I picked one up a month or so ago and it hasnt left my wrist. If you dont like the gilt, this isnt the watch for you, but I personally love it. Will be interesting to see what new colorways Tudor releases in the coming years!
It is an almost perfect watch. Dimensions are spot on, adjustability is great and accuracy is very good. Mine runned at around 0-0,5 sec per day. But my date wheel broke after around 2 months. It got stuck between 2 dates and after a bit of spinning it changed date around 11:50pm instead of the usual 3 mins past 12, which was weird. Then after another few spins it worked normal again. Contacted my AD and they advised me to return and apply for repair under warranty. It’s been 5 weeks and still haven’t got it back. Hopefully I get it back soon, really looking forward to see it again in person. Very nice and elegant Tudor watch!
You get what you pay for. Tudor is, and always has been, the poor man’s Rolex. If you want top quality and reliability, get a Rolex. Tudor is not a substitute.
@@whereRbearsTeethI think that's a worn out stereotype. Tudor does its own thing, and isn't a "poor man's" anything. As an owner of both Rolex and Tudor I enjoy both, and I know many others who feel the same.
Not surprised by the QC, my Black Bay has paint from the text on the dial and my father's Pelagos had the lume fall out of the bezel. With mine you can really only see the dial issue under a loupe and sure its under warranty and they would fix it, but honestly, not worth the trouble. I just wish for the money you're spending, they'd do a better job. This one is not for me, never did like the Coke colorway and I'm not a fan of GMTs but I do think its a really nice watch if that's your thing. Great review as always, the best on YT and I watch a lot of watch reviews.
@@Nefville lume falling out of the bezel is crazy but I’ve seen it do the rounds online. Thankfully I haven’t had much issue qc wise until this one. Not a big gmt fan either but if the watch is pretty and happens to have a gmt, I’ll allow I haha. Keep enjoying your black bay! Not much reason to need this when you already have one of its brothers. And appreciate you watching as always 🙏🏻🙏🏻
I think I'd prefer a more rounded Yachtmaster case profile vs the slab sided Sub look. My favorite feature is the "puffy" dial printing. Very premium looking. As always I enjoyed every minute of your review! Thank you.
All your "cons" are aesthetic, so I think considering that, the watch is impressive. This was my grail for 2024 and after trying it on last week, I am sad to say I have to find a new grail GMT. The gilt was too much for me and even though it's thin, the slab sides make it look tall on my super flat wrist. Still an INCREDIBLE watch.
@@jaredstephenson6468 I think the aesthetic of the watch is very important, and arguably what most people will focus on. Most luxury watches aren’t built to a bad standard, so it becomes design choice and aesthetic that differentiate. Surprised even this case felt thick. Hard to find a much thinner gmt!
The design of the Tudor clasp is that you are supposed to hold the outer sides with two fingers and pull to open it. It is extremely easy to open it in that way. I owned 5 Tudor watches, and I think I learned this from Bruce Williams channel back in 2020.
Excellent and very comprehensive review. The QC on your watch was not good. I'm wearing my BB58 while I watch this - I have the OG, black/gilt. Mine is perfect under a loupe and I love the snowflake hands combined with the classic Submariner-style hour indices. Much easier to tell the time than my Sub. I greatly prefer wearing my 58 to my ceramic Sub - and my 58 is a strap monster. It looks superb on a black rubber tropic, an FKM dark red, a dark brown leather strap and a jubilee bracelet. Cheers!
@@dannyg6592 glad to hear you like changing around straps on yours! Probably because I lean dressier in my watch taste, sports watches end up looking more odd on straps to me
I have four Tudors and now I would never buy a watch without a Tfit. I love leather straps but a bracelet has to have a Tfit. I bought the BB41 and opaline gmt and those two didn’t have Tfit at the time in 2023. I put both a Zealande rubber strap with deployment clasp. Expensive but works great. Zealande custom made for those two Tudor watches
Really nice to add to the collection Xavier! Great review as always. i can't say i love this watch, but that's why there are different flavors ice cream. The QC was a bit of a shocker!
I am a Heritage Diver guy but I'd definitely group this into one of Tudor's collectibles. I can see myself owning this alongside a Rolex sub or an explorer. This 58 GMT is very nostalgic and why the hell do watch afficionados consider gold vintage? It is just gold, yes it was present in vintage watches but it does not have to be classed as a copy cat. In my opinion, the 58 GMT can now be differentiated from the dive watch line. Yes, Tudor have issues with their hands, I noticed the gold finishing on the hands for the last heritage black bay was not fully coated around the hands. In my opinion, if it were my watch, I'd return it to get the issue fixed.
I hear your thoughts about this watch on a strap but I'd like to hear your opinion of this watch and other Black Bays on the stock rubber strap that has the end link attached to it.
@@AndrewIsbell unfortunately I’ve never handled it on the rubber strap but I imagine the hint of metal will make it feel more like it belongs there. Another person commented they prefer it on the rubber so there’s definitely a reason they make it that way
Nice review! A question: why do you think the movement is not in-house? It's manufactured by Kenessi that's owned by Tudor. Also, it is possible to see how much you are adjusting the bracelet on the fly. The underside of the clasp has 4-5 little grooves that tell you how much you've extended it.
@@TheWatchOut it’s more just a technicality. I guess you could say it’s in house but from what I understand there’s potential that Kenissi was owned and then purchased by Wilsdorf foundation. Chanel owns a 20% stake too. So it feels to me more like Tudor bought something to make it more in house. The fact they share movements like the b01 also makes me feel like it’s a less in house affair. For all we know they could be outsourced screws or oils or what not. Very few places are fully in house because it’s hard to do. But realistically in house doesn’t mean good quality. Just means one person controls it all and could potentially make an inferior product. At the end of the day who cares if the movements good haha. And true on the micro adjust but I typically am not taking it off and flipping it over to watch what hole the micro adjust is flowing into. Personally feels like an awkward way to handle the watch.
I'm fortunate to have several Tudor watches, including the BB 58 GMT. Of all the watches, this one is on my wrist the most by far. It's not too big, not to heavy, not to tall and it's beautiful!! I love the look of the watch and even after owning it for a few months I still find myself looking at it just to admire the watch.
Stunning watch. I went back and forth between this one and the chrono. Ultimately I went with the chrono as I thought the gilt wouldn't be the best long term fit for me. I like it now but maybe not so much years from now. It's probably my favourite watch on the market currently though. Although if I received a watch with a handset like this one I'd be returning it. Absolutely not acceptable for a watch at this price point. Thankfully my chrono is absolutely perfect on the QC.
maybe its just me, but ive always found tudors claps very easy to pull out. don't use that top part, it's hard that way as you stated, but just pull it from the side. Only takes a flick of your index finger and pops right off.
I came to comment and say this same thing! I just pinch both sides with my thumb and index finger and it comes right open, both on the folding lock and actual clasp. I’m sure that’s the intended way to open it. Great video btw 👌
Have seen both in person but haven’t reviewed. Both nice. Really like that gunmetal grey to the trailtrecker and great wearing case. Probably won’t review either because I’m not trying to buy either right now 😂
Great watch... definitely on my short list. I have the Longines Zulu Time in 39mm, just FYI; you should not pronounce the "s" at the end of Longines, the "s" is silent, in both French and English.
@@robertmatas4192 interesting. The Zulu time is a great watch. Surprise you want this on top of that one. I’d almost go Zulu tile over this one, but to be fair have only had brief hands on.
Do you think we will get a genuine pepsi version? My answer is if they do, I bet you the gilt or gold accents will be taken off in order to keep this model exclusive. Anyways, what do you think?
@@Joe-xo3xy I can see it. Without gilt I don’t doubt it’ll come in a few years. Unless they are trying to not do any colors Rolex typically does but not many other two color combinations they could go for and look good other than the classics
Also, this is considered the first GMT Master Chronometer for Tudor. That's a milestone achievement in their history. 50 to 70 years from now people will crave for this piece because of its "first" for the brand. Same goes with the red bezeled first master chronometer black bay. People call it also the iron man. I cant wait to see patina'd version of these in years to come.
@@10klp I don’t think the clasp size is all that different from previous Tudor’s I’ve handled. You’ll just have to try it on in person. I find Rolex clasps to be big and bulky so I may be the wrong person to ask
@@Kel7S ya didn’t expect the hands to be that scratches but happens to the best of them. Something you could hopefully have sent back under warranty but that would be months without the watch
My LHD , Pro BB Heritage “Burgundy” and “Pepsi” all keep awesome time only the Pro is 3 seconds faster 😊 Master or not it’s nothing special wish Tudor have more dial colours on their dials plus brush cases as well remove or give option rivets or no rivets… few more years bet they start out on the magnifier on the date 😂! Man enjoy the watch it’s a Tudor no gold or platinum, diamonds bla bla ! Plus hope prices don’t start sky rocket 🚀 like Omega it’s a steel a Seamaster cost 12 k the anniversary Bond edition or even the speedmaster 5 years ago was 3500 € now it’s double 😳the manual hesalite model should have bought it but at time had other priorities now only pre-owned hope this vibe goes down plus Dealers used to make nice discount’s now it’s “fashion” have a automatic/mechanical watch…. Since was boy earn my first cash bought some cool watches unfortunately had some “bad friends/chief’s ” took all my watches even some nice DuPont lighter’s given from my dad …. Now always on the fence wearing expensive items world is crazy they kill you for few thousand even lesss … Man remove that white rubber strap put a black tropical old school on !
@knight’s did you buy the watch new at an Tudor AD ? Or is it a pre-owned man ? Bit awkward as I’ve myself bought already few Tudor’s and never ever saw those imperfections man 😳! 4 k plus for that watch with those flaws specifically on the hand’s bit strange have you saw it with a Lupe ? If the watch is new or even pre-owned I’ll take it back that’s not normal on eve a Seiko man !!!!!
@@eighthkid5497 it’s a fair point. Of course you could always look with a loupe before purchase or send it in under warranty, but warranty needed on something brand new is annoying
Who’s this dude !!!!!??? I’m sure the lens aren’t well clean never saw this newer Tudor versions with QC issues like this hands , or even is father Pelagos line faulty 😳 Mr how many luxury watches did you buy on an AD man ???? If you don’t like it take it back man ! Or make a comparison with your Lorier with same lenses you make with same camera bet it’s same quality 🤓
This is not a high price point for a luxury watch. What watch in this price category doesn’t have the same so-called “imperfections” of the type mentioned here.
@@hemantishwaran5741 This is a high price point for a watch. Not a high price point for a luxury watch, sure. But just because something can costs millions of dollars, doesn’t mean there doesn’t exist a lower boundary where it’s relatively as good as it’ll get and anything more leads to diminishing returns. Grand Seikos don’t have these imperfections and start at 2k, I’ve had Christopher wards that have better handsets and those are usually around 1k, I’ve had timex who have had better handsets. This is a qc issue and rougher than should be expected than really anything over 500 dollars
Speaking as someone who prefers ETA movements, on Tudors and otherwise, your claim that this movement isn’t truly in-house is completely mistaken. The movements are designed by Tudor and built in their factory. Yes they let Chanel own a tiny stake in the movement operation but the controlling interest is HWF and it all happens under their direction. They let these companies use a Kenissi name but Tudor is very clear even when giving factory tours that the movement operation is part of Tudor. This is actually more “in-house” than Rolex’s movement operation! Rolex movements come from Aegler, with whom Rolex eventually got an exclusivity contract, but was its own completely separate company still owned by its founders beyond that until Rolex very recently bought them, bringing it officially under the Rolex umbrella. In contrast, Tudor’s movement division was built from the ground up by HWF, most likely to try to take over some of the space left in the market by ETA’s exit.
People whine about too much gilt = buy a vintage watch and complain it looks too old. Just go buy a Rolex GMT Master-II. You do not deserve this watch.
Some of your criticisms is due to you mis-use of the function. For example, your criticism on the T-Fit results from your wrong perception of how to handle the t-fit.
For the price the QC on the hands and dial are frankly appalling - shows a lack of respect by Tudor for their customers. Christ, AliExpress watches have a better finish!!
If it had a gloss black dial I'd consider buying it. The matt black dial doesn't look right against the glossy bezel. It's jarring. Chewdah. Poor man's Rolex.
Having a poor man's Rolex is better than being a poor man with a Rolex. That said, I'd say that about 50% of Rolex buyers are well to do. Worse than that...I assume that most "Rolex buyers" are buying fakes or are faking being rich. But that's just me and I'm sure a few will be impressed.
Rolex, Lambos, Gucci, Louis Vuitton and can all be faked. Real wealth is when someone has lived in their home for over 5 years in a $2 million home and the deed is in their name. I drive a luxury car. So what! I'm not rich. I got it for a great deal. I don't try to fool anyone. I didn't buy it to try to look rich. I bought because I like it.
That's my Dream watch . I just love the color combinations and the size just perfect for me. One day I'll buy it
I got attacked wearing my tudor
@greenrush4313 were they tryna rob you ?
@greenrush4313 I always wear my precious or expensive watch only for important day, but most of the days I'll wear Seiko and G-Shock.
@@mysinfpow311 yes they got the watch
I picked one up a month or so ago and it hasnt left my wrist. If you dont like the gilt, this isnt the watch for you, but I personally love it. Will be interesting to see what new colorways Tudor releases in the coming years!
Congrats, and honestly the gilt doesn’t feel too dramatic either. In person it makes sense.
It is an almost perfect watch. Dimensions are spot on, adjustability is great and accuracy is very good. Mine runned at around 0-0,5 sec per day. But my date wheel broke after around 2 months. It got stuck between 2 dates and after a bit of spinning it changed date around 11:50pm instead of the usual 3 mins past 12, which was weird. Then after another few spins it worked normal again. Contacted my AD and they advised me to return and apply for repair under warranty. It’s been 5 weeks and still haven’t got it back. Hopefully I get it back soon, really looking forward to see it again in person. Very nice and elegant Tudor watch!
You get what you pay for. Tudor is, and always has been, the poor man’s Rolex. If you want top quality and reliability, get a Rolex. Tudor is not a substitute.
How cringe is that reply 🤣
@@whereRbearsTeethI think that's a worn out stereotype. Tudor does its own thing, and isn't a "poor man's" anything. As an owner of both Rolex and Tudor I enjoy both, and I know many others who feel the same.
@@Nefvilleit's very cringe.
Always sucks to send out a watch you like to repair! Hope you get it back soon and I’m glad you are liking it. It’s a killer piece.
Not surprised by the QC, my Black Bay has paint from the text on the dial and my father's Pelagos had the lume fall out of the bezel. With mine you can really only see the dial issue under a loupe and sure its under warranty and they would fix it, but honestly, not worth the trouble. I just wish for the money you're spending, they'd do a better job. This one is not for me, never did like the Coke colorway and I'm not a fan of GMTs but I do think its a really nice watch if that's your thing. Great review as always, the best on YT and I watch a lot of watch reviews.
@@Nefville lume falling out of the bezel is crazy but I’ve seen it do the rounds online. Thankfully I haven’t had much issue qc wise until this one. Not a big gmt fan either but if the watch is pretty and happens to have a gmt, I’ll allow I haha. Keep enjoying your black bay! Not much reason to need this when you already have one of its brothers. And appreciate you watching as always 🙏🏻🙏🏻
I think I'd prefer a more rounded Yachtmaster case profile vs the slab sided Sub look. My favorite feature is the "puffy" dial printing. Very premium looking. As always I enjoyed every minute of your review! Thank you.
100% that more rounded shape should be the norm. Much better on wrist. And yes the printing here is a winner!
All your "cons" are aesthetic, so I think considering that, the watch is impressive. This was my grail for 2024 and after trying it on last week, I am sad to say I have to find a new grail GMT. The gilt was too much for me and even though it's thin, the slab sides make it look tall on my super flat wrist. Still an INCREDIBLE watch.
@@jaredstephenson6468 I think the aesthetic of the watch is very important, and arguably what most people will focus on. Most luxury watches aren’t built to a bad standard, so it becomes design choice and aesthetic that differentiate. Surprised even this case felt thick. Hard to find a much thinner gmt!
If you can accept quartz in your life, check out the Grand Seiko SBGN003/027. I have the 003 and it’s my daily. Absolutely love it. Grab and go
Try Rolex GMT Master-II. This is your current only chance to find a “better” grail GMT.
@@ivanoschen Modern design Rolex are worse vs from the past.
Same here. It fits AMAZING, but the gilt is way too much
The design of the Tudor clasp is that you are supposed to hold the outer sides with two fingers and pull to open it. It is extremely easy to open it in that way. I owned 5 Tudor watches, and I think I learned this from Bruce Williams channel back in 2020.
I wish they framed the date window. It looks kinda meh.
@@imarasnothere I get that. I do like the step down they currently have but framing in gold could’ve looked nice
Rootbeer vibes always been my favorite
does the blue vessel turns red when you put a blue light like the rolex?
Excellent and very comprehensive review. The QC on your watch was not good. I'm wearing my BB58 while I watch this - I have the OG, black/gilt. Mine is perfect under a loupe and I love the snowflake hands combined with the classic Submariner-style hour indices. Much easier to tell the time than my Sub. I greatly prefer wearing my 58 to my ceramic Sub - and my 58 is a strap monster. It looks superb on a black rubber tropic, an FKM dark red, a dark brown leather strap and a jubilee bracelet. Cheers!
@@dannyg6592 glad to hear you like changing around straps on yours! Probably because I lean dressier in my watch taste, sports watches end up looking more odd on straps to me
I have four Tudors and now I would never buy a watch without a Tfit. I love leather straps but a bracelet has to have a Tfit. I bought the BB41 and opaline gmt and those two didn’t have Tfit at the time in 2023. I put both a Zealande rubber strap with deployment clasp. Expensive but works great. Zealande custom made for those two Tudor watches
Really nice to add to the collection Xavier! Great review as always. i can't say i love this watch, but that's why there are different flavors ice cream. The QC was a bit of a shocker!
Not the best watch in the world(and mine is gone 😂) but it is a pretty good piece. I was surprised by the hands too
I am a Heritage Diver guy but I'd definitely group this into one of Tudor's collectibles. I can see myself owning this alongside a Rolex sub or an explorer. This 58 GMT is very nostalgic and why the hell do watch afficionados consider gold vintage? It is just gold, yes it was present in vintage watches but it does not have to be classed as a copy cat. In my opinion, the 58 GMT can now be differentiated from the dive watch line. Yes, Tudor have issues with their hands, I noticed the gold finishing on the hands for the last heritage black bay was not fully coated around the hands. In my opinion, if it were my watch, I'd return it to get the issue fixed.
@@Joe-xo3xy agreed this one can sit aside with some classic Rolex’s very nicely.
Try pinching the sides of the clasp to undo it instead of the nail nick.
I hear your thoughts about this watch on a strap but I'd like to hear your opinion of this watch and other Black Bays on the stock rubber strap that has the end link attached to it.
@@AndrewIsbell unfortunately I’ve never handled it on the rubber strap but I imagine the hint of metal will make it feel more like it belongs there. Another person commented they prefer it on the rubber so there’s definitely a reason they make it that way
Nice review!
A question: why do you think the movement is not in-house? It's manufactured by Kenessi that's owned by Tudor.
Also, it is possible to see how much you are adjusting the bracelet on the fly. The underside of the clasp has 4-5 little grooves that tell you how much you've extended it.
@@TheWatchOut it’s more just a technicality. I guess you could say it’s in house but from what I understand there’s potential that Kenissi was owned and then purchased by Wilsdorf foundation. Chanel owns a 20% stake too. So it feels to me more like Tudor bought something to make it more in house. The fact they share movements like the b01 also makes me feel like it’s a less in house affair. For all we know they could be outsourced screws or oils or what not. Very few places are fully in house because it’s hard to do. But realistically in house doesn’t mean good quality. Just means one person controls it all and could potentially make an inferior product. At the end of the day who cares if the movements good haha.
And true on the micro adjust but I typically am not taking it off and flipping it over to watch what hole the micro adjust is flowing into. Personally feels like an awkward way to handle the watch.
@@theknightswatch Fair enough. I don't really care about in-house or not. I have the blackbay 54 and I love it. It's a reliable, no fuss watch.
Thanks for the honest review!
I'm fortunate to have several Tudor watches, including the BB 58 GMT. Of all the watches, this one is on my wrist the most by far. It's not too big, not to heavy, not to tall and it's beautiful!! I love the look of the watch and even after owning it for a few months I still find myself looking at it just to admire the watch.
Yep, same experience since june 24
Stunning watch. I went back and forth between this one and the chrono. Ultimately I went with the chrono as I thought the gilt wouldn't be the best long term fit for me. I like it now but maybe not so much years from now. It's probably my favourite watch on the market currently though. Although if I received a watch with a handset like this one I'd be returning it. Absolutely not acceptable for a watch at this price point. Thankfully my chrono is absolutely perfect on the QC.
Glad to hear your chrono is in good condition. Keep enjoying it! And agreed if I was going to keep this watch I would send it off to repair
Sold my chrono panda cause hardly worn it. This gmt has hardly left my 18,5 cm wrist. Fantastic watch in anyway.
T-fit adjustments can be done with the watch on your wrist!!!! try it! Its awesome!! The best watch of the year by far...
Hard to argue with and interesting, didn’t consider it could be done on wrist
Love to see the Lorier! I’ve had my Neptune no date for about a month and I’m in love with it.
About the same with me haha. Has the first version but that was mainly for review. This is the best yet to me
Hi @@theknightswatch love your videos! Will you be reviewing the Neptune? I want to know if you've made your peace with the bracelet taper 😜
@@LukitoNumberOne thanks! Yes I’ll be reviewing it next month. They’ve definitely fixed it. This Neptune I’ll be keeping and the bracelet is better
Pull the clasp from the opposite side and it will open with absolute ease.
I am confused about the straps: i am getting soon a bb58 gmt steel and i understood the strap cannot be changed…
Interesting. The strap can 100% be changed. Just has a little bar holding the bracelet in.
maybe its just me, but ive always found tudors claps very easy to pull out. don't use that top part, it's hard that way as you stated, but just pull it from the side. Only takes a flick of your index finger and pops right off.
@@Mackster248 interesting take. Never tried it that way but will have to. Annoying though that the easy way isn’t the intended one 😂
@@theknightswatch haha my thoughts exactly. But give it a shot!
I came to comment and say this same thing! I just pinch both sides with my thumb and index finger and it comes right open, both on the folding lock and actual clasp. I’m sure that’s the intended way to open it. Great video btw 👌
Have uou done a review of rhe fxd and the Nodus trailtrekker be interesting to hear your view on rhese
Have seen both in person but haven’t reviewed. Both nice. Really like that gunmetal grey to the trailtrecker and great wearing case. Probably won’t review either because I’m not trying to buy either right now 😂
Great watch... definitely on my short list. I have the Longines Zulu Time in 39mm, just FYI; you should not pronounce the "s" at the end of Longines, the "s" is silent, in both French and English.
@@robertmatas4192 interesting. The Zulu time is a great watch. Surprise you want this on top of that one. I’d almost go Zulu tile over this one, but to be fair have only had brief hands on.
I’ve tried the watch and much prefer it on the original rubber strap!
@@cosmodoc good to hear it’s nice on the rubber too!
Do you think we will get a genuine pepsi version? My answer is if they do, I bet you the gilt or gold accents will be taken off in order to keep this model exclusive. Anyways, what do you think?
@@Joe-xo3xy I can see it. Without gilt I don’t doubt it’ll come in a few years. Unless they are trying to not do any colors Rolex typically does but not many other two color combinations they could go for and look good other than the classics
Also, this is considered the first GMT Master Chronometer for Tudor. That's a milestone achievement in their history. 50 to 70 years from now people will crave for this piece because of its "first" for the brand. Same goes with the red bezeled first master chronometer black bay. People call it also the iron man. I cant wait to see patina'd version of these in years to come.
How long was your wait to get the watch from your AD?
@@KirkGold about a month
Is this watch with the new buckle more close to the Rolex? The older buckle on the Tudors are so big and bulky in my opinion
@@10klp I don’t think the clasp size is all that different from previous Tudor’s I’ve handled. You’ll just have to try it on in person. I find Rolex clasps to be big and bulky so I may be the wrong person to ask
As far as the clasp goes, instead of trying to dig your finger under tab to pull it open, grasp it on the sides and pull it out.
Interesting, I’ll have to try that
I really wanted the monochrome Black Bay in 39mm..
@@r3dsnow757 maybe soon!
Loving these micro shots! I dont think thats acceptable for the price point, sad to see. Thanks for the review
@@Kel7S ya didn’t expect the hands to be that scratches but happens to the best of them. Something you could hopefully have sent back under warranty but that would be months without the watch
I’m waiting for them to add the 5 link bracelet to this but I fear I may be waiting forever. Probably don’t want to encroach on Rolex too much.
I can see it happening. They have it on pretty much everything else
My LHD , Pro BB Heritage “Burgundy” and “Pepsi” all keep awesome time only the Pro is 3 seconds faster 😊
Master or not it’s nothing special wish Tudor have more dial colours on their dials plus brush cases as well remove or give option rivets or no rivets… few more years bet they start out on the magnifier on the date 😂!
Man enjoy the watch it’s a Tudor no gold or platinum, diamonds bla bla !
Plus hope prices don’t start sky rocket 🚀 like Omega it’s a steel a Seamaster cost 12 k the anniversary Bond edition or even the speedmaster 5 years ago was 3500 € now it’s double 😳the manual hesalite model should have bought it but at time had other priorities now only pre-owned hope this vibe goes down plus Dealers used to make nice discount’s now it’s “fashion” have a automatic/mechanical watch…. Since was boy earn my first cash bought some cool watches unfortunately had some “bad friends/chief’s ” took all my watches even some nice DuPont lighter’s given from my dad ….
Now always on the fence wearing expensive items world is crazy they kill you for few thousand even lesss …
Man remove that white rubber strap put a black tropical old school on !
@knight’s did you buy the watch new at an Tudor AD ?
Or is it a pre-owned man ?
Bit awkward as I’ve myself bought already few Tudor’s and never ever saw those imperfections man 😳!
4 k plus for that watch with those flaws specifically on the hand’s bit strange have you saw it with a Lupe ?
If the watch is new or even pre-owned I’ll take it back that’s not normal on eve a Seiko man !!!!!
@@69fastfurious yes bought new from an AD, no didn’t check it with a loupe. Live and learn. Qc quality varies and this watch is an example of that
Very nice!
you sure about its authenticity? :)
@@umutaydogdu1502 bought from a boutique so pretty sure
QC issues are a deal killer. You would never see a grand seiko with those issues.
@@eighthkid5497 it’s a fair point. Of course you could always look with a loupe before purchase or send it in under warranty, but warranty needed on something brand new is annoying
they need to get rid of the faux rivets and patina,
Faux rivets yes. Patina works here and white honestly might’ve been too contrary but I get you!
Tudor QA is a problem :))
Movement not really in house? Really? It’s literally built IN THE SAME BUILDING.
@@mach78fl370 next to house then
Who’s this dude !!!!!??? I’m sure the lens aren’t well clean never saw this newer Tudor versions with QC issues like this hands , or even is father Pelagos line faulty 😳
Mr how many luxury watches did you buy on an AD man ????
If you don’t like it take it back man ! Or make a comparison with your Lorier with same lenses you make with same camera bet it’s same quality 🤓
This is not a high price point for a luxury watch. What watch in this price category doesn’t have the same so-called “imperfections” of the type mentioned here.
@@hemantishwaran5741 This is a high price point for a watch. Not a high price point for a luxury watch, sure. But just because something can costs millions of dollars, doesn’t mean there doesn’t exist a lower boundary where it’s relatively as good as it’ll get and anything more leads to diminishing returns.
Grand Seikos don’t have these imperfections and start at 2k, I’ve had Christopher wards that have better handsets and those are usually around 1k, I’ve had timex who have had better handsets. This is a qc issue and rougher than should be expected than really anything over 500 dollars
Speaking as someone who prefers ETA movements, on Tudors and otherwise, your claim that this movement isn’t truly in-house is completely mistaken.
The movements are designed by Tudor and built in their factory. Yes they let Chanel own a tiny stake in the movement operation but the controlling interest is HWF and it all happens under their direction. They let these companies use a Kenissi name but Tudor is very clear even when giving factory tours that the movement operation is part of Tudor.
This is actually more “in-house” than Rolex’s movement operation! Rolex movements come from Aegler, with whom Rolex eventually got an exclusivity contract, but was its own completely separate company still owned by its founders beyond that until Rolex very recently bought them, bringing it officially under the Rolex umbrella.
In contrast, Tudor’s movement division was built from the ground up by HWF, most likely to try to take over some of the space left in the market by ETA’s exit.
I got attacked wearing my tudor
People whine about too much gilt = buy a vintage watch and complain it looks too old. Just go buy a Rolex GMT Master-II. You do not deserve this watch.
Some of your criticisms is due to you mis-use of the function. For example, your criticism on the T-Fit results from your wrong perception of how to handle the t-fit.
What’s the correct way to use it?
Chunky at 12mm
For the price the QC on the hands and dial are frankly appalling - shows a lack of respect by Tudor for their customers. Christ, AliExpress watches have a better finish!!
Two things I really dislike about this watch: the faux rivets and the gold color
If it had a gloss black dial I'd consider buying it. The matt black dial doesn't look right against the glossy bezel. It's jarring. Chewdah. Poor man's Rolex.
Having a poor man's Rolex is better than being a poor man with a Rolex. That said, I'd say that about 50% of Rolex buyers are well to do. Worse than that...I assume that most "Rolex buyers" are buying fakes or are faking being rich. But that's just me and I'm sure a few will be impressed.
Rolex, Lambos, Gucci, Louis Vuitton and can all be faked. Real wealth is when someone has lived in their home for over 5 years in a $2 million home and the deed is in their name. I drive a luxury car. So what! I'm not rich. I got it for a great deal. I don't try to fool anyone. I didn't buy it to try to look rich. I bought because I like it.
I got attacked wearing my tudor