One way and Two way slabs - When to model slab as membrane and when to model as shell thin

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ก.ค. 2024
  • This structural tutorial is attending a structural doubt on one way slab and two way slab behavior. The yield line theory assumption of Ly/Lx is an approximate method for load distribution.For more accuracy,the stiffness of slab needs to be accounted by modelling a slab as a shell thin in ETABS and by modelling slabs as elements in staad pro. When to model a slab as membrane and when to model as shell thin is attended in this video
    The points are summarised below
    When is a slab one way
    When is a RCC slab 2 way
    What is yield line theory?
    What is the limitation of yield line theory
    Why is yieldline theory providing safe results
    What are the better methods for slab analysis
    #When to model slab as membrane and when to model it as shell thin.
    What happend when there are only 2 supports for a slab
    What you need to do when there is only 3 supports for a slab
    What to do when there is a point load in a slab
    How to treat cutout in a slab
    How to distribute load when there is an irregular shaped slab.
    The answer to most of these questions are same. You need to bring in interaction between slab and beams and let the stiffness play its role in load distribution than going by thumb rules like Ly/Lx or Long span/ short span
    If you understand these basic concepts of slab and shell analysis then your structural design in software like ETABS will be more effective.
    I suggest you like this video, Like our channel, Follow my channel and also follow my blog. The link is mentioned in the video.
    Happy learning! Provide your comments :-)
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 24

  • @Muhamadyaseen786
    @Muhamadyaseen786 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thank you sir

  • @devangrathod8115
    @devangrathod8115 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Always worth watching your videos sir.
    Full on knowlegede and your unique way of teaching makes hard things very simple to understand.

  • @PankajSingh-me4th
    @PankajSingh-me4th ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Very informative loved it.

  • @nicolasmarie4398
    @nicolasmarie4398 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi. Thanks for the video. There are situation where we have to put the Longer Bar as B1 and the Shorter Bar as Distribution/B2 bars for example if there is a cantilever adjoined to the longer direction. I will greatly appreciate if you can talk more about this? Thanks.

    • @CIVILERABangalore
      @CIVILERABangalore  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      B1 need not be always short even in normal slabs. It is dependent on many things. In site it is not practical in a large building as adjacent slabs may have different orientation.
      For your cantilever question, see if this video has any info th-cam.com/video/8GPx8ZIrZCM/w-d-xo.htmlsi=9LUZqg4tTEkJIciA

  • @ravishankar.p5542
    @ravishankar.p5542 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir really your teaching is excellent 👏please I need more more videos sir....🙏🙏 Thank you so much sir.....

    • @CIVILERABangalore
      @CIVILERABangalore  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nice to see your comment Ravishankar. Nice to know you learnt from it. More videos will come but you can choose to enroll for my flagship course too if you have not 🙂

  • @manuswaruprajsekar1775
    @manuswaruprajsekar1775 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very well explained sir. Thank u for your effort..

  • @hcStructuralDesigns
    @hcStructuralDesigns 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yes, sir I have experienced this in cype cad.
    In FEM design, one way and two way slab won't work.
    Wherever the more moments we provide more steel on that direction.
    Thank for the video sir.
    You explained the same thing here in this video.

    • @CIVILERABangalore
      @CIVILERABangalore  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      but why? why 1 way and 2 way dont work? It works but only that it is approximate rule of thumb
      The reality is based on stiffness which is captured in shell analysis

    • @hcStructuralDesigns
      @hcStructuralDesigns 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@CIVILERABangalore yes sir.
      In fem design of slab there is possibility of getting more moment in longer direction of slab.

    • @CIVILERABangalore
      @CIVILERABangalore  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hcStructuralDesigns Thats the reality. stiffness decides the flow.

  • @hcStructuralDesigns
    @hcStructuralDesigns 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sir there are two methods for detailing for slabs, one is crank bar method and another one cut piece method.
    Can explain two methods in detail.
    Which method is easy and economical???

    • @CIVILERABangalore
      @CIVILERABangalore  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Its all covered in the courses. Is it possible to achieve detailing by cranking if the bottom rebars and top rebars are considerably diffferent? cranking works well when the slabs are small and spacings are all uniform

  • @salmanlaakhani1773
    @salmanlaakhani1773 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sir, how to be add in your group ???

    • @CIVILERABangalore
      @CIVILERABangalore  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you are in my list, you would have got the invite some time. Check mails.

  • @zuberibrahimsultan8771
    @zuberibrahimsultan8771 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Which model is more accurate, membrane or thin shell ???

    • @CIVILERABangalore
      @CIVILERABangalore  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      shell thin will be.

    • @zuberibrahimsultan8771
      @zuberibrahimsultan8771 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@CIVILERABangalore could you tell me why ???

    • @CIVILERABangalore
      @CIVILERABangalore  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@zuberibrahimsultan8771 Should be in the video. Membrane will replicate Yield line theory behavior and shells would do stiffness based

    • @zuberibrahimsultan8771
      @zuberibrahimsultan8771 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@CIVILERABangalore got it. And thanks