Bach - Prelude in B minor - Baltic Sea Philharmonic - Live from Tchaikovsky Concert Hall, Moscow
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.พ. 2025
- Baltic Sea Philharmonic
Kristjan Järvi, conductor
Live from Tchaikovsky Concert Hall, 23 April 2016
Programme:
Johann Sebastian Bach /Arr. Charles Coleman: Prelude in B minor
Join Baltic Sea Philharmonic online:
/ balticseaphilharmonic
/ balticseaphilharmonic
open.spotify.c...
/ balticseaphil
baltic-sea-phi...
Music has no boundaries. May the world be peaceful.
Never heard this beautiful piece with an orchestra, usually played on piano but I love this rendition, full of emotion - just gorgeous! thank you
It's a knock that opens the doors to souls...
Божественно !!!
This peace took me completely by surprise. I have heard it before on the piano but when played by an orchestra I have discovered that it’s one of the most beautiful peaces of music ever made. So simple yet it brings together joy, sadness, anxiety and introspection all at the same time.
Bach you will live forever.
The best thing ever!
Veľká Krása Ďakujeme
Absolutely beautiful! What a wonderful Transcription! Thank you for sharing!
Un instant de bonheur et de beauté dans ce monde de Fous 😢
Alexander Siloti arranged this composition by J.S.Bach, Prelude in E minor, BWV 855a
Wundervoll, bewegend, erhaben!
Необыкновенная красота❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
This needs a proper attribution. This is a paraphrase of Bach's Prelude 855a in e minor by Alexander Siloti. It is, effectively, an original composition by Siloti, based on a simple (but lovely) prelude by Bach.
ye s
Definitely! The missing mention of Siloti is criminal. (And let no know say, "Oh but this is an orchestral version of the Prelude by Charles Coleman." Please. It exactly follows the Siloti harmonic arrangement and would simply not exist without Siloti's celebrated arrangement.)
Well not really original right? He took advantage of/ripped off the left hand making it the theme since the beginning, I recognized the e minor in it immediately
@@StoneChords It would not be YT without some highly critical and exaggerated negative comment... Not even a mention of the beautiful interpretation and our unique opportunity to access this concert.
Como siempre, casi de la nada un pequeño milagro de Bach. Abriendo el pomo de las emociones, mil sensaciones brotan y se esparcen por doquier. Bravo, bella y excelente adaptacion para orquesta. Bravisimo.
Amazing ❤
Chorei aqui ❤️
T'his was a great concert. You should upload the incredible Prokofiev PC 3 with Alexander Toradze :)
Aaaaaaaaaaugh,me mató,Bach siempre suena como hallar un nuevo sueño.Any questions,almas fósiles?
I didn't know John Travolta was conducting the orchestra
❤❤❤
Bellissima interpretazione. Rimango però fedele alla prima stesura del brano il periodo n.10 dal primo libro.
Lindo
This is what I refer to as 50s baroque or 50s Bach. Back in the day people spoke of Bach as "the other Beethoven". Those are probably the conductors who made Bach so famous today. Today we play Bach on the piano, Bach on the guitar, Bach on the saxophone, Bach in the style of jazz, but no Bach on a philharmonic orchestra. It's as if that's not allowed anymore. If Bach is so important it should be part of your repertoire. When Mendelssohn introduced Bach's music to the world he performed his music on a symphony orchestra and came with his own interpretation. Every conductor did the same ever since...till today. I doubt Bach would've been as famous today if we had Gardiner and Koopman instead of Stokowski and Charles O'Connell.
Imagine Bach would have been forgotten ...
How bad a place the world would be !
However: Next to Mendelssohn the help of digital media helped rediscovering hundreds of composers these days.
It's just so bloody sorry that modern performers/orchestras want to have a lemma in the Guinnes Book of World Records, being the "specialists" that can perform Bach's Saint Matthew's Passion within 5 minutes. Even Koopman was influenced by that fashion that made the strings of an orchestra squeek, due to ultra-sound speeding.
You might be quite right about Stokovski and O'Connell !
And I don't see enough colors in the orchestra.
Love the comment. We still get a lot of people who scream "you played it the wrong way!" if it doesn't conform to some rigid convention as to style of interpretation. But how wrong they are, as we always hear new interesting things when Bach is transcribed or arranged.
Koopman and Gardiner? For me, in terms of emotion, their Bach does not(!) move me. In any case, Bach interpretation has moved on from then.
0:42
Change the title . It is e minor prelude ,siloti.
1001 strings Romantic Bach? Wrong way to play? No!! Bach always works well in transcription, revealing new aspects of this universal composer.
There is a 200 year history of people saying "you played Bach the wrong way!" But this cannot be true, as Bach interpretation changes markedly , every 10 or 20 years!
Какое великолепное прочтение! Спасибо. Вы превратили мой вечер в праздник! Хочу поделиться: вот как исполняет это же произведение юный мальчик из Украины, по-моему, он ярко-талантлив: th-cam.com/video/X3o3FnJYevM/w-d-xo.html
John Travolta?
Para variar, los camarógrafos echan a perder el momento. Mejor, sólo escuchar el audio.
Нет! Эту прелюдию лучше исполнять только в оригинале( в фортепианном изложении)
That doesn't sound like Bach at all.
Yes, it does!
There is no "typical Bach": he wrote enigmatic philosophical pieces for the end of time, he wrote some jolly jigs in his cantatas, he wrote the deeply tragic music of the Passions, he wrote the crisp vigorous extroverted but complex music of the Brandenburgs. And every time you transcribe Bach, new aspects are revealed. The diversity of his output is extraordinary.
некрасивая( неудачная ) транскрипция