It has been so long since I have taken, or even used, most of the math in your videos, but I watch them every time you post one. Thank you for giving me exercises to keep my brain in shape!
I cannot thank you enough. For the past two weeks, this topic had been a nightmare to me. Encountering you has put me in the driving seat now. Thank you so much.
Dayummm.... He's so smooth, nice looking and cheerful..... His cheerful spirit got me glued watching on 1x speed..... I usually watch tutorials on a faster speed and never comment buh i just had to..... He's a great teacher 😁
I really love your energy. You make it so fun to learn math and that is not something i have seen much on youtube. And your pace and small pauses really help to process what you're teaching! Great work. You earned a subscriber! I also think the blackboard makes it more interesting. Idk why but i get bored when i have to look at a greenboard or a whiteboard for a long time. The blackboard, the lighting, your outfit and you just blend well together and the whole picture is just visually appealing to look at for long period of time. Im sure there's some psychological explanation to that.
The precision you have shown just makes everything simple and amazing. I had problems finding eigen values now its solved . So much appreciation for the wonderful work done🤝🤝
He took ( 2 - lambda) which is common from eqn outside then eqn will become { ( lam square - 4 lam +2)+(1)}. After removing parenthesis you will get 2+1=3
So I have a question, is it possible to first put the matrix in REF then later subtract lambda from the major diagonal and do the determinant directly?
i need some help, for lamda=2 i got [1 2 0] all of x are in term of x1, my ans isnt same as sir, if lamda=2 , in term of x2 i will get[ 2 1 0] which will be same as sir. does that mean for every diff Vector i can choose diff x to be in term of? or for example i choose x1,x2,x3 to be in term of x1 for lamda=1, lamda=2and lamda=3, all x have to in term of x1, sir did mention at the end of the video but just wanna double confirm which is the right one or i calculate wrongly, not sure
He took ( 2 - lambda) which is common from eqn outside then eqn will become { ( lam square - 4 lam +2)+(1)}. After removing parenthesis you will get 2+1=3
Does it matter which order we put the eigenvalues? For example if we did λ1 = 3, λ2 =2 , λ3 =1? I know how to answer this but my lecturer always has a different order of eigen values, which also changes the order of the eigen vectors
Did you figure out if the order matters or not, I'm also stuck on the same issue. Cause if we change the order of eigenvalues, i think we get different eigenvectors as well
finally a person that explains how to find the x for different λ and doesnt skip the whole process like it's already explained
ooh my God finally !!!🤗🤗
It has been so long since I have taken, or even used, most of the math in your videos, but I watch them every time you post one. Thank you for giving me exercises to keep my brain in shape!
Ul
I got this in 12 mins, i couldn’t hear my lecture a full hour lesson. You earned a subscriber🎉
The way his face got serious at the end when he said "those who stop learning stop living" felt like a threat.
I am from Algeria and I liked the wonderful way you gave the lesson. Thank you. 🇩🇿
There's something about the way you summarized yet explained EVERYTHING clearly!!
Thanks man
I call this transcendental instruction: lucid, precise, engaging and completely relaxed. Thank you!
where have you been all my life ?
That’s what I’m saying
🤩🤩
He's actually good. Alhamdulillah.
Agree
this has to be the most helpful video for this subject, thank you so much
you don't have any idea of how much grateful I am. i never understood it in the class but now i get it perfectly
THANK YOU VERY MUCH
You have got way too much style to be this good of a math teacher
I cannot thank you enough. For the past two weeks, this topic had been a nightmare to me. Encountering you has put me in the driving seat now. Thank you so much.
i love how you talk so calmly and slowly ;-; cheers sir
Yes finally I was able to understand this
I learned LA in IIT sill couldn't find simple eigen vectors man
Dayummm.... He's so smooth, nice looking and cheerful.....
His cheerful spirit got me glued watching on 1x speed.....
I usually watch tutorials on a faster speed and never comment buh i just had to.....
He's a great teacher 😁
Thank you.
same here fr
You earned a sub bro. I like it when there is no messing around, just clear and simple calculations. Good work
Just discovered this channel and it's a hidden gem 💎
by far the most easy to understand explanation of this subject.. thank you.
bros handwriting is too good
big fan
I really love your energy. You make it so fun to learn math and that is not something i have seen much on youtube. And your pace and small pauses really help to process what you're teaching! Great work. You earned a subscriber!
I also think the blackboard makes it more interesting. Idk why but i get bored when i have to look at a greenboard or a whiteboard for a long time. The blackboard, the lighting, your outfit and you just blend well together and the whole picture is just visually appealing to look at for long period of time. Im sure there's some psychological explanation to that.
The precision you have shown just makes everything simple and amazing. I had problems finding eigen values now its solved . So much appreciation for the wonderful work done🤝🤝
Thank you! I appreciate you watching.
Thank you sir i saw your lecture first time and i am impressed and excited to see more video
Love your explanation and calmness.❤
You explained something in 10 mins what took my prof 2day classes to explain
Professional and amicable.Thanks for the content.
Thank you, man :D This is such a concise and simple explanation of something I've been struggling with so much.
My God! Your smile at the intro always makes my day, plz keep smiling and lots of prayers for u for making our study journey easier😊
Excellent explanation sir, you have a God given talent for teaching. May you prosper and conti ue to support more people with your teaching.
Amen
You earned a new subscriber ❤, you are doing amazing work man!
Thank you.
I’m from Cambodia 🇰🇭 Thanks u so much for ur clearly explained
Prime Newtons makes this topic clear as a bell! 😊
Thank u sm this helped me alot
I was having a very hard time understanding this concept
Your video was perfect
You are so calm and well explanatory❤❤
Keep the good work sir🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Yo bro , i love how u simply explaining
i respect u
literally best video covering this topic
thanks
I have been struggling with this topic forever but thank God I met you. + one more subscribe
Man, you just earned a new subscriber!
Why didn’t I know you earlier 😢. I love this channel!!
Excellent and understandable presentation.
Great style Sir .. God bless you 😊
Thank you very much sir I really appreciate your hard work you put into to make it becomes easy and understandable.🙏🙏🙏
Love this man.
I highly request that you make a video how to find the determinants ...especially when comes to the expanding and factorization
Really amazing lecture ❤
Your smile and calming voice make every thing easy before watching it
Keep smiling 😁😁
😂i love how bro Looks so cheerful.
Thank you for the explaination🙏
YES! I finally found the perfect video that really does explain how to find the eigenvector with all the right steps. Keep up the work man!
evaluate the integral of I = ∫[1,0] (x + y) dx from point A(0,1) to point B(0,-1) along the semicircle y = √(1-x²),
thank you sir, loved your energy and the way you explained.
I do like the way that you explain the things.
Thankyou sir ,great explanation cleared all my doubt.
May God bless you I owe you my grade 😭😭
at 4:50, is the answer for the lambda2 not meant to be -2 since its (2-Y)?
No, I will use x for lambda in this case. 2-x is the same as (-x+2) = 0 thus getting you 2.
I'm ngl You're a good mathematics teacher than my university professor ❤
I like you teacher, you make it easy
finally, perfect teacher
Thank you, lot of confusion Clarified
Hello! Excellent job I just wanted to know if I have a matrix 3*3 what happens to the eigenvalues if the det(A) equals to 0
This is just too elaborate thankyou so much
You're the best of the best doctors
you teach gracefully
God bless you and your family.❤
Hello Sir...
How do you factorize???😢
3:35 here I think you calculated wrong, because -lambda with 4 will be -4 lambda, so minus with minus is positive
I finally understand this work ,thnx dia a love this ❤
I really appreciate your explanation and your videos 🖤🌠
Excellent
I must say
Can u handle RSU topics
there is a lie at time 4:05 to 4:11, how have you factored out x2-4x+2 ? you mention about removing parenthesis to get a 1 , HOW?
he factored ohe factored out (2-Lambda) for example 2/2 = 1 , (2-lambda)/(2-lambda) = 1
He took ( 2 - lambda) which is common from eqn outside then eqn will become { ( lam square - 4 lam +2)+(1)}. After removing parenthesis you will get 2+1=3
could u also use the rref to find the eigenvectors
Yes
One thing i don't get is that part of finding the det., why is -1(4-λ ) not -4 + λ but -4 - λ
he kinda skipped a step but essentially it was gonna be (-2) - (-1 * (4 - lambda)) = (-2) - (-4 + lambda) = (-2) + 4 - lambda
Love the Explanation !! very clear
"Never stop learning" ~ Prime Newtons
Ahhhh everything in black is beautiful 🖤
Why do you not use calculater to find eigenvalues
i appreciate the way of explaining , thanks 🙏
So I have a question, is it possible to first put the matrix in REF then later subtract lambda from the major diagonal and do the determinant directly?
i need some help, for lamda=2 i got [1 2 0] all of x are in term of x1, my ans isnt same as sir, if lamda=2 , in term of x2 i will get[ 2 1 0] which will be same as sir. does that mean for every diff Vector i can choose diff x to be in term of? or for example i choose x1,x2,x3 to be in term of x1 for lamda=1, lamda=2and lamda=3, all x have to in term of x1, sir did mention at the end of the video but just wanna double confirm which is the right one
or i calculate wrongly, not sure
Same for my lambda = 2 the vector i got was [1 2 0]
It's well explained. Thanks
Something is wrong in your factoring, me thinks, please check 3:52 to 4:11+
Could it be lambda^2 - 5lambda + 4 ? OR am I wrong?
Thank you..... Something is wrong there👌
he factored out (2-Lambda) for example 2/2 = 1 , (2-lambda)/(2-lambda) = 1
@@Orlukemzy he factored out (2-Lambda) for example 2/2 = 1 , (2-lambda)/(2-lambda) = 1
He took ( 2 - lambda) which is common from eqn outside then eqn will become { ( lam square - 4 lam +2)+(1)}. After removing parenthesis you will get 2+1=3
Do you have to do the same thing for all three values of lander or just pick anyone
why was the result of the eigen values 1, 2, 3 and not 2, 1, 3 ?
For lambda=2==> e2=(2;1;0) whene x1=1
Lamda=3 ==> e3=(1;2;1) whene also x1=1
In some sources, we need to convert it to echelon form after lambda placement. What is the difference?
what shall we do when we plug in one of the eigen values then one of the column of the chxcs polynomial becomes zero?
thank you for your help.
Can you please do Singular value decomposition
I've been kind of confuse why didn't you perform elementary row operation?
Not the best video to post on but would you consider doing a lecture series on differential equations more to the tune of how a class would look?
I am planning long classroom-videos but not now. I need to get some things out of the way first. I promise, many series are in the making.
@@PrimeNewtons I look forward to it!
Please where are the exercises he said he will send?
What is the answer for eingenvalue 2 and3?
Founded it thanks
Exact same question i saw in my past questions 😮
4:20 to 4:40 something is wrong 👍🏻 in the place of 2 sir writing 3 🙂
he factored out (2-Lambda) for example 2/2 = 1 , (2-lambda)/(2-lambda) = 1
If |P|=1 and D=diagonal matrix and A=(invP)DP then we can construct as many square matrix as we want whose eigen values all integers
How can join the lectures online
Absolutely amazing
Maybe case when we dont have full set of eigenvectors
The math teacher with no scary face
I love you man. I owe you my degree
bros explaining math like its not the worst fucking torture ever invented
Does it matter which order we put the eigenvalues? For example if we did λ1 = 3, λ2 =2 , λ3 =1? I know how to answer this but my lecturer always has a different order of eigen values, which also changes the order of the eigen vectors
Did you figure out if the order matters or not, I'm also stuck on the same issue. Cause if we change the order of eigenvalues, i think we get different eigenvectors as well
@@sarasaleem7420 yes the order matters when you are checking for diagonalization
proly the best one on the point
Big thank You Sir
💪😁