After interpolating part of a movie to 190fps and watching it, yeah both of these versions look cheap, just that one is Microsoft Powerpoint edition and the other one is Powerpoint Premium
@ That is nothing but you saying this is what I am use to in film, and has nothing to do with the quality of what is on screen. Nothing more then a "i'm not use to it reaction".
@ No idea what you are saying either tbh. "Cinematic" doesn't mean anything specific - at most it means "what I associate with movies" - which isn't bad or good, it's just an association you have. Someone trained you that way. "Cheap" isn't really what I get either, since that train very much isn't, and since I know that higher framerates requires more expensive equipment.
@@Ralismyname yeah, but since not many action movies shot in 60fps, it does feel weird to see one and the guy is mentioning that it feels like a game cutscene because how rare it is. Especially on 1:44
@@hedhog963 , could you please elaborate a bit? Why are you so eager to lose the story immersion and feel like watching actors act instead? When I watched Gemini Man in 60 fps, the whole movie felt like painfully artificial. Cinema is so inherently artificial as an art form that the closer it looks like actual visual input, the more it distances me from experiencing its actual storytelling.
60fps looks like a TH-camr movie or something. HFR is nice, but i guess movies are supposed to be 24fps because we are used to seeing it that way. Idk what makes it uncanny, 24fps is better. Though i watch every movie in 1.2x speed so this reply can suck ass.
60 fps does look stunning for some shots like the heavy firing one and the bike follow shot. But its not working at all for the talkie portions. I feel like I'm standing on the set and watching them talk but cannot control my head movement. 24 fps takes us to a cinematic universe with more motion blurs than in real life. Humans love to see unique visuals when compared to real life visuals. But i also found that even some high action shots looked great in 24fps. Hope they come up with a film in which 60fps or 120fps are used for only certain high action shots and the remaining stays 24fps. I know that a full film final output is not possible to be taken in different fps's for different shots. But I just hope we figure that out somehow.
Into The Spiderverse was animated at 30fps while some scenes were at 60fps for emphasis. It worked very well for them with the most memorable scene of Miles Morales jumping off the high building being a 60fps shot
@@MrBumpalicious is it real?, bc then we would have to donload thousands of double frames just to watch the rest of the movie if im not mistaken and that would just double the movie storage
@@juanchi3559 sorry i was wrong. its animated at 12fps like animes are, and then in scenes it goes to 24fps. I had heard it doubled fps in some scenes and wrongly assumed it was 30 to 60
its because the there is less motion detail at 24fps your eye has less information in the same amount of time vs a higher frame rate. thus things in motion are harder to perceive.
I noticed it was a stuntman mainly because when he shouts "move MOVE" you cant actually see anything move. Usually when someones shouting you can see at least partial movement from what little you can see of their jaw, and maybe some muscles in the neck etc.
Not sure what top commenter are even talking about. 60fps is simply clearly superior and reduces eye strain greatly too. 🤦🏻♂️ obviously it is clearly better too, which is why Avatar2 will be 60fps or more. Sad to see how narrow minded people are and not able to understand new technology if this is not something they are not used too. 🤦🏻♂️
My eyes are strained from 60fps fast movement jumping into multiple cut scenes very fast just horrible for anyone's eyesight why movies don't look like this in theater would get sued from all the seizures 60fps would induce
I think the pan at 0:14 and 1:21 allow the best comparision. It really eliminates that jitter and blur at 60 FPS. For the rest of it though, I don't think either really have much of an advantage interms of immersion. 24-30 FPS usually just wins by default because people are used to it.
Weird how the masses are still clinging to a framerate established back in the 1920's. I'm over it. Give me smooth panning and end the horrible strobing caused by shooting at a framerate too slow for the human eye.
It was established back in the 1920s?? Then it must be bad! Maybe some people just prefer the heavier, more filmic look of 24 frames and are somehow not bothered by the "horrible strobing."
High frames aren't meant for movies. They look so unreal and staged. The bike chase looked slower in 60fps.. while in 25fps the motion blur added a sense of more speed.
@@spyro440 Actually yes, that's basically how vision works. Look around a room, you'll find that your eyes have difficulty smoothly 'tracking' across a room without fixating on a single point. When you look from one thing to another, your brain uses your peripherals to basically 'simulate' the in-between space. Frame rates like 24 fps do a good job at imitating the choppiness of real vision. If an object is staying in the same place in frame, it'll remain sharp. 60fps+ on the other hand, will capture the entire frame with clarity. But when your eyes are watching a screen, they don't create a natural motion blur like you'd see in real life, because your eyes are fixated on a single point - the screen. So the entire thing feels unnaturally clear. So while your eyes don't have 'motion blur' per se, motion blur is probably the closest analog you'll get to how the human eye works.
Im predominantly a gamer than a movie person, and I find 24FPS hurting my eye after getting used to 60FPS.But I get what many of you, who are used to with 24FPS, feel.
@@NativeSon253 But those are fake frames. I would never solely because of the artefacts. Maybe in sport you would sacrifice having artefacts for smoother motion.
the movie was shot at 120fps, and it was sold on blu-ray at 60fps, I just ripped the files and compared it to the streaming version, which is 28fps, I didn't do interpolation or use software to get 60fps, to edit i used VideoPad
I think 60fps looks good in the slow mo scene. So why can't we have a dynamic FPS Video Format where you have 24 FPS most of the time, but for some specific scenes it can go up to 60FPS.
More fps are more noticeable with fast motion (perhaps also the reason why it doesn't loose immersion according to the comments, since there's still a lot of blurr from the object going a relatively big distance during the exposure of 1 frame) Atleast in my opinion though slow motion already looks like it is at higher fps, because there is barely to no motion blur and smooth motion is already there at low fps (I think it could even look better, if fps were lowered, the intro of Deadpool 2 for example didn't look good in my opinion ). High fps are more comparable to real life though and could be good in documentaries and stuff, where you want the effect of looking at something real through a camera.
I guess for cinema 24p feels more authentic but for home tv, especially on oled 60p is much better and smoother and also more comfortable for eyes. Pls more 4K movies on 60p 👌🏻😎
I'm gonna guess it's something psychological because I'm the type to play a game at 60, but record my screen at 30. Whenever I watch the footage of the game at 30, it doesn't look different than when I was actually playing the game, but if I recorded the video at 60 and then watched that video, I would be like, "Was it really that smooth?"
You're not controlling the movement, that's why it seems smoother. Watching this video, the 60 FPS version seems pretty much perfectly smooth, but playing a fast-paced video game at 60 FPS can be a little suboptimal. I think it has to do with 'responsiveness', which isn't a factor in movies.
@@dr.vishantpriyadarshi7050 Movies are not manipulatable the same way games are. Games are supposed to mimic the eyesight of being there, whereas cinema induces the nostalgic quality of watching a memory play out inside of your mind You’re confusing two different aesthetics
Nah, I disagree. 24 fps is so historically cinematic that anything above that feels wrong. The Hobbit films in 48 fps look like expensive LARP videos to me, not fantasy films. Fast framerates make you feel immersed the wrong way. In Gemini Man many viewers felt like they were on a film set watching actors instead of watching a cinematic story. This is a very difficult thing to overcome.
Exceptional narrow mind in all comments. Just because that is something new, people start talking shit. You all are so predictable like a sheep herd basically, no wonder you are being manipulated by governments like children.
60 fps looks so much more beautiful. like 2x better looking. 24 feels dated and stuck in its ways unable to assimilate new ways of seeing the world. 60 fps makes it look far sharper, higher-end looking, and more future-proof. Plus, on a production stand point, it makes the actors look way better. from an investment stand point of how someone looks on screen, 60fps is a better idea.
Bullshit, it looks like "behind the scenes" footage. From an investment standpoint, i dont want makeup to look like makeup, & all the defects during production to shine thru.
the movie was shot at 120fps, and it was sold on blu-ray at 60fps, I just ripped the files and compared it to the streaming version, which is 28fps, I didn't do interpolation or use software to get 60fps
@@VladOnEarth But the motion blur (usually using a 180 degree shutter angle) that you see in 24fps, makes the motion look smooth and often in a more convincing way than the actual smoother motion of 60fps.
The “You’re just not used to it yet” argument is such BS. We all operate every day on 60 fps monitors watching TH-cam vlogs in 30 fps or more. And some of us playing games in 144HZ or more. Trust me, we know and enjoy high frame rates for many things, but movies will never be one of them. There’s literally a reason it’s been rejected as the widespread standard delivery in theaters this hard.
60fps action looks better imo. In most action sequences I just zone off because there's not anything particularly interesting story wise going on. Just the same old guys punching each other, shooting at each other, quite frankly it's boring. The fast camera movements and fast panning especially don't look good in 24fps. This movie's action feels more interesting and exciting in comparison.
To my eyes, the 24fps looks better, with the exception of the show motion minigun choas at the end, that did seem to have more depth and detail on the 60fps footage. Also, on the 24fps it looked a lot more like Will Smith on motorcycle, where as on the 60fps footage, I could clearly see it was a stunt man and not will smith at one point. The motion blur of 24fps, definitely helps to hide the use of stunt doubles in fast moving action scenes.
60 fps looks way better, I still don't understand why the industry is capped at that lossy 24 fps. Must be all the old people that are used to old movies and production costs since at 60 fps you actually can't hide some flaws in production, otherwise i don't understand it..
The movie was shot at 120 FPS and was released on Bluray at 60 FPS, I just put the two versions (24 FPS and 60FPS) side by side. More information here: Format : Matroska Format version : Version 4 / Version 2 File size : 70.5 GiB Duration : 1 h 57 min Overall bit rate mode : Variable Overall bit rate : 86.3 Mb/s Movie name : Gemini Man (2019) Encoded date : UTC 2020-01-05 00:23:40 Writing application : mkvmerge v42.0.0 ('Overtime') 64-bit Writing library : libebml v1.3.10 + libmatroska v1.5.2 IMDB : tt1025100 TMDB : movie/453405 Video ID : 1 Format : HEVC Format/Info : High Efficiency Video Coding Format profile : Main 10@L5.1@High HDR format : SMPTE ST 2086, HDR10 compatible Codec ID : V_MPEGH/ISO/HEVC Duration : 1 h 57 min Bit rate : 81.0 Mb/s Width : 3 840 pixels Height : 2 160 pixels Display aspect ratio : 16:9 Frame rate mode : Constant Frame rate : 59.940 (60000/1001) FPS Color space : YUV Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0 (Type 2) Bit depth : 10 bits Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.163 Stream size : 66.2 GiB (94%) Title : MPEG-H HEVC Video / 80973 kbps / 2160p / 59.940 fps / 16:9 / Main 10 @ Level 5.1 @ High / 10 bits / HDR10 / BT.2020 Language : English Default : Yes Forced : No Color range : Limited Color primaries : BT.2020 Transfer characteristics : PQ Matrix coefficients : BT.2020 non-constant Mastering display color primar : Display P3 Mastering display luminance : min: 0.0010 cd/m2, max: 1000 cd/m2 Maximum Content Light Level : 5180 cd/m2 Maximum Frame-Average Light Le : 1577 cd/m2
IMO, movies in 60fps look better once you've seen several hours of footage and gotten more used to it. Then when you see a 24fps movie it's almost headache inducing, so much of the movie is blurry and out of focus! It's awful. Part of the reason it looks bad is because the industry isn't used to it. Actors in particular. But actors would improve and learn how to act in ways that are more believable in 60fps. Actors in 60fps look to me kinda like actors in the silent films of the past. Actors learned how to improve at 24fps, they'd do it again at 60fps.
Can't believe how brain washed people are, 60 FPS looked so much better the action was so smooth I felt like I wasn't watching it through a screen. You only like 24 FPS because it's what you grow up with and for some reason believe all the artsy cinema bs which to me is just an excuse to keep a poor viewer experience.
its literally because its what we are used to. IIRC 16fps was going to be the standard until they added sound to films. I think a happy middle ground is if films and shows used a variable refresh that way the film maker can chose which they think looks best.
Old TVs shows had 60 frames per second by default, because of how tv worked, soap operas were filmed in a format that had 60 frames per second. 60 frames per second media isnt something new,. Also old cameras were better because of how they capture stuff, new ones are inferior, but i dont see the 60 frames people complaint about how things actually do look faker now, because how cameras work now as how they used to.
24fps is only good on movies, while 60fps is for gaming. 8K is totally unnecessary right now! People still own Full-HD (1080p) displays and some are barely upgrading to 4K displays in the meantime.
And yet every time cinemas try to push that onto us, they result in box-office bombs like this movie right above us LOL Sounds like you need to reevaluate your predictions of the future 😬
@@corpsefoot758 listen, the "24 frames per second standard" only exists because it was used in really old films, where equipment to record in 60 didn't exist. there's no reason to NOT switch to 60/120/240 yet films still use 24 because it's the "fiLM LoOk!!". Fucking insane.
@@acombo Even if 24 was first invented because of technological limitation, it SURVIVED because they coincidentally invoked audiences’ visual nostalgia, not real-time vision. They play on memories, not input, hence cinema’s famed immersive power Otherwise, the entire world would have just adopted HFR decades ago. If you disagree, feel free to go out and make an HFR film yourself. There’s no serious money in it for any filmmaker with a brain, and there’s a very good reason why
@@corpsefoot758 hey play on memories, not input, hence cinema’s famed immersive power. I JUST TOLD YOU THIS: yet films still use 24 because it's the "fiLM LoOk!!". Fucking insane. It doesn't make sense, it's just stupid nostalgia forcing movies to not be as good as they could be.
![Smoother animation ≠ Better animation [read description]](/img/n.gif)
IMO, 60 fps makes it look like a cheap production, and not the good kind, except for minigun scene, that was dope in 60 fps.
After interpolating part of a movie to 190fps and watching it, yeah both of these versions look cheap, just that one is Microsoft Powerpoint edition and the other one is Powerpoint Premium
@@venturoes1912 They should've made it like 40 or 48fps instead imo
we are not used too yet..
@ That is nothing but you saying this is what I am use to in film, and has nothing to do with the quality of what is on screen. Nothing more then a "i'm not use to it reaction".
@ No idea what you are saying either tbh. "Cinematic" doesn't mean anything specific - at most it means "what I associate with movies" - which isn't bad or good, it's just an association you have. Someone trained you that way. "Cheap" isn't really what I get either, since that train very much isn't, and since I know that higher framerates requires more expensive equipment.
That close-up on the gunner feels like a Twisted Metal Black cutscene.
60fps looks like a video game cutscene
cause videogames are naturally on 60 fps.....????
@@Ralismyname yeah, but since not many action movies shot in 60fps, it does feel weird to see one and the guy is mentioning that it feels like a game cutscene because how rare it is. Especially on 1:44
Na 24fps much better 60fps makes it look like your on set watching them act
funny cuz i prefer 60 for that reason, to me is much better , but everyone with their own, have a good life
@@hedhog963 , could you please elaborate a bit? Why are you so eager to lose the story immersion and feel like watching actors act instead? When I watched Gemini Man in 60 fps, the whole movie felt like painfully artificial. Cinema is so inherently artificial as an art form that the closer it looks like actual visual input, the more it distances me from experiencing its actual storytelling.
@@jcp1984again Amen
24 FPS feels like “dreaming out loud” to me, whereas 60 feels like spying on actors lol
60fps looks like a TH-camr movie or something. HFR is nice, but i guess movies are supposed to be 24fps because we are used to seeing it that way. Idk what makes it uncanny, 24fps is better. Though i watch every movie in 1.2x speed so this reply can suck ass.
correction: TH-camr vlog. I don't want to remember TH-camr the movie ever again.
60 fps does look stunning for some shots like the heavy firing one and the bike follow shot. But its not working at all for the talkie portions. I feel like I'm standing on the set and watching them talk but cannot control my head movement. 24 fps takes us to a cinematic universe with more motion blurs than in real life. Humans love to see unique visuals when compared to real life visuals. But i also found that even some high action shots looked great in 24fps. Hope they come up with a film in which 60fps or 120fps are used for only certain high action shots and the remaining stays 24fps. I know that a full film final output is not possible to be taken in different fps's for different shots. But I just hope we figure that out somehow.
Into The Spiderverse was animated at 30fps while some scenes were at 60fps for emphasis. It worked very well for them with the most memorable scene of Miles Morales jumping off the high building being a 60fps shot
@@MrBumpalicious is it real?, bc then we would have to donload thousands of double frames just to watch the rest of the movie if im not mistaken and that would just double the movie storage
@@juanchi3559 sorry i was wrong. its animated at 12fps like animes are, and then in scenes it goes to 24fps. I had heard it doubled fps in some scenes and wrongly assumed it was 30 to 60
@@MrBumpalicious thats still super cool though, I want to experiment with frame rates on my own videos and see whats possible.
The action portions in 60fps are actually worse so painful to keep up.. strains the eyes 👁 heavily
Even though these are the exact same resolution, I didn't notice the obvious stuntman on the dirtbike in the 24 fps version, just in the 60.
More frames to notice
its because the there is less motion detail at 24fps your eye has less information in the same amount of time vs a higher frame rate. thus things in motion are harder to perceive.
I noticed it was a stuntman mainly because when he shouts "move MOVE" you cant actually see anything move. Usually when someones shouting you can see at least partial movement from what little you can see of their jaw, and maybe some muscles in the neck etc.
1:25 feels like playing gta 10
OMG 60FPS is just like Real Life Man, Some people don't like it because everyone watched movies in 24FPS till 2020
pretty
Till 2050, 60 fps ain't happened in the past few years & it ain't gonna start tommorow 🤣😂
Seen 60fps in 2012 was wondering why their TV was messed up & walked away now I know it's called 60fps
The high frame rate made me feel less dizzy and it was easier for my eyes to keep up with the action scenes!
Not sure what top commenter are even talking about. 60fps is simply clearly superior and reduces eye strain greatly too. 🤦🏻♂️ obviously it is clearly better too, which is why Avatar2 will be 60fps or more. Sad to see how narrow minded people are and not able to understand new technology if this is not something they are not used too. 🤦🏻♂️
My eyes are strained from 60fps fast movement jumping into multiple cut scenes very fast just horrible for anyone's eyesight why movies don't look like this in theater would get sued from all the seizures 60fps would induce
I think the pan at 0:14 and 1:21 allow the best comparision. It really eliminates that jitter and blur at 60 FPS. For the rest of it though, I don't think either really have much of an advantage interms of immersion. 24-30 FPS usually just wins by default because people are used to it.
if i could i'd watch all movies in 60 fps
Weird how the masses are still clinging to a framerate established back in the 1920's. I'm over it. Give me smooth panning and end the horrible strobing caused by shooting at a framerate too slow for the human eye.
It was established back in the 1920s?? Then it must be bad!
Maybe some people just prefer the heavier, more filmic look of 24 frames and are somehow not bothered by the "horrible strobing."
A brain rotted by PC Master Race worms. Keep your opinions out of film, and I’ll keep my opinions out of gaming.
Feels like a travel film with a DJI osmo in 60fps
High frames aren't meant for movies. They look so unreal and staged. The bike chase looked slower in 60fps.. while in 25fps the motion blur added a sense of more speed.
How can higher frame rates look "unreal"? Does your world stutter when you move your head around? ;)
@@spyro440 thats not how that works
@@spyro440 ya they're just not used to it. Give them time.
@@spyro440 Actually yes, that's basically how vision works. Look around a room, you'll find that your eyes have difficulty smoothly 'tracking' across a room without fixating on a single point. When you look from one thing to another, your brain uses your peripherals to basically 'simulate' the in-between space. Frame rates like 24 fps do a good job at imitating the choppiness of real vision. If an object is staying in the same place in frame, it'll remain sharp. 60fps+ on the other hand, will capture the entire frame with clarity. But when your eyes are watching a screen, they don't create a natural motion blur like you'd see in real life, because your eyes are fixated on a single point - the screen. So the entire thing feels unnaturally clear.
So while your eyes don't have 'motion blur' per se, motion blur is probably the closest analog you'll get to how the human eye works.
Ok, if either of these versions look real to you, please go to an eye doctor, you need help.
I personally prefer the higher FPS
60 looks like a soap opera
Im predominantly a gamer than a movie person, and I find 24FPS hurting my eye after getting used to 60FPS.But I get what many of you, who are used to with 24FPS, feel.
Dang 60 looks so much more real lol. I wish all movies were in 60
So you be the only watching them 😂
Turn on whatever motion interpolations your tv has. Most people can’t stand sped up frame rates.
@@NativeSon253 But those are fake frames. I would never solely because of the artefacts. Maybe in sport you would sacrifice having artefacts for smoother motion.
I don’t. Filmmakers have stuck to 24 or 25fps specifically to give it a “movie” feel. 60fps looks too real, like it’s a documentary or a comedy.
60fps feels like I’m playing a PS5 game honestly
Great video! I'm fascinated!
What editing program did you use, and what steps did you take to acheive this 60 fps?
the movie was shot at 120fps, and it was sold on blu-ray at 60fps, I just ripped the files and compared it to the streaming version, which is 28fps, I didn't do interpolation or use software to get 60fps, to edit i used VideoPad
60 looks sharp 24 look blurry like some old VHS tape lol
Heck I cannot go back after using my display and it's 165Hz(aka 165fps) ...watching a movie with 23.97 or something is annoying
I think 60fps looks good in the slow mo scene. So why can't we have a dynamic FPS Video Format where you have 24 FPS most of the time, but for some specific scenes it can go up to 60FPS.
More fps are more noticeable with fast motion (perhaps also the reason why it doesn't loose immersion according to the comments, since there's still a lot of blurr from the object going a relatively big distance during the exposure of 1 frame)
Atleast in my opinion though slow motion already looks like it is at higher fps, because there is barely to no motion blur and smooth motion is already there at low fps (I think it could even look better, if fps were lowered, the intro of Deadpool 2 for example didn't look good in my opinion ).
High fps are more comparable to real life though and could be good in documentaries and stuff, where you want the effect of looking at something real through a camera.
I guess for cinema 24p feels more authentic but for home tv, especially on oled 60p is much better and smoother and also more comfortable for eyes. Pls more 4K movies on 60p 👌🏻😎
Most painful thing I experienced in eyes 👁 trying to keep up to 60fps... it's worse than looking at bright lights
Yes, especially if you got used to using your computer or cell phone at 120hz, once you get used to it, 24fps seems stuttery
@@UnicornRyder04 guess you are blind than cause it looks great to me
@@kennypowers1945 nice to know you love it 🚮 lol.. ENJOY MORE FOR YOU.. you be 1 out of 2 people at the movies looking for 60 fps movies 😂
I think it would be better if they were 30fps
I still dont get why 24 fps dont Seem laggy on movies? But pc game is unplayable on 24 fps? How? 😅
I'm gonna guess it's something psychological because I'm the type to play a game at 60, but record my screen at 30. Whenever I watch the footage of the game at 30, it doesn't look different than when I was actually playing the game, but if I recorded the video at 60 and then watched that video, I would be like, "Was it really that smooth?"
You're not controlling the movement, that's why it seems smoother. Watching this video, the 60 FPS version seems pretty much perfectly smooth, but playing a fast-paced video game at 60 FPS can be a little suboptimal. I think it has to do with 'responsiveness', which isn't a factor in movies.
Input lag is much worse.
24 fps > movie effect - 60fps > smartphone effect
U mean gaming effect?
@@dr.vishantpriyadarshi7050 Movies are not manipulatable the same way games are. Games are supposed to mimic the eyesight of being there, whereas cinema induces the nostalgic quality of watching a memory play out inside of your mind
You’re confusing two different aesthetics
25fps is better thab 24 fps
@@jadoo782002able But 24 is better than 25
I wish every movie was shot with 60fps. Looks so much scrisper.
The usual refresh rate is washed out and straining on the eyes.
Amen, one comment that makes sense and not from the sheep refusing anything they are not familiar with.
It looks like I'm playing GTA 5 with shaders
i don’t give a fuck bout people saying 24fps is more cinematic than 60 thats yours..
but for me 60 is lit
Just try 48fps. You'll be surprised. 48fps suits perfectly for films.
Indeed, 48 fps looks perfect
24fps - slideshow
48fps - slideshow premium
60fps - slideshow deluxe edition
@@venturoes1912 I kinda like 48 and 60 fps, but what do you think about 120 fps? Barely enough (minimum?), not enough?
@@dignes3446 That's like when it's actually smooth
Nah, I disagree. 24 fps is so historically cinematic that anything above that feels wrong. The Hobbit films in 48 fps look like expensive LARP videos to me, not fantasy films. Fast framerates make you feel immersed the wrong way. In Gemini Man many viewers felt like they were on a film set watching actors instead of watching a cinematic story. This is a very difficult thing to overcome.
60 makes it look cartoony
video gamey
Just wait until you see real life. It's in infinite fps!
That moment with the bike (60fps) looks like a videogame bruh
Exceptional narrow mind in all comments. Just because that is something new, people start talking shit. You all are so predictable like a sheep herd basically, no wonder you are being manipulated by governments like children.
TH-cam video vs movie it feels like
60 fps looks so much more beautiful. like 2x better looking. 24 feels dated and stuck in its ways unable to assimilate new ways of seeing the world.
60 fps makes it look far sharper, higher-end looking, and more future-proof. Plus, on a production stand point, it makes the actors look way better. from an investment stand point of how someone looks on screen, 60fps is a better idea.
looked like a video game
@@leovitoo Because u aren't used to higher frame rates in movies.
Bullshit, it looks like "behind the scenes" footage. From an investment standpoint, i dont want makeup to look like makeup, & all the defects during production to shine thru.
@@J0SHUAKANE Still no arguments. Only subjective opinions.
@@SuliPlayGames no, it shows more detail. Thats not an opinion.
By which software you done this 60fps?
the movie was shot at 120fps, and it was sold on blu-ray at 60fps, I just ripped the files and compared it to the streaming version, which is 28fps, I didn't do interpolation or use software to get 60fps
@@rafaelmanarin1403 ok 🥰
24 fps looks way better
60 fps looks good only in slow motions
If you like watching pictures instead of smooth motion, then watch 10fps maybe, or just read comics 🤦🏻♂️
@@VladOnEarth But the motion blur (usually using a 180 degree shutter angle) that you see in 24fps, makes the motion look smooth and often in a more convincing way than the actual smoother motion of 60fps.
The “You’re just not used to it yet” argument is such BS.
We all operate every day on 60 fps monitors watching TH-cam vlogs in 30 fps or more. And some of us playing games in 144HZ or more.
Trust me, we know and enjoy high frame rates for many things, but movies will never be one of them. There’s literally a reason it’s been rejected as the widespread standard delivery in theaters this hard.
60fps is worse than strobe lights 😂 seizure inducing animation 60fps.. if people like pain go for 60fps
This frame rate is that high it blew my hair off.
60 fps looks like a telenovella.
True looks like Polish "M jak milość" LOL
60fps action looks better imo. In most action sequences I just zone off because there's not anything particularly interesting story wise going on. Just the same old guys punching each other, shooting at each other, quite frankly it's boring. The fast camera movements and fast panning especially don't look good in 24fps. This movie's action feels more interesting and exciting in comparison.
To my eyes, the 24fps looks better, with the exception of the show motion minigun choas at the end, that did seem to have more depth and detail on the 60fps footage. Also, on the 24fps it looked a lot more like Will Smith on motorcycle, where as on the 60fps footage, I could clearly see it was a stunt man and not will smith at one point. The motion blur of 24fps, definitely helps to hide the use of stunt doubles in fast moving action scenes.
32k views and only 10 subs c'mon guys really?
60 fps makes it look like a comedy
& 60fps painful to watch, there are crazies out there that enjoy this 🤣
@@UnicornRyder04 higher framerate is nicer on the eyes but worse on the brain
@@UnicornRyder04 ikr it looks so bad and weird. IDK how people enjoy watching stuff at 60 fps.
@@painexotic3757 Because motion looks more like reality at 60 fps and you notice more detail, but that's not necessarily a good thing for immersion
24 fps is cinematic, 60 fps is soap opera. Higher fps doesn't mean better.
60 fps looks way better, I still don't understand why the industry is capped at that lossy 24 fps. Must be all the old people that are used to old movies and production costs since at 60 fps you actually can't hide some flaws in production, otherwise i don't understand it..
F what you guys are saying.
No hostility will affect me.
60 FPS is awesome
ikr
60 fps looks like its shot in mobile camera
why do the movements feel so unnatural at 60fps, clearly there's some loss of info or someone is interpolating this.
The movie was shot at 120 FPS and was released on Bluray at 60 FPS, I just put the two versions (24 FPS and 60FPS) side by side.
More information here:
Format : Matroska
Format version : Version 4 / Version 2
File size : 70.5 GiB
Duration : 1 h 57 min
Overall bit rate mode : Variable
Overall bit rate : 86.3 Mb/s
Movie name : Gemini Man (2019)
Encoded date : UTC 2020-01-05 00:23:40
Writing application : mkvmerge v42.0.0 ('Overtime') 64-bit
Writing library : libebml v1.3.10 + libmatroska v1.5.2
IMDB : tt1025100
TMDB : movie/453405
Video
ID : 1
Format : HEVC
Format/Info : High Efficiency Video Coding
Format profile : Main 10@L5.1@High
HDR format : SMPTE ST 2086, HDR10 compatible
Codec ID : V_MPEGH/ISO/HEVC
Duration : 1 h 57 min
Bit rate : 81.0 Mb/s
Width : 3 840 pixels
Height : 2 160 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 59.940 (60000/1001) FPS
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0 (Type 2)
Bit depth : 10 bits
Bits/(Pixel*Frame) : 0.163
Stream size : 66.2 GiB (94%)
Title : MPEG-H HEVC Video / 80973 kbps / 2160p / 59.940 fps / 16:9 / Main 10 @ Level 5.1 @ High / 10 bits / HDR10 / BT.2020
Language : English
Default : Yes
Forced : No
Color range : Limited
Color primaries : BT.2020
Transfer characteristics : PQ
Matrix coefficients : BT.2020 non-constant
Mastering display color primar : Display P3
Mastering display luminance : min: 0.0010 cd/m2, max: 1000 cd/m2
Maximum Content Light Level : 5180 cd/m2
Maximum Frame-Average Light Le : 1577 cd/m2
60fps looks like behind the scenes of making the film itself.
60 seems brighter and more colorful.
*el O el AT THE TWO CRAWLING AT HIGH SPEED IN THE STORE, LIKE A 1920s FILM*
*el O el AT THE GUY ON THE MOTORBIKE WHO CLEARLY IS NOT MORON WILL SMITH*
24 FPS : Feels like watching Quentine Tarantino's film
60FPS : Feels like watching George Lucas's film
George Lucas never made a movie in 60 fps, what does this even mean
@@JulianTheOwl George Lucas always try to make something shiny and new everytime he made a sequel.
Every movie should be 60fps
Thats why movies or shows are so weird on tv for some reason.
I hate humanity
24 frames is way more cinematic and the motion blur is better
its just what you are used to. 24fps looks blurry and choppy.
@@NGEvangeliman just like things do in real life when they are moving. 60 FPS is too clear and makes it visibly not real.
@@morz3564 it looks good to me
I LOOOVE 60 fps 24 looks stupid for me
24fps for cinema, 60fps for games. That's all.
244fps for games
@@BloodborneGuy 24fps for cinema, ̶6̶0̶f̶p̶s̶ 244fps for games. That's all.
@@AlessandroNofi Ü
@@BloodborneGuywho has a 244 Hz monitor? I don't think they exist.
@@CasabaHowitzer have you tried even checking Amazon my dude? Yes 240hz monitors exist 🤣
60fps looks like bbc documentary
Motion blur key cinema
60 way better
60 fps looks amateur
it just looks like it's sped up......dont understand why this is being pushed into cinema.
60 fps looks like playing video game.
60 fps looks disgusting
yeah movies are better in 24 fps marvel looks good in 60 tho i j8ust play in 240 fps but movies yeah 24 fps
24 fps is dead 💀
60 fps has that typical cheap soap opera effect and acting looks bad.
25 everywere
I vote for 60 fps.
@ Amen. Looks like backstage footage lmao
For pain 60fps is great
Wow realmente considero este un momento porcho
IMO, movies in 60fps look better once you've seen several hours of footage and gotten more used to it. Then when you see a 24fps movie it's almost headache inducing, so much of the movie is blurry and out of focus! It's awful.
Part of the reason it looks bad is because the industry isn't used to it. Actors in particular. But actors would improve and learn how to act in ways that are more believable in 60fps.
Actors in 60fps look to me kinda like actors in the silent films of the past. Actors learned how to improve at 24fps, they'd do it again at 60fps.
60 fps strains the eyes from how fast everything moves in a small area & jumping to multiple scenes... very paifnul
60 fps makes the scenes look like a TV movie.
It's 60 for me.
60 fps is sooo bad
Can't believe how brain washed people are, 60 FPS looked so much better the action was so smooth I felt like I wasn't watching it through a screen. You only like 24 FPS because it's what you grow up with and for some reason believe all the artsy cinema bs which to me is just an excuse to keep a poor viewer experience.
its literally because its what we are used to. IIRC 16fps was going to be the standard until they added sound to films. I think a happy middle ground is if films and shows used a variable refresh that way the film maker can chose which they think looks best.
It’s not that bad to have a preference though
You’re brain washed by 60 fps people ironically. 60 fps is shit. Makes it look like someone slipping on ice. Too smooth. Moderation is key to life
If you like pain go for 60fps...
@@UnicornRyder04 no pain at all
There's no sense of speed in 60 fps. Looks like a slo-mo but in normal speed.
Old TVs shows had 60 frames per second by default, because of how tv worked, soap operas were filmed in a format that had 60 frames per second.
60 frames per second media isnt something new,.
Also old cameras were better because of how they capture stuff, new ones are inferior, but i dont see the 60 frames people complaint about how things actually do look faker now, because how cameras work now as how they used to.
24fps forever. 48, 50 or 60 is a Venezuelan TV soap drama. Basically it looks like the interlaced.
Hate 60fps, and hate that every movie and tv show they convert to more than original 24fps!!! Absolutely hate 8k !
24fps is only good on movies, while 60fps is for gaming. 8K is totally unnecessary right now! People still own Full-HD (1080p) displays and some are barely upgrading to 4K displays in the meantime.
60 frames makes it look cheap I gotta say. Not sure why Ang is seemingly obsessed with turning a movie into a real life video game
the panning does look off because we arent used to it, but the motion clarity is so much better.
@@NGEvangeliman if you like pain 😂
60 frames looks ass.
This movie should have been shot at 0fps
60 is the future
Nope
And yet every time cinemas try to push that onto us, they result in box-office bombs like this movie right above us LOL
Sounds like you need to reevaluate your predictions of the future 😬
@@corpsefoot758 listen, the "24 frames per second standard" only exists because it was used in really old films, where equipment to record in 60 didn't exist. there's no reason to NOT switch to 60/120/240 yet films still use 24 because it's the "fiLM LoOk!!". Fucking insane.
@@acombo
Even if 24 was first invented because of technological limitation, it SURVIVED because they coincidentally invoked audiences’ visual nostalgia, not real-time vision. They play on memories, not input, hence cinema’s famed immersive power
Otherwise, the entire world would have just adopted HFR decades ago. If you disagree, feel free to go out and make an HFR film yourself. There’s no serious money in it for any filmmaker with a brain, and there’s a very good reason why
@@corpsefoot758 hey play on memories, not input, hence cinema’s famed immersive power. I JUST TOLD YOU THIS: yet films still use 24 because it's the "fiLM LoOk!!". Fucking insane. It doesn't make sense, it's just stupid nostalgia forcing movies to not be as good as they could be.
Rp
240hz monitor user here, both look like a slideshow, not watching movies anymore without interpolation to atleast 120+ :/
me too bro, stuttering everywhere, i can't watch movies at 24fps anymore :/
The eye can only see 120 fps there is no advantage to anything higher than that at that point you are just wasting time
@@rafaelmanarin1403 if there's stuttering everywhere your internet must be very shitty
@@fazehank5311 Bruh 120fps looks choppy to me, as an owner of a 240hz monitor...
@@fazehank5311 You know you’re a troll when you say the eye can only see a certain frame rate.
60fps suck, 25fps god
come on....this look like a playstation game,this is hollywood decadence.