i disagree. we use science to approve and disapprove things. im a Christian and the use of science is the way to convert atheists not verses from the bible. stop being arrogant
@@God_And_Gains And the holy spirit has been failing for the past few decades as church attendance has crashed. Has something to do with being better informed and educated.
The water upon which this supposed ark sat on was undulating. In the trade we call it hogging and sagging. This means that every time a wave rolled under the ship it would cause the parts of the ship that were not supported by water to sag, while the other part would push up, or hog. This bending would have torn this box apart because of the structural limitations of wood as a construction material. Maybe look up the story of the USS Wyoming and see how a smaller ship made of wood and braced with steel and had steam pumps in it failed because of the very same issue I pointed out here.
Exactly: The Ark was not a ship or boat. It had no propulsion, no sails, no oars, no rudder. It was a barge. It floated and went were the water currents and winds took it. The design is proven perfectly seaworthy.
@@JB-yb4wn You don't know that. If you actually have an inquisitive mind search on youtube: 9. Dr. Joel Klenck, 100% Noah's Ark, Scientific Archaeological Method and Theory
Does it need science to 'confirm' the Bible now? No. Science is CONSISTENT with the Bible. Bible first, science second. After all the Creation account explains even why science is possible at all.
Science disproves the god of Abraham redundantly. According to the Abrahamic faiths we originate from the Middle East and we decent from Adam and Eve who were made in god image roughly 10k-6k years ago. We now know that we evolved from apes and that we originate from central Africa and our species came to be over 200,000 years ago. Why would god wait 198,000 years into human history to release his book? Wouldn’t he want us all to know the truth immediately (which is what the Bible alleged)? Why would he leave us a book? A book is up to interpretation by the reader, you can read the same book I’m reading and derive a totally different conclusions than I. Wouldn’t god want us to know precisely how we should worship him? Why wouldn’t he leave us clear and decisive instructions? Conveniently, these books just so happen to be originally written in the language the people of the Middle East were speaking at the time lol. Why is there no disruption in other peoples around the worlds is lives during the global flood? Native American archaeological sights should have a very sudden end when the flood occurred as should have every other subgroup across the globe yet no such thing exists. Where are the dead corpses of all the animals that died during the flood? We have evidence that proves the dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago, yet we can’t find the mass corpses of the animals that died in the flood. How could that be? I know, because the flood never happened. We should also see the corpses of salt water animals in places like Kyrgyzstan. There should be corpses of sharks, whales and dolphins on lands far away from salt water. All the fresh water animals should have perished given the fresh water would have been tainted by salt water. It’s so obviously not true and the more scientific data we get, the more obvious that becomes. Religious people today have to actively deny reality and live in a constant state of cognitive dissonance to believe this garbage. The flood never happened.
@6:20 The problem I have with THE ARK ENCOUNTER is the Bible describes AN ARK, not a boat with a keel. An ark is A BOX that is carried with staves. They are found all over Egypt. In this case Noah's ark was carried on water, but it was not designed to go anywhere. Why does the Ark Encounter feature a boat with a keel? IMHO
I left my Cat for a month at my Parents house and they were so pissed and mad at me for doing this. My Parents were Struggling Taken Care a Small Kitten and you tell me Noah Take care of 7000 Animals??? FFS And people Believe it?
It doesn't matter if it isn't true. People choose to believe it even when they know how impossible it is. God creates the universe but can't build the Arc. He needs Noah to do the grunt work.
The water came from the earth itself, the deep fountains opened up, meaning the ocean crusts opened up, and that probably created the rain through thermal reactions, and then water receded into the current oceans and seas we see. It was a new earth formed basically. Which is scientifically very plausible.
@@TimeIsNow4Jesusin the ark tale they never mentioned the earths changing shape. Meaning did the trenches deepen and the mountains rise to create the oceans? No it just said the water receded
@@Doty6String "In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened. Genesis 7:11. The earth didn't change it's shape. The land just broke apart when the deep fountains opened up, as in the crust of the earth this the plates of the land itself broke apart .. this implies it broke open and gave rise to what we have now.
@@TimeIsNow4Jesus my biggest take away reading the ark tale in the book was simply how vague it is. Which is fine, for me the scientific record is so much more detailed. It actually explicitly explains the history of the earth. Both are fine for different uses. Bible = life manual. Scientific record = history
I loaded & unloaded trucks, by hand, as a teenager. When you say nearly 500 truck loads, that would have taken me and my one associate a year or more to load, by hand. That must be a huge boat!! .... & evidently, there were no rainbows before the flood. Hmmm, ....
Correct. There were no rainbows before the Flood. The antideluvian world was a different place. It didn't rain because water came from springs. Earth was still very much a paradise.
Just more nonsense. Why not offer proof of Prometheus being chained by Zeus? Bet if we look hard enough we can find the iron dust of his ancient fetters...
Hi, if you read this I really need some answers as I was looking up to see what the response from secular worldview when it comes to soft tissue preservation, and what I found was they stated that it has something to do with mineralogy of the rocks as well as the iron molecules might bind to protein in the tissue which act as some furnish against decomposition process and make it possible under these particular conditions that soft tissues to be lasting for millions of years. Thank you in advance! God bless
I wish more theists were like you, actually looking up stuff and learning from it. Yes, the soft tissue preservation can happen under the circumstances that you have stated, it is very rare, but Mary Schweitzer who found the T-Rex one that you speak of, has also found another one.
Ok there have been over 200 soft tissue finds now with secular ages of 65 mil to 500 million years old.. yes soft tissue is real but NO MARYS PAPER DOES NOT AND NEVER HAS PROVEN DEEP TIME. her paper is the furthest thing from actual science if you ask Me. It's got more holes in it then bidens morality. Also there are plenty other papers that totally disagree with her findings. Collagen and actin are just 2 of the protiens found in the soft tissue and we know for fact those can't last more then a few thousand years without breaking down completely. So no iron preservation is a lie a good excuse to push deep time but no it doesn't work
1st lie; the Ark was helped out by the state of TN and the local village. Under a program enacted by the Kentucky General Assembly in 2010, Ark Encounter investors applied for Economic Development Incentives that would allow them to recoup 25 percent of the project's construction costs by keeping a portion of the park's sales taxes during its first ten years of operation.[27] Receipt of the incentives would be contingent upon Ark Encounter meeting established performance goals upon opening.[28] A press release from Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear's office cited a feasibility study commissioned by Ark Encounter, LLC and conducted by consumer research corporation America's Research Group Limited, Inc.[28]
I don't remember unicorns at the Ark, but I recently learned about the Siberian Unicorn, which was a massive rhinoceros-like creature during the ice age.
Fantasic presentation ! wish i could visit the ark encounter and also the real ark in east turkey ! Has anyone at the creation museum been out to the real ark ark ? i have been following their progress since the beginning of finding it !
He's a television entertainer not an actual scientist looking for truth, he only goes off of atheist propaganda of irrational thinking about the world rather than searching for the truth.
@@alexdrake8079 Bill has a degree in engineering, specifically, mechanical engineering. There is no propaganda in what he says as it isn't backed up by a poorly written, laughable screed. The very science that he shows is what makes our society progress, religion doesn't. Religion is the opiate of the masses who are too stupid to think for themselves.
Just as you know you are going to heaven I know I am going to heaven and I know the creation and ark stories are myth. You do not need to believe in literal creation stories to be saved.
This is how Noah fit all the animals on the ark; God told Noah to bring the SEED of every creature upon the ark as well as two of every unclean, and seven of every clean animal. They were stuck on the ark for a year, so every, very young animal had a year to grow. Growth was retarded due to the cool darkness of the ark during that year the waters were receding. So some animals hibernated, others were inactive with slowed metabolism, therefore, slowed appetite. Just before being released, many animals were artificially inseminated so that they gave birth shortly after leaving the ark to give them a headstart. Smaller animals, like rodents, which could serve as food for larger animals also mate frequently and have huge numbers of offspring at once. The offspring grow quickly and procreate rapidly. The flood was above the tops of the highest mountains, so it was global. Everything upon the Earth, every soul died! Only those on the ark survived. This is why the SEED of sea creatures and birds survived in spite of the rain and flood.
@@JB-yb4wn No. The geography of the antediluvian earth was far different than today's. There were no high mountains. There was one continent Pangaea or The Garden of Eden. It didn’t exist 350 million years ago but 6,000. The transformation of the earth was due to a worldwide CATASTROPHE. In this the high mountains rose for the first time. Like Titicata @ 10,000 feet still supports oceanic life forms.
How? It explains more of how we got the fossil record rather than how science explains which it doesn't explain how millions of animals died across the planet because if everything died at once from a global catastrophe then how could there still be life on this planet?
@@JB-yb4wn Apparently I know much more than you do here because all you are doing is repeating the same opinions from other scientists when they still don't understand the laws of nature because if those dinosaurs would have died a natural death then animals and bacteria would have broken down the body long before they would have been buried into ground. There's no way that all of these creatures buried in the ground could have stayed around for millions of years yet still be preserved so well that we can see and touch them. Those fossils would have to be buried in the ground when they were alive at a very rapid rate of time for the fossils of their bodies to be preserved so well in ground.
I took my family to the Ark Encounter and Creation museum last year. They were AMAZING! Thank you Answers in Genesis for helping me shape my children's worldview according to Scripture.
That’s a blessing in disguise, there’s actual science books in your local library for free that would be much more worth your time to read and won’t rot your brain like the books you want do :)
I don't understand why some people don't understand how many animals were on the ark. are we forgetting that it was God Himself that sent the animals to Noah to keep them alive. Therefore there would have been the right number of animals, since God Himself chose and sent them to Noah.
They could have came on the ark as babies which most reptiles grow much slower than any other animal so I believe grew bigger over years time. Dinosaurs aren't fully grown within a year like most mammals
@@JB-yb4wn We don't know that for sure because those dinosaurs had to be buried quickly for fossils to be preserved so well that those fossils wouldn't be there anymore even if they were 65 millions years old and we probably wouldn't have any fossil fuel today if the Earth was even close to that old
@@sandosam807 The Bible. God created everything, Scientist give them their names, but God set everything in place. Job chapters 38 - 42 is a perfect one, where God says "Where were you when I laid the foundations of the Earth?" (38:4) "Look, now at the behemoth, Which I made along with you; He eats grass like an ox. See now, his strength is in his hips. And his power is in his stomach muscles. He moves his tail like a cedar; . . " (40:15) To me that is a stegosaurus - what animal fits that description. Hippo & elephant have small tails. These Chapters in Job are full of them. Psalm 19 is another, there are many more, throughout the Bible. I will let you check these & many more. May God bless your interest in Him
@@michellecollins6193 Oh you mean the Earth that doesn't move and has a glass dome over it? We talking about that biblical Earth? Because if we are, your god is laughingly wrong here.
@@JB-yb4wn The Bible doesn't say that. God created everything, He hung the earth, stars & moon in space. He created the sky, sea & earth, & everything on & in them. so I don't understand where you get the glass dome & that the earth doesn't move. How do you think He created gravity, by spinning the earth & put it orbit
Here are a couple of items that you might want to try and explain. If the water got higher than all the high mountains, then why didn't the water freeze solid, along with the ark and all of the creatures that were supposed to be in it? Were all of the mountains a lot shorter then then now? Ok, while you are contemplating that one, here is another. Since everything was covered with water, how did the inhabitants of the ark breathe? Everybody knows that the plants that grow on the planet are where the oxygen comes from. Get real. I heard one bible expert say that the water was on the Earth for 13 months. Surely any excess oxygen would have depleted by then. You would think that God who is supposed to know everything, would have known all about that stuff but likely the inhabitants of the Earth at that time did not know those things, and they are really who wrote the scriptures, or possibly Moses who was probably ignorant of those things also.
@@davidgardner863 Water came bursting through the ground splitting parts of the Earth and water plus mud were building up then land moving up on top of each other to form those mountains. Makes more sense than anything science says about how mountains formed 😆
So do you know who the first humans were then? Because humans couldn't have evolved from animals especially since no animal has ever given birth to a human like your evolution says lol 😆
The bible is the most accurate book in the world. Search: What is the most accurate book in the world. Ok? Also did everything that we witness on earth just appear naturally out of nowhere like magic ✨?
@@christianpulido8360 What is the most accurate book in the world? It's challenging to determine the single most accurate book in the world, as accuracy can be subjective and depends on the context. Different books serve different purposes and cover various topics. Additionally, the accuracy of information can change over time as new discoveries are made, and perspectives evolve. In terms of religious beliefs, followers often consider their sacred texts, such as the Bible, Quran, or Bhagavad Gita, to be the most accurate and authoritative. However, these texts are matters of faith and interpretation. In the realm of scientific knowledge, textbooks and academic publications are generally designed to present accurate information based on current understanding and evidence. Yet, even in science, theories and models can be revised as new information emerges. For historical accuracy, reputable historical accounts and well-researched non-fiction works are often considered reliable sources. However, historians may have different interpretations of events. In the end, the concept of the "most accurate" book is highly dependent on the field of knowledge and the criteria used for evaluation. It's essential to consider multiple sources, critically evaluate information, and stay open to updates and revisions based on ongoing research and discovery. There you go. The bible is a matter of faith and interpretation - SUBJECTIVE accuracy. Chatgpt is so cool.
![ได้เวลา! พาน้องแฝดฉีดวัคซีนครบ 1 เดือน🫣 [cc] แดนแพทตี้ SS2 | EP.52 |](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IzeLtaXBLNE/mqdefault.jpg)
The Bible is Truth, Psalms 119:105 "Thy Word is a lamp to guide me & a light for my path." & when people read it brightens their lives
I wanna go see this ark
Doesn’t exist
The Bible doesn't need confirmation from Science. The Bible is the Word of God and is the truth.
i disagree. we use science to approve and disapprove things. im a Christian and the use of science is the way to convert atheists not verses from the bible. stop being arrogant
@@sandosam807The Bible is Science and Historical. Theories are models based on assumptions with simplified calculations and left out data.
@@sandosam807we as humans don't convert anyone. The Holy Spirit does that.
@@God_And_Gains
And the holy spirit has been failing for the past few decades as church attendance has crashed. Has something to do with being better informed and educated.
Which is lucky since science disproves everything this video is saying.
People establish beliefs and seek evidence to support whether you are Christian or Atheist.
EVERY IOTA OF THE WORD OF GOD HAS COME TRUE. ITS ONLY THE MATTER OF STUBBORN HUMAN HEART.
Funny how the pentagon wants to now release so called ufo files but never do
They want to release proof of creation
Because they don't have that
because there's absolutely zero proof of it. 😂😂
All the ark had to do was float up to the top of the seas. Then eventually come down as the water receeded. It wasn't a sail ship.
The water upon which this supposed ark sat on was undulating. In the trade we call it hogging and sagging. This means that every time a wave rolled under the ship it would cause the parts of the ship that were not supported by water to sag, while the other part would push up, or hog. This bending would have torn this box apart because of the structural limitations of wood as a construction material.
Maybe look up the story of the USS Wyoming and see how a smaller ship made of wood and braced with steel and had steam pumps in it failed because of the very same issue I pointed out here.
Exactly: The Ark was not a ship or boat. It had no propulsion, no sails, no oars, no rudder. It was a barge. It floated and went were the water currents and winds took it. The design is proven perfectly seaworthy.
@@JB-yb4wn The SS Wyoming (not USS) was launched in 1909 and sank in heavy seas 24 years later. It is disingenuous to compare this ship with the Ark.
@@deepcosmiclove
Yes, I know. The Wyoming was real, the ark wasn't.
@@JB-yb4wn You don't know that. If you actually have an inquisitive mind search on youtube: 9. Dr. Joel Klenck, 100% Noah's Ark, Scientific Archaeological Method and Theory
Does it need science to 'confirm' the Bible now? No. Science is CONSISTENT with the Bible. Bible first, science second. After all the Creation account explains even why science is possible at all.
Science disproves the god of Abraham redundantly. According to the Abrahamic faiths we originate from the Middle East and we decent from Adam and Eve who were made in god image roughly 10k-6k years ago. We now know that we evolved from apes and that we originate from central Africa and our species came to be over 200,000 years ago. Why would god wait 198,000 years into human history to release his book? Wouldn’t he want us all to know the truth immediately (which is what the Bible alleged)? Why would he leave us a book? A book is up to interpretation by the reader, you can read the same book I’m reading and derive a totally different conclusions than I. Wouldn’t god want us to know precisely how we should worship him? Why wouldn’t he leave us clear and decisive instructions? Conveniently, these books just so happen to be originally written in the language the people of the Middle East were speaking at the time lol. Why is there no disruption in other peoples around the worlds is lives during the global flood? Native American archaeological sights should have a very sudden end when the flood occurred as should have every other subgroup across the globe yet no such thing exists. Where are the dead corpses of all the animals that died during the flood? We have evidence that proves the dinosaurs went extinct 65 million years ago, yet we can’t find the mass corpses of the animals that died in the flood. How could that be? I know, because the flood never happened. We should also see the corpses of salt water animals in places like Kyrgyzstan. There should be corpses of sharks, whales and dolphins on lands far away from salt water. All the fresh water animals should have perished given the fresh water would have been tainted by salt water. It’s so obviously not true and the more scientific data we get, the more obvious that becomes. Religious people today have to actively deny reality and live in a constant state of cognitive dissonance to believe this garbage. The flood never happened.
where is science consistent with the bible? please explain.
@6:20 The problem I have with THE ARK ENCOUNTER is the Bible describes AN ARK, not a boat with a keel. An ark is A BOX that is carried with staves. They are found all over Egypt. In this case Noah's ark was carried on water, but it was not designed to go anywhere. Why does the Ark Encounter feature a boat with a keel? IMHO
Have you actually recreated it by the exact directions laid out in the Bible? If you do, that picture is pretty accurate actually js
Ark also means boat or ship.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA......oh you're serious?
It is probably not a good idea to mock God.
For your information It was 7 of clean animals an 2 of unclean animals that is what that Bible states
Hey the real ARK is found in ARARAT Mountain Turkey is there
I left my Cat for a month at my Parents house and they were so pissed and mad at me for doing this. My Parents were Struggling Taken Care a Small Kitten and you tell me Noah Take care of 7000 Animals??? FFS And people Believe it?
Yep, a lot of people believe in this story
Edit: it was 7000 pairs (14000 animals)
It doesn't matter if it isn't true. People choose to believe it even when they know how impossible it is. God creates the universe but can't build the Arc. He needs Noah to do the grunt work.
@@svitozar8618 Many of the animals are small and most of them hibernated through the long cold journey. In Scandinavia most farm animals hibernate.
@@jimbobaggans1564 Good doesn't NEED Noah to build the Ark. God wants Noah to do it.
@@deepcosmiclove “many of the animals are small and most of them hibernated”???? What???? Are you sure you understand what you’re talking about????
where did all the water come from and where did it do afterwards. the last ice age ended 7000 years before noahs ark
The water came from the earth itself, the deep fountains opened up, meaning the ocean crusts opened up, and that probably created the rain through thermal reactions, and then water receded into the current oceans and seas we see. It was a new earth formed basically. Which is scientifically very plausible.
Minor details lol
@@TimeIsNow4Jesusin the ark tale they never mentioned the earths changing shape. Meaning did the trenches deepen and the mountains rise to create the oceans? No it just said the water receded
@@Doty6String "In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
Genesis 7:11.
The earth didn't change it's shape. The land just broke apart when the deep fountains opened up, as in the crust of the earth this the plates of the land itself broke apart .. this implies it broke open and gave rise to what we have now.
@@TimeIsNow4Jesus my biggest take away reading the ark tale in the book was simply how vague it is. Which is fine, for me the scientific record is so much more detailed. It actually explicitly explains the history of the earth. Both are fine for different uses. Bible = life manual. Scientific record = history
Science confirms the food? Praise be Marduk and the other Babylonian gods. After all the Hebrew people just copied the story
if science confirms this, then why hasn't science confirmed this?
Biggest flaw in this whole analysis is using “kind” as your work around.
Thank you for the beautiful presentation, God bless you for all the hard work
I loaded & unloaded trucks, by hand, as a teenager. When you say nearly 500 truck loads, that would have taken me and my one associate a year or more to load, by hand. That must be a huge boat!! .... & evidently, there were no rainbows before the flood. Hmmm, ....
Correct. There were no rainbows before the Flood. The antideluvian world was a different place. It didn't rain because water came from springs. Earth was still very much a paradise.
Just more nonsense. Why not offer proof of Prometheus being chained by Zeus? Bet if we look hard enough we can find the iron dust of his ancient fetters...
We should believe in utter nonsense like the Big Bang?
The word "Ark" is "Box" in Hebrew
Hi, if you read this I really need some answers as I was looking up to see what the response from secular worldview when it comes to soft tissue preservation, and what I found was they stated that it has something to do with mineralogy of the rocks as well as the iron molecules might bind to protein in the tissue which act as some furnish against decomposition process and make it possible under these particular conditions that soft tissues to be lasting for millions of years.
Thank you in advance! God bless
I wish more theists were like you, actually looking up stuff and learning from it. Yes, the soft tissue preservation can happen under the circumstances that you have stated, it is very rare, but Mary Schweitzer who found the T-Rex one that you speak of, has also found another one.
Ok there have been over 200 soft tissue finds now with secular ages of 65 mil to 500 million years old.. yes soft tissue is real but NO MARYS PAPER DOES NOT AND NEVER HAS PROVEN DEEP TIME. her paper is the furthest thing from actual science if you ask Me. It's got more holes in it then bidens morality. Also there are plenty other papers that totally disagree with her findings. Collagen and actin are just 2 of the protiens found in the soft tissue and we know for fact those can't last more then a few thousand years without breaking down completely. So no iron preservation is a lie a good excuse to push deep time but no it doesn't work
1st lie; the Ark was helped out by the state of TN and the local village. Under a program enacted by the Kentucky General Assembly in 2010, Ark Encounter investors applied for Economic Development Incentives that would allow them to recoup 25 percent of the project's construction costs by keeping a portion of the park's sales taxes during its first ten years of operation.[27] Receipt of the incentives would be contingent upon Ark Encounter meeting established performance goals upon opening.[28] A press release from Kentucky Governor Steve Beshear's office cited a feasibility study commissioned by Ark Encounter, LLC and conducted by consumer research corporation America's Research Group Limited, Inc.[28]
I'll keep it real simple for ya. The ark project was privately funded, not publicly funded.
@@johngagliardi8753 Yes and no. The construction was private. But AiG received a 25% credit for the costs of the construction from the State of TN.
I don't remember unicorns at the Ark, but I recently learned about the Siberian Unicorn, which was a massive rhinoceros-like creature during the ice age.
Fantasic presentation !
wish i could visit the ark encounter and also the real ark in east turkey !
Has anyone at the creation museum been out to the real ark ark ?
i have been following their progress since the beginning of finding it !
Bill Nye the science guy hummm... you would think he would do more scientific research.
He's a television entertainer not an actual scientist looking for truth, he only goes off of atheist propaganda of irrational thinking about the world rather than searching for the truth.
@@alexdrake8079
Bill has a degree in engineering, specifically, mechanical engineering. There is no propaganda in what he says as it isn't backed up by a poorly written, laughable screed. The very science that he shows is what makes our society progress, religion doesn't. Religion is the opiate of the masses who are too stupid to think for themselves.
@@alexdrake8079 Yes he is a paid performer. He is like a trained seal. They throw fish in his mouth and he swallows them whole.
Just as you know you are going to heaven I know I am going to heaven and I know the creation and ark stories are myth. You do not need to believe in literal creation stories to be saved.
This is how Noah fit all the animals on the ark;
God told Noah to bring the SEED of every creature upon the ark as well as two of every unclean, and seven of every clean animal.
They were stuck on the ark for a year, so every, very young animal had a year to grow. Growth was retarded due to the cool darkness of the ark during that year the waters were receding. So some animals hibernated, others were inactive with slowed metabolism, therefore, slowed appetite.
Just before being released, many animals were artificially inseminated so that they gave birth shortly after leaving the ark to give them a headstart. Smaller animals, like rodents, which could serve as food for larger animals also mate frequently and have huge numbers of offspring at once. The offspring grow quickly and procreate rapidly.
The flood was above the tops of the highest mountains, so it was global. Everything upon the Earth, every soul died! Only those on the ark survived. This is why the SEED of sea creatures and birds survived in spite of the rain and flood.
Just so you know, water freezes at around 8,000 feet. So the ark is floating on 21,000 feet of ice? Sure.
You made all that up, didn’t you?
Oh geeze
@@JB-yb4wn No. The geography of the antediluvian earth was far different than today's. There were no high mountains. There was one continent Pangaea or The Garden of Eden. It didn’t exist 350 million years ago but 6,000. The transformation of the earth was due to a worldwide CATASTROPHE. In this the high mountains rose for the first time. Like Titicata @ 10,000 feet still supports oceanic life forms.
This is just nonsense
How? It explains more of how we got the fossil record rather than how science explains which it doesn't explain how millions of animals died across the planet because if everything died at once from a global catastrophe then how could there still be life on this planet?
@@alexdrake8079
Alex, you know nothing.
@@JB-yb4wn Apparently I know much more than you do here because all you are doing is repeating the same opinions from other scientists when they still don't understand the laws of nature because if those dinosaurs would have died a natural death then animals and bacteria would have broken down the body long before they would have been buried into ground. There's no way that all of these creatures buried in the ground could have stayed around for millions of years yet still be preserved so well that we can see and touch them. Those fossils would have to be buried in the ground when they were alive at a very rapid rate of time for the fossils of their bodies to be preserved so well in ground.
@@JB-yb4wn Look inside yourself.
I took my family to the Ark Encounter and Creation museum last year. They were AMAZING! Thank you Answers in Genesis for helping me shape my children's worldview according to Scripture.
Would love to have any or all of your books, but being unemployed, I don't have enough money to purchase.
That’s a blessing in disguise, there’s actual science books in your local library for free that would be much more worth your time to read and won’t rot your brain like the books you want do :)
@@EmmaLaughland
Yes, but that would take up valuable window licking time and just simply isn't an option.
I don't understand why some people don't understand how many animals were on the ark. are we forgetting that it was God Himself that sent the animals to Noah to keep them alive. Therefore there would have been the right number of animals, since God Himself chose and sent them to Noah.
Needed this today . So many struggles and problems. I needed some God.
I don't believe that there were dinosaurs on the ARK.
They could have came on the ark as babies which most reptiles grow much slower than any other animal so I believe grew bigger over years time. Dinosaurs aren't fully grown within a year like most mammals
@@alexdrake8079
Alex, again your ignorance is truly at a stellar level. The dinosaurs died out some 65 million years ago.
@@JB-yb4wn We don't know that for sure because those dinosaurs had to be buried quickly for fossils to be preserved so well that those fossils wouldn't be there anymore even if they were 65 millions years old and we probably wouldn't have any fossil fuel today if the Earth was even close to that old
I don’t believe it either because there was no ark.
@@davidgardner863 They found the Ark on Mt. Ararat in Turkey. That's a good opinion tho
Agree, a firm foundation protects when the winds and waves come in
Says the braintrust who knows nothing about naval architecture.
Science confirms & proves the Bible
as a christian. tell me your sources because im dying to know
@@sandosam807 The Bible. God created everything, Scientist give them their names, but God set everything in place. Job chapters 38 - 42 is a perfect one, where God says "Where were you when I laid the foundations of the Earth?" (38:4) "Look, now at the behemoth, Which I made along with you; He eats grass like an ox. See now, his strength is in his hips. And his power is in his stomach muscles. He moves his tail like a cedar; . . " (40:15) To me that is a stegosaurus - what animal fits that description. Hippo & elephant have small tails. These Chapters in Job are full of them. Psalm 19 is another, there are many more, throughout the Bible. I will let you check these & many more. May God bless your interest in Him
@@michellecollins6193
Oh you mean the Earth that doesn't move and has a glass dome over it? We talking about that biblical Earth? Because if we are, your god is laughingly wrong here.
@@JB-yb4wn The Bible doesn't say that. God created everything, He hung the earth, stars & moon in space. He created the sky, sea & earth, & everything on & in them. so I don't understand where you get the glass dome & that the earth doesn't move. How do you think He created gravity, by spinning the earth & put it orbit
An elephant’s tail sways like a cedar, Job doesn’t say how big it was.
Here are a couple of items that you might want to try and explain. If the water got higher than all the high mountains, then why didn't the water freeze solid, along with the ark and all of the creatures that were supposed to be in it? Were all of the mountains a lot shorter then then now? Ok, while you are contemplating that one, here is another. Since everything was covered with water, how did the inhabitants of the ark breathe? Everybody knows that the plants that grow on the planet are where the oxygen comes from. Get real. I heard one bible expert say that the water was on the Earth for 13 months. Surely any excess oxygen would have depleted by then. You would think that God who is supposed to know everything, would have known all about that stuff but likely the inhabitants of the Earth at that time did not know those things, and they are really who wrote the scriptures, or possibly Moses who was probably ignorant of those things also.
There were no mountains before the global flood because the mountains were formed from the flood
And you know this How?@@alexdrake8079
@@alexdrake8079, How? Magic?
@@davidgardner863 Water came bursting through the ground splitting parts of the Earth and water plus mud were building up then land moving up on top of each other to form those mountains. Makes more sense than anything science says about how mountains formed 😆
@@alexdrake8079 , And that water came bursting up at 2000 degrees from the mantle and boiled everything in the ocean and melted the crust. Yup.
Adam and Eve is mythical figures so is noah
So Santa Claus and the Easter bunny are real?
but here you are watching the video
Trevor is mythical
@@dynamo6796 Ideological train wrecks have always fascinated me. Perverse, yes, but enthralling nonetheless.
So do you know who the first humans were then? Because humans couldn't have evolved from animals especially since no animal has ever given birth to a human like your evolution says lol 😆
You could fool some people some of the time, but you can't fool all the people all the time, the bible is a book of allegories
The bible is the most accurate book in the world. Search: What is the most accurate book in the world. Ok? Also did everything that we witness on earth just appear naturally out of nowhere like magic ✨?
@@christianpulido8360
What is the most accurate book in the world?
It's challenging to determine the single most accurate book in the world, as accuracy can be subjective and depends on the context. Different books serve different purposes and cover various topics. Additionally, the accuracy of information can change over time as new discoveries are made, and perspectives evolve.
In terms of religious beliefs, followers often consider their sacred texts, such as the Bible, Quran, or Bhagavad Gita, to be the most accurate and authoritative. However, these texts are matters of faith and interpretation.
In the realm of scientific knowledge, textbooks and academic publications are generally designed to present accurate information based on current understanding and evidence. Yet, even in science, theories and models can be revised as new information emerges.
For historical accuracy, reputable historical accounts and well-researched non-fiction works are often considered reliable sources. However, historians may have different interpretations of events.
In the end, the concept of the "most accurate" book is highly dependent on the field of knowledge and the criteria used for evaluation. It's essential to consider multiple sources, critically evaluate information, and stay open to updates and revisions based on ongoing research and discovery.
There you go. The bible is a matter of faith and interpretation - SUBJECTIVE accuracy. Chatgpt is so cool.
@@christianpulido8360, Isn’t that what you believe?
@@davidgardner863 No, God forbids magic and you would know that if you read the Bible.
@@davidgardner863 God talked things into existence.