Back on the Grind | Pioneer Golgari Midrange: League #49

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น •

  • @neotsundoku
    @neotsundoku ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Glad to see you back

  • @rosssmith8521
    @rosssmith8521 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The return of the king!

  • @zeichen95
    @zeichen95 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    It has a lot of similarities in the Standard Golgari Midrange build, only stronger cards like Thoughtseize and Bankbuster added.

    • @DumpsterCat
      @DumpsterCat  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I didn’t realize that, thanks for pointing it out!

  • @megatherium4194
    @megatherium4194 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I dont know what I should think of archfiend if we have to deal with Heartless act on opponent sides?

    • @DumpsterCat
      @DumpsterCat  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s a good point, but that’s only one removal spell in the whole format. If we see it game one against Rakdos though, cutting archfiend would be advised

  • @jessicalundholm2773
    @jessicalundholm2773 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Happy to see you back! What are your thoughts about Preacher of the Schism? Do you think it's worth playing in this deck?

    • @DumpsterCat
      @DumpsterCat  ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks Jessica! I haven’t tested Preacher yet, but it looks like it could be quite powerful - lots of grindy potential! I’d say it’s definitely worth testing out, but I’m not sure it’d be strictly better than sentinel, trespasser, or glissa.

  • @rosssmith8521
    @rosssmith8521 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Any chance you would get into Timeless on Arena? Deathrite and fetches are legal, just saying...

    • @DumpsterCat
      @DumpsterCat  ปีที่แล้ว

      Dude that format looks really fun! I’d have to save up some more wildcards but I’m sure id play some sort of lurrus rock list with dark rituals and everything broken you can think of

  • @rdm5687
    @rdm5687 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I know It's the randomest question ever, but if Eldraine's Garruk were 5 CMC instead of 6, would you play it in this deck? I love that card but man, so expensive...

    • @DumpsterCat
      @DumpsterCat  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah that card would be a lot more playable at 5 mana. It’s a powerhouse!