To Grade or Not to Grade: Estimating What A Card Will Grade and If It Makes Financial Sense

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2024
  • BASEBALL CARD COLLECTOR INVESTOR DEALER (in that order)
    Chris Sewall here.
    If you have a collection you would be interested in selling me, send me an email at: sewallsportscards@gmail.com
    ============================================================
    If you really enjoy my content, you're welcome to support me and my channel with a donation via PayPal.
    Link to PayPal donation: paypal.me/Chri....
    ============================================================
    YOU CAN CHECK OUT SOME OF MY CARDS FOR SALE:
    My COMC account: www.comc.com/U....
    My eBay store: www.ebay.com/u...
    ============================================================
    You can also support the channel but checking out some of our quality affiliates:
    Card Hedge: www.cardhedger...
    ============================================================
    CHANNEL SCHEDULE (all videos post 9:00am EST):
    MONDAY: Miscellaneous (Stories, Hobby News, etc)
    WEDNESDAY: High Rollers
    THURSDAY: Regular Rollers
    SATURDAY: Miscellaneous (Reveals, Lists, etc)
    =============================================================
    baseball cards, football cards, basketball cards, hockey cards, soccer cards, t206 Honus Wagner, 1952 topps mickey mantle, 1948 Leaf Jackie Robinson, 1933 goudey babe ruth, 1989 upper deck Ken Griffey Jr, 1993 SP Derek Jeter, 1981 Topps Joe Montana, 2017 Patrick Mahomes, 1996 Topps Chrome refractor Kobe Bryant, 1986 fleer michael jordan RC, 2003 exquisite, 2003 topps chrome gold refractor LeBron James, 2000 Tom Brady, 2017 Patrick Mahomes, Mike Trout, Steph Curry, Lionel Messi, National Treasures, 2012 panini prizm, silver prizm, panini flawless, ebay, PSA, Beckett, BGS, SGC, BVG, GEM MINT 10, PRISTINE 10, HGA, CSG, GMA, Goldin auction, Heritage auction, Pwcc, probstein123, COMC, starstock, card ladder, bowman chrome xfractor, Rookie card, rookie patch autograph, RPA, donruss optic holo

ความคิดเห็น • 133

  • @walterdudedonny
    @walterdudedonny ปีที่แล้ว +43

    Maybe it's just me, but I like it better when Chris gets higher grades from PSA than lower grades.

    • @bonerang888
      @bonerang888 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      It feels good to see a good guy win.

    • @samhill93
      @samhill93 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Nice lol, I chuckled pretty good at this one.

  • @scottvaughn9
    @scottvaughn9 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Chris, this video is so good from an educational perspective. Reiterating the importance of putting a more objective, close eye on the condition of the card is an invaluable lesson. We all love the hobby and can have a tendency of falling in love with the cards we get, looking at them through rose colored glasses at times. Before each submission, I do a final screen, going over each card, pretending I'm the strictest grader in the world with an absolutely ruthless eye. Same as you, I set range predictions, but often lean to the stricter side - more to just mentally prepare myself. And unless I feel I can hit a certain threshold of at least a ~$30 profit, I'll remove it from the pile (and either wait longer or sell raw). The only exception to this are PC cards or collector-driven cards that I simply want authenticated and protected, which is rare, but happens every so often.

    • @richardbianco9674
      @richardbianco9674 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This right here. I'll add studying the market. If a card is coming down or has been, the added wait might determine that grading at that moment is not a good move.

  • @Akho21570
    @Akho21570 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You also need to take into consideration, taxes and fees plus shipping and receiving fees from grading companies.

  • @moe4188
    @moe4188 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Hey Chris it’s matt in legal. I’ve talked to the team and we’ve decided we’re going to do a docuseries on all aspects of your business and how you operate. See you tomorrow at 6am!

  • @chrisratcliff6306
    @chrisratcliff6306 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thank you for answering my question in this video..lol

  • @dancalmpeaceful3903
    @dancalmpeaceful3903 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Shit and damn...with all DUE respect this MAY be the most IMPORTANT VID YOU'VE ever DID! Extremely enlightning.....and a bit alarming. One of the best you've EVER done. Love the intense analysis...

    • @thomascourt4935
      @thomascourt4935 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      "Do you really think I oughta swear?" "Yes, George... "

  • @DansVintageBaseballPC
    @DansVintageBaseballPC ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Your wisdom and personal experiences have helped me so much in making these kinds of decisions. I'm not sure if you quite realize how much of a human asset you are to the hobby. So, thanks!

  • @CircleMaster5000
    @CircleMaster5000 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for making this video. Very good simple system for deciding to grade or not, as someone pulling out my old baseball cards from child hood and trying to figure out if they are worth anything (or not)!

  • @JohnMiller-jj9kx
    @JohnMiller-jj9kx ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Another great instruction video for the DIY guys. I typically buy graded cards, but have a ton of quality raw that I need to give a shot with grading. I have sent off about 50 cards overall, but my last submission of vintage in 2020 was a blowout. Cards I thought would be 7-8s ended up being 4-5s. I sort of quit at that point, but should give it another go. Thanks a bunch Chris!

  • @Kstyleselect
    @Kstyleselect ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I don’t comment very much, but I watch all of your videos. I appreciate videos like this. Love your stuff.

  • @RogueDemagogue
    @RogueDemagogue ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I wouldn't use PSA to see if a card is centered right that has a lack of centering points, I would use BGS and look at the centering grades.

  • @kevinheckeler
    @kevinheckeler ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dilemma for me has been WHEN to grade. For the past couple years, since coming back into the hobby, I've been slowly accumulating some grading worthy raw cards for my PC. Initially I held off because of the pricing and wait times, then the prices fell but turnaround was still slow, and then the pricing/turnaround wars started. I have a lot of sub $500 cards to send in, and with SGC and BGS being so far behind in resale it's making it tough justifying sending to them and PSA's prices are just a tad high IMHO unless grading purely to flip. So those cards sit in holders where they seem to still be cards without needing someone to authenticate them.
    This situation has led me to buying more graded material overall, both in response to my procrastination and frugality, but also because buying fairly high value cards raw online has its risks.

  • @jeffreylanier222
    @jeffreylanier222 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ooo, I wish you lived in Cleveland. You would be my best friend in collecting cards 😂.

  • @jimmy_betmore
    @jimmy_betmore ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great video, Chris! You brought up two condition issues that I'm still not 100% clear on but, I'd like to get your input.
    1. Surface Condition: I was always under the impression that surface condition was solely the condition of the front and back surfaces of the card. I never thought that it would include print quality because, on the front, it's not technically the surface of the card due to the gloss varnish added after the color printing. If grading companies are combining actual surface condition (gloss, thumb prints, surface scratches, scuffs) and print defects (bad registration, fish eyes, comets, hickeys, peppering) are combined, I'm not a fan. In my opinion, surface and print defects should be separate.
    2. Centering on Cards Without Borders: The example you showed was perfect. The only issue is that the front has nothing to go by except the back. And we all know that back centering doesn't affect grading nearly as much as front centering. So, do you think any of the grading companies keep digital images of the cards they've seen and compare them to create an average? I understand that would weight center grading towards the early submitters. But, how else are they realistically going to grade centering?
    For what it's worth, I've worked in the printing industry for nearly 30 years and I'd say print defect is not a surface issue. It's a print defect. On top of that, I have no idea why anyone trusts PSA at this point considering they've gotten "stricter." So how legitimate are PSA 10's from 5 years ago?
    Sorry that I ended that on a little bit of a rant. But this hobby is drunk. Cards are selling for ridiculous money based on grades given by a company who has noticeably changed their standards.

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Great questions. I actually dont really know the answer to either. I know with Beckett, print defects are counted in the "surface" subgrade. With PSA not having subgrades, I don't know if they consider them separate.
      I also don't know how they determine centering on borderless cards. I would guess they are more or less winging it, but I am not sure. Its possible they have photo examples of each card.
      While I think its annoying that PSA has gotten stricter, I think it's in line with the evolution of the hobby getting stricter about grading in general. All of the grading companies have adjusted their scales or rules at times to account for the changing times.

  • @joet8168
    @joet8168 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Excellent breakdown on what goes into grading consideration.
    Thanks Chris!👍

  • @craigdaly6803
    @craigdaly6803 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The mark on the left side of his face is part of the card, I have the same card and discovered it on other views on ebay

  • @jeffreypeace2696
    @jeffreypeace2696 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Always love these episodes.

    • @colin24447
      @colin24447 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Agreed, although I love all of chris’ content 😂

  • @mattschwartz2657
    @mattschwartz2657 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Your content and tone are fantastic. Thanks so sharing your wisdom. Hope to see you at the National!

  • @jchcollins
    @jchcollins ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The purple squiggly to the left of Sandy's face below his ear on the '61 Koufax that you circled is on all of them.

  • @RogueDemagogue
    @RogueDemagogue ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Keep in mind, S/H fees, ins. grading fees, cost to send cards away that you sold, more S/H fees and ins fees. The buyer that might claim the card never came in the mail and he wants his money back and you're out the card. Last but not least, you pay taxes on the profit.

  • @chrisc4264
    @chrisc4264 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thanks for the breakdown Chris. To be honest, I'd like a breakdown using SGC, you know the company that's far better ethically and doesn't upcharge you. Sorry but PSA is such a sham. Sent me back a Gretzky claimed it was mini size and charged me for it. I compared it to other cards in the same pack and the cards measured out the same. I'm not going to support them until they change their greedy and flawed policies including upcharging. I just collect so resale value is not the be all end all to me.

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Your feelings on SGC/PSA are becoming more and more common. Although as a correction, SGC also will upcharge you (I have been upcharged by them multiple times), albeit only on vintage cards.

    • @chrisc4264
      @chrisc4264 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@collectorinvestordealer I was told by them via email although quite awhile ago that they don't do that. I stand corrected. Thank you. I'm still frustrated about being charged for a card that PSA didn't grade and again when I measured it was same as cards in the same exact pack. It was a rookie 79 Topps Gretzky btw. Just a very frustrating experience so I'm not much a fan of grading anymore for obvious reasons.

  • @Tydo35
    @Tydo35 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Chris great info you can never learn to much

  • @Intensity-qz2jx
    @Intensity-qz2jx ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video and awesome recommendations for getting a card graded. Now I know how to check centering on a borderless card. Thanks for that.

  • @elcubunda
    @elcubunda ปีที่แล้ว +5

    As a follow up to this video, it might be helpful to see how long it takes to sell these cards, for how much, and how your profit margin works. However, this is a suggestion and if it reveals too much of your business plan, it's understandable.
    Chris, I really enjoy your videos as it helped me get back into collecting. My own problem is do I stay active in selling as also buying or do I just keep building my personal collection? Thanks again!

  • @joeym2675
    @joeym2675 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Two Great Cards to show this video on! Vintage to Ultra modern! Like the Brady card that’s where I have the hardest time seeing the centering issues! I’ve still yet to grade a card of mine mainly because I’m a collector only but I have a certain box aside for potential grading and these videos have helped me go through them more than anything! So Thanks Chris! Also congrats on the Gem Brady!!!

  • @Lucas_D79
    @Lucas_D79 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    One of the older cards I have PSA GEM MT 10 is a 1981 topps Nolan Ryan and was shocked by how much it's worth.

  • @Uduplr
    @Uduplr ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Back Pre-70’s Cards were printed with spots all over….Some Years, Right out of the pack, or off the line, would never have had a 10.

  • @LeeCopus
    @LeeCopus ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think this type of in depth card analysis was a big time hit with your viewer's. Something we've never seen before. Maybe you should do a 4 or 5 card show like this every week.

  • @LeeCopus
    @LeeCopus ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chris you have helped me so much with your shows. Like America Roahouse of baseball cards.

  • @rascal3013
    @rascal3013 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    For borderless cards I look up graded examples of the cards centering to see if I can get an idea of what a 10 looks like. Look over a few if there are that many and even some 9's and 8's to see if centering is different from the card I have.

  • @DanTheCardMan2
    @DanTheCardMan2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Here I was about to go to bed, can’t miss this!

  • @buffussportscardcolleting777
    @buffussportscardcolleting777 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Chris, you always are quite informative on what you do with how you send stuff or what your grading or your purchasing.

  • @stevenwashington917
    @stevenwashington917 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love your videos as always bud, very practical and methodical approach to your grading process!

  • @Bryan45552
    @Bryan45552 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As someone who has a mostly ultra modern collection, I've noticed that it's just straight up gambling when attempting to grade cards, as a 9 often goes for the price of raw or even less than raw. Unless I'm overly confident, I really don't want to send cards in, so I haven't honestly unless I'm personally collecting it.

  • @markholmes6523
    @markholmes6523 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Entertaining and informative. Thanks for the content

  • @amihays7449
    @amihays7449 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I guess I thought u would talk about why u would grade.
    Great job for a seller to learn

  • @C.Baumann
    @C.Baumann ปีที่แล้ว

    I initially said 5 or 6 on Koufax, but that red dot in the corner and your analysis convinced me it was a 4. Glad it got the better grade for you!

  • @DG-lf5go
    @DG-lf5go ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Another great video. Truly enjoy your channel. Chris is so great for the hobby.

  • @fredstehling6551
    @fredstehling6551 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Car grating has helped destroy card collecting as a hobby. It is also Brought in bad people who commit crimes Who alter cards and make them fakes. It has made card companies rich with exorbitant fee schedules.

  • @Uduplr
    @Uduplr ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Grading Services for Cards And Coins is entirely too expensive for anyone to send them in now other than individuals who are rich

  • @ASMRPeople
    @ASMRPeople ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I found what you said about the koufax interesting. You imply that each little flaw takes points off. I have always looked at cards differently. For example the centering, surface & edges were all consistent with a grade of 6 or better. The corners however specifically those bottom corners were no better than a 5 thus the 5 grade made since. For the rare half grade, I was always under the assumption that if a card has particularly good characteristics besides one thing than it earns the half point. Thus in the koufax case probably if the surface was a little better it might have received the 5.5.

  • @tylerhasty9740
    @tylerhasty9740 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video Chris!

  • @brettcb471
    @brettcb471 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    PSA loves giving 6's to ultra-modern chrome cards lately with any surface imperfection whatsoever - I've had at least 4 come back in a 6 that were pack-fresh, cleaned with a microfiber cloth, and found nothing with a magnifying glass for surface scratches but nevertheless, EX-MT to PSA

  • @livinwithlt
    @livinwithlt ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video like always my friend 🤙🏽

  • @karenbruce8624
    @karenbruce8624 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    ALSO thank you for the video and the information with pictures LOL...I am newer to collecting and have searched for a video like this to actually seeeee what others just speak of. Thank you so much for that. I've read when a card is sent in to be graded, that I have rank the cards and choose what the value of the card would be? I don't understand at all what they want there? And is there a lesser fee (discount) if I send in many cards at one time? And how many can I send at one time? Lots of questions, but you REALLY cleared up so much in this video.

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว

      I am planning on doing a "how-to-submit-to-psa" video at some point soon which should answer all these questions

  • @Mikewhitaker408
    @Mikewhitaker408 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I always wondered on borderless cards if psa would actually take the time to use one of those centering utensils or just eyeball it my guess is the latter

  • @Enterslabman
    @Enterslabman ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I just don't understand how you could actually judge a card just based on a scan of it, especially the surface of the card. Unless you get real photos from the seller, at a certain angle, you can't tell. Scans can hide so many imperfections.

  • @romainvoeller
    @romainvoeller ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Loved the video; it's something I should watch each time I get ready to submit cards. One question; shouldn't the shipping, to and from, fees be included in the 'cost' of grading?

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว

      Good point, I sort of rounded up the grading fee to factor in shipping a little bit

  • @lindah3954
    @lindah3954 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A raw EX Koufax recently sold for $66 + $5.44 tax + $2.95 shipping on auction. Then $20 goes to PSA = $94.39 in total cost w/ grading.
    Then say you sell the PSA 5 Koufax on a BIN for $115. Then you get hit with $16.20 in eBay fees. My math says that you clear $4.40
    So it seems nearly impossible to make money grading raw vintage singles bought on eBay.

    • @RawGradeFlip
      @RawGradeFlip ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm going to guess Chris didn't pick this card up on eBay. From all his past videos he buys a lot of lots and usually at a 40-60% comps. He showed the Raw price to use as a starting point if it was worth getting graded. But correct in that you really need to factor your cost of goods in if you are just doing individual cards verse getting your cards in bulk.

    • @lindah3954
      @lindah3954 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RawGradeFlip Yeah, I hear you. I would love to pick up quality raw mid grade stuff like that at 60% of eBay completed.

  • @jude999
    @jude999 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Get them graded if you want to get them graded.

  • @artistbrindle
    @artistbrindle ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this, very helpful

  • @scotthull2141
    @scotthull2141 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    thnx, well explained

  • @westleypowell115
    @westleypowell115 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nice

  • @pedrocirino5695
    @pedrocirino5695 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very useful info as always!

  • @guppybeast6
    @guppybeast6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    eBay value on cards is a mess to me . I think I have something. Then I see them selling for a 1$ and then 10,000 for the card . No clue how do I sort past that

  • @librajustice457
    @librajustice457 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you. New at this.

  • @spaceviking4966
    @spaceviking4966 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good info. Thanks Chris

  • @thehighlanders607
    @thehighlanders607 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good show, thanks for the vid!

  • @mememaker9146
    @mememaker9146 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good process.

  • @pat-a-rattat8094
    @pat-a-rattat8094 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    That Brady is not a silver version I believe just the base version

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The "silver" are technically called "prizm". On the PSA label, the word "prizm" appears twice which means it is the "silver".

  • @danielbracco9997
    @danielbracco9997 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do you ever look at the Pop report to decide to send in a card or not? What was the name of that site that you used to check recent sales? Thanks for another great video.

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว

      I definitely look at the pop report quite often when deciding! The website I use is vintagecardprices.com

  • @Janet_Airlines802
    @Janet_Airlines802 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    PSA changing their grading standards is a disappointment. So what are 10's from years past, not really 10's? Are cards with 9's really 10's? The only good thing about it, is maybe finding 9's and resubmitting them.

  • @old-schoolrookiecollector1667
    @old-schoolrookiecollector1667 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A++ video very helpful Chris

  • @matthewessmann2429
    @matthewessmann2429 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great informational video. However I think one important fact you left when deciding is what do you have into that card? How much did you pay for it? Bc let’s say you paid $50 for that silver Brady. And it comes back a 8 or 9. Probably not worth grading it

  • @thomascourt4935
    @thomascourt4935 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    When you get the 10 from PSA, do you do a little fist pump? Or do you keep the Spock-like persona: "A 10 was indeed within my range of expected outcomes."?

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      If I am alone, I jump up and down, fist bumping and screaming. If I am in the presence of others, I calmly say "I am pleased with the results as the 10 was indeed within my expected range."

  • @christacket1809
    @christacket1809 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello this was a excellent video for me. I have been collecting and was left hundreds of cards for years I want to start selling all them. This helped show me the process. My only question is psa a great way to have your cards graded. And do you have there info. Thank you very much. I have cards of every sport starting in the 1960s to the present I even have lots of Nascar. Also if you know of anyone who would be interested in a huge bulk sale that would be great also.

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว

      If you are interested in selling a collection, I am always buying. You can email me at sewallsportscards@gmail.com.
      The major grading companies are:
      psacard.com
      gosgc.com
      beckett.com

  • @fredstehling6551
    @fredstehling6551 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anybody who has been around the hobby for any length of time knows within 2 grades what a card condition. Is? It doesn't take a 3rd party to give their opinion.

  • @benschroeder4036
    @benschroeder4036 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do you factor in shipping to PSA as well? Or just assume you'll pass that on in shipping fees to the consumer when you sell it after grading?

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว

      I definitely factor in shipping to PSA, and in theory other little costs as well.

  • @wesleyhodge9457
    @wesleyhodge9457 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video Chris and I appreciate the background and your thought process in what goes into deciding on whether to grade or not. Do you have a cutoff on what makes sense financially to grade a card? I’ve never really done the numbers on stuff I’ve sent in so I was just curious.

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว

      I dont really have a cutoff. Depends card by card. I am generally happy if I break even on the downside and make profit on the upside.

  • @spic0li
    @spic0li ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Always have to figure out how much you have into the actual card itself. Like with the Koufax did you buy at a single card price at a show or was it a bonus card found in a bulk lot purchase etc... Be nice to hear some true testimonials from a former or current PSA grader. Auction final prices versus BINs is usually about a 20% variance in final sales price.

    • @drew8703
      @drew8703 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why do you have to figure out how much you have into the card? You have the card and all that matters is how much the card can be sold for.

    • @spic0li
      @spic0li ปีที่แล้ว

      @@drew8703 what???? How does that not factor into it when you have grading & shipping/ insurance fees versus whatever grade you think the card may achieve divided by its average selling value.

    • @kenrogers1948
      @kenrogers1948 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@spic0li I went a round or two with Chris on that a while back... I agree that what you have into a card(what you purchased it for) factors into the equation if only because selling is always optional... the other side of that argument is to say that Chris' exercise presumes that you are buying and selling cards only for profit or to fund your pc or something, and that makes sense, too...

    • @spic0li
      @spic0li ปีที่แล้ว

      @@kenrogers1948 i totally agree in your assessment when looking at it from both sides of the equation thank you for mentioning this as well.

  • @gabriellugo8843
    @gabriellugo8843 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey I met you at Chantilly show and was wondering are you still interested in the Frank Thomas mirror blue. Thanks.

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes I would still be interested! You can email me at sewallsportscards@gmail.com

  • @karenbruce8624
    @karenbruce8624 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    You mentioned you thought they would look at the card the way you do when they grade...I would have thought they use magnification? When I magnify my cards, they look rough around the edges when my eyes did not see it that way at all? So I have yet to grade a card, but would love to? What do you think?

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว

      I actually do not know PSA's process of grading although I would guess they do not use magnification

  • @rlsfrny
    @rlsfrny ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Really great info, Chris. As a collector, the answer to the grade or not grade question might be different. If I'm not looking to sell cards, do you think it still makes sense to grade? On the Brady coming back a 10, I think the answer is very clearly yes. I'd rather have a $300 Brady than a $60 Brady. But on the Koufax, why would it matter to me whether it's valued at $65 or $95 if I'm not selling it? Unless it presents nicer in the PSA holder. Thoughts?

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว

      I love your reasoning. Makes a lot of sense to me

    • @Mattymatty2000
      @Mattymatty2000 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The only reason to grade a card you aren't selling is, for me at least, to preserve it. A PSA holder is a safer way to keep the card than a one touch and once you get it graded, you lock in that grade. But for cards I don't plan on selling I'm often not in a rush to get them graded. Just wait until there's a price special, or you need to throw an extra card into an order to reach the threshold for a certain discount price.

  • @user-ol3xk7me9x
    @user-ol3xk7me9x ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Chris, do the grading companies offer some type of chain of custody when you submit a card for grading? How do you know that the card you send in is the graded card you get back? And not a switcheroo?

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You are putting your faith in these companies when you submit cards to them that they are not switching cards.

  • @dshevack1
    @dshevack1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Because I have a lot of cards from the late 70s through the 90s from sets to individual cards is there a good process to getting a good value for them?

  • @cjsocool3307
    @cjsocool3307 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I do like your videos !, I recently bought 2 Carlos Alvarez (Pro Tennis) RC's debating sending them to PSA for Grading. Both cards are in perfect condition. Do you think I should send them in?, Curious. Let me know

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว

      I would need to see the condition to advise whether to send them in or not.

    • @cjsocool3307
      @cjsocool3307 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@collectorinvestordealer how do I send the pic of card to you?

  • @Latinochino
    @Latinochino ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would like to think that this type of processes or thinking is going with everyones head when submitting to a grading company. My dumbass just submit cards that I want to see slabbed 🤣

  • @matthewelliott2213
    @matthewelliott2213 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey Chris, great episode. My question is what to grade when you have a set to sell. I'm looking at my 88-89 Fleer basketball set. The three Jordans are beautiful and should get 9's I'm my opinion. Same for the Rodman, Miller, and Pippen. 10's are in play and 8's are possible as the lowest imaginable. I was wanting to sell the set complete and want to represent the quality of the set with PSA grading some rookies and stars. Would you send the Jordans? All six? None? Thanks for the advice.

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว

      I would need to see the cards to really advise, but I think getting a few of the key cards graded makes alot of sense (whichever of the Jordans and key RCs look like solid 9s or 10 contenders).

  • @scottfournier4608
    @scottfournier4608 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great info Chris. Question for you: did you acquire these cards from a collection or did you buy them as singles? Also, do you consider Gem Rates at all to determine if they should be sent for grading? Thanks!

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Almost all cards I acquire are in large collections. I do look at Gem Rates sometimes before deciding, although not for these two particular cards.

  • @user-jw6bf9hl6c
    @user-jw6bf9hl6c ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a John Elway rc that has a bubble gum stains square on the back is the grade affected if so how much?

  • @Philly_Joe
    @Philly_Joe ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍

  • @pmn618
    @pmn618 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I do these calculations all the time, did you include shipping costs to and from PSA in your grading fee cost? Also, there is a time and effort element that should be part of the equation. That's why for me the 61 Koufax is not a no brainer, I would've subbed only if I felt it had a very good chance of a 6, but that's just me.....

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Great points. Yes, I factored in shippings costs to PSA.

    • @pmn618
      @pmn618 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@collectorinvestordealer Thanks for the reply!

  • @Al-ImprovEd2022
    @Al-ImprovEd2022 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Does Chris use Market Movers?

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I used to use market movers and found it to be quite good, but it was missing many cards and the sales only went back a year or so, so I stopped using it a year or two ago. I don't know if it is better updated now.

  • @deborawiliiams4864
    @deborawiliiams4864 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Question please, when you said specks on the front of the first card, were those specks after purchase or dye error specks which i thought that made it an error card and raised the value. Ty

    • @collectorinvestordealer
      @collectorinvestordealer  ปีที่แล้ว

      Those are specks that are probably printing flaws from the factory. Dye-error specks are considered factory misprints (not errors) and do not raise a card's value.

  • @rockcundiff1761
    @rockcundiff1761 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ranges are for weathermen

    • @walterdudedonny
      @walterdudedonny ปีที่แล้ว

      Where the deer and the antelope play.

  • @colin24447
    @colin24447 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I personally thought the range for the Koufax was between a 4 and a 5.5

  • @donaldwaters4615
    @donaldwaters4615 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    PSA does not grade fairly, you must pay for a high grade. I sent in a 1956 Duke Snyder with a small rip and creases. I sent in a 1956 Sandy Kofax in the same submission from the same set. The Kofax did not have any rips or creases. Soft corners and similar condition to the Duke S. Card besides the rip and creases. PSA gave the Kofax a 2 and the Duke a 3. The Kofax as a 2 is only worth a few hundred dollars as a 3 it's 1000, a 4 gets 2000 etc. PSA won't grade high unless you pay for it. Their fee schedule is based on the value of the graded card.

  • @luke5947
    @luke5947 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Grading is not always the answer .. True collector knows what they have 😂 just sayin

  • @tidetalkwithwebb5391
    @tidetalkwithwebb5391 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So basically you are telling me people are just buying labels. I'll stick to raw cards.