@@ahmedomar8552 Cool man! They have alot of potential... I never get into that whole "there's no replacement for displacement" way of looking at a vehicle.
Bruh…maximum expense for a muffler delete is 200$ ….from a v6 to a v8 it’s like 10k$.. I think it’s really smart investment if we are talking about sound… sometimes it can even sound better that a v8… just like my V6 ;)
I would feel embarrassed driving an American pony car that sounds like a Japanese rice burner the the v6 trim shouldn't exist if you cant afford the v8 then buy a 370z at least then the sound will match the car you're driving
Or just leave it stock, so it'll look cool but won't sound horrible. Actually, the Magnaflow Street series (the bigger oval case mufflers) don't sound too bad on these, very quiet.
@@AdmiralRustyShackleford That's fair for some people but it's not only the sound. You can look cool but you're gonna get gapped and look and sound like a fool driving it. The v6 option has actually been discontinued since 2017 you can only get the ecoboost 4 cylinder and the GT which btw is a 10000 dollar difference. Also the GT makes 150 more HP and 70 more foot pounds of torque than the base model 4 banger and sounds better too obviously.
@@Satsailor69 I agree, for me it's a V8 or nothing, but the Cyclone V6 makes as much power as the old 4.6, and it gets better mpg and it's lighter so it handles corners better, so it's easy to see why people like it, and it helps the Mustang sell as the vast majority are V6. The Ecoboost? It makes more power and is even lighter but it requires premium fuel to make that power, and sounds horrible, so I'm not a fan.
@@AdmiralRustyShackleford Not sure if you know this but he 4.6 was used in the GT up until the 2010 model which made 315 HP and 325 LB-FT. The latest cyclone v6 which is in the 2017 v6 Mustang made 300HP and 280 LB-FT. And as far as mpg there's a 2 mpg difference in both highway and city and my source for that was fueleconomy.gov a federal website so I'm not being biased here .
@@Satsailor69 First off, I don't trust anything from the government, not even the time. Second, the Cyclone in most year models made 305hp, and up until the '10 model, the 4.6 made 300hp. It made more torque but the extra weight of the engine negated that, an '11-'14 V6 is a hair more quick than an 05-09 GT. It's nothing to be ashamed of, the 4.6 was an aging engine and the Cyclone was fairly advanced.
I think the muffler delete sounded the best between these 3 Mustangs.
I agree with you.
Yeah, that pull sounded great.
Take a shot everytime he says... right der andddd right der! Lmao
I am now intoxicated
Thanks for sharing!
This kind of video really helps choosing between budget friendly exhaust options.
I mean, at least the Cyclone sounds better than the EcoBoost.
Eco boost sounds better this v6 sounds so bad
@@Goyxrd3 shitty 4 cylinder, best keep it quiet as a Honda
The 2012 sounded best. The x pipe makes it sound better IMO
The V6 Mustang is what I would buy that's for sure..... I know just how good it is.
how good is that?
@@ahmedomar8552 really good in my opinion.
@@lenwoodcruze3594 I own one so I’m just asking this for the ego boost
@@ahmedomar8552 Cool man! They have alot of potential... I never get into that whole "there's no replacement for displacement" way of looking at a vehicle.
@@lenwoodcruze3594 a lil forced induction and I'm taking out GT's. There's a replacement for displacement
should do one with the flow fx
Gotta go with the magnapack
Don't really care for any of them. If forced to pick I would say straight pipes. All of them sound better than the FecalBoost though.
I live in Tennessee where is this shop located? I need to get my bbk shorty headers installed
3560 Dickerson road Nashville TN 37207
Magnapacks!!
6:08 ha!!!
How much does a straight pipe cost ?
Not sure for just the straight pipe but when I straight piped and deleted my resonators on my 15 mustang it was 195 so it’s below that
Noice
Dude most people ain’t gonna race there car lmao calm down
Never straight pipe a v6 🤦🏾♂️
Why?
@@oscarmorales1621 do whatever you want it’s your car ..
I would have saved on the exhaust cost and got a V8 instead.
No one cares tbh
@@SirenS550 looks like you cared.
@@smartcookie3500 I didn’t realize that I had to care to give my 2 cents 😴 you folks are smart
Bruh…maximum expense for a muffler delete is 200$ ….from a v6 to a v8 it’s like 10k$.. I think it’s really smart investment if we are talking about sound… sometimes it can even sound better that a v8… just like my V6 ;)
There all v6 mustangs so they all sound terrible
I would feel embarrassed driving an American pony car that sounds like a Japanese rice burner the the v6 trim shouldn't exist if you cant afford the v8 then buy a 370z at least then the sound will match the car you're driving
Or just leave it stock, so it'll look cool but won't sound horrible. Actually, the Magnaflow Street series (the bigger oval case mufflers) don't sound too bad on these, very quiet.
@@AdmiralRustyShackleford That's fair for some people but it's not only the sound. You can look cool but you're gonna get gapped and look and sound like a fool driving it. The v6 option has actually been discontinued since 2017 you can only get the ecoboost 4 cylinder and the GT which btw is a 10000 dollar difference. Also the GT makes 150 more HP and 70 more foot pounds of torque than the base model 4 banger and sounds better too obviously.
@@Satsailor69 I agree, for me it's a V8 or nothing, but the Cyclone V6 makes as much power as the old 4.6, and it gets better mpg and it's lighter so it handles corners better, so it's easy to see why people like it, and it helps the Mustang sell as the vast majority are V6. The Ecoboost? It makes more power and is even lighter but it requires premium fuel to make that power, and sounds horrible, so I'm not a fan.
@@AdmiralRustyShackleford Not sure if you know this but he 4.6 was used in the GT up until the 2010 model which made 315 HP and 325 LB-FT. The latest cyclone v6 which is in the 2017 v6 Mustang made 300HP and 280 LB-FT. And as far as mpg there's a 2 mpg difference in both highway and city and my source for that was fueleconomy.gov a federal website so I'm not being biased here .
@@Satsailor69 First off, I don't trust anything from the government, not even the time. Second, the Cyclone in most year models made 305hp, and up until the '10 model, the 4.6 made 300hp. It made more torque but the extra weight of the engine negated that, an '11-'14 V6 is a hair more quick than an 05-09 GT. It's nothing to be ashamed of, the 4.6 was an aging engine and the Cyclone was fairly advanced.