Megasauropods Could Get Way Bigger Than We Thought

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 มิ.ย. 2024
  • What are the limits of terrestrial animal size, and did sauropod dinosaurs reach those limits? was the biggest land animal ever? While it was likely a sauropod dinosaur, is there a way to determine how big it was? This video combines months of research and assistance from sauropod paleontologists and biophysicists to calculate the size limits of sauropod dinosaurs, the biggest land animals in the history of the world. The biggest living thing, when it comes to land animals, would have been a sauropod dinosaur as big as a whale. Giant sauropods like Patagotitan, Argentinosaurus, Brachiosaurus, and the lost giants Fangorn and Maraapunisaurus are analyzed. Thank you to Arianna Harrington, Brian Curtice, Ray Wilhite, Mike Taylor, Matt Wedel, Brooks Britt, Rod Scheetz, Carrie Leavitt-Bussian, and Justin McKee for helping out with this months-long project.
    The SV-POW post that prompted it all: svpow.com/2023/02/06/the-ludi...
    Wilson, I. & Wilson, B. 2024. The Megasauropods: Using Intraquarry Size Variation and Histological Analogs to Predict Maximum Sauropod Body Sizes. Utah Conference for Undergraduate Research 2024 Program. Utah Valley University.
    Supplementary Information Link: drive.google.com/drive/u/0/fo...
    Background Image by rawpixel.com on Freepik
    Thumbnail art by Nobu Tamura
    Music from #Uppbeat (free for Creators!):
    uppbeat.io/t/zimpzon/meditation
    License code: XSY4C83POJ84NMSH
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @thevividen
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 281

  • @TheVividen
    @TheVividen  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +67

    References:
    Benson, R.B.J., Hunt, G., Carrano, M.T. & Campione, N. 2018, Cope's rule and the adaptive landscape of dinosaur body size evolution. Palaeontology, 61: 13-48. doi.org/10.1111/pala.12329
    Burness, G.P. & Flannery, T. 2001. Dinosaurs, Dragonslayer, and Dwarfs: The Evolution of Maximal Body Size. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(25): 14518-14523.
    Campione, N.E., & Evans, D.C. 2012. A universal scaling relationship between body mass and proximal limb bone dimensions in quadrupedal terrestrial tetrapods. BMC Biol 10, 60.
    doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-10-60
    Campione, N.E. & Evans, D.C. 2020. The accuracy and precision of body mass estimation in non-avian dinosaurs. Biol Rev, 95: 1759-1797. doi.org/10.1111/brv.12638
    Carballido, J.L., Diego, P., Otero., A., Cerda, I. A., Salgado, L., Garrido, A.C., Ramezani, J., Cúneo, N.R. & Krause, J.M. 2017. A new giant titanosaur sheds light on body mass evolution among
    sauropod dinosaurs. Proc. R. Soc. B.2842017121920171219. doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.1219
    Carpenter, K. 2018. Maraapunisaurus fragillimus, N.G. (formerly Amphicoelias fragillimus), a basal Rebbachisaurid from the Morrison Formation (Upper Jurassic) of Colorado: Geology of the
    Intermountain West 5 p. 227-244. doi:10.31711/giw.v5.pp227-244
    Curtice, B. 2021. NEW DRY MESA DINOSAUR QUARRY SUPERSAURUS VIVIANAE (JENSEN 1985) AXIAL ELEMENTS PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INSIGHT INTO ITS PHYLOGENETIC
    RELATIONSHIPS AND SIZE, SUGGESTING AN ANIMAL THAT EXCEEDED 39 METERS IN LENGTH. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 2021 Virtual Meeting Conference Program: p 92.
    D’Emic, M.D. 2023. The evolution of maximum terrestrial body mass in sauropod dinosaurs. Current Biology 33:9. doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2023.02.067
    Hokkanen, J.E.I. 1985. The Size of the Largest Land Animal. Department of Theoretical Physics, University of Helsinki. Siltavuorenpenger 20, SF-00170 Helsinki 17, Finland.
    Néraudeau, D., Allain, R., Ballèvre, M., Batten, D.J., Buffetaut, E., Colin, J.P., Dabard, M.P., Daviero-Gomez, V., El Albani, A., Gomez, B., Grosheny, D., Le Lœuff, J., Leprince, A.,
    Martín-Closas, C., Masure, E., Mazin, J.M., Philippe, M., Pouech, J., Tong, H., Tournepiche, J.F., & Vullo, R. 2012. The Hauterivian-Barremian lignitic bone bed of Angeac (Charente, south-west
    France): stratigraphical, palaeobiological and palaeogeographical implications, Cretaceous Research 37 pp 1-14 doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2012.01.006
    Fowler, D.W. & Sullivan, R.M. 2011. The first giant titanosaurian sauropod from the Upper Cretaceous of North America. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 56 (4),
    685-690 doi: dx.doi.org/10.4202/app.2010.0105
    González-Riga, B..J, Lamanna M.C., Ortiz D.L.D., Calvo, J.O., & Coria, J.P. 2016. A gigantic new dinosaur from Argentina and the evolution of the sauropod hind foot.
    Sci Rep. 18;6:19165. doi:10.1038/srep19165.
    Holtz, T.R. Jr. 2012. Dinosaurs: The Most Complete, Up-to-Date Encyclopedia for Dinosaur Lovers of All Ages, Winter 2011 Appendix.
    Holtz, T.R. Jr. 2014. Supplementary Information to Dinosaurs: The Most Complete, Up-to-Date Encyclopedia for Dinosaur Lovers of All Ages. Random House.
    Janensch, W. 1914."Übersicht über der Wirbeltierfauna der Tendaguru-Schichten nebst einer kurzen Charakterisierung der neu aufgeführten Arten von Sauropoden.
    Archiv für Biontologie. 3 (1): 81-110.
    Mazzetta, G.V., Christiansen, P., & Farina, R.A. 2004. Giants and Bizarres: Body Size of Some Southern South American Cretaceous Dinosaurs. Historical Biology 1-13.
    www.miketaylor.org.uk/tmp/papers/Mazzetta-et-al_04_SA-dino-body-size.pdf
    Molina-Pérez, R., Larramendi, A., Atuchin, A., Mazzei, S., & Donaghey, J. 2020. Dinosaur facts and figures: The sauropods and other sauropodomorphs. Princeton University Press.
    Novas, F.E., Salgado, L., Calvo, J., & Agnolin, F. 2005. Giant titanosaur (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia. Revista del Museo Argentina de Ciencas Naturales 7: 37-1
    Osborn, H.F. 1924. Sauropoda and Theropoda from the Lower Cretaceous of Mongolia. American Museum Novitates. 128: 1-7
    Otero, A., José L. Carballido, J.L. & Agustín, P.M. 2020. The Appendicular Osteology of Patagotitan Mayorum (Dinosauria, Sauropoda), Journal of Vertebrate
    Paleontology, 40:4, DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2020.1793158
    Pal, S. & Ayyasami, K. 2022, The lost titan of Cauvery. Geology Today, 38: 112-116. doi.org/10.1111/gto.12390
    Paul, G. S. 2016. The Princeton Field Guide to Dinosaurs. Princeton University Press. p. 227
    Paul, G.S. 2019. Determining the Largest Known Land Animal: A Critical Comparison of Differing Methods For Restoring the Volume and Mass of Extinct Animals. Annals of
    Carnegie Museum 85, 4: 335-358.
    Paul, G.S & Larramendi, A. 2023. Body mass estimate of Bruhathkayosaurus and other fragmentary sauropod remains suggest the largest land animals were about as big as the
    greatest whales. Lethaia, 56: 2 pp 1-1.
    Riggs, E.S. 1903. Brachiosaurus altithorax: the largest known Dinosaur. AMSS 4:15. 299-306.
    Sander, P.l & Klein, N. 2006. Developmental Plasticity in the Life History of a Prosauropod Dinosaur. Science (New York, N.Y.). 310. 1800-2. 10.1126/science.1120125.
    Sander, P., Klein, N., Stein, K., & Wings, O. 2011. Sauropod bone histology and its implications for sauropod biology.
    Tykoski, R.S. & Fiorillo, A.R. 2017. An articulated cervical series of Alamosaurus sanjuanensis Gilmore, 1922 (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from Texas: new perspective on the
    relationships of North America's last giant sauropod, Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 15:5, 339-364, DOI: 10.1080/14772019.2016.1183150
    von Huene, F. 1929. Los saurisquios y ornitisquios del Cretáceo Argentino. Anales del Museo de La Plata (series 3) 3: 1-196.
    Wilhite, R. 1999. Ontogenetic Variation in the Appendicular Skeleton of the Genus Camarasaurus. N.p.: Brigham Young University Department of Geology.
    Wilson M.J. & Allain, R. 2015.. Osteology of Rebbachisaurus garasbae Lavocat, 1954, a Diplodocoid (Dinosauria, Sauropoda) from the Early Late Cretaceous-Aged Kem Kem Beds of
    Southeastern Morocco. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 10.1080/02724634.2014.1000701.
    Yadagiri, P. & Ayyasami, K. 1987. A carnosaurian dinosaur from the Kallamedu Formation (Maestrichtian horizon), Tamilnadu. In M.V.A. Sastry, V.V. Sastry, C.G.K. Ramanujam,
    H.M. Kapoor, B.R. Jagannatha Rao, P.P. Satsangi, and U.B. Mathur (eds.), Three Decades of Development in Palaeontology and Stratigraphy in India. Volume 1. Precambrian to
    Mesozoic. Geological Society of India Special Publication, 11(1): 523-528.

    • @cretaceouscrusader661
      @cretaceouscrusader661 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      When your reference list is an essay of it's own.

    • @bondrewedthesoverignofdawn1477
      @bondrewedthesoverignofdawn1477 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Well done man! Referencing stuff already is very annoying and a lot of TH-camrs don't do that. You are doing incredible job going the extra mile

    • @enderman_of_d00m24
      @enderman_of_d00m24 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      how big would a theoretical Sauropod have to be to feed from a Giant Sequoia?

    • @PrehistoricMagazine
      @PrehistoricMagazine 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Your reference list far outdoes my TH-cam videos. Nice job with everything. Mike

    • @Circe-nx5zs
      @Circe-nx5zs 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Interesting and informative video! One thing I am curious about is whether the Argentinosaurus specimens currently available are full grown or subadults. If they were subadults, would it be possible to then use known growth rates of other sauropods to estimate how much growing the specimens had left and therefore how big they would have been fully grown?

  • @dinosauroiddude
    @dinosauroiddude 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +453

    2030: The True Size Of Gigachadotitanospondylosaurus

    • @dinosauroiddude
      @dinosauroiddude 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

      (1500 Tonnes)

    • @dragonfox2.058
      @dragonfox2.058 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@dinosauroiddude And whaddya get? another day older and deeper in debt....

    • @Dinoramascuplts-Tyrex
      @Dinoramascuplts-Tyrex 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Best part is, that name is fully possible.

    • @CalvinTheCarnotaurus
      @CalvinTheCarnotaurus 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      New estimate in 2040 says it weighs 1827363617183836271838469173.2 metric tons.

    • @vergil2218
      @vergil2218 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      That size is ♾️

  • @Mikailodon
    @Mikailodon 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +176

    The largest sauropod, whatever it was, would've been a walking mountain among the walking mountains that are sauropods. Would literally be a real life kaiju. Great video and calculations!

    • @pierre-samuelroux9364
      @pierre-samuelroux9364 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We know it bruh it argent

    • @Turkeynuggies
      @Turkeynuggies 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

      @@pierre-samuelroux9364 argentinosaurus is the largest we KNOW of, there could be way larger ones we have not discovered yet, Sauropods don't fossilize well from what we can tell.

    • @pierre-samuelroux9364
      @pierre-samuelroux9364 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Turkeynuggies oh

    • @jackstraw4222
      @jackstraw4222 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      keep in mind that brachiosaurus displayed both around chicago and other places is a sub adult...and so is the Berlin specimen...isolated bones could reach 7ft in larger specimens and there photos to show this...

    • @gandalfthewhite.5245
      @gandalfthewhite.5245 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@pierre-samuelroux9364argentinosaurus is the largest defined species that we KNOW OF

  • @Cassave78
    @Cassave78 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +151

    Now this puts the "Titan" in "Titanosaurs". I don't think we will ever be able to comprehend how gigantic a max sized sauropod could possibly have been

    • @RandomMackem3247
      @RandomMackem3247 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Until we invent time travel

    • @RaylonDoughty
      @RaylonDoughty 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      We just need to get more reasearch and find more skeletons

    • @tylerlogan4747
      @tylerlogan4747 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      You could never get that off of fossils , remember they are rare and you would be lucky to get a creature in the top 70%

    • @loowick4074
      @loowick4074 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      The fossilisation bias usually means that most fossils would be of smaller and younger animals.
      I think a more accurate size can be obtained if we determined how big of a sauropod can an environment support.
      50 ton sauropods can live in herds.
      But truly gigantic sauropods would be solitary as no force on earth would be able to hunt them.
      Like even if humans existed they couldn't harm large sauropods until the late feudal age.

    • @diegoquezada3193
      @diegoquezada3193 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@loowick4074 I mean pitfalls exist, and for such a large animal to lose its footing or stumble and fall down would be a death sentence although due to their immense size I doubt early humans would actually try messing with adults.

  • @Zveebo
    @Zveebo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

    Really interesting research. Can’t wait to watch the EDGE version of this next week.

    • @RandomCrapIUpload
      @RandomCrapIUpload 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      It'll have the exact same transcript but only slightly altered

    • @knowncoralconsumer
      @knowncoralconsumer 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      @@RandomCrapIUpload lol fr

    • @Kurotitan7125
      @Kurotitan7125 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      It'll just be plagiarized

  • @countchompula1896
    @countchompula1896 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +30

    This might be an unpopular opinion but I think Sauroposeidon is criminally underrated. The tallest noodle neck of them all. 🦕

    • @hrishikeshnair586
      @hrishikeshnair586 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Also the coolest name of any dinosaur.

    • @jackstraw4222
      @jackstraw4222 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      highest estimate for it was 65ft height 100ft long...some lower estimates put it at 50ft high ...

    • @countchompula1896
      @countchompula1896 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jackstraw4222 Really? The highest I saw was 67ft high and 112ft long.

    • @TheWigglergler
      @TheWigglergler 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It's extremely difficult to know exactly how tall a given sauropod was, given how heavily that relies on neck posture. The idea that it was the tallest is based on a vertical head posture like Brachiosaurus, but we don't know for sure which sauropods were capable of that or not. In addition, even with a less angled head posture, the absolute largest megasauropods may have been taller. We just can't know for sure.

  • @alienstar2088
    @alienstar2088 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    It will never cease to amaze me how these creatures actually existed. It feels like a fantastical group of creatures and they are but, to just imagine their existence boggles my mind sometimes on the scale and success of these animals.

  • @k7l3rworkman97
    @k7l3rworkman97 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    I want to be a paleontologist so bad… I’ve wanted to ever since I was a child, but I’m now 30 and never went to college (couldn’t afford it) and pretty much barely made it out of highschool

    • @TheMrcassina
      @TheMrcassina 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I am sorry for you man

    • @Paleofaktus-ux7kh
      @Paleofaktus-ux7kh 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Its the same for me.

    • @josh26566
      @josh26566 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Become a paleoartist. It's basically being a paleontologist minus the mandatory degree!

    • @ludwigiapilosa508
      @ludwigiapilosa508 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Volunteering at the right place can get you almost there.

    • @DarkDraconX1
      @DarkDraconX1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very familiar

  • @PrehistoricRager
    @PrehistoricRager 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    As years pass, we discover even more stuff that show how successful dinosaurs and other prehistoric animals can be. Who knows what we will discover about Sauropods in the future, but that will be ready to grace us with more information about these titans. What a great video!

  • @Starbright_
    @Starbright_ 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +43

    Imagine how thicc a hypothetical 600 ton creature would be.

    • @sangheiliwarrior86
      @sangheiliwarrior86 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Look up "broome titanosaur".

    • @treystephens6166
      @treystephens6166 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      GODZILLA is about 800 Tons‼️

    • @mikerude5073
      @mikerude5073 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      @@treystephens6166 Depends which version, and likely what is depicted in the movies, even Minus One, would weigh a lot more than that. The square cube law is brutal, I'm not sure who estimated 800 tons, because he'd need to be a lot heavier than that.

    • @treystephens6166
      @treystephens6166 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@mikerude5073 I think He was supposed to be 800 Tons in GODZILLA (1984) 🇯🇵

    • @chickenstandingonthegrass3610
      @chickenstandingonthegrass3610 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      modern godzillas are in the double digits of thousands of tons, but I wouldn't be surprised if one godzilla was 800

  • @soudino2723
    @soudino2723 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    nice video, would be insane to find a sauropod one day that is over 200 tons, i have a question, do you believe aust colossus could be a real genus of ichthyosaur?

    • @frost7463
      @frost7463 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      The aust colossus is objectively a real genus of ichthyosaur (or species of an already existing genus). The size is just uncertain.

  • @kaiplaygame6808
    @kaiplaygame6808 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    yooo congrats on presenting this at the conference that’s gigantic and amazing feat

  • @frankdughtank8327
    @frankdughtank8327 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Love these type of videos!

  • @PrehistoricMagazine
    @PrehistoricMagazine 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    Been waiting for your next video. Thanks for what you do. Mike from Prehistoric Magazine

    • @TheVividen
      @TheVividen  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Thank you, Mike!

    • @user-rw4yi2xw5i
      @user-rw4yi2xw5i 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@TheVividen hi 👋,why in restorations big sauropods and other dinosaurs include tyrannosaurus no Robert Wadlow? either tallest human ever is too big or theropod and other dinosaurs won't seem big anymore.

  • @abdulazizrex
    @abdulazizrex 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    1:57, that is incredible!

  • @michaeljdauben
    @michaeljdauben 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Fascinating video. Megasauropods are a fascinating subject and your discussion of biomechanics, evolution and ecosystem limits present an interesting look at sauropod sizes.

  • @pedroroque829
    @pedroroque829 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    No matter how large those estimates are, i don't think any animal will beat the weight of the 33m blue whales from the 20th century, 250 tonnes.

  • @pseudonymoussnow4589
    @pseudonymoussnow4589 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Truly great work.

  • @catstampsgaming3476
    @catstampsgaming3476 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Really amazing research! That was interesting to hear theoretically that sauropods could grow that large!

  • @archosaur_enjoyer824
    @archosaur_enjoyer824 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

    A 600 ton sauropod would be extremely shocking yet totally bs

    • @wildlifeisthewealthofnatur5457
      @wildlifeisthewealthofnatur5457 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      150 tonnes is the maximum estimated weight of any land creature. Seismosaurus, Maarapunisaurus, Bruhathkayosaurus estimations are even larger than Argentinasaurus.

    • @BaldianOfIbelin
      @BaldianOfIbelin 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      I'm sure we said the same thing when we discovered the first sauropods.
      "It is not possible that something so heavy could walk on land. Surely everyone walked in swamps to be able to carry their weight."
      We certainly do not fully understand the biological limits for size in animals every time we think that yes, something changes that thought.

    • @thureintun1687
      @thureintun1687 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@BaldianOfIbelinyou also like to say similar about technology, right? And about physics too?
      You'd love to say statement like:
      "We thought flying is impossible " ... huh?
      I'm sick of comings across members of general public keep disclaiming that , like its a natural flow of humans to wrong , only then right...
      Melodrama....
      Yes, there are things that changed our initial prediction. BUT there are much more things that stay as laws of nature.
      We've come so far in our observational capabilities and equipments that theorising something wrong is becoming more and more slim. Not like we'll never fail to realised a true nature of something. Of cuz misinterpretation and etc. could happen thru the future. But not like it's happening all the time. We literally put couple giant telescopes at the lagrange point, and we've built a town sized particle accelerator too!
      Please don't tell me you believe we will one day able to push matters into faster than light speed ... PLEASE im begging you.
      Also id like to ask one thing: what is the probability of us human realising the true nature of something at initial observation/ experiment/ field test/ etc. ?
      Or do you out right believe truth itself is changing !!?? 😮😮
      O my

    • @BaldianOfIbelin
      @BaldianOfIbelin 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@thureintun1687 Obviously there are limits to everything, I never said there wouldn't be one.

  • @abdulazizrex
    @abdulazizrex 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And this is why I’m a subscriber!

  • @chrisrandom1404
    @chrisrandom1404 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome video as always good sir.

  • @robertsansone1680
    @robertsansone1680 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very interesting. Thank You

  • @RosalinaDeAnda
    @RosalinaDeAnda 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Amazing. Sauropods are fascinating animals that lived millions of years ago and got to VERY LARGE sizes. The estimates in the video (Based on what I think) are very believable (For now, anything can change). I have been trying to calculate the size for Sauropods for around a year (I'm not a Paleontologist yet, but, I can still do stuff like this), I personally think people should also consider the fact that Sauropods might have gotten so large due to other Sauropods competing. This doesn't apply to all Sauropods, but it's still possible, Theropods and other non-Sauropod Dinosurs are mainly the reason why Sauropods grew to these sizes. Finally, I love your work and I hope you have a good day.

  • @marcstevens5871
    @marcstevens5871 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I'd like to imagine the upper sizes of the largest birds and crocodile and compared to their average species sizes would be just about as close to the proportional maximums for dinosaur genera, so I'm referring to proportions like that of Gustave compared to an average Nile crodile being possible for any dinosaurs given perfect conditions.
    Anyways, your video was amazing, the presentation and explanations were great and easy to understand, 10/10 video, would watch again

  • @maozilla9149
    @maozilla9149 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    incredible video

  • @chunkykong01
    @chunkykong01 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you for this video. I absolutley love sauropods

  • @tomasfaria4974
    @tomasfaria4974 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wish I could give you money, so much hard work for a 7:24 minute video. Sadly all I can give is my appreciation and watching the ads, so thank you

    • @TheVividen
      @TheVividen  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I appreciate it! Thank you!

  • @MrBlobhunter
    @MrBlobhunter หลายเดือนก่อน

    Love the science u do😄

  • @doragonzx
    @doragonzx 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

    Honestly this make me curious on how large a Megatheropod can get.
    And I'm waiting for the day Ark titanosaur become Paleoaccurate

    • @LazyOldFusspot_3428
      @LazyOldFusspot_3428 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Just wait for a megaceratopsian 💀

    • @rodrigopinto6676
      @rodrigopinto6676 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      T. rex is the biggest of course .!

    • @yissibiiyte
      @yissibiiyte 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@rodrigopinto6676 that we know of. It's highly unlikely that we just so happened to discover THE largest species ever

    • @rodrigopinto6676
      @rodrigopinto6676 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@yissibiiyte the T. rex is the maximum limit of the large theropods.

    • @yissibiiyte
      @yissibiiyte 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@rodrigopinto6676 according to which studies? I'm sure a charcharodontosaurid could theoretically evolve to become bulkier. Gven it's already taller and longer than a rex, if it bulked up it could become heavier.

  • @superiorcybergodzilla5670
    @superiorcybergodzilla5670 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Interesting 😮

  • @enderman_of_d00m24
    @enderman_of_d00m24 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Someone named a Sauropod Fangorn! Yes!

  • @ludwigiapilosa508
    @ludwigiapilosa508 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Imagine the farts from such an animal. Probably enough to knock you down and make you deaf.

  • @ricopaulson1
    @ricopaulson1 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Speaking of Camarasaurs I got to view some of their trackways this weekend. Diplodocus and Allosaurus as well. It was rad. I have a lot of cool morrison foundation sites near me.

  • @beedrillbot121
    @beedrillbot121 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Why hasn’t there been a Kaiju movie that uses Sauropods as the main stars. It seems like a massive missed opportunity.

    • @user-gr1io9is3v
      @user-gr1io9is3v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      to be fair godzilla moggs even 600 tons sauropods, he weight about 100 000 tons

    • @user-gr1io9is3v
      @user-gr1io9is3v 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      to be fair godzilla moggs even 600 tons sauropods, he weight about 100 000 tons

  • @David-ni5hj
    @David-ni5hj 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Could you do a video about how much would dinosaurs weigh if they were as massive as mammals??? That's quite an unexplored topic

  • @SamuRhino2023
    @SamuRhino2023 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Any news on the Bertha Rex? I like my C H O N K E R Tyrannosaurus. Also, I saw the size difference between the ‘Leviathan’ Saurophaganax size an the average Snax. I then applied the same logic to a Tyrannosaurus (doubling weight estimates) and found that at the very least, using this method gives you an animal around 15-16 tones. But if you double the bigger estimates, you can get a 20+ tonne animal. How cool is that? A tyrannosaurus that rivals paleoloxodon in size!

    • @r.k845
      @r.k845 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The bigger estimates are the larger than average animals.
      There was literally a paper last year that makes it clear T.Rex maximum theoretical is around 15-16 tons.
      Still huge.

    • @RosalinaDeAnda
      @RosalinaDeAnda 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Amazing, I personally believe that Tyrannosaurus Rex (Maybe even the whole Tyrannosarus genus since THERE HAD TO BE another species of Tyrannosaurus) could have reached a maximum size of 13 or so tonnes. I got these results by looking at previous Tyrannosaurus estimates, then looking at the anatomy of Tyrannosaurus. I also looked at Tyrannosauru's ecology, I then looked at many Tyrannosaurus Rex specimen's femur circumference. @r.k845 "T.Rex maximum theoretical is around 15-16 tons" is a amazing response since bipeds like Theropods can only support so much weight, while quadrupeds like most Sauropods and Elephantidae, can support their weight thanks to their four legs and many more reasons. @SamuRhino2023, I'm not saying your wrong, I'm just sharing my personal thoughts and opinions, you did something good.

    • @SamuRhino2023
      @SamuRhino2023 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @r.k845 “Theoretical maximum”. Like he says in this video, it’s foolish to think we’ve found the largest specimens of any extinct taxon.

    • @r.k845
      @r.k845 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SamuRhino2023 The common Rex is around 9 tons. The largest discovered is 12 tons. The largest in theory is 16.
      Makes sense.

    • @SamuRhino2023
      @SamuRhino2023 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @r.k845 I know, and it does. But theropod sizes can be questioned a lot more lately mainly because of a Saurophaganax specimen that was double the size it was supposed to be. So a Rex bigger than 16 tons is likely I’d say, but not common. And a Rex that big likely would have different proportions and would lack in speed and agility in comparison to the smaller estimates. Most Rexes were between 8-10 tons yes, but the larger sizes are not only fun to think about, but very well a possibility. I’m not saying they could get Argentinosaurus sized, lol that’s just silly.

  • @user-rw4yi2xw5i
    @user-rw4yi2xw5i 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I want a video about the theoretical maximum height from ground to head for the tallest sauropods

  • @andrewhunter6536
    @andrewhunter6536 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Could you not fit a Gaussian or skewed distribution to the mammals at least and use that to find the 1:1000 specimen or whatever standard deviation you pick as likely to have occurred? I don’t know the distribution so maybe there is something difficult with a power law tail or something

  • @dragonfox2.058
    @dragonfox2.058 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼good for you!!! 🎉

  • @majnuker
    @majnuker 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Love James Gurney, but look up Todd Marshall for some great Paleo-Art!

  • @nexusoflife
    @nexusoflife 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What body plan would a 600 tonne land animal use? Something slug like, with many culumnar legs underneath?

  • @jpintero6330
    @jpintero6330 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cool.

  • @ferociousrazordino3581
    @ferociousrazordino3581 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    if fangorn specimen was as large as the higher bound estimates, then i think it would be "possible" to get somewhat close to that 600 t mark though probably not quite reaching it. We have limited resources though, unfortunately. This is not only a problem with extinct animals though, even MODERN animals we are limited on what we know as the max size for them. Many "max" accounts for modern animals are unreliable records, making doing the same for extinct animals even worse.

    • @user-rw4yi2xw5i
      @user-rw4yi2xw5i หลายเดือนก่อน

      Also only 0,1% or less of all animals including sauropods and other living organisms ever existed can be discovered

  • @blacknoir8504
    @blacknoir8504 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Any news about Bertha?

  • @rubric-eo5yj
    @rubric-eo5yj 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    sorry i am quite late so my question is if the largest hypothetical mass for a land animal is 600 tonnes what would be the largest hypothetical size for a sea creature i dont know something like 1000 tonnes ?

  • @MichZilla90
    @MichZilla90 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Man seeing a big dog outside is scary enough

  • @DangerousFacts48
    @DangerousFacts48 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    *_Absolute Unit_*

  • @SpinoAnimationsYT
    @SpinoAnimationsYT 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Godzilla Update Is Getting Closer…

  • @kampfer91
    @kampfer91 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Imagine how big the quake you gonna feel even from afar when these giants walk from a distance , i wonder can we even stand properly at close proximity .

  • @niharg2011
    @niharg2011 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wait Bruhathkayosaurus is now referred as Fangorn now?

  • @thedoruk6324
    @thedoruk6324 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    @TheVividen what is your thoughts about the infamous indian sauropod called Bruhathkayosaurus. There were news about it that could suprass even argentinasaurus itself. Is that true ? Or possible ?

    • @r.k845
      @r.k845 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      He already discussed this

    • @user-rw4yi2xw5i
      @user-rw4yi2xw5i หลายเดือนก่อน

      Is true because Molina Perez and Paul estimate that average mass body of bruhathkayosaurus is 110-130 tons,while average body mass of argentinosaurus is 75 tons

    • @thedoruk6324
      @thedoruk6324 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-rw4yi2xw5i thanks!

  • @yissibiiyte
    @yissibiiyte 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    An off-shoot of this question: How big could a sauropod get ecologically speaking? As in what would the size limit be before the animal starts starving to death

    • @quakethedoombringer
      @quakethedoombringer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I guess it also depends on terrains and food source, but I would guess the maximum upper limit would be around less than 70 meters and approximately 90 metric ton. Go higher than that and I think the poor dino would collapse under its own weight (square cube law) before it could even starve to death

    • @juliusfucik4011
      @juliusfucik4011 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I don't know how much such a creature would need to eat, but let's say it is 5% of its body mass per day. Now, a 600 ton animal would need to eat 30 tons. Assuming a density of 1 ton per cubic meter (basically water), the upper bound for the volume of food would be 30 cubic meters. Or let's make it an even 27, such that it would be a 3x3x3 m cube of food.
      Now, that sounds like a lot, but if you have ever removed weeds from a garden, you will find you will easily remove a cubic meter per 2-3 weeks from even a small garden.
      I think the problem would not really be the available biomass, but it would more likely be the required time to chew and swallow 30 cubic meters of vegetation
      per day. You would be eating non stop, I guess.

  • @maxdepasquale2351
    @maxdepasquale2351 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting, great and patient work, thank you.
    I am no palaeontology expert, however... I think it is not unreasonable to assume that the biggest Sauropod specimens could reach 100 tons. Which is stil staggering.

    • @jackstraw4222
      @jackstraw4222 หลายเดือนก่อน

      but things can be heavier in the ocean no matter how big they get on land...thats why i still am holding out for even bigger marine reptiles to be found....im aware of the huge 3m long pliosaur skull in oxford...

    • @francissemyon7971
      @francissemyon7971 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jackstraw4222 The Oxford jaws are probably over-reconstructed.

  • @Mei23448
    @Mei23448 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    0:26 very big

  • @Bagnel
    @Bagnel 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gigasauropod dreading the next spinosaurus update

  • @helly.Jelly787
    @helly.Jelly787 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was just rewatching the first part of this 😂

  • @gandalfthewhite.5245
    @gandalfthewhite.5245 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Godzilla seems more and more realistic every day.

  • @ZombieSlayer-dj3wb
    @ZombieSlayer-dj3wb 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wonder if age would be a factor to

  • @tyrannotherium7873
    @tyrannotherium7873 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who knows only we know is that sauropods obviously are the largest land animals ever to walk the Earth and they are majestic animals if there were alive today

  • @SeverinHawkland7855
    @SeverinHawkland7855 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    How large do you think Pterosaurs could theoretically get?

    • @k7l3rworkman97
      @k7l3rworkman97 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Check out Quetzoquatalus (the Pterosaurs basically the size of a small plane

    • @lucaricci1987
      @lucaricci1987 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Quetzalcoatlus and other Azdarchids are the largest, but they’d weigh far less than even Tyrannosaurs at the maximum, one T.rex arm weighs 500 lbs about as much as the average Quetzalcoatlus

    • @SeverinHawkland7855
      @SeverinHawkland7855 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@k7l3rworkman97 I'm not talking about how large they did get, but how large they could get. So, before their muscles, bones, or wings aren't strong enough to keep them up, or to take off from the ground. The theoretical, physiological limit.

    • @yissibiiyte
      @yissibiiyte 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The large azdharchids like quetzalcoatlus and hatzegopteryx seem to already be at the limit. Any larger and they would need larger muscles to take off, which would make them heavier, which would require more muscles, and the domino effect continues.

    • @SeverinHawkland7855
      @SeverinHawkland7855 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yissibiiyte I'd think the limit was more, considering that domino effect is the reason they walk (and take off) with their wings.

  • @jadesea562
    @jadesea562 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    its over nine-thousand!!!!

  • @aldrinmilespartosa1578
    @aldrinmilespartosa1578 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We may not have dragons, but what we have, or what he once have, is equally as cool, lol.

  • @PrehistoricMagazine
    @PrehistoricMagazine 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If we did find sauropods that big then maybe theropods in that area would have been bigger to. Mike

  • @jinchuriki26
    @jinchuriki26 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That Bruhsomething saur could potentially average 120 tons if it turns out to be a real dinosaur I guess? Also any news on thicc Bertha?

  • @dougsinthailand7176
    @dougsinthailand7176 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interestingly elephants make almost no sound when walking. Their mass can’t stand the shock apparently.

  • @hyrumhanson3390
    @hyrumhanson3390 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Digestive tracks tent to become more efficient with size, one wonders if the largest could eat trees.

  • @subnombre
    @subnombre 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    and then there are humans with Tanks from 188 to 1000 tons and submarines of almost 50,000 tons.

    • @yissibiiyte
      @yissibiiyte 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Metal moment

    • @ShoaibMalik-un1gu
      @ShoaibMalik-un1gu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What tank weighs 1000 tons? Are you referring to railway guns?

    • @subnombre
      @subnombre 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@ShoaibMalik-un1gu p 1000 ratte solos Dinosaurs

    • @ShoaibMalik-un1gu
      @ShoaibMalik-un1gu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@subnombre I thought you were refering to ones that actually existed /:

    • @subnombre
      @subnombre 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@ShoaibMalik-un1gu Even without that tank, the largest one weighs 188 tons.....

  • @JoMcMullen
    @JoMcMullen 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So certain kaiju can exist like rodan and the skull crawler

  • @michaelhamar3305
    @michaelhamar3305 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    so godzilla is possible

  • @MonsterZilla452
    @MonsterZilla452 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    145 tonnes is enough for the max sized Argentinosaurus even it's way above the biggest discovered specimen that's 85 tonnes

  • @jessehutchings
    @jessehutchings 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A question as old as the dinosaurs

  • @k7l3rworkman97
    @k7l3rworkman97 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wait… what about Drednaughtus ? (I probably butchered the spelling)
    Is Argentinasaurus bigger than a Dred?

    • @frost7463
      @frost7463 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Argentinosaurus is much larger than Dreadnaughtus

    • @yissibiiyte
      @yissibiiyte 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      As is the norm with titanosaurs, dreadnoughtus' remains are too fragmentary to make reliable estimates.

    • @Ozraptor4
      @Ozraptor4 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@yissibiiyte Dreadnoughtus has one of the most complete skeletons of any giant titanosaur, accounting for 70.4% of the postcranial elements.

    • @yissibiiyte
      @yissibiiyte 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Ozraptor4 I stand corrected. It is still smaller than argentinosaurus though

    • @szodoss7764
      @szodoss7764 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Of course ..
      Much bigger !!
      You just have to compare their fossilis, much bigger is that of argentinosaurus..
      Dreadnoughtus is overhyped/overrated, maybe because it's skeleton is more complete.

  • @badabing3391
    @badabing3391 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    we will probably never see the skeleton of those larger sauropods with a some sort of hormone defect that caused it to grow big enough to cause organ failure

  • @dougsinthailand7176
    @dougsinthailand7176 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Skeptical. What would it even eat and it probably wouldn’t be able to afford to stop eating. Has anyone ever looked at its calorie requirement?

  • @ahmedshaharyarejaz9886
    @ahmedshaharyarejaz9886 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But could it defeat the Shapeshifting Spinosaurus?

  • @shadowlord4649
    @shadowlord4649 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All we need mext is a real life Godzilla💀💀

  • @joebrat6809
    @joebrat6809 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The largest African elephant weighed 12 tonnes and would have easily taken out a T-rex with little effort so yeah...by that logic we could indeed have a 140-ton Argentinosaurus freak specimen.

  • @thampithampi3169
    @thampithampi3169 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro do you know that might have a will might have a large pouch

  • @davepegington9066
    @davepegington9066 หลายเดือนก่อน

    An elephant weighs 5000 kg and eats 150 kg of food per day and it takes 18 hours ( every waking minute) to eat this amount
    A saurpod weighs ten times as much.
    That's the only type of dinosaur I don't believe existed. Because scaling up it should need *minimum* 800 kg of food per day and take 8 times longer to eat (so 144 hours in a 24 period ) to eat this
    Unlike a whale which has a gigantic mouth and can sieve huge amounts of plankton at a time, also the water is supporting its bulk, cutting down drastically on calories needed to move .
    A saurpod has a tiny head and is eating green leafy foliage which isn't nutrient rich.
    Not only this but a saurpod lived in a herd among other gigantic saurpods also needing 850 kg of food per day.
    A herd of these guys (even if it were possible to eat this amount which it isn't)
    Would absolutely devastate the flora everywhere in a huge radius. Causing mass starvation to every other hebervore out there. Which would then also begin to affect the carnivores in a month or two.
    I just don't believe saurpods exist and haven't seen anything to convince me otherwise.
    And arguments like "saurpods had an efficient digestion" while it's purely hypothetical, even if it were true... Ut may bcut it down slightly. But its going to need to reduce its required food by way more than ONE FIFTH!!
    And even then it would still not be able to sleep for eating and there would still be the problem of absolutely wrecking the habitat as it migrated causing havoc for the rest of the fauna.
    Sorry but i don't see them scientifically existing

    • @spongebombepicpants1073
      @spongebombepicpants1073 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Maybe there was a lost food source in the past that could help the sauropods to exist in their gigantism.
      There were many sauropod fossils found scince over 100 years, so it is clear that those creatures existed.
      By the way: th-cam.com/video/fe75Gnv28sU/w-d-xo.htmlsi=f2MwYyaynkaVFt26

    • @davepegington9066
      @davepegington9066 27 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@spongebombepicpants1073 so your logic is. "Well they existed and that's that. So there must have been a magic food"
      Except we are in reality here. Not avatar or star wars
      THERE'S NO PLANTS THAT CONTAIN THE SAME NUTRIENTS AS PLANTS ONE TENTH THEIR SIZE.
      PERIOD.
      Plants evolved to be MORE nutritious after the dinosaurs. NOT LESS. There is now fruit and vegetable biodiversity after the dinosaurs died out. Flirting the Cretaceous it was pre dominantly FERNS. Very low nutrients.
      It isn't scientific to say well saurpods existed they were 100 tons so now all biology and all facts face to be twisted and forced to support that.
      B.s.
      And btw. Saurpods have the most fragmented incomplete skeletons of any dinosaur.
      Their head was comparitively TINY COMPARED TO THEIR BODY
      Most of the neck and tail bones eye missing.
      It's therefore more logical to conclude they were smaller than they think. That instead think. Well gee there must have been a super mario magic mushroom and they only needed a few of them.
      Total horse shi.t
      An elephant spends 18 hours a day eating. That's how much food that large animal needs. Google it. Ask Alexa.
      A UNIVERSAL FACT WITH HERBIVORES is that the bigger they are. The more INEFFICIENT. Their sustainability is.
      A rabbit might only. Need to spend 30 minutes eating. A pig 2 hours. A cow 5 hours an elephant 18 hours a saurpod which I calculated mathematically based on weight needs 144 HOURS PER 24 HOUR PERIOD!!
      and WITH TINY HEADS FOR THEIR SIZE
      If you think we'll there must have been a super food which cuts down their food intake to like 10% that amount. That's Disney fictional garbage.
      I believe all dinosaurs EXCEPT saurpods are possible

  • @RajRaja-wo3uu
    @RajRaja-wo3uu 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

  • @TaurusSaurus
    @TaurusSaurus 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    *Input Gigachad theme song:*

  • @KadenSlinker
    @KadenSlinker หลายเดือนก่อน

    To fight Godzilla that’s why

  • @mechwarrior13
    @mechwarrior13 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dont ever stop talking about biggerer sauropods

  • @ian.r5261
    @ian.r5261 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    personally i believe the true maximum size of sauropod still less heavy than the largest blue whale

  • @jgr7487
    @jgr7487 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The death of such a beast would be comparable to whalefalls!

  • @bobisuncanny2760
    @bobisuncanny2760 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anyone remember Amphicoelias ?

  • @alfredwaldo6079
    @alfredwaldo6079 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So just a below average sized Argentinian sauropod?

  • @LuizFelipe-vx5dy
    @LuizFelipe-vx5dy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If I had to choose the name of a sauropod that exceeds 100 tons, I would choose the name "Thronusargon giganteus", which means "Legitimate King of the Throne of Giants"

  • @user-rw4yi2xw5i
    @user-rw4yi2xw5i 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I m just like nature,because only nature can make truly titanic size objects,and no one man made object or another conception cannot reach to those titanic scales to which only nature can reach

  • @treystephens6166
    @treystephens6166 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I thought that GODZILLA is the BIGGEST ⁉️

  • @isthataspider7410
    @isthataspider7410 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Too bad nobody took pictures of the dinosaurs when they were around.

  • @tofuteh2348
    @tofuteh2348 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Damn boi he thicc

  • @DanM-pw9nl
    @DanM-pw9nl 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I think lumping genders to ignore sexual dimorphism is going to skew your results. When you use a species which is highly sexually dimorphic as an example, it's maximum to average ratio is going to be much higher because the maximum is for one gender (the larger one) while the average is pulled dramatically down by using both genders

  • @abdulazizrex
    @abdulazizrex 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I really hope that we eventually discover a sauropod genus that averages 100 metric tonnes.

  • @itzhellraptor._.9923
    @itzhellraptor._.9923 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    0:51 oh my science!!! Peer reviewed studies back up this!!! Oh my fauci

  • @Intrusion498
    @Intrusion498 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The biggest land animal that we know of is the argentinosaurus huinculensis they got up to 30meters long and up to 84 metric tons thats more than 80 allosaurs
    Magyrosaurus is one of the smallest sauropods ever getting up to 20 feet long and 2200 pounds making it around the size of an average allosaurus these dudes coexisted with the largest animal to ever fly Hatzegopteryx Thambema yes its bigger than quetzocoatlus funny how hatzegopteryx stood up to 10 feet tall and weighed as much as a brown bear

  • @Jose_Hunters_EWF_Remixes
    @Jose_Hunters_EWF_Remixes 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is a magnificent, albeit brief, presentation
    It's light years ahead of the typical TH-cam¹ video
    The adherence to scientific methods and analyses is stunning and incomparable
    This ranks among the top 5 pieces I have observed in 10 years visiting TH-cam
    Extremely well-done, young man
    For the record, I hold 2 REAL undergrad degrees in Chemistry and Physics
    And a REAL graduate degree in Abstract Mathematics
    Rating is ★★★★★ out of 5
    1. TH-cam - where brain cells go to die