If you found this video useful, please check out my new "Practical EMC for IoT Designers" video course. This comprehensive course contains over 10 hours of video material that cover every aspect of EMC testing for intentional transmitters in accordance with Radio Equipment Directive (RED), ETSI, ITU-R, and EN standards. Apply "RF50" discount code for a 50% off during limited promotion this year only. Don't miss out! www.pcbforemc.com/courses
Great video! Was looking information about spurious emission testing. Could you also share what is the different between the EN301 908-1 and EN301 908-13. Generally I know it's extended version of 301 908-1, but beyond that it's too technical. Does EN301 908-13 also done on UE level?
Thank you for your comment! :) EN 301 908-13 is specific to E-UTRA UE, while EN 301 908-1 applies to any equipment on cellular IMT network. This includes UE as well as BS and all applicable radio access technologies (2G-5G, etc.). As a result, the testing to EN 301 908-13 is more strict as its detailed in a very specific manner per TS 136 508. For example, the lowest channel bandwidths, 5 MHz and the highest must all be tested, while in EN 301 908-1 we simply can pick the worst case. That alone increases the testing time 3x times. There are other differences.
Very cool! I've always wanted to know what goes into proper testing of these IoT devices, I think your channel has the best content for it. Looks like you've done this many times before, could I ask how you got into this specific industry?!
Thank you! I design IoT products and such, so I have to get involved because it's a legal requirement to do qualification testing. But you could also simply work for the test house, and you will learn quite a lot about RF if you did that :)
@@DrEMC-sf8rx Thanks, we've got SAA locally here in Australia and I too am wanting to develop my own IoT products. Guess there's no harm in forwarding my CV to them.
If you found this video useful, please check out my new "Practical EMC for IoT Designers" video course. This comprehensive course contains over 10 hours of video material that cover every aspect of EMC testing for intentional transmitters in accordance with Radio Equipment Directive (RED), ETSI, ITU-R, and EN standards. Apply "RF50" discount code for a 50% off during limited promotion this year only. Don't miss out!
www.pcbforemc.com/courses
Great video! Was looking information about spurious emission testing. Could you also share what is the different between the EN301 908-1 and EN301 908-13. Generally I know it's extended version of 301 908-1, but beyond that it's too technical. Does EN301 908-13 also done on UE level?
Thank you for your comment! :)
EN 301 908-13 is specific to E-UTRA UE, while EN 301 908-1 applies to any equipment on cellular IMT network. This includes UE as well as BS and all applicable radio access technologies (2G-5G, etc.).
As a result, the testing to EN 301 908-13 is more strict as its detailed in a very specific manner per TS 136 508. For example, the lowest channel bandwidths, 5 MHz and the highest must all be tested, while in EN 301 908-1 we simply can pick the worst case. That alone increases the testing time 3x times. There are other differences.
@@DrEMC-sf8rx thanks!! That's good to know that it is more stringent than version 1.
If my 4G repeater already test against EN 301 908-15, do I need to repeat the test for EN 301 908-1?
No, you do not need to repeat the test. You can read more here:
www.etsi.org/technologies/mobile/4G
Very cool! I've always wanted to know what goes into proper testing of these IoT devices, I think your channel has the best content for it.
Looks like you've done this many times before, could I ask how you got into this specific industry?!
Thank you! I design IoT products and such, so I have to get involved because it's a legal requirement to do qualification testing. But you could also simply work for the test house, and you will learn quite a lot about RF if you did that :)
@@DrEMC-sf8rx Thanks, we've got SAA locally here in Australia and I too am wanting to develop my own IoT products. Guess there's no harm in forwarding my CV to them.
@@TradieTrev Great idea! Once you get your hands on equipment you'll learn 10x faster :)