🔷15 - Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors of a 3x3 Matrix

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
  • 🔷14 - Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors of a 3x3 Matrix
    Given that A is a square matrix (nxn),
    Ax = kx -------(1), where
    A = an nxn matrix (square matrix),
    x = eigenvector of A corresponding to k,
    k = eigenvalue of A corresponding to x
    It is usually asked to find the eigenvalue as well as the eigenvector that satisfy the above equation.
    Notice that we are only interested in the solution with x not equal to zero.
    from (1), Ax = kx
    Ax = kIx ------(2) ,
    (A-kI)x = 0 ----(3)
    the system will give a non-zero solution if and only if det (A-kI)x = 0 ,
    det (A-kI) gives rise to a polynomial called the characteristic polynomial and the equation formed when det (A-kI) = 0 is called the characteristic equation. The solutions to the equation are the eigenvalues....
    Visit channel Playlist for more videos on Engineering mathematics, applied electricity and Basic Mechanics.
    Kindly support and Subscribe
    Thank you

ความคิดเห็น • 421

  • @evansokosodo2791
    @evansokosodo2791 ปีที่แล้ว +62

    This is so straightforward. What a good teacher! Many thanks.

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Awww thanks so much

    • @azizb.tapeing9249
      @azizb.tapeing9249 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So amazing teacher explained clearly. Can I request a lecture on complex root and equal root

  • @bitmesrassdsddddsa
    @bitmesrassdsddddsa ปีที่แล้ว +70

    Thanks for existing man

  • @Sylviadaniel
    @Sylviadaniel 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    This is the best channel ever
    God bless you ❤

  • @mr2seis388
    @mr2seis388 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Hey buddy, I want to thank you for taking on a matrix without 0's because most of these youtube videos i've come across have 0's at the top or bottom and its annoying because the problem i'm tryin to solve is anything but 0's! Thanks!

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You are most welcome, keep watching for more great content. I really appreciate your comments.
      Where do you watch me from?

  • @bobrobert8684
    @bobrobert8684 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Excellent tutorials. Thank you.

  • @Dee_alh
    @Dee_alh ปีที่แล้ว +7

    you are explaining from the bottom of your heart thank you

  • @Salamanca-joro
    @Salamanca-joro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Absolute cinema! i have final exam on Tuesday and you just saved me

  • @kwabenablessed4888
    @kwabenablessed4888 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Very clear explanations. This was very helpful. Thank you

  • @tomasito_2021
    @tomasito_2021 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Your videos on linear algebra have so far been very helpful. I'd love videos on Diagonalisation of matrices, coordinate transformations and Jordan block decompositions. Thanks!

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks so much.
      Kindly check this playlist
      th-cam.com/play/PLInywrvFyvq7oAlPscVnXsd8CRTsh0b77.html

  • @D17D
    @D17D 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for this. You are explaining directly from your heart, with care and love

  • @petrkasanda4511
    @petrkasanda4511 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thanks very much for this teaching
    Much love ❤ and respect from zambia 🇿🇲🇿🇲🇿🇲

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks so much, Kasanda, I appreciate it.
      Kindly text me on +233243084034 whatsapp

  • @SonnyTechAcademy
    @SonnyTechAcademy ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Thanks man. Well explained....the video is long but it's worth it :)

  • @raghavyadav6121
    @raghavyadav6121 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    your videos are really helpful for calculus and linear algebra, thank you!!

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You're most welcome. And thanks for your kind words too.

  • @palmershot2779
    @palmershot2779 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've got a test today and this is all. I needed

  • @MulindwaAbdallahconc-sh4ct
    @MulindwaAbdallahconc-sh4ct ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What a good teacher so precise

  • @DhruvPatel-b9h
    @DhruvPatel-b9h 18 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Best teacher ever you are GOAT.

  • @humzaqureshi1391
    @humzaqureshi1391 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    FOR THOSE STUCK ON 11:05:
    Apply synthetic division to the lambda equation that is given. Divide the polynomial by (x-1). After doing that, you should get the values (zeros) 1, 2, 21. The reason 1 is included is because the synthetic division ending in 0 allows that factor to be included in your solution as an eigonvalue.

    • @DevStuf
      @DevStuf 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      how do you know what to divide by?

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @DevourOrGetDevoured please kindly state the time in the video so I help you out.

    • @DevStuf
      @DevStuf 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn found out why alr

    • @gbgfgfc
      @gbgfgfc หลายเดือนก่อน

      YEP

  • @wangster331
    @wangster331 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Masterpiece. Writing my exam this morning. It sure would save me 😊

  • @ace09wrld
    @ace09wrld 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    there's a shortcut to the eigen values he solved for and it works;
    λ^3 - (sum of diagonal of the matrix)λ^2 + (sum of the diagonal of the adjoint of the matrix)λ - (the determinant of the matrix)

  • @yahyadiaa9679
    @yahyadiaa9679 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You saved me from failing my exam for the 4th time

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wow, that's great

    • @plantmc9319
      @plantmc9319 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dang 4 times that’s crazy. Fr though this dude has the best explanation

    • @saja_22A
      @saja_22A หลายเดือนก่อน

      How did you get out? Lamda? Final output ? ​@@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn

  • @ai_enthusiast78
    @ai_enthusiast78 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    amazing teaching method

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      thanks so much for your comment. And good luck in your academics

  • @chaimaahidji
    @chaimaahidji 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    this lesson is very awesome , thanks so much ☺

  • @scenicsceneBD
    @scenicsceneBD 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It’s to much helpful, love you man ❤❤

  • @nehemiahbalozi5731
    @nehemiahbalozi5731 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Well understood... Thanks

  • @paulowiredu7586
    @paulowiredu7586 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    From your accent, I could spot you're my Ghanaian brother..... Watching your video from the States.
    .

  • @rivieraokapi
    @rivieraokapi 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you my friend, you made it a lot more digestible. What a teacher!!

  • @selly0072
    @selly0072 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    God richly bless you🙏🏽

  • @cxndy_mocha8076
    @cxndy_mocha8076 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is so easy after listening to this. Tysm! 😭

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks so much for your comments and good luck in your studies.

  • @edsonsimbaya1993
    @edsonsimbaya1993 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks, this is very simple explanation

  • @SABRINAHAMID-ok3cz
    @SABRINAHAMID-ok3cz 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    THANKS A LOT

  • @habib97se
    @habib97se 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thank you for the video, you helped med a lot.

  • @user-iy3rq7zg2v
    @user-iy3rq7zg2v 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Think you sif❤❤

  • @wannurfatimahayunibintiwis2844
    @wannurfatimahayunibintiwis2844 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    thank you!!!

  • @stevenkanguya5087
    @stevenkanguya5087 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    THANK YOU VERY MUCH,,, YOU JUST EARNED YOURSELF A SUBCRIBER

  • @BADURELGADIR-dd2ck
    @BADURELGADIR-dd2ck หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thank you for your useful lecture.

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thanks so so much....I'm grateful

    • @ChidiebubeAli
      @ChidiebubeAli หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      For the first eigenvalue, I thought it should not have zero as a value​@@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn

  • @ut_9882
    @ut_9882 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    sorry sir i think there is a small mistake in the value of λ=1,λ=2 and it is equal to λ=-23 not -21

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Please double check your answer, the right values are 1, 2 and 21.

  • @masked_man7745
    @masked_man7745 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Explanation is very good and clear. Keep it up.

  • @OdongoKizito
    @OdongoKizito 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank for the wonderful explaination

  • @pankajthakur8663
    @pankajthakur8663 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent

  • @darcash1738
    @darcash1738 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is awesome! I was wondering, is the best way for this usually the cofactor expansion? Or if we happen to have 1's in our matrix do you think it is more worth it to do Chio's decomposition to make it one dimension lower? I tried the normal 3x3 trick where we add the first two columns on the outside of it to do that but i found this pretty messy

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Wow, really

    • @darcash1738
      @darcash1738 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn honestly I don’t know I guess it depends. This cofactor expansion would be nicest in the case everything else were zeros up top. And you have to get lucky for chio bc the whole diagonal is already excluded due to the -lambda part. I learned Chios condensation a bit ago and I think it’s so cool, it’s just that I rarely find a chance to use it 😂

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yes actually@@darcash1738

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      where do you watch me from? which program do you read and level?@@darcash1738

    • @darcash1738
      @darcash1738 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn I’m from America, and I’m just taking some intro to linear algebra class. I like learning math on my own sometimes too so I just happened across Chios condensation one day.
      I wish we’d learn more cool tricks like that too. Just right now I learned that the characteristic equation for 3x3 is λ^3 -trace(A)*λ^2+Diagonal Minors(A)*λ - |A| = 0. If you have any cool tricks too (determinants, eigenvalues or vectors, etc), please recommend them even if they might be a bit above my current level 😅

  • @helifonseka9611
    @helifonseka9611 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Thank you from Sri lanka! 🙏

  • @efosaomoregie5246
    @efosaomoregie5246 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you bro we love and appreciate you

  • @Twilightaria
    @Twilightaria ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Godddd bless youuu I've been struggling the wholeee day to understand thisss❤❤❤❤❤❤

  • @MORINGELOMANYAKI
    @MORINGELOMANYAKI 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice and reasonable solution

  • @JosephOtieno-zu2rm
    @JosephOtieno-zu2rm 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think you need an oscar award🥳🥳🎉

  • @YasabnehAddisu
    @YasabnehAddisu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    its so tebeda thanku

  • @cherrybuff5991
    @cherrybuff5991 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you from India♥

  • @nesaaqlimakhan
    @nesaaqlimakhan หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    hey , so for the values of eigenvector , our aim should be making R3 to 0 ?

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      not necessarily, the aim is to convert the given matrix to an upper triangular matrix with the leading diagonals being 1. however when there is a zero row, ie a row with all zeros, it should be at the buttom.

  • @Enthub47
    @Enthub47 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Please can you tell me what app you used for this tutorial. The board and pens style in particular. It’s soo smooth 🙂

  • @everything4editing.
    @everything4editing. 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks so much ❤❤❤

  • @ssalijovan123
    @ssalijovan123 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Bless you, but so you have any videos about vector spaces and spaning a vector.

  • @reatbang
    @reatbang 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    𝐓𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐤 you

  • @samaawagih7272
    @samaawagih7272 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Spectacular Explanation.

  • @OsazuwaEro
    @OsazuwaEro 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you sir.. Pls what software do you use?

  • @manuelmakritos
    @manuelmakritos ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow .....I love this explanation

  • @OpareAddoNanaYaw-tg8ni
    @OpareAddoNanaYaw-tg8ni ปีที่แล้ว +1

    At 28:04 why was (-10-10) equal to 0. If I’m not mistaken it should be 20.
    More clarity on this please

  • @georgeasabre6393
    @georgeasabre6393 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You be doing the most 💪🤲

  • @user-ru4vf5se2s
    @user-ru4vf5se2s ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much

  • @mcnosike7935
    @mcnosike7935 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank much for this video it really help

  • @InthipornBunkhan
    @InthipornBunkhan 11 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    My textbook said λI - A and your is A-λI. Is these two method have a different answer? Because at the start I use λI-A but the rest I follow your method.

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  3 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Well you can solve more questions with that approach to see if the answers will be the same, but then my method is what you see in most textbooks.

  • @garpthehero3221
    @garpthehero3221 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    god bless you thank you so much

  • @sanketkumbhar
    @sanketkumbhar ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How to find eigen values & eigen vector corresponding to smallest eigen value in 3 by 3 matrix

    • @sanketkumbhar
      @sanketkumbhar ปีที่แล้ว

      Plz give me thise question answer

  • @annahkerubo6371
    @annahkerubo6371 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In finding eigen values of 21, why did we use row two as the pivot row for reduction and not row 1

  • @edvinaleksandrov1417
    @edvinaleksandrov1417 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very good explanation

  • @sajjalsayjal3640
    @sajjalsayjal3640 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    How we find these eigen values that you write??

  • @AbbSalehi
    @AbbSalehi 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have two original equations with three unknowns ( X, Y, Z). I've just added one extra equation to make the original equations solvable. What should I call this adding process in mathematics? I just need the correct wording for that. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks

  • @meshackmwaniki924
    @meshackmwaniki924 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wonderful sir.

  • @Dee_alh
    @Dee_alh ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wish my professor explains well like you

  • @norgac9103
    @norgac9103 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent explenation. But one point. How i get lamba 1,2,21 without calc ?

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      On your calculator, press mode, then equation in the form ax³ + bx²+cx = 0
      Then type in the values of a b c and d as in the equations

    • @norgac9103
      @norgac9103 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn And if i cant use calc i must use cubic equation or is there another variety ?

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@norgac9103 you can use the factor theorem

    • @norgac9103
      @norgac9103 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Thank you .

    • @norgac9103
      @norgac9103 ปีที่แล้ว

      Bro can I send you one example on custom vectors. I've been counting for maybe 3 hours and I can't get to the vector. I'll send you some money for coffee if you want :D

  • @watsonnampon2993
    @watsonnampon2993 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    please could you show how to obtain 21 as the eigen values

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You can basically use a calculator, of the factor theorem

  • @curtixscapparrotti8141
    @curtixscapparrotti8141 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    well simplified. Gracias

  • @viktordowa
    @viktordowa 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do you always have to make the last line to have all zeros or if you want you can just calculate without making the last line all zeros

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not necessarily, but if there appears a zero row, then it should be at the button

  • @alexkim7270
    @alexkim7270 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Wow thanks for the clear explanation! Can I understand why when you interchange the rows in matrix, it doesn't change the final result?

    • @Spartacus005
      @Spartacus005 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I think it's because the rows are just stand-ins for the equations and the columns for the variables. Therefore, you can put the rows in any order and still be fine because you can solve the equation system in any order. It is once you change the order of the columns that you run into problems and change the finals result.
      If you were to swap Row 1 and Row 2, it'd be the same as completing Row 2 before Row 1. This does not have a bearing on the final result, so you're free to do that. If you were to swap Column 1 and Column 2, you would be switching the coefficients of x1 and x2 variables, which changes the whole system of equations. Is this making sense?

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @Spartacus005 thanks so much for your contribution

  • @allstar7778
    @allstar7778 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Any reason why you are not using krammer's rule which is much simpler than using charachteristic polynomial equation ?

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No reason please, you can use crammer's to solve as well.

    • @allstar7778
      @allstar7778 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn Alright thanks a lot sir for your reply, your video is really helpful. I thought there must be some mathematical reason. Thanks for clearing this. I also prefer charahteristic polynomial, it somehow just clicks in my brain although it is slow process. One quick question, is it necessary to calculate REF as well for computing an eigen vector ? what if we just a put a quadratic equation directly without computing REF ?

  • @KadmielAcquah
    @KadmielAcquah 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    16:53 For lamda 1 ,i think the matrix was not in its row echelon form,if it was can u explain further??

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is in Row echelon form. For Row echelon form, diagonal entries are 1 and the elements of the upper triangular matrix can be any other value. Unless in a case where the elements in a row are all zeros, then it is adviced to put that row at the button. While for reduced row echelon looks like the identity matrix

  • @henokbezabih8648
    @henokbezabih8648 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you very much Sri

  • @user-nf2jr2nh2r
    @user-nf2jr2nh2r 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    would like to teach me an easy method for getting the eigen vectors than eclon because I have failed to understand

  • @ghost3826
    @ghost3826 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Goated 🐐

  • @cclemon2531
    @cclemon2531 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    when calculating the eigenvectors in the case lamda equals to 1, can i just let the x1 be 1 rather than x2 be 1?

  • @FatawYakubu-908
    @FatawYakubu-908 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please for the cubic equation if u get the values to be decimals, How do we solve it

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Usually you will get whole number values, if you get decimals, kindly check if the cubic equation is right

    • @FatawYakubu-908
      @FatawYakubu-908 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn okay thanks

  • @shivanikumari680
    @shivanikumari680 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Can you tell me how to find eigen value of this equation x^3+25x^2+50x-1000 ????

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The eigenvalues are
      -20, -10 and 5.
      Use the factor theorem to do so.

  • @user-zj7bh1oo5r
    @user-zj7bh1oo5r ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you!🙂

  • @nyambemukena5318
    @nyambemukena5318 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How did you jump to 21 as the value lambda

  • @akhileshakhil4390
    @akhileshakhil4390 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    how did you get the roots of the equation, I mean how did you get the eigen values.

  • @NeverTHOUGHTofIT
    @NeverTHOUGHTofIT ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can you do a video about Eugene roots of symmetric matrix that would be good

  • @fediMbf99
    @fediMbf99 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please how you found lambda with third equation like in the video (10:32)

  • @bestanimerecaporiginal
    @bestanimerecaporiginal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Please man what software do you use

  • @rizwann098
    @rizwann098 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love from Kashmir 🍁❤️

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks so so much

    • @rizwann098
      @rizwann098 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn it's my pleasure to get a teacher like u ... I'm pursuing masters degree in economics but maths teacher isn't so good that's I was finding a teacher who can explain these things straight forward....
      ❤️❤️Thank u so much again sir

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @rizwann098 you are most welcome

  • @calvinbasotho8437
    @calvinbasotho8437 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi. I need to know how you simplified that cubid equation to find 3 lambda values

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can combine the factor theorem and the long-division method to obtain the factors of the polynomial. hope you are familiar with the two mentioned above. Especially with the factor theorem, if f(x) is a polynomial of degree more than one and 'a ' is a number, then if f(a) is zero, then (x-a) is a factor of f(x).

  • @reginaldgoka5224
    @reginaldgoka5224 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Coming in clutch I see

  • @Gaayathri_Ganesh
    @Gaayathri_Ganesh ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you so much!!

  • @kubabak4
    @kubabak4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a 3x3 matrice [57 0 24, 0 50 0, 24 0 43] and all calculators and solutions indicate that the +-+ doesn't apply. I was wondering why could this be i.e. to get the right answer you must solve it with the negative : : (57-x)(50-x)(43-x) -24(50-x)(24). I expected it to be positive. Any idea why ?

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Are you sure you have punch in the calculator the right entries?

    • @kubabak4
      @kubabak4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn So the issue was that I ignored the 0s therefore it was +24[(0x0)-(50-x)(24) instead which is non-intuitive.

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Okay

  • @miracle_winter6118
    @miracle_winter6118 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm confused....so is it the same for all examples or the swapping and multiplication will vary? Like.....how do you know what to do? Is the bottom row always supposed to have all 0s?? I'm confused...😢

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It varies, it depends on the question you are solving. The idea is, if there is a zero row, then it should appear at the bottom.

  • @nelsonanthony9898
    @nelsonanthony9898 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    17:33 why do you pick an arbitrary value for x2 but not x1? Will or does it make any difference?

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oh no, it doesn't make any difference, you can either choose for x1 then you use that to find x2. It depends on your preference.

    • @viktordowa
      @viktordowa 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But if there is a negative it will definitely affect your answer, won’t it?

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @viktordowa please a negative where

  • @lauren3441
    @lauren3441 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When solving for lambda 3, column 3 row 3 isn’t it supposed to be -20? 28:40

  • @pianielmdk
    @pianielmdk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    God please help me remember all this for my exam 🙏🏽😢

    • @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn
      @SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Amen.
      The LORD is our helper.

    • @pianielmdk
      @pianielmdk 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SkanCityAcademy_SirJohn thanks 🙏🏽 the question on eigenvalues contained 25% of the marks

  • @Algorithmic26
    @Algorithmic26 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What's mean by eigen value??
    Why do this

  • @Geeta22.08
    @Geeta22.08 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🎉 thankyou

  • @karidjatoucisse3212
    @karidjatoucisse3212 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great jobbbbbb. thanks

  • @danielkadima571
    @danielkadima571 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    with another 3x3 matrix I found the characteristic polynomial, I put the equation which was cubic into the calculator. This way is still difficult to find the eigen values unless I am doing this wrong. So I took the same equation and plugged it into Mathway I found that the roots are decimals?