrick Cassidy based on Dante Alighieri's Vita Nova, specifically on the sonnet A ciascun'alma presa, third chapter.
Thanks, Tom! Thanks, Shaun! 💎 The cast is top-notch in this one, right?! I long for the days when most movies got director's cuts along with their home video releases. I hope the option comes back into vogue.
For me, more than any other film, this Director’s cut improves on the original in a more signify that way. I would agree with the 9 rating whereas I would only give the theatrical version a 5 at most.
Gladiator, for me, is the only film that has an inferior Directors Cut compared to the shorter theatrical version.
If you get round to watching Troy I I would recommend go with the extended directors cut too.
Why si Gladiator worse with Directors cut?
Eva Green, say no more.
Also, what this film shows is that there is true faith in the world which helps those who need it ie. Orlando's character bringing irrigation to grow better crops, but there is also the bloodthirsty. And you choose what path yourself.
You guys ought to check out Ridley Scott's The Duellists. It's his first film and a historical epic that takes place during the Napoleonic Wars.
Seconded. I would love a react/vid to this. Even though it was Scott's first flick out the gate, he so knocked it out of the park. I love those chapter headers/vignettes so much.
I dunno, I can't see that playing very well. I don't know anyone who made it through a first viewing. It's very much a different sort of beast than what Ridley Scott would come to be known for but I like "Duellists" a lot.
@@karlmortoniv2951 Not made it through on first viewing, really? It's only a 100 minutes long. I watched it for the first time with my wife last year and we both were utterly captivated by it.
All I know is nobody I went to school with who idolized Ridley Scott liked "Duellists" at a all. If it wasn't "Alien" or "Blade Runner" or "Thelma and Louise" they didn't care. *shrug*
I fell in love with Eva Green watching this movie. Her costumes and makeup were impeccable. I also never really liked Orlando Bloom as an actor until this movie. Nine out of 10 stars.
Definitely recommend checking out Black Hawk Down from 2001, which like Kingdom of Heaven, was directed by Ridley Scott and filmed in Morocco
My first hero in the fifties was king arthur and I loved everything having to do with knights and maidens and crusades and chivalry (long before being familiar with reality). I used to ride my bike to the library and skim through collections of the fantastic/famous/classical paintings that were based on those tales. Along with everything else excellent about this film (especially the extended version where you actually find out why a blacksmith knows how to defend against a siege) this is the first time I felt like I was looking at the great paintings (that shot of knights on the battlements overlooking the port was the exquisite high point for me).
This film satisfied a cinematic desire I had had for over fifty years.
(Wouldn't you love to see a prequel with 'further adventures' of godfrey and his crusaders?)
I hate to break it to you, but the brightest and best Christians were not always the ones that went crusading. A lot of them were scary psychotic monsters who were really good at killing people and couldn't get away with that kind of barbaric behavior back home. I mean, the nobility could get away with a lot back then but some of those guys were really beyond the pale.
This is one of my favorite movies of all time; the score, the acting, the portrayals of the characters. Also liked the pilgrims guide special commentary that documents the real life aspect of the film.
13 Going On 30 FulL Movie | Jennifer Garner Movie | Comedy Movies
The "Kingdom of Heaven" Director's Cut is easily one of my Top 100 (maybe top 50) films, but "Gladiator" is my all time favorite.
And I'm with ya Tom, Ridley Scott is the man, plain and simple. Gladiator, KOH, American Gangster, Black Hawk Down, Blade Runner, Alien, Body of Lies and even (I love the film and will defend it to the death) Robin Hood with Russell Crowe. The Director's Cut (per usual with Ridley Scott) helps that film substantially.
Good for you guys watching the director’s cut! It’s a masterpiece!
Great reaction. Try Dances with Wolves - Extended Edition.
Yes
Well said.
When he called Guy “L'Oreal" I laughed so hard 😂😂
Many of the same actors from this film were in Timeline around the same time. Great film (the guy who plays the priest/knight/Remus from Potter and the guy who played Guy was also the baddies in that one. Excellent film. check it out. Timeline is also in Medieval times.
I feel like the term 'pacing' came up to be a major issue in reviews (for films, songs, even books) during the last decade more or less. And that is a bit sad for me cause people seem to be eager to finish something and go to the next thing to do instead of just laying back and enjoying it. I see where it's coming from, I just don't agree with it. If I have a great meal served to me, I'll enjoy every piece of it no matter how long it'll take to eat it. And I personally think that this movie is an excellent feast for eyes, ears and mind. I could have watched another hour or two of it with ease. But that's all about tastes I guess. If you love something, I believe you can watch it for hours without complaining (like the LOTR movies for example). Great review again guys! (and most importantly *Honest* - a rare thing in yt reactions)
This definitely is up with one the best seige battles I've ever seen.
If the movie speaks to you and you can relate to it, it's pretty powerful, but if not, then yeah you'll feel the length and end up just liking it
More people should watch this movie.
The leader of the group that came to get Balien after he killed his brother was Jamie Lannister, and the guy that played king Richard at the end was Jorah Mormont.
And the 'servant' who brought Balien to Jerusalem from the oasis is Doran Martell (ALEXANDER SIDDIG), brother of Oberyn Martell
I said it once, Ill say it again. That German soldier and those original soldiers that were killed in the ambush at the beginning should have had their own spinoff prequel show. that would be so badass!!
5:07 It's Jamie fuckin' Lannister
Question: are you watching those films with 5.1 Surround Sound?
I suggest Seven Samurai. Das Boot (director's cut). Children of Men.
Brendan Gleeson is brilliant in everything. My favorite performance of his: an Irish Catholic priest marked for death in Calvary. Brilliant, Oscar worthy performance.
25:40 actually medieval people new about infections and ways to make it less likely. they didn't know germ theory but they still knew certain things were more likely to kill and others less likely to kill.
they would use clean material if they could, and would often put honey (which does have anti-bacterial qualities) in wounds.
"Frailty" (2001) starring Matthew McConaughey and Bill Paxton (directed by Paxton) is a fantastic crime/thriller you might think about reacting to.
The two bad guys are acting powerhouses, as are the two supporting knights: Jeremy Irons and David Thewlis. Norton is a powerhouse. That's at least 5.
I've seen both versions. I kinda like the theatrical version better, but the Directors cut added a lot of interesting detail that changed some things. Either way, a powerful movie. The German 'close student of the law' is one of my favourites. I watched it again when my dad passed away; the whole 'do the right thing' aspect of it.
I watched matchstick Men on DVD and Ridley references this movie in the bonus features. something about a big movie in the desert and he had time for matchstickmen while he was waiting. As a single father that movie hit me as well.
I love the fact that e everytime Tom is scared he sounds and looks like a cat in danger. Literally, every time he makes noises like a cat hahaha 🤣 Was you a cat at your past life? Hello from Rio de Janeiro Brasil
You guys are my conflicting thoughts during a movie😂
Tom: “The amount of expense on this film is just insane”
Shaun: *dodging arrows*
lol Tom was legit impressed that Shaun knew the actor was Ed Norton
The guy who plays King Richard III and the end of the movie is Iain Glen who played Ser Jorah Mormont in Game of Thrones
I typed too fast, it's Richard I not Richard III
The Director's Cut is far more superior than the original cut, as that version was 179 minutes.
The length of the movie has no bearing on its superiority to another version.
@@eatsmylifeYT True. When you cut out things that are necessary to understand the film, it makes one version inferior by default. Length means nothing.
@@danielmacdonald9287 Of course, you're not supposed to cut out important parts. What can and should be cut out are the useless shots.
Great reaction guys, the director cut is the far superior version that adds more character drama but for me the pacing is all over the place & it's not quite on par with Gladiator which I find a much better movie..
Be interesting see your reaction on Ridley Scotts Exodus: God's & Kings.
Thank f*ck it’s the director’s edition. The theatre cut is a dog’s dinner. 😎
Thank the lord, I was worried they were gonna watch the terrible cut.
If you imply that it's bad, why would you feed dogs bad dinner? If you are trying to insult a subjective concept, try to think first. Since it makes no sense from the start it might help your cause if you implement a slight logic.
@@Gnossiene369 dude, it's British slang for a jumbled mess, as dogfood often looks.
@@Gnossiene369 - you seem a little hot under the collar there. Fancy getting your knickers in a twist over a saying 😂
Great film with the superior cut. Try Dances With Wolves, Master & Commander: The Far Side Of The World, LA Confidential and The Big Lebowski.
Tom since you are a Ridley Scott fan i suggest reacting to his fantastic movie about Colombus called 1492: Conquest of Paradise. I love that movie, great sets, visuals and a fantastic score by Vangelis. Depardieu also does a good job and Michael Wincott as a baddie like in the three musketeers is just great. React to that movie!
I wrote about this film for my master's thesis (on Hollywood's historical portrayal of Arabs/Muslims and how that was changed by 9/11), and fell in love with the director's cut. I think it's the most-improved director's cut I've ever seen (Blade Runner's director's cut is better, but that movie was better overall to begin with). I'll agree with other commenters that it probably could have been a little tighter for pacing, but I maintain that everything with Sibylla's son should have NEVER come out of the movie to begin with. Removing him removes the entire foundation for her actions in the second half of the film.
I really enjoyed the director cut of this. It is definitely a slow burner but I felt well worth it.
I've always been fascinated by the Crusades. I somewhat wish it was a film on the Third Crusade but this is a great story too.
Though I do wish they would have explained more how Bailean learned to communicate with other Crusaders (he was French most others were not, other than the Templars...as was Richard Lionheart who historians believe never spoke English. He also didnt know Latin. It wasn't broadly learned beyond the Catholic Mass prayers)
I'm also a big fan of Kingdom.of Heaven, but I've only seen the Theatrical version, will have to get a copy of this!
Extra Credits channel has 2 playlists about the Crusades from both Europe and Saladdin POV.
I loved it. Great job fellas.
"Water schmater, water what has water ever done for me." - sterling comment.
Also, and I know its insane, but in the original cut of the film, the entire dual between Orlando Bloom's character and "Loreal" is missing
The guy on the left he really get captured by movie, I like his reactions..
I got excited when my brain was telling me they had reacted to Days of Heaven
Edward Norton is so fucking masterful as Baldwin IV here.
At the very least, you'll find yourself saying "God Wills It!" to random things for the next few weeks.
You lads should try something wild-
“The Mutant Chronicles”
2008
Go with the Directors cut
Cheers!
also fun fact, the hospitaller knight, is in fact an angel, it was confirmed in God's will the commentary where the writer confirmed it, also lepressy doesn't contract instantly, you are either born with it, or you gain it from prolonged exposure to those who have it
5:09 Jamie Lannister?! I watched this before GOT and watching this reaction…..well it’s quite surprising seeing him here
28:04 And Jorah Mormont?!
"I am *not* those men. I am Salah ad-Din. _Salah_ _ad_ - _Din_ I love that moment. Edit: I also can't italicize that for shit apparently. Oh well.
@Matthew Goeth bro shut up do you know how many christian kings have done that and worse.
@Matthew Goeth The real almost any ruler was some type of piece of shit, this is a story and it's a great story moment. Doesn't have to be any more or less than that.
Thank God it’s the director’s cut. Comparatively, the theatrical makes no sense.
13 Going On 30 FulL Movie | Jennifer Garner Movie | Comedy Movies
10:05 I am half Mexican, half German. My primary hair colour is dark brown but my eyebrows are practically black, about a third of the hairs in my moustache are blond, about a quarter in my beard are red. In the sunlight it is strikingly obvious that I have 4 hair colours on my face. Just sayin, it's not impossible. :)
The actors that are scattered throughout this movie are great, Did you catch Jaime Lannister as the Sherriff?
And Saladin's right-hand man who brought Balien to Jerusalem is Doran Martell (ALEXANDER SIDDIG)
The directors cut is the best when it comes to this film though 👌.
I need you guys to watch Michael Mann's classic "Heat" w/ Robert Dinero and Al Pacino. Not your typical heist film it's incredible and I would call that a true masterpiece.
I need your other supporters to understand that hahaha
I spy the Ellis/Shalvey Moon Knight trade on your bookcase!
I got to meet Deklan Shalvey a few years ago and he drew MK for my collection!
I dont care who you are.. you are reacting to Kingdom of Heaven - Directors Cut.. instant like and sub :D
Very random suggestion, but if you’ve never seen it, I’d strongly recommend The Talented Mr. Ripley… wonderful movie with amazing performances!
and next the extended version of Troy which is also more than 45 minutes longer
To keep it short, I would give the Director's cut a 9 and the studio cut a 6, so yeah...
Weird thing is I totally agree with both of you! But I personally love this film. It just rubs me the right way.
The initiatory blow is an integral part of the knighting ceremony..
"Guy De L'Oreal" I am going start calling him that
Saw this in theaters. Seeing it now, holy cow several GoT actors.
This one my favourite history films
If you want to do "Old School" Epic Films start with "Quo Vadis" , "The Robe" , "Demetrius and the Gladiators" , "Ben-Hur" , "Spartacus" and "Cleopatra" .... I wish someone would find the missing 3 Hours of "Cleopatra"!
We're still waiting: MILLER'S CROSSING ( Gangster/Mob film ).
Regarding the work of the Coen Brothers, FARGO too.
By the way... how did you get such sunburn while watching movies at home all the time, Tom ? ;-)