Great review with a valuable in-depth opinion from someone who does alot of micros or whoops. I must say, it is a pleasure and privilege being given the opportunity to visit your home virtually for these reviews. Liftoff should have your house featured as a track :)
The new frame design innovations looks really good. Don't know if I like the camera cannopy, but Emax normally make a V2 to fix all the issues you find 😂. Nice review as allways 👌 Thank you.
Looks interesting, could be a good winter indoor whoop. How do you like it compared to the UZ65? Can you cut the guards off and make it an outdoor small park flyer, would it see much benefit?
It depends on what craft I'm flying, if I was flying a larger quad, then probably but on something like a whoop I think if you built it you should be able to judge what works for you, but it would be handy if the quad came with one more canopy with a different camera angle to cater to other people's needs. But personally for these I like exploring and mild acro, not speed.
I finally got one of these and I also got the gnarlyfpv frame for it…this thing is ridiculously fast. Looking forward to testing out the Zero 40mm frame for this sucker this weekend.
I had problems with the GNB27 connectors when they first came out . They were loose and if you wiggled them the connection would come and go . I just bought a Nano Hawk and I dont have that problem on this drone , the battery connector is very tight and you can safely wiggle it and not loose connection . Just sayin :P
Mmm looks okay, I do like adjustable camera angle though and I used to run my TH2 at around 40° or so. Think the mob6 is a better choice for me just because it doesn't have proprietary parts and has motor plugs so its just easy.
Like the the formfactor, but it could be more durable. Don't want to shoot through proprietary more costly props faster with a whoop I'm used to crash.
Of course it probably has the sbus, so you can add an xm plus or similar receiver, but do you think it would be worth it to desolder the VTX, and mount the one from the tinyhawk ii higher up behind the camera? That way it's further away from the esc's, hopefully minimizing interference. Plus you then have the ability to turn the VTX up to 100 or even 200 mW, for a stronger signal. Or would you just jump right up to using something like the tiny tank?
Proprietary motors again ugh! At least we can use different props but if you like a different kv motor you're stuck. Was hoping to try this frame but gann take a pass on this, I've learned my lesson from the tiny hawk. Great review as always Nick!
I wonder of they have made any changes to the current one they are selling at this point and time? Like I wonder if they have addressed what you had issues with? I have the very first emax tinyhawk 1s and would like to maybe try this one.
Im starting to look for your videos when i need an honest and correct review on a micro quad/whoop. Awsome vid and sound advice...cheers..much appreciated!
Makes for good business. Low cost loss-lead for some great advertisement and professional product feedback. Works even better when it is a great product! Keep up the awesomely honest vids my friend!
@Nick Burns is the FC mounting dimensions the same as other boards? Also will other whoop motors mount as well (I know it's 2 screws not 3 but I can't tell from the pics if the 2 screws are the normal distance apart). Thinking about using this frame for a custom ultra light weight build
yes fast and i seem to get better range and less dropouts with the radiomaster tx16s. I notice the latency if i go back to d8 bottoming our more but didn’t notice a difference switching to redpine from d8
Love the review. The Nanohawk was purchased using your review and that dude Nurk's review. I knew all of the shortcomings (props and 25mw vtx) but I was intrigued. Being new (first FPV was the GEPRC 4k bundle) and subsequent Happy Model Mob's and Moblite's paired with Zorro and Skyzone 02's, I figured something from 2020 wouldn't be bad. What I love about it: looks different, fly's great in angle mode (no ACRO yet and my brain can't comprehend horizon mode) and I changed nothing on the tune. There was expo on throttle! And for these guys I usually add expo. I would like to scale back the throttle (all of my Happy Models and the single GepRC are scaled to 80%) but it doesn't show up in BF. Side note: all of my Horizon Hobby Helicopters with Spektrum control have no EXPO added or needed really. But all my Futaba controlled helicopters, be it Eachine E180 or XK K130, need 20%-25% expo. Just a preference.) The Moblite7 ( I have 2 ) is still the best, but it is not a 65 mm. Not apples to apples. Mobula6 is good and Moblite6 is better. Maybe because I am more secure with the prop protection for little bumps, I take more chances. First crash in the Nano results: lost prop, but found and not bent, otherwise all good. Do you recommend any other props? Thanks again!
The props are actually pretty good but do tend to fly off, mainly due to the flexible prop protection. We can run some dental floss through them to tighten them up a bit. There really isn’t much of a payoff in changing props unless we are a top of the line flyer competing in races. We can try them for fun. Maybe less blades if we want to get a bit more flight time
@@NickBurnsFPV yes, the floss trick was employed this morning. I did bend a prop, but instead of trashing, I slowly (kinda) bent it in place. I got lucky.
Another super trick: if the video feed tonyour goggles seem notchy, check the motor mount screws. All of mine were NOT snug and the frame mount to the canopy was a touch loose. Used a smaller Philip Head screwdriver to snug them up. Worked perfect again. This falls under maintenance, but my Mobula6 or Moblite fleet don't seem prone to this.
Gday Nick, awsome review, great micro from emax, Nurk fpv also had problems with the props and the gnb32 connector his one played up, overall it seems like a good micro for indoors for those long winters, great flying love those gates you have an awsome playground now mate lol.👍🛸
This 19k kv motors can give lower throttle percentage than mobula6 19k kv motor.. This means emax motor have more power or because of the gnb connector?
@@NickBurnsFPV I probably should have said that I think i need more prop protection. And my answer to the camera angle question is that I do prefer adjustable camera angle for outdoors. For indoors, it only matters if the camera angle is not where I want it. lol.
Nick I am getting three minutes and 45 seconds every flight and I fly hard even outside.. is it because of the capacitor I put on there or is it because of me shaving the prop gauds off? Or is it the bi blades?🤷🏾♂️
I don't think its much better in terms of performance. I do think its better as it is much easier to convert batteries to it, and will likely be available on all sorts of batteries soon, maybe even 2s if the market wants it. BT2.0 typically only comes on betafpv batteries, which are poor performing batteries, one exception is the mylipo/tinywhoop bt2.0 batteries, those perform well. But the cost comparison is rough. Short version, connector is fine, the batteries they come with either cost more than others like it or perform poorly.
@@NickBurnsFPV Thank you so much for your reply! Good that you have given these the A-OK. I saw some people the other day complaining that their GNB27 connectors wouldn't connect snugly, hope that was just a batch issue and not a design flaw.
What’s up Nick🤟🏾Teddy Brooski here 😄you are the reason I ordered one of these and an extra canopy because I am going to do something different where the prop guards connect to the canopy I’m going to cut them off with a razor blade nice and smooth so it can just be carbon frame and canopy for outside and my extra canopy is for inside🙃🛸💨🔥
Another great review. For me the big question does it replace the Whoop King from last year? In your opinion is it better than the M6. My weight reduced M6 on PMB is really good and cheap. I do like the new frame idea..though.... We need the protection for indoor flying but we don't want the negative flying characteristics we get with yaw washout. Looks like they tried to address both issues. Would you say the frame is as durable as the M6 or Meteor frames. Also with with BF 4.2.x there is some sort of battery sag compensation feature. JB talked about it. Wonder if it would help. IMO it looks like a decent whoop.
The prop protection is more flexible than other whoop frames, and will likely be more durable, issue is we will likely go through more props. Also the prop protection is not nearly as "safe" as the traditional style. I expect if we run into skin it could leave a mark or curt.
I like the frame design, I do think it'll put the props at risk however. Someone will 3d print an adjustable camera mount in time. Perhaps stronger 3 blades will be more durable. I always find quad blades to get damaged more easily. Much of that is because there is almost always a prop directly behind the prop guard. Same issue on tinyhawk. 3 blades can't turtle but the 4 blades break way too easily. I am looking for a 1s but leaning towards the mobula 6 in 75mm or the Uz65. I'll see what else is released. Can you try a gemfan 3 blade on this?
Omg you changed a lot in three years haha inspiring!!!! I just got the nanohawk and i was wondering if its only 25mw for the vtx or did i mess it up somehow?
I would look at the mobula 6 or meteor65, both have better prop protection over this. More prop protection is safer and less likely to damage anything inside.
I am not sure. I thought one had shipped but I haven't seen it yet. I would like to get my hands on one to compare to the others I have been trying out.
Just got a Nanohawk, imo it is not a beginner drone. I am a beginner, started flying in Aug 2020. I am comparing this to my first quad a Mob 6. This thing can’t take a bump or a crash. I’m thinking of getting rid of it because I spend more time straightening out props than flying.
Thanks Nick, another excellent review. Although in my experience Emax VTX has been a very good performer at 25mw I'm now leaning toward at least 100mw in the small whoops. Probably not for everyone but I love to sit at the dining room table and fly inside a bit and then zoom out the open door and all around the house and a short distance away so to me it's very well worth a couple extra bucks for a stronger VTX and with that I always order with or install Crossfire and end the worries. Best of both flying experiences in one sitting and a helluva hoot. Hoping at some point there will soon be these choices with some of the great newer whoops coming out. Since I virtually never fly only indoors (certainly couldn't keep up with you anyway) 25mw is becoming a deal breaker for me even if I really like the quad.
@@NickBurnsFPV well i have the emax goggles and one of these videos said to use raceband , i guess it cant use race band without an antenna made for it or something , it wont pick it up , so i went into betaflight and switched it to A , and i came in clear , but man i dont like this drone , im seriously thinking about an entire frame and configuration swap now , im not going to be happy with this thing , even tho some ppl say they like the way it flies , im not a super pro droner so to me its just not like the tinyhawk , i miss my tinyhawk RIP :(
@@ca5ualm3dia If you haven't flown 65mm before it is different. It will likely take a bit of time to get used to it. The vtx has to be unlocked to use some channels. check the manual but I think it was to press and hold down the button next to the usb port and plug in a battery or power via usb. That should unlock it.
That noise is definitely the AIO. The tinyhawk S waves gets so bad you can't see sometimes. The tinyhawk freestyle used to do it as well when I had it stock with the emax AIO.
@@koalaman259 Yeah, I've never seen it before on any of my other whoops. Must have something to do with the particular board. Although I've never had a 200mw camera on any of my other whoops like the TH2, but this one is only 25 anyway.
@@kurtzFPV Emax. Lol I love my tinyhawk but the issues I've had with mine and fixing others have counted up to be way too many. Regardless ill rip my freestyle until the frame breaks lol
Great review as usual Nick! Camera angle, camera angle.....we need adjustable camera angle! Quick question, is Jumper sending you their new T-Lite? I'm really curious about that radio, the images look nice, but the question is it actually nice? I almost feel like pre-ordering one since its so inexpensive and i'm looking to replace my v1 X-lite. DefiantRC is selling the multi protocol one for $69.99 on pre-order.
I like the different style frame. I also like the cf/plastic combo. I don't like the fixed camera angle. Looks like a fun little "whoop" never the less. As usual, stellar review sir.
Nick, are the motor shafts 1mm? You said you ran out of props? I'm hoping you just meant the original props and not that you couldn't put other props on because emax made the shafts different size.
correct, 1mm shafts and I only have this type of prop that came with it. I have a host of other props I could have used, they just don't match what comes on this quad.
No, its way under the sub 250 grams. Or are you referring to the need for a ham license? Legally a ham license is required if flying the vtx over 25mw.
@@NickBurnsFPV thank you , I have been debating on buying a drone but all of the FAA rules have been annoying me to get one . ( its like what is next , a license to fly a paper airplane) lol
If the spi receiver was unable to bind(just stayed steady blue led, no matter my distance or position with d8 radio) I get an unrecoverable serial connection error, and failure to close serial port in betaflight, as well as terrible range on the xm plus I added (40% rssi withing 100 feet, although I don't know if that's a bad rx or related) Do you think it's possible there is a bad uart or serial port connection to the f411 chip, and would it be worth getting a replacement fc, to see if that solves any of the issues? Thanks, keep up the awesome reviews!
@@NickBurnsFPV at the moment no, but hopefully the new fc board will be in, for my freestyle ii either tomorrow or Monday. So am planning on testing the xm plus on that once it's together. I also ordered a full speed nano FrSky rx (d8) so I can try binding the nanohawk to my d8 radio still, and see if there is any difference in the rssi value and range. Thanks for the help. (Trying to get this one on d8, so I can fly the freestyle with the taranis, and a friend can fly the nanohawk with the emax e6 radio to get into fpv)
@@off-grideverything533 Is this an older taranis or a new one? We may have had this discussion. New frsky radio have new firmware, which can mean we either can't bind or we have to flash the matching firmware to the receiver, we can't downgrade the radio firmware :(
@@NickBurnsFPV its the x9 lite, but I have flashed firmware on both the receiver (xm plus) and taranis, and bound them prior to getting the nanohawk. Rebound them with a new model, after soldering it to the sbus on the nanohawk. (First bind only had power to the rx, not connected to a flight controller) both binding procedures went as expected, and produced the green activity light after power cycling and flashing the rx went as expected as well. Don't think we had talked about that one, but I have had a fair amount of questions. So it's easy to lose track, and I'm sure you have many people coming to you with questions all the time. We appreciate your knowledge and experience! Was attempting to bind to the spi receiver in d8, with the emax stock (e6) radio, which is d8 by default. Did do the rtf nanohawk cli dump as well, so it would have the emax radio settings already in betaflight (changed all appropriate settings after soldering the xm plus on, to bind with the x9 lite). Which is what all forums/videos said to do, for binding the nanohawk, to that particular radio. Got the xm plus, specifically so I could use a better radio, with the tinyhawk freestyle ii, and kept the e6 for use with d8 radios, and for friends to use. So that we can both fly at the same time. Thanks for taking the time, to help figure this out!
@@NickBurnsFPV also saw in some forums, that a couple of years ago, there seemed to be a bad batch of xm plus receivers. A few people seemed to be having similar issues with the range and rssi. So that is why I'm unsure of whether the issue is the serial connection, or pieces from the bad batch may still be going around. Or just bad qc from FrSky all around haha
Just ordered a mob6 a week ago so I'm sorta hoping this guy isn't better than that :D. Those ducts do look kinda nice and organic, just like the canopy, a bit less flex would've been nice though. I like an adjustable camera angle as well. When I fly indoors shooting gaps I fly a lower angle than outside whith the extra space
ah, we would need to add a flysky receiver. I am not sure of any limitations with that working as I haven't tested using an external receiver, from what I see on the board map it should work fine, but we need the receiver to be super small as these are sensitive to adding weight.
@@monstermechanic8670 1mm shafts. I didn't try other props, the props and tune are tied together. To give another prop an honest try I would need to retune.
I’m still beating up a barely stock UR65. I’d upgrade to this just for the camera. My biggest complaint is the washout, that’s why I haven’t replaced the UR65. This might be a winner.
I just don't like the new battery cable. I kinda like the BT 2.0 but these companies are changing things to be proprietary and that's what I don't like. The frame seems a little flimsy too and I don't see a whole bunch of protection going on. I'm bummed because I had high hopes for this one. Thanks for the review and the indoor flight, I absolutely love them. Also thanks for explaining your battery voltage when landing. Makes perfect sense and that's what I love about you. Hope you and your family are doing well, Happy holidays.
Anyone recommends me the best begginer drone for indoor, the nanohawk or the tinyhawk 2? Or any other suggestions would be appreciated, already have a Taranis qx7 a glasses and a bigger fpv drone that I just can't get the hand on yet
This one does not seem to tick the standard Emax release boxes. Don't think this one will be in my whoop fleet. however I do like the new frame design idea, very nice. The 25mW VTX sends me elsewhere. Great review as always Nick.
@@NickBurnsFPV I’d like to see someone cut off the useless prop guards, put some decent props on this, and possibly change out the canopy to see what this can really do outdoors. (I support the 2 brilliant minds hypothesis for you 2!)
@@medrone7097 I have heard this from a few people I have known online for some time, and good flyers too. I would expect we see it soon in some capacity.
Great review and flying Nick! I am not picking one up as I have too many "Hawk" quads already. I am also pretty much all DJI now with 4 quads in that ecosystem. I do love the innovation with the frame and the 1S AIO board. I do try to support Emax when I can as I do appreciate their innovation and quality.
@@NickBurnsFPV I don't think so. I have a 5" deadcat 6S that I chase remote control planes with, KababFPV Cinesplore 3", Geprc Rocket Lite 2.5" and the Flywoo Explorer LR 4". If Emax made something I would consider adding it to the fleet. I have given away many of my analog quads but still have some analog stuff like the Tiny Hawk II as the whoop and toothpick classes are always fun to have around.
@@NickBurnsFPV thank you it was driving me crazy I was trying to look to see how the hell I can connect VTX or smart audio since I’m already using T1 and R2 with express LRS receiver
@@NickBurnsFPV Did you already try the Newbeedrone Hummingbird F4 pro? Personally I like it even better than the Monula6. I think Emax is just too late on the (65mm) show
How do u guys get these soo fast!! I’m collecting eMax gear right now I’m trying to collect em all lol they are friggin fun and awesome to learn on! I’m just starting my babyhawk mods. Pretty cool! Thanks for showing have a good night. Ps sick flight
Do you mean fly fast? or get them on the same day they launch? Emax sends them out to reviewers then places an embargo until launch date. As to flying fast, cliche practice practice, its great that practice is so much fun :)
why oh why don't they ever fix their VTX white flashing....I bought another TH S to play with my new EMU Angle feature coming soon, and it's a great little quad other than that effing annoying white flashing.
Hey Babak, good to hear from you!. I trust your thanksgiving was a safe and fulfilling time? I would only select it for outside flight. While the flight feel is more quad native, the flexible prop protection means we will go through a lot of props and could cause more damage than traditional whoop frame. I am thinking of if we run into someone, they are going to feel the prop and maybe have a cut. So outside its cool, probably loads of fun at a small park with tube slides and climbing things.
hey nick its max they make nice good stuff and like yourself deserve recognition for this type of thing .. I have the baby hawk / tiny hawk / freestyle hawk / max buzz .. I like max stuff the camera wasnt well good but very acceptable the shape is awesome and you know its gonna be a nano S soon anyhow .. bet you the guys modding will have some fun with this new props etc so yeah I like it a lot and would love to get one someday..
Great review Nick! I have a non-FPV question for you. Does your treadmill actually get any use? I'm asking because my fiance has been bugging me for one for 6 months now, so I have a NordicTrack showing up next week for her. I'm thinking it may turn out to be the dumbest purchase I've ever made, but hoping I'm wrong. Seems like something that will sit and collect dust. Thanks, hope you're doing great!
I'm not Nick, but my wife runs marathons and we live somewhere it gets ridiculously cold, and it sees use in colder months. I also use it when I'm short on steps for the day, will watch streaming stuff while walking on it. However it does have an added benefit as it's one of the more fun things to fly around with a whoop, second to a power cage for workout equipment that's fun to fly around
It does get used. I walk on it and my 15yr old runs on it. I can't really run anymore. My wife prefers to run outside, but when she is really sore or doesn't want to brave the weather she uses it.
@@eedok That's for the input, really appreciate it! You're making feel a little bit better about this purchase - especially flying my whoops through it, lol!
Nice review. I can hear the motor noise in your video, but eMax says it has no onboard mic. What was picking up the motor noise, how'd you get that on the video?
I have a secondary camera that records the audio. I edit in the flight audio. This helps with many be able to tell what the flight experience is, like your flying the quad.
I bought some GNB batteries with the new GNB27 connector , plugged in a battery and had no power . Found that if I wiggled the connector I would have and lose the power connection . Thumbs down from me on the connector .
@@NickBurnsFPV I just bought a Nano HAWK and the connector fits much tighter and I have had no problems with it . The problem may have been a manufacturing issue that they have corrected .
@@NickBurnsFPV `hi Nick.The lenses on the 2 cameras are slightly different now that you mention it.Tried to insert photos but youtube won't let me.Is there a way to swap the lenses over without damaging the cameras to see?I hope so because the nano flies more like a 5 inch.I have changed the props to the Gemfan tri blades aswel.its amazing
@@davemac7945 swapping the lens is likely very difficult, I have yet to swap it myself or read about others that have done it. I have broken a few lenses trying to get them back into focus after crashing.
Not as blown away as I was from the TH freestyle, especially the flight time is meh. Looks nice though. Camera angle is definitely important if you plan to fly outside, for inside flying I usually don't use much. The problem I have with frames that allow adjustable angle is, it often also means camera jello. I guess there is no perfect formula (yet).
@@NickBurnsFPV 0.5 doesn't sound much considering how much glue I use trying to fix the issue :). Just ordered one for testing, thanks for letting me know.
Here's a link for European buyers 🙂 www.unmannedtechshop.co.uk/product/emax-nanohawk-65x-bnf/ Great detailed review as always, 100% agree with everything you said. GNB27 batteries are just a bit hard to get in EU still so I will convert mine to BT2.0 as I have a bunch of 333mah MyLipo BT2.0 packs which seem perfect size for it. I have one on the way and will be making a video about how to put it on a diet to get even more performance out of it. ~20.5g is a very good stock dry weight, but I see several bits to improve (and maybe try to design an adjustable camera mount to 3d print while at it.
Props go on nice and tight ...then, motors heat up and they come off too easily ... this is the bain of every whoop; someone needs to design props that stay on (without the weight of bolt-on) ...maybe one nylon screw or something?
Great review with a valuable in-depth opinion from someone who does alot of micros or whoops.
I must say, it is a pleasure and privilege being given the opportunity to visit your home virtually for these reviews.
Liftoff should have your house featured as a track :)
Thank you.
The new liftoff micro game that they just teased should absolutely not be released without Nick’s house.
Adjustable camera angle is important to me
Actually according to the official emax video, the glued down part is for adjusting camera angle :)
th-cam.com/video/bBWs3yGkPj4/w-d-xo.html
I'm thinking with Christmas and mom decorating she won't notice if I put my led gates up and leaving them :). Great tip about the channels over 5800
Lmfao!!! Did it work?
Pm hobbycraft in Calgary, has the 300 mah emax gnb27 batteries for the nanohawk, only place I've seen them in Canada so far
Fun fact we never get tired of your videos nick #awesomereviews
shucks, thank you
My big question: What do you think of the new frame design? And is adjustable camera angle as important to you as it is me?
nice work. yes adjustable camera angle is important to me because I simply fly SLOW. now where's the video of those crashes? hmm?
The new frame design innovations looks really good. Don't know if I like the camera cannopy, but Emax normally make a V2 to fix all the issues you find 😂. Nice review as allways 👌 Thank you.
Looks interesting, could be a good winter indoor whoop. How do you like it compared to the UZ65? Can you cut the guards off and make it an outdoor small park flyer, would it see much benefit?
It depends on what craft I'm flying, if I was flying a larger quad, then probably but on something like a whoop I think if you built it you should be able to judge what works for you, but it would be handy if the quad came with one more canopy with a different camera angle to cater to other people's needs. But personally for these I like exploring and mild acro, not speed.
not a fan of the new look, the tiny hawk looks more like a finished product than this one I find.
I finally got one of these and I also got the gnarlyfpv frame for it…this thing is ridiculously fast. Looking forward to testing out the Zero 40mm frame for this sucker this weekend.
I had problems with the GNB27 connectors when they first came out . They were loose and if you wiggled them the connection would come and go . I just bought a Nano Hawk and I dont have that problem on this drone , the battery connector is very tight and you can safely wiggle it and not loose connection . Just sayin :P
So the question is is the FC standard mounting? Looks like it. Might be a new board to use on other whoops.
Gotcha on FB
My phone blew up with notifications on this whoop. Who do I watch first ? ....no brainier...Nick Burns
Well thank you for that. I hope you weren't disappointed, at least in the video :)
@@NickBurnsFPV totally satisfied and there's no need to watch any other reviews about this in my opinion.
Mmm looks okay, I do like adjustable camera angle though and I used to run my TH2 at around 40° or so. Think the mob6 is a better choice for me just because it doesn't have proprietary parts and has motor plugs so its just easy.
Like the the formfactor, but it could be more durable. Don't want to shoot through proprietary more costly props faster with a whoop I'm used to crash.
Of course it probably has the sbus, so you can add an xm plus or similar receiver, but do you think it would be worth it to desolder the VTX, and mount the one from the tinyhawk ii higher up behind the camera? That way it's further away from the esc's, hopefully minimizing interference. Plus you then have the ability to turn the VTX up to 100 or even 200 mW, for a stronger signal. Or would you just jump right up to using something like the tiny tank?
Proprietary motors again ugh! At least we can use different props but if you like a different kv motor you're stuck. Was hoping to try this frame but gann take a pass on this, I've learned my lesson from the tiny hawk. Great review as always Nick!
yes, the motor holes don't match anything else I have, 3 or 4 hole pattern.
It's SAD! :(
7:09 throttle value is on top left
I wonder of they have made any changes to the current one they are selling at this point and time? Like I wonder if they have addressed what you had issues with? I have the very first emax tinyhawk 1s and would like to maybe try this one.
Very cool, been waiting for something like this. Im sure the right props will fix the vibes.
fresh props too
Im starting to look for your videos when i need an honest and correct review on a micro quad/whoop.
Awsome vid and sound advice...cheers..much appreciated!
Race band 8👍👍👍👍 thanks for the tip Nick!
Awesome. It is great to get so many perspectives from so many reviews at the same time.
That is one of the many qualities I like about how emax handles these launches.
Makes for good business. Low cost loss-lead for some great advertisement and professional product feedback. Works even better when it is a great product! Keep up the awesomely honest vids my friend!
1:30 niceee flightttt. Love how you review while fly, that's the best way to review FPV stuff, watch the TH-camr face a whole review is boring...
Hey! What is your 65 fave whoop right now?
Thank you very much
I tend to prefer 2s, for 1s and 65mm, I would still take the mobula6, but with the AE65 canopy.
@@NickBurnsFPV RIGHT ON, BRO!!
@Nick Burns is the FC mounting dimensions the same as other boards? Also will other whoop motors mount as well (I know it's 2 screws not 3 but I can't tell from the pics if the 2 screws are the normal distance apart). Thinking about using this frame for a custom ultra light weight build
yes, board is standard mounting, but the motor mounting is not.
@@NickBurnsFPV damn, ok thanks Nick!
have you tried Redpine instead of d8?
I have not. I hear good things about redpine, very fast.
yes fast and i seem to get better range and less dropouts with the radiomaster tx16s.
I notice the latency if i go back to d8 bottoming our more but didn’t notice a difference switching to redpine from d8
Hi Nick,
Are the motor mounts standard? Could I use the carbon and create a nano toothpick with some nano biblades?
Thanks!
No, 2 holes and other motors 3 and 4 hole don't match up.
Sad news....
Thanks for the quick response though!
Is there a way to install LED to the quad?
same board in this as your previous question. best to lookup the board map to answer these sort of questions.
Love the review. The Nanohawk was purchased using your review and that dude Nurk's review. I knew all of the shortcomings (props and 25mw vtx) but I was intrigued.
Being new (first FPV was the GEPRC 4k bundle) and subsequent Happy Model Mob's and Moblite's paired with Zorro and Skyzone 02's, I figured something from 2020 wouldn't be bad.
What I love about it: looks different, fly's great in angle mode (no ACRO yet and my brain can't comprehend horizon mode) and I changed nothing on the tune. There was expo on throttle! And for these guys I usually add expo. I would like to scale back the throttle (all of my Happy Models and the single GepRC are scaled to 80%) but it doesn't show up in BF. Side note: all of my Horizon Hobby Helicopters with Spektrum control have no EXPO added or needed really. But all my Futaba controlled helicopters, be it Eachine E180 or XK K130, need 20%-25% expo. Just a preference.)
The Moblite7 ( I have 2 ) is still the best, but it is not a 65 mm. Not apples to apples. Mobula6 is good and Moblite6 is better. Maybe because I am more secure with the prop protection for little bumps, I take more chances. First crash in the Nano results: lost prop, but found and not bent, otherwise all good. Do you recommend any other props?
Thanks again!
The props are actually pretty good but do tend to fly off, mainly due to the flexible prop protection. We can run some dental floss through them to tighten them up a bit. There really isn’t much of a payoff in changing props unless we are a top of the line flyer competing in races. We can try them for fun. Maybe less blades if we want to get a bit more flight time
@@NickBurnsFPV yes, the floss trick was employed this morning. I did bend a prop, but instead of trashing, I slowly (kinda) bent it in place. I got lucky.
Another super trick: if the video feed tonyour goggles seem notchy, check the motor mount screws. All of mine were NOT snug and the frame mount to the canopy was a touch loose. Used a smaller Philip Head screwdriver to snug them up. Worked perfect again. This falls under maintenance, but my Mobula6 or Moblite fleet don't seem prone to this.
I progressed very slowly as a new FPV pilot until I tried low camera angles (5 to 10 deg), so I think it’s important.
Gday Nick, awsome review, great micro from emax, Nurk fpv also had problems with the props and the gnb32 connector his one played up, overall it seems like a good micro for indoors for those long winters, great flying love those gates you have an awsome playground now mate lol.👍🛸
Those gates are epic!
This 19k kv motors can give lower throttle percentage than mobula6 19k kv motor.. This means emax motor have more power or because of the gnb connector?
could be either. The only way to tell would be to either put mobula6 motors on the nanohawk or put a ph2.0 on the nanohawk.
Good evening. How much flight time? Thanks.
Full flights are in the video. The end screens of the flights has the "arm time" which I would consider the flight time.
I like it. But I'm not sure its for me. Curious what it would do with a tri blade prop. But again, I think I need more durability
we could go gemfan props for more durability, but they have sharp tips, I think we might end up dinging things up with the flexible prop protection.
@@NickBurnsFPV I probably should have said that I think i need more prop protection. And my answer to the camera angle question is that I do prefer adjustable camera angle for outdoors. For indoors, it only matters if the camera angle is not where I want it. lol.
Nick I am getting three minutes and 45 seconds every flight and I fly hard even outside.. is it because of the capacitor I put on there or is it because of me shaving the prop gauds off? Or is it the bi blades?🤷🏾♂️
The capacitor won't have an impact on the flight time, but the removal of the prop guards will for sure.
What kind of flight time can you roughly expect with 450mah batteries?
While I have tested extensively I would think most would get about 40secs more flight.
Nick, what do you think specifically about the GNB27? Is it better than the BT2.0?
I don't think its much better in terms of performance. I do think its better as it is much easier to convert batteries to it, and will likely be available on all sorts of batteries soon, maybe even 2s if the market wants it. BT2.0 typically only comes on betafpv batteries, which are poor performing batteries, one exception is the mylipo/tinywhoop bt2.0 batteries, those perform well. But the cost comparison is rough. Short version, connector is fine, the batteries they come with either cost more than others like it or perform poorly.
@@NickBurnsFPV Thank you so much for your reply! Good that you have given these the A-OK. I saw some people the other day complaining that their GNB27 connectors wouldn't connect snugly, hope that was just a batch issue and not a design flaw.
What’s up Nick🤟🏾Teddy Brooski here 😄you are the reason I ordered one of these and an extra canopy because I am going to do something different where the prop guards connect to the canopy I’m going to cut them off with a razor blade nice and smooth so it can just be carbon frame and canopy for outside and my extra canopy is for inside🙃🛸💨🔥
Another great review. For me the big question does it replace the Whoop King from last year? In your opinion is it better than the M6. My weight reduced M6 on PMB is really good and cheap. I do like the new frame idea..though.... We need the protection for indoor flying but we don't want the negative flying characteristics we get with yaw washout. Looks like they tried to address both issues. Would you say the frame is as durable as the M6 or Meteor frames. Also with with BF 4.2.x there is some sort of battery sag compensation feature. JB talked about it. Wonder if it would help. IMO it looks like a decent whoop.
The prop protection is more flexible than other whoop frames, and will likely be more durable, issue is we will likely go through more props. Also the prop protection is not nearly as "safe" as the traditional style. I expect if we run into skin it could leave a mark or curt.
I like the frame design, I do think it'll put the props at risk however. Someone will 3d print an adjustable camera mount in time. Perhaps stronger 3 blades will be more durable. I always find quad blades to get damaged more easily. Much of that is because there is almost always a prop directly behind the prop guard. Same issue on tinyhawk. 3 blades can't turtle but the 4 blades break way too easily. I am looking for a 1s but leaning towards the mobula 6 in 75mm or the Uz65. I'll see what else is released. Can you try a gemfan 3 blade on this?
I haven't but I believe I have some 1mm gemfan props I can try.
so is it possible to remove the prop guards and fly it like a toothpick?
You'd have to cut 'em off as they're one piece with the canopy.
yes, we have to cut them as Filip said its all connected.
Omg you changed a lot in three years haha inspiring!!!! I just got the nanohawk and i was wondering if its only 25mw for the vtx or did i mess it up somehow?
It’s only 25mw
Great review! Looking at getting my first quadcopter and have been looking at whoops. This is a lot of help! Any beginner-friendly recommendations?
I would look at the mobula 6 or meteor65, both have better prop protection over this. More prop protection is safer and less likely to damage anything inside.
looks amazing. a 75mm version or a kit to convert would be nice.
will you get a presale jumper t-lite for a review?
I am not sure. I thought one had shipped but I haven't seen it yet. I would like to get my hands on one to compare to the others I have been trying out.
Just got a Nanohawk, imo it is not a beginner drone. I am a beginner, started flying in Aug 2020. I am comparing this to my first quad a Mob 6. This thing can’t take a bump or a crash. I’m thinking of getting rid of it because I spend more time straightening out props than flying.
Yes, the prop guards on this aren't as stiff as we have become used to in this form factor.
Lol my fleet is never complete. Wish i could afford to get the nano hawk, she looks sporty!
Thanks Nick, another excellent review. Although in my experience Emax VTX has been a very good performer at 25mw I'm now leaning toward at least 100mw in the small whoops. Probably not for everyone but I love to sit at the dining room table and fly inside a bit and then zoom out the open door and all around the house and a short distance away so to me it's very well worth a couple extra bucks for a stronger VTX and with that I always order with or install Crossfire and end the worries. Best of both flying experiences in one sitting and a helluva hoot. Hoping at some point there will soon be these choices with some of the great newer whoops coming out. Since I virtually never fly only indoors (certainly couldn't keep up with you anyway) 25mw is becoming a deal breaker for me even if I really like the quad.
I was surprised at the 25mw, I figured they would use the new more powerful vtx they have.
Hi Nick, is it possible to install ELRS to this quad?
the board does have an r1 and t1 pad we can use for elrs receiver.
Y'all cordinated this release and im not even mad.
Not so much Y'all, but Emax. I actually prefer it as it avoids the rush to the first reviews, which benefits the reviewers as well as the viewers.
what about the vtx bands and the emax goggles i cant figure out how to connect them :(
how are you trying to connect them?
@@NickBurnsFPV well i have the emax goggles and one of these videos said to use raceband , i guess it cant use race band without an antenna made for it or something , it wont pick it up , so i went into betaflight and switched it to A , and i came in clear , but man i dont like this drone , im seriously thinking about an entire frame and configuration swap now , im not going to be happy with this thing , even tho some ppl say they like the way it flies , im not a super pro droner so to me its just not like the tinyhawk , i miss my tinyhawk RIP :(
@@ca5ualm3dia If you haven't flown 65mm before it is different. It will likely take a bit of time to get used to it. The vtx has to be unlocked to use some channels. check the manual but I think it was to press and hold down the button next to the usb port and plug in a battery or power via usb. That should unlock it.
Will this bind to the emax controller from the tiny hawk fpv kit sir
yes.
That noise is definitely the AIO. The tinyhawk S waves gets so bad you can't see sometimes. The tinyhawk freestyle used to do it as well when I had it stock with the emax AIO.
I believe so too, but with only one and it being so beat up I side step being certain.
The tinyhawk2 as well. In fact I think the th2s being released now have an inline capacitor on the battery cable.
@@kurtzFPV im sure the capacitor has alot to do with it! You just wouldn't think a smaller whoop like this would need one to negate the waves.
@@koalaman259 Yeah, I've never seen it before on any of my other whoops. Must have something to do with the particular board. Although I've never had a 200mw camera on any of my other whoops like the TH2, but this one is only 25 anyway.
@@kurtzFPV Emax. Lol I love my tinyhawk but the issues I've had with mine and fixing others have counted up to be way too many. Regardless ill rip my freestyle until the frame breaks lol
WOW! Amazing! What mode is that? Were you in acro mode? Have you flown TinyHawk 2? If so, which do you like better?
Yes, acro.
Gr8 vid Nick could you cut off the prop guards and see how she fly's ?
I love my whoops...this one looks interesting..thanks Nick for the detailed review
Got the email from emax when this came out and I knew your video would be out soon
Yes, they want a coordinated release, which i don't really mind.
Great review as usual Nick! Camera angle, camera angle.....we need adjustable camera angle! Quick question, is Jumper sending you their new T-Lite? I'm really curious about that radio, the images look nice, but the question is it actually nice? I almost feel like pre-ordering one since its so inexpensive and i'm looking to replace my v1 X-lite. DefiantRC is selling the multi protocol one for $69.99 on pre-order.
I am interested in what is the most common desire, adjustable or not. So far I hear more about no camera angle than having adjustable camera angle.
Anybody have any luck binding the nano to the E6 radio? I’ve tried everything.
I like the different style frame. I also like the cf/plastic combo. I don't like the fixed camera angle. Looks like a fun little "whoop" never the less. As usual, stellar review sir.
Nick, are the motor shafts 1mm? You said you ran out of props? I'm hoping you just meant the original props and not that you couldn't put other props on because emax made the shafts different size.
correct, 1mm shafts and I only have this type of prop that came with it. I have a host of other props I could have used, they just don't match what comes on this quad.
Will the FCC license be an issue needed to flying this 🤔 ?
No, its way under the sub 250 grams. Or are you referring to the need for a ham license? Legally a ham license is required if flying the vtx over 25mw.
@@NickBurnsFPV thank you , I have been debating on buying a drone but all of the FAA rules have been annoying me to get one . ( its like what is next , a license to fly a paper airplane) lol
If the spi receiver was unable to bind(just stayed steady blue led, no matter my distance or position with d8 radio) I get an unrecoverable serial connection error, and failure to close serial port in betaflight, as well as terrible range on the xm plus I added (40% rssi withing 100 feet, although I don't know if that's a bad rx or related) Do you think it's possible there is a bad uart or serial port connection to the f411 chip, and would it be worth getting a replacement fc, to see if that solves any of the issues?
Thanks, keep up the awesome reviews!
That is pretty strange the xm+ would have terrible range. Do we have another quad we can test that xm+ on?
@@NickBurnsFPV at the moment no, but hopefully the new fc board will be in, for my freestyle ii either tomorrow or Monday. So am planning on testing the xm plus on that once it's together. I also ordered a full speed nano FrSky rx (d8) so I can try binding the nanohawk to my d8 radio still, and see if there is any difference in the rssi value and range. Thanks for the help.
(Trying to get this one on d8, so I can fly the freestyle with the taranis, and a friend can fly the nanohawk with the emax e6 radio to get into fpv)
@@off-grideverything533 Is this an older taranis or a new one? We may have had this discussion. New frsky radio have new firmware, which can mean we either can't bind or we have to flash the matching firmware to the receiver, we can't downgrade the radio firmware :(
@@NickBurnsFPV its the x9 lite, but I have flashed firmware on both the receiver (xm plus) and taranis, and bound them prior to getting the nanohawk. Rebound them with a new model, after soldering it to the sbus on the nanohawk. (First bind only had power to the rx, not connected to a flight controller) both binding procedures went as expected, and produced the green activity light after power cycling and flashing the rx went as expected as well.
Don't think we had talked about that one, but I have had a fair amount of questions. So it's easy to lose track, and I'm sure you have many people coming to you with questions all the time. We appreciate your knowledge and experience!
Was attempting to bind to the spi receiver in d8, with the emax stock (e6) radio, which is d8 by default. Did do the rtf nanohawk cli dump as well, so it would have the emax radio settings already in betaflight (changed all appropriate settings after soldering the xm plus on, to bind with the x9 lite). Which is what all forums/videos said to do, for binding the nanohawk, to that particular radio.
Got the xm plus, specifically so I could use a better radio, with the tinyhawk freestyle ii, and kept the e6 for use with d8 radios, and for friends to use. So that we can both fly at the same time.
Thanks for taking the time, to help figure this out!
@@NickBurnsFPV also saw in some forums, that a couple of years ago, there seemed to be a bad batch of xm plus receivers. A few people seemed to be having similar issues with the range and rssi. So that is why I'm unsure of whether the issue is the serial connection, or pieces from the bad batch may still be going around. Or just bad qc from FrSky all around haha
Just ordered a mob6 a week ago so I'm sorta hoping this guy isn't better than that :D. Those ducts do look kinda nice and organic, just like the canopy, a bit less flex would've been nice though. I like an adjustable camera angle as well. When I fly indoors shooting gaps I fly a lower angle than outside whith the extra space
I think you will enjoy the mobula 6. I still fly mine around.
Hi nick! I’ve been subscribed for almost a year now! I’m just wondering if there’s any way to make this work on flysky transmitter. Please reply.
ah, we would need to add a flysky receiver. I am not sure of any limitations with that working as I haven't tested using an external receiver, from what I see on the board map it should work fine, but we need the receiver to be super small as these are sensitive to adding weight.
Thanks Nick for the review! 🤠👍
Nick, was the outside flight after the addition of the glue? Just wondering about the jello. Thanks!
yes, none of my first few days flights were used in the video. I had to wait out weather to get decent weather to fly in.
@@NickBurnsFPV just curious what the motor shaft size is, and if you were able to try different props? Thanks Nick. Great job as usual.
@@monstermechanic8670 1mm shafts. I didn't try other props, the props and tune are tied together. To give another prop an honest try I would need to retune.
I’m still beating up a barely stock UR65. I’d upgrade to this just for the camera. My biggest complaint is the washout, that’s why I haven’t replaced the UR65. This might be a winner.
barely stock. Thats about how they all end up :)
Excellent Mr. Burns
Thank you sir!
Looks like it flies nicely for a 65mm
Hi Nick, what your favorite him or M6 ? 🧐
I'm also curious about this! I'm looking to pickup my first whoop to fly around the house this winter, and I'm not sure which to go for
@@DeltaInsanity Me with Mobula7 I fly very well around the house inside with M6 25 000Kv too 😀
Between the two for my flight style I would stay with mobula6.
@@NickBurnsFPV thank Bro 😀
I just don't like the new battery cable. I kinda like the BT 2.0 but these companies are changing things to be proprietary and that's what I don't like. The frame seems a little flimsy too and I don't see a whole bunch of protection going on. I'm bummed because I had high hopes for this one. Thanks for the review and the indoor flight, I absolutely love them. Also thanks for explaining your battery voltage when landing. Makes perfect sense and that's what I love about you. Hope you and your family are doing well, Happy holidays.
Anyone recommends me the best begginer drone for indoor, the nanohawk or the tinyhawk 2? Or any other suggestions would be appreciated, already have a Taranis qx7 a glasses and a bigger fpv drone that I just can't get the hand on yet
for starters indoor I would go with something with stronger prop protection like the tinyhawk/2 or mobula 6
@@NickBurnsFPV thank you a lot mate that's what I needed to hear 👌
This one does not seem to tick the standard Emax release boxes. Don't think this one will be in my whoop fleet. however I do like the new frame design idea, very nice. The 25mW VTX sends me elsewhere. Great review as always Nick.
yea, I thought the 25mw was a bit odd too, they have a 200mw in the same form factor, not sure why they didn't use it.
not feeling it..... happy to see them trying new stuff
i think the release of the nanohawk is to compeate with the mobula 6
im not the best at english
I'm rendering my video now and the beginning of mine is literally identical in the sense that it's definitely not a whoop. :-D
lol, we shall say great minds.... :)
@@NickBurnsFPV I’d like to see someone cut off the useless prop guards, put some decent props on this, and possibly change out the canopy to see what this can really do outdoors. (I support the 2 brilliant minds hypothesis for you 2!)
@@medrone7097 I have heard this from a few people I have known online for some time, and good flyers too. I would expect we see it soon in some capacity.
how are you able to do that dude. its amazing. its like your using the force luke and letting go.
lol, I fly daily, my pre bed routine is to fly 2 flights just relaxing.
Great review and flying Nick! I am not picking one up as I have too many "Hawk" quads already. I am also pretty much all DJI now with 4 quads in that ecosystem. I do love the innovation with the frame and the 1S AIO board. I do try to support Emax when I can as I do appreciate their innovation and quality.
Gotcha. Has Emax put out a quad with dji? They might be one of the few companies not to have done that yet.
@@NickBurnsFPV I don't think so. I have a 5" deadcat 6S that I chase remote control planes with, KababFPV Cinesplore 3", Geprc Rocket Lite 2.5" and the Flywoo Explorer LR 4". If Emax made something I would consider adding it to the fleet. I have given away many of my analog quads but still have some analog stuff like the Tiny Hawk II as the whoop and toothpick classes are always fun to have around.
Anybody think this is a significant step up from the meteor 65?
Where is the tx2 pad
there isn't a tx2, only a Rx2. One of the limitations
@@NickBurnsFPV thank you it was driving me crazy I was trying to look to see how the hell I can connect VTX or smart audio since I’m already using T1 and R2 with express LRS receiver
Now I may ask this or mobula 6 ?!!! I need one of this 2s 65 whoops
Mob 6 for sure just my 2 cents.
For me and my flight style the mob6, I have swapped the canopy to the AE65 canopy. For 2s and 65mm the eachine US65 pro is one to look at.
@@NickBurnsFPV Did you already try the Newbeedrone Hummingbird F4 pro? Personally I like it even better than the Monula6. I think Emax is just too late on the (65mm) show
@@MrJoris666 I have. I ended up breaking the camera shortly after review :(
Awesome review as always. I'll stick with the M6. I really want some of those gates that you have. Thanks for the review.
Did you get in on the gate giveaway? I plan to do the gate giveaway recording saturday.
@@NickBurnsFPV yes i did. 👍
How do u guys get these soo fast!! I’m collecting eMax gear right now I’m trying to collect em all lol they are friggin fun and awesome to learn on! I’m just starting my babyhawk mods. Pretty cool! Thanks for showing have a good night. Ps sick flight
Do you mean fly fast? or get them on the same day they launch? Emax sends them out to reviewers then places an embargo until launch date. As to flying fast, cliche practice practice, its great that practice is so much fun :)
It was the later. That’s pretty cool. Want one. All them actually lol
why oh why don't they ever fix their VTX white flashing....I bought another TH S to play with my new EMU Angle feature coming soon, and it's a great little quad other than that effing annoying white flashing.
Do you know what in a vtx causes that? Power regulator? Low quality?
New EMU Angle feature... Do tell!
Hey Nick, it’s Babak! Hope you had a great thanksgiving! Would you take this over the Meteor 65?
Hey Babak, good to hear from you!. I trust your thanksgiving was a safe and fulfilling time? I would only select it for outside flight. While the flight feel is more quad native, the flexible prop protection means we will go through a lot of props and could cause more damage than traditional whoop frame. I am thinking of if we run into someone, they are going to feel the prop and maybe have a cut. So outside its cool, probably loads of fun at a small park with tube slides and climbing things.
hey nick its max they make nice good stuff and like yourself deserve recognition for this type of thing .. I have the baby hawk / tiny hawk / freestyle hawk / max buzz .. I like max stuff the camera wasnt well good but very acceptable the shape is awesome and you know its gonna be a nano S soon anyhow .. bet you the guys modding will have some fun with this new props etc so yeah I like it a lot and would love to get one someday..
Great review Nick! I have a non-FPV question for you. Does your treadmill actually get any use? I'm asking because my fiance has been bugging me for one for 6 months now, so I have a NordicTrack showing up next week for her. I'm thinking it may turn out to be the dumbest purchase I've ever made, but hoping I'm wrong. Seems like something that will sit and collect dust. Thanks, hope you're doing great!
I'm not Nick, but my wife runs marathons and we live somewhere it gets ridiculously cold, and it sees use in colder months. I also use it when I'm short on steps for the day, will watch streaming stuff while walking on it.
However it does have an added benefit as it's one of the more fun things to fly around with a whoop, second to a power cage for workout equipment that's fun to fly around
It does get used. I walk on it and my 15yr old runs on it. I can't really run anymore. My wife prefers to run outside, but when she is really sore or doesn't want to brave the weather she uses it.
@@eedok That's for the input, really appreciate it! You're making feel a little bit better about this purchase - especially flying my whoops through it, lol!
@@NickBurnsFPV Thanks Nick, really appreciate it.
@@RADERFPV Not a problem.
You should put led lights on that treadmill as well Nick 😁 👍
do you mean wrapped around the posts? or a led gate on the top?
@@NickBurnsFPV wrapped around post should be nice. It will be like anither gate😁
@@rtcfpv1012 I do have power near buy.
Maybe I'll see it on your next led gates flight video 😁👍
Nice review. I can hear the motor noise in your video, but eMax says it has no onboard mic. What was picking up the motor noise, how'd you get that on the video?
I have a secondary camera that records the audio. I edit in the flight audio. This helps with many be able to tell what the flight experience is, like your flying the quad.
I bought some GNB batteries with the new GNB27 connector , plugged in a battery and had no power . Found that if I wiggled the connector I would have and lose the power connection . Thumbs down from me on the connector .
sounds like a manufacturing defect. I have not experienced that myself. I know Nurk did in his review.
@@NickBurnsFPV I just bought a Nano HAWK and the connector fits much tighter and I have had no problems with it . The problem may have been a manufacturing issue that they have corrected .
I love the way this fly's Nick but the camera view is poor compared to the Mobula 6.
the view? I don't think I understand as its the same camera, the lenses could be different depending which we are comparing.
@@NickBurnsFPV `hi Nick.The lenses on the 2 cameras are slightly different now that you mention it.Tried to insert photos but youtube won't let me.Is there a way to swap the lenses over without damaging the cameras to see?I hope so because the nano flies more like a 5 inch.I have changed the props to the Gemfan tri blades aswel.its amazing
@@davemac7945 swapping the lens is likely very difficult, I have yet to swap it myself or read about others that have done it. I have broken a few lenses trying to get them back into focus after crashing.
Bro how to connect any goggles to our drone
either use the auto scan or manually go through the channels and frequencies. The drone will need to be powered on.
@@NickBurnsFPV I can't understand
@@நம்மபுறா do you have 5.8ghz video goggles? Not wifi
@@NickBurnsFPV I have no goggles I buy it after my study so collect deatial about fpv
I also found some 31 mm triblades annnd biblades❣️
Great review but the new nano lens with the vignette on the side really a big turn off :(
Not as blown away as I was from the TH freestyle, especially the flight time is meh. Looks nice though. Camera angle is definitely important if you plan to fly outside, for inside flying I usually don't use much. The problem I have with frames that allow adjustable angle is, it often also means camera jello. I guess there is no perfect formula (yet).
I have swapped most of my mobula 6 to the AE65 canopy. Holds the camera steady with a .5gram weight penalty.
@@NickBurnsFPV 0.5 doesn't sound much considering how much glue I use trying to fix the issue :). Just ordered one for testing, thanks for letting me know.
@@VincentFischer sure. I do shave off some of the "excess" of the canopy. Much like I did in the shark byte video.
Jello is not fun. Doesn’t seem quite there yet. Thanks Nick!
Fantastic flying, Nick! Great review!!! 😃
Looks like a pretty fun little quad!
Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
Here's a link for European buyers 🙂 www.unmannedtechshop.co.uk/product/emax-nanohawk-65x-bnf/
Great detailed review as always, 100% agree with everything you said. GNB27 batteries are just a bit hard to get in EU still so I will convert mine to BT2.0 as I have a bunch of 333mah MyLipo BT2.0 packs which seem perfect size for it.
I have one on the way and will be making a video about how to put it on a diet to get even more performance out of it. ~20.5g is a very good stock dry weight, but I see several bits to improve (and maybe try to design an adjustable camera mount to 3d print while at it.
Thanks for the great "honest" review. And no.... you don't have dinner on your face.... lol
Props go on nice and tight ...then, motors heat up and they come off too easily ... this is the bain of every whoop; someone needs to design props that stay on (without the weight of bolt-on) ...maybe one nylon screw or something?
WeBLEEDfpv!