😮 It's So Simple - 3D Print Blobs And Zits - 3D Print Troubleshooting

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 31 พ.ค. 2024
  • 😮 It's So Simple - 3D Print Blobs And Zits - 3D Print Troubleshooting
    🔴 Subscribe to my channel: / @3dparts4u
    🎁 My Patreon page: / 3dparts4u
    🎧 My Spotify playlists: open.spotify.com/user/schippe...
    Changing one setting removed all blobs and zits in the corners for me!
    🔽 Digital Model: www.printables.com/model/2630...
    📄 License: creativecommons.org/licenses/...
    🔽 Digital Model: cults3d.com/en/3d-model/home/...
    ⏱ Chapters:
    0:00 What's in this video?
    0:07 How i fixed the blobs and zits
    1:50 Channel promo ( / @allvisuals4u )
    1:55 Website promo (www.3dpartsforyou.com)
    2:00 More videos (www.youtube.com/@3dparts4u/pl...)
    👍 Thanks for watching the video It's So Simple - 3D Print Blobs And Zits - 3D Print Troubleshooting
    🌐 Visit my website: www.3dpartsforyou.com
    🔩 Subscribe to my other channel AllVisuals4U | Design & Engineering: / @allvisuals4u
    🔩 All playlists of AllVisuals4U | Design & Engineering: www.youtube.com/@AllVisuals4U...
    📦 Subscribe to my channel 3DParts4U | 3D Printing For Everyone: / @3dparts4u
    📦 All playlists of 3DParts4U | 3D Printing For Everyone: www.youtube.com/@3dparts4u/pl...
    ⚡ Subscribe to my short format channel: / @allvisuals4ushorts
    ⚡ All playlists of the short format channel: www.youtube.com/@AllVisuals4U...
    #3DParts4U #AllVisuals4U #3DPrinted #3DPrinting #3DPrints #3DPrint #3DPrinter #3DPrintedModels #3DModel #PLA #3DDesign #Maker #Making #Modeling #Filament #Tutorial #Tutorials #HowTo #Wiki #Manual #Help #Tips #Tricks #Simple #Blobs #Zits #Troubleshooting #Retraction #Test
    🔈 Moving On - Wayne Jones (TH-cam Audio Library)

ความคิดเห็น • 39

  • @3DParts4U
    @3DParts4U  19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    👉 Visit My Design & Engineering Channel! www.youtube.com/@AllVisuals4U
    🤝 Get Commercial Access To My Catalog Of 3D Files! www.patreon.com/3DParts4U

  • @user-fk6vj9by9u
    @user-fk6vj9by9u หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you…and your choice is music is excellent!

    • @3DParts4U
      @3DParts4U  หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're very welcome!

  • @Cereal_Killr
    @Cereal_Killr 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I have a ender 3 with the sprite...I use 0.4 retract at 30mm/s and zero on prime. I never have any issues...using cura. Works very well for me.

    • @3DParts4U
      @3DParts4U  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great!

  • @kaasmeester5903
    @kaasmeester5903 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks for the tip, I'll give that setting a go. Default seems to be 0 (in PrusaSlicer) and most of my prints are coming out fine, but I have noticed that with certain filaments and objects, crap tends to accumulate on the nozzle or the work piece. It only happens around places with many retractions ("tree" supports, or embossed lettering on an object) so maybe it's the deretraction causing this.

    • @3DParts4U
      @3DParts4U  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You're welcome! I think you're right.

  • @kgeryp13
    @kgeryp13 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you! It's so obvious, but I never checked, also WIPE move is important! :)

    • @3DParts4U
      @3DParts4U  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you too!

  • @megadisc1982
    @megadisc1982 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nice

    • @3DParts4U
      @3DParts4U  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks!

  • @Tech______
    @Tech______ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Im using a longer lk5 pro upgraded and i get the blobs a lot it does tend to apear more commonly on smaller prints and this is my first rodeo with a 3D printer also i use cura and i cant find the extra reastart setting

    • @3DParts4U
      @3DParts4U  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe you could try to enter a negative number for 'Retraction Extra prime amount'? I never use Cura, but Simplify3D.

    • @Tom-ik5sc
      @Tom-ik5sc 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Like he mentioned in his reply, it's called "Retraction extra prime amount" in cura. Different name, same exact thing. Unfortunately different slicers use different terms. I usually set it at 0.2 or 0.3 on my SV01. The weird thing is, sometimes larger numbers help, sometimes smaller. But usually less than 0.5 is the ticket for me to fix this issue. You may also want to look into setting up "linear advance".

  • @TuncayAyhan
    @TuncayAyhan 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Isn’t that the seam?

    • @crypton1782
      @crypton1782 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It is

    • @3DParts4U
      @3DParts4U  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      The blobs were on all the 4 corners, so it also occurred outside the position of the seam.

    • @crypton1782
      @crypton1782 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      But the setting you adjustet does only affect the seams or parts where there has been a retraction beforehand in general.. and if u don't use retraction on z hop or something similar then it can only be the seams. Do you use seam at sharpest corner setting? Cuz then it could have seams in all corners. If u use seam at a specific place e.g. the back or something then it would indeed indicate blobs outside of the seams

    • @crypton1782
      @crypton1782 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      But reducing blobs at the seams is also a noble quest in achieving higher quality looking prints so nothing wrong with that IMO

    • @Pmc987
      @Pmc987 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, that’s why I use aligned or paint the seam, at least that way it looks like a manufactured seam than just a mess

  • @antonkukoba3378
    @antonkukoba3378 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    And what do I do if my slicer allows only positive values of Extra restart length?

    • @3DParts4U
      @3DParts4U  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Then I don't think this option is so valuable in my opinion. There will be too much filament after each retraction when the value is positive.

  • @baljazz
    @baljazz 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What slicer are you using?

    • @3DParts4U
      @3DParts4U  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi, I use Simplify3D!

  • @troymcdonald
    @troymcdonald 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What slicer is this? Thanks

    • @3DParts4U
      @3DParts4U  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I use Simplify3D for my prints.

  • @mr.szkielkokoko9322
    @mr.szkielkokoko9322 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    1:17 LUL 0,02 to 0,20 or 0,20 to 0,02 This is the question

    • @3DParts4U
      @3DParts4U  2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      0,02 to 0,20 gave the better result. This was indeed not right in the video, which shows the opposite.

  • @daliasprints9798
    @daliasprints9798 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Extra restart distance is always wrong. It should be set to 0 and the option should not even be there in the slicer.

    • @3DParts4U
      @3DParts4U  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can you explain why?

    • @daliasprints9798
      @daliasprints9798 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@3DParts4U Because it produces more overall extrusion (more volume/mass of plastic) than what's intended to be there, and the amount by which it's excess scales with the number of retractions. If you just have big parts with few retractions, it likely just all ends up hidden in infill void. But as soon as you start getting small layer components with little or no infill space, that excess will accumulate and build outward or upward. I've helped folks trying to print articulated dragons and stuff experiencing repeated nozzle collisions and joints fusing, only to find out eventually they were using this "extra restart"...

    • @3DParts4U
      @3DParts4U  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      What's good to know is that my extra distance is a negative number in this video. So less plastic is pushed out of the extruder than what was retracted. A positive number will probably not useful indeed. More plastic will be pushed out each retraction then.

    • @daliasprints9798
      @daliasprints9798 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@3DParts4U Well negative will do the opposite: accumulating under extrusion. Depending on geometry, it will prebends small parts from getting extruded at all, and then the nozzle won't be primed for the next part either.

    • @crypton1782
      @crypton1782 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@daliasprints9798 But I think atleast in his example there is no sign of under extrusion at all. Lines are stacked nicely after the (now smaller) zits.. indicating there is enough extrusion still. Mathematically there should be underextrusion but maybe it is now 'pulled' on a larger length of extrusion and it's not visible or something along the lines..