Genghis never attacked a country first, he attacked only for revenge. He attacked the chinese because they killed his relatives. He attacked the mid Asia because they insulted his emissary. But he did not attack India, when he easily could do that and win, why?
No bro, he was not avenger. He did all massacre for Power. He left India because he was bent more towards power than money because of his early harsh days of childhood. It's just that he was lesser than the least Evil only because he was a man of Principles. He always gave his opponents a chance to surrender. Also he never spared if he was insulted. Also he was against fanatic religious like Islam and Christianity,etc.. though he never loved any religion but may be left india because of some soft corner as it resembled his religion...
@@modgamer795 Allauddin Khilji was born way after Genghis Khan. Iltusmis was the sultan of the delhi at that time. He did not shelter Jalaluddin, that's why Genghis did not approach India. Also his religion had similarities with Hinduism, may be he had some affinity.
This may sound nuts.. but I’d like to go back in time and just observe these historical conquerors and wars. Just to see the war tactics and combat during that time.
I provide a similar sentiment, however, as a Persian individual myself, I would defect from my country and the Khwarazmian Empire without hesitation, regardless of my expertise.
Y Gui Nope. Did you hear him say "barbarian"? Did you know that Germanic conquerors used to be called barbarian even though western? Cut the nationalistic BS out.
Lol and most of what we know of Alexander is probably propaganda anyway. Not saying he didn't conquer across Middle East, but his portrayal of being this great guy is almost certainly Victor's propaganda lol
The empire wasn't about Genghis Khan, or even his empire. It was about his genes. GK was only the vehicle for their reproduction. He is long dead. His empire is long dead but his genes live on.
Alexander never destroyed a city after city,enslaving/murdering entire population of said cities,he never used biological warfare,and most important...he never besieged a city resulting in around a million of civilian deaths.
#8, I've it heard different..the way I've heard it was, yes, after Genghis' father was murdered, the clan broke apart,leaving him,his mother and siblings alone. they hunted to eat and whomever made the kill, no matter how small, it was divided between the whole family. well, they caught the half brother eating all of his kill,without sharing, and timogen killed him with his bow and arrow.. that's how I've read the story.. I may be incorrect, but I've read it that way in several different books by different authors...
+Brad Fitz I want to know this as well, cause I also heard it the way you said, where it was more of a justified kill( as justified as killing your half brother can be anyways)
+Brad Fitz I want to know this as well, cause I also heard it the way you said, where it was more of a justified kill( as justified as killing your half brother can be anyways)
TheHolycupcake ya, I've been waiting all day for a reply from our Mongolian friend, I'm genuinely interested in knowing what the people of Mongolia hold as truth....
The life story of Genghis Khan is the most inspiring ever. His father was killed by an other tribe when he was only nine years old. After that, the clan abandoned his family to live alone in the harsh cold of The Steppes. Temujin (Genghis) spent his childhood in hardships and slavery. He understood that only Power is survival. Luxury is just an illusion, and that it can end any moment, like it did after his father's death. His rise from a poor boy on a wasteland, to creating The World's Largest Empire is the most real and inspiring story ever told. He never sought war for plunder or wealth. He always retaliated as a last option. Just by analysing plain facts from his life, you can clearly tell that Genghis Khan had one of the strongest wills and principles. He is a role model for everyone
Don't forget after boiling alive to fling the corpses over besieged settlements, wait that was Kublah Khan but I can imagine Genghis Khan doing it too.
+purpleprinc3 That was pretty nice of them a free meal before the battle. Meat was hard to come by in Mongolia back in those days during the winter months from what I understand. Any meat would be a delicious treat 👲=🍖🍖🍖👌
Darren Barghest damn it must have been a nightmare to live in those days. What if you wanted to escape going to war for Khan or fight against him? How would you get away from that?
Check out the war crimes of America and Japan its insane just how much and how f**ked up it is (And they are rarely talked about in contrary to the german war crimes)
For number 8, you seem to be forgetting that at the time, there was very little food, and in order to stay alive, it had to be shared. However, his brother refused to share the food. Consequently, Temujin killed him. Whilst this may seem brutal now, it was likely that his family may not have survived if he hadn't done that.
Not only that but in their culture the step brother would have had marriage rights to his mother as he was the eldest of his fathers sons so he had rights to his wives automatically. Ghenghis likely couldn’t stomach that his older brother would be his stepdad too.
and today millions of Mongol people look up to him as a national hero. seriously how messed up should your world view be to admire such a lunatic. it's like if Germans had a status of A.H in all their cities today.
He was also known to be very generous unlike most khans. He favored methods that would ensure that most of his men would not die. And this was hundreds of years ago man Europe had worse torture methods then.
@@gwoahw he killed at least 30 million people when the world population was much smaller and mechanized warfare didn't exist. he is the closest thing to the concept of pure evil in human history. one of the reasons people don't hate him as much as Hitler is because history is written by Victors, he won and hitler lost. if Germany won world war two Hitler would not be hated as much as he is now.
@@gwoahw if i could travel back in time i would definitely kill these genocidal maniacs in their infancy , without breaking a sweat. i'm sure it would be easy. right!
8. Temujin's half brother was not sharing food and taking what they caught, he was killing them slowly, they had just been kicked out their clan, deserted and desolate, they were desperate. Temujin had to kill his half brother for his family to survive, in my opinion at least.
@@stuartharrison9944 Well he just did what every other country did before they attacked him. In a world where violence gets you at the top you gotta do what you gotta do. Every country did this. He was just the best at doing this. He did all of those things with his people in mind. He attacked China because he knew China would never let a unified country that close to its borders and would’ve attacked Mongolia anyways so he made the first move.
Patrick Flynn modest? He literally changed the earths environment and weather by killing over 50 milk people, essentially stopping the vast majority of of human activity in Asia. How on earth do you equate that with modesty
It's because we get our information about Genghis Khan (correctly written Chinggis Khaan) from a book called Secret History of The Mongols. It mostly talks about the good things he did like being loyalty, honor and mercifulness (sending missionaries before attacking) etc. Besides, no one except Mongolians can say 'our ancestor who started as a slave managed to conquer most of Eurasia'.
He is not comparable to hitler or stalin or people like that. Genghis Khan was a brutal conqueror for sure, but he was not an evil person in any way. He was quite caring and compassionate for those who were close and loyal to him, and he treated all the subjects in his empire fairly. Once you were incorporated into the mongol empire, you were given religious freedom, access to the largest economy in the world, and didn't have to worry about war because you were under mongol protection. It would have been comparable to living in the roman empire. At the end of the day the mongols probably had a positive effect on the world.
I’m sorry but you left out important information on number 9. The Russian princes killed Mongolian ambassadors who were seeking diplomacy! That’s why the mongols captured them and then put them under the floorboards of their gers.
WRONG! Your version of him killing his brother is inaccurate. His brother went hunting for food and was eating the food and not sharing it with the family. Genghis caught him doing so and killed him. They were hungry and the brother was hoarding the food before returning to camp. I'd say he had it coming.
@@gregormundell1058 Completely irrelevant, you aren't actually trying to say that killing your brother over eating food he should of shared was a necessary method of survival?
Business Yes, one less mouth to feed. In times like that one meal could be potentially life saving. The food his brother hoarded could very well have killed everyone else by proxy so he deserved what he got.
@@gregormundell1058 So by killing his brother does that make the food situation better, does it improve their chances of getting food in anyway ? One less mouth to feed? sounds like he was feeding himself. Your logic is non existent. I don't know but maybe he could threaten his brother or just take the food but killing a family member who at the very least can hunt accomplishes nothing.
Can I suggest that you do : top 10 most horrific facts about the UK collonial past... include opium distribution/ pushing, slavery and brutal exploration of the colonies... it would be fascinating. :)
Egyptian mamluks killed mongols messangers and wiped mongolians out of the middle east, without the mamluks who knows mayb they would have went to africa
Interesting on #4 with some claiming that Khan was tolerant with other religions. I noticed that Wikipedia has this in the Genghis Khan entry: "Genghis Khan was a tengrist, but was religiously tolerant and interested in learning philosophical and moral lessons from other religions. He consulted Buddhist monks, Muslims, Christian missionaries, and the Taoist monk Qiu Chuji.[29]"
You sir is the definition of an idiot. Genghis was the Hitler of medieval times. 10-15% of worlds population mostly civilians was mass slaughtered by your idol. That number is equivalent to over 1 billion human beings in todays world.
-He poured molten silver into greedy Shakhs who killed his merchants, not every single dude he saw -Did not spill noble blood because we believed that human soul is in their blood. For us being suffocated in cow leather and other executions were type of honor, it wasn't made to inspire fear. -Why are you always saying he was "Blood thirsty remorseless killer" -Killing was not habit, they had a choice, and the ones who refused died honorably defending their homes -Khan is like regional or tribal chief, in Mongolian Хан, and Khaan is the emperor in Mongolian Хаан -It's Chingis, Чингис in Mongolian, Russians brought up that wrong one Ghengis -Love how you slaughtered the name Zev, it's Зэв in Mongolian which means "Arrowhead", it was nickname given to him by the emperor himself, his real name is Зургаадай -That ally you mentioned was brutal even in our standards, dude boiled captured people in a big cauldron which was used to boil whole sheep and no he didn't eat them, it was kind of decimation which was aimed to affect enemy morale -There is evidence of all sorts of religious temple in the capital Kharkhorum, which the emperor himself ordered to be built, fact that he did not tolerate other religion is pure hogwash, he new if he messed with anyone's tradition the empire would not last long so he did not force nomadic food and tradition to anyone he conquered -It's not human shield, it's auxiliary unit, any smart general would not want to waste his men when you're on campaign for over 5 years -Mongolians do not worship "god", it's the will of the eternal sky to kill the opposing dudes I believe you just salted most of the fact to make him seem as "evil and brutal" leader. I did not meant to undermine your research, and since the story is written by the victors I do not believe the version I'm saying is 100% true. As a true scholar you and I should make the best out of both versions and carry on with out research. The video was certainly interesting as how the Europeans seen us in the past times. I believe the cunning tactic that aimed to make us seem brutal cold blooded killers certainly succeeded since this is how you people think we used to be like. Cheers mate
Thank you, that was a lot of interesting information. Exchanging information like that is a great thing. We’re still learning a lot that was buried in the history of the US, which is far younger and fresher. We should have no expectation that we’ve gotten everything correct from far older histories.
He wasnt cruel he usually only killed when when he was disrespected. Such as one time he sent a messenger to trade with a nearby empire and they beheaded his messenger and sent him the head. So he burnt down the city and diverted a river over his birthplace to leave no remnants of his existence. You dont go in a wolf den and hit the wolf then get pissed when it rips off your arm.
Pretty bold use of the word "fact" here guys. Just about everything we know of genghis was written by the Chinese, as the Mongols didn't have much of a written language. I've heard the opposite of several of your points, religious tolerance being a big one. That being said I enjoyed the video and hearing other theories.
Legally he couldnt be held responsible for all of those victims though because he was involved indirectly in most cases. The sentence would still be enormous of course.
It's really cool to go to. There's an observation deck that you can look out and have a great view of the steppes around. There's also a museum inside the bottom of the statue. If you get the chance to go to Mongolia it's worth a visit.
When Temujin was about to kill his brother he knew what temujin was going to do and accepted it with one last request. That temujin would protect his little brother
A love reading and watching stuff about genghis khan.. would love to visit mongolia one day during the festival.. I have been reading the conn iggulden conquer series about genghis khan if you like him a would recommend those books .. He is my favourite historical person.. all everyone wanted to do was take over the world lol
Genghis Khan allowed people to practice any religion they wanted in places he captured. He was actually very tolerant for his time. His beef with Jews and muslims was that they said certain food was unclean and this was against the great law of the mongols. They were free to practice their religion but were not allowed to tell people not to eat pork or anything like that. They could do it themselves though
Exactly, the information seems so baised and he should at least let people know the source of the information. I suggest everyone to watch the documentary on genghis khan by bbc this video has persued the great conqueror in a wrong way.
Norman Hampton I don't live in Mongolia I am studying abroad and I know a lot about my countries history. In Mongolia you do have internet in the big cities :-)
@@youtubedeletedmyaccountlma2263 rebelling under his rule surely wasnt smart, or resisting to him. But he still spared artist and many with a talent, Led them serve to him.
@@desselerant1806 Not really. When he come in, he massacred literally 80% of the population. He don't have reasons to do it, the army was defeated but the first thing he did is to massacre the population for easier control. Don't put today standard judging him
No it's in the way they are treated allowing religion in a large land empire is not revolutionary or unique. As said in the video jews and muslims were oppressed. The mongols burned russian orthodox churchs then the mongols didnt tax them and allowed the russians to practice christianity since the mongols couldnt do much. Theres little evidence to show the effect these religious individuals had on the mongols and mongol empire.
Hey Simon, I am from Kiev, where GENGHIS KHAN in 1237 (supposedly) lost half of his army (one half of the million) during the siege. Read many books and articles about it. However, according many historic scholars, that never happed. The thing is, it was logistically impossible to travel such large army across immense distance from Mongolia. Can you look into it and maybe do video?
It's really bad, possibly his worst movie. His "Genghis Kahn" "acting" was indistinguishable from his "American Cowboy" and I'm actually a fan. Of his movies.
I'm a Mongolian and sometimes people think that Mongols are brutal. Well we aren't actually. Ok actually I might be a little brutal to some people when they make me mad but whatever 😌😅
number 8-From what I read Genghis and his family were left for dead by their tribe after his father died.They were almost starving and his older brother would hunt and eat the food himself without sharing it with the other family members. That is the reason he was killed.
He was a great innovator and commander, also very normal and humane in terms of nomadic standards. In nomadic conquering tradition if you do not obey at first place, you usually get killed. The khan just killed who disobey or harm him / his subjects and he was an unrivaled conqueror so the numbers on statistics are big (we are talking about conquest of almost whole Asia that time, c'mon!).
Khan was brutal yes but this is a brutal age he simply had the biggest and best army and any other nation had what he had they would do the same thing we should also look at some of the good things he did creating the silk road tolerated all religions he reasoning for slaughtering a city is no different then the US's atom bombing killing some saved many more through their fear women were also treated very well there are several laws Khan created that made treating women like property illegal and women could inherit and administer land men were still dominant but it was a massive difference from europe were at this time women were chattel
He did have a good quality that most of the other great men of history cannot lay claim off. He never betrayed anyone, and was really loyal and go out of ways to help his friends. He tolerated his wife for carrying his enemy's child, he brought that child up as his first son, he fought an empire to avenge the unjust death of lowly soldiers who served under him. He got betrayed a lot but never betrayed anyone according to historical record as we know. The brother he killed was a person who refused to share food with other kids in the family and was generally being a bully.
Tolerance of religion was kinda volatile in the Mongol Empire. For example, when the Pope would call a crusade on your empire, would you not be a LITTLE cautious from your Christian subjects? Or when the Caliphate calls a Jihad on you, would you not be careful of your Muslim subjects?
There were a string of cities that were absolutely annihilated in the wake of Genghis Khan and his army's onslaught through the khwarezm: Samarkand, Merv, Urgench etc... All were massacred almost to the person. Merv was considered one of the weathliest and most prosperous cities of it's time. .
Two major things he got wrong. It wasn’t just an “enemy” who captured and burned his generals, it was actually Brother. Other thing wrong was he was tolerant in freedom of religion. Same as Xerexes.
Just a bit of background...The picture you used at 7:41 is of Sikh guru Arjun dev ji. He is considered a great martyr. The Mughals of India were trying to force Sikhs into Islam. The Sikhs refused and fought against Mughals. Sikhs fought against Mughals for centuries and prevailed. Sikhs finally established Sikh raj in 1800s. Guru Arjun dev ji was boiled to death in 1606 in the city of Lahore (ironically the city became Sikh capital 2 centuries later). I have read somewhere that Mughals were descended from Mongols.
+Hablayo pakistan became an independent nation in 1947 before that it was all India. The Sikhs established Sikh kingdom in 1800 under maharaja ranjit Singh. Lahore was the capital of Sikh kingdom.Ranjit Singh died in 1839, his sons and grandson tried to control the kingdom but due to inner conflict and betrayal by dogras the Sikhs lost the kingdom to British in 1849. Most of the Punjab (both punjabs Indian and Pakistani) was under Sikh kingdom. I am a Sikh and I like to read about Sikh history.
Khan knew how to get other tribes join him a lot of the time and when they refused he still won against most of them. What I Like is the Mongols where indifferent to what religion a person practiced.
Not Tamuuuujin. It's pronounced Timujin. He unified a country. He set laws and rules. He hated racism or classism. He looked upon a man by the courage and character a man had. Gaaadammit...modern world can learn something from this legend.
@@midare39 Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Vietnam, the Middle East, Somalia and the list goes on.... Oh pardon me, I guess this genocide is fine since your heroes are doing it for a worthy cause 🙄
"I'm the punishment of God, if you have not committed great sins God would not have inflicted a punishment such as me upon you." - Genghis Khan That's what he said regarding the number 2 fact. That's an epic quote right there.
Number four is demonstrably incorrect. Genghis Khan was generally tolerant of local religious practices so long as they didn't interfere with Mongolian rule. He had many generals that were of various different religions, and the practice of Christianity seemed to particularly appeal to Mongol sensibilities with many of them converting.
Well population wise is could be considered the largest empire. But in land mass the British empire beats it but quite a lot, plus it lasted considerably longer. Mongolian only lasted around 200 years, if even that.
This is barely accurate. Genghis Khan was certainly brutal but he was also very innovative. If you read Genghis Khan in the making of the modern world which I have and is considered to be the most accurate history of his life you'll find that a lot of this is not true. I'm not going to list everything but he was actually very tolerant of religions and cultures as long as they submitted to the fact that he was the supreme ruler. He protected holy men teachers women and children etc. So long is basically they said he was the boss. He initiated a world mail system and protected trade routes and merchants. He also did not care of your status when you were born everything was earned in his culture. Which basically means you could have no name when you were born and rise to The top in his system and being born of high status meant nothing. he also took care of the families of his soldiers if they were to die in battle forever. I could go on and on but there's a lot of misconceptions about the Mongols actually. Don't get me wrong they were extremely brutal at times but very unique and progressive in other ways as well.
@@RANDOM-pf1ve how about how he raped many women, how did that help the environment... Also the world had a way lower population back then so if someone decided to kill millions of people right now for the better of the environment, would it be worth it, and would that be a valid reason for brutality?🤔
To think that the Khawarmiyan empire might have survived if they have not killed the envoy. The Jin empire might have survived if they have not asked for tribute.
I know this is messed up, but can you imagine how crazy a video game about his life would be...
Nothing messed up about that bruv. Would definitely need a company with a lot of guts to actually make a game like that lol.
@@shaggystoner5235 I don’t see why they’d be afraid to, we got gta and war games lol .
Theres a great series of books! Starting with “Wolf of the plains” by Conn Iggulden
Meh
@@franciscomiguel4297 China probably wouldn't like it which is the problem. China no like? China no buy.
Closest human we've got to Thanos.
Thanos is inspired by Khan
Thanos is inspired by Khan
Zion Williamson?
Mao Zedong: Am I a joke to you?
Hayk Khachatryan yes
Genghis never attacked a country first, he attacked only for revenge.
He attacked the chinese because they killed his relatives.
He attacked the mid Asia because they insulted his emissary.
But he did not attack India, when he easily could do that and win, why?
Cause there was Allauddin Khilji in India
True. The historians have labelled him barbaric. But in reality he only took Revenge. He attacked only when he was pricked.
No bro, he was not avenger. He did all massacre for Power. He left India because he was bent more towards power than money because of his early harsh days of childhood.
It's just that he was lesser than the least Evil only because he was a man of Principles.
He always gave his opponents a chance to surrender. Also he never spared if he was insulted. Also he was against fanatic religious like Islam and Christianity,etc.. though he never loved any religion but may be left india because of some soft corner as it resembled his religion...
Sir I remember as have read he attacked India twice. First during Sultante and inflicted heavy damage. But he retracted due to inclement weather
@@modgamer795 Allauddin Khilji was born way after Genghis Khan.
Iltusmis was the sultan of the delhi at that time.
He did not shelter Jalaluddin, that's why Genghis did not approach India.
Also his religion had similarities with Hinduism, may be he had some affinity.
This may sound nuts.. but I’d like to go back in time and just observe these historical conquerors and wars. Just to see the war tactics and combat during that time.
True. My wish is also very same ;)
Only sounds cool in a superficial way. It will probably traumatize you, seeing the death and destruction and atrocities.
same here.
I would go back in time to nuke Genghis Khan and all his people.
I provide a similar sentiment, however, as a Persian individual myself, I would defect from my country and the Khwarazmian Empire without hesitation, regardless of my expertise.
Western historians on western conquerors like Alexander the Great: "Hero. Great man"
Western historians on eastern conquerors: "Barbarians!"
Why don't you move to Mongolia shithead?
Y Gui Nope. Did you hear him say "barbarian"? Did you know that Germanic conquerors used to be called barbarian even though western?
Cut the nationalistic BS out.
Lol and most of what we know of Alexander is probably propaganda anyway. Not saying he didn't conquer across Middle East, but his portrayal of being this great guy is almost certainly Victor's propaganda lol
The empire wasn't about Genghis Khan, or even his empire. It was about his genes. GK was only the vehicle for their reproduction. He is long dead. His empire is long dead but his genes live on.
Alexander never destroyed a city after city,enslaving/murdering entire population of said cities,he never used biological warfare,and most important...he never besieged a city resulting in around a million of civilian deaths.
#8, I've it heard different..the way I've heard it was, yes, after Genghis' father was murdered, the clan broke apart,leaving him,his mother and siblings alone. they hunted to eat and whomever made the kill, no matter how small, it was divided between the whole family. well, they caught the half brother eating all of his kill,without sharing, and timogen killed him with his bow and arrow.. that's how I've read the story.. I may be incorrect, but I've read it that way in several different books by different authors...
Brad Fitz that is OUR version (I am Mongolian)
Doni Bathuu which,is correct? The way I've read or the video? It's not often a person can actually ask someone from the actual country.. :)
+Brad Fitz I want to know this as well, cause I also heard it the way you said, where it was more of a justified kill( as justified as killing your half brother can be anyways)
+Brad Fitz I want to know this as well, cause I also heard it the way you said, where it was more of a justified kill( as justified as killing your half brother can be anyways)
TheHolycupcake ya, I've been waiting all day for a reply from our Mongolian friend, I'm genuinely interested in knowing what the people of Mongolia hold as truth....
The life story of Genghis Khan is the most inspiring ever. His father was killed by an other tribe when he was only nine years old. After that, the clan abandoned his family to live alone in the harsh cold of The Steppes. Temujin (Genghis) spent his childhood in hardships and slavery. He understood that only Power is survival. Luxury is just an illusion, and that it can end any moment, like it did after his father's death. His rise from a poor boy on a wasteland, to creating The World's Largest Empire is the most real and inspiring story ever told.
He never sought war for plunder or wealth. He always retaliated as a last option. Just by analysing plain facts from his life, you can clearly tell that Genghis Khan had one of the strongest wills and principles.
He is a role model for everyone
I mean there was a lot of bad things in him aswell... He LOVED raping women for example. He also slaughtered millions of innocent people
Bro he killed so many innocent civilians…. Might as well worship hitler weirdo
Thanos -wipes out half of the population.
Genghis- let me start a new population.
boiling alive? no thanks.
Hey, that's pretty good I would rather die in battle quite frankly
Don't forget after boiling alive to fling the corpses over besieged settlements, wait that was Kublah Khan but I can imagine Genghis Khan doing it too.
it is wrong fact, his enemy boiled his men
+purpleprinc3 That was pretty nice of them a free meal before the battle. Meat was hard to come by in Mongolia back in those days during the winter months from what I understand. Any meat would be a delicious treat 👲=🍖🍖🍖👌
Darren Barghest damn it must have been a nightmare to live in those days. What if you wanted to escape going to war for Khan or fight against him? How would you get away from that?
Videos like this inspired me to start reading again!
If you read a book on gk u would learn how inacurate this video is
so that you cold actually learn instead of being fed the crap in the video?
Quadrillion aire u never read
Check out the war crimes of America and Japan its insane just how much and how f**ked up it is (And they are rarely talked about in contrary to the german war crimes)
For number 8, you seem to be forgetting that at the time, there was very little food, and in order to stay alive, it had to be shared. However, his brother refused to share the food. Consequently, Temujin killed him. Whilst this may seem brutal now, it was likely that his family may not have survived if he hadn't done that.
he is psychopat
@@robymovie ok
Not only that but in their culture the step brother would have had marriage rights to his mother as he was the eldest of his fathers sons so he had rights to his wives automatically. Ghenghis likely couldn’t stomach that his older brother would be his stepdad too.
and today millions of Mongol people look up to him as a national hero. seriously how messed up should your world view be to admire such a lunatic. it's like if Germans had a status of A.H in all their cities today.
He was also known to be very generous unlike most khans. He favored methods that would ensure that most of his men would not die. And this was hundreds of years ago man Europe had worse torture methods then.
@@gwoahw he killed at least 30 million people when the world population was much smaller and mechanized warfare didn't exist. he is the closest thing to the concept of pure evil in human history.
one of the reasons people don't hate him as much as Hitler is because history is written by Victors, he won and hitler lost. if Germany won world war two Hitler would not be hated as much as he is now.
@@gwoahw if i could travel back in time i would definitely kill these genocidal maniacs in their infancy , without breaking a sweat. i'm sure it would be easy. right!
As brutal as he was that man was an absolute genius.
Michael Ross Yep
Hitler lost.. Genghis didn’t.
laser kitty Ikr
I would choose Genghis as my Pokemon to fight hitler
@@lordwhorzingus7403 genghis lost he died and lost the empire so did hitler
8. Temujin's half brother was not sharing food and taking what they caught, he was killing them slowly, they had just been kicked out their clan, deserted and desolate, they were desperate. Temujin had to kill his half brother for his family to survive, in my opinion at least.
purpleprinc3 No, you just read the book by Conn Iggulden.
Your opinion, pah!
purpleprinc3 are you a mongol? do you speak mongolian?
Nick Stone Oh shizer that's where I remembered it from! Spot on, got fact and fiction mixed up there.
Celestia Virux No & no 8)
purpleprinc3 is right, his half brother was bully and selfish kid.
Stalin is thanos, he snaps his fingers and you are never heard of again
Putin is thanos he has largest nuclear weapons he could erase us in a blink of an eye
There's no way Khan is not burning in hell..
#4 was wrong. He was one of the most tolerant to other cultures. Really towards the end of his life he was
I agree
agreed
@I like your neck Oh well! That makes it all OK then... NOT!
@@stuartharrison9944 Well he just did what every other country did before they attacked him. In a world where violence gets you at the top you gotta do what you gotta do. Every country did this. He was just the best at doing this. He did all of those things with his people in mind. He attacked China because he knew China would never let a unified country that close to its borders and would’ve attacked Mongolia anyways so he made the first move.
He's a national hero in Mongolia...People love the guy
Laughing Man that's messed up that's like Germans still revering hitler
maybe Genghis was a modest man who was an ambitious conqueror?
Patrick Flynn modest? He literally changed the earths environment and weather by killing over 50 milk people, essentially stopping the vast majority of of human activity in Asia. How on earth do you equate that with modesty
It's because we get our information about Genghis Khan (correctly written Chinggis Khaan) from a book called Secret History of The Mongols. It mostly talks about the good things he did like being loyalty, honor and mercifulness (sending missionaries before attacking) etc.
Besides, no one except Mongolians can say 'our ancestor who started as a slave managed to conquer most of Eurasia'.
He is not comparable to hitler or stalin or people like that. Genghis Khan was a brutal conqueror for sure, but he was not an evil person in any way. He was quite caring and compassionate for those who were close and loyal to him, and he treated all the subjects in his empire fairly. Once you were incorporated into the mongol empire, you were given religious freedom, access to the largest economy in the world, and didn't have to worry about war because you were under mongol protection. It would have been comparable to living in the roman empire.
At the end of the day the mongols probably had a positive effect on the world.
I’m sorry but you left out important information on number 9. The Russian princes killed Mongolian ambassadors who were seeking diplomacy! That’s why the mongols captured them and then put them under the floorboards of their gers.
I agree as mongolian
Love how he said merciful then says non merciful.
You forgot to mention that Genghis Khan loves Twinkies. Just ask Bill and Ted.
areasevenpro way..
areasevenpro best comment on here
areasevenpro /You dont Story of Ghengis Khan -Temuujin
Who doesn't
STATION!
WRONG! Your version of him killing his brother is inaccurate. His brother went hunting for food and was eating the food and not sharing it with the family. Genghis caught him doing so and killed him. They were hungry and the brother was hoarding the food before returning to camp. I'd say he had it coming.
Had it coming? Alright then, you're a sociopath...
Andrew Fitins Times were brutal, if your ancestors weren’t sociopaths you wouldn’t be here.
@@gregormundell1058 Completely irrelevant, you aren't actually trying to say that killing your brother over eating food he should of shared was a necessary method of survival?
Business Yes, one less mouth to feed. In times like that one meal could be potentially life saving. The food his brother hoarded could very well have killed everyone else by proxy so he deserved what he got.
@@gregormundell1058 So by killing his brother does that make the food situation better, does it improve their chances of getting food in anyway ? One less mouth to feed? sounds like he was feeding himself. Your logic is non existent. I don't know but maybe he could threaten his brother or just take the food but killing a family member who at the very least can hunt accomplishes nothing.
Can I suggest that you do : top 10 most horrific facts about the UK collonial past... include opium distribution/ pushing, slavery and brutal exploration of the colonies... it would be fascinating. :)
Nah, how about instead they do a top ten Serbian atrocities of the Balkan wars? Might be something you're more familiar with you Chetnik fuckwitt.
The fact that he got the history timeline in the description COMPLETELY WRONG proves how much inaccurate this whole video is
Yeah I was like attilla the hun and Romans after Genhis Khan really??
Well its not inaccurate. Do you ever read history? Like from actual scientific resources.
@@furkans.9749 I am sure mishka didn’t read or know about truth
Mishka you are a bustard
I agree. This video is full of embellishment and half truths. Painful to watch
That was just how you did it back then. The more cities you wiped out, the more likely the next city would surrender without a fight.
Egyptian mamluks killed mongols messangers and wiped mongolians out of the middle east, without the mamluks who knows mayb they would have went to africa
ashiinsane90 mongol scouting party*. rest of armies were pulled back because of the death of khan.
Interesting on #4 with some claiming that Khan was tolerant with other religions. I noticed that Wikipedia has this in the Genghis Khan entry:
"Genghis Khan was a tengrist, but was religiously tolerant and interested in learning philosophical and moral lessons from other religions. He consulted Buddhist monks, Muslims, Christian missionaries, and the Taoist monk Qiu Chuji.[29]"
The Muslims commited Jihad and killed his ambassador thats why
Tengrist/Tenger means sky in mongolian and its not actually a religion we just love mother earth and father sky.
Genghis Khan was an atheist
Quite misleading , he always attacked those who attacked his family and people, so it was norm and still is you only giving Skelton view of great.king
Ok that argument just justified the slaughter of millions of innocent civilians cool
Yeah cuz those children killed them right
You sir is the definition of an idiot. Genghis was the Hitler of medieval times. 10-15% of worlds population mostly civilians was mass slaughtered by your idol. That number is equivalent to over 1 billion human beings in todays world.
@@nycbk9043 There are so many Genghis Khan sympathizers lol
Human rights: exists
Genghis enters.
Human rights: who me ?? Oh no i am just a flying comet. See you in the 20 century.
-He poured molten silver into greedy Shakhs who killed his merchants, not every single dude he saw
-Did not spill noble blood because we believed that human soul is in their blood. For us being suffocated in cow leather and other executions were type of honor, it wasn't made to inspire fear.
-Why are you always saying he was "Blood thirsty remorseless killer"
-Killing was not habit, they had a choice, and the ones who refused died honorably defending their homes
-Khan is like regional or tribal chief, in Mongolian Хан, and Khaan is the emperor in Mongolian Хаан
-It's Chingis, Чингис in Mongolian, Russians brought up that wrong one Ghengis
-Love how you slaughtered the name Zev, it's Зэв in Mongolian which means "Arrowhead", it was nickname given to him by the emperor himself, his real name is Зургаадай
-That ally you mentioned was brutal even in our standards, dude boiled captured people in a big cauldron which was used to boil whole sheep and no he didn't eat them, it was kind of decimation which was aimed to affect enemy morale
-There is evidence of all sorts of religious temple in the capital Kharkhorum, which the emperor himself ordered to be built, fact that he did not tolerate other religion is pure hogwash, he new if he messed with anyone's tradition the empire would not last long so he did not force nomadic food and tradition to anyone he conquered
-It's not human shield, it's auxiliary unit, any smart general would not want to waste his men when you're on campaign for over 5 years
-Mongolians do not worship "god", it's the will of the eternal sky to kill the opposing dudes
I believe you just salted most of the fact to make him seem as "evil and brutal" leader. I did not meant to undermine your research, and since the story is written by the victors I do not believe the version I'm saying is 100% true. As a true scholar you and I should make the best out of both versions and carry on with out research. The video was certainly interesting as how the Europeans seen us in the past times. I believe the cunning tactic that aimed to make us seem brutal cold blooded killers certainly succeeded since this is how you people think we used to be like. Cheers mate
Namsrai Tsend Nigga shut up
Thank you, that was a lot of interesting information. Exchanging information like that is a great thing. We’re still learning a lot that was buried in the history of the US, which is far younger and fresher. We should have no expectation that we’ve gotten everything correct from far older histories.
guardian bravo 😂😂
He wasnt cruel he usually only killed when when he was disrespected. Such as one time he sent a messenger to trade with a nearby empire and they beheaded his messenger and sent him the head. So he burnt down the city and diverted a river over his birthplace to leave no remnants of his existence. You dont go in a wolf den and hit the wolf then get pissed when it rips off your arm.
Michael Schemmel stop talking
Pretty bold use of the word "fact" here guys. Just about everything we know of genghis was written by the Chinese, as the Mongols didn't have much of a written language.
I've heard the opposite of several of your points, religious tolerance being a big one.
That being said I enjoyed the video and hearing other theories.
If the Khan was brought back to life today, how many life sentences would he get?
As much as the entire universe if possible.
I would be more concerned about how many ppl he would continue to kill before meeting any of those life sentences...
Lets base the US sentence of murder
US sentence for murder is 40 years every victim counts
40x40 million = 1.6 billion years hahaha
@@rakkersdoraya1233 lmao
Legally he couldnt be held responsible for all of those victims though because he was involved indirectly in most cases. The sentence would still be enormous of course.
I like how he goes on describing the genocide of millions of innocent people with a peppy little jingle playing in the background
You have the most interesting site on TH-cam. I so enjoy all this info and facts.
:)
That statue on the thumbnail is pretty cool
Lee Chan sure as hell
It's really cool to go to. There's an observation deck that you can look out and have a great view of the steppes around. There's also a museum inside the bottom of the statue. If you get the chance to go to Mongolia it's worth a visit.
Michael Harris seriously ? Dude I gotta visit it!!
This is the biggest equastrian statue in the world
Its real its in mongolia
7:37
That picture is actually from Sikh history.
@Sourabh Ghosh Yeah, but I was referring to the martyr.
Exactly what I pointed out the moment I saw it. Glad, you noticed it dear ;)
It just an example
Finally fam I was looking for someone who noticed it
When Temujin was about to kill his brother he knew what temujin was going to do and accepted it with one last request. That temujin would protect his little brother
stop bshitting
A love reading and watching stuff about genghis khan.. would love to visit mongolia one day during the festival..
I have been reading the conn iggulden conquer series about genghis khan if you like him a would recommend those books ..
He is my favourite historical person.. all everyone wanted to do was take over the world lol
life back in those days had no value
You know, you have sense. I so agree with you.
it doesnt these days either
George Little Uhhmm...I think not only Asians, what about Adolf Hitler? He's not asian. Just sayin'
And you're telling me it does now in the Middle East or during World War Two?..
You remember it well eh?
Guy at 7:40 in the cauldron thinking "Hmm, this may be s tad overly warm."
Eating lunch on top of a box with defeated leaders suffocating inside is pretty OG
I find it strange when talking about Genghis Khan that his invasion of Europe is entirely left out. or at best just casually mentioned.(usually)
Tree Nelson he wanted to trade peacefully
tree , tamerlane took over where Genghis left off , they killed many hindus ,
Genghis never took part in the campaigns in Europe. He left it to his generals Subutai and Batu Khan
If europe was conqueror by mongols it wasnt europe now it was asia!
He is worst than Hitler
Genghis Khan allowed people to practice any religion they wanted in places he captured. He was actually very tolerant for his time. His beef with Jews and muslims was that they said certain food was unclean and this was against the great law of the mongols. They were free to practice their religion but were not allowed to tell people not to eat pork or anything like that. They could do it themselves though
@St.Lucifer けっぱくさ Lucifer Morningstar not surprised. We have a lot of fake news outlets.
CHB5 Interesting.
Pretty sure his beef with the Muslims was because kwarizm killed some of his envoys
This has a lot of questionable information.
Questionable?
+1733-635-3310 anytime honey.
Truth, ppl will believe anything the internet says
Exactly, the information seems so baised and he should at least let people know the source of the information. I suggest everyone to watch the documentary on genghis khan by bbc this video has persued the great conqueror in a wrong way.
Yes very questionable… there’s some half truths but most of that is embellished for clicks and likes
I didn't know that johny sins is a history teacher too.
KHAaaaaan!!!!
Eddie Deez Nuts Ted-Ed.
***** Star trek movie reference.
BLEEEEEEET!!!!
I am mongolian and I am pretty proud they got all of them pretty much on point
Norman Hampton I don't live in Mongolia I am studying abroad and I know a lot about my countries history. In Mongolia you do have internet in the big cities :-)
I heard there is a ghost town in Mongolia
Nishant Sengar yeah they found few years back in inner Mongolia
Good luck with your studies! Conquer those exams! hehe
purpleprinc3 don't just conquer, slaughter those exams.. hehe
Who’s here after playing ghost of Tsushima?
Me
Me but he wasn't the leader during the games era
That was genghis khan grandson
@@vishanyonjan4874 exactly
Ya bro
His conquests were brutal, his rule was not. His rule was peaceful and virtually everyone thrived.
Nah, look at how many chinese he massacred.
@@youtubedeletedmyaccountlma2263 rebelling under his rule surely wasnt smart, or resisting to him. But he still spared artist and many with a talent, Led them serve to him.
@@desselerant1806 Not really. When he come in, he massacred literally 80% of the population. He don't have reasons to do it, the army was defeated but the first thing he did is to massacre the population for easier control.
Don't put today standard judging him
Well, at least Genghis allowed people to keep religious liberties. . . .
(minutes later) Oh well. . . . .
he did but only to those who joined his empire and had the right attitude.
So did the Persians actually the Persians were the first free slavery and accepted any religion and that was before Mongolian era.
So he has something in common with the Roman predecessors.
No it's in the way they are treated allowing religion in a large land empire is not revolutionary or unique. As said in the video jews and muslims were oppressed. The mongols burned russian orthodox churchs then the mongols didnt tax them and allowed the russians to practice christianity since the mongols couldnt do much. Theres little evidence to show the effect these religious individuals had on the mongols and mongol empire.
As one of the Khans descendants i found this educational
So how are your days these days sir??!
😂
I think a lot of people are....
Liar
@@boogeyman1016 1 in 200 men in Asia are....
Hey Simon, I am from Kiev, where GENGHIS KHAN in 1237 (supposedly) lost half of his army (one half of the million) during the siege. Read many books and articles about it. However, according many historic scholars, that never happed. The thing is, it was logistically impossible to travel such large army across immense distance from Mongolia. Can you look into it and maybe do video?
Genghis Khan was dead by then...it was his grandson Batu Khan!
Not if you take your food with you like they did.
The Mongols took Kievan Rus very easily so the historic scholars are correct.
There was a movie made about Genghis Khan called The Conqueror, starring (and I am not making this up) John Wayne as Genghis.
Bwahahaha... I googled this... it is true! 🤣🤣🤣
It's really bad, possibly his worst movie. His "Genghis Kahn" "acting" was indistinguishable from his "American Cowboy" and I'm actually a fan. Of his movies.
Why is John Wayne playing Ganghes Khan funny...Ganghes Khan was of Irish, and German decent, plus he was born and raised in California...
love the videos keep it up guys
TopTenz Top ten horrifying facts about the crusades
Thats cool because if you remember i had suggested it in a previous video
josh wells qq
Khan mess around with Mongols ...
The host looks like Johnny sins but with a beard
@1misanthropist oh Schopenhauer you've got dirty
I'm a Mongolian and sometimes people think that Mongols are brutal. Well we aren't actually. Ok actually I might be a little brutal to some people when they make me mad but whatever 😌😅
Just for information.
that Kingdom he his talking about as being slaughtered is persia
H. A. R. D
H. A. R. D why
because khwaresmian empire is persia just like the persian mathématician al-khwaresm i guess...
are you referring to #1?
H. A. R. D khwarazmshah empire
Can you do Attila the Hun aswell someday?
Khan did all this? He seemed like a cool guy in Bill and Ted's excellent adventure
number 8-From what I read Genghis and his family were left for dead by their tribe after his father died.They were almost starving and his older brother would hunt and eat the food himself without sharing it with the other family members.
That is the reason he was killed.
he is simon Whistler but why he wont whistle
He has said that he is indeed a remarkable whistler. you need to show us a sampling of your whistling, Mr. Whistler.
Grateful Dead true
ur name is nirap singh.....y dont u sing....
Maybe he can rap.
Nirap Singh ...because he only whistles while he works?!🤔
Wow now that's pretty badass.
Thank you, subscribe to enlist as I rebuild the Mongol Empire to it's rightful place as rulers of the world.
Even if Genghis Khan is not real, the ugly Mongolian race remains a pervert that does not deserve to exist
He was a great innovator and commander, also very normal and humane in terms of nomadic standards. In nomadic conquering tradition if you do not obey at first place, you usually get killed. The khan just killed who disobey or harm him / his subjects and he was an unrivaled conqueror so the numbers on statistics are big (we are talking about conquest of almost whole Asia that time, c'mon!).
Your documentary is like my grandma's science fiction about monsters 😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Lmfao😂😂😂 its mythology and supernatural stuff which our grandmas tells us..
It is impossible to imagine confronting Genghis Khan on the war path even if you know the 10 facts.
LOL?
Wow u have actually have lots of subscribers
Its cos he actually won. If he lost half way, he'd've been demonised.
Alexander was given an army from right out the gate.... Was never "we started from bottom now we're here" true story
He had to take out rival generals before he had full control of his recently deceased father's kingdom.
7:37 I got a molten chicken ad at that moment 😐
Khan was brutal yes but this is a brutal age he simply had the biggest and best army and any other nation had what he had they would do the same thing
we should also look at some of the good things he did creating the silk road tolerated all religions he reasoning for slaughtering a city is no different then the US's atom bombing killing some saved many more through their fear
women were also treated very well there are several laws Khan created that made treating women like property illegal and women could inherit and administer land men were still dominant but it was a massive difference from europe were at this time women were chattel
He did have a good quality that most of the other great men of history cannot lay claim off. He never betrayed anyone, and was really loyal and go out of ways to help his friends. He tolerated his wife for carrying his enemy's child, he brought that child up as his first son, he fought an empire to avenge the unjust death of lowly soldiers who served under him. He got betrayed a lot but never betrayed anyone according to historical record as we know. The brother he killed was a person who refused to share food with other kids in the family and was generally being a bully.
pypy1986820 yep and he had a proper duel with his brother, the same thing could've happened to him
John Smith The video just said he didn't tolerate religions...
this is is untrue as evidence by all known history of him en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_Mongol_Empire
Tolerance of religion was kinda volatile in the Mongol Empire. For example, when the Pope would call a crusade on your empire, would you not be a LITTLE cautious from your Christian subjects? Or when the Caliphate calls a Jihad on you, would you not be careful of your Muslim subjects?
As a Mongolian I partially approve this video
Nintendo Intended The fact that TopTenz replied positively means YOU failed m8
hahahahaahahahahahaha
well meet kinsman
I think he is mostly mocking us. So, no i don't approve this.
I'm honestly curious what part don't you approve? I've read up much on Genghis Khan, he was truly, spectacularly an exceptional human being.
There were a string of cities that were absolutely annihilated in the wake of Genghis Khan and his army's onslaught through the khwarezm: Samarkand, Merv, Urgench etc... All were massacred almost to the person. Merv was considered one of the weathliest and most prosperous cities of it's time. .
Two major things he got wrong. It wasn’t just an “enemy” who captured and burned his generals, it was actually Brother. Other thing wrong was he was tolerant in freedom of religion. Same as Xerexes.
#10= Khal Drogo
+Norman Hampton so, khal drogo didn't pour molten metal onto anyone's head??
+Lonely Elk Yeah he did pour melted gold as a symbol for a crown and such and such
but also 9 well not exactly but similar
Ya, that's what I'm saying. I was replying to the guy who commented "nope" when I said #10 = Khal Drogo
You know the dothraki in game of thrones are supposed to be the mongols right?It's obvious
The mongols, huns, Sioux. They're based on alot of different nomadic horse cultures.
Just a bit of background...The picture you used at 7:41 is of Sikh guru Arjun dev ji. He is considered a great martyr. The Mughals of India were trying to force Sikhs into Islam. The Sikhs refused and fought against Mughals. Sikhs fought against Mughals for centuries and prevailed. Sikhs finally established Sikh raj in 1800s. Guru Arjun dev ji was boiled to death in 1606 in the city of Lahore (ironically the city became Sikh capital 2 centuries later). I have read somewhere that Mughals were descended from Mongols.
rani sandhu they mongols you right but isn't Lahore in Pakistan now how is it Sikh Capital ?
+Hablayo pakistan became an independent nation in 1947 before that it was all India. The Sikhs established Sikh kingdom in 1800 under maharaja ranjit Singh. Lahore was the capital of Sikh kingdom.Ranjit Singh died in 1839, his sons and grandson tried to control the kingdom but due to inner conflict and betrayal by dogras the Sikhs lost the kingdom to British in 1849. Most of the Punjab (both punjabs Indian and Pakistani) was under Sikh kingdom. I am a Sikh and I like to read about Sikh history.
While he was passing away he was saying via guru Satnam ji repeatedly
I can’t imagine the ptsd you would get if you went back in time and watched all there horrifying wars especially the siege of Baghdad
That's a lie, Mongol ambassadors had silver poured into their ears when they went to Persia to inform them of the presence of Gengghis khaan.
This guys always so wrong about everything he says
I'm proud of my genetic history, we conquered the world, and if need be, we'll do it again
Khan knew how to get other tribes join him a lot of the time and when they refused he still won against most of them. What I Like is the Mongols where indifferent to what religion a person practiced.
Not Tamuuuujin. It's pronounced Timujin. He unified a country. He set laws and rules. He hated racism or classism. He looked upon a man by the courage and character a man had. Gaaadammit...modern world can learn something from this legend.
Yeah much to learn from a thief, rapist, children murderer, genocidal maniac psycopath I guess there may be some better role models out there lol
@@midare39 grade 2 history? Bummer. At least he's not doing to the middle east what the new world is doing.
@@ashleysitzer6646 no, because hes dead lol, these genghis fanatics are hillarious
@@midare39 and the sheeple go ballistic
@@midare39 Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Vietnam, the Middle East, Somalia and the list goes on.... Oh pardon me, I guess this genocide is fine since your heroes are doing it for a worthy cause 🙄
One day you will insult me for every Chinese I didn't kill, Genghis Khan.
you cant even kill a chicken, little turk
All nations have dark history. But you guys should write on facts. Some of this facts are false. (sorry for bad english)
Which ones?
El Psy 8,5,3. i didnt even heard of this facts when im learning history.
Maybe you just didn't learn all of it. Try googling it
+Bilegjargal Munkhjargal ah so if you haven't been taught about it on your course it didn't happen?...
i know my country's history. Googling my country history is pathetic. And there isnt all true on google.
As a Mongolian, I think this vid is pretty good👌
But some of the facts r not true👎
hehe yu bna
Inky Batgirl hello fellow mongol? хаанаас бичээд бнаа?улаанбаатраас уу?
Can you correct some of the facts please? I'd love to see that.
"I'm the punishment of God, if you have not committed great sins God would not have inflicted a punishment such as me upon you." - Genghis Khan
That's what he said regarding the number 2 fact. That's an epic quote right there.
The Mongol Empire was HUGE. Only empire in history that was bigger was the British Empire.
Number four is demonstrably incorrect. Genghis Khan was generally tolerant of local religious practices so long as they didn't interfere with Mongolian rule. He had many generals that were of various different religions, and the practice of Christianity seemed to particularly appeal to Mongol sensibilities with many of them converting.
"I will make my people follow the law, even if I must kill half of them to do it."
-Temujin
FYI, the entire city which got decimated and the leader poured molten silver into his eyes, was Persia.
Persia is not a city….. 🤦♂️
Got to be one of the most gruesome things I ever heard so far.
I am Mongolian and I'll say that were proud of him because he had the biggest empire in the world
sos ofcourse no go check the history again :))
Well population wise is could be considered the largest empire. But in land mass the British empire beats it but quite a lot, plus it lasted considerably longer. Mongolian only lasted around 200 years, if even that.
El Psy british empire beats it by a small difference not a large one.
martial law, would be like Germans saying they are proud of hitler, since he also managed to conquer many nations.
MultiDEVILMAYCRY123 the British were also responsible for 150M+ deaths. They massacred entire populations.
Did you know that the Vietnamese was the first one defeated the Mongo?
They've lost battles before they tried to invade Vietnam.
They couldn't invade india too
This is barely accurate. Genghis Khan was certainly brutal but he was also very innovative. If you read Genghis Khan in the making of the modern world which I have and is considered to be the most accurate history of his life you'll find that a lot of this is not true. I'm not going to list everything but he was actually very tolerant of religions and cultures as long as they submitted to the fact that he was the supreme ruler. He protected holy men teachers women and children etc. So long is basically they said he was the boss. He initiated a world mail system and protected trade routes and merchants. He also did not care of your status when you were born everything was earned in his culture. Which basically means you could have no name when you were born and rise to The top in his system and being born of high status meant nothing. he also took care of the families of his soldiers if they were to die in battle forever. I could go on and on but there's a lot of misconceptions about the Mongols actually. Don't get me wrong they were extremely brutal at times but very unique and progressive in other ways as well.
Number 5, wrong, he would be merciful if they had surrendered
very inspiring! Not even close to what USA oil companies and coffee companies do on a daily basis.
US was built on greed and selfishness, alot americans do things not because they should but because they can that country needs anti-asshole laws.
You sound crazy.
Or the European tea companies do.
MultiDEVILMAYCRY123 where are you from?
it's pronounced (chin-giss han)
Khaan Khaidav it depends on what language you speak and how it pronounces the "Gh" or "Kh.
Big chungus
Chungus con
I farted 🍑 💨
Are you a Mongol?
I believe there were valid reasons for his brutality.
Nop
His murderous invasion actually helped scrub about a 700million tonnes of carbon from the atmosphere.
@@RANDOM-pf1ve how about how he raped many women, how did that help the environment...
Also the world had a way lower population back then so if someone decided to kill millions of people right now for the better of the environment, would it be worth it, and would that be a valid reason for brutality?🤔
In Ancient times whoever was strongest, survived. What else did you think would happen in medieval times....
The Wrath of Khan!
ChannelRalph khaaaaaaaaan khaaaaaaaaaan khaaaaaaaaan
No kidding.
ChannelRalph The kahn is nothing to admire he was a savage ,muderous beast ,worse than any animal
Bob Martin I agree. I don't admire people like him.....never said I did. Peace.
Dan Carlin?
Great historical content! Love it!
To think that the Khawarmiyan empire might have survived if they have not killed the envoy. The Jin empire might have survived if they have not asked for tribute.
Imagine the world population now if Chingis Khaan wasn’t alive.