Greatest Philosophers in History | Martin Heidegger

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 188

  • @Eternalised
    @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    Enjoy these type of videos? Please give it a like
    Support this channel: www.patreon.com/eternalised
    TH-cam Member Perks: th-cam.com/channels/qos1tl0RntucGGtPXNxkkA.htmljoin
    Donate a Coffee: ko-fi.com/eternalised
    PayPal: www.paypal.com/paypalme/eternalisedofficial
    Official Merch: eternalised.creator-spring.com

  • @shengcer
    @shengcer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +30

    In Taoism, it is famously said “The immortal rule can not be told; the forever name can not be named…” I think Heidegger invented so many words for the same reason. His thought is at the very edge of what language could express. Great video, it is a shame this series seems to end here.

    • @Jide-bq9yf
      @Jide-bq9yf 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I agree . You don’t need to read much Heidegger if you’re focused on our temporality as much as he advocates . Then the gates of Being open up and an authentic existence is the only path we’ll want to tread . There’ll be no room for anything else .

  • @InfinitiSin
    @InfinitiSin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    My Dasein shall be to enjoy this fantastic upload.
    Also, this being a reminder to finish reading Being and Time.

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Haha, thanks friend!!

  • @jk.studios
    @jk.studios 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    This channel WILL blow up. Just remember, to remember us, those who are here who pushed this channel up. Truly

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Thank you! Your support means a lot to me. You guys are what keeps this channel alive :)

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I do not know why
      but it feels good
      to blow things up
      sometimes.

    • @mjolninja9358
      @mjolninja9358 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Correction: SHALL*

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mjolninja9358 mistake is natural
      But regret is foolish.

    • @MiloMay
      @MiloMay ปีที่แล้ว +3

      And it did!

  • @PhilosophyToons
    @PhilosophyToons 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I was super excited for this one and it was great! Being in Time must've been a tough read but also very rewarding.

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Thanks!! I'm glad you liked it my friend

  • @jayabyss377
    @jayabyss377 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    this sounds like non-dualism philosophy, awesome!

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      Yep, object and subject are one. Non dualism at it's finest :)

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Emptiness is das truth because das truth is empty.
      Empty of what ?
      Empty of its own existence because we are 1!
      Emptiness is a vessel because every vessel is empty.
      Empty this boat so that it will go faster because it is lighter.

    • @bitkurd
      @bitkurd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The observer is the observed. You can not perceive yourself through your eyes, you can only perceive yourself through someone else’s eyes.

    • @Jide-bq9yf
      @Jide-bq9yf ปีที่แล้ว

      Definitely

    • @Jide-bq9yf
      @Jide-bq9yf ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Eternalisedmy sublimely articulate philosopher, hope you’re good . Relishing this gourmet serving once again .

  • @Garghamellal
    @Garghamellal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    You always edit brilliantly with appropriate music and appropriate images which convey the right feeling

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thanks a lot Garghamellal, means a lot to me!

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There are more fine arts in the world
      Than in eternalised videos.
      There are more great artists in the world than in Europe.
      There are more idols in the world
      Than in reality.

  • @celestilbernas972
    @celestilbernas972 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This is a great channel to everyone who wants or interested in these philosophers. Sometimes, I get bored with professors discussing these things (don't get me wrong, I learned). I like the narrator's voice, not too fast and I get to digest every detail without me having a good background of studying a philosophy class. Just a curious reader here!

  • @naseempark6135
    @naseempark6135 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Finally, I’ve been waiting for this one.

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks for the support Naseem!

    • @naseempark6135
      @naseempark6135 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Eternalised yeah, this must have taken an insane amount of work. Also congrats on 4K subs

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@naseempark6135 I did over-work myself quite a lot haha. Thanks a lot! :)

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Eternalised he who loves what he does
      Wears himself out doing it.

  • @leniepenie3419
    @leniepenie3419 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Man I love this channel everything is so well put and easy to understand!

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thanks a lot Lenie for the uplifting words!!

  • @Dacademeca
    @Dacademeca 3 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    Martin Heidegger was such an interesting philosopher.. I feel like he deserves more attention, great video and editing, and congrats on 4000 subs!

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Thanks a lot my friend!

    • @Garghamellal
      @Garghamellal 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      4000 subs?

    • @Dacademeca
      @Dacademeca 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Garghamellal ya he got 4000 subs

    • @thetaeater
      @thetaeater 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Heidegger was a crackpot charlatan like most of these 19th and early 20th centry philosophers. He is just twisting theology philosophy. The comment that mentions how it sounds like non-dualism is kinda contract except when you actually read his work he makes it sound like the individual is god (solipsism). Its funny because I Love Tilich's work but he is at least genuine. Back before the information age it was so easy to reframe a concept to make it like an original idea.

    • @vlnow
      @vlnow ปีที่แล้ว

      He was the only philosopher to blow my mind.
      I think 'we' don't talk about him much because of his later political alliances. Its almost taboo.

  • @The_Wanderer_And_His_Shadow
    @The_Wanderer_And_His_Shadow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Thank you for the good content! Because of works like that one, youtube is worth existing. I wish you many more subscribers. Greetings from Bulgaria!

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks a lot for your kind wishes!

  • @InspirationFromThePast
    @InspirationFromThePast 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Wow, the intro was very well done, loved it. Also I don't think that I heard about him before so thank you for bringing him to my attention and as always, your narration is pure gold. Congratulations on 4k Subscribers.

  • @stevenwonder7585
    @stevenwonder7585 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great channel, keep up the good work!

  • @lorenz6660
    @lorenz6660 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Muy buen video, gracias por seguir subiendo contenido 👌

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      ¡Gracias por el apoyo Lorenz!

  • @jkam2524
    @jkam2524 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey! You helped me finally understand Heidegger!!! Thank you!

  • @PsychedelicActualization
    @PsychedelicActualization 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    'The Fieldpath' was the first thing I read from Heidegger. Such an amazing dude ❤️

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Cool, will take a look at that one! Thanks

  • @renzostefanmp7937
    @renzostefanmp7937 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Heidegger is my favorite philosopher, it's glad to see him in this channel, saved this video to watch it in a couple of hours when I get free, I'm excited. Thanks!. Btw, I came from the Dostoevsky video, which was really great. I'm sure you'll get a lot of subscribers in the future.

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thank you very much! And welcome to the channel.

    • @bukurie6861
      @bukurie6861 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Martin Heidegger is Greatest Philosophers in History.He is human beings a modern epoch.Dasein is doing existencialal transformation Cultural.🌠🌠🌠🌠🌠!

  • @rickbenjamin1525
    @rickbenjamin1525 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Very good explained

  • @gclttlaichhun2262
    @gclttlaichhun2262 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great job..... Keep up the good work❤❤❤❤

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There is no fire like passion.

  • @surajchaudhary613
    @surajchaudhary613 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    do deleuze and guattari too, excellent work as usual! keep it up

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Thanks. Good suggestions Suraj. I'll be eventually be doing some post-modernism and psychoanalysis as well: Derrida, Lacan, Deleuze and Baudrillard. Although I have a lot of reading to do!

    • @surajchaudhary613
      @surajchaudhary613 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@Eternalised looking forward to it !

  • @AdamFraserTv
    @AdamFraserTv ปีที่แล้ว

    It’s been awhile since I’ve been excited by a piece of literature . Thank you for familiarizing me with this man . Way ahead of his time .

  • @frankchilds9848
    @frankchilds9848 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for this video gem 💎 I feel Heidegger can help many of us in our current time where we seem to have become unhinged from much we trusted before.

  • @dasociety129113
    @dasociety129113 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This philosopher seems so deeply arcane in his observations, very difficuly to understand, my brain was twisting through that whole video. Thanks again for your great videos

  • @FGP_Pro
    @FGP_Pro 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Martin Heidegger, the Rube Goldberg of philosophy.

  • @samn8309
    @samn8309 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was using my axe as a hammer. It broke. While I was experiencing ready-at-hand with the axe I'd have been better off with some present-at-hand first. Now I'm left with a broken axe which is a problem and I'm experiencing unreadiness-to-hand.
    Now I get it.

  • @BJCobbledick
    @BJCobbledick 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love so much of the art in your videos! Would it be possible for you to post the names of the works?

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thanks! I actually deleted my art folders cause I was running low on space. But if you like some in particular, I'll try to find them!

  • @tshibamo7971
    @tshibamo7971 ปีที่แล้ว

    Oh man this is so well thought out content

  • @titnesovic4522
    @titnesovic4522 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for this work. Heidegger seems to be more popular with each passing day.

  • @DeadEndFrog
    @DeadEndFrog 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    im always amazed how someone like him could embrace fascism, proably a huge reason for hannah arendts own philosophical inquires

  • @ejwoods2457
    @ejwoods2457 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is great! I’m actually trying to navigate my way through Being and Time which has proven profoundly difficult and rewarding. But this summary is enlightening. It helps me to have the entire structure and goal of the text “present-to-hand.”

    • @vlnow
      @vlnow ปีที่แล้ว

      I tried to read the original text. Its just way way too nuts. Intead i read a simple introduction to his ideas.

  • @jamiejones9156
    @jamiejones9156 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "I am. And there is thinking."
    - Ram Dass

  • @deepthin7480
    @deepthin7480 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Please make a video on Simone de Beauvoir . She deserves to be in the list. And honestly I have very less regard for Heidegger for his Nazism but I will try to see beyond that

  • @ratherrapid
    @ratherrapid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This becomes even more intereseting when reading Hanna Arendt, who, from what I've seen runs intellectual circles around H.

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Interesting, will have a look. Thank you.

  • @SeanLucasYT
    @SeanLucasYT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    All your videos interest me, but I was wondering, how did you get into this? Study it in university?

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Thanks Sean. I study it as a passion :)

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Eternalised without passion
      Existence is impossible.

  • @satnamo
    @satnamo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nothing is being because
    everything is interbeing
    since we are 1
    for everything is interconnected and interdependent on every ‘other’ things
    as demonstrated by Young Double Slit experiment,
    where the observer is inseparable from the observed electrons.

  • @RomancingTheData
    @RomancingTheData 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It sounds like Nietzsche and Heidegger should have a conversation; they have pretty similar ideas regarding conformity.

  • @paulkossak7761
    @paulkossak7761 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just purchased "being and time" and looking forward to dig in. I'm sure it will be extremely challenging.

  • @thecatmagnet2978
    @thecatmagnet2978 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent video

  •  2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I feel like I'll need to rewatch this video a couple of times until I make some sense of it

  • @bitkurd
    @bitkurd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am the center of circumference, therefore, I can not perceive myself through my eyes. I can only observe myself through someone else’s eyes.

  • @satnamo
    @satnamo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Authenticity means living my own most potential for being in timespace.

  • @damaplehound
    @damaplehound 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Drinking game: take a shot every time the word "being" is mentioned

  • @nadeemf3426
    @nadeemf3426 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    can you make a video on rene girard?

  • @danauckland9816
    @danauckland9816 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can anyone tell me the name of the artist at 8:07? I would like to get a copy.

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      "Erosion" created in 2000 by Jacek Yerka in Surrealism style.

    • @danauckland9816
      @danauckland9816 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Eternalised Thank you so much. I haven't come across his work before. Excellent interpretations of life's oddities imo. Love it. Thanks again. I am the author of 'Hannelore' - a slightly different take on the final months of WWII written in English.

  • @rishinarinemd
    @rishinarinemd 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for this great video! Does anyone know what the symbol on the front of the book means or what it is called? (18:51/24:15)

  • @dortesandal4303
    @dortesandal4303 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This Guy makes me highly neurotic and unusually self aware😵😂👍

  • @insidethewired
    @insidethewired 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    amazing

  • @GSingh12345
    @GSingh12345 ปีที่แล้ว

    Could you please suggest the primary books to read about Heidegger and his theories???

  • @B4no_shyyrosss
    @B4no_shyyrosss 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Can someone explain the difference of being in the world and being with others

  • @dustydesert1674
    @dustydesert1674 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    There’s just that problem of him joining the Nazi Party in 1933 and being anti-Semitic. The halo falls.

  • @ryokan9120
    @ryokan9120 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Yet another brilliant video and a truly brilliant philosopher. How unfortunate he turned out to be an unrepentant Nazi.

  • @joelvalentine3291
    @joelvalentine3291 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It is well explained, Can I get this word document.

  • @intotheether6518
    @intotheether6518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video!
    I especially liked how you brought up Heidegger's controversy. If anybody wants to explore this notion in more detail and from a philosophical perspective I have a video about it up on my channel (end of shameless plug haha)

  • @adaptercrash
    @adaptercrash 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Im surprised this hasn't been written like 200 years ago, well more than that..800...

  • @mac2phin
    @mac2phin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Regarding Heidegger's nazism, I like Woody Allen's films, but he married his daughter.

  • @20thcenturyfoxyoutube
    @20thcenturyfoxyoutube 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You will have to listen to this several times before anything starts to click

  • @Nunofurbiznus
    @Nunofurbiznus ปีที่แล้ว

    This has SOOOOOOO many ties to Pageaus work lol

  • @magrayfayaz1478
    @magrayfayaz1478 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great

  • @onlypearls4651
    @onlypearls4651 ปีที่แล้ว

    When the hammer breaks, it becomes a tent stake, and a fishing weight.

  • @metaspacecrownedbytime4579
    @metaspacecrownedbytime4579 ปีที่แล้ว

    I find it difficult to apply this thought on my own, as an individual.

  • @ipdavid1043
    @ipdavid1043 ปีที่แล้ว

    he ix so right about. modern days

  • @geoffreynhill2833
    @geoffreynhill2833 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bloody hell! Zeno's Tortoise? A Young Person's Guide to Granularity? Still, he manages to LOOK very knowing in his photographs...

  • @Big-guy1981
    @Big-guy1981 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sounds like a rehashing of Taoism.

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      True.
      He borrows it from
      The book of tea.

  • @debrasmith4675
    @debrasmith4675 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wasn’t labelling it “ the biggest stupidity of my life” a global apology give the way Heidegger uses words?
    What other apology would have sufficed?

  • @danlhendl
    @danlhendl ปีที่แล้ว

    I see the existential not the existentiell, Heidegger. 😅 I see the fallen not the fallenessness

  • @EclecticEngineer604
    @EclecticEngineer604 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @Henningfest
    @Henningfest 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the single frame at 4:48?

    • @Henningfest
      @Henningfest 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Seems to be an out of focus picture of a group of people.
      What significance does it have?

  • @RinatNugayev
    @RinatNugayev 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    12:47

  • @marcpadilla1094
    @marcpadilla1094 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Being There or a man for all.seasons is a movie about phenomenology or Heideggers' Desein .Stars Peter Sellers as a simpleton who's caretaker has died. Fir the first time in his life he's alone and begins to interact with people or rarher they begin to interact with him and because of his condition presume him to be a genius. Any way the philosophical message is authenticity vs inauthenticity. Sellers " Being " authentic in a fake world of great expectations.

    • @stephencarroll230
      @stephencarroll230 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes! And Jerzy Kosinski, the author, was very conscious of mob mentality and the horrors of political violence. Read his other novels! Being There is definitely a critique, or mocking, of Heidegger.

    • @marcpadilla1094
      @marcpadilla1094 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stephencarroll230 Gump also.

  • @alecmisra4964
    @alecmisra4964 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Didnt heidegger become a "das man" at one point?

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm unaware of this, since that is what he tells us to avoid.

    • @simongrolercher6263
      @simongrolercher6263 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@Eternalised No, his remarks about das Man are not to be taken morally-oncticly, in terms of what we "ought to do". Man is an ontological structure of Dasein and not something to be rejected. But other than that I very much enjoyed your video. Thank you! Also I loved the art!

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes when he becomes a nazi!

    • @BioChemistryWizard
      @BioChemistryWizard ปีที่แล้ว

      @@satnamo Being authentic does not mean being extremely individualistic.

  • @lalsenarath
    @lalsenarath 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Many subjects = objective

  • @tristink332
    @tristink332 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    17:43

  • @arunjetli7909
    @arunjetli7909 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It however is non dialectical as Marx was .as Adorno said that Heidegger is lost in a castle of words
    His error is thst he chose Aristotle as his starting point and not Parmenrdes

  • @42_kranthikiran4
    @42_kranthikiran4 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    😮

  • @rosismordet
    @rosismordet ปีที่แล้ว

    Yo lo perdono, profe Heid. :)

  • @mattsuran1270
    @mattsuran1270 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If a wrestler falls in a forest does it count?

  • @Zeropadd
    @Zeropadd 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    😎

  • @deadringer1009
    @deadringer1009 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    darzines?

  • @owlnyc666
    @owlnyc666 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    So many "great" philosphers, pholosphers. Each NASA "touch" of "truth". But none have the " complete" truth. Some "resonate" more with with some ....Dasein than others. Some philosophies "resonate" more with.methane others. Stoicism "resonates" the most with me!🤔😉😎

    • @owlnyc666
      @owlnyc666 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Then there is his....flirtation with the biggest stupidity of his life. 😉😀

  • @stainsbflowin
    @stainsbflowin 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Latin is needed more than english in this explanation.

  • @jaykemm3472
    @jaykemm3472 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Chili Dogs...…… Did !!!

  • @804god
    @804god 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    they

  • @johannbogason1662
    @johannbogason1662 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    utterly self-serving pessimism. great !

  • @livesimplified7970
    @livesimplified7970 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Heideggar how to say very little with a lot of words

    • @alecmisra4964
      @alecmisra4964 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Well said.

    • @satnamo
      @satnamo 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Less words count more because
      More words count less.
      Therefore,
      Simple is beautiful-
      Simple,
      But not too simple.
      Simplicity is das ultimate form of sophistication

  • @channel_---
    @channel_--- 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Too idealistic.and ignores suffering suppression of shadow which seeps into an ever corrupting society Glad it evolved from this.. Yet Its also basically copying buddism just didn't resonate. A hammer isn't something one would handle with muscle memory alone while distracted
    Stating obvious as beings being in time. And dissapointing that I think therefore I am doesn't mean mind over matter.

  • @RobinHerzig
    @RobinHerzig ปีที่แล้ว

    I want to appreciate the philosophy + separate it from the nazi sh!t but my heart won't let me 😕

  • @johnjepsen4243
    @johnjepsen4243 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Like all philosophers, i.e. gossip and hearsay. Verbiage. Lol

  • @ricardohernandez5944
    @ricardohernandez5944 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    B e a n

  • @arunjetli7909
    @arunjetli7909 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Greatest
    Philosophers in European philosophy not the world

  • @anarhistul7257
    @anarhistul7257 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    He is dead ass wrong

    • @Impaled_Onion-thatsmine
      @Impaled_Onion-thatsmine 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Inexplicable metaphysics and it'll be in you but you get paid for it, no we won't reverse it to some guy guy guy guy guy. She can't do that. He practically remodernized the economy.

  • @BobHooker
    @BobHooker ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wondering why anything exists at all is extreme impatience. Soon enough nothing will for everyone.

  • @jam1087
    @jam1087 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What about the philosophers in the 20th century who love communism. Say the same thing when you speak on them

  • @pendejo6466
    @pendejo6466 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Why should Heidegger apologize for his membership with the Nazis? He was a German in Germany in WWII--most people were Nazis either by membership or sentiment. He didn't do anything that would've seen him executed after Nuremberg, or be kidnapped by the Israelis.

    • @stephencarroll230
      @stephencarroll230 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, you are wrong about that! He wasn’t just some German citizen. He was made rector of the university by the nazi party, was a member, tutored students on nazi ideology and removed Jewish professors. He is fortunate that he wasn’t at Nuremberg. He wasn’t allowed to publish for years, and I believe his archives are still not accessible. His thinking gave intellectual legitimacy to the nazis.

    • @pendejo6466
      @pendejo6466 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@stephencarroll230 And with what crime would they charge him at Nuremberg? He didn't commit war crimes, crimes against the peace, nor crimes against humanity.
      He didn't conduct experiments on prisoners, nor did he advocate for the atrocities committed by the Nazis.

    • @stephencarroll230
      @stephencarroll230 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pendejo6466 Read Victor Farius' book on him, published 30 years ago. The evidence is quite clear.

    • @pendejo6466
      @pendejo6466 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@stephencarroll230 Just summarize it if you already know it.

    • @stephencarroll230
      @stephencarroll230 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@pendejo6466 The book received a lot of attention and criticism. What stood out most for me was 1) his national socialist party membership number and 2) the fact that he thinking can be understood to lead to agreement with Nazi racial ideology. This is disturbing if you spent a long time reading and studying Sein und Zeit and his other works. Those early works are crucial to understanding 20 century intellectual history, despite his flaws. Jasper's, whose student I studied Heidegger with, behaved beautifully in that hard time. In any case, in the US, Heidegger is not seriously studied in philosophy departments. Richard Rorty was one of the few exceptions. Personally, I think you need to read H. to understand modern literary criticism, which is deeply indebted to him, for better or worse.

  • @debanjanchowdhury4397
    @debanjanchowdhury4397 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Phenomenology is really an abstract and complicated concept. It's a demanding task to comprehend and grasp the intrinsic meaning of this concept. But it's really a fascinating and enthralling concept through which we can learn how to speculate our milieu.

  • @FrankiePanaia
    @FrankiePanaia ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Heidegger NEVER aplogized for his *alleged* nazism, because he followed his own philosophy - he rejected the popularism of the revisionist hysterical herd and the "they," to obey his own authenticity. He should be applauded for his moral courage in this regard.
    On the other hand his entire obscure philosophy, riddled with artificial neologisms and inane analogies, comes across as a neo-Eastern cult! Much faith is required! To be sure, to paraphrase that semitic titan of arrogance, the gay Wittgenstein, if it cant be expressed in language, then its not worth saying.

    • @GilesMcRiker
      @GilesMcRiker ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There is nothing "alleged"about his Nazism, it is well documented. Heidegger joined the Nazi party, implemented their policies and published statements, both public and privately, that appear to endorse Nazism, and also denigrated Jews in vulgar anti-semitic terms.
      Whether his philosophical statements completely and unequivocally dovetailed with every arcane facet of hackneyed Nazi ideology is an irrelevant question, and not the standard. Nor is it particularly convincing that he once showed kindness by getting a bagel to a Jew.
      We don't doubt Hitler's credentials as a racist simply because he allied himself with the Japanese and other "races".
      When does not flirt with an ideology as reprehensible as Nazism, and one would certainly expect very clear moral and ethical delineation might such and apparently enlightened intellectual.
      It is utterly pathetic that a man who mastered the philosophical Legacy of the West was at best a passive supporter and at worst an enthusiast one of the most cruel destructive and genocidal ideologies in history, without ever providing a convincing accounting of his indefensible positions.
      Far from regarded as some kind of hero or principled conscientious objector, considering his role and status, he is history's sniveling coward and opportunist who acted in a morally vacuous manner at a time when the world couldn't even count on its greatest philosopher to denounce hatred, military conquest and genocide

    • @FrankiePanaia
      @FrankiePanaia ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GilesMcRiker Does your highly emotive sanctimony also extend to the British and their decadent royals, who collectively, wiped from the face of this planet, over a billion souls in the last 2 centuries? When did that anal-retentive Russell ever denounce the countless evils of his mother Empire?
      In comaprison to the British Empire, (a 1000 times more perfidous and odious than their teutonic cousins), the German NAZIs were a litter of cute puppies.

    • @BioChemistryWizard
      @BioChemistryWizard ปีที่แล้ว

      @@GilesMcRiker Dasein exists to negate the nothingness, everything else is bullshit fluff. It makes absolutely no sense for Heidegger to apologize being involved in the authentic life of Being, especially when he was destined to go through it. He simply remarked on the stupidity of assuming Hitler wanted to reinvigorate German culture and rural life instead of expansionism. Heidegger was following his own way of life that he wrote. (The right way).

  • @fraidoonw
    @fraidoonw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    thanks dear Eternalised! yes Heidegger is extremely difficult to understand. this episode helps us to understand some fragments of his philosophy in a rather simpler way. This is better explained than the episode on Nietzsche.

    • @Eternalised
      @Eternalised  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Glad it was helpful! :)

    • @fraidoonw
      @fraidoonw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Eternalised all videos are great! thanks!

    • @adaptercrash
      @adaptercrash 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's the whole point of the book. It's funny that way.

  • @Orion225
    @Orion225 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great explanation. Enjoyed it thoroughly. You got a new subs. 👍

  • @Davlavi
    @Davlavi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This channel deserves way more likes. Keep up the great videos.

  • @davidotten2379
    @davidotten2379 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for finding kairos for Heidegger.