Would love to see some BF 1 maps added into Portal, Fort Du Vaux and Arogonne Forest, perhaps a remastered Devastation from 5. Great back catalogue of maps to choose from and as you say seems like an easy win. Seems to be a shortage of those tighter and atmospheric maps that they did so well for a time.
I can see the scale they went for with 2042 and sometimes I think the scale and ambition of the maps and quality goes unappreciated. But then sometimes I think they went for scale over fun initially because there is nothing fun about getting shot from absolutely anywhere. Looks like they have tried to pull the maps tighter with the reworks but would be great to see a real urban map where angles are reduced and you can plan movement around the map better.
I think all maps need to be added to Custom Conquest. Currently only the small and medium sized are available but would love to see the large versions added as well. More classic maps are a must. I would love to see Metro make a return as well as Gulf of Oman.
Be good to see more maps. So many excellent ones to choose from! As you say, custom conquest really needs more map variations too. Should be pretty easy to do.
Hey bud, appreciate your videos 👍🏼. Agree with the content for sure. A fully customisable HUD is much needed too. That and having ALL maps available in custom conquest. And the addition of custom RUSH! Listen, I need to pick your brains about something in the rules editor. Can I do that here or can I contact you another way?
Absolutely. Agree totally. Not sure we will see custom rush sadly - I think they think thats covered already with the addition of MCOMS (you could make your own if you have the knowledge) but more maps/map layouts in custom conquest is definitely needed!. Send me a DM on Twitter if you have it...@battlefielddad 👍
Yeah that last point is a good one. I normally play with a few friends (on console) and if I don't remember to cycle the maps (on a browser) every time we play, we're stuck playing the same maps in the same sequence or going through a rather long-winded process to skip or cancel. I'm hoping they could implement an end of round "select next map" screen - before loading the next map - with either voting or admin decides.
Be good to see some work done on accessibility. Might be difficult in this iteration of BF but I'm hoping they will continue the portal idea through to the next game and work on what's missing. Be good to see something like that in this one but I guess it depends what the build is like behind the scenes to support it.
I am 100 % sure that portal will be in future battlefield games or all furture Battlefield games. I cant imagine, it wont be. I mean it makes sense to keep portal :) :D
I would love to see Seine Crossing for BF3 and/or Berlin from BF 1942 (I would vote Stalingrad, but that would need the Soviet faction, which isn't going to happen for 2042). XP should uncapped for far greater portal experiences, especially as we enter the second year of the game.
Agreed. I know they want it capped but it doesnt make much sense to me. Does anyone care if some folk exploit it? Some will but also some will prefer to do the grind for the achievement, and allowing them to get full XP will allow them to enjoy Portal and not worry about it.
@Battlefield Dad! Is it possible to decrease the TicketBleedAcceleration, when all objectives are captured? Best would be to set it on an absolute value. So that it will be slower.
Hi, sorry it took a while to get back. First, you can only tinker with ticket bleed acceleration through the logic editor but in the other modes that don't use the editor you can adjust the number of tickets removed per kill through the standard editor (I know thats not exactly what you asked but thought I'd mention it). It depends what you want to achieve in terms of the acceleration, which is difficult to be sure. However, you can totally disable ticket bleed acceleration using the block under gameplay. The block is enable ticket bleed acceleration. Create rule with the event ongamemodestarted In that event put - enableTicketBleedAcceleration False And that will stop it. It starts to get trickier if you want to use the logic editor to have different speeds of ticket loss or have fine control over it.
@@BattlefieldDad thank you very much for your response! The decrease of the acceleration would be important in competitive Matches on small CQ maps. In this game mode there is no possibility for ticket or acceleration adjustment. Best would be when it would work like in BFv or previous BFs. In BF2042 the acceleration ist much to fast on tripplecap. Maybe it's possible to manipulate it with "and" logic and numbers. I'll give it a try.
Hi Battlefield. The Navel maps of BF4 would be Nice. Question: Does the persistent server function work? I can't get my server to say up and running when I get out of the server using "leave game" button. Not using the "take down" button. Any thoughts? And no map editor and XP restrictions on custom servers is quite annoying. and BTW, I reached 1K subs before you (-;
@@lencac7952 I've had the same problem but usually if I play for a moment and then leave. I go back and check if it isn't there I'll do it again. Sometimes it takes more than once. ...and this is just double checking but you have the battle pass premium right?
Should have been there at the start as well. For a game with so much focus on squads, support has been very poor. I have a feeling that something might be coming for squads though. The squads must be able to be identified in the game and, although I cant be certain, a reference to squads has been added to the editor...lets see.
@@BattlefieldDad I play the BF series since the start and they come up with worse and worse games every time...then the community needs to flame long enough to make them do stuff.,...
For the XP, it should be simple. Either just don't allow xp when there are bots in the server OR, don't give xp on bots killed... Map Editor? On paper, sounds fun, even something as 'basic ' like the FarCry games have. If you don't know, look up some videos of it. You could even make maps on consoles. In practice on the other hand....I think it would be a mixed bag. I am sure we could get some wicked maps. As for maps added to Portal. Sharki Penensula would be good or Assault on Karkand would be cool as well. Any map from BF3 and the DLCs would be golden. What I would like to see. Being able to have the other eras being able to spawn with 2042 era stuff and being able to mix and match era stuff. From the web editor....or is it the rule editor, whichever is the simple easier one...lol. Would like to be able to tweak the setting and have it as a HC server or a hybrid server...without effecting XP. I would also like to see but it is far too late now, would be have the weapons and gadgets locked and actually have to unlock those. 1. It would have just been better 'imo ' is if everything in Portal wasn't automatically unlocked...that wasn't 2042 era stuff. 2. If done correctly and have it where you have to play each eras to unlock their stuff, it would have more replayability, especially for those conpletionists out there that want to unlock everything, even if you never use x guns or gadgets. Maybe add something special for those who would have unlocked everything. Like an achievement unlock and some sort of badge or special skin that was dedicated to those eras. Oh, I know. For each class you rank up and max out, you unlock a skin for that classes 2042 era counterpart. The skin would make whatever specialist LOOK like that eras class soldier. So, say you maxed out BF3s engineer, then you get a special skin that applies to only engineer specialists that makes them look like the BF3s engineer class. Depending on which side you play, it will look like the U.S. or Russias engineer class. Mind you, I say like but not exactly. It would still be the specialists BUT they would be wearing the uniforms and gear of that class. EDIT: Would like to see a return to a honest to goodness rent a server. Like in BF1-3. Not tied to a battle pass but just give them money each month of 3 months or a year and your server/experience stays up, permanently. Would also like to see better ways on dealing with team killing. Unless they updated something, playing HC ' especially using the specialists ' is more then a bit dicey....but no real way to punish someone who is obviously just team killing, constantly. Also, idk if they could do it so late in the game BUT I would prefer being able to make changes to my server IN GAME and not have to go to a website to do it..at least for the easier one that is just toggling on and off options and sliders, everything the controller can do.. I really don't know why they did it like that neither. It is really what annoys me about Bf3 on PC. Sure, they get 64 players while the console only got 32 but damn, creating a server, finding a server and getting into an actual match is just SO MUCH easier on consoles, because everything was done in game ' not in a match but just running the game '
Excellent reply! Wont go through everything but: 1. Map editor - Im pretty sure we will get a ton of poor quality maps. Its usually the case where there is a map editor. But we've seen some cool inventive stuff done as well and managed correctly I think we'd see some excellent stuff too. Future level designers are out there! 2. Rent a server - yes please. And I know everyone seems to want stuff for free but if it was done well, with a good set of tools, it would be a good source of revenue that people would be happy to pay for. 3. I think that having only the web editor is massively holding back the number of servers available. Be good to have a basic set of settings in game like weve seen on console in other battlefields. I end up setting up basic servers for people I play with because they are either confused by it or just dont have access to their computer when they are playing. These are folk who used to set up servers so it isnt like they cant. Anyway - great stuff. Thanks
I agree, although it is possible to create your own version now they have added MCOMS to the logic editor. Problem is for those unfamiliar with the editor or who are finding it difficult its not easy.
I will like to see battlefield 1942 battle of stalingrad & guadalcanal. I think it will be awesome, and that means we will get two faction more to 1942 Soviets & Japan. I just hope it will happen :) :D
Be nice ti see more additions to the portal mode in terms of maps and teams. Not looking likely but you never know as we move into life after season 5 and the final map rework being released.
Just an overall QoL pass on the Portal browser would go a long way imo. The fact that the PC browser has the auto-slide with mouse as if we were playing with a controller is horrendous. I love Portal but I just don't want to launch the browser each time I remember how bad it is. The community managers should take 30mn of their day to ban the XP servers. The only well thought-out idea in the people votes list is the "Gamemodes lists", this is what I mean with Browser QoL. Just a more engaging and logical user experience with the Browser. The other people suggestions are unrealistic or obvious (more maps).
@@Grubilman I mean, from DICE PoV the whole point of the battlepass is to generate FOMO so people buy shortcuts. Also, T1 and achievements would lose all interest if you allow full XP against bots / with logic editor. Achievements need an even playing ground to matter. But in the end you're right, from a player PoV, I really could not care less. It's just the fact that these servers are cluttering the browser that annoys me, nothing else. The only thing I care about is the gameplay, not artificial grinds.
To be honest decent maps in the main game would be nice and especially a close quarters map or 2. Metro, Locker would be a great addition to Portal.(Portal is the only thing keeping 2042 alive because of the maps) I like FFA and Gunmaster but cannot create a full XP game unless it is in a bigger map, Yet I see some people putting up games on small maps with full XP. If people want to farm let them, it does not give any advantage.
I don't think Dice cares for progression or fairness, rather, they like the fact people must play longer to progress artificially inflating the player count
Love to see more maps: Metro, any BF1 maps, Operation Locker... Would also love a map editor, but if not maybe more objects that can be manipulated in portal like containers or fortifications that could be placed via logic editor.
Yep, agreed. I dont think we will see a map editor but if we could place more things using the logic editor we could still do some interesting things. We know it's definitely possible.
Would love to see some BF 1 maps added into Portal, Fort Du Vaux and Arogonne Forest, perhaps a remastered Devastation from 5. Great back catalogue of maps to choose from and as you say seems like an easy win. Seems to be a shortage of those tighter and atmospheric maps that they did so well for a time.
I can see the scale they went for with 2042 and sometimes I think the scale and ambition of the maps and quality goes unappreciated. But then sometimes I think they went for scale over fun initially because there is nothing fun about getting shot from absolutely anywhere. Looks like they have tried to pull the maps tighter with the reworks but would be great to see a real urban map where angles are reduced and you can plan movement around the map better.
I think all maps need to be added to Custom Conquest. Currently only the small and medium sized are available but would love to see the large versions added as well.
More classic maps are a must. I would love to see Metro make a return as well as Gulf of Oman.
Be good to see more maps. So many excellent ones to choose from! As you say, custom conquest really needs more map variations too. Should be pretty easy to do.
I still like to have the "breakthrough" mode in the portal, but DICE is not sure whether it will be added. Obviously, many people need it
Yep, Breakthrough being added would be a huge bonus. Not looking likely at the moment but you never know.
Hey man your two away from the 1000 subscribers!!!! I'm getting you your last two congrats my man!!!
...and I'm there. Thank you!!!!!!!
Hey bud, appreciate your videos 👍🏼. Agree with the content for sure. A fully customisable HUD is much needed too. That and having ALL maps available in custom conquest. And the addition of custom RUSH! Listen, I need to pick your brains about something in the rules editor. Can I do that here or can I contact you another way?
Absolutely. Agree totally. Not sure we will see custom rush sadly - I think they think thats covered already with the addition of MCOMS (you could make your own if you have the knowledge) but more maps/map layouts in custom conquest is definitely needed!.
Send me a DM on Twitter if you have it...@battlefielddad
👍
I like the idea of liking servers/rating 1-5 system
Map - metro from BF4 and Maps from CQ BF3 Zimba tower ;)
I just want Operation Locker so I can play 24/7 servers all day and night like back in the glorious BF4 days... 🤣😍
Probably never see it but if we do, I'll be there! Of course you can still play BF4...
Yeah that last point is a good one. I normally play with a few friends (on console) and if I don't remember to cycle the maps (on a browser) every time we play, we're stuck playing the same maps in the same sequence or going through a rather long-winded process to skip or cancel. I'm hoping they could implement an end of round "select next map" screen - before loading the next map - with either voting or admin decides.
Be good to see some work done on accessibility. Might be difficult in this iteration of BF but I'm hoping they will continue the portal idea through to the next game and work on what's missing.
Be good to see something like that in this one but I guess it depends what the build is like behind the scenes to support it.
I hope Portal is included in future iterations of Battlefeild... I love creating experiences!
I'll be disappointed if it isnt, especially given how far its come in this one.
I am 100 % sure that portal will be in future battlefield games or all furture Battlefield games. I cant imagine, it wont be. I mean it makes sense to keep portal :) :D
More weapons too :) especially from bc2 and bf3
I would love to see Seine Crossing for BF3 and/or Berlin from BF 1942 (I would vote Stalingrad, but that would need the Soviet faction, which isn't going to happen for 2042). XP should uncapped for far greater portal experiences, especially as we enter the second year of the game.
Agreed. I know they want it capped but it doesnt make much sense to me. Does anyone care if some folk exploit it? Some will but also some will prefer to do the grind for the achievement, and allowing them to get full XP will allow them to enjoy Portal and not worry about it.
Yes I was also thinking about Seine Crossing
@Battlefield Dad! Is it possible to decrease the TicketBleedAcceleration, when all objectives are captured? Best would be to set it on an absolute value. So that it will be slower.
Hi, sorry it took a while to get back. First, you can only tinker with ticket bleed acceleration through the logic editor but in the other modes that don't use the editor you can adjust the number of tickets removed per kill through the standard editor (I know thats not exactly what you asked but thought I'd mention it).
It depends what you want to achieve in terms of the acceleration, which is difficult to be sure.
However, you can totally disable ticket bleed acceleration using the block under gameplay.
The block is enable ticket bleed acceleration.
Create rule with the event ongamemodestarted
In that event put - enableTicketBleedAcceleration False
And that will stop it. It starts to get trickier if you want to use the logic editor to have different speeds of ticket loss or have fine control over it.
@@BattlefieldDad thank you very much for your response! The decrease of the acceleration would be important in competitive Matches on small CQ maps. In this game mode there is no possibility for ticket or acceleration adjustment. Best would be when it would work like in BFv or previous BFs. In BF2042 the acceleration ist much to fast on tripplecap. Maybe it's possible to manipulate it with "and" logic and numbers. I'll give it a try.
Hi Battlefield. The Navel maps of BF4 would be Nice. Question: Does the persistent server function work? I can't get my server to say up and running when I get out of the server using "leave game" button. Not using the "take down" button. Any thoughts? And no map editor and XP restrictions on custom servers is quite annoying. and BTW, I reached 1K subs before you (-;
Did you enable "persistent servers" in the game options? It's on the first tab at the bottom.
@@robert_5974 Hi Robert: Of course I did.
@@lencac7952 just checking
@@robert_5974 Any thoughts about why maybe?
@@lencac7952 I've had the same problem but usually if I play for a moment and then leave. I go back and check if it isn't there I'll do it again. Sometimes it takes more than once. ...and this is just double checking but you have the battle pass premium right?
Being able to join squads and change teams would be e no brainer to me.
Should have been there at the start as well. For a game with so much focus on squads, support has been very poor. I have a feeling that something might be coming for squads though. The squads must be able to be identified in the game and, although I cant be certain, a reference to squads has been added to the editor...lets see.
@@BattlefieldDad I play the BF series since the start and they come up with worse and worse games every time...then the community needs to flame long enough to make them do stuff.,...
For the XP, it should be simple. Either just don't allow xp when there are bots in the server OR, don't give xp on bots killed...
Map Editor? On paper, sounds fun, even something as 'basic ' like the FarCry games have. If you don't know, look up some videos of it. You could even make maps on consoles.
In practice on the other hand....I think it would be a mixed bag. I am sure we could get some wicked maps.
As for maps added to Portal. Sharki Penensula would be good or Assault on Karkand would be cool as well.
Any map from BF3 and the DLCs would be golden.
What I would like to see. Being able to have the other eras being able to spawn with 2042 era stuff and being able to mix and match era stuff. From the web editor....or is it the rule editor, whichever is the simple easier one...lol.
Would like to be able to tweak the setting and have it as a HC server or a hybrid server...without effecting XP.
I would also like to see but it is far too late now, would be have the weapons and gadgets locked and actually have to unlock those.
1. It would have just been better 'imo ' is if everything in Portal wasn't automatically unlocked...that wasn't 2042 era stuff.
2. If done correctly and have it where you have to play each eras to unlock their stuff, it would have more replayability, especially for those conpletionists out there that want to unlock everything, even if you never use x guns or gadgets. Maybe add something special for those who would have unlocked everything. Like an achievement unlock and some sort of badge or special skin that was dedicated to those eras.
Oh, I know. For each class you rank up and max out, you unlock a skin for that classes 2042 era counterpart. The skin would make whatever specialist LOOK like that eras class soldier.
So, say you maxed out BF3s engineer, then you get a special skin that applies to only engineer specialists that makes them look like the BF3s engineer class. Depending on which side you play, it will look like the U.S. or Russias engineer class.
Mind you, I say like but not exactly. It would still be the specialists BUT they would be wearing the uniforms and gear of that class.
EDIT: Would like to see a return to a honest to goodness rent a server. Like in BF1-3.
Not tied to a battle pass but just give them money each month of 3 months or a year and your server/experience stays up, permanently.
Would also like to see better ways on dealing with team killing. Unless they updated something, playing HC ' especially using the specialists ' is more then a bit dicey....but no real way to punish someone who is obviously just team killing, constantly.
Also, idk if they could do it so late in the game BUT I would prefer being able to make changes to my server IN GAME and not have to go to a website to do it..at least for the easier one that is just toggling on and off options and sliders, everything the controller can do..
I really don't know why they did it like that neither. It is really what annoys me about Bf3 on PC. Sure, they get 64 players while the console only got 32 but damn, creating a server, finding a server and getting into an actual match is just SO MUCH easier on consoles, because everything was done in game ' not in a match but just running the game '
Excellent reply! Wont go through everything but:
1. Map editor - Im pretty sure we will get a ton of poor quality maps. Its usually the case where there is a map editor. But we've seen some cool inventive stuff done as well and managed correctly I think we'd see some excellent stuff too. Future level designers are out there!
2. Rent a server - yes please. And I know everyone seems to want stuff for free but if it was done well, with a good set of tools, it would be a good source of revenue that people would be happy to pay for.
3. I think that having only the web editor is massively holding back the number of servers available. Be good to have a basic set of settings in game like weve seen on console in other battlefields. I end up setting up basic servers for people I play with because they are either confused by it or just dont have access to their computer when they are playing. These are folk who used to set up servers so it isnt like they cant.
Anyway - great stuff. Thanks
I want them to add Locker, or some other true close-quarters map.
Agreed. Definitely like to see locker. I'd like to see a good urban map too.
Customizable Rush mode needs to be a thing.
I agree, although it is possible to create your own version now they have added MCOMS to the logic editor. Problem is for those unfamiliar with the editor or who are finding it difficult its not easy.
I will like to see battlefield 1942 battle of stalingrad & guadalcanal. I think it will be awesome, and that means we will get two faction more to 1942 Soviets & Japan. I just hope it will happen :) :D
Be nice ti see more additions to the portal mode in terms of maps and teams. Not looking likely but you never know as we move into life after season 5 and the final map rework being released.
Warlord and map editors
How do you update the restriction level so I can save my experience
Hi, really sorry - not sure what you are having a problem with. I can see if I can help?
Just an overall QoL pass on the Portal browser would go a long way imo.
The fact that the PC browser has the auto-slide with mouse as if we were playing with a controller is horrendous.
I love Portal but I just don't want to launch the browser each time I remember how bad it is.
The community managers should take 30mn of their day to ban the XP servers.
The only well thought-out idea in the people votes list is the "Gamemodes lists", this is what I mean with Browser QoL. Just a more engaging and logical user experience with the Browser.
The other people suggestions are unrealistic or obvious (more maps).
@@Grubilman I mean, from DICE PoV the whole point of the battlepass is to generate FOMO so people buy shortcuts.
Also, T1 and achievements would lose all interest if you allow full XP against bots / with logic editor. Achievements need an even playing ground to matter.
But in the end you're right, from a player PoV, I really could not care less. It's just the fact that these servers are cluttering the browser that annoys me, nothing else. The only thing I care about is the gameplay, not artificial grinds.
To be honest decent maps in the main game would be nice and especially a close quarters map or 2.
Metro, Locker would be a great addition to Portal.(Portal is the only thing keeping 2042 alive because of the maps)
I like FFA and Gunmaster but cannot create a full XP game unless it is in a bigger map, Yet I see some people putting up games on small maps with full XP.
If people want to farm let them, it does not give any advantage.
I don't think Dice cares for progression or fairness, rather, they like the fact people must play longer to progress artificially inflating the player count
XP is really just about encouraging people to play for longer as you say. Its all about giving people a regular fix.
Love to see more maps: Metro, any BF1 maps, Operation Locker... Would also love a map editor, but if not maybe more objects that can be manipulated in portal like containers or fortifications that could be placed via logic editor.
Yep, agreed. I dont think we will see a map editor but if we could place more things using the logic editor we could still do some interesting things. We know it's definitely possible.
@@BattlefieldDad yep, definitely possible like MCOMs.
What would be amazing is somehow making more than 2 factions in a game.
It would be amazing if they laid out the maps like in Halo Forge. Imagine how much easier so many ideas could be executed.
It's something a lot of us have been asking for. Truth is we wont see anything like this in this version of the game, but maybe in time??
When did dice ever say they would add maps to portal? 😂 was never and is never going to happen.
Your right, Dice didnt promise anything with regard to maps, in Portal or the main game. One can live in hope though 😀
I would like to see Metro added.
Me too!