That guitar was on loan from the Gibson museum and because of that scene, they have vowed to never lend out another piece to anyone ever again. It was one of (either a kind or of like five) in the world and was essentially priceless.
@@lllxVxlll Quentin Tarantino convinced them to do it on the basis of being very considerate and careful not to damage the original guitar. Hence why they made a fkin vow to never lend anything again
Pre-internet days - I read an interview with the owners of the home used for the dinner scene in "Heartburn" (IIRC). Because they signed the papers, they were for all intents and purposes, thrown out of their house for a week. The construction of their home was altered at the bone-level to accommodate the tons of equipment required to shoot the scene. Apparently, nothing was restored, and when the owners protested, they were told in no uncertain terms, "Use the check we wrote you." Movie makers are just barkers and mountebanks with access to increased technology.
Yeah the Gibson museum sadly learned this the hard way and will not lend out another guitar for Hollywood. I dont get why you even needs the historical artifact, Hollywood prop makers are incredibly talented and aging a guitar to make it look just like an original would be ao easy for them. Aging stuff is like FX 101.
🎼🎵the prop director 🎵he was sleeping 🎶 now his guitar is gently weeping 🎼🎵look at Tarantino he's definitely creepy 🎶with this mistake we should be learning 🎼🎼🎸🪕🎸🎺🎹🎸🎬 And cut !
Well if he didn't break it and the scene went as planned (switch in a fake to break) during the press run for the movie the actors probably would mention that they got to use an actual correct guitar thanks to Martin Guitar Museum. Basically giving Martin Museum some advertising.
why? maybe she didint care about much but she cared about music and guitars? that was actually great because it shows that even a villian like her can have soft side too, its not like she needs to be peaceful all movie, her character was crazy and that was accurate reaction
You're right. It doesn't fit with the scene or character at all and seems like totally misplaced acting and tamber of her voice, sounds disingenuous to the character. I guess they felt they HAD to use that cut because it was THE guitar, but it's a bad cut honestly.
Fun fact: no one knew this guitar was special in anyway when watching the movie, so why did Quentin have a real historical guitar on set? Just use a cheap reproduction. A piece of history was destroyed in a pointless manner.
cause it’s a movie. quentin wanted a historical guitar from the same period the movie was set in. the guitar was meant to be switched out but (probably on purpose) quentin didn’t ask for it to be switched out. now the martin museum won’t loan any out to anyone.
@@qaiszawaideh6968 i wish they didnt destroy the martin, to be honest the truth is, they DID make a reproduction, and that was the one they intended to smash. it was off camera though, and they forgot to switch it out before shooting the smash
Knowing Tarantino actually strangled Diane Kruger in Inglorious Basterds bc he wanted “a real strangle look”, he definitely did this on purpose to get a stronger reaction from the actress. He’s crazy.
Actually it wasn't because Quentin Tarantino wanted it to be a real strangle look it was because the actor refused to strangle her because he didn't want to hurt her so Quentin Tarantino stepped in and did it himself he literally says it in an interview
@@stevemiller. yeah, but you can always drive a parked car. When some idiot wraps it around a pole, it's gone forever, for no benefit. Someone could've played the guitar, and now it's gone for no reason.
@@internetbodhi1009 things get wrecked it happens. It doesnt have the same value to me as it does to the next guy. Though on the other hand i could get offered 20k for my car and turn it down. Its not all about money to some people either.
@@stevemiller. it's not about money, it's about respecting the item and not being a selfish asshole denying the one remaining example to everyone else in the world, and everyone who will ever exist in the future. Sure, I can go put the Mona Lisa through a paper shredder. There's pictures online. There's movies about it, there's articles and knowledge and it won't be forgotten. But destroying it denies everyone else the life experience or potential to appreciate the physical object. It denies the ability to actually make a creative work with it ever again. If someone had a really nice, commemorative song that they wanted to play with the guitar, now they can't, because some fucktard (QT, props, whoever) thought it'd be cool to destroy the real one when a fake would've worked all the same. There is no gain to destroying a historical piece when a substitute would've done just as much. And to anyone that argues "exposure" or "but now there's a story" that is the saddest excuse for the perversion of advertising and clout chasing I've ever seen. We might as well destroy the Pyramids for a movie, or wreck Caroll Shelby's car to promote Nascar. Fuck that.
I would bet that was a nice copy and QT was smart enough to pretend that it was indeed the real McCoy for true authentic suprise reaction. Thats how the best squeeze out cinematic gold. Just my 2 cents.
@@jtnawroc4 yea same as the other comment, it was legit the real guitar and the company vowed to never loan another thing again because it was priceless
Quinton knew EXACTLY what he was doing.. He wanted the most authentic reaction.. Unfortunately, They said they will never loan out another guitar again.
This is like instructions at my work. They're perfectly clear except the fact they leave out important details that they tell you about AFTER you've already fucked up.
Well it had a good life in a long run in a world famous celebrity like Kurt Russell got to smash it up like the who or Nirvana would have done..!!! A guitar was made before punk was even thought of but it ended its life in a very punk sort of way, lol
Let's be honest, if they switch to the prop that was suppose to be smashed. You wouldn't have known it was an 145 year old guitar until you read it online somewhere. Having Kurt Russel smashing the real guitar was the best accident to happen
Wow. That really shed a new light on her reaction in that movie 🤣 I always thought it was a little strange how upset she got over the guitar getting broken.
Oh god I have my grandpas guitar from 1946 (it’s a harmony archtop) and I treat it like it holds my soul, I would’ve actually cried. And that one’s way older and more precious 😭😭😭
@@tsrenis You think i''m "edgy" because i have the mental capacity of an adult and don't believe that a silly chunk of wood and metal holds a soul? Maybe you shouldn't self project you fragile little edgelord. It must suck to have no control of when you think using logic and reason over irrational, emotional thinking.
Wow that's actually terrible. A piece of history lost forever. Edit: people stop commenting that (1) it's not lost, it's on camera; (2) it's worth it because it's part of a movie; (3) it's an old guitar wHo CaReS. You're not original, everything has been said.
More like a piece of history encased in a film that will be viewed by waaaay more people than who would have visited the museum. It also had it's strings played as opposed to being in museum glass unheard by anyone.
Funny part was her reaction was completely out of character and ruined the scene. Gotta put it in the movie though otherwise it was even more pointless 😂😂😂
@@ashdmack Unequivocally! I know for a fact ,they were all told there were two different guitars! The art dept ,”picture guitar”,hero guitar and the prop off screen guitar was something they went over with the cast over and again! He simply wasn’t listening or paying attention in the production meeting about that situation! Something everyone else on set knew and was aware of! I was told from a friend who was a PA on that shoot that He simply forgot! My original comment literally came from myself being a professional guitarist and collector since 2003 who specifically had knowledge of the incident!
@@thisguy6426 Trust me on that set this was never a “prop to the Art department! It was known as the” Hero Guitar” and the “Picture guitar” Everyone on set was briefed about this period correct piece of art!
Yeah it’s really shitty of Tarantino to let the scene carry on. Priceless piece of history smashed for a “reaction” that doesn’t even make sense for Daisys character. So dumb.
@@BrianBrianBrianBrianBrian it was just a guitar. In 1000 years no one will give a fuck about it. In 1000 years no one will give a fuck about the Mona Lisa.
Also it’s not even just how old it was, it’s the quality. People today, even with modern tooling and technology, can’t recreate the quality and sound of PreWar Martin Guitars. They are exceptional items, they’re not just some old guitar. It’s like smashing a Rembrandt for no other reason than to get a “genuine” reaction out of the actress. And it wasn’t even worth it lol, in the scene she immediately breaks character and looks over at the Tarantino(I assume)
That guitar is currently being rebuilt painstakingly by hand, splinter by splinter. The actress later received a Washburn and she expressed her dismay after being allowed to take the Gibson home everyday playing it for hours "you can't go to a Washburn after playing an 1860 Gibson, it's really rough!"
No, same as Alec Baldwin; the actors should have been trained and given notice of the tools used in the shoot, in this case, a priceless artifact. No mercy for Alec B.
@@jimthompson8947 alec is at fault because a gun is a gun is a gun. Kurt just smashed a guitar. Alec knew it was firing blanks. It isn't exactly a fucking secret that a blank firing weapon is able to kill. But there was no way for Kurt to know that guitar was the real deal unless someone told him it was. That is just on Quinton.
@@saltymcginger2027 I think you didn’t read the Alec Baldwin case too closely. Somebody put a live round into the gun, hence why it travelled through two people. A blank can only kill at point-blank range.
Kurt tells Quentin he gonna smash and so he SMASH! 💥 Later studio sits down with him and Quentin - 'Alright fellas about the damaged Gibson 🎸, we are here trying to decide on who's tab should we charge it before releasing your respective payments! ' Kurt - 'I SWEAR TO GOD! IT WAS.. ' Quentin - 'Damn shame that was such a priceless piece and Yeah it was all his idea, I told him not to do it and that it was a bad idea for sure! You remember that Kurt I tried to warn, and you wouldn't listen! Now look what you got us into? Kurt Hysterically - 😵 WOOAAH.. WOOAAH.. WWOOOAAAAHHH.. !!
Yeah it does. If the replica was that good, he could've just told JJL that it was the real one in order to get the reaction but he seems like that much of an ego maniac. Not that I condone lying ever but I don't think honesty is a trait/moral common in Hollywood to begin with. 🤔
Too all the people saying we lost a piece of history you are right, but we gained a piece of history at the same time. This movie will live on longer than that guitar ever would've
It was NOT a Gibson Acoustic (not that there’s anything wrong with a Gibson)….but in actuality it was a MARTIN GUITAR 🎸 on loan from The Martin Guitar Factory in Nazareth, PA.
I really don’t understand the purpose of having the real guitar on set. Why would they request that? The museum had every right to vow to never let Hollywood borrow a guitar again. It’s like that Marilyn Monroe dress Kim Kardashian wore that didn’t even fit her, just use the replica the whole time no one would fucking know you are ruining history for no reason other than to be a part of history as someone who destroyed the thing. Not Kurt Russels fault though, in my eyes Tarantino is responsible.
@@gordonilaoa1275 Yeah, I'm not saying QT wasn't in the wrong, but if the museum didn't even really care then why does this guy? It's like a 5 or 10 thousand dollar guitar, much worse has happened to make a movie. People have literally died making movies.
Ugh. I get Tarantino wanted the reaction- good idea- but he could’ve lied to the actress and told her it was real with a fake- then he’d get a real reaction, but avoid destruction, and neither her nor Kurt would feel guilty long term.
Also the reaction sucks(not her fault at all). She breaks character and looks over at the director. Actors are able to ACT, it’s in the job description lol. If Tarantino wants genuine reactions for things maybe he should just start actually cutting people’s ears off and thrusting syringes through their sternums. GENUINE!
@@fromthebackseat4865 Fr. He always hires top of the line leads, so he should realize they’re good enough to make it totally convincing- if they weren’t he wouldn’t have hired them.
yeah but he could have gotten that same effect with a prop guitar. Not likely the actors would've been able to tell the difference, so he could have just lied and said the prop was the real guitar.
@@kor57 yea agreed. But maybe he thought he wouldn’t be able to get everyone who knew to lie well enough to have her convinced. Either way though I think it’s horrible and was absolutely not worth destroying a priceless guitar.
I don’t think ego maniac is the right term. I don’t think he gives a shit about ego, however he does care about a genuine reaction on set to make a better film. Even if he has to sacrifice a relic to get it
A movie production offered all the guys on my lake to rent their boats for a movie, i had a feeling and said no but a bunch of guys said yes, the money was pretty good...they damaged every single boat. They paid for repairs but boats were in the shop for a year.
Quentin makes movies that are more akin to art or a physiological experience. I wouldn’t trade his films for the world, yet I would be lying if I said hearing about this smashed guitar didn’t upset me. Rip to a piece of musical history
I remember hearing this story told by someone else, but in that version Kurt was all upset after her learned that he destroyed a priceless guitar. Watching this, he looks like he didnt give a shit lmao.
He doesn't know anything about guitars (I'm just stating the obvious) and at first he probably thought he broke a one of a kind piece of history. By this point he probably learned that it wasn't really anything special, and that there is still an abundance of those guitars. You can buy an 1875 Martin for about $5,000.
@@TheMrModders You can't buy a museum quality Martin from 1975 for 5 grand, let alone 1875. You are delusional. The guitar was only insured for the price Martin originally paid to acquire it for their museum, which was $40,000. It's actual value at the time of the incident would have likely been 20 times that or more.
@@paulchilders9969 Do you want to buy one? Im so delusional that I will sell you one of those guitars for $400,000. That's 50% off for you and you could just flip it to double your money. What do you say? You want one?
Fucking infuriating that the real guitar from the Gibson Museum was allowed to be destroyed. Whoever even thought it was necessary to have the real deal on set deserves hell to pay
This is exactly why you don't put anything valuable in the actor's hands actors are literally children who are good at pretending to be other people they really don't know much about the world around them just look at that 1 guy who shot someone cause he didn't even have the presence of mind to check if a gun was loaded they really got to stop giving these actors real stuff. Why on Earth would you use a 145 year old guitar as a prop. As someone who plays the guitar and collects them that honestly broke my heart to hear how that guitar went out. It definitely deserved better than that.
Well there are people on set that get paid specifically to make sure things like expensive antiques getting smashed or people getting shot doesn't happen. If everyone did THEIR job and stop relying on others to do it for them then it would be a lot smoother huh? Accidents happen though, can't be perfect %100 of the time. It's sad, and sad things happen but an accident is an accident. The joy of being human
Imagine the ego on a director to think his art is worth the destruction of another historical art piece even when the movie hasn't even come out yet. Jfc
Someone over two centuries ago made that… and never would have believed people who have gone to space and talk instantly from one side of the globe to another would play it. And in a matter of seconds. It would be played for the last time. And broken.
The whole thing was a stunt. There’s absolutely no reason whatsoever for that guitar to be on set. Authenticity isn’t an issue in this day and age. I bet if you dug deeper you’d find the answer.
The answer is that Quentin is just kind of a jerk. Lol. He makes good films(most of the time) but he’ll take things too far if he thinks it’ll make for a “genuine” reaction. And in this case it didn’t even do that because the actress immediately breaks character and looks over at the director. Now there’s one fewer PreWar Martin Guitar in the world.
i think its funny how his name is kurt, just like kurt cobain, who would smash guitars for a living, and ironically was the owner of the two most expensive guitars in the world, with first most expensive also being a martin for 6 million dollars.
Ok for the gun thing most 80-90’s movies shot with real guns and some prop ones when used in firing scenes like terminator for instance it’s not the guns fault for shooting you can blame that one on bald win
@@tmac-hd8nb Yeah, it was 100% his fault. I get told off for lifting an airsoft rifle up slightly towards someone because, when dealing with weapons, it's always best to be safe than sorry!
Rest in peace brandon Lee and whoever the poor guy Alec Baldwin shot was ,I never followed up on that story… but accidents do happen even if everyone was doing their job perfectly that’s why when you’re working with stuff like that you have to always be a professional… it’s a dangerous line of work even though it’s supposed to all be fake. Even if they don’t die they can seriously be injured. Kane Hodder in the wicked witch of the west both had permanent fire scars from being set on fire working on set, God died making the twilight zone movie had chopped off by a helicopter, 2 kids too. Very sad all around. You really have to love movies to risk some shit like that
@@mrspicolli god died on the set of twilight zone the movie? You may wanna research that a bit more. Did you also say kane hodder played the wicked witch of the west and got burnt up? What the fuck are you talking about? Have you ever seen these movies?
And that's why they will never let any other movie borrow real stuff especially guitars or small ships or anything else because to me the director's really don't care about the real deal or maybe he just hated the guitar and said smash it anyways 🤷🏼♂️
@@LacoSinfonia, The value has been lost already. Gluing it together won’t restore it’s sound. The history was that it was 1 of 5 of it’s kind that had been *surviving*. Not completely destroyed and glued back together.
"Just calling in regards to when you'll be returning the guitar" Unfortunately it was broken on set and we will not be able to return it as promised "If it was damaged by accident, we have a guy that can fix it and restore it" ...uhm it was kind of obliterated and most of the pieces were swept up and thrown away 😧
Plot twist: They borrowed the real Gibson, made an exact replica of the Gibson. Used the replica in the scene, Destroyed the replica, all while the real Gibson is in Tarantinos red convertible waiting for him to ride off into the sunset 🌅
This all makes sense bcz in the end of the video he says. “I later found out it was the real Gibson, I guess” Implying they did have a replica on set. Mystery solved
Did a little digging found several articles on this. It is said that Martin claimed its value at around $40,000. So priceless is prob not the best word to use. For historical purposes it carried more value obviously.
Haha so Jennifer actually broke character (when she goes "whoah, whoah!" and looks to her right) but we don't realise it! That's pretty crazy. Very sad about the guitar though. It was a museum item essentially.
That guitar was on loan from the Gibson museum and because of that scene, they have vowed to never lend out another piece to anyone ever again. It was one of (either a kind or of like five) in the world and was essentially priceless.
It was Martin, not Gibson
Have they ever heard of super glue?
Bro why would they use a priceless guitar for a movie instead of a replica or some shit.
Martin
@@lllxVxlll Quentin Tarantino convinced them to do it on the basis of being very considerate and careful not to damage the original guitar.
Hence why they made a fkin vow to never lend anything again
Definitely Tarantino's fault or the propmaster's. Kurt Russell had no way of knowing
Yea he was told their was a replica that he would be destroying.
Both. Mostly Q. And the Martin chaperones for the relic.
Too many dumbass chiefs, not enough smart screen monkeys.
Always assume its loaded. Oh thats the murderer baldwin that got away scot free my bad
@@stevemiller. even as a troll comment, that's dumb
@@romilrh not a troll comment. He literally got away with murder but hey when ya gots the money honey
Knowing Quentin his line of thinking was "a prop wouldn't look the same" "i want real"
You don’t know him…
@@marleynettles5530 you dont know that
🤣 lol.. so true
@@marleynettles5530 lmao watch any of his interviews though 🤣 It’s certainly a character trait he openly gives off
There is a chance you might be right🤣
This is why you never EVER lend out real historical objects to movie makers.
Pre-internet days - I read an interview with the owners of the home used for the dinner scene in "Heartburn" (IIRC). Because they signed the papers, they were for all intents and purposes, thrown out of their house for a week. The construction of their home was altered at the bone-level to accommodate the tons of equipment required to shoot the scene. Apparently, nothing was restored, and when the owners protested, they were told in no uncertain terms, "Use the check we wrote you."
Movie makers are just barkers and mountebanks with access to increased technology.
Yeah the Gibson museum sadly learned this the hard way and will not lend out another guitar for Hollywood.
I dont get why you even needs the historical artifact, Hollywood prop makers are incredibly talented and aging a guitar to make it look just like an original would be ao easy for them. Aging stuff is like FX 101.
Aye buddy you survived your stroke?
Or have someone from the museum go with the piece and let the filmmakers commission an exact replica and label it as the replica heavily.
Or this is why you realize that nothing lasts forever and move on
I love Kurt, “Whaddya mean real guitar, they’re all real.”
He’s my favorite actor
Reminds me of Jack Burton 🤣
Another “actor” like Baldwin. No sense of reality or REAL values
Yeah really who cares. A guitar is a guitar
🎼🎵the prop director 🎵he was sleeping 🎶 now his guitar is gently weeping 🎼🎵look at Tarantino he's definitely creepy 🎶with this mistake we should be learning 🎼🎼🎸🪕🎸🎺🎹🎸🎬 And cut !
Why was there a museum piece on set? They could have made a copy, it's not like anyone would notice!
Well if he didn't break it and the scene went as planned (switch in a fake to break) during the press run for the movie the actors probably would mention that they got to use an actual correct guitar thanks to Martin Guitar Museum. Basically giving Martin Museum some advertising.
@@quadzilla7572
Not worth it. The Gibson museum should have just allowed them to make a replica.
That's why you don't let an original on set.
@@bobfg3130 I agree. Just kinda giving my thoughts on why they would even lend a one of kind peice in the first place.
They had a dummy guitar built just to smash but they wanted the real one to play it and have the authentic sound
@@quadzilla7572 money
It makes her reaction make more sense, cuz I always thought Daisy overreacted when he smashed it
Same, she broke out of character
why? maybe she didint care about much but she cared about music and guitars? that was actually great because it shows that even a villian like her can have soft side too, its not like she needs to be peaceful all movie, her character was crazy and that was accurate reaction
You're right.
It doesn't fit with the scene or character at all and seems like totally misplaced acting and tamber of her voice, sounds disingenuous to the character.
I guess they felt they HAD to use that cut because it was THE guitar, but it's a bad cut honestly.
@@PostPandemicMadonna They were in the 1850s or something, That guitar was a regular one. She broke out of character from a non-caring lunatic
@@berzerkdude5755 Now that you mention it, she’s actually looking off screen when she says that , not at Kurt. Lol. I would never have noticed that.😂
You can see the genuine horror in her face as he smashes it. She even looks offset.
Fun fact: no one knew this guitar was special in anyway when watching the movie, so why did Quentin have a real historical guitar on set? Just use a cheap reproduction. A piece of history was destroyed in a pointless manner.
cause it’s a movie. quentin wanted a historical guitar from the same period the movie was set in. the guitar was meant to be switched out but (probably on purpose) quentin didn’t ask for it to be switched out. now the martin museum won’t loan any out to anyone.
@@bondedwithpotatoes0076 rpg is making a great point anyways, they could have just made a reproduction without having to destroy a piece of history
@@qaiszawaideh6968 i wish they didnt destroy the martin, to be honest
the truth is, they DID make a reproduction, and that was the one they intended to smash. it was off camera though, and they forgot to switch it out before shooting the smash
@@bondedwithpotatoes0076 "forgot" The Q man did not forget. He did that shit on purpose.
Quentin Tarantinos worst movie is objectively more important than some old ass guitar.
Knowing Tarantino actually strangled Diane Kruger in Inglorious Basterds bc he wanted “a real strangle look”, he definitely did this on purpose to get a stronger reaction from the actress. He’s crazy.
Actually it wasn't because Quentin Tarantino wanted it to be a real strangle look it was because the actor refused to strangle her because he didn't want to hurt her so Quentin Tarantino stepped in and did it himself he literally says it in an interview
Fuck yes he is. That's why we love him haha
Kinky.
Crazy brilliant!!
he’s a great director but i really hate him as a person
Damn, at least it wasn’t a gun and “fake” bullets.
You mean like Alec Baldwin on the set of Rust
...unless it was pointed at Tarrentino.
...........
I see what you did there.....
Well played, my friend. Well played.
😄😄😄
@@RebelAllianceJAC 😬
@@RebelAllianceJAC I don't even watch his movies anymore.
I love how dismissive and off handedly Kurt tells the story. "Come to find out, it was a real Gibson, I guess." I love that man!
I heard this story years ago. Such a sad ending to a guitar that was preserved so long.
It was probably intentional so they could use it as a story to promote the movie.
Well it was a waste having it sit too. Its like having a car you never drive.
@@stevemiller. yeah, but you can always drive a parked car.
When some idiot wraps it around a pole, it's gone forever, for no benefit.
Someone could've played the guitar, and now it's gone for no reason.
@@internetbodhi1009 things get wrecked it happens. It doesnt have the same value to me as it does to the next guy. Though on the other hand i could get offered 20k for my car and turn it down. Its not all about money to some people either.
@@stevemiller. it's not about money, it's about respecting the item and not being a selfish asshole denying the one remaining example to everyone else in the world, and everyone who will ever exist in the future.
Sure, I can go put the Mona Lisa through a paper shredder. There's pictures online. There's movies about it, there's articles and knowledge and it won't be forgotten.
But destroying it denies everyone else the life experience or potential to appreciate the physical object. It denies the ability to actually make a creative work with it ever again.
If someone had a really nice, commemorative song that they wanted to play with the guitar, now they can't, because some fucktard (QT, props, whoever) thought it'd be cool to destroy the real one when a fake would've worked all the same.
There is no gain to destroying a historical piece when a substitute would've done just as much. And to anyone that argues "exposure" or "but now there's a story" that is the saddest excuse for the perversion of advertising and clout chasing I've ever seen. We might as well destroy the Pyramids for a movie, or wreck Caroll Shelby's car to promote Nascar. Fuck that.
I mean, Kurt did tell the director he would do it if he didn't tell cut..I'm assuming the director knew it was real and just didn't care?
Tarantino knew
Yeah he said go ahead and smash it
I would bet that was a nice copy and QT was smart enough to pretend that it was indeed the real McCoy for true authentic suprise reaction. Thats how the best squeeze out cinematic gold. Just my 2 cents.
@@jtnawroc4 it was the real guitar on loan from the Gibson worth millions
@@jtnawroc4 yea same as the other comment, it was legit the real guitar and the company vowed to never loan another thing again because it was priceless
Quinton knew EXACTLY what he was doing.. He wanted the most authentic reaction..
Unfortunately, They said they will never loan out another guitar again.
The museum said they'd never loan anything to a movie again
That guy is not right in the head
He clearly did it on purpose
Don’t care though
Great movie
This is like instructions at my work. They're perfectly clear except the fact they leave out important details that they tell you about AFTER you've already fucked up.
Damn that means after almost 2 centuries she was the last person to play that guitar.
Actually it was Russell. He did a bang up job.
@@KISSTHECLOWN1 nice
@@KISSTHECLOWN1 I hear it was his audition for the El Kabong reboot. Shame no one told him it was a voice only role.
@@MinutesFromVegas 🤣
Well it had a good life in a long run in a world famous celebrity like Kurt Russell got to smash it up like the who or Nirvana would have done..!!! A guitar was made before punk was even thought of but it ended its life in a very punk sort of way, lol
Fucking tarantino.
After having some of his own props become legendary, it makes so little sense he would destroy a piece of history.
The best thing I can imagine, would be him loaning something of unimaginable value and it be treated the same way.
It's not that he doesn't lend them out, it's just the last time someone took his glowing case, shit got crazy
@@MolanLabe78 knowing Quentin that’s exactly what he would want lmao
It was a piece of history and now it’s pieces of history.
Let's be honest, if they switch to the prop that was suppose to be smashed. You wouldn't have known it was an 145 year old guitar until you read it online somewhere. Having Kurt Russel smashing the real guitar was the best accident to happen
Wow. That really shed a new light on her reaction in that movie 🤣 I always thought it was a little strange how upset she got over the guitar getting broken.
Oh god I have my grandpas guitar from 1946 (it’s a harmony archtop) and I treat it like it holds my soul, I would’ve actually cried. And that one’s way older and more precious 😭😭😭
It's all just pointless material in the end.
@@TurboNutterBastardwow edgy
@@tsrenis You think i''m "edgy" because i have the mental capacity of an adult and don't believe that a silly chunk of wood and metal holds a soul? Maybe you shouldn't self project you fragile little edgelord.
It must suck to have no control of when you think using logic and reason over irrational, emotional thinking.
Better hope Kurt won’t barge in and say “MUSIC TIMES OVER”
@@TurboNutterBastardso is this movie.
Wow that's actually terrible. A piece of history lost forever.
Edit: people stop commenting that (1) it's not lost, it's on camera; (2) it's worth it because it's part of a movie; (3) it's an old guitar wHo CaReS. You're not original, everything has been said.
95% percent of all historical pieces get destroyed over time friend this aint new
No one knew that the guitar was important until it was smashed in the making of a great movie if anything that adds to its value
@@dolphinerofachero3159 settle down. It's a guitar brand- not Alexander's sword...
More like a piece of history encased in a film that will be viewed by waaaay more people than who would have visited the museum. It also had it's strings played as opposed to being in museum glass unheard by anyone.
Funny part was her reaction was completely out of character and ruined the scene. Gotta put it in the movie though otherwise it was even more pointless 😂😂😂
Love her looking around at the crew like "guys wtf?!"
I think I’d manage maybe one or two “whoa!”s, then I’d hurl.
The sound designer of the movie said tarantino was smiling when the guitar was smashed. He knew.
After all these years Jennifer Jason Leigh still has that whoa😳factor!!!
As a professional guitarist and collector It was irresponsible at best!
That piece is forever gone!
Is it...?
@@ashdmack if you destroy something then yes it is forever gone or never to be returned to its original state.
Who are you calling irresponsible tho?
The actor?
The prop guy?
@@ashdmack Unequivocally!
I know for a fact ,they were all told there were two different guitars!
The art dept ,”picture guitar”,hero guitar and the prop off screen guitar was something they went over with the cast over and again!
He simply wasn’t listening or paying attention in the production meeting about that situation!
Something everyone else on set knew and was aware of!
I was told from a friend who was a PA on that shoot that He simply forgot!
My original comment literally came from myself being a professional guitarist and collector since 2003 who specifically had knowledge of the incident!
@@thisguy6426 Trust me on that set this was never a “prop to the Art department!
It was known as the” Hero Guitar” and the “Picture guitar” Everyone on set was briefed about this period correct piece of art!
It was an 1800s Martin and they vowed to never allow another guitar be used in hollywood
Like ANY guitar,ever? Because that seems hard to enforce. Is that even legal?
Forgive me it came from the Martin guitar museum and they vowed never to allow one be borrowed again
@@UltraGinormous sounds reasonable to me after the fact.
@@UltraGinormous more legal than breaking a fucking relic for a movie
They actually say that when you take a factory tour.
If that guitar was shaped liked a foot, he wouldn't have let it get smashed....
😂😂😂 he'd pull it out during his bathroom breaks and sniff it
From that day on, nobody would ever lend a priceless guitar for a movie directed by Quentin Tarantino.
Yeah it’s really shitty of Tarantino to let the scene carry on. Priceless piece of history smashed for a “reaction” that doesn’t even make sense for Daisys character. So dumb.
I was wondering if that reaction was even in-line since she essentially broke character.
Just a guitar
@@tmac-hd8nb Just a 150 year old peice of history list forever
@@tmac-hd8nb was absolutely not "just a guitar". It was a piece of history.
@@BrianBrianBrianBrianBrian it was just a guitar.
In 1000 years no one will give a fuck about it.
In 1000 years no one will give a fuck about the Mona Lisa.
I thought it was Martin, and I think Quentin did it on purpose.. a douche move as the museum won't be allowing anyone else to do it
"music time's over!"
so fitting. makes the whole thing even more hilarious
There's something profound about saying "they're all real." No matter how easly your equipment can be replaced, treat it with respect.
Sad it had to go like that after living for almost 150 years
Also it’s not even just how old it was, it’s the quality. People today, even with modern tooling and technology, can’t recreate the quality and sound of PreWar Martin Guitars. They are exceptional items, they’re not just some old guitar. It’s like smashing a Rembrandt for no other reason than to get a “genuine” reaction out of the actress. And it wasn’t even worth it lol, in the scene she immediately breaks character and looks over at the Tarantino(I assume)
@@fromthebackseat4865 agreed truly sad it's gone forever now never to be recreated again
"Living"
@@65firered was wondering if anyone would catch on to that haha
Living? lol
Let's be honest. Tarantino definitely did that on purpose.
Fr!
That guitar is currently being rebuilt painstakingly by hand, splinter by splinter. The actress later received a Washburn and she expressed her dismay after being allowed to take the Gibson home everyday playing it for hours "you can't go to a Washburn after playing an 1860 Gibson, it's really rough!"
Not a gibson they didn't exist
"It was the real Gibson I guess"
Oh well when you say it like that-
This was Tarantino fault he should of switched guitars for the shoot.
He knew it was not a replica.
@@exu7325 exactly.
No, same as Alec Baldwin; the actors should have been trained and given notice of the tools used in the shoot, in this case, a priceless artifact. No mercy for Alec B.
@@jimthompson8947 alec is at fault because a gun is a gun is a gun. Kurt just smashed a guitar. Alec knew it was firing blanks. It isn't exactly a fucking secret that a blank firing weapon is able to kill. But there was no way for Kurt to know that guitar was the real deal unless someone told him it was. That is just on Quinton.
@@saltymcginger2027 I think you didn’t read the Alec Baldwin case too closely. Somebody put a live round into the gun, hence why it travelled through two people. A blank can only kill at point-blank range.
Tbh this seems like something Tarantino would do on purpose
100%
Kurt tells Quentin he gonna smash and so he SMASH! 💥
Later studio sits down with him and Quentin - 'Alright fellas about the damaged Gibson 🎸, we are here trying to decide on who's tab should we charge it before releasing your respective payments! '
Kurt - 'I SWEAR TO GOD! IT WAS.. '
Quentin - 'Damn shame that was such a priceless piece and Yeah it was all his idea, I told him not to do it and that it was a bad idea for sure! You remember that Kurt I tried to warn, and you wouldn't listen! Now look what you got us into?
Kurt Hysterically - 😵 WOOAAH.. WOOAAH.. WWOOOAAAAHHH.. !!
Yeah it does. If the replica was that good, he could've just told JJL that it was the real one in order to get the reaction but he seems like that much of an ego maniac. Not that I condone lying ever but I don't think honesty is a trait/moral common in Hollywood to begin with. 🤔
Aaawww, little Quenty would NEVER do dat to someone else's property.
lol
Indeed it does
Too all the people saying we lost a piece of history you are right, but we gained a piece of history at the same time. This movie will live on longer than that guitar ever would've
"Whoooops it was totally an accident..."
- Tarantino
Tarantino said it was the real gibson that was smashed just so he'd have the perfect alibi to steal the real one for himself without anyone noticing
It was NOT a Gibson Acoustic (not that there’s anything wrong with a Gibson)….but in actuality it was a MARTIN GUITAR 🎸 on loan from The Martin Guitar Factory in Nazareth, PA.
I live in nazareth, pa..this clip hurt to watch cuz i love him as an actor 😂
When I first heard about this, I felt like I had just been punched in the gut. I've been playing guitar for almost 50 years and that really hit me.
I love how he talks like he didn’t destroy a priceless piece of history
A part of me thinks this was Quentins plan all along
He got the reaction he was after. A huge sacrifice for a film to gain notoriety.
@@Cyclik813 She broke character immediately tho😅. Also why would they not just lie and tell her the replica was real to get the reaction
Much better than poor firearm control on the set! Hollywood issues……
Not much better though
@@TheRealDealBobbySteele A LOT better. People have died on set due to mistakes made with firearms.
a human life is worthless, but that Martin was priceless
@@swide2750 priceless? I bet they had insurance on it, priceless my ass.
@@zerodarklumens4843 we can make more people, can you create a 150 year old one of a kind instrument?
I tell you who's not at fault for this and that's the beautiful Kurt Russell.♥️
No he needed to check the prop before pulling the trigger.
@@JumboCod91 lmaooo
I really don’t understand the purpose of having the real guitar on set. Why would they request that? The museum had every right to vow to never let Hollywood borrow a guitar again. It’s like that Marilyn Monroe dress Kim Kardashian wore that didn’t even fit her, just use the replica the whole time no one would fucking know you are ruining history for no reason other than to be a part of history as someone who destroyed the thing. Not Kurt Russels fault though, in my eyes Tarantino is responsible.
That guitar was a 1800's Martin. Literally priceless...
Gibson......
@@swampdonkey67 nope
Makes me physically ill. QT knew what he was doing. All just to get a reaction from the actor.
Why do you have such a strong passion for an old Martin guitar. The museum didn't even care, why do you?
@@TheMrModders There are none so blind as those who cannot see.
@@TheMrModders the principle though… An agreement was made between the two parties which was literally shattered on screen.
@@Gravyballs2011 Correct.
Deaf people can't hear.
Its *refuse to see.
@@gordonilaoa1275 Yeah, I'm not saying QT wasn't in the wrong, but if the museum didn't even really care then why does this guy? It's like a 5 or 10 thousand dollar guitar, much worse has happened to make a movie. People have literally died making movies.
Kirt is a beast of an actor
Ugh. I get Tarantino wanted the reaction- good idea- but he could’ve lied to the actress and told her it was real with a fake- then he’d get a real reaction, but avoid destruction, and neither her nor Kurt would feel guilty long term.
Also the reaction sucks(not her fault at all). She breaks character and looks over at the director. Actors are able to ACT, it’s in the job description lol. If Tarantino wants genuine reactions for things maybe he should just start actually cutting people’s ears off and thrusting syringes through their sternums. GENUINE!
@@fromthebackseat4865 Fr. He always hires top of the line leads, so he should realize they’re good enough to make it totally convincing- if they weren’t he wouldn’t have hired them.
Tarantino probably made sure she knew and made sure he didn’t know so that he would smash it and she would give that 100% genuine reaction.
yeah but he could have gotten that same effect with a prop guitar. Not likely the actors would've been able to tell the difference, so he could have just lied and said the prop was the real guitar.
@@kor57 yea agreed. But maybe he thought he wouldn’t be able to get everyone who knew to lie well enough to have her convinced. Either way though I think it’s horrible and was absolutely not worth destroying a priceless guitar.
Tarantino is an absolute egomaniac who uses "the art of film" to justify his routinely insane and self serving behaviors
I don’t think ego maniac is the right term. I don’t think he gives a shit about ego, however he does care about a genuine reaction on set to make a better film. Even if he has to sacrifice a relic to get it
@@CLSGL nah, ego maniac is the right word. hop off tarantino’s dick. there’s making art, and then there’s going overboard
And that’s a beautiful thing
He's a feet guy, of course he's nuts
@@CLSGL her reaction ruined it. She spoke in her normal voice
Quentin 😂 you couldn't use a replica 😂😂😂he tricked Kurt Russell Into smashing a history instrument 😂 ohhh that killed me
The tone on that guitar was great. Sad its gone
I work in film and this kind of stuff happens all the time. I feel bad for any company loaning their items out
A movie production offered all the guys on my lake to rent their boats for a movie, i had a feeling and said no but a bunch of guys said yes, the money was pretty good...they damaged every single boat. They paid for repairs but boats were in the shop for a year.
Ppl seem to have started sleeping on Hateful Eight but it is a FANTASTIC movie
Quentin makes movies that are more akin to art or a physiological experience. I wouldn’t trade his films for the world, yet I would be lying if I said hearing about this smashed guitar didn’t upset me. Rip to a piece of musical history
I suspect Terantino knew and he gave Kurt the green light on purpose.
Yeah it was a Martin not a Gibson
Fr
Martin Co watching this interview: “Am I joke to you?”
For newer commenters, it was an 1870s Martin, Gibson wasn't even founded until 1902.
Without this guitar sacrifice, I would never know or care about this guitar.
Just amazing how disrespectful active or they don’t give a shit about other people’s property
I remember hearing this story told by someone else, but in that version Kurt was all upset after her learned that he destroyed a priceless guitar. Watching this, he looks like he didnt give a shit lmao.
Well how long is he supposed to grieve over a broken guitar, the rest of his life?
He doesn't know anything about guitars (I'm just stating the obvious) and at first he probably thought he broke a one of a kind piece of history. By this point he probably learned that it wasn't really anything special, and that there is still an abundance of those guitars. You can buy an 1875 Martin for about $5,000.
@@TheMrModders You can't buy a museum quality Martin from 1975 for 5 grand, let alone 1875. You are delusional. The guitar was only insured for the price Martin originally paid to acquire it for their museum, which was $40,000. It's actual value at the time of the incident would have likely been 20 times that or more.
@@paulchilders9969 Do you want to buy one? Im so delusional that I will sell you one of those guitars for $400,000. That's 50% off for you and you could just flip it to double your money. What do you say? You want one?
@@TheMrModders Sorry, not interested in fakes.
Piece of history for a piece of historic film lmao
It makes sense why she reacted like that now, like she was looking at the crew like "what the fuck" haha
All I see in the comments “it’s okay, it was a great scene.” - people who have never taken care of an instrument
And people who overestimate the longevity/importance of a movie
Just a guitar dude
@@tmac-hd8nb right mate
....just the one between their legs.
and that’s a piece of art and history gone in seconds
Fucking infuriating that the real guitar from the Gibson Museum was allowed to be destroyed. Whoever even thought it was necessary to have the real deal on set deserves hell to pay
T knew what he was doing. He's nuts. He knew. Why would the real guitar EVER be used on set? Use replicas.
You can see Jennifer looking at the crew when she said "Woah! Woah!" XD
When I first heard this, I couldn't help but wonder if it was a thinly veiled theft (the ol' switcheroo) or a type of money laundering.
Maybe Quentin has it in his mansion somewhere. Or maybe he sold it and gave the museum a cut.
Yeah, it was a movie- use props- the museum deserves it and they never should’ve lend out HISTORICAL items. It should’ve always been a thing
And Edward Norton ruined the Mona Lisa in Glass onion. These actors, man
I found out about this when it first happened. Still can’t believe it
This is exactly why you don't put anything valuable in the actor's hands actors are literally children who are good at pretending to be other people they really don't know much about the world around them just look at that 1 guy who shot someone cause he didn't even have the presence of mind to check if a gun was loaded they really got to stop giving these actors real stuff. Why on Earth would you use a 145 year old guitar as a prop. As someone who plays the guitar and collects them that honestly broke my heart to hear how that guitar went out. It definitely deserved better than that.
Well there are people on set that get paid specifically to make sure things like expensive antiques getting smashed or people getting shot doesn't happen. If everyone did THEIR job and stop relying on others to do it for them then it would be a lot smoother huh? Accidents happen though, can't be perfect %100 of the time. It's sad, and sad things happen but an accident is an accident. The joy of being human
I absolutely love the editing of the story here
Imagine the ego on a director to think his art is worth the destruction of another historical art piece even when the movie hasn't even come out yet. Jfc
Someone over two centuries ago made that… and never would have believed people who have gone to space and talk instantly from one side of the globe to another would play it.
And in a matter of seconds. It would be played for the last time.
And broken.
The whole thing was a stunt. There’s absolutely no reason whatsoever for that guitar to be on set. Authenticity isn’t an issue in this day and age. I bet if you dug deeper you’d find the answer.
The answer is that Quentin is just kind of a jerk. Lol. He makes good films(most of the time) but he’ll take things too far if he thinks it’ll make for a “genuine” reaction. And in this case it didn’t even do that because the actress immediately breaks character and looks over at the director. Now there’s one fewer PreWar Martin Guitar in the world.
145-year-old guitar and he describes the incident as if no shits are given
i think its funny how his name is kurt, just like kurt cobain, who would smash guitars for a living, and ironically was the owner of the two most expensive guitars in the world, with first most expensive also being a martin for 6 million dollars.
Nobody even knew this guitar existed until this happened. They should have collected the pieces and put it right back in the case with a story.
A good reason not to have real antiques (or GUNS) on any movie set.
Ok for the gun thing most 80-90’s movies shot with real guns and some prop ones when used in firing scenes like terminator for instance it’s not the guns fault for shooting you can blame that one on bald win
@@tmac-hd8nb Yeah, it was 100% his fault. I get told off for lifting an airsoft rifle up slightly towards someone because, when dealing with weapons, it's always best to be safe than sorry!
Yea, my favorite scene in the movie. Genuine reactions
And all it took was the destruction of a priceless artefact.
Reddit moment
For any 150 year old guitar to be smashed to pieces is a tragedy. For the 150 year old Rolls Royce of guitars, it's unbelievable.
Folks, it was a Martin guitar, not a Gibson. Gibson didn’t start making guitars until over decade after that Martin guitar was made.
Just like how they had those loaded guns on set too 😂
We’re talking about destroying a guitar vs actual negligence on the actors side and the prop teams side and the death of a person.
Rest in peace brandon Lee and whoever the poor guy Alec Baldwin shot was ,I never followed up on that story… but accidents do happen even if everyone was doing their job perfectly that’s why when you’re working with stuff like that you have to always be a professional… it’s a dangerous line of work even though it’s supposed to all be fake. Even if they don’t die they can seriously be injured. Kane Hodder in the wicked witch of the west both had permanent fire scars from being set on fire working on set, God died making the twilight zone movie had chopped off by a helicopter, 2 kids too. Very sad all around. You really have to love movies to risk some shit like that
@@mrspicolli god died on the set of twilight zone the movie? You may wanna research that a bit more. Did you also say kane hodder played the wicked witch of the west and got burnt up? What the fuck are you talking about? Have you ever seen these movies?
Makes me feel ill, like a hurt in the pit of my stomach…l
That’s a sign of diabetes, you should have that checked out...seriously.
Calm down.
"I felt like destroying something beautiful." -- Quentin
And that's why they will never let any other movie borrow real stuff especially guitars or small ships or anything else because to me the director's really don't care about the real deal or maybe he just hated the guitar and said smash it anyways 🤷🏼♂️
Honestly he has no idea what’s he’s done , that was a priceless piece of history
He admitted he later cried.
Dig deep or keep your shovel in the shed next to your unpowered devices where they do no harm to others.
Go glue it back together, then.
Didn’t here anybody crying then don’t here them now
@@tmac-hd8nb here you go
@@LacoSinfonia, The value has been lost already. Gluing it together won’t restore it’s sound. The history was that it was 1 of 5 of it’s kind that had been *surviving*. Not completely destroyed and glued back together.
"Just calling in regards to when you'll be returning the guitar"
Unfortunately it was broken on set and we will not be able to return it as promised
"If it was damaged by accident, we have a guy that can fix it and restore it"
...uhm it was kind of obliterated and most of the pieces were swept up and thrown away
😧
Everyone who still let this man handle a weapon that day should be charged. Clearly, he had a history of screwups.
Plot twist:
They borrowed the real Gibson, made an exact replica of the Gibson.
Used the replica in the scene, Destroyed the replica, all while the real Gibson is in Tarantinos red convertible waiting for him to ride off into the sunset 🌅
This all makes sense bcz in the end of the video he says. “I later found out it was the real Gibson, I guess”
Implying they did have a replica on set.
Mystery solved
Did a little digging found several articles on this. It is said that Martin claimed its value at around $40,000. So priceless is prob not the best word to use. For historical purposes it carried more value obviously.
Priceless means priceless for a reason. They don’t give a fuck about 40k versus the actual guitar.
Haha so Jennifer actually broke character (when she goes "whoah, whoah!" and looks to her right) but we don't realise it! That's pretty crazy.
Very sad about the guitar though. It was a museum item essentially.
Kurt shouldn’t have even been allowed to touch that guitar. Martin screwed up letting them use something that precious.
I always thought that overreaction was slightly out of character for her.
Wow, all that for a throwaway scene from his shittiest movie 😂
Just a guitar bro
@@tmac-hd8nb I want to do to you things the TH-cam community guidelines would not allow me to speak of.
@@tmac-hd8nb it's just a video bro, don't really need 15 comments of you crying on it but here we are 😂
@@charlesmason4493 I just like seeing how angry you guys get over one guy saying just a guitar seems to work very good 😂
@@tmac-hd8nb up to 18, good god man don't you have a family or friends?