Like the Osório tank, in the mid-80s. Considered at the time the best tank of the time, value for money, cheaper than its competitors, more capable than those in its category, passing all Saudi tests with flying colors, but never produced due to difficulties with suppliers. The KC 390 is different. He has already completed several missions in Brazil and in practice and in military exercises, in Brazil itself or in military exercises such as the presence of the USA. Sold to Portugal, Hungary and coveted by other countries, such as India and South Korea (and even the USA!) And hugs for you all! Love USA! From Brasil!
All C390 could be easily converted to become a KC390. They are ready for that, just had to attach the combustible tanks. This plane is like a multi task one, just "attach" the accessories and it is ready, no need to buy a plane to execute different tasks
The NEW Embraer C-390 Will CHANGE The Entire Industry! I have heard this from other youtube stations over the past 6 months or more still have not heard of many orders.
the Kawasaki C-2 was launched in 2010 and only Japan bought it, the EMBRAER KC-390 was launched in 2019 and is already sold in 7 countries and negotiations with another 5, this seems like a success to me
It is a good fantastic aircraft. but not all nations with C-130 currently, require it. it not a "must have" fighter jet where it got to be the most lethal. it is a logistic requirement that nations can/may do with an upgraded C-130. its competition is not just C-130J but also requirement needs and alternatives. The market size maybe much smaller than anticipated.
@@bricefleckenstein9666 Category of medium-sized transport and cargo planes, my friend, (the same as the C-130J Hercules)... and brother, there are spectacular videos of it landing and taking off on dirt and gravel runways... (you should take a look). -> Apparently you haven't even seen the video we are commenting on, because if you had, you would see that at 4:55 and 10:21 there are some images of what you think he is incapable of doing. A little free lesson for you: -The minimum takeoff distance* of the Embraer C-390 Millennium varies according to the mission, being: 1,100 m for tactical missions, 1,300 m for normal takeoffs, 1,630 m for logistical transport. *A runway is considered short when it is less than 1,800 meters long, as it is suitable for aircraft weighing less than 90 tons. Larger aircraft need at least 2,400 meters of runway. -It would be good if you studied a little before contradicting something said by someone else. A big hug!
@@sonnymagalhaes9203 1800 METERS? The C-130 routinely operated out of 1500 FOOT unimproved fields - aka LESS THAN 500 METERS - abet not at full load. THAT is short. 1800 Meters is longer than SOME AIRPORTS have (hello Iowa City, Iowa and it's 1500 meter (appx) main runway - an airport I lived close to for almost a decade) and you can land some AIRLINERS on runways of that length - many of which exceed 90 tons. That's NOT short - more like medium. For a more relevant reference - the airstrip at Dien Bein Phu later became the main runway of the airport there - at right about 1800 meters. Perhaps YOU should do some study of the REAL WORLD instead of taking "blurbs" as absolute truth. I stand by my comment about the unimproved runways, the chance of FOD damage is VERY MUCH HIGHER than that for the Hercules, given the high-volume flow through those LOW MOUNTED turbofans. Run a C-390 out of unimproved fields, you're BEGGING to crash it when it FOD kills an engine or both.
@@bricefleckenstein9666 Friend, don't argue with me... Use your current allegations with the FAA, AESA, CAAC, AFTAR, ANAC and "all aviation regulatory agencies" to change their rules and measures simply because you don't agree with them... or perhaps for them to create a new category for him (C-130) such as ultra, super, hyper, mega short landing, where he can reign alone... The data i mentioned are not my inventions, but rather STANDARDS and REGULATIONS of Civil and Military Aviation accepted and used throughout the world. Note that at no point did i say that the C-130 isn't included in this category or that it needs more runway for landings and takeoffs. I just said that he was surpassed! Even if the C-130 landed on 10 meters of runway, this does not remove the qualification achieved by the C-390 Millenium. In fact, the only thing that the C130 does that the C-390 does not, for obvious reasons, is land on an aircraft carrier. And this is a necessary requirement for all countries that have an aircraft carrier and want to land a C-390 on it... Oopsss. (I'm willing to bet you didn't even know that...) ---"Just so you don't forget: Short track = less than 1800 meters." ---- ... and about the Turbofans, i just have to say that EMBRAER's engineers thought of something that yours didn't. Accept it, it hurts less.
I wonder why the video bring up the Kawasaki C2? Since the C2 would be the C390's direct competition. Though the C2 does carry more, fly higher and fly farther.
C-2 it is closer to the A-400 than the C-130 or the C-390. And therefore it is much more expensive to buy, to maintain and operate, with the cost of 2 C-2 you buy 3 C-390. Furthermore, Embraer's support and tradition are much greater than that of Kawazaki, when it comes to planes.
@@GabrielFlores-sq8wc Não discordo. Meu comentário foi mais sobre o vídeo não mencionar que o C2 é competição direta. O C390 não mudará toda a indústria se houver outros aviões que façam o mesmo papel.
What do you mean? It's Boeing who wanted a partnership with Embraer, and it fell apart. Airbus chose Bombardier instead. There's very little chance of Embraer being sold given that it's a state company. Given Brazil's and France's proximity a partnership is not impossible, but Embraer just renewed a partnership with Sweden's SAAB last year.
It has more payload at full load, and more range, and is faster than the C-130 It loses BADLY on short field performance - C-130 routinely operates out of 1500 foot fields (abed at less than full load), the C390 needs significanly longer fields and is more subject to FOD issues on unpaved fields. That's what the C-130 was specifically DESIGNED for, it had to accept tradeoffs for that short field performance. The C-390 is quite a bit closer overall to the old C-141, though more efficient, or it could be counted as a smaller variant on the C-17.
C390 was tested even on Antarctica. The performance is good enough even on unprepared takeoff/landing runways. All the features but the minimum takeoff distance are superior or similar when compared with C-130 even in the "J" variant.
@@AndreCarneiro666 I VERY seriously doubt that claim about minimum takeoff distances. The OLDER Hercules varients were well known to operate out of fields as short as 1500 feet - NOTHING on the Embrayer website even claims CLOSE to that performance level for the C-390.
@@bricefleckenstein9666 The minimum takeoff distance are in this brochure from Embraer's website. Is about 1500m. But the evaluations articles can variate between 1500m and 1700m. Someone can talk about 1800m. This is not so important considering the other benefits anyway. defense.embraer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/C-390-Millennium-Brochure-2023-English.pdf
Truly an excellent aircraft. Will it impact the tactical air transportation industry? This is very likely. Is it as useful as a Herc in demanding conditions? This remains to be proven. The Herc has remained the King for 70 years because it does so many things so well and it has a proven reliability. Embraer is a brilliant challenger but this is very tough market and the C390 will have to earn its stripes with battlefield performance.
It flies faster, farther and higher than the C-130. It carries more cargo, has fewer engines to maintain, has more modern avionics and countermeasures and is cheaper. It performs more functions and has so far caused less embarrassment to world aviation than the F-35, which cost trillions of dollars, decades of development and yet everything that can go wrong happens to it. Honestly, there is no point in thinking about it, the entire military aeronautical industry knows who is the best between the two competitors. NATO, South Korea, India, Saudi Arabia and even the commander of the US Marines have said several times in public that the KC-390 NEEDS to replace their Hercules.
@@flaverusSam The C-390 FAILS BADLY vs the C-130 as an actual TACTICAL transport in many situations, far worse short-field performance. Try getting it to even LAND on a 1500 foot field when EMPTY, where the C-130 routinely made OPERATIONAL missions (abet not at full weight load) on those fields. It's also not all that much better on it's electronics vs the current PRODUCTION version of the C-130, the J model. I won't count the PROVEN ability of even the older C-130 models to operate from a carrier (1962 in trials of a KC-130 on the Forestall demonstrated THAT, though it was marginal enough that it wasn't used for actual operations after that, too many limitations caused by using such a large aircraft on a carrier).
C390 was tested even on Antarctica. The performance is good enough even on unprepared takeoff/landing runways. All the features but the minimum takeoff distance are superior or similar when compared with C-130 even in the "J" variant.
If you are going to compare it to the C-130, then use American numbers for each aircraft. Speed in mph, Altitude in ft, Cargo capacity in lbs, Cost in dollars. Etc.
When you compare products from other countries with those from the US, do you usually make the same conversions? By the way, the Anglo world is the only one that uses these shitty 'miles', you're the ones who should adapt yourselves to the rest of the planet.
Embraer fajnie wyglada, ale nie jest to jakis przelomowy samolot. Bazuje na Boeingu i ma byc jego tansza alternatywa. Czesto do celow militarnych samoloty surbosmiglowe lepiej sie sprawdzaja.
Like the Osório tank, in the mid-80s. Considered at the time the best tank of the time, value for money, cheaper than its competitors, more capable than those in its category, passing all Saudi tests with flying colors, but never produced due to difficulties with suppliers. The KC 390 is different. He has already completed several missions in Brazil and in practice and in military exercises, in Brazil itself or in military exercises such as the presence of the USA. Sold to Portugal, Hungary and coveted by other countries, such as India and South Korea (and even the USA!) And hugs for you all! Love USA! From Brasil!
mendigo carente.
❤❤
Changes, new things, are part of life. Change is necessary...
I hope Philippine Air Force🇵🇭 should order this aircrafts, I'm sick and tired of C-130 Hercules
Kc 390 is the best
No kfc 390 is better
All C390 could be easily converted to become a KC390.
They are ready for that, just had to attach the combustible tanks.
This plane is like a multi task one, just "attach" the accessories and it is ready, no need to buy a plane to execute different tasks
Wow. Thanks for your information. I haven't thought about its flexibility like that.
Aeronave é boa e é feita pela consagrada a Embraer ou seja é uma aeronave extremamente confiável
That's right.
The Kc390's stall speed is 190 km/h. It can fly at low altitudes at low speeds (I'm speaking as someone who has seen it personally).
Thanks for your information!
E conssegue pousar e levantar voos em pistas extremamente curtas, mesmo carregado
Bye bye to the C-130. The navy and Marine corps been having maintenance issues for years.
Embraer.💪
Amazing!
Petista Tecnology 🦑 ❤
The NEW Embraer C-390 Will CHANGE The Entire Industry! I have heard this from other youtube stations over the past 6 months or more still have not heard of many orders.
US lobby is certainly not sleeping..
It's coming!
the Kawasaki C-2 was launched in 2010 and only Japan bought it, the EMBRAER KC-390 was launched in 2019 and is already sold in 7 countries and negotiations with another 5, this seems like a success to me
Yes, it will replace the old one
That's right
O Melhor Avião do Mundo na sua categoria.
KC 390 é incrível!!
Yep!
It is a good fantastic aircraft. but not all nations with C-130 currently, require it. it not a "must have" fighter jet where it got to be the most lethal. it is a logistic requirement that nations can/may do with an upgraded C-130. its competition is not just C-130J but also requirement needs and alternatives. The market size maybe much smaller than anticipated.
Amazing and beautiful aircraft. C-390 is the best in this category.
Really beautiful.
What category?
Certainly not the "operate out of SHORT unimproved fields" category.
@@bricefleckenstein9666 Category of medium-sized transport and cargo planes, my friend, (the same as the C-130J Hercules)... and brother, there are spectacular videos of it landing and taking off on dirt and gravel runways... (you should take a look).
-> Apparently you haven't even seen the video we are commenting on, because if you had, you would see that at 4:55 and 10:21 there are some images of what you think he is incapable of doing.
A little free lesson for you:
-The minimum takeoff distance* of the Embraer C-390 Millennium varies according to the mission, being: 1,100 m for tactical missions, 1,300 m for normal takeoffs, 1,630 m for logistical transport.
*A runway is considered short when it is less than 1,800 meters long, as it is suitable for aircraft weighing less than 90 tons. Larger aircraft need at least 2,400 meters of runway.
-It would be good if you studied a little before contradicting something said by someone else.
A big hug!
@@sonnymagalhaes9203 1800 METERS? The C-130 routinely operated out of 1500 FOOT unimproved fields - aka LESS THAN 500 METERS - abet not at full load. THAT is short.
1800 Meters is longer than SOME AIRPORTS have (hello Iowa City, Iowa and it's 1500 meter (appx) main runway - an airport I lived close to for almost a decade) and you can land some AIRLINERS on runways of that length - many of which exceed 90 tons.
That's NOT short - more like medium.
For a more relevant reference - the airstrip at Dien Bein Phu later became the main runway of the airport there - at right about 1800 meters.
Perhaps YOU should do some study of the REAL WORLD instead of taking "blurbs" as absolute truth.
I stand by my comment about the unimproved runways, the chance of FOD damage is VERY MUCH HIGHER than that for the Hercules, given the high-volume flow through those LOW MOUNTED turbofans.
Run a C-390 out of unimproved fields, you're BEGGING to crash it when it FOD kills an engine or both.
@@bricefleckenstein9666 Friend, don't argue with me... Use your current allegations with the FAA, AESA, CAAC, AFTAR, ANAC and "all aviation regulatory agencies" to change their rules and measures simply because you don't agree with them... or perhaps for them to create a new category for him (C-130) such as ultra, super, hyper, mega short landing, where he can reign alone...
The data i mentioned are not my inventions, but rather STANDARDS and REGULATIONS of Civil and Military Aviation accepted and used throughout the world.
Note that at no point did i say that the C-130 isn't included in this category or that it needs more runway for landings and takeoffs. I just said that he was surpassed!
Even if the C-130 landed on 10 meters of runway, this does not remove the qualification achieved by the C-390 Millenium.
In fact, the only thing that the C130 does that the C-390 does not, for obvious reasons, is land on an aircraft carrier. And this is a necessary requirement for all countries that have an aircraft carrier and want to land a C-390 on it... Oopsss. (I'm willing to bet you didn't even know that...)
---"Just so you don't forget: Short track = less than 1800 meters." ----
... and about the Turbofans, i just have to say that EMBRAER's engineers thought of something that yours didn't. Accept it, it hurts less.
🇧🇷O KC 390 é simplesmente espetacular
That's right!
I wonder why the video bring up the Kawasaki C2? Since the C2 would be the C390's direct competition. Though the C2 does carry more, fly higher and fly farther.
C-2 it is closer to the A-400 than the C-130 or the C-390. And therefore it is much more expensive to buy, to maintain and operate, with the cost of 2 C-2 you buy 3 C-390. Furthermore, Embraer's support and tradition are much greater than that of Kawazaki, when it comes to planes.
O kc 390 pode carregar menas carga, mas voa mais rapido e mais longe, e sua manutenção é bem mais barata
@@GabrielFlores-sq8wc Não discordo. Meu comentário foi mais sobre o vídeo não mencionar que o C2 é competição direta. O C390 não mudará toda a indústria se houver outros aviões que façam o mesmo papel.
Yes! Definitely!!!
Yes!!
O KC 390 é o melhor em sua categoria
E tem mais ele contém tecnologia de ponta inovadora e eficaz em todos os aspectos
Yep.
Wow ! The new Embraer C-930 will change the entire industry as AIRBUS Defence and Space 😉👍.
What do you mean? It's Boeing who wanted a partnership with Embraer, and it fell apart. Airbus chose Bombardier instead. There's very little chance of Embraer being sold given that it's a state company. Given Brazil's and France's proximity a partnership is not impossible, but Embraer just renewed a partnership with Sweden's SAAB last year.
I mean, that C-390 will change the aviation industry looks like AIRBUS Defence and Space as A400m@@DrVictorVasconcelos! Like that.
I love this channel's videos because they are so helpful!
I'm so glad!
Kc390 is the best indiscutible!
That's right!
In 1977? Low, for where did you take this information?
Stopped watching when the robot pronounced 2009, "second thousand and nine". Say no to Skynet.
Very nice plane, but 2 engines? Redundancy?
Yeah! Two engines already is for redundancy. It can fly with one engine.
@@rollyherrera623 I was thinking the same thing. 4 engines has a higher chance of redundancy than 2.
🌟 WOOOW ✈ EMBRAER KC-390 ✈ The BEST MULTI MISSION Of The WORLD 🌎 !! >>>>>>> # BE STRONG 💪 BRAZILL 🔥 ✈ !!!
✈️✈️
C-390 three times better than the old C-130
It has more payload at full load, and more range, and is faster than the C-130
It loses BADLY on short field performance - C-130 routinely operates out of 1500 foot fields (abed at less than full load), the C390 needs significanly longer fields and is more subject to FOD issues on unpaved fields.
That's what the C-130 was specifically DESIGNED for, it had to accept tradeoffs for that short field performance.
The C-390 is quite a bit closer overall to the old C-141, though more efficient, or it could be counted as a smaller variant on the C-17.
@@bricefleckenstein9666 C390 Millennium pousa em chao de barro,eles tem um campo d3 aviacao,ruas de barro e eles pousa muuto bem lá👍
C390 was tested even on Antarctica. The performance is good enough even on unprepared takeoff/landing runways. All the features but the minimum takeoff distance are superior or similar when compared with C-130 even in the "J" variant.
@@AndreCarneiro666 I VERY seriously doubt that claim about minimum takeoff distances.
The OLDER Hercules varients were well known to operate out of fields as short as 1500 feet - NOTHING on the Embrayer website even claims CLOSE to that performance level for the C-390.
@@bricefleckenstein9666 The minimum takeoff distance are in this brochure from Embraer's website. Is about 1500m. But the evaluations articles can variate between 1500m and 1700m. Someone can talk about 1800m. This is not so important considering the other benefits anyway.
defense.embraer.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/C-390-Millennium-Brochure-2023-English.pdf
Truly an excellent aircraft. Will it impact the tactical air transportation industry? This is very likely. Is it as useful as a Herc in demanding conditions? This remains to be proven. The Herc has remained the King for 70 years because it does so many things so well and it has a proven reliability. Embraer is a brilliant challenger but this is very tough market and the C390 will have to earn its stripes with battlefield performance.
It flies faster, farther and higher than the C-130. It carries more cargo, has fewer engines to maintain, has more modern avionics and countermeasures and is cheaper. It performs more functions and has so far caused less embarrassment to world aviation than the F-35, which cost trillions of dollars, decades of development and yet everything that can go wrong happens to it. Honestly, there is no point in thinking about it, the entire military aeronautical industry knows who is the best between the two competitors. NATO, South Korea, India, Saudi Arabia and even the commander of the US Marines have said several times in public that the KC-390 NEEDS to replace their Hercules.
@@flaverusSam👏 👏 IT'S TRUE !! # ✈ EMBRAER KC-390 : The BEST MULTI MISSION 🌎 of The PLANET !!
@@flaverusSam The C-390 FAILS BADLY vs the C-130 as an actual TACTICAL transport in many situations, far worse short-field performance.
Try getting it to even LAND on a 1500 foot field when EMPTY, where the C-130 routinely made OPERATIONAL missions (abet not at full weight load) on those fields.
It's also not all that much better on it's electronics vs the current PRODUCTION version of the C-130, the J model.
I won't count the PROVEN ability of even the older C-130 models to operate from a carrier (1962 in trials of a KC-130 on the Forestall demonstrated THAT, though it was marginal enough that it wasn't used for actual operations after that, too many limitations caused by using such a large aircraft on a carrier).
Ta louco@@bricefleckenstein9666
C390 was tested even on Antarctica. The performance is good enough even on unprepared takeoff/landing runways. All the features but the minimum takeoff distance are superior or similar when compared with C-130 even in the "J" variant.
Nem tudo tem que ser americano, para ser bom.
🎉
Since it was "new" over a decade ago, this is just a silly enthusiast video.
Até bobo como vc, tá aqui para adimirar..
Sad when hearing that!
Bobo foi o ato que tua mãe e pai fizeram e te geraram , um sumples preservativo teria evitado muita coisa
@@FLIGAVIAbut is true, it was certified many years ago and they have only delivered 9 to customers and doesn't have many orders.
Raiva, ???
A Boeing perdeu essa corrida a anos!
até eles desenvolverem outra já passaram 20 anos!
👏👏👏👏👏😮❤🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
✈️✈️
No
Why?
Isn't it much smaller than the C-130?
Apparently it is a bit larger.
looks like but is bigger than C130
Yes, I discovered this when I checked the dimensions. Ofcourse the aircraft was closely monitored by the airforces that ordered it. Thanks.
If you are going to compare it to the C-130, then use American numbers for each aircraft. Speed in mph, Altitude in ft, Cargo capacity in lbs, Cost in dollars. Etc.
Thank you
Don't be lazy, you should know how to convert performance measurements.
When you compare products from other countries with those from the US, do you usually make the same conversions?
By the way, the Anglo world is the only one that uses these shitty 'miles', you're the ones who should adapt yourselves to the rest of the planet.
Embraer fajnie wyglada, ale nie jest to jakis przelomowy samolot. Bazuje na Boeingu i ma byc jego tansza alternatywa. Czesto do celow militarnych samoloty surbosmiglowe lepiej sie sprawdzaja.
It has nothing to do with Boeing. It's completely different projects, pal.
Never happen. Too small.
Vc entende de aviões igual as merda que sai da sua boca de gay
I am sure they can extend the fuselage if a country wants to pay for the development. The USA or the EU just need to order 100 pc.
Its actually bigger than the hercules.
@@carmenvalmalaartaraz8260 I stand corrected.
@@Taffeyboy I know it looks smaller, maybe the big cockpit windows are to blame.