But how do you know that your (ignorant) knowledge might not even be an essential, fundamental part to what you will then discover! Or even a precursor- and perhaps the illusion is an essential part of the game?!
Most importantly when it comes to who Jesus is. John 14:6....Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
No man can comprehend what God has prepared for those who love him. 1st Corinthians 2:9 Everything you need is within, seek nothing that lies outside of your temple and your armor of God🙏👈
General rule of thumb among scientists is this: Smart scientists will happily admit when they don't know things, not so smart ones will prentend they know everything.
4 ปีที่แล้ว
Not that they know everything per se; but definitely expound upon- with conviction designed to convince- assumptions based on suppositions of things that coulda then woulda then, quite naturally follows, shoulda happened aka "theory". not unlike "evolution". Or evilsolution depending on the camp..
Student with law IQ and logica will chose between truth and carriere ...the rich professors who continue the big lies builded up in the university of a criminal perverse Anglican king as Henry III . Stop ignore your logica...use it
@@rizdekd3912 In a nutshell: "We don't know exactly how life started...thus The God I happen to believe in did it" The premium brand argument from ignorance by a demonstrable liar.
@@Belmondo_RHit is amazing how you watch a scientist, an absolute specialist in how life works, and the guy who should be asked about the origin of life, and he tells you we don't know how and it's impossible for it to come out of nothing or to come by coincidence over millions and millions of years, and he supports that with scientific logical facts, but you still choose to deny that and believe in the nonsense that you want to believe in, hell was created for people like you (And even if We had sent down unto them angels, and the dead had spoken unto them, and We had gathered together all things before their very eyes, they would not have believed, unless Allâh willed, but most of them behave ignorantly.) Quran 6:182
When I was studying biochemistry, I was amazed at 2 things. 1) how deeply interconnected and complex were the biochemical pathways in the simplest of bacteria 2)how anyone in his right mind can conclude that all of this came by random chance evolution
@@dark_searNo it would be like finding a fully functioning robot with AI and thinking it came together by itself over time merely through wind, earthquakes, or wild animals randomly moving pieces around.
@@matthewgoetter3127 It is very arrogant and unscientific of you to assume something you cannot prove, such as the existence of God. What do you base on saying that God does not exist? can you prove it? I think that if you are honest with yourself you should recognize human limitations, that includes science.
I am a physician as well as an amateur astronomer with a background in astrophysics and cosmology. This is the most intelligent presentation on the difficulty of life (even the simplest life) arising de novo
"This is the most intelligent presentation on the difficulty of life (even the simplest life) arising de novo" But saying humans don't know how to do it isn't the same thing as saying it could not have arisen 'de novo.' What does Dr Tours say about life arising naturally? NOT what do people know about it but what does HE know about life arising naturally?
The science. The information. The wonders. Whether they be large structures like galaxies or microscopic ones in the cell I stand awed and humbled at how much I didn’t (and still don’t) know. And even while I wasn’t aware of these wonders they still existed, making me feel a bit foolish for such things as taking life for granted at times, having been agnostic for a couple years in my early 20’s, avidly pursuing my own selfish pursuits without any consideration for others, sometimes feeling that God was an inconvenient truth etc.. Gratitude for this video!
Agree that the the wonders of the universe boggle the human mind and it may be beyond our intellectual capacity to unravel its mysteries, but that in no way mean that the existence of a god (or gods) is the explanation, unless “god” is simply a placeholder for “how this all works is beyond our human understanding”. We are more intelligent than a bumble bee and even a monkey, but that doesn’t mean that we have the intelligence required to understand everything. Perhaps asking a human to understand and explain the origins of life is like asking a monkey to explain how a combustion engine works. There is a physical explanation for how a combustion engine works even though that monkey doesn’t have the ability to comprehend it.
Exactly. He makes nanomachines that have repaired spinal nerves in rats. Feom no mobility to almost full. He is a scientist that actually creates things of use and doesn't depend on government funding.
These are the kind of scientists who deserve to be followed and respected, not the likes of Dawkins and Krause who have brought no benefit to humanity except for myths and stupid assumptions.
I can also quote from books of myth: Hercules' personal problems started literally at birth. Hera sent two witches to prevent the birth, but they were tricked by one of Alcmene's servants and sent to another room. Hera then sent serpents to kill him in his cradle, but Hercules strangled them both.
@@cnault3244 {And they say: "Tales of the ancients, which he has written down, and they are dictated to him morning and afternoon."} {Say: "It (this Quran) has been sent down by Him (Allah) (the Real Lord of the heavens and earth) Who knows the secret of the heavens and the earth. Truly, He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful."} [The Noble Qur'an, Surah The Criterion verses 5-6]. In short you are not the first to say this, this is way of the ones that disbelieve in the Qur'an and the previous scriptures.
As an engineer with over 40 years of experience in designing things and actually making them work - when I study all the sciences, I see overwhelming evidence of design by a Creator with perfect knowledge and understanding of all things, infinite intelligence, creativity and wisdom and unlimited power and ability. Life is far more sophisticated than our most advanced technology. There is no scientific basis whatsoever for the naive idea that life originated by the operation of purely natural laws.
Hi Sabyis. Is there any scientific evidence that life originated outside of the action of physical laws? [On the other hand, amino acids form stably out in space, and occasionally reach Earth as meteorites. And some nuclei acids form in simple Urey type plasma experiments. Gold has apparently shown that a huge variety of cyclic hydrocarbons form deep in the Earth, and can thermodynamically migrate to the surface.] I see that Tour understands that abiogenesis is a tough field these days, but what would you say are compelling reasons to believe that biology, which so apparently operates via physical laws, started in some fashion beyond physical laws?
@@SystemsMedicine Great question! I was entirely convinced that scientists would be creating life in the laboratory even as recently as 2 years ago; 72 years of belief, trashed by solid logic. One of the more interesting discoveries, by Dr. Jennifer Blank, et al. (and I don't remember the year), proved that simple, high-speed collision added molecular complexity to simple amino acids riding on meteorites. *_But consider this logic:_* At no time in our scientific investigations have *_Random Processes_* resulted in organized, functional structure. We have crystals, but they serve absolutely no function beyond themselves. Consider what it would take for nature, in the desert, with volcanic eruptions, to end up producing a "magma red," Mercedes Benz, SL500, with tires, engine, drive train, and a full tank of gasoline. We don't find hundreds of failed attempts of this strewn across the desert. The same can be said about assembling the building blocks of life. *_Random accident does NOT end up producing organized anything._* I strongly encourage you to see Dr. Tour's series on Abiogenesis. Riveting logic! The 4 building blocks he mentions, some of which are formed in mutually *_Exclusive_* environments, are far more prone to make the wrong chemical connections than the right ones. So, let us say you have one properly made protein, which is as likely as 1 chance in 10^100, and you need thousands more of the same molecule. But then the protein decays in hours, and you have to wait several Billion, Trillion, or Quadrillion years for the accident to produce another ONE such molecule. But then, you need the Lipids, Sugars and more to occur within the same narrow window of *_HOURS._* But a far more daunting challenge is one of proper assembly of all these *_unlikely_* building blocks. What accidents within random nature would push just the right lipids into position to form the bi-layer bubble which is the outer wall of the cell? BUT the most difficult challenge involves the *_information_* which organizes not only the machines which rearrange the building blocks of life, but maintains the information which tells the life how to build itself, to reorganize nutrients to grow the cell, and then to replicate and split the cell. *_Randomness AND Time_* are the ENEMIES of life forming in the first place. And the fact that the information so crucial to DNA and RNA are NOT found anywhere in nature outside of life itself means that life could not start by accident -- *_anywhere in the universe._* *_Therefore,_* if God formed life for only one purpose -- to redeem His non-physical children (NOT the bodies they wear) -- then there is likely only one planet out of several sextillion planets which contains life. In other words, an *_Empty Universe!_* And the inner *_Trekkie_* died the moment I realized that we would never see Klingons or Vulcans. 😎♥✝🇺🇸💯
As an engineer your outlook is very deterministic and the idea of mutation followed by selection is very alien to you, hence your skepticism. Given enough time these mechanisms can generate complexity. I assume you’ve come across genetic algorithms in computer science, if not they offer a very simple example of this idea in operation.
@@PenrodynLook up the Cambrian explosion. Complex life all happened at once there was no gradual evolution that took billions of years. Time is not God, God created time. Repent.
The greatest that ever lived; He had no servants, yet they called Him Master. He had no degree, yet they called Him Teacher. He had no medicines, yet they called Him Healer. He had no army, yet Kings feared Him. He won no military battles, yet He conquered the world. He had no crime, yet they crucified Him. He had no need, yet He forgave them as they mocked. He was buried in a tomb, yet He lives today. His name is Jesus Christ and He is the Saviour of the world.
The thing that really gets me are the motor proteins that move supplies around the cell. Look up the little kinesin molecule, which literally (LITERALLY) walks along the newly formed microtubules in the cell with its load. Mind-boggling stuff, and just one example of His intelligence, love and care. Praise Him!!
It’s just a biased random walk. The bias is provided by the free energy from ATP. It’s cute but nothing really deep about the mechanism. There are far more complex systems in a cell.
Dear Dr Tour, May I add to the many who have already said thank you, I'm sure that you have and are risking a lot by speaking out the way you do, but I pray that you keep doing so, to the point that this whole issue is brought out in the wider arena, once Again, THANK YOU!
Wow, im not only impressed with the wisdom contained in this video, but also in the comment section, for a change, and it includes even educated people. I say " even " educated people because I've had too many debates with people who have degrees in science but don't really understand what real science is. They think because they were taught it, it must be true ( science ). They don't understand the differences between proof, evidence, and simple hypothesis. They don't see how some scientists are very bias ( including themselves ) and ignore evidences against their unproven beliefs. They think anyone who disagrees with the commonly held beliefs aren't good scientists and heaven forbid that anyone who doesn't have a degree in science shows them the logical fallacies , suppressed evidence, leaps of logic, and hypothesis presented as proven fact involved in certain fields of study. Education does not equal intelligence. Some educated people are too proud of what they know ( and sometimes what they know isn't even true ) and not humbled by what they do not know.
Very refreshing, almost gives hope that science could one day no longer be abused and manipulated for political purposes and just be used for discovery.
There is no sane individual, good or evil, who wants his own scientists to lie to him about their discoveries. This is so because knowledge is power. In our world, it is the secretive wealthy who pull the strings of the political puppets they own, it is the secretive wealthy who control what info, what truth and what lies get published by the journalistic enterprises which they own. It's not science, rather, it is we, whose knowledge about science is gained only via the distorting lens of the media, who are "abused and manipulated for political purposes"!
Yes... Just like man landed on the moon, several times, sixty years ago, but now we don't know how to do it again after we destroyed the first computations and technology...😂
If this proves something, it proves that the evolution theory is just as blind as any other belief, it's even have higher chance to be wrong! Believing in the Creator makes much more sense.
He’s a fraud. He’s not interested in the research, just undermining the entire field amongst others to push his creationist nonsense. Professor Dave destroyed him in debate and he has been debunked many times. Tour sounds clever to the science illiterate but is a bad faith actor. He should stick to his nano tech research.
I do this out of love but James Tour is a Christian that has met Christ. You can view his testimony here: th-cam.com/video/QNGLZvtRoiU/w-d-xo.html Christ died on the Cross for your sins and on the third day rose from the dead and appeared to many people; this was to conquer death. It is also regarded as a historical fact by academic historians that Jesus died on the cross regardless of their religious beliefs.
If I understand him correctly, even the Creative Evolution folk have no clue about the complexity involved. If 'life' involved a process of getting from Step A to Step Z, you can't even reach Step A.
It’s crazy to see how the common explanation given to this question is made to look so simple We need more honest straightforward experts like this man to be given more attention instead of simplified false or unlikely narratives
Why do you even assume anything about it? If one do, one can just assume it to be inevitable instead. Notice, complex processes does not imply complex rules - rather the opposite is true. Also notice, simple rules underlying complex processes can be, and most often is, very hard to discover.
Thank you Dr. Tour. You explained something that has been overlooked for years. It is amazing to think that most people believe what they see in movies and from experts. Maybe some reject truth because it doesn't fit their world view. I once had this cognitive dissonance, it took time to dismantle the lies and rebuild my world view from diligent investigating and research. Now I am in awe how God did it. You are doing a great service to humanity. Thanks again for your service!
"We need to make this viral!" As in COVID-19 viral? Pass "thanks" on to god for creating Covid for us, would ya? Because if Evolution didn't do it, then certainly god did, right!
@@ashahadalmuthaab793 Oh yes, in your obsession to destroy science and technology, you end up destroying civilisation itself and returning us to the dark age.
You can't build a conscious either. It's good to hear academic people with common sense. I just learned more about life origin from this video than in my entire 62 years including a college degree in animal science.
5 ปีที่แล้ว
@@ExtantFrodo2 You are correct in that we are trying to produce in a lifetime what nature required millions of years of chance occurrence to finally achieve. You cannot deny the time scales involved.
He does, he will accuse Christians of using a "God of the gaps fallacy" . It's atheists' favorite argument against theists. I call it the "assumption of god of the gaps fallacy fallacy": accusing Christians who poke genuine holes in weak scientific theory of using the God of the gaps fallacy.
As Dr. Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist, he has not tried to find an answer. Even Dr. Tour exposed the stupidity of your comment in the beginning of this video.
I love it that science proves the existence of an entity possessing the intelligence and abilities to not only create life forms but to create a physical universe for it all to take place in. There are no natural systems. Everything is designed and built to arrive at what we experience as reality.
I could watch this again with popcorn! My own 2 cents, as a layman: I could be wrong, but I'm not aware of any natural force (gravity, heat, etc.), that doesn't contribute to entropy. Just on that basis, I can't fathom how the complex functionality (putting it mildly) of biological life could have arisen by sheer, unconscious accident, naturally, in an environment otherwise devoid of any biological life yet. Thanks, Dr. Tour!
You are like someone who wins the lottery, and says "I can't think how this could have happened by sheer, unconscious accident. There are so many people it could have been, how could it turn out to be _me?"_
@@ColonelFredPuntridge Totally flawed analogy that completely ignores the point about entropy and strawmans it right into the ignorant misunderstanding of probability that you hoped it was. For your example to reflect the person's actual point, you would have to have won the lottery without ever buying a ticket.
@@ColonelFredPuntridge Win the lottery with these odds? Well you are certainly optimistic. Dr. Gerlald Schroeder, MIT Top 5 Scientific Myths popularly accepted as fact: Myth #5. “Very occasionally monkeys hammering away at typewriters will type out one of Shakespeare’s sonnets.” Not true, not in this universe. But it is a popular assumption that the monkeys can do it, a wrong assumption that randomness can produce meaningful stable complexity. But let’s look at the numbers to see why the monkeys will always fail. I’ll take the only sonnet I know, sonnet number 18, “Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day …” All sonnets are 14 lines, all about the same length. This sonnet has approximately 488 letters (neglect spaces). With a typewriter or keyboard having 26 letters, the number of possible combinations is 26 to the exponential power of 488 or approximately ten to the power of 690. That is a one with 690 zeros after it. Convert the entire 10 to the 56 grams of the universe (forget working with the monkeys) into computer chips each weighing a billionth of a gram and have each chip type out a billion sonnet trials a second (or 488 billion operations per second) since the beginning of time, ten to the 18th seconds ago. The number of trials will be approximately ten to power of 92, a huge number but minuscule when compared with the 10 to power 690 possible combinations of the letters. We are off by a factor of ten to power of 600. The laws of probability confirm that the universe would have reached its heat death before getting one sonnet. We will never get a sonnet by random trials, and the most basic molecules of life are far more complex than the most intricate sonnet. As reported in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune, when the world’s most influential atheist philosopher, Antony Flew, read this analysis of complexity and several analyses related to the complexity of life brought in my third book, The Hidden Face of God, and Roy Varghese’s excellent book, The Wonder of the World, he abandoned his errant belief in a Godless world and publically apologized for leading so many persons astray for the decades that his atheistic thoughts held sway.
I’ve been saying this for years. Darwin’s theory is excellent at explaining how life adapts to its surroundings. But it’s a logical fallacy to apply the theory to the origin of life.
The most amazing presentation I have ever seen on TH-cam. This excellent scientist has just dispelled years of crap that has been fed to me by the Richard Dawkins types. Thank you Doctor.
I am an engineering student working towards my BA and masters so I’m not qualified to really comment on this but it truly fascinates me how a great chunk of science is based on a non proven theory. I’m going to look much deeper into this topic and maybe switch careers later from physics essentially to chemistry and biology. Thank you for this information worth more than gold!
@@disdat1497 You can't listen or what ? He is saying to you we will never know what about to creat ?! He is saying to you there is unlimit creater and a stupid threay like Darwin's not explain no thing.
Abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution . Evolution unlike abiogenesis is widely accepted and explains life coherently but has no comment on the origin of life. This scientist himself believes in evolution
With so many aethists just spitting out half truths, outward lies and sheer speculation, it's such a blessing to have Dr. Tour explain in intricate detail the truth of scientific reality.
@@haydenm7 it doesnt mean christianity is right, Im 1000% that uve never seen the cover of the Holy Quran, and trust me when u read it ull find the truth.
When great men speak out and with such an in depth knowledge for his subject, you would be completely crazy not to listen, and digest every priceless word!
I’ve been blown away ever since I first came across Dr. Tour. My wish is to see him on a debate stage exposing the propaganda of the “settled science” but I completely understand why no one wants to step up. It would be like lambs to the slaughter. 😁 ...53 thumbs down but not one comment of refutation. 🤦🏻♂️
I started listening to him a couple of years ago, and have been continually promoting him SINCE! More people need to be aware of him, and show their SUPPORT, for courageous & open-minded men like him, who refuse to march lockstep to the Materialist / Naturalist world-view. And instead chose to follow the evidence, WHEREVER it leads - even if it points toward a designing intelligence!
"...He commanded and they were created." (Psalm 148:5) I love how Dr. Tour begins by answering every question in a calm voice and by the time he's explained, he's not as calm...very passionate about his field of science, clearly!
Thank Allah I am a muslim. I Believe God be praised created us. Thanks for the scientist. Allah said in the Qura'n that scientists know Him more than the other people do.
I love Tour's statement regarding the evolutionists' favorite claim, "given enough time, anything's possible". Tour says that TIME is the enemy, not the friend of evol....
As science continues to advance into the future evolution is going to start to appear so ridiculous people will start to become embarrassed by believing in it.
Totally agree with you well said!! “I find this view antecedently unbelievable-a heroic triumph of ideological theory over common sense. ... I would be willing to bet that the present right-thinking consensus will come to seem laughable in a generation or two.” (Thomas Nagel).
@@partypao Sorry my friend but that was so stupid reply. He is saying to you there is a knowledge creater for life...and that's why the evolution threary is a joke. By the way even if we evoid that...the is a lot of sciences facts that proof the evolution is a joke and I allready know some of them and if you Okey with that I will give you an example ?
@@partypao There is about 60000 leaps between the monkey and the human for example. And there is a experiment proofed that you need about 100000000 years for just two useful leaps. Not even talk about the things sciences not even understand like the soul. You not need even the math to understand that's mean a trillions and trillions of time that humanity or even the universe existence. And Allah knows better.
@@partypao No, mutations are something on the order of 10,000 to 1 detrimental to beneficial. And there are no transitional species, and the Cambrian Explosion is powerful evidence for creation and against evolution.
What makes this particularly refreshing is: Not only does he know what he's talking about... but he's actually saying it. He's not putting his popularity or paycheck first, as many scientists do. Many of them know these things but are afraid to say it publicly because they know scientists who dare speak the truth about Intelligent Design are treated like they commited heresy.
No comments yet, Wow! This is groundbreaking and reignites so many philosophicaly fundamental questions of claims on how everyone and everything just came out of nothing with no intelligent intervention.
It's really cutting-edge INDEED! I'm sure you'll enjoy this quote Mukarram: "All of us have to choose the presuppositions with which we start. There are not many options - essentially, just two. Either human intelligence ultimately owes its origin to mindless matter or there is a Creator. It is strange that some people claim that it is their intelligence that leads them to prefer the first over the second" (John Lennox).
Ground breaking? What ground did he break? He is just preaching his evidence-free opinion based on creationism. This is as far from ground breaking as one can get. IF he did some actual experiment that backed his hypothesis that might be interesting - but he didn't. He didn't do any of value and none of it was new. Ground breaking? I don't think you understand the term.
The first chapter of my first biology class in college was a review of the biogenesis versus abiogenesis debate. There was plenty of smirking at the abiogenesis faction for believing that mice could be generated from rotting rags and straw. Ultimately they point to Pasteur’s beef broth experiment as the nail in the coffin of abiogenesis. The last two sentences of the chapter have always stuck with me: “And thus it was conclusively proven once and for all that life does not arise from non-life. Except for one time when I did. “
I studied medicine and I started there as a chemistry technician. The biochemistry complexities helped me to finally believe in the bible I was studying. The reasoning he expressed I was thinking during those times. Biochemistry, PHYSIOLOGY, pharmacology, you name it...in the beginning GOD created the heavens and the earth ...
Same thing happened for me when l studied fetal embryology in nursing training. Was an atheist before, after l saw the blinding complexity and biological and physiological finesse in a developing baby, l didn’t have enough faith to believe everything got here by blind chance and natural selection.
@@curious_9283 stop it ! I left Islam ! Islam it’s pure crap my man ! Nothing good in it ! Tell me one good thing ! Don’t tell me good manners n one god all these ideas were before Islam Islam did not bring one good idea for human ! Neither Christianity or any other organized religion
Excellent discussion...thank you. It is unfortunate that "Our age is so poisoned by lies that it converts everything it touches into a lie." (S. Weil 1921)
He’s just talking about the physical structures of living organisms and not even touching on the mysterious ‘spark’ that brings that organism to life. A corpse has all the structures but is still not alive. The mystery is beyond us and requires the divine touch as expressed in Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel masterpiece.
"The mystery is beyond us and requires the divine touch" is a dogma. There are many hundreds of proper scientists looking for the answers to the question: "What are the origins of life?" It's been less than 100 years since we have had the tools needed to explore this meaningfully. I think probably in my own lifetime the scientific community will have the answer.
Some highly qualified comments below. I want to just say; even if the impossibility of a protein forming in a pre bio soup occurred, tour points out that the harsh environment would destroy it before it could link up to create a cell, let alone reproduce or evolve.
No. Someone lying about science should be kept well away from children trying to learn science! Keep the creationists in church where they can't infect others
Except his entire argument is we don’t know therefore god. It’s just another iteration of the god of the gaps fallacy. It will be interesting to go back and look at this video many years from now when scientists have discovered more about abiogenesis.
"Each year we discover so much more complexity, we are more befuddled now than in 1952 (Watson-Crick.) And in 1952 we were more befuddled than we were in 1859. No wonder Darwin saw it so clearly.
First of all, greetings and respect from Tunisia to this rock solid mind... Second, I have friends in Chemistry, in biology, they have Phd's and they know nothing about what they do only what they learned, and nothing beyond that !!! I learn a lot from this man more than my friends! again, thank you Mr Tour
James Tour. Considered to be one of the top ten Chemists in the world and one of the top fifty scientists. As are so many other theistic, Christian scientists.
Exactly. Even long time ago all the scientists that came up with amazing theories were christian scientists too. Yet the atheists want the people to believe that christians cannot be scientists, because they just say God did it. That is so wrong, in so many ways. It actually gives the person a chance to look more because they see more of how extremely intelligent the universe was made and it is AMAZING!
You can sense his deep frustration within the denial of ignorance within mainstream science that instead posits itself as knowing all it needs to know about the origin of life.
When you need to lie to make your point you made your point. Please cite an example of mainstream science stating it knows all it needs to know about the origin of life. I will wait right here for your citation.
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance - it is the illusion of knowledge."
Daniel J. Boorstin
Agree. And in this instance, the illusion of knowledge that something is impossible simply because it is not understood.
Yes, Tour's ignorance of evolution is profound.
@@T_Man-mm9szDo you understand it more than him?
@@nexpro6985please tell me what you know on evolution that counters his argument. You sound like you are smarter than him
But how do you know that your (ignorant) knowledge might not even be an essential, fundamental part to what you will then discover!
Or even a precursor- and perhaps the illusion is an essential part of the game?!
“The TRUTH exists whether you find it or not. The TRUTH exists whether you believe it or not.”
Most importantly when it comes to who Jesus is. John 14:6....Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
Well put. Can't argue with that.
No man can comprehend what God has prepared for those who love him.
1st Corinthians 2:9
Everything you need is within, seek nothing that lies outside of your temple and your armor of God🙏👈
The TRUTH exists whether you believe something else is true or not.
Absolutely true.
General rule of thumb among scientists is this: Smart scientists will happily admit when they don't know things, not so smart ones will prentend they know everything.
Not that they know everything per se; but definitely expound upon- with conviction designed to convince- assumptions based on suppositions of things that coulda then woulda then, quite naturally follows, shoulda happened aka "theory". not unlike "evolution". Or evilsolution depending on the camp..
Please help us read between your lines?
Exactly
I agree to that one.
Student with law IQ and logica will chose between truth and carriere ...the rich professors who continue the big lies builded up in the university of a criminal perverse Anglican king as Henry III . Stop ignore your logica...use it
The way this was filmed makes it look like an episode of “The Office”
FAX
lol 😂 true
Hilarious 😂😂😂
Funny red herring 😂
Hit Replay, then close your eyes & listen.
You may actually learn something rather than look for entertainment.
"I did not make them witness to the creation of the heavens and the earth or to the creation of themselves," The Quran 18:51
This brilliant man speaks the truth. However the truth will only be heard by those who truly want to hear it.
What is his point, exactly?
@@rizdekd3912 In a nutshell: "We don't know exactly how life started...thus The God I happen to believe in did it"
The premium brand argument from ignorance by a demonstrable liar.
@@Belmondo_RHit is amazing how you watch a scientist, an absolute specialist in how life works, and the guy who should be asked about the origin of life, and he tells you we don't know how and it's impossible for it to come out of nothing or to come by coincidence over millions and millions of years, and he supports that with scientific logical facts, but you still choose to deny that and believe in the nonsense that you want to believe in, hell was created for people like you
(And even if We had sent down unto them angels, and the dead had spoken unto them, and We had gathered together all things before their very eyes, they would not have believed, unless Allâh willed, but most of them behave ignorantly.) Quran 6:182
When I was studying biochemistry, I was amazed at 2 things. 1) how deeply interconnected and complex were the biochemical pathways in the simplest of bacteria 2)how anyone in his right mind can conclude that all of this came by random chance evolution
This is exactly why ID claims don’t stand up to scrutiny. Amazement is just that, it’s not evidence.
@@dark_searNo it would be like finding a fully functioning robot with AI and thinking it came together by itself over time merely through wind, earthquakes, or wild animals randomly moving pieces around.
I think it’s great that your aware of the complexity of biochemistry, but there is no god of the gaps.
@@matthewgoetter3127 It is very arrogant and unscientific of you to assume something you cannot prove, such as the existence of God. What do you base on saying that God does not exist? can you prove it? I think that if you are honest with yourself you should recognize human limitations, that includes science.
Except it wasn’t random chance . You’d know that if you had actually gone to college.
I am a physician as well as an amateur astronomer with a background in astrophysics and cosmology. This is the most intelligent presentation on the difficulty of life (even the simplest life) arising de novo
A physician or physicist?
"This is the most intelligent presentation on the difficulty of life (even the simplest life) arising de novo"
But saying humans don't know how to do it isn't the same thing as saying it could not have arisen 'de novo.' What does Dr Tours say about life arising naturally? NOT what do people know about it but what does HE know about life arising naturally?
I mistakenly sent you a response meant for another. If you received it, ignore it. My apologies.
I can't even begin to explain how refreshing it feels listening to someone who knows what he is talking about.
YET SOMEWHERE WILL BLAST HIIM AND START CALLING HIM NAMES WITHOUT ANY PROOF THAT HE IS IN ERROR.
It sounds more like medieval
He's a fraud!
@@carlosenriquegonzalez-isla6523😅
He doesn't. Tour demonstrably does not understand the field.
This his been demonstrated myriad times.
The science. The information. The wonders. Whether they be large structures like galaxies or microscopic ones in the cell I stand awed and humbled at how much I didn’t (and still don’t) know. And even while I wasn’t aware of these wonders they still existed, making me feel a bit foolish for such things as taking life for granted at times, having been agnostic for a couple years in my early 20’s, avidly pursuing my own selfish pursuits without any consideration for others, sometimes feeling that God was an inconvenient truth etc.. Gratitude for this video!
Agree that the the wonders of the universe boggle the human mind and it may be beyond our intellectual capacity to unravel its mysteries, but that in no way mean that the existence of a god (or gods) is the explanation, unless “god” is simply a placeholder for “how this all works is beyond our human understanding”. We are more intelligent than a bumble bee and even a monkey, but that doesn’t mean that we have the intelligence required to understand everything. Perhaps asking a human to understand and explain the origins of life is like asking a monkey to explain how a combustion engine works. There is a physical explanation for how a combustion engine works even though that monkey doesn’t have the ability to comprehend it.
@@T_Man-mm9sz so u believe in panspermia
"Time is the enemy of competing pre-biotic processes"
finally somone said it.
Just because a raving lunatic religious extremist like Tour SAID something doesn't make it true. 😂
I love how he keeps starting out calm but then getting this steam up...
He's so deeply into this subject.
Clearly this guy isn't living off government and corporate funding.
Exactly. He makes nanomachines that have repaired spinal nerves in rats. Feom no mobility to almost full. He is a scientist that actually creates things of use and doesn't depend on government funding.
😂
He leaves off Christian funding.
These are the kind of scientists who deserve to be followed and respected, not the likes of Dawkins and Krause who have brought no benefit to humanity except for myths and stupid assumptions.
"It is the work of God, who perfected all things. Indeed, He is Acquainted with that which you do." The Quran 27:88
I can also quote from books of myth: Hercules' personal problems started literally at birth. Hera sent two witches to prevent the birth, but they were tricked by one of Alcmene's servants and sent to another room. Hera then sent serpents to kill him in his cradle, but Hercules strangled them both.
Hello,
Dr Tour is a Christian. If you're interested you can watch his testimony here:
th-cam.com/video/QNGLZvtRoiU/w-d-xo.html
Kind regards
@@cnault3244 doesn’t apply to Christianity so irrelevant
It's nice to see Muslims and Christians agreeing on at least this topic.
@@cnault3244 {And they say: "Tales of the ancients, which he has written down, and they are dictated to him morning and afternoon."}
{Say: "It (this Quran) has been sent down by Him (Allah) (the Real Lord of the heavens and earth) Who knows the secret of the heavens and the earth. Truly, He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful."} [The Noble Qur'an, Surah The Criterion verses 5-6].
In short you are not the first to say this, this is way of the ones that disbelieve in the Qur'an and the previous scriptures.
"The problem with evolution, is that it requires miracles without a miracle maker." - Guy H. Pierce
Well said.
Except it doesn't.
Just because some dude said a thing doesn't make it true. 😂
As an engineer with over 40 years of experience in designing things and actually making them work - when I study all the sciences, I see overwhelming evidence of design by a Creator with perfect knowledge and understanding of all things, infinite intelligence, creativity and wisdom and unlimited power and ability. Life is far more sophisticated than our most advanced technology. There is no scientific basis whatsoever for the naive idea that life originated by the operation of purely natural laws.
Hi Sabyis. Is there any scientific evidence that life originated outside of the action of physical laws? [On the other hand, amino acids form stably out in space, and occasionally reach Earth as meteorites. And some nuclei acids form in simple Urey type plasma experiments. Gold has apparently shown that a huge variety of cyclic hydrocarbons form deep in the Earth, and can thermodynamically migrate to the surface.] I see that Tour understands that abiogenesis is a tough field these days, but what would you say are compelling reasons to believe that biology, which so apparently operates via physical laws, started in some fashion beyond physical laws?
@@SystemsMedicine Great question! I was entirely convinced that scientists would be creating life in the laboratory even as recently as 2 years ago; 72 years of belief, trashed by solid logic. One of the more interesting discoveries, by Dr. Jennifer Blank, et al. (and I don't remember the year), proved that simple, high-speed collision added molecular complexity to simple amino acids riding on meteorites.
*_But consider this logic:_* At no time in our scientific investigations have *_Random Processes_* resulted in organized, functional structure. We have crystals, but they serve absolutely no function beyond themselves.
Consider what it would take for nature, in the desert, with volcanic eruptions, to end up producing a "magma red," Mercedes Benz, SL500, with tires, engine, drive train, and a full tank of gasoline. We don't find hundreds of failed attempts of this strewn across the desert. The same can be said about assembling the building blocks of life. *_Random accident does NOT end up producing organized anything._*
I strongly encourage you to see Dr. Tour's series on Abiogenesis. Riveting logic! The 4 building blocks he mentions, some of which are formed in mutually *_Exclusive_* environments, are far more prone to make the wrong chemical connections than the right ones. So, let us say you have one properly made protein, which is as likely as 1 chance in 10^100, and you need thousands more of the same molecule. But then the protein decays in hours, and you have to wait several Billion, Trillion, or Quadrillion years for the accident to produce another ONE such molecule. But then, you need the Lipids, Sugars and more to occur within the same narrow window of *_HOURS._* But a far more daunting challenge is one of proper assembly of all these *_unlikely_* building blocks. What accidents within random nature would push just the right lipids into position to form the bi-layer bubble which is the outer wall of the cell?
BUT the most difficult challenge involves the *_information_* which organizes not only the machines which rearrange the building blocks of life, but maintains the information which tells the life how to build itself, to reorganize nutrients to grow the cell, and then to replicate and split the cell.
*_Randomness AND Time_* are the ENEMIES of life forming in the first place. And the fact that the information so crucial to DNA and RNA are NOT found anywhere in nature outside of life itself means that life could not start by accident -- *_anywhere in the universe._*
*_Therefore,_* if God formed life for only one purpose -- to redeem His non-physical children (NOT the bodies they wear) -- then there is likely only one planet out of several sextillion planets which contains life. In other words, an *_Empty Universe!_* And the inner *_Trekkie_* died the moment I realized that we would never see Klingons or Vulcans.
😎♥✝🇺🇸💯
As an engineer your outlook is very deterministic and the idea of mutation followed by selection is very alien to you, hence your skepticism. Given enough time these mechanisms can generate complexity. I assume you’ve come across genetic algorithms in computer science, if not they offer a very simple example of this idea in operation.
@@PenrodynLook up the Cambrian explosion. Complex life all happened at once there was no gradual evolution that took billions of years. Time is not God, God created time. Repent.
1 Corinthians 1:19 - For it is written: “I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, And bring to nothing the understanding of the prudent.”
James is pointing how ridiculous atheist scientists (especially biologists) have become compared to the evidence.
But a computer is making life, ONLY ON EARTH.
What is the evidence that a god created life?
@@cnault3244 the evidence is in the Quran. Read it & u will know that God exists & he is the creator of everything that exists
@@whatsnew2138 what evidence is in the quran, the quran us a claim by a dude not evidence
No the evidence is found in the Bible. The Bible is the Word of God. God created the heavens and the earth (Gen 1:1).
Anyone coming from "Journey of certainty" for Dr. Eyad Qynaibi ? 🙋♀️
Me
Me
+1
Me too
Naw but I'll go that way next😁 preciate that
We need more scientists like James Tour, open and sincere and with guts to tell what they really think!
He starts so calm and turns into Hulk at the end of a sentence LOL
The greatest that ever lived; He had no servants, yet they called Him Master. He had no degree, yet they called Him Teacher. He had no medicines, yet they called Him Healer. He had no army, yet Kings feared Him. He won no military battles, yet He conquered the world. He had no crime, yet they crucified Him. He had no need, yet He forgave them as they mocked. He was buried in a tomb, yet He lives today. His name is Jesus Christ and He is the Saviour of the world.
The thing that really gets me are the motor proteins that move supplies around the cell. Look up the little kinesin molecule, which literally (LITERALLY) walks along the newly formed microtubules in the cell with its load. Mind-boggling stuff, and just one example of His intelligence, love and care. Praise Him!!
Exactly, "I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made..." Psalm 139:14
It’s just a biased random walk. The bias is provided by the free energy from ATP. It’s cute but nothing really deep about the mechanism. There are far more complex systems in a cell.
Dear Dr Tour, May I add to the many who have already said thank you, I'm sure that you have and are risking a lot by speaking out the way you do, but I pray that you keep doing so, to the point that this whole issue is brought out in the wider arena, once Again, THANK YOU!
He's a fraud
When i try to give feedback, i look for a way to email them direct. He probably will never see you comment on you tube.
Wow, im not only impressed with the wisdom contained in this video, but also in the comment section, for a change, and it includes even educated people.
I say " even " educated people because I've had too many debates with people who have degrees in science but don't really understand what real science is. They think because they were taught it, it must be true ( science ). They don't understand the differences between proof, evidence, and simple hypothesis. They don't see how some scientists are very bias ( including themselves ) and ignore evidences against their unproven beliefs. They think anyone who disagrees with the commonly held beliefs aren't good scientists and heaven forbid that anyone who doesn't have a degree in science shows them the logical fallacies , suppressed evidence, leaps of logic, and hypothesis presented as proven fact involved in certain fields of study.
Education does not equal intelligence. Some educated people are too proud of what they know ( and sometimes what they know isn't even true ) and not humbled by what they do not know.
The whole ID claim is biased to divine intervention. It’s not science. Nuff said.
We are fearfully and wonderfully made.
By God
Very refreshing, almost gives hope that science could one day no longer be abused and manipulated for political purposes and just be used for discovery.
JamesB well said
You mean like it was originally?
There is no sane individual, good or evil, who wants his own scientists to lie to him about their discoveries. This is so because knowledge is power. In our world, it is the secretive wealthy who pull the strings of the political puppets they own, it is the secretive wealthy who control what info, what truth and what lies get published by the journalistic enterprises which they own. It's not science, rather, it is we, whose knowledge about science is gained only via the distorting lens of the media, who are "abused and manipulated for political purposes"!
Almost
*To keep the story short:* “We are unable to recreate the creation of life, because we do not know how.”
And that the "random chance" argument is rubbish
@@dogbiskits only for brainwashed people
Yes... Just like man landed on the moon, several times, sixty years ago, but now we don't know how to do it again after we destroyed the first computations and technology...😂
If this proves something, it proves that the evolution theory is just as blind as any other belief, it's even have higher chance to be wrong! Believing in the Creator makes much more sense.
Not only makes more sense!
It is the sanity itself!!
It's the only way..
So basically
"science involves too much thinking so god" 🤣🤣🤣
Science is built on evidence, a god belief on faith. In an emergency I think I’d trust science.
I am a molecular biochemist I admit creation is the only way.
Now prove there is a creator!
Man: I can manipulate molecules to create life!
God: Create your own molecules.
Correction: man cannot manipulate molecules to create life, not even close
James Tour should be awarded Nobel prize for pointing out all the falsehood in the research of Origin of Life.
Nobel prizes only go to those willing to sell their soul to the elites narrative.
He’s a fraud. He’s not interested in the research, just undermining the entire field amongst others to push his creationist nonsense. Professor Dave destroyed him in debate and he has been debunked many times. Tour sounds clever to the science illiterate but is a bad faith actor. He should stick to his nano tech research.
اللي جاي من عند الدكتور إياد قنيبي يخبط لايك
I do this out of love but James Tour is a Christian that has met Christ. You can view his testimony here: th-cam.com/video/QNGLZvtRoiU/w-d-xo.html
Christ died on the Cross for your sins and on the third day rose from the dead and appeared to many people; this was to conquer death. It is also regarded as a historical fact by academic historians that Jesus died on the cross regardless of their religious beliefs.
Dr Tour, Thank You for your amazing work, and sharing it with me.
All Glory to God.
Godspeed and Blessings for you and yours Dr Tour.
If I understand him correctly, even the Creative Evolution folk have no clue about the complexity involved. If 'life' involved a process of getting from Step A to Step Z, you can't even reach Step A.
At last a man who is not scared to stand up and tell the truth. Good for you sir
This guy is honest and sincere. He is out of the box.
Honest and brave. Thank you. I almost have no confidence in the academia now. Thank you that I know there are still people with integrity in there.
It’s crazy to see how the common explanation given to this question is made to look so simple
We need more honest straightforward experts like this man to be given more attention instead of simplified false or unlikely narratives
Agree. There is no shame in simply saying that “we don’t know” or “we humans simply aren’t intelligent enough to sort all this out”.
Richard Dawkins "left"
everytime i study biochemical pathways i get chills , its so complex and so beautiful , i doubt all of that is intially just the product of randomness
Why do you even assume anything about it? If one do, one can just assume it to be inevitable instead. Notice, complex processes does not imply complex rules - rather the opposite is true. Also notice, simple rules underlying complex processes can be, and most often is, very hard to discover.
Thank you Dr. Tour. You explained something that has been overlooked for years. It is amazing to think that most people believe what they see in movies and from experts. Maybe some reject truth because it doesn't fit their world view. I once had this cognitive dissonance, it took time to dismantle the lies and rebuild my world view from diligent investigating and research. Now I am in awe how God did it. You are doing a great service to humanity. Thanks again for your service!
I got goose bumps just listening to these scientific process being processed. This is amazing. We need to make this viral!
"We need to make this viral!"
As in COVID-19 viral? Pass "thanks" on to god for creating Covid for us, would ya? Because if Evolution didn't do it, then certainly god did, right!
Amazing video
yes, and this destroys completely darwin evolution theory and those atheists who do not believe in God ( Allah ) existence 😁👍
الملحدين العرب : المسلمين دافعين له
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته اخ مصطفى😅
@@ashahadalmuthaab793 Oh yes, in your obsession to destroy science and technology, you end up destroying civilisation itself and returning us to the dark age.
@@ashahadalmuthaab793 wait wait wait waaait. I am also a believer but how do you think this DESTROYS Darwin's speciation and evolution theory?
You can't build a conscious either. It's good to hear academic people with common sense. I just learned more about life origin from this video than in my entire 62 years including a college degree in animal science.
@@ExtantFrodo2
You are correct in that we are trying to produce in a lifetime what nature required millions of years of chance occurrence to finally achieve. You cannot deny the time scales involved.
Richard Dawkins has absolutely no answer to this.
He does, he will accuse Christians of using a "God of the gaps fallacy" . It's atheists' favorite argument against theists. I call it the "assumption of god of the gaps fallacy fallacy": accusing Christians who poke genuine holes in weak scientific theory of using the God of the gaps fallacy.
As Dr. Dawkins is an evolutionary biologist, he has not tried to find an answer. Even Dr. Tour exposed the stupidity of your comment in the beginning of this video.
Almighty God. To Him belong all praise, glory, and worship!! Will Mr. Tour be invited to present this at T.E.D.?
I love it that science proves the existence of an entity possessing the intelligence and abilities to not only create life forms but to create a physical universe for it all to take place in. There are no natural systems. Everything is designed and built to arrive at what we experience as reality.
Point me to this “proof”. If proof existed, then faith wouldn’t be required.
I could watch this again with popcorn! My own 2 cents, as a layman: I could be wrong, but I'm not aware of any natural force (gravity, heat, etc.), that doesn't contribute to entropy. Just on that basis, I can't fathom how the complex functionality (putting it mildly) of biological life could have arisen by sheer, unconscious accident, naturally, in an environment otherwise devoid of any biological life yet. Thanks, Dr. Tour!
You are like someone who wins the lottery, and says "I can't think how this could have happened by sheer, unconscious accident. There are so many people it could have been, how could it turn out to be _me?"_
@@ColonelFredPuntridge Totally flawed analogy that completely ignores the point about entropy and strawmans it right into the ignorant misunderstanding of probability that you hoped it was. For your example to reflect the person's actual point, you would have to have won the lottery without ever buying a ticket.
@@ColonelFredPuntridge Win the lottery with these odds? Well you are certainly optimistic.
Dr. Gerlald Schroeder, MIT
Top 5 Scientific Myths popularly accepted as fact:
Myth #5. “Very occasionally monkeys hammering away at typewriters will type
out one of Shakespeare’s sonnets.”
Not true, not in this universe. But it is a popular assumption that the monkeys can do it, a wrong assumption that randomness can produce meaningful stable complexity. But let’s look at the numbers to see why the monkeys will always fail. I’ll take the only sonnet I know, sonnet number 18, “Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day …” All sonnets are 14 lines, all about the same length. This sonnet has approximately 488 letters (neglect spaces). With a typewriter or keyboard having 26 letters, the number of possible combinations is 26 to the exponential power of 488 or approximately ten to the power of 690. That is a one with 690 zeros after it. Convert the entire 10 to the 56 grams of the universe (forget working with the monkeys) into computer chips each weighing a billionth of a gram and have each chip type out a billion sonnet trials a second (or 488 billion operations per second) since the beginning of time, ten to the 18th seconds ago. The number of trials will be approximately ten to power of 92, a huge number but minuscule when compared with the 10 to power 690 possible combinations of the letters. We are off by a factor of ten to power of 600. The laws of probability confirm that the universe would have reached its heat death before getting one sonnet. We will never get a sonnet by random trials, and the most basic molecules of life are far more complex than the most intricate sonnet. As reported in the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune, when the world’s most influential atheist philosopher, Antony Flew, read this analysis of complexity and several analyses related to the complexity of life brought in my third book, The Hidden Face of God, and Roy Varghese’s excellent book, The Wonder of the World, he abandoned his errant belief in a Godless world and publically apologized for leading so many persons astray for the decades that his atheistic thoughts held sway.
@@Papa-dopoulos Even better, whole lottery made itself
@@RozkminToeven better, a lottery with 10 to the 90th chance of winning.
This is one of the best videos on the internet. We are spoon fed evolution like it 100% proved
I’ve been saying this for years. Darwin’s theory is excellent at explaining how life adapts to its surroundings. But it’s a logical fallacy to apply the theory to the origin of life.
The most amazing presentation I have ever seen on TH-cam. This excellent scientist has just dispelled years of crap that has been fed to me by the Richard Dawkins types. Thank you Doctor.
I am an engineering student working towards my BA and masters so I’m not qualified to really comment on this but it truly fascinates me how a great chunk of science is based on a non proven theory. I’m going to look much deeper into this topic and maybe switch careers later from physics essentially to chemistry and biology. Thank you for this information worth more than gold!
Once I heard Mishio Kaku say : "God is the best Chemist, engineer, physicist and mathematic"
Nice to know some people are smart enough to know how stupid they are. This is where knowledge begins.
Frank Harrod The words
Nice way of putting it. I wouldn't have thought if putting it that way.
That just goes to show how smart you are yourself. Fascinating mate
He is not stupid, he is just saying what nobody knows. People think science know everything this guy is spelling it out that they don't.
It's called humility and seems to be a rare attribute among those in the "scientific community."
My heart does backflips listening to him, even though my body is old and disabled!
Would someone, please call Richard Dawkins to come listen to a scientist that have the answers.
the guy actually spent the whole video saying "we don't know", how does he got any answer lol
😂😂
@@disdat1497
You can't listen or what ?
He is saying to you we will never know what about to creat ?!
He is saying to you there is unlimit creater and a stupid threay like Darwin's not explain no thing.
Abiogenesis has nothing to do with evolution . Evolution unlike abiogenesis is widely accepted and explains life coherently but has no comment on the origin of life. This scientist himself believes in evolution
That's exactly the answer, most of the scientists say they do know, and teach like science what is just a hypothesis (in many areas)
Thank you, Dr. Tour. You are a gift in this world of mush.
We humans exhibit all the traits of having been wonderfully made minus one . . . humility.
Therein lies the beginning of understanding.
Still funny how people like Dawkins stay far away from Abiogenesis.
With so many aethists just spitting out half truths, outward lies and sheer speculation, it's such a blessing to have Dr. Tour explain in intricate detail the truth of scientific reality.
"This is the creation of God . So show Me what those other than Him have created." The Quran 31:11
Hello,
Dr Tour is a Christian.
If you're interested you can watch his testimony here.
th-cam.com/video/QNGLZvtRoiU/w-d-xo.html
Kind regards
I believe the creator can be known but not through the Quran.
@@haydenm7
I know he is.
And from Josh background.
He is good about there is a creater...but three ?!
And one of them die ?
No ofcaurse.
@@andys3035
Why ?
Do you read it ?!
@@haydenm7 it doesnt mean christianity is right, Im 1000% that uve never seen the cover of the Holy Quran, and trust me when u read it ull find the truth.
When great men speak out and with such an in depth knowledge for his subject, you would be completely crazy not to listen, and digest every priceless word!
True, especially when they can claim to be challenged by anyone in their field..
I'm a biologist and microbiologist. This man speaks truth.
I’ve been blown away ever since I first came across Dr. Tour. My wish is to see him on a debate stage exposing the propaganda of the “settled science” but I completely understand why no one wants to step up. It would be like lambs to the slaughter. 😁
...53 thumbs down but not one comment of refutation. 🤦🏻♂️
I started listening to him a couple of years ago, and have been continually promoting him SINCE! More people need to be aware of him, and show their SUPPORT, for courageous & open-minded men like him, who refuse to march lockstep to the Materialist / Naturalist world-view. And instead chose to follow the evidence, WHEREVER it leads - even if it points toward a designing intelligence!
"...He commanded and they were created." (Psalm 148:5)
I love how Dr. Tour begins by answering every question in a calm voice and by the time he's explained, he's not as calm...very passionate about his field of science, clearly!
100% correct! I would also read the book “signature in the cell”, The book is fascinating.
Thank Allah I am a muslim. I Believe God be praised created us.
Thanks for the scientist.
Allah said in the Qura'n that scientists know Him more than the other people do.
I love Tour's statement regarding the evolutionists' favorite claim, "given enough time, anything's possible".
Tour says that TIME is the enemy, not the friend of evol....
This is the smoking gun, why hasn't everyone heard this? Absolutely amazing presentation.
Life from non-life has not been explained. Something from nothing has not been explained. Macro-evolution is full of holes.
As science continues to advance into the future evolution is going to start to appear so ridiculous people will start to become embarrassed by believing in it.
Totally agree with you well said!!
“I find this view antecedently unbelievable-a heroic triumph of ideological theory over common sense. ... I would be willing to bet that the present right-thinking consensus will come to seem laughable in a generation or two.” (Thomas Nagel).
This isnt about evolution. It's about the origin of life. Evolution is real. Origin of life as what most scientists would say it is, is impossible.
@@partypao
Sorry my friend but that was so stupid reply.
He is saying to you there is a knowledge creater for life...and that's why the evolution threary is a joke.
By the way even if we evoid that...the is a lot of sciences facts that proof the evolution is a joke and I allready know some of them and if you Okey with that I will give you an example ?
@@partypao
There is about 60000 leaps between the monkey and the human for example.
And there is a experiment proofed that you need about 100000000 years for just two useful leaps.
Not even talk about the things sciences not even understand like the soul.
You not need even the math to understand that's mean a trillions and trillions of time that humanity or even the universe existence.
And Allah knows better.
@@partypao No, mutations are something on the order of 10,000 to 1 detrimental to beneficial. And there are no transitional species, and the Cambrian Explosion is powerful evidence for creation and against evolution.
What makes this particularly refreshing is: Not only does he know what he's talking about... but he's actually saying it. He's not putting his popularity or paycheck first, as many scientists do.
Many of them know these things but are afraid to say it publicly because they know scientists who dare speak the truth about Intelligent Design are treated like they commited heresy.
Yes... Lost jobs, careers, even lost lives
Yes, the book Slaughter of the Dissidents details how anyone in academia questions 'evolution' are attacked, lose tenure, jobs, funding.
You're kidding, right? Creationism is the most lucrative of the ideology-for-profit industries!
Good to have this man on our side, God bless brother.
There are 3 great misteries: Creation of Life, Conciousness and the Universe.
No comments yet, Wow! This is groundbreaking and reignites so many philosophicaly fundamental questions of claims on how everyone and everything just came out of nothing with no intelligent intervention.
It's really cutting-edge INDEED! I'm sure you'll enjoy this quote Mukarram: "All of us have to choose the presuppositions with which we start. There are not many options - essentially, just two. Either human intelligence ultimately owes its origin to mindless matter or there is a Creator. It is strange that some people claim that it is their intelligence that leads them to prefer the first over the second" (John Lennox).
Ground breaking? What ground did he break? He is just preaching his evidence-free opinion based on creationism. This is as far from ground breaking as one can get. IF he did some actual experiment that backed his hypothesis that might be interesting - but he didn't. He didn't do any of value and none of it was new. Ground breaking? I don't think you understand the term.
The first chapter of my first biology class in college was a review of the biogenesis versus abiogenesis debate. There was plenty of smirking at the abiogenesis faction for believing that mice could be generated from rotting rags and straw. Ultimately they point to Pasteur’s beef broth experiment as the nail in the coffin of abiogenesis. The last two sentences of the chapter have always stuck with me: “And thus it was conclusively proven once and for all that life does not arise from non-life. Except for one time when I did. “
Pasteur's beef-broth experiment lasted how long - a few weeks? And how much volume was in it?
I studied medicine and I started there as a chemistry technician. The biochemistry complexities helped me to finally believe in the bible I was studying. The reasoning he expressed I was thinking during those times. Biochemistry, PHYSIOLOGY, pharmacology, you name it...in the beginning GOD created the heavens and the earth ...
Then Quran will impress you more if you have this biochemistry background
Same thing happened for me when l studied fetal embryology in nursing training. Was an atheist before, after l saw the blinding complexity and biological and physiological finesse in a developing baby, l didn’t have enough faith to believe everything got here by blind chance and natural selection.
@@caroleevandyk5544 Our GOD Is An Awesome GOD! Have You Read The Book Of Enoch?
@@curious_9283 it doesn't.
@@curious_9283 stop it ! I left Islam ! Islam it’s pure crap my man ! Nothing good in it ! Tell me one good thing ! Don’t tell me good manners n one god all these ideas were before Islam Islam did not bring one good idea for human ! Neither Christianity or any other organized religion
So what do we get out of this video. It takes a super intelligent being to do this. God
Excellent discussion...thank you. It is unfortunate that "Our age is so poisoned by lies that it converts everything it touches into a lie." (S. Weil 1921)
He’s just talking about the physical structures of living organisms and not even touching on the mysterious ‘spark’ that brings that organism to life. A corpse has all the structures but is still not alive. The mystery is beyond us and requires the divine touch as expressed in Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel masterpiece.
So, Frankenstein's monster? Right, just produce Frankenstein's monster and one might have a credible argument for a naturalistic origin of life.
Isn't the point of 'life' not to try to understand it but just to experience it?
"The mystery is beyond us and requires the divine touch" is a dogma. There are many hundreds of proper scientists looking for the answers to the question: "What are the origins of life?" It's been less than 100 years since we have had the tools needed to explore this meaningfully. I think probably in my own lifetime the scientific community will have the answer.
Some highly qualified comments below. I want to just say; even if the impossibility of a protein forming in a pre bio soup occurred, tour points out that the harsh environment would destroy it before it could link up to create a cell, let alone reproduce or evolve.
This is awesome. Should be required watching in every biology class.
No. Someone lying about science should be kept well away from children trying to learn science!
Keep the creationists in church where they can't infect others
Except his entire argument is we don’t know therefore god. It’s just another iteration of the god of the gaps fallacy. It will be interesting to go back and look at this video many years from now when scientists have discovered more about abiogenesis.
@@raito1239they’ll likely discover that they’re getting further away from understanding it.
"Each year we discover so much more complexity, we are more befuddled now than in 1952 (Watson-Crick.) And in 1952 we were more befuddled than we were in 1859.
No wonder Darwin saw it so clearly.
Thanks, Dr. James
You left no single reason for those who believe in the myth of evolution to keep up with their fictitious theory
The more we know, the more complex it becomes...
This is one of the beautiful things I have ever seen or heard.
I agree 🙌🏽🔥🔥🔥❤️❤️❤️
One of the most honest videos concerning science I have ever watched. And, it concerns the most basic of life. Life itself.
I remember this lesson from evolutionary biology and having all the students look around confused like, "this is the best theory?"
Welcome to reality, the best theory is the one that match all evidence, and that's what abiogenesis is.
It is simple, God is much smarter than us!
Someone send the link to this video to Richard Dawkins, he is still confused.
The more you learn the less you know.
👍👍👍
First of all, greetings and respect from Tunisia to this rock solid mind... Second, I have friends in Chemistry, in biology, they have Phd's and they know nothing about what they do only what they learned, and nothing beyond that !!! I learn a lot from this man more than my friends! again, thank you Mr Tour
Our Islamic countries' education system are really in dire need of improvement
One of my closest friends has her PhD in biochemistry; my mom in chemistry. Both agree that only God can be the Creator, not Mother Nature.
Send this video to them
James Tour. Considered to be one of the top ten Chemists in the world and one of the top fifty scientists. As are so many other theistic, Christian scientists.
Exactly. Even long time ago all the scientists that came up with amazing theories were christian scientists too. Yet the atheists want the people to believe that christians cannot be scientists, because they just say God did it. That is so wrong, in so many ways. It actually gives the person a chance to look more because they see more of how extremely intelligent the universe was made and it is AMAZING!
You can sense his deep frustration within the denial of ignorance within mainstream science that instead posits itself as knowing all it needs to know about the origin of life.
When you need to lie to make your point you made your point. Please cite an example of mainstream science stating it knows all it needs to know about the origin of life. I will wait right here for your citation.
One video of this guy and I'm won over. Can't wait to check our more of his stuff. Great video!
Ayo if you can find a video of his testimony, it’s really powerful. Hearing such an intellectual profess his faith so confidently is refreshing
We are fearfully and wonderfully made.💗
This is the video I have give a lot up vote than any other, your comments are exellent.
23 minutes of just saying "life is complex, yo! And I'm smarter than my critics!"
Brilliant truth said by brave scientist. Bravo! 👍👍👍