'I'm Not Defending Jon Jones!'

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 29 มิ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 5

  • @t3chn070
    @t3chn070 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Okay the issue here is what the fuck is Dana’s idea of active? He fought one time in the last 4 years. Hes inactive, regardless of reason. He’s been so inactive that he went from a younger fighter to an old fighter and in that time frame he’s had one fight lol.

  • @free9ondo
    @free9ondo หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Many previous champions have had to vacate their title because of injury. Just because Jones is one of the greatest and has an impressive resume, doesn’t mean he is exempt from the rules. Jamahal Hill, Jiri Prochazka, and Dominick Cruz have all lost their belts due to injury. If Dana is gonna coddle him and let him keep the belt he should at least be fighting Tom.

  • @dans7637
    @dans7637  25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Like and subscribe for more entertaining content! ☺️

  • @will4486
    @will4486 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dana needs to chill and get some perspective man. I respect him but he’s just so angry and gets stuck on opinions and positions like this, so argumentative.

  • @illuviium
    @illuviium หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I understand what he means
    Everyone does
    Even you. He means to say that Jon jones (while active) is one of the most terrifying beings and the most dominant and most impressive resume in the UFC and since he’s not active anymore, it shouldn’t diminish any of his work.
    The issue here is… we all disagree. Me
    You
    The entire community..
    And something has to be done about Dana’s mindset over this.
    NOT TAKING ANYTHING AWAY BY FROM JONES. He’s the GOAT. But there are people absolutely making hard ass names for themselves in the UFC as we live and breath and Dana is stuck rooted to a resume that nobody really needs to remember with urgency. Of course we can always hang onto the memory but how about we focus on the people tearing up the game today. Now