Thank you! This confirms what I have always maintained; that there are only two groups of people--those who know Jesus as Savior and those who need to know Him.
You guys are so funny on this channel. It’s 2023 and you are still ignoring the latest scientific information, and the very scriptures itself. It’s so sad how you mislead all who come to this channel just because you can’t accept the truth of the image that man was made in. To be black is something you just can’t accept.
It is so important to this man to say that the Ancient Egyptians were not Black. The Ancient Egyptians were Black Africans. The modern population of Egypt looks very different to the ancient population.
Even black Africans know that the ancient Egyptians were Caucasian. The DNA study of King Tut and forensic examination of Ramses II proves that. King Tut had the DNA marker most similar to Western Europeans and Ramses II had a caucasoid skull, facial features, and blonde hair!!! It was only due to massive immigration and race mixing of Nubian and other tribes in 700 BC, where after that the last couple of Pharaohs of one dynasty started to show Negroid features! Modern Egyptians show an admixture of black and Arab DNA along with the original Caucasian DNA. Please get your history straight!!!
@@Lionheart7190 if they were caucasian modern Egyptians would at least have some European DNA which they dont. Dont make me laugh. Egyptians are African, how the hell could the first egyptians be white in Africa where it is hot.
Of course an Afrocentrist got offended. He was referring to modern Egypt. Not all ancient Egyptians looked like Usain Bolt. North Africa has always been distinct from sub Sahara Africa to this day. Just like west Asia is different than east Asia. Cope.
Neanderthal was technically an ethnic group that mostly resembled European Caucasians and eventually mixed out of existence with different ethnicities!
@@Lionheart7190 Homo neanderthalensis are not Homo Sapiens, they are an earlier species that Homo Sapien both co-existed with, and mingled with in Europe. They're not simply just another ethnic group.
Nothing fits with the Biblical time line, nothing, we know this fable since the Bible was printed and its so sad that people with an esteemed education can come public and say such bs. you have no understanding at all .if only you knew how many civilizations far more advanced than us have existed in the far past ,yu would go crazy.
This video spent most time denying that races exist, contrary to what we can see. Denying the concept of race is PC virtue signalling, which makes me wonder; why would one want to please/join a group which is mostly atheist, and which subscribes to the LGBTQ agenda? Obfuscation, using genetics, is the main technique used to deny race. Using people of mixed race (Obama is, anthropologically speaking, a haptoon--50:50 mix) to deny race is dishonest. Many Egyptians are of mixed race. There are significant differences, besides skin colour. A search will soon reveal that average IQs of different races go from 60-65 for San, Pygmies, and Australian Aborigines to about 105 for North Eastern Asiatics. Sub-Saharan blacks are at about 70 and Europeans at about 95-100. This fully explains the past and present average intellectual achievements of the different groups. James Watson (co-discoverer of the structure of DNA) said he despaired over Africa for this reason, as there is no fix for this problem. This is a serious problem which is not mentioned because of PC. A problem denied can't be alleviated. The San is darker than Middle Easterners. I've worked with them in the Caprivi strip and in Tsumkwe as their doctor. I've also worked in Saudi Arabia for more than a year. The Khoi doesn't exist anymore. They've been absorbed by other local populations and some died out. Why would Crhistians propagate a lie and deny what is self-evident? Do they that much want to fit in?
It is complete PC, cultural Marxism, virtue signaling, pandering to the negroid race, and a complete denial of real world biological, chemical, and genetic facts! Only some alleged Christian groups (mainly liberal creationist groups) promulgate such lies when it comes to the reality of race within the human species!!!
Don’t listen to this liberal and cultural Marxist scientist who works for CMI, who believes there are no races and promotes racial amalgamation of all people!
The initial assumption that he derived his entire argument is inaccurate because the earth and the universe isn't a few thousand years old. It's actually billions of years old as supported by fossil dating of dinosaurs and old plants that is way older than a few thousand years old.
A lot of us are very skeptical of those dating methods. If you looking into it you find it is just more theory than proven science. Archeologists as a group are some of the most skeptical of evolution theory. King David's life was just a story but Archeologists have proven he exists in the past 50 years (just as an example) DNA science proves part of the Bible story as well. Then we have dinosaur mitochondria right out of their dug up bones... no way that survives as long as hundreds of thousands of years. The Bible describes 2 dinasours in man's time.. in job. There is much evidence proving the Bible true and over time man's theories fall. The only reason people want the earth to be "millions" of years old is to "prove" evolution is true. Evolution is just a theory and at best and really just grasping at straws.
@@imout671 No it's not. There're carbon 14 dating and cosmic age theories which definitively prove that the universe is way older than 6000 years old. If dinosaurs existed during man's time, then where did they all go in the span of a few thousand years?
@@MrWeezer55 "You know absolutely nothing about science." He appears to know something at least. "Also, King David existed in the past 50 years? I'm older than that!!!" Poor wording on his part. He's obviously saying that in the past 50 years, archaeologists have proven that King David existed.
"The initial assumption that he derived his entire argument is inaccurate because the earth and the universe isn't a few thousand years old." It's your initial assumption that is wrong. Your assumption is that a _competing_ view (the naturalistic one) is correct, and you are therefore judging his view by how well it fits with your view. But it's a _competing_ view, so of course it's not going to fit. "There're carbon 14 dating and cosmic age theories which definitively prove that the universe is way older than 6000 years old." A cosmic age "theory" does not prove anything. A theory is supposed to _explain_ a phenomenon, not _prove_ it. Further, science doesn't do proofs. Carbon 14 dating _assumes_ that the earth is older than 6000 years, and assumes no global flood. C14 dating is based on the rate of decay of C14 from an initial level when the living thing was alive. But that level has changed over history, so scientists need to have tables to show what it was at different points in history. Those tables do not take into account the global flood which would have drastically changed the levels. So to argue from a measurement that doesn't take the biblical history into account that the biblical history is wrong is actually a circular argument. Further, C14 dating actually _supports_ the biblical age when you take that into account. C14 cannot measure anything older than about 60,000+ years, as over that amount of time _all_ C14 would have decayed away. And yet coal and diamonds, supposedly _much_ older than 6000 years, have C14 in them, showing (if C14 works) that they are nowhere near as old as claimed. C14 has even been found in dinosaur bones, again showing that they are nowhere near as old as 65 million years, else there would be no C14 left to measure. "If dinosaurs existed during man's time, then where did they all go in the span of a few thousand years?" Like many creatures, they have become extinct. Nothing difficult about that.
The Quran is a garbage text that stole some things from the Torah and New Testament to make it appear somewhat truthful, but is merely the bogus philosophies of an Arab Warlord who tried to get the world to submit to his falsehoods!
I challenge you as the splits for Ham Shem and Japheth AB for Ham As A nor B haplo group descend into CT Yet CT make DE and CF! CF is all Japheth lines facts And DE are Shemites E1B1B proven arab and E1B1A Israelites My page Synthetic Sunday
Thank you! This confirms what I have always maintained; that there are only two groups of people--those who know Jesus as Savior and those who need to know Him.
I really enjoy these Origin shows. They are extremely informative and confirm the Bible. Thank you
Thank you for being lead by the Spirit to research and provide Amazing information. God continue to Bless you
This is extremely amazing. I really enjoyed this video. Thank you very much.
This does not add up in the haplo group mitochondrial eve migration from Africa.
Origins great show
21:40 look at Ashkenazi 🧬
@@gregorysymula4127 Synthetic Sunday only E1B1A Israelites with mtDNA L3
This is completely incorrect. Noah's arc and the tower of babel have been disproved by researchers. RUBBISH
Surprise, we're all related!
Only one race, different families.
You guys are so funny on this channel. It’s 2023 and you are still ignoring the latest scientific information, and the very scriptures itself. It’s so sad how you mislead all who come to this channel just because you can’t accept the truth of the image that man was made in. To be black is something you just can’t accept.
Man is not black, and black is not man. 😐😑😐
It is so important to this man to say that the Ancient Egyptians were not Black. The Ancient Egyptians were Black Africans. The modern population of Egypt looks very different to the ancient population.
Where are they were African biologically Africans
Even black Africans know that the ancient Egyptians were Caucasian. The DNA study of King Tut and forensic examination of Ramses II proves that. King Tut had the DNA marker most similar to Western Europeans and Ramses II had a caucasoid skull, facial features, and blonde hair!!! It was only due to massive immigration and race mixing of Nubian and other tribes in 700 BC, where after that the last couple of Pharaohs of one dynasty started to show Negroid features! Modern Egyptians show an admixture of black and Arab DNA along with the original Caucasian DNA. Please get your history straight!!!
@@Lionheart7190 if they were caucasian modern Egyptians would at least have some European DNA which they dont. Dont make me laugh. Egyptians are African, how the hell could the first egyptians be white in Africa where it is hot.
Sorry white-hater. Egyptians were NOT black.
Of course an Afrocentrist got offended. He was referring to modern Egypt.
Not all ancient Egyptians looked like Usain Bolt. North Africa has always been distinct from sub Sahara Africa to this day. Just like west Asia is different than east Asia. Cope.
If you spend 1 week with me, all you know you wish to forget.
Read jubilee it tells you.
How do we explain Neanderthal then?
Neanderthal was technically an ethnic group that mostly resembled European Caucasians and eventually mixed out of existence with different ethnicities!
@@Lionheart7190 Homo neanderthalensis are not Homo Sapiens, they are an earlier species that Homo Sapien both co-existed with, and mingled with in Europe. They're not simply just another ethnic group.
Adam was not the first man God created he was the last the other's was all ready here
so youre saying that all my black folks were born all around the earth and then invaded africa naw im not believing this
They not 'your' black ppl, they are just ppl. 😐😑😐👍
@@jamesking1495The original peoples of sub-Saharan Africa are what anthropologists consider negroid (or black) people!
You misunderstand. Likely in your genes.
@@SpaceDad42 ok thank you
Nothing fits with the Biblical time line, nothing, we know this fable since the Bible was printed and its so sad that people with an esteemed education can come public and say such bs. you have no understanding at all .if only you knew how many civilizations far more advanced than us have existed in the far past ,yu would go crazy.
You are going to find out the hard way.
This video spent most time denying that races exist, contrary to what we can see. Denying the concept of race is PC virtue signalling, which makes me wonder; why would one want to please/join a group which is mostly atheist, and which subscribes to the LGBTQ agenda?
Obfuscation, using genetics, is the main technique used to deny race.
Using people of mixed race (Obama is, anthropologically speaking, a haptoon--50:50 mix) to deny race is dishonest. Many Egyptians are of mixed race.
There are significant differences, besides skin colour. A search will soon reveal that average IQs of different races go from 60-65 for San, Pygmies, and Australian Aborigines to about 105 for North Eastern Asiatics. Sub-Saharan blacks are at about 70 and Europeans at about 95-100. This fully explains the past and present average intellectual achievements of the different groups. James Watson (co-discoverer of the structure of DNA) said he despaired over Africa for this reason, as there is no fix for this problem. This is a serious problem which is not mentioned because of PC. A problem denied can't be alleviated.
The San is darker than Middle Easterners. I've worked with them in the Caprivi strip and in Tsumkwe as their doctor. I've also worked in Saudi Arabia for more than a year. The Khoi doesn't exist anymore. They've been absorbed by other local populations and some died out.
Why would Crhistians propagate a lie and deny what is self-evident? Do they that much want to fit in?
It is complete PC, cultural Marxism, virtue signaling, pandering to the negroid race, and a complete denial of real world biological, chemical, and genetic facts! Only some alleged Christian groups (mainly liberal creationist groups) promulgate such lies when it comes to the reality of race within the human species!!!
God created all the races . He created four group
Don’t listen to this liberal and cultural Marxist scientist who works for CMI, who believes there are no races and promotes racial amalgamation of all people!
No, he created two people that had the genes to carry all of the traits we see today.
Yet here we are in 2020 screaming racism such ignorance
Just because race isn't something that's actually in nature doesn't mean the concept hasn't caused people to be harmed in our society
The initial assumption that he derived his entire argument is inaccurate because the earth and the universe isn't a few thousand years old. It's actually billions of years old as supported by fossil dating of dinosaurs and old plants that is way older than a few thousand years old.
A lot of us are very skeptical of those dating methods. If you looking into it you find it is just more theory than proven science. Archeologists as a group are some of the most skeptical of evolution theory. King David's life was just a story but Archeologists have proven he exists in the past 50 years (just as an example) DNA science proves part of the Bible story as well. Then we have dinosaur mitochondria right out of their dug up bones... no way that survives as long as hundreds of thousands of years. The Bible describes 2 dinasours in man's time.. in job. There is much evidence proving the Bible true and over time man's theories fall. The only reason people want the earth to be "millions" of years old is to "prove" evolution is true. Evolution is just a theory and at best and really just grasping at straws.
@@imout671 No it's not. There're carbon 14 dating and cosmic age theories which definitively prove that the universe is way older than 6000 years old. If dinosaurs existed during man's time, then where did they all go in the span of a few thousand years?
@@imout671 You know absolutely nothing about science. Also, King David existed in the past 50 years? I'm older than that!!!
@@MrWeezer55
"You know absolutely nothing about science."
He appears to know something at least.
"Also, King David existed in the past 50 years? I'm older than that!!!"
Poor wording on his part. He's obviously saying that in the past 50 years, archaeologists have proven that King David existed.
"The initial assumption that he derived his entire argument is inaccurate because the earth and the universe isn't a few thousand years old."
It's your initial assumption that is wrong. Your assumption is that a _competing_ view (the naturalistic one) is correct, and you are therefore judging his view by how well it fits with your view. But it's a _competing_ view, so of course it's not going to fit.
"There're carbon 14 dating and cosmic age theories which definitively prove that the universe is way older than 6000 years old."
A cosmic age "theory" does not prove anything. A theory is supposed to _explain_ a phenomenon, not _prove_ it. Further, science doesn't do proofs.
Carbon 14 dating _assumes_ that the earth is older than 6000 years, and assumes no global flood. C14 dating is based on the rate of decay of C14 from an initial level when the living thing was alive. But that level has changed over history, so scientists need to have tables to show what it was at different points in history. Those tables do not take into account the global flood which would have drastically changed the levels. So to argue from a measurement that doesn't take the biblical history into account that the biblical history is wrong is actually a circular argument.
Further, C14 dating actually _supports_ the biblical age when you take that into account. C14 cannot measure anything older than about 60,000+ years, as over that amount of time _all_ C14 would have decayed away. And yet coal and diamonds, supposedly _much_ older than 6000 years, have C14 in them, showing (if C14 works) that they are nowhere near as old as claimed. C14 has even been found in dinosaur bones, again showing that they are nowhere near as old as 65 million years, else there would be no C14 left to measure.
"If dinosaurs existed during man's time, then where did they all go in the span of a few thousand years?"
Like many creatures, they have become extinct. Nothing difficult about that.
What about the Quran
What about it ?
If you are African and you believe in the Quran then you are a fool. That is an awful book, very racist against dark skin people.
The Quran is a garbage text that stole some things from the Torah and New Testament to make it appear somewhat truthful, but is merely the bogus philosophies of an Arab Warlord who tried to get the world to submit to his falsehoods!
It is really Aramaic and early Christian works, the word Koran is actually Aramaic.
Which Quran? Lol
Y'all need to read about Prometheus creating Man and The story of Deucalion and Pyrrha and circle back on what this guy is saying in this video.
I challenge you as the splits for Ham Shem and Japheth
AB for Ham
As A nor B haplo group descend into CT
Yet CT make DE and CF!
CF is all Japheth lines facts
And DE are Shemites
E1B1B proven arab and E1B1A Israelites
My page Synthetic Sunday
The Black Irish.