Good demo of the RTX and explanation of bounce. I use Cleveland wedges (PW-Lob). RTX6 (46/56) CBX4 (50) CBX F-F2 (60). The CBX F-F2 is a full face wedge, like you, most of my mishits are in the toe. I don’t understand why most wedges are not full face, all Irons for that matter. It just makes sense that the more surface hitting area you have the better the club will perform (results from a mishit). I can’t think of any shot in golf (long or short game) where hitting the ball out of the toe of the club has resulted in a better result due to the absence of groves. The weight saved from extending the groves could be used to enhance the centre-of-gravity and MOI that club manufacturers keep banging on about
![🔴 ฟุตบอลแชมป์กีฬา 7HD แชมเปียน คัพ 2024 [รอบรองชนะเลิศ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zPm8ClLVhoE/mqdefault.jpg)
Good demo of the RTX and explanation of bounce. I use Cleveland wedges (PW-Lob). RTX6 (46/56) CBX4 (50) CBX F-F2 (60). The CBX F-F2 is a full face wedge, like you, most of my mishits are in the toe. I don’t understand why most wedges are not full face, all Irons for that matter. It just makes sense that the more surface hitting area you have the better the club will perform (results from a mishit). I can’t think of any shot in golf (long or short game) where hitting the ball out of the toe of the club has resulted in a better result due to the absence of groves. The weight saved from extending the groves could be used to enhance the centre-of-gravity and MOI that club manufacturers keep banging on about
I just got these in 52,56,60..❤️ Them..game changer..it’s all about the short game baby..
Howell, how are these Clevelands up against the Mizubo S 23 wedges which have more forgivness on heel an toe hits? Thanks...
Still using Cleveland 588's, tried an RTX 3 but did not like the look of the face.