(Ken) Ham & AiG News - Neanderthals, Cannibals and Filthy Toddler Sinners
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024
- Ken Ham and his team have a bi-weekly "news" show, reacting to the news stories of the day from a Christian young-earth creation perspective from the Answers in Genesis staff at his Creation Museum.
On their March 13, 2017 program, Dr. Georgia Purdom and Ken Ham as they discussed cannibalism, Neanderthals, morality development, and much more in this episode of Answers News. Join Ken Ham, Dr. Georgia Purdom, embryo experiments, and more on this episode of Answers News.
Morgan
/ indigogentleman
Answers News March 13, 2017
• Answers News - March 1...
Follow me at
/ paulogia0
/ paulogia0
Hey "Dr." Georgia, salicylic acid is named after _Salix_ spp. because that's where it was first isolated from. _Salix_ is the genus of *Willow* trees, not "Poplar" trees. A _real_ scientist would know her subject. An honest person would know it _before_ arguing against it.
How can you be a sinner, without the concept of sin? I never knew about sin until I went to Catholic school at 7. I thought it was the silliest thing I ever heard. I'm a sinner, because 2 jokers ate an apple. Right. But, aren't you a sinner too? So, how do I know you're telling the truth. Believe me, I knew about lying, my mother was horrible at it. And she tried to get me to do it too. But I had autism & was a total failure at it. Of course, I didn't know I had autism until recently, & it does make it difficult for you to lie.
Marilyn Newman **hugs** well have a nice day bub xx
Even the Apostle Paul said that it was the knowledge of sin what truly condemned humanity.
Well you can break a law without knowing the law, I guess it would work lie that?
“My 5 year old daughter is a guilty sinner”
Religion is disgusting
No her ridiculous take on it is & the doctrine of original sin is quite the worst thing to come out of Christianity & at the time Augustine of Hippo came up with it there where other fathers of the church who disagreed with him. For myself I don't think any one is born evil just in need of being socialised which some have more trouble with than others due to personality disorders & the like. Children have to learn and need supporting and guiding as they do not condemning as wicked sinners, most naughtiness is best understood as the child testing boundaries and learning there from.
WAIT WAIT WAIT...
So, we are perfectly conceived, but formed by god in the womb, but born sinful & evil, but the bible/Jesus said that children are innocent, that we should seek the innocence of a child, but we are not pure until our sins are forgiven/we are baptized... Longest contradiction in the entire book. 😒
I make dinners...
Henk van der Gaast
Wait, ok, so... god created us to be food for him, but being so busy writing all those genetic codes he made a typo & instead ended up making us sinners... ...& then couldn't be bothered to go back & edit the results of his sloppy all-nighter 'cos he wanted to sleep in on Sunday. Maybe that's why he had that thing for sacrificing first-born children? Idk, maybe they're tastier than middle-children...
Meh, makes as much sense as getting stroppy that some of his pets weren't doing exactly what he wanted & drowning everything in a petulant tantrum.
lol.Georgia: "scientists found children start gaining their sense of morality around three years old."Ken: "Exactly. it's just like what the bible says. we are born with a sense of morality 'written on our hearts.'"
but...if we are born with it, why does it not present itself until the age of three?
also, I would suggest Ken look up cases of children who are(horrifically) raised in virtual isolation, and who _don't_ develop a sense of morality, and even after being reintroduced/integrated back into society, and undergoing types of therapy and education, still have bog problems with morality, sympathy/empathy, putting themselves in other people shoes, etc.
Mockturtlesoup1
Also the heart is an organ that pumps blood around the body, and you could live with a replacement and still be the same person. He needs to stop acting like a fuckwit.
I would also question any study that concluded that "children start *gaining* their sense of morality" instead of "displaying a sense of morality". Gaining implies that it is innate rather than learned, and I'm extremely skeptical of that premise.
It's almost like that's the age where children are capable of starting to learn morality from their parents... but that doesn't confirm the bible so it can't be true!
I absolutely LOVE how every episode Ken Ham brings up some outdated info from 50 years ago and says “ SEE! How can you possibly trust people who are willing to change their minds when confronted with new evidence that contradicts their current world view?!!”
I never get tired of that intro song
it IS possible... keep hitting repeat.
I keep getting it stuck in my head and humming it. It gets me some funny looks from my wife
What are the words? I have tried over and over to make them out.
I actually sing along every time 😂😂😂
I sing it daily 😂😂
Oh sure, we atheists eat babies, kittens, and bellybutton lint. It's how we get our magical powers.
wait... we get magical powers?
Hey, how come we can't fly? :-(
Ever since I was small, I dreamed that i could fly. Maybe I was trying to escape from that god that they assigned to me.
Paul, Paul, Paul, you have to eat the adult creatards. The babies just don't have enough armour of Gawd to strengthen us Satan worshipers. Of course, IT IS easier to eat the babies but, surely you want the best for our dear lord Satan. All Hail Satan!
Perhaps a more elegant and intellectual approach will bring some credibility to the cause??? Naa. Let's get down to their level and threaten them with some supernatural bullshit powers.
Re-Re-Re-listening to this ... and STILL loving you calling her "PHD Giggles"... makes me smile inside ! thanks !
Eating babies?
Blackadder introduced us to the 'Baby Eating Bishop of Bath and Wells'
Don't blame us atheists.
I love this collab for Ham and AiG News! Something about Paulogia's calm, fundamentally (no pun intended) "nice Canadian" demeanor combined with Morgan's snark just works for me.
and for me
Ah baby eating, the real way of playing I got your nose.
Still kills 3 years after I first read this lol
A TODDLER A DAY KEEPS THE ATHEISTS AWAY
paul stewart hahahaha
So we are born with some kind of code of goodness from god in our hearts but we are sinners and have a sinful nature? Isn't that contradictory?
that's nothing when you think three deities are one deity.
Paulogia
Who needs math? 2 + 2 = fish. 3 = 1.
*Isn't that contradictory?*
No, because..... reasons.
Sweet, thanks!
It's only contradictory if you live in a rational world. Christians do not.
best video yet!!! I laughed so hard!
is BDSM acceptable? maybe that's when babies are conceived in sin..... I mean ssince their Bible says rape is a marriage proposal....
Creationists don't eat babies, they just judge them.
Is anyone else amused when Ham and Giggles exchange voices due to the time delay on their video?
it's a struggle as to how much time to spend correcting the sync
It's not a sync issue. One is a ventriloquist and one is the dummy. The struggle is differentiating which is which.
Maybe there's two dummies and God is the ventriloquist?
Rusty Walker
No, there is no ventriloquist. ;)
Isn't the view of H.neanderthalensis as a brutish caveman just a comedic caricature for commercials cartoons and popular media? I never knew that science actually said they were that way.
Seems like Ham and Maude Flanders might be guilty of straw man-ing a concept that archaeology never really promoted
are you saying AiG might be straw-man-ing a position they don't or won't understand? what?!?
Paulogia
**gasp**
The first skeleton found was of an old man with rheumatism so, at first, they believed they were all hunched over like that, but they soon found out otherwise. Popular culture often lags behind current scientific knowledge, depictions of brontosaur-ans are still common even though it has been known for some time that they never existed.
Strangely enough, I got several years ago a magazine called science 87, & on the cover was the most recent recreation of a neanderthal. The next day, I went to El Cajon to get something, & I swear I saw a carbon copy of it. Walking with knees bent & hairy as well. So, they're still around. Just not very many.
WF6i I know this thread is ancient, but didn’t they decide in 2015 that the brontosaurus did exist?
Im glad Im not the only atheist who cant get through the quicksand ocean of stupidity in the world without acting like a crazy lady & ranting to myself periodically, like Morgan! 😅
Morgan is the best! (You're good too Paulogia.) Please Morgan start your own channel.
21:08 "I've read these articles where they try to justify homosexual behavior in humans by saying we see it in animals."
No Ken, we don't need to justify this behavior, you don't need to justify something that doesn't cause harm. This point is brought up to counter the Christians saying that homosexuality is unnatural by pointing out that it does in fact happen in nature. That's not the same thing as saying it's okay because animals do it. Never trust Ken to accurately report what someone else said.
EATING BABIES?WHAT?
And no one invited me?!WHAT THE FUCK GUYS.
He deceived us anyway, they never said we eat babies. They just suggested we would excuse cannibals based on nature...because apparently pointing out that no, homosexuality isn't "unnatural" is the argument for it?
Do eggs count, their baby chickens right??
I suppose eating the afterbirth like some animals do to keep predators away is just not acceptable either. Hey you're pushing 1000 subs. Keep it up. Great job as always. Both of you. If Mr. Ham Is a scientist I'm an engineer. Chooo Choooo!
It is amazing how much pontification Ken and Georgia feel qualified to do without any education in paleontology. You'd think they would feel guilty about putting out so much faulty information.
Those two speaking is original sin...thou shalt not steal, thou shalt not bear false witness
Morgan... love the straight forward no BS attitude ! more Morgan please !
Found your channel a while back and been binge watching. This is hilarious, and Morgan is the best!
welcome!
you guys make an amazing team! I enjoyed the last couple videos even more than ussual. I hope to see more of the both of you working together and to see morgan on her own channel as soon as possible!
Love these collabs with Morgan! Keep it up!
Having seen excepts from "Is Genesis History?", I can say it's just painful. They really still try to push concepts like "hydroplate theory" which is ridiculous to the extreme ... it's a mystery how they manage to ignore all the times they already have embarrassed themselves and keep retelling this junk with a straight face.
It amuses me greatly because I keep reading it as, "Genesis is so history", as in, "it's so irrelevant now". I know what they mean but the way they wrod it is just funny to me.
Money, money, money makes the world go around, the world go around, that clinking clanking sound.
IF you are stupid & have zero skills, the best thing to do is feed off of gullible idiots with delusions of grandeur. Said any con artist ever.
+Marilyn Newman You have to have no sense of shame, too.
Morgan's outraged diatribes are the funniest things ever. LOVE LOVE LOVE.
9:20
That animation in the background is really intriguing. I really like the style it uses. A shame it's being used to tell such a horrible story.
15:50
Just once, I'd like a Christian to point out the "sin" gene.
18:40
By inference, she believes that her daughter, her five year-old daughter is worthy of eternal torture.
Harold Camping said on several occasions that babies born to nonbelievers who die in infancy will all go to hell. So, yes, some people actually believe that.
Okay, let's be fair, as a story Genesis is pretty cool. Absolutely no relation to reality, but it's so neat to read as a historian.
22:35 Cannibalism is OK as long as you don't kill the person. So if you find someone who has died from another factor besides that, it's perfectly fine.
Don 't know if I could eat a whole leg. And a whole hole? No thank you
Jesus' disciples did it before his death. Why do Christians examples of moral failing come from God of the Bible himself?
AiG=once again. Well researched and reasoned hypothesis and theory are "just stories" if they don't agree with creationism.
Dave Robson
I think it’s because some Biblical myths are often categorized as “just so stories.” The Creationists superior logical response is “I know you are, but what am I?”
Compare: “The rainbow is a covenant from God that he won’t destroy the world with water again.” - typical “just so story”
“The rainbow is caused by light from the sun refracting through water droplets in the air after a rainstorm.” - an “evolutionist” or “scientism” “just so story?”
I’ve wondered if light behaved differently before Noah’s flood in their world view?
If we are all sinners, and sinners lie, shouldn't that mean we shouldn't trust anything Ham and Giggles have to say?
I love when theism invalidates itself without the need for an external argument.
20:17 Deuteronomy Ch. 28, verse 53: And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters, whom Jehovah thy God hath given thee, in the siege and in the distress wherewith thine enemies shall distress thee.
Mr Ken Ham mentions (7:50) mammals and the Permian Mass Extinction which occurred 252 million years ago; whereas mammals survived the KT Event of 65 million years ago. A bit different, but as Ken Ham believes the universe is just 6000 years old, these big numbers are completely beyond his ken!!!
Duncan Watt ISWYDT 😊👌🏽
"That would be the plan, the plan of sinning and winning" that is going on my fucking tombstone!!!
I feel very sorry for Dr. Giggles' daughter...
"But they're still bacteria." Bacteria comprise a Domain in biological taxonomy. If a Biblical "kind" is a domain, one has to wonder why the ark was so big. Noah and his wife belong to the Domain Eukarya, which covers all living things that have cells with nuclei, including plants (which, you might remember from fifth grade biology, comprise a Kingdom). I assume Mr. and Mrs. Noah's gut flora would take care of the Bacteria, and also possibly the Archaea.
Either we are sinful or we are moral at heart. They have to pick one because it seems kind of mutually exclusive. No?
It’s not mutually exclusive, because some of their “sins” are actually fine, and in that case you can be sinful and moral at heart
Homo neandertalensis >ARE< fully human, just not _modern_ humans (Homo sapiens). They are a separate, previously co-existent, extinct human species, sister to our own, and there appears possibly to have been some (limited) interbreeding once our ancestors began to colonize the areas where Neanderthals had evolved from our mutual ancestor species, Homo heidelburgensis (as opposed to where our species evolved in isolation from them in Africa). It is worth noting that H. heidelburgensis are _also_ fully human in that same sense, as are cousin species such as H. florensis. H. sapiens is >NOT< the only "human" species, merely the only one to _survive_ to the modern day.
If Georgia was a real scientist, she would have a real job. But you have to be competent first. She's clearly not, in anything I've seen to date. She like the bubble head babe on network news mouthing talking points, not really sharing any knowledge of their own. However, she's a great pairing with Kenny. She gives him a run for being the most ignorant person on the I/N. Nuff said.
Here's something I've never understood: If, as the bible states, that the heart is desperately wicked and deceitful above all things then how are we supposed to be able to trust any moral law contained therein? For all that creationists know, any moral law written upon the hearts of men could've been put there by the devil rather than God.
Edited to add: I find it funny that Ken Ham would say that there isn't anything in the bible about eating human flesh, when there is in Deuteronomy. Which confirms my suspicions that he never read his own bible or never understood had he read it.
Why don't snakes talk?
1. no larynx
2. no large brain
3. no powerful lungs
4. no warm blooded metabolism to power the large brain
A talking snake would not look at all like a snake.
Why should we be cursed for the sins of the father. Five year olds are innocent and usually happy in my experience not little sinful demons.
I think the sin is supposed to be in their soul not necessarily their behavior. It’s something you can’t escape from like a curse. Before eating from the tree Adam and Eve were innocent. After... all Earth broke loose and Eden was off limits. So we all live with the aftermath of what two people did at the beginning of time that they would not have done if they had the knowledge gained be doing what they did.
That’s about how much sense it makes to me.
Based on different denominations, the sin comes into play at different times. I won't even try to remember which is which, but some denominations say there's an "age of reason" after which kids can't be ignorant of sin and thus the sins start to accumulate. Another says that babies are born with sin, which is why even stillborn babies need to be baptized.
That's why it's really hard to discuss religion with christians--everyone has the same book but ends up with a completely different understanding.
Can I just say how much I LOVE Morgan! I want to be her bff..lol haha😀😀
It fascinates me that Creationists believe all the impossible goings on in Genesis, yet cannot see facts and evidence even when presented and right in front of their face. I believe the definition of "delusional" is believe otherwise when all the fact point to something else. They qualify...and the Hovind clan too!
While I learn nothing from AiG I do learn cool science from commentary like this so Ken is helping people learn... just indirectly
I think the whole belief that we would be unrestrained sociopaths without God is just another hook the religion has used to keep people in the fold. It isn't that uncommon a belief.
Canabalism.... like; "Take this, my body, and eat of it. Take this cup of my blood and drink of it?"
People don't say "we see homosexuality in nature" as a justification as to why it is not immortal to be homosexual, people use it as a direct counter to people saying "homosexuality is unnatural". You can't pick an answer to a different question and use that to represent your opponents Kenny
𝆕 Ham and eggs 𝆕
𝆕 Ham and eggs 𝆕
𝆕 Flip the fucking 𝆕
𝆕 Flip the fucking 𝆕
𝆕 Ham and eggs 𝆕 😃
A five y/o is not a sinner! Although I'm pretty sure mine were both possessed by the devil on many occasions 😆
I might be wrong here, but isn't eating Jesus' flesh and drinking his blood considered cannibalism?
Saying "But they're still bacteria!" is like saying "But they're still animals!"
It's kind of true that Neanderthals were human - if they were alive today we would recognise them as just another population of humans. However, that's not to say that we can't use genomics to see that they're distinguishable from us modern humans. Basically, if they were alive today, they would be the most different human group, but still human.
I ilke that you pointed out the unfasifiability in Ham and Purdom's comments on the infant morality story. Any study that talks about our innate sense etc right and wrong etc will be taken as evidence that the law is written on out hearts, while any study that talks about people being innately selfish etc will be taken as evidence of our sin nature. Heads they win, tails we lose. It's completely unfalsifiable.
Human yes, H.s. sapiens no. Human isn't a species - sorry - it *wasn't* a species. I guess it is now all the others are dead.
If we interbred with Neandertals, then they and we are the same species, pretty much by definition.
In nature, there really is no such thing as a species, and the interbreeding thing is only one of the traits we use to distinguish between what we classify as species. Our definitions are not absolute, there are plenty of creatures that we classify as different species that can interbreed and still procreate. If we had a sample from every generation since Australopithecus we would not be able to tell when one species ends and another begins or when exactly when splits occurred. Evolution is that gradual. Fossilization is so rare that it makes it easy for us to classify finds as different species, most of the time. The modern notion of clades more closely matches nature, it doesn't make hard separations like the species notion does but relies on basic common genetic traits, it is more about how we are alike than about how we are different. Homo neanderthalensis is a distinct creature, it began to separate from our lineage around 700,000 years ago and was fully distinct by about 350,000 years ago, well before what we now call homo sapiens evolved. They were different enough that we can still recognize their genes in us some 30,000 years after the last of them lived.
_"In nature, there really is no such thing as a species, ..."_
True enough, but that means that you not only can't say that two populations are the same species, you can't say they are different species, either.
_"... there are plenty of creatures that we classify as different species that can interbreed and still procreate."_
Kindly cite an instance where two populations not only can, but _do_, interbreed but are still considered separate species.
Three words, African Killer Bees. They are a successful (e.g. fertile) inter species interbreeding of an African bee with the honeybee, and they are coming soon to a hive near you. Cattle and bison produce fertile beefalo. Another example from the wild is the Polar Bear / Grizzly hybrid (again, fertile), the Grolar Bear. Red wolves are actually a coyote / wolf hybrid that is common in nature.
If you meant something where the fertile offspring are one species or the other, that doesn't happen. In the given cases a new, third species results. Your evolution dollars at work! These hybrids are cases of rapid, large scale evolution, as opposed to the kind of changes that normally happen in every generation, eventually resulting in what we would call new species.
Also review the phenomenon of "ring species" where one species splits into two physically separate populations and each one evolves into new species several times. Each of the two end species can interbreed with the original one (and all of the others in its line) but not with each other. The "if they can interbreed then they are the same species" assertion simply isn't true. It is true however that if two specimens can't interbreed then they are definitely different species. But like I said, nature itself doesn't impose any rules about what makes two plants or animals different species because the very concept of species is a human invention, and a poorly defined one at that. I do not think that attempts to better define what makes two specimens belong to different species will ever meet with much success because nature simply does not play by our rules.
I did enough research to know that there are many instances of inter species interbreeding among plants but I think the examples already given should suffice.
Evolution is happening with every generation of every living thing and eventually there will be a generation that cannot interbreed with an ancestral generation and thus is clearly not the same species as its ancestors, without there ever having been any inter species interbreeding. Humans are great apes, and old world monkeys, and ..., and vertebrates, and ..., and eukaryotes, and ...
Dear Morgan,
There really is no better way to start the day than eating a toddler.
your Bob Gray
Nothing personal against the female commentator, but I'm not a big fan.
Lol yes!!! Anti theist!!! You me and Christopher hitchens!!!
14:32 A zygote is a fertilized cell that has not yet divided. It is a single cell, not a few cells.
"Sinning and winning".
Can I get that on a bumper sticker.
I mean the penguins got all the way back to Antarctica and the kangaroos to Oz. I know I have seen them. Where did the dinosaurs go????
andrew ey
Extinct. Apparently that continent was destroyed. Maybe there’s a biblical passage that explains it? I haven’t heard of one. Or maybe it’s hidden like Eden? Is Eden supposed to be still around? I’m pretty sure it’s not on Google Earth. Someone may have mentioned that. Was Eden destroyed in the flood? So many questions about something I don’t care about...
andrew ey
If Extinct is a place, maybe that explains why only birds escaped? Was Extinct the same as Atlantis?
I’m starting to see where these wacky ideas come from. Maybe Storks delivered marsupials to Australia? (Pseudo)science is so easy.
08:06 Creationist fundies sure like to project a lot, don't they?
This guest co-host is fucking hilarious.
Unless you've been to Beelzebub's Baby Buffet and Blood Orgy, you just haven't lived!
Is that invitation only or a walk-in thing?
The fungus is penicillium not penicillin.
I'm so glad Ken has found something to keep him occupied.
Adam and Eve fell at the same rate.
More like De (half)Witt
"horizonal hula" Lmao......!!!
Hey, one request Paulogia:
Could you even out the volume on the video(s) a bit more. I'm constantly having to turn my volume up and down because it varies so widely. Other than that, great videos. :o)
This is a pretty old video, and I definitely had much to learn. I think my new ones are better, but please let me know if you're experiencing the same on more recent stuff. Thanks.
@@Paulogia, you're right. I didn't think about that. Thanks for pointing it out! And I don't think I've noticed it nearly as much on more recent videos, now that you've mentioned it. My bad! :o)
gotta love that PHD giggles giggle montage
Say wait a minute one more time
Morgan swearing again.
Awesome show both of you!
Keep on, keep on. Love it
Ooookkkaaayyy...not sure where they're going with this, but they do know lionesses will eat their dead cubs, right? Obviously, they won't kill their cubs, but they will eat them after they're dead
Others have to cover up logos in videos and you're adding them in? When you get bigger, you'll be getting letters.
This makes me SUPER uncomfortable but, I just gotta say it:
WE DO, kinda, try to eat our moms, 1ST THING, when we r born...
After all, WE DO drain her body of nutrients - through her breasts. We actually take part of our Mom into our mouth, immediately upon our 1st meeting. Then, FOR MONTHS, we greedily utilize all of our strength &effort &focus to gorge ourselves while simultaneously depleting her.
Now, SURE, we moms instinctively consume more &our body naturally makes EXTRA of everything to make up for MOST of it. Of course, our babies CAN only eat us if we give ourselves to them, &we CAN (to some extent,) choose how much we consume. So, usually, there's enough left over, to keep us nourished, as well. AND, if neccessary ,we COULD always cut our baby off, at any time, if we started feeling depleted.
BUT - no matter how much nature &culture has evolved this inborn, cannibalistic urge, turning it into a beautiful, emotionally bonding &loving experience that benefits our entire society - a breastfeeding a baby IS, essentially, "eating" his/her mother. In the same way, a vampire, or parasite, "eats" it's victims.
A person who behaves well and does good things without rules coming from without (God, whoever) is less evolved morally than the person who doesn't need the rules spelled out (especially the 10 Commandments!). This tripe about "you can't have morality without God". Who said so? Religion. Who is moral? Lots of people doing good. Sorry you need to be told those basics. Again, it's just the Bible, because you believe it with no thought, because its obedience, faith....but not evidence. Those highs you think are Jesus? They could be from anything. All over the world with all people can experience the numinous without a Bible.
EVOLUTION is just not that hard to understand!!!!! You have to work like hell to even fathom creation, Ham is an actual egg, with all it's brains, Now i have to apologize to the EGGS of the world.
Morgan's response is how a sane person should react.
Fuck fuckity fuck fuck fuck. I don't fucking underfuckingstand deism therefore I fucking ask simple fucking questions and don't want to fucking know the fucking answer fuckity shit fuck. So poetic. So enlightened. 🙁
Um, the concept of "fair" is unique to English-speaking cultures. It doesn't really exist in other languages - they don't have an equivalent word to describe the concept. I think my favorite example of this was a guy whose kids were bi-lingual (English and Polish) would actually use the English word "fair" in an otherwise completely Polish sentence when complaining that something wasn't "fair." The father (who was a linguist) explained that the reason they did that was because "fair" is a concept unique to English and there's no real word for it in Polish.
I don't remember the name of the paper. It was part of the assigned reading for my Linguistic Anthropology class. But basically, there's a lot of assumptions based on language and culture that native English speakers make when they do studies that are cross-cultural as well as developmental.
Ken Ham is always very down on people he calls "Evolutionists". Well, I've just invented a term to describe Ken and those who share his beliefs on the topic - "PAN-evolutionists". This stands for "Post Ark Narrative - Evolutionists" for they believe all those "kinds" went on to diversify (in only a few thousand years) after the flood. So, they do believe in evolution - it's just after the ark.
What a terrible thing for Ham when he lays on his death bed even if he never knows it but to spend your *LIFE* spreading shit & propergating nonsense....All the energy & resorces he has effectively slung down the toilet including public money with the *Ark* debacle.....can you imagine how much *ACTUAL* good all that could have done?
If morality is "written on our hearts" then there should ZERO immorality. Clearly it us not "written on our hearts".
If it is evolutionarily selected for, then the existence of anomalies (sociopaths) is easily explainable.
I don't want to kill people... except for all fundamentalist believers. :)
"Have you not had children? They are sinners!" Credit where it's due: Yes, that was a witty response.
But something else you might say: "Have you not had children? They are monkeys!"
the first computers were not that good but thanks to the EVOLUTION THEY HAVE GOT BETTER AND BETTER
You don't believe in evolution.
You understand it.
You don't understand God.
You just believe on faith.
Unfounded, unfalsifiable, non predictive, evidence free faith.
I thought we’re born sinful because eating forbidden fruit transmits the knowledge of good and evil (genetically?) somehow. Also, because of this, Mary was made sinless before Jesus was conceived to make his conception immaculate. Isn’t that the reason the Jesus human sacrifice story is supposed to work? So Jesus can be the sacrifice to save 5 year old sinners?
John 6:53: "Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you." What more can one say? Protestants think this is hyperbole; Catholics don't.
Morgan, for an explanation of a mainstream and horrific view on babies and their "sinful nature", see the TH-cam video "Welcome to This World", The Thinking Atheist.
I wonder whether Ohio State University has any "Code of Conduct" for its PhDs? Usually you get a PhD for a work in the scientific field. You need to show with your work that you are able to do science. That you understood the scientific method. But afterwards? If it shows in your words and writings later on that you have not understood the simplest methods of research, that you have not understood, how theories build up on evidence? Then you have proven that your PhD is worthless and should be taken away from you again, right? It falls back onto the universities if they don't care what people do with their PhDs later on.
(23:06) "... they did it with non-organic vegetables ..."
This right here shows that Ham doesn't know shit about science or nature.
I don't understand how people can even deny creationism, when you look at the mountains of evidence we have amassed for god magic, talking snakes and donkeys, dragons and unicorns, people living inside fish, and the bible's description of the solar system. Rotfl. 🤣
Yeah, neanderthals were so sophisticated. _Me am Gug. Me am bitey-thing hurt. Bitey-thing am hurt less when Gug chew dis plant. Gug am chew dis plant. Gug bitey-thing no hurt!_
Because it requires so much freaking _sophistication_ to pull your hand out of the fire when you notice putting your hand in the fire burns your fucking hand. That's some fucking piano recital and opera on Ritz crackers sophistication alright.
Yeah. Two legged, cow-like creatures would be ridiculous. You'd get a biped that eats grass/ other vegetation and moves about on two le....oh...wait...kangaroos.
You do what is required for survival. But in general, eating people is a health risk. They must be cooked correctly and even then it's not 100% safe. ;)
All of Georgia's laughs are so forced, too. It's not even genuine amusement, just judgey fake laughs to imply someone else's stupidity. Disgusting.
Still trying to get the image of giggles eating ham, out of my head....bahaaaaa
You just know the lying bit@$ does. Lol
I would have used the c word but it implies warmth.
I guess I have an unpopular opinion but I really really really don't like this Morgan chick you are collaborating with. I don't know I just don't like her!