Piaget on How we Learn and Develop | Jordan Peterson
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.พ. 2021
- Jordan Peterson talks about the great developmental psychologist Jean Piaget, who was interested, above all, in the way that knowledge is generated and transforms. His analysis of the development of morality in children, which relates early play to social cooperation and competition, is particularly profound. In this part he particularly talks about learning and development.
#Peterson #Piaget #Psychology
Check out the full lecture here, from his “2017 Personality 06: Jean Piaget & Constructivism”: • 2017 Personality 06: J...
-
If you like the content, subscribe!
do anyone else gets a feeling of pure joy out of listening to this guy?
You're substituting him for religious authority, that's why.
No matter whether you disagree with his ideas/claims or not, he deserves your respect of his intellect and wisdom
The very definition of a masterclass!
To keep it very simple, what a cool snippet of how we try to make it.
3:50
This idea of weave a shared narrative and inhabit that
is fascinating.
Damnnn.....😅😅😅this guy is brilliant
This man has thousands of hour's of videos of him teaching. I remember one video of him speaking for 3 hours just to answer one question. Do you believe in God.? He doesn't like that question.
He thinks that the question is so important that it doesn't warrant a two minute answer. What's interesting is how high a value he places on belief while not himself being a believer.
The question is not that simple as a yes or no answer . While you are correct that he says he doesn't think that he also says God would be disappointed in him. The idea of God is most important not the belief because people act out their beliefs and the relationship between God and human is personal so it really doesn't matter what anyone else says.
"Transjective"
MIndgasm
The left has no absolutes and clouds evrrything with feelings. Feelings and facts are two different things and marriage is defined contract. Juristic societies operate by contract and ethical societies run on feeling and nothing is strictly defined except the wishes of ruling class. Ruling class wants us all separate and unable to contract so we lose reason and can only be led out of confusion by our rulers.
He is crazy
What he says to this point is unfair to all people 6:00+ he is just describing the old 'patriarchy' which actually men know does not benefit them because there are just as many woman criminals as men and 'patriarchy' is really just women benefiting from 'mens' crimes by enabling and imitating their crimes
Now we are dealing with a mental health epidemic so he is completely wrong because no one would ever suggest to me that my family that has criminal records for abusing me as a child was acting out of my best interest or anyones best interest so what he says is unfair to all people
Incoherent. I dont know what he said. He is incoherent
Your problem is known as the Dunning Kruger Effect.
You would not understand it either.
I make 150k doing analytics for major us company. If i dont understand it then his presentation is sh#tty anyway
@@piaoliang5467 I'm sure you have a great training in understanding relatively complex software and mathematical problems. That usually comes as a very structured and straightforward way of learning and problema solving.
The way Peterson communicates is not that structured. He paints a mosaic. Some people do have a problem with it, I think he mentioned it in the past. He doesnt usually answer questions in the way we are used to as well. A lot of times there is not one very clear narrative to the answer, but rather a path going up and across multiple areas of knowledge, trying to bring as much knowledge and strength to the mutual understanding of a certain problem.
He is far from incoherent. May be just not what you expect.
Have you ever considered the possibility that when you cannot understand another, the cause of that might lay within yourself?
Incoherent. He starts talking about A but immediately diverges to talk about B, and just two sentences into B he jumps on to C. At very beginning of the video, when he says the work ‘’Kant” he is already on C. It is ompossible to follow him because he is not coherent. It is precisely because i can actually follow him i can see he is incoherent. People who are dumber dont even see what he is doing, and confuse his incoherent presentation with extreme complexity or something. Write down his first 5 sentences and tell me how the 5th sentence is related to the first. Incoherent. My literature teacher would fail him immediately
He's so weird.