"The Feminisation of The Church" | Prof. Nancy Pearcey
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 พ.ย. 2024
- In this clip John speaks with Prof. Nancy Pearcey about the role of women in the church past and present.
See the full interview here: • "The Happiest Wives in...
Nancy Pearcey is a bestselling author and speaker. A former agnostic, she was hailed in The Economist as “America’s pre-eminent evangelical Protestant female intellectual.” Her work has appeared in The Washington Post, The Washington Times, First Things, Human Events, American Thinker, Daily Caller, The Federalist, CNSNews, and Fox News. She has appeared on NPR, C-SPAN, and Fox & Friends. She is currently a professor and scholar in residence at Houston Christian University. Pearcey’s books have been translated into 19 languages and include Total Truth, The Soul of Science, Saving Leonardo, Finding Truth, Love Thy Body, and The Toxic War on Masculinity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conversations feature John Anderson, former Deputy Prime Minister of Australia, interviewing the world's foremost thought leaders about today's pressing social, cultural and political issues.
John believes proper, robust dialogue is necessary if we are to maintain our social strength and cohesion. As he puts it; "You cannot get good public policy out of a bad public debate."
If you value this discussion and want to see more like it, make sure you subscribe to the channel here: / @johnandersonmedia
And stay right up to date with all the conversations by subscribing to the newsletter here: johnanderson.n...
Follow John on Twitter: / johnandersonac
Follow John on Facebook: / johnandersonac
Follow John on Instagram: / johnandersonac
Support the channel: johnanderson.n...
Website: johnanderson.n...
Podcast: johnanderson.n...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Website: www.nancypearc...
X (Formerly Twitter): / nancyrpearcey
Facebook: / nancy.pearcey.7
![กี่หมื่นฟ้า | Your Sky Series EP.1 [1/4]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vLGjxFL6U_I/mqdefault.jpg)
The problem is not that the Church respects women and values children, but that it neither respects nor values good men.
On Mothers’ Day, the sermon will be all in praise of motherhood. On Father’s’ Day, the sermon will scold men and demand that they shape up.
Men are the invisible members, unless there is a need for more money or heavy lifting. There are children’s ministries, teens ministries, women’s ministries…. but rarely a men’s ministry, and if there is one, it will meet infrequently and will be focused on everything except what men need.
There is a difference between serving, and being a serf. If you want to talk about Christ as a model, keep in mind how little he brooked argument and how often he was prepared to say tough and “hurtful” things.
A hearty Amen.
@peterwebb8732
Exactly why early churches had elders and leaders but no pastors. Speaking was democratic. Tithes and offerings were collected for poor people and occasionally traveling apostles.
Now tithes and offerings are bribes to pastors to take responsibility away.
Ever notice how so many churches that praise mothers on mother’s day and scold men on father’s day often have gaggles of single mothers fawning over the pastor? Even if platonic, so many male pastors have their creepy “holy harems” of single women who idolize the pastor. If churches had the integrity to get rid of pastors and encourage men to be active as they were in the original churches, we’d see both men and healthy (non-codependent, addicted to crumbs of attention from emotionally unavailable men i.e. pastors) women returning to churches and we’d see churches returning to serving their communities instead of existing to serve the pastor’s ego.
I love saying that modern holy men need to show Christ like behavior to money changers.
You're right, except it is cause women are "respected" , and for doing nothing but existing. They're respected above men, therefore catered to women. And women don't have the same morality as men, so church is going to lose its moral authority.
And you're going to have single mommies there to find a daddy instead of worried about the community.
I have heard those same sermons, quite the turn off for me anyway
So, when do we get to hear about the feminisation of the church part?
I think we just experienced it.
@@toon2u1 Yeah, where?
@@daveb224Nancy seems to have gone on a tangent and this guestion is not really the main topic of the broader interview.
If you have intrest in this topic, I would recomend a 4 part video lecture series "Men for God" by David Pawson based on his book "Leadership is Male". The lectures can be found on TH-cam.
😂😂
I thought the question was about the feminization of church, but instead she talked a lot about how christianity values women and children. Interesting, but still not an answer.
Probably have to get the entire interview. Nancy Pearce is not an apologist for the feminization of the Church, believe me.,
Church is feminized becouse it lacks male membership. Pastors who constantly preach to a mainly female audience over time soften their message. In fact their whole character softens to the point that female pastors are more masculine than male pastors whose congregations are mostly women.
David Pawson points this out in his book "Leadership is Male". He makes the case that without strong male participation in local churches, Christianity is doomed. He was greatly struck by the contrast between male attendace in churches and in mosques in England. Pawson warned that unless Christians reclaim men for God, England will become an islamic country.
@@santtuhyytiainen No, the reason the Church has changed is because the Church has been infiltrated by Communists.
Five days a week , my job is telling me what to do. Saturday my wife is telling me what to do. Sunday I want quiet to prepare for the coming week. Is that so bad?
If you are a Christian, yes. We are told in the Bible to gather together and worship.
Boys and men are not being affirmed . We need to consciously affirm boys and men’s place in the world 🙏
I'm not disagreeing; you've got a very valid point. But I've long thought that men and boys need to be challenged. That they need to be presented with tasks that call for commitment and boldness. There are plenty of spiritual battles that need to be waged with, prayer, fasting, and outspoken opposition or support.
Males are not only not being affirmed but we're being demonised and discriminated against. That's why more of them are walking away.
I think there is room for femininity and masculinity together in the church. However, I agree that in the evangelical church, there is a lean towards emotional wooing of congregants in the collective worship and preaching. I didn't see that growing up. Although, when I was growing up, there was much more emphasis on moral behavior... maybe to an extreme.
What caused that to change?
@@shaneashby5890 I think there became an emphasis on "church growth", as in, bringing more people into the local church. I think that led to particular strategies like making church atmosphere less formal and more fun, and more of an "emotional experience."
I'm not saying church can't be fun, but it should look different to the world than a rock concert.
The strong father archetype has been kicked to the curb. Basically the foundation of Christianity. For the sake of trying to bring back prisoners it is no longer worthwhile.
Bossy women, male simps, family law court, msm, police just to name a few.
See the Roman Catholic Church (see the Traditional Latin Mass).
@@kevinphillips150I attend the Tridentine. I’m considering converting to Western Orthodoxy if Bergoglio pushes the women deacon thing through.
So Roman woman were never unfaithful themselves?
I think she couldn't answer, maybe? Seems like the most likely explanation why she answered like a politician, by not answering.
Althou what she said was very interesting. Should ask more uneasy questions of her ;)
Or maybe she went off on a tangent and forgot what the point was. This is part of a longer interview, I think, so perhaps she addresses this in another context. But you're quite right. She never answers the question here.
I am not a Christian but this historical dimension to the Jesus story is fascinating. The Roman acceptance of "Boy Love" seems bizarre to us today but many married Emperors were accompanied by boy companions on state business. Another point was the infanticide issue, recently an archaeological dig unearthed the remains of 100 newly born infants in a pit. Some experts believe it's possible they were discarded by prostitutes.
America(
I wish I had been such a boy for a noble
How good Jesus is.
There was about 20 secs that actually had to do with 'the feminisation of the church in this video.
The Lord Jesus Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again the third day (1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV). Getting water baptized DOESN'T save us (1 Corinthians 1:17 KJV). We are saved by grace through faith, not works (Ephesians 2:8-9 KJV).
I think this Nancy chap is okay. Seems to know her stuff- surprisingly- as these issues are not widely known or are just ignored. It's AMAZING how often professors at my glittering School of Classics at uni just stared blankly and uncomprehendingly when I would draw everyone's attention to many such remarkable behaviours in those societies. Taught me a lot about academics! So well done Nancy. Our world is mostly asleep.
She is a former atheist who came to Christ under Francis Schaefer at his LaBri Fellowship in Switzerland in the late ‘60’s, early 70’s.
Great information shared but, it wasn't addressing the question asked. I could see what Prof. Pearcey shared as perhaps setting the stage for an actual address of the issue raised.
In truth, the Body of Christ is primarily spiritual, not physical and cannot be feminized or masculinized., yet it may have characteristics of both but not based on a physical standard but on the significance of each as a facet of God's character and nature. That's my understanding.
What we see with our eyes here on Earth is a convolution of souls, bodies, traditions, customs, preferences and agendas... and not all of them are generated by the Holy Spirit.
The Adversary operates just as he did in the beginning. He appeals to the vulnerable to undermine the strength of unity and order. The "uncovered" woman is drawn in by an appeal to cover herself without dependency on the male. In today's society women generate a dependable stream of monetary and social value which is easily exploited by those motivated by money and power. All "shepherds" are not good shepherds.
I thank the Christian Brothers for not entering a church for 60 years.
Misleading video title.
*Hallelujah!!!! The daily jesus devotional has been a huge part of my transformation, God is good 🙌🏼🙌🏼🙌🏼was owning a loan of $47,000 to the bank for my son's brain surgery (Oscar), Now I'm no longer in debt after lI invested $8,000 and got my payout of m $270,500 every months,God bless Maria luisa Abrams 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸.*
Hello how do you make such monthly ?? I'm a born Christian and sometimes I feel so down 🤦 of myself because of low finance but I still believe in God.
Thanks to my co-worker (Alex) who suggested Mrs Maria luisa Abrams.
She's a licensed broker in the states 🇺🇸
I remember giving her my first savings $20,000 and she opened a brokerage account for me it turned out to be the best thing that ever happened to me.
After I raised up to 325k trading with her I bought a new House and a car here in the states 🇺🇸🇺🇸 also paid for my son's surgery (Oscar). Glory to God.shalom.
The valuing children thing is a jewish tradition, we can see from all the stories of people praying for children etc etc . From abraham on. Maybe you are comparing it to Roman life?
OMG.
What she is saying is simply comparing apples with pears. She is talking about the upper class and not the common folk. Common folk didn't have slaves or any of the things rich people had. A bit dishonest I would say.
@@tdevry Right?!? And why is she so intense? And she forgets to mention all the witch burning… and from what I have read, women didn’t exactly have a very high status in Church.
- Why can’t she just be honest about things? I just don’t get it.. Either she’s deliberately lying or she’s completely brainwashed. It’s so off putting.
THE NUNS
In the 50s I attended a Catholic boys military academy where the Sisters of Mercy handled the classrooms and WWII veteran, retired ex-military handled the military side.
The hands-off military guys were pushovers compared to the hands-on nuns who wouldn't hesitate to give you whatfer when you got out of line. Those loving, caring women poured a lot of solid foundation in my life.
Based on my experience, strategically speaking when it comes to raising children, women are the best disciplinarians in the home/family structure with Dads always backing them up.
When Mom says no, it's no.
My upbringing was totally opposite yours. The men in my family were always the disciplinarians. I went to Catholic school too. Even in high school the dean of discipline was a man.
@@clintdavis7434I can only speak from my own experience.
My Dad was in Patton's 3rd Army and fought at the Battle of the Bulge. And standing behind my Mom at all times, myself and two brothers were the beneficiaries of their team work.
@@MichaelE.Dourouxyour experience IS anecdotal though, there is a lot of evidence that suggests that without the men to “back them up” women have a much more difficult time trying to instill discipline.
Hence why children raised by single mothers are much more likely to become criminals than those raised by a single father.
Well, this is depressing . . .
EVE SPEAKS
I speak not merely as a woman. Nor do I speak as to a mere man.
I speak as God’s Eve Woman. I speak to God’s Adam Man.
Man, whence came you? What purpose? What plan?
What duty was placed in your care, Man?
What turned you that you bolted and ran?
From the Garden. From the Promised Land.
Look around, Man. Look at Eve Woman.
Where did she come from? Out of Man.
Man in union with Woman: God’s plan.
Back to the Garden. Back to the Land.
Adam and Eve: the work of God’s hand.
Fruit producing seed: splendid man!
Seed bearing fruit: glorious woman!
God would that mortals obey His Plan.
I speak as God’s Eve Woman.
I speak to God’s Adam Man.
Putting the correct value on women and children has been a very good thing but the idea that the feminization of the church has been a good thing is flat falsehood. The church in the west is by and large failing and mostly ineffective to say the least. The fact that men don’t go or don’t put effort into church is the problem and the church needs to start changing how it operates so men have their roles recognized again. That doesn’t mean putting women and kids down but it definitely needs to focus on men and what they need to thrive over women and kids.
Women and children have always been correctly valued. Your falling for the gaslighting.
It is the only way to combat its pedophilisation.
That’s literally everywhere not just the Church.
Nowhere else bans women - specifically to allow pedophiles a free hand. Just the Church.
This is the same exact revisionism you hear from women converted to Islam and how Islam is a feminist religion. Absolutely ridiculous.
Church and religion is so last century.
Get with the times, spirituality is the modern concept, no doctrine, no deity no prophets!
Thank you for this confession that _The Times_ is your god.
Are you talking about the fashionable amalgam of transreligious psychology that takes the form of crystal healing, garden Buddhas, "energy", affirmations, and self-help mantras?
It's popular because it's simplistic, absent any real content, is disdainful of anything before its own modernistic evolution, is self-focussed, self-directed, self-absorbed, effortless, and unencumbered with much in the way of service, theology, reason, or externally oriented meaning. And totally minus any concept of struggle.
In short it is the perfect form of religiosity for anyone who is basically secular, but needs a utilitarian religious crutch sometimes - ironically exactly what the boring, rather trivial atheists sneer about "organised religion".
The kind of “spiritualism” that worships its own feelings. Amoral and narcissistic.
So last century and centuries before, plus next century too. It's a lot better than trying to live a "TV life".
@@peterwebb8732 A clear demonstration you do not understand “ spiritual enlightenment “
At the core it asks us to empty our minds, including feelings!
As for morals and ethics, they are innate values humanity hold, and it is the narcissist religion that corrupt those!