10 Times the BBC Was Corrupt
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ย. 2024
- Is THIS what your TV licence is paying for? For this list, we're looking at 10 Times the BBC was Corrupt, examining all the times the BBC failed to be as neutral as it’s supposed to be. Let us know in the comments whether YOU pay your TV license.
Check out these other brilliantly British videos from WMUK:
10 Times Celebrities Took the Piss Out of BBC - • 10 Times Celebrities T...
10 Times the BBC was Forced to Apologise - • 10 Times the BBC was F...
Subscribe for more Brilliantly British Content:
wmojo.com/watc...
Challenge friends and family on our multiplayer Trivia!
wmojo.com/trivia
Have Your Idea Become A Video!
wmojo.com/suggest
WatchMojoUK is your source for British Top 10s, covering popular shows like Doctor Who, Strictly Come Dancing, Great British Bake Off, Coronation Street, This Morning, Good Morning Britain, The Graham Norton Show, Sherlock, and more! We also cover the latest in British Movies, Music and Pop Culture - We Top 10 it all!
#fail #British #BBC #TV #licence
They don't always get away with it though!
Check out 10 Times the BBC was Forced to Apologise
th-cam.com/video/P_p8MGj-JHY/w-d-xo.html
Just a wee mistake, but in the section in the Scottish referendum you said they showed bias towards the yes campaign as they wanted to remain in the union when it was actually the no campaign that wanted to remain part of the union and the yes campaign was in support of independence
You didn't mention the BBC's (and all major outlets') failure to engage with the Forde Report. It holds BBC Panorama's feet to the fire regarding 'reporting' on Labour antisemitism..
What do you mean it was corrupt I think you mean IT IS corrupt
I don't want or need the BBC, it's a propaganda channel nothing more! It hasn't produced good programming since 1989! F the Beeb, I resent being forced to pay for it and I hate all the shows on it! I don't care for dancing, antiques, house renovations, baking or police dramas! End the Jimmy Savile appreciation society!
Like everything else
One of the ways they corrupt you is having to pay £150 a year for a tv licence.
Because it said "10 times", if they were to say "10 times the bbc are corrupt" they would sound like they failed primary school
fair enough
At university, the BBC came in to do a talk for us. This was during Johnson's popularity rise.
The talk was so clearly interwoven with propaganda that about 15 minutes in, the room emptied out and the guy that came in was forced to stop the talk as there was no longer an audience there to listen...
so they tried to make Boris out to be a good guy?
wow!
@@mattalan6618 No, it wasn't as obvious as that, it was more about the TV licensing agreement.
They we're blaming our generation (Gen-Z) for the fact that the BBC is in a rough spot financially because "Young people don't watch television anymore".
When one student pointed out the cuts enforced by the Tories and as the reason for the BBC having a hard time, they defended the cuts.
It was at that point that they lost the room.
@@dylancarr8415 maybe they dont realize that todays youth has access to other means of watching TV from Prime to Hulu Disnes Plus and Netflix
@@mattalan6618 They do know this but they'd rather blame us for watching shows elsewhere than blame the government for cutting their funds
Would be harder to find 10 times the BBC wasn't corrupt.
It is horribly right wing.
@@beanmcqueen 😂😂😂😂😂😂
The BBC is so left wing
@@stephenweir9871 you're right. Andrew Neil is probably a communist.
@@stephenweir9871 after all that's come out ? The BBC are in bed with thr tory party you mug
@@stephenweir9871 Yeah Right! Kuenssberg, Bruce and co, real Trotskyites. The Tories will shout and shout about any criticism and publish books about left-wing bias at the BBC, but not a word when the BBC actually supports them! Or perhaps it is only bias when its against your side? What about the fact that the majority of newspapers are right wing and three are extremely right wing? The BBC should be impartial, but they also have a duty to tell the truth if the rest of the media are biased.
To anyone who suggests the BBC isn't corrupt, I'd like to say "'ow's about that, then, guys and girls?"
And do you know what it is yet? Or do you want to be in my gang?
Nice one 👍😂😂😂
@@soupdragonuk I was disappointed when I heard about Rolf Harris. He was like everyone's fun uncle. (but, not that kind of fun).
@@FatNorthernBigot Yes, that stunned me too. I used to really enjoy his art shows and Animal Hospital. Then you find out the real him, and the darkness...shiver. It was sickening.
@@soupdragonuk However, it was almost a relief when Jimmy Saville was outed. He looked and acted like a wrong un.
How do you explain to people that they've been lied to and gaslit their whole life? (which influences policy) This is a great start thank you! 🙏🏽
Something tells me that WatchMojoUK need to make a series on this. As an Aussie reading the comments, something tells me that this is simply a tip of the very tip of an iceberg.
The idea of paying for a license to use something I already own to watch a channel i've little interest in is ridiculous.
I thought that we had bad when it comes to corruption (I'm an American).
Lol USA media is far worse. Actually I blame the spread of oligarchy and political obfuscation on the fact its so successful in USA.
What kind of American? Southern, Central, Northern?
Look into how the BBC protected Jimmy Savile for decades or how the BBC panorama news programme made false allegations of antisemitism to Labour party activist Rika Bird (who IS Jewish)
F the BBC!
@@johnbinnie5697 Tooshay! (No accents on my keyboard.)
@@johnbinnie5697- Northern.
I stopped paying for my TV licence 3 years ago. £480 better off so far and never looked back.
I opted out of the TV licence 3 years ago. Because there's nothing on TV worth watching.
IMHO finding ten times the BBC was not biased would perhaps be easier!
To be fair the win for staying in the UK wasn't that narrow ( around 10%)
5%
The referendum question was, "Should Scotland be an independent country?", which voters answered with "Yes" or "No".[2] The "No" side won with 2,001,926 (55.3%) voting against independence and 1,617,989 (44.7%) voting in favour. The turnout of 84.6%
I won’t forgive them for the way they badly treated Christopher Eccleston.
*Jimmy Savile died in 2011, not 2012. The scandal did break in 2012 though.
The biggest problem the BBC has now is most young people today get their media content via mobile devices rather than television.
Whether it's through social media or commercial news channels that 24/7 live stream on TH-cam or streaming services for films like Netflix and Amazon.
This is the new way that people (mostly the younger generation) consume their content, so we're getting to a point where the TV license funding for the BBC is starting to out live its usefulness.
I agree. But anyone who suggests that gets accused of making a political attack. Which it isn't.
The license fee is going up 13% next year. Worth it ?
You mean pounds, not percent, another 3.5p a day
Only ten? I can think of hundreds.
Only one government did more damage than this one. Thatchers!
They also make poor decisions on their channels, including the idea of sacking BBC Four and CBBC, moving Three online only to regret that soon after and now, they are planning to reverse that again but this time, bring One and Two down as well.
Video came up and I thought "Wow only ten" XD
Side note: Our Supreme Court is nothing like the USA's, it's basically Labours version of the House of lords.
I have a feeling this may have been influenced by recent going ons with a big eared crisp seller and his suspension. First time in his career he was sent off as well. The BBC isn't impartial and hasn't been since 2017
Just 10 times??
Yes its out there now and people are switching off i haven't believed a word the BBC news utters for years😊
Just ten ? The Jimmy saville lovers will cover up anything to make money....
i dont watch live TV so i dont have to pay, however i would watch other channels if i didnt have to pay the BBC tax.
With reguard to the bbc being corrupt i thank you for keeping the list short.
I can't believe that Naga Munchetty was even complained about. She was answering a question from Dan Walker about her experience of racism. Im not a fan of Naga but she was right and people didn't like it.
I've been saying this since 2001 - journalists are clueless. If they knew anything about numbers, they would not be journalists: they'd be rich economists.
Ahhhhhh inflation ‘only’ at 5%. What a time to be alive!!!!
This is so weird and so unAmerican that a channel dedicated to entertainment like celebrities, tv shows and movies has made a video about the BBC and the British news, politics, economy and social issues. Apparently, news and current affairs are now entertainment?!
They certainly do undestand how we live and don't give a shit...!!!
I’m amazed their still around, with all the corruptions
don't pay tv license
A tip for you watchmojo... if you want to get a message across clearly, DONT smother it in near-incessant annoying background music
What about not covering the March in London Protests on Friday????
The BAE BAE CAE
Only ten?!? 😂
To quote Grogu... "yuup."
With reference to the Independence Campaign the No Campaign was the pro-Unionist campaign, the Yes campaign supported an Independent Scotland
But brownie points for raising the beeb's fury about academic freedom
Its always it is including the weather
What happened to Gary linekers 1930s Germany tweet
Tory Laura is a classic example.
Now do the same with other broadcasters.
BBC Asian Network and Cliff Richard?
This is pretty ridiculous. I don't think any of those has been proven (though I accept some look very dodgy indeed), and some of them, even if true, wouldn't be classed as 'corrupt'.
ONLY 10???????
I'm not sure the BBC has ever "parroted" the Govt.
What about the Gary Lineker fiasco ???
What about it ffs
@@iandawe948 why didn't they include it in their piece?
Only 10😆
TV licence to pay for their cover ups
Only the BBC??? Oh please!!! Sounds like someone has a personal vendetta against the BBC. Smdh
You forgot EVERY episode of Panorama ever!
Which way are you meaning that? Panorama has done a lot of good in exposing carer abuse, etc. BTW how many episodes of Panorama have you watched? It began in 1953, so unless you are a lot older than I am, I can't imagine you've watched all of them.
@@charleshayes2528 perhaps he's angry because he can't buy a spaghetti tree and felt lied to
@@charleshayes2528 the tommy robinson debacle was the end of john sweeney (not a fan of tommy by the way) i watched it growing up in the 70,s and 80,s but that definetley made you think what else have they manipulated down the years?
Biased yes but that's not corrupt
I don’t think that the 2014 referendum was won by a small margin. 10% in favour of the union is not a small large margin it’s a large one.
Didn't expect watchmojo to make a video about BBC partiality
Disjointed monologue, lacked focus.
“Biased Science” giving equal airtime to climate change deniers, even though science says they are wrong.
Then the narrator reads a stat about what % of the British public is concerned about climate change.
You don’t consider that the “science” do you?
What was the point of even mentioning it?
I pay TV licence,
I complain about the BBC
The BBC ignore me and do not represent me.
This list is dumb. How is not understanding economics corrupt? No mention of Brexit bias? Or certain unnamed reporters holding jobs 30 years regardless of viewing figures and aspiring young reporters applying for that role.
Of course it's a Tory objective to stop people paying the licence fee which you peddle at the start of your piece. Demise of the BBC helps other media outlets.
Another option is to remove political appointments from top jobs in the BBC.
Should do one on how BBC jail people in tv tax . Have no need for there crap
Their*
Thanks for that
Eh... they YES campaign in Scotland was for independence. No or better together was for staying in the union. Get your facts right. Bang goes your research credibility.
BBC-British Biased Commentary
Boy it's like the oppression Olympics
This is click bate it should say “is ” in the title
I'm surprised its only 10 times they were found out to be bent.
They weren't found to be bent in this video. It's really poor.
Licence change will not happen until 2025.
So what I'm getting is BBC is just like Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, and every other news organization in America. 🤷🤷🤷🤷
Only ten ?
Don’t pay the bbc tax!
I dont watch tv theres nothing worth watching i dont pay my licence because i dont watch tv so if they say ,,oh you need a license to stream 😂😂 nope you dont and if they come round your house them goons.say eff off and slam the door.WAKE UP PEOPLE.
Private education does not make you 'upper class'.
A very small proportion of the UK population could afford private education and EVERY upper class person IS privately educated
Shooting the messenger, not factual, just complaining the truth does not fit personal believes.
Cancelled my BBC app...one of the most respected news organisations...just a joke...sad day.
How do you cancel an app?
@@my__socrates__note delete, to the bin
Only ten times? You didn't look very hard.
I love the BBCs programmes they do produce quality viewing some of the best in the world. It is how it comes across always a bit snobby and condescending.
LOL
All the clips shown are SKY news
only 10 times..... its always been corrupt
The "no" campaign was unionist, the "yes" campaign was nationalist, get your basic facts right please.
When did trump say racist things ? Still waiting on an answer for that can't seem to get one
Only 10?
Just 10?
BBC is the EU version of CNN!!!
Only 10, mmmmmmmmmmm.
Don't pay for the BBC's licence going up by £13 more get rich quick don't pay for this BBC's licence if everyone stops paying it will dissolve who needs this channels
So what's the alternative? - not all of us get LBC. If you think the BBC are worse than the newspapers or Fox, you should think again.
@@charleshayes2528 What has LBC got to do with it? The alternative is watching catch up services instead of live tv, get a firestick and get a subscription service like amazon prime or netflix and you aren't missing out on much.
This is a biased video. You almost duped me.
The climate change denial to Thatcher segway is totally hypocritical. As one said at first, all things shouldn't be given equal weight against each other. So, if the BBC is against Thatcher that is taking a side. First, taking a side is good. Second, taking a side is bad.
'Taking a side' against science is called _pseudoscience._ In case you hadn't noticed, that's *_bad._*
@@beachcomber2008 Yes, but I think MyPlace1989 was not denying that - just pointing out that the film seems to decide when taking a side is OK and when it's not. Prejudice against Thatcher would've been wrong, but "taking a side" by giving people the facts, pointing out how "safe" the NHS really was, what was happening to unemployment or poverty is not prejudice, it is reporting.
@@beachcomber2008 Agreed. And not taking a side against a political thought has lead to Nazism, slavery, and genocide.
@@MyPlace-eb7fb OK. We will agree to despise sin. One's passivity to sin in others is itself a sin, etc. I was more concerned with the manner of your expression, I think, which seemed confused. :)
@@beachcomber2008 No idea what you are talking about, to be honest. I find your comment confusing too.
I pay my licence fee because a privatised BBC would just be another advertising driven and right wing publisher. Your coverage is good, but lacks context. Maggie Thatcher was not as popular as you make out, since the Tories had gerrymandered the boundaries and even removed, renamed or destroyed historic counties. First past the post meant she got in (the first time) without a majority of the vote. Also, you don't talk about any of the content of the Panorama programmes. You criticise the BBC for a false impartiality over science, but assume that a flagship current affairs programme is not supposed to hold the Government of the day to account. Finally, you don't seem to remember the Miners' Strike - where Thatcher used the (supposedly non-partisan) Police as a paramilitary force for strike-breaking. Footage of a Mounted Police charge against Miners was "accidentally" edited to make it look as if Miners provoked the charge rather than their acts being an attempt to prevent their members from being run down. It is another example of BBC "corruption", but it was not anti-Thatcher.
I am appalled at the way the BBC "impartiality" meant that spurious political arguments were given air time over Brexit and at the way the BBC has given in to Tory pressure or speaks with an obvious Tory voice, e.g.; Laura Kuenssberg's reaction to the statement that Boris Johnson lied. Nevertheless, the BBC is much better than the alternative. During my lifetime, ITV has given up almost all pretence of being about public broadcasting - they lobbied for a relaxation of the rules - the Tories gave it to them and they are struggling and want the BBC to be defunded. If we lose a national public service broadcaster we won't get it back. Perhaps you should show some of the things the BBC has done for the national good? "Cathy Come Home" is a good starting point, as are Panorama programmes on Care Homes, etc.
On the other side, instead of helping the Tories trash a potential critic, why not look at the corruption of the mainstream media? The News of the World? The Sun and Hillsborough? The all out bias of the Telegraph and Mail - the Mail was aggressive in its anti-Semitic rhetoric in the 1930s, even wanting to deny entry to those fleeing the Holocaust and they are bringing that sort of language up again. Or are you only interested in having a go at the BBC? That's all I can see for your channel.
Although I agree with 90% of what you've said, I still don't feel that we need a national public service broadcaster who is incredibly biased and does not provide impartial public service broadcasting that it claims to do. The BBC have predominantly leaned right-wing for years so what difference would it make if they were commercially privatized?
The fact is the current and newer generations do not use the BBC and feel it is outdated and biased. The newer generations favour subscription services like Netflix and Amazon Prime or simply watch TH-cam. The only reason the BBC do not want to be privately owned is because they know they're financially better off being publicly funded. They could still sell advertising but also have a public service remit, like Channel 4 currently do.
I do however share your admiration for the Panorama programming but after the Bashir scandal I was left sickened that a national broadcaster would steep so low. However not surprising as they have been a disgrace of a corporation for many years now.
Your views on biased science shows how utterly biased you are
The Yes campaign was the opposite side. Do any researchers work on these videos before you put them out?
I don't think letting people disagreeing with climate change talk is corrupt, people just don't like the "accept this one and only version of events else you are a bad person" but its one of many complicated things.
I don't think that is quite right. When it comes to scientific processes, it is not a matter of opinion - unless you can show evidence that "climate change" isn't happening or is caused by something other than human action. Just denying or disagreeing with climate change talk isn't enough to give you air time, you have to put forward a robust case. In this instance, the vast majority of scientists agree that the evidence supports their view. That is not too complicated. Knowing the best way of dealing with it is where it gets more difficult.
@@charleshayes2528 Thats another way of saying it, when I see climate change reports it seems mostly worse case scenario and if people don't agree they get shamed, the way I am for everything is step back and don't go worse case.
Defund the BBC. Use the salaries and program funds to actually help British citizens in need.
If we get rid of the licence fee where will those funds come from? I bet people are going to be even more unhappy paying the same fee to help other people - even if that is a good idea.
I don't get it I think that the BBC is quite woke and left leaning but this video is making out they are really right wing? I don't get it.
it is not at all woke
Some of the entertainment is left ish but the important things that actually influence people such as the news is definitely right wing and has been for years.
@@nathangardner6423 Tell me a Right Wing position the BBC holds
@@DaDoM123 Before he does, try most of the news reporting for the last 2 decades. Before new 'labour' held an inquisition when they were called out for sexing up the report the led to the 2003 Iraq war. Laura, Nick and the recently employed Andrew Neil being the most obvious no aplogy tory supporters. Or until recently dragging in Nigel Lawson to give his climate change is rubbish spiel. Your comment says more about your position than the bbc's
@@DaDoM123 Sure, you have Laura Kuenssberg directly parroting from the conservatives for years without any criticism, you have the recent David Attenborough documentary that has been relegated to iPlayer because of the backlash of right wing anti science climate change deniers, you have Andrew Neil who used to be their most prominent presenter while he was chairman of the Spectator a right wing rag that routinely engages in misinformation. And of course let's not forget the Incredible bias against Jeremy Corbyn by running that Panorama documentary which has since come out that they deliberately ignored and obfuscated the truth to push a right wing narrative in support of the Tories.
And this is democracy
!
close the BBC down
Only 10 times? You need better researchers
You're gonna need a longer list WatchMojo. Not even a top 1000 can cover it.
Was hard to narrow it down, that's for sure
Jesus! Are they really that corrupt?
@@kyliethelittlespider-mangirl94 yes. Yes they are.
This could probably be an annual video from you guys
"Annual" don't you mean weekly lol
@@martinlatham4322 Would "monthly" suffice? I feel that in recent times the BBC have been in the news for negative reasons more often than not.
@@thefightinggameplayer I mean, they are pretty bad. I'd say it could be a daily one. ☺️😂
The 'Yes' Campaign was the PRO independence one in the 2014 Scottish independence referendum. You have it the wrong way round. The BBC was biased in favour of the 'No' campaign.
I feel like its "upper classes" segment that is actually the biggest problem and allowing these things to happen, or the ones that are trying to to get away with it.
A better list would be "10 Times the BBC WASN'T corrupt" although you may struggle to find 10
Even 1?