Want Erik's ugly mug hanging on your wall? What about a pop art canvas print version? Check it out at: www.etsy.com/listing/1196331880/pop-art-phantom-of-the-opera-on-canvas
I love Erik. He is, as we all are, a being of both light and dark. When I first discovered this story through the Lloyd Webber musical when I was about 15-16 (I'm 32 as of 2020), the Phantom stood out to me as a symbol of hope. In spite of all the shit he'd been through, he still found it in himself believing in love and human connection and trying to find it. As the novel says, "He had a heart that could've held the empire of the world, but in the end, he had to content himself with a cellar." There's something very powerful in that, a man striving for his own humanity when he's constantly told, "No," for reasons beyond his control. I especially identify with that as someone who's been visually impaired since birth. Yes, my situation of growing up in the 21st century with loving family and friends is quite different to Erik's, but I think all people with disabilities/deformities will to some degree experience that sense of "otherness" as long as society continues to make us objects of curiosity in various ways. So, yes, "Phantom" quickly gained a very near and dear spot in my heart. I read the original novel and tracked down every film version I could find (basically, all the ones you showed, plus a few more). And yes, I'll admit, I started out as one of those Phans who felt the Phantom was owed someone's love because of his tragic past and saw Christine as just a shallow, selfish bitch who couldn't see past his face. But as cringe-inducing as that phase was, I'm glad I went through and grew out of it. It served as a good contrasting point for how I came to appreciate the story as I got older. Seeing just how toxic and unhealthy Erik and Christine's relationship was, and how he seemed to be more in love with the idea of her rather than her as a person, only made the story all the more fascinating. It painted a psychological picture, from both Erik and Christine's perspectives, that made the story so much more than the sappy, melodramatic love triangle it's often made into. "The Phantom of the Opera", for me, is a cautionary tale akin to "Frankenstein" about what can happen when an innocent child grows up feeling he has no other choice but to become the monster he's already assumed to be.
I love your post. I would argue however that in the end. at least in the Leroux and ALW version, we do realize that Erik truly loved Christine. Maybe he hadn't until the end, but when she sacrificed herself and kissed him, he realized he loved her, which is why let her go. Not a small sacrifice for the man who spent his whole life alone in misery and abuse who had the chance to keep the one person he loved and who showed him kindness with him forever. I think that's the utter tragedy of the book and most of it's adaptions. In the end he truly did love her but it was too late. Poor unhappy Erik.
@@bawoman Oh, I completely agree: By the end of the story, be it in the book or one of the various adaptations, Erik does realize he loves Christine for who she is as a person because she, in turn, acknowledges his individuality. But until that point, for most of the plot, he's in love with what she represents, a doll-like figure, "a wife I can love and walk with in the countryside on Sundays".
I read the book about two weeks ago. This is exactly how I would picture the Phantom. As a Monster. Not a heartthrob. Think about it. He is obsessed. His obsession over Christine nearly killed the patrons in the opera house
think about it is it really his fault? he was a monster in people’s eyes just because he was deformed witch he didn’t choose to be even his freaking mother didn’t like him he is smart and had lots of talent but what people really cared about was his looks the society made him a monster and if i was in eriks possession i would do anything for love too
Think about it he's essentially had to live as a ghost because he was different for his entire life. He's isolated, alone, and hated by all because of how he looks, and by the time he meets Christine the only joy he's ever known is the fantasy world of opera and music and it turns to obsession because for the first time in his life he knows he doesn't have to be alone in a cold unforgiving world. Does it excuse his crimes, no. But like Frankenstein's Monster, he's as much a victim of a family and a society that rejected him
Erik in the book is supposed to be hideous, but in the end, he truly does prove to love Christine, and Christine's feelings towards him were more ambiguous rather than straight-forward. This story is still my favourite! ^_^
Their love was so toxic. I used to be like "christine is such a b1tch and so selfish" but he was extremely obsessed with the idea of them being together. All that just makes the story way more interesting to me
It would be so cool if they did another remake but this time having the Phantom chased by the Three Spidermans from Marvel Comics in the Opera house!!!! That is in movie where the Phantom drops the giant chandelier on the spectators!!!!
The actual hue of Chaney's make-up was likely a deep yellow only to make it appear as a different hue in black in white. I believe they intentionally went a tiny bit overboard to convey to the audience in black and white that his skin was not normal
@@ChannelingSpirits No actual source, but working with film and black and white, this kind of technique would make sense. He definitely wouldn't have been completely green though. I've just noticed that his skin hue is different than the other actors, and detailed close ups your can see that there is intense makeup on him, I don't doubt that they would've employed a similar technique of making the color (at least on the face) different to sell the idea of him being unnatural, especially in black an white
There was also a 1983 Phantom of the Opera TV movie that was rather well done and was interesting that had Maximillian Schell as the Phantom and Jane Seymour as Maria his love interest and Michael York was in it also. The Phantom’s mask and disfigured face are memorable as well.
I used to have an abridged novelization when I was a kid (early 90s) that had some really weird illustrations. It almost reminded me of the Scary Stories books, although I know it wasn't the same illustrator.
Same here... I was surprised to see how well Leonidas could sing lmao. I see a lot of people giving the movie shit. I know it's not perfect, but it was still a wonderful experience. I loved the songs and loved Gerard Butler as the Phantom of the Opera. I think I'll be looking into the 80's musicals next. Maybe even the novel.
@@debrawebster1356Then the Phantom wouldn't be appealing 😏 There are many versions of the Phantom and some has the character gruesome, so it's great to have a hot version of the Phantom too
Altho I liked the 1925, 1943, 1962 & Charles Dance MFTV versions as well as the Broadway Musical, I like it better when he is portrayed as being born with his deformity, as he was in the Leroux Novel. That's the way Gaston Leroux intended it! As he was in the 1925 version, The Made For TV Version w/ Charles Dance, & The Broadway Musical. Also, Alicia, I found your comments very insightful!
I want to make a proper film version of the musical, change some things here and there (like giving Erik a full face mask and mummy-like face), but nobody can probably do anything until Andrew Lloyd Webber passes. The dude is VERY strict with his work and he's also kind of a bad man. There, I said it. Fight me, prove me wrong.
You're not alone. I have so many ideas of changes for Phantom of the Opera I want to share. And yes. I would like to see the Phantom with a *FULL* mask instead of a half mask. One half of his face distorted doesn't work well. And I certainly don't want to make the Phantom a sexy hunk heartthrob. Booooooo!!! He's supposed to be a monster *AND* a bad guy!! Just like in the book!!
@@jasminnemcdonald94A Worth noting that that's just the Gerard Butler one. In the actual musical, yes, he LOOKS like a heartthrob, but it's a carefully-constructed lie, for he is, true to the book, very old.
Why don't you wanna make an adaptation of the book then? The rights of the books are public domain. A full.mask monster is more likely the book, not the musical
To jasminnemcdonald94A, if I may make one small point. I have read the book multiple times and while you are correct about the phantoms obsession, several of the events that occurred in the theater were accidents. The phantom simply took credit for them. Like the chandelier. That was an accident. And Joseph buqet was not killed by the phantom but the ohantom hung his lifeless corpse and allowed everyone to believe he was responsible
There game call mazm: the phantom of the opera is back in 2018 but when Christine kidnapped by Erik there girl name melek who is trukey and blind woman she is erik blind servant because he kidnapped her after refused to marry him melek try escape but he alway caught her melek abandoned idea plan to escape she was be take to Christine adopt mom home her family do not worries her she now live happy life with her cat
I’ve watched all the film versions of The Phantom Of The Opera & the Andrew Lloyd Webber musical & its sequel Love Never Dies. What did Christine Daae’s voice sound like? I’ve heard Susanna Foster, Heather Sears, Teri Polo & other women who played Christine sing in the film versions, but Sarah Brightman’s portrayal of Christine in the Lloyd Webber musical is my favorite.
0:39 and owns an amusement park 😅NGL when i was 5 and first seen the 25th anniversary one, i fell in love ❤️ both with Erik and the whole franchise and fandom.
The Present Day Paris Opera House in France stands on the sight of a much older wooden structure. Then, somewhere along the line, that structure burned down. The fire burned for 27 hours. Could The Phantom of the Opera be a soul from that long ago fire?
Another issue issue with going so far into the past is what was considered luxury would not necessarily compare with the current day. There would be wealth and grandeur, but also filth and squalor. Medical treatment would be worse, and human rights were mostly worse. Technology was worse, sanitation, science, and so much else.
Nice job going to the original text. It's rare to find a channel that gets a chick who sounds like every word is cut-and-pasted but still has a good video.
So he was born with an abnormal appearance & only wished to be normal, loved by a woman who essentially betrays him based upon her own vanity. If we all meet the same fate why are we so critical & adherent to pleasing appearance? Aren't all people deserving of love?
Lon chaneys phantom was the best. Such a shame that nobody knows about it because of that shitty andrew lloyd webber musical and its "hunky" phantom. He should be grotesque not a lil bit burned on one side of his face
What if we took Raul out of Phantom of the Opera and put just Christine Justice Phantom just Meg and Madame Jerry and Gustave and this is set in Coney Island 1988
The phantom did exist,i know he did because god created him just like he created aliens and werewolves and vampires and ghosts and witches so therefore he created the phantom of the opera
I have an idea for a movie about a war between the Classic Monsters and the modern slasher movie guys; it's revealed that the Phantom and Jigsaw are playing both sides for fools.
Want Erik's ugly mug hanging on your wall? What about a pop art canvas print version? Check it out at: www.etsy.com/listing/1196331880/pop-art-phantom-of-the-opera-on-canvas
I love Erik. He is, as we all are, a being of both light and dark. When I first discovered this story through the Lloyd Webber musical when I was about 15-16 (I'm 32 as of 2020), the Phantom stood out to me as a symbol of hope. In spite of all the shit he'd been through, he still found it in himself believing in love and human connection and trying to find it. As the novel says, "He had a heart that could've held the empire of the world, but in the end, he had to content himself with a cellar." There's something very powerful in that, a man striving for his own humanity when he's constantly told, "No," for reasons beyond his control.
I especially identify with that as someone who's been visually impaired since birth. Yes, my situation of growing up in the 21st century with loving family and friends is quite different to Erik's, but I think all people with disabilities/deformities will to some degree experience that sense of "otherness" as long as society continues to make us objects of curiosity in various ways. So, yes, "Phantom" quickly gained a very near and dear spot in my heart. I read the original novel and tracked down every film version I could find (basically, all the ones you showed, plus a few more). And yes, I'll admit, I started out as one of those Phans who felt the Phantom was owed someone's love because of his tragic past and saw Christine as just a shallow, selfish bitch who couldn't see past his face. But as cringe-inducing as that phase was, I'm glad I went through and grew out of it. It served as a good contrasting point for how I came to appreciate the story as I got older.
Seeing just how toxic and unhealthy Erik and Christine's relationship was, and how he seemed to be more in love with the idea of her rather than her as a person, only made the story all the more fascinating. It painted a psychological picture, from both Erik and Christine's perspectives, that made the story so much more than the sappy, melodramatic love triangle it's often made into. "The Phantom of the Opera", for me, is a cautionary tale akin to "Frankenstein" about what can happen when an innocent child grows up feeling he has no other choice but to become the monster he's already assumed to be.
I love your post. I would argue however that in the end. at least in the Leroux and ALW version, we do realize that Erik truly loved Christine. Maybe he hadn't until the end, but when she sacrificed herself and kissed him, he realized he loved her, which is why let her go. Not a small sacrifice for the man who spent his whole life alone in misery and abuse who had the chance to keep the one person he loved and who showed him kindness with him forever. I think that's the utter tragedy of the book and most of it's adaptions. In the end he truly did love her but it was too late. Poor unhappy Erik.
@@bawoman Oh, I completely agree: By the end of the story, be it in the book or one of the various adaptations, Erik does realize he loves Christine for who she is as a person because she, in turn, acknowledges his individuality. But until that point, for most of the plot, he's in love with what she represents, a doll-like figure, "a wife I can love and walk with in the countryside on Sundays".
Criminally underrated comment
@@b.d6642 Thanks.
Have you read Susan Kay’s Phantom by any chance?
I read the book about two weeks ago. This is exactly how I would picture the Phantom. As a Monster. Not a heartthrob. Think about it. He is obsessed. His obsession over Christine nearly killed the patrons in the opera house
think about it is it really his fault? he was a monster in people’s eyes just because he was deformed witch he didn’t choose to be even his freaking mother didn’t like him he is smart and had lots of talent but what people really cared about was his looks the society made him a monster and if i was in eriks possession i would do anything for love too
In the end, he does show that he truly does love her.
@@EmilyGloeggler7984 Depends on which version, in the original 1925 movie he gives her an option of being his forever or watching her lover die.
Think about it he's essentially had to live as a ghost because he was different for his entire life. He's isolated, alone, and hated by all because of how he looks, and by the time he meets Christine the only joy he's ever known is the fantasy world of opera and music and it turns to obsession because for the first time in his life he knows he doesn't have to be alone in a cold unforgiving world. Does it excuse his crimes, no. But like Frankenstein's Monster, he's as much a victim of a family and a society that rejected him
Erik was briefly a circus freak right?
So the phantom was also a SLAVE OF FASHION 🎶
How did he become the phantom?? Always lurking in the shadows desperate for love 😅
Erik in the book is supposed to be hideous, but in the end, he truly does prove to love Christine, and Christine's feelings towards him were more ambiguous rather than straight-forward. This story is still my favourite! ^_^
Their love was so toxic. I used to be like "christine is such a b1tch and so selfish" but he was extremely obsessed with the idea of them being together. All that just makes the story way more interesting to me
You forgot one of the best portrayals! Charles Dance in the 1990 miniseries. It's so underappreciated!
The best portrayal of all undoubtly!!!
The most tragic one I have seen
I loved that series
But it strays from Leroux's original work.
2004’s version was pretty underrated too
Poor erik,its so horrible what erik went through how could a mother not love her own son no wonder he was so messed up
It would be so cool if they did another remake but this time having the Phantom chased by the Three Spidermans from Marvel Comics in the Opera house!!!! That is in movie where the Phantom drops the giant chandelier on the spectators!!!!
The actual hue of Chaney's make-up was likely a deep yellow only to make it appear as a different hue in black in white. I believe they intentionally went a tiny bit overboard to convey to the audience in black and white that his skin was not normal
Do you have a source for this? I've often wondered why the Phantom was often depicted as yellow.
@@ChannelingSpirits No actual source, but working with film and black and white, this kind of technique would make sense. He definitely wouldn't have been completely green though. I've just noticed that his skin hue is different than the other actors, and detailed close ups your can see that there is intense makeup on him, I don't doubt that they would've employed a similar technique of making the color (at least on the face) different to sell the idea of him being unnatural, especially in black an white
@@ChannelingSpirits though it makes sense for the character to be depicted as yellow because that's what the book says he was "a Nasty Yellow"
And then Depalma went off the rails in the best way and made Phantom of the Paradise
That's an Understatement.
“My music is for Phoenix, only she can sing it, anyone else who tries, dies” fuckin love that movie, stellar soundtrack
Loved that version too
the hammer version is my favorite traditional adaptation, the de palma version is my favorite adaptation EVER.
There was also a 1983 Phantom of the Opera TV movie that was rather well done and was interesting that had Maximillian Schell as the Phantom and Jane Seymour as Maria his love interest and Michael York was in it also.
The Phantom’s mask and disfigured face are memorable as well.
Most horrific phantom of all
The ver of Erik from the musical and 2004 movie is nowdays the most iconic
I used to have an abridged novelization when I was a kid (early 90s) that had some really weird illustrations. It almost reminded me of the Scary Stories books, although I know it wasn't the same illustrator.
I heard erik destler is alive still, I heard He was immortal and he haunts opera but not as a ghost but physically
Lon chaney was a pure genius,no wonder he was known as the man of a thousand faces
This is fantastic video. Full of information I never knew, Heidi has such a nice narration voice.
This is very professional video, tons of great clips and content. You even quote the novel! I subscribed to your channel! 🎉
That was brilliant wow it was so interesting
I thought Gerard Butler played an excellent Phantom and that the delivered such a great performance.
Same its one of my favourite movies.
Same here... I was surprised to see how well Leonidas could sing lmao.
I see a lot of people giving the movie shit. I know it's not perfect, but it was still a wonderful experience. I loved the songs and loved Gerard Butler as the Phantom of the Opera.
I think I'll be looking into the 80's musicals next. Maybe even the novel.
Only problem with Gerald Butler playing Erik was he was too sexy Erik was far from sexy in the book he was mad and Gruesome to look at
@@debrawebster1356Then the Phantom wouldn't be appealing 😏 There are many versions of the Phantom and some has the character gruesome, so it's great to have a hot version of the Phantom too
Altho I liked the 1925, 1943, 1962 & Charles Dance MFTV versions as well as the Broadway Musical, I like it better when he is portrayed as being born with his deformity, as he was in the Leroux Novel. That's the way Gaston Leroux intended it! As he was in the 1925 version, The Made For TV Version w/ Charles Dance, & The Broadway Musical. Also, Alicia, I found your comments very insightful!
Love YOUR Channel, Keep it UP!!!
Thank you, truly. We work hard on these videos and appreciate you enjoying them.
@@ChannelingSpirits I try to Support, thanks for the Content!!
I’m really excited about this episode. My favorite was the haunted house episode, I think about it quite often.
Phantom of Opera is my favorite musical, I’m currently reading the book 😊
I want to make a proper film version of the musical, change some things here and there (like giving Erik a full face mask and mummy-like face), but nobody can probably do anything until Andrew Lloyd Webber passes.
The dude is VERY strict with his work and he's also kind of a bad man. There, I said it. Fight me, prove me wrong.
You're not alone. I have so many ideas of changes for Phantom of the Opera I want to share. And yes. I would like to see the Phantom with a *FULL* mask instead of a half mask. One half of his face distorted doesn't work well. And I certainly don't want to make the Phantom a sexy hunk heartthrob. Booooooo!!! He's supposed to be a monster *AND* a bad guy!! Just like in the book!!
@@jasminnemcdonald94A Worth noting that that's just the Gerard Butler one. In the actual musical, yes, he LOOKS like a heartthrob, but it's a carefully-constructed lie, for he is, true to the book, very old.
Why don't you wanna make an adaptation of the book then? The rights of the books are public domain. A full.mask monster is more likely the book, not the musical
@@jasminnemcdonald94AThen again, make an adaptation of the book and forget about the musical then
Just became a subscriber. You win me over with an amazing video
This is one of my favorite stories
Hearing the opening rift of Toccata and Fugue D Minor, still gives me chills! And for those who doesn't know, that is the Phantom Of The Opera!
Very detailed! Thank you, this is amazing
Thank you for researching and creating an amazing video!!! You have gained a subscriber.
Thanks. I’m a longtime fan of the musical. I wondered what was in the book but never felt like reading it.
I enjoyed Claude Rains and Robert Englund. Of course love Lon Channey Sr. Too.
The Phantom was just Darkman going through a phase.
You. I like you.
amazingly well done
thank you for this, saved my drama grade
Hopefully you aced it!
The video title reminds me of the Who Was books we’d read in elementary school
Sailor Moon reference is enough for me
You mean, not enough?
Is there every really enough Sailor Moon?
To jasminnemcdonald94A, if I may make one small point. I have read the book multiple times and while you are correct about the phantoms obsession, several of the events that occurred in the theater were accidents. The phantom simply took credit for them. Like the chandelier. That was an accident. And Joseph buqet was not killed by the phantom but the ohantom hung his lifeless corpse and allowed everyone to believe he was responsible
I cracked up at the gremlins part. 😂
There game call mazm: the phantom of the opera is back in 2018 but when Christine kidnapped by Erik there girl name melek who is trukey and blind woman she is erik blind servant because he kidnapped her after refused to marry him melek try escape but he alway caught her melek abandoned idea plan to escape she was be take to Christine adopt mom home her family do not worries her she now live happy life with her cat
They should re make phantom opera Gaston Leroux novel as movie
And have the phantom very similar to Lon Chaney look
I’ve watched all the film versions of The Phantom Of The Opera & the Andrew Lloyd Webber musical & its sequel Love Never Dies. What did Christine Daae’s voice sound like? I’ve heard Susanna Foster, Heather Sears, Teri Polo & other women who played Christine sing in the film versions, but Sarah Brightman’s portrayal of Christine in the Lloyd Webber musical is my favorite.
If I remember correctly. In french, Érik's eyes are described as "So dark that you can only see them in pitch black darkness."
At 2:10, what was that cartoon from? I remember seeing it on some DVD a long time ago and can’t remember what it was.
The cartoon where several literary monsters step out of their books is from "Have You Got Any Castles?" (1938).
Thanks for reminding me to see the severed flesh mask version
I am honestly a little disappointed that the Maximillian shell phantom wasn’t mentioned
0:39 and owns an amusement park 😅NGL when i was 5 and first seen the 25th anniversary one, i fell in love ❤️ both with Erik and the whole franchise and fandom.
Bruh i love the "have any castles" clips
Major points for knowing an obscure cartoon. We had to include it!
@@ChannelingSpirits I had it on vhs! I actually did a redraw of it back in high school LMAO
My favourite version remains the original novel.
think best part out of all surnames, destler the most remembered and recognized names for the phantom
Thank you for not using the Gerard Butler version! I'm glad you went with the 25th anniversary show instead. Great video!! 🖤
There is a cartoon version on yt that has a pretty good image of what Laroux wrote.
I love your videos. If you ever have funeral related questions, feel free to reach out.
6:20 when you didn’t freak out the phantom but freak out the sailor moon upcoming
“I didn’t see that coming....”
I was told he died in the opera house fire
Leroux should’ve kept Garnier’s real first name, Charles.
Am I the only one who sees Claude rains mask as a more washed out blue rather than white? Lol
It was meant to be blue
The Present Day Paris Opera House in France stands on the sight of a much older wooden structure. Then, somewhere along the line, that structure burned down. The fire burned for 27 hours. Could The Phantom of the Opera be a soul from that long ago fire?
The best version of the phantom in my opinion definitely has to be the musical.
Best phantom was lon Chaney he was a thing of horror
I prefer the Phantom with the mask covering half of his face.
I have seen the 1962 version,and i quite like it
2:09 who’s the yellow guy?
Fu Manchu
It's time for Monstermaniacs
And they're creepy to the Max
So just sit back and relax
You'll scream till you collapse
For Monstermaniacs!!
funfact: they change the mask because the actors could not sing wth the full mask.
what was the opening clip
As in what episode of Family Guy is that from or something else?
Another issue issue with going so far into the past is what was considered luxury would not necessarily compare with the current day. There would be wealth and grandeur, but also filth and squalor. Medical treatment would be worse, and human rights were mostly worse. Technology was worse, sanitation, science, and so much else.
killed it
Nice job going to the original text. It's rare to find a channel that gets a chick who sounds like every word is cut-and-pasted but still has a good video.
well it can make good assasin servamt in fate series or smt/ persona
You really dislike the 2004 movie version, don't you ?
Lon Chaney
Damn. He was hideous. Lmao. They made him sexy in later years.
He was hideous in the book too
Have just re painted an Aurora model kit i put together as a 12 -year -old. Am now 58. Phantom rules ok
So he was born with an abnormal appearance & only wished to be normal, loved by a woman who essentially betrays him based upon her own vanity. If we all meet the same fate why are we so critical & adherent to pleasing appearance?
Aren't all people deserving of love?
Lon chaneys phantom was the best. Such a shame that nobody knows about it because of that shitty andrew lloyd webber musical and its "hunky" phantom. He should be grotesque not a lil bit burned on one side of his face
The deformity in Andrew Lloyd Webber’s musical is more horrifying and it is a birth defect
@@gloveboxgopher im sorry but factually it just simply isnt as grotesque. chaneys one looks like a skull with a thin layer of skin over it.
@@padraigpearse1551 the Andrew Loyd Webber phantom has less hair, and exposed skull and brain
I made a wood painting (I burnt it in the wood) and in my painting the phantom is a skeleton with the clothing and a hat on and nothing more
Do zombies
What if we took Raul out of Phantom of the Opera and put just Christine Justice Phantom just Meg and Madame Jerry and Gustave and this is set in Coney Island 1988
It wouldn’t be phantom of the opera.
You ripped off love never dies you spooky stork
Interesting criminal profile.
Ilove you somuch miss
Andrew Lloyd Webber also ripped off the main theme of his opera from Pink Floyd's Echoes
The phantom did exist,i know he did because god created him just like he created aliens and werewolves and vampires and ghosts and witches so therefore he created the phantom of the opera
So the phantom was the first ever Leatherface?
I have an idea for a movie about a war between the Classic Monsters and the modern slasher movie guys; it's revealed that the Phantom and Jigsaw are playing both sides for fools.
@@nicholastosoni707 I'd watch that
Leather face was made before the rob England phantom
the movie
They never explain the Phantom's powers.
What were the Phantom's powers?
Hypnotizing
ok
Excuse me? 15:14 is hottt