thank you for sharing, i found out at a young age i was dyslexic, many have seen this as a disadvantage, but i always looked at it as i just needed a different learning style. i found i learn from a creative/practical way that helps me picture situations that i am learning about, having a daughter with dyslexia also i was able to help her think about her "disability " as an advantage as we see learning in a different way that can help us excel, i left school early feeling i couldnt learn their style and was feeling disadvantaged as they didnt know how to approach my type of learning, but since than i have found my own ways of learning which has finally brought me to begin for a bachelor's in my chosen field... in high school there was no way i could even think of going to uni, but im here! its enlightening to see that my concepts of learning has a researched professional stand also. thank you again
I found this video really useful and easy to understand. I am very interested in Multiple Intelligences theory but I had not heard about Successful Intelligence before and I find it very enriching. It is time that we start analysing intelligence in other terms.
This video was helpful not only to students but also for the teachers in dealing with his/her students. I cannot deny the fact that this video inspires me on how to teach the students effectively using differnt strategies.
thank you very much Robert! Useful information, charming way of sharing it and amazing research. Matías González Ibáñez. Psychologist and University Professor.
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:59 🧠 Successful intelligence is the ability to succeed in life by figuring out your goals and adapting to your environment, different from IQ which primarily measures analytical skills and knowledge. 02:50 🎓 Varying teaching methods to accommodate students' diverse strengths, such as creativity, analytical skills, and practicality, can lead to higher academic achievement. 06:16 🌍 Recognizing and accommodating different cultural backgrounds and conceptions of intelligence can positively impact students' academic performance. 08:59 🎓 College admissions should consider not only traditional standardized test scores but also creative, practical, and wisdom-based abilities to predict student success more accurately and reduce ethnic group differences. Made with HARPA AI
IQ, as one narrow definition of intelligence, in terms of achieving success of life, does not means too much. One needs more abilities to survive in a real life. Based on Sternberg's Triarchic Intelligence Theory, we all need to identify and develope all Big 3, - Analytical, Creative, and Practical Intelligence.
There are three variables between raw intelligence and it's practical application, namely; the processing power itself (IQ, roughly), what you choose to spend it on, and what your circumstances allow you to apply it to.
I found this video useful especially in my subject. The information discussed was great and as a future educator it makes such sense to apply it in a classroom teaching and learning process.
sir, I experienced what all you said absolutely correct with my own children and students. I want to point out one important factor that is some students have instinctive ability which cannot be explained with logic , still a matter of research. God bless you sir
This video was definitely stating the fact that teachers, parents and even students should learn to understand intelligence in a broad sense rather than to box it on the narrow concept of the IQ matter. IQ doesn't doesn't define who you are and what you can. Each of us have our own intelligence, know thy self!
Would it be possible that teaching different ways to a group of students is in fact effective not because of the different learning styles but instead due to the fact that the information has been repeated under different approaches (VARK)....Dual coding theory?
thanks for the great speech there. successful intelligence is not iq we get it pretty clear by the words. its very useful and i think that there should be a check on this along with conventional tests. the real mind,mature and social skills will greatly affect the cognitive behavior of any human. the whole psycological perception of a individual is show. differing from conventional theories this actually relates a individual to the best of his kind. so by saying successful intelligence we take in basic things 1)common sense 2) creativity these are key for overall development of a individual. saying the distinctness this successful intelligence is a way of perceiving things in different manner and thinking what can be a different end. so coming to psychological part in denies the way of iq and takes it into more understanding and problem solving way of life. so successful intelligence is moreover the psychology of person to take things in mind and processes it.
So is this a revision of the ~Triadic theory of intelligence, e.g. a Quadrilateral theory... Wouldn't successfulness be a subjective notion in the first place, a manifestation of cultural and personal ideology? Some aspects of success may be in competition, e.g. the acquisition of resources may come at a cost to personal health, relationships, or the production of offspring. If so, how would a balanced notion of success account for factors that were at odds?
Amazing how these folks who have these more forward thinking views of intelligence actually did poor on IQ tests. How did they acquire such achievement though? Evidently, there are gifted people that were diagnosed as average or below average intelligence. Amazing. The idiosyncratic models of intelligence explain how I went from a Russian orphanage to now being able to engage with folks who are clinically diagnosed as profoundly gifted and I can easily engage with them. Clearly, something is wrong.
Sternberg's analysis on ethnic groups is so ambiguous, that I'm forced to question if he says without explicitly stating it that certain ethnicities are less intelligent because they do poor on IQ tests. His frustrating analysis feels subtlety racist. Eskimo children have analytical intelligence. That is racist to think they don't have it. I'm suspecting that when theorists gets a person to infer racial differences in race and IQ, as Sternberg did, then the theorist needs to be put under the microscope to determine their racial views. He says that different cultures have patterns of different strengths. (Sounds essentialist) That is so ambiguous, he's asking for racists to use his successful intelligence theory to justify racism. He's trying to sound post racial, but his essentialist thinking disguised as acknowledging the differences of racial experiences is twisted. Brilliant but twisted. Distinct Racial experiences doesn't mean that racial groups possess differing levels of abstract intelligence. That is racist. In fact, I believe his theory will be used to engage in racist policies and laws to place nonwhite groups into "distinctly different educational contexts that places them in their strengths, due to their makeup.". Of course it's racist, but it will likely happen. I feel for Sternberg. Because he will become another person used to justify racial systems.
It took someone of these credentials to express axiomatic statements of this caliber?... When you speak to someone, like, say, Jordan B. Peterson...let me know.
Analytical intelligence is more useful to maintain a western-style society. So IQ scores are still the golden standard. Putting creative and practical intelligence at the same level will produce a third world environment.
Sorry Sternberg; but a bit salty at all the mealy-mouthed relativism of yours I've had to sift through for uni over the last year. Lying in the face of hard data to try and paint a whitewashed narrative of human cognition across all groups is pathetic. Genetic groups can easily be mapped by all tangible measures of intelligence/life performance, whoopsies.
Genetics would not contradict successful intelligence. It means that genetics will find that intelligence genetically speaking doesn't measure analytical intelligence alone. That sounds weird to begin with.
Analytical intelligence is more useful to maintain a western-style society. So IQ scores are still the golden standard. Putting creative and practical intelligence at the same level will produce a third world environment.
I'd say that analytical intelligence is evident in nonwestern context and societies, as evidenced by Sternberg's theory. Despite that western Societies engage in analytical intelligence, Sternberg's theory of successful intelligence shows that western Societies need practical and creative components to intelligence to give forth western Societies. Hearing his thinking, successful intelligence speaks of the multifaceted nature of intelligence, where analysis, creation and execution give forth the social structures and systems we see today. Basically, successful intelligence exists in all social contexts, western and nonwestern. If I give Sternberg theory of successful intelligence a fair shake, despite him coming off as problematic, if you integrate creative and practical intelligence into the analytical intelligence theory, one sees a new theory of intelligence emerge where IQ tests no longer accurately demonstrate intelligence. If IQ tests measure analytical intelligence alone, then IQ tests measure intelligence. If creative and practical intelligence are integrated into analytical intelligence, it doesn't mean analytical intelligence disappears. It means that analytical intelligence interdependents with creative and practical intelligences. Analytical intelligence changes altogether into a new theory of intelligence, where creative and practical intelligences will alter analytical intelligence to the point that analytical intelligence cannot be detected by IQ tests. Sternberg's own words of his childhood show this.
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 76 | คู่เอก "ผึ้งหลวง vs สมิงดำ"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/9SBshmGQOIM/mqdefault.jpg)
![[TH] VALORANT Champions Seoul - Grand Final - EDG vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/WvObMc9VelI/mqdefault.jpg)
Eight years later and this video is still wonderfully easy to understand and useful. Thank you Dr. Robert!
This is a good example of true teacher not only to the students but also socially
As a teacher myself and an MA in Education student, I found this to be extremely useful. Thank you very much Dr. Sternberg!
I'm reading about him in my course material for PSY317 Cognitive Functioning in the Elderly. I'm graduating in April and I'm very excited.
thank you for sharing, i found out at a young age i was dyslexic, many have seen this as a disadvantage, but i always looked at it as i just needed a different learning style.
i found i learn from a creative/practical way that helps me picture situations that i am learning about, having a daughter with dyslexia also i was able to help her think about her "disability " as an advantage as we see learning in a different way that can help us excel, i left school early feeling i couldnt learn their style and was feeling disadvantaged as they didnt know how to approach my type of learning, but since than i have found my own ways of learning which has finally brought me to begin for a bachelor's in my chosen field... in high school there was no way i could even think of going to uni, but im here!
its enlightening to see that my concepts of learning has a researched professional stand also. thank you again
That was so clear and easy to comprehend. Thank you Sir.
I found this video really useful and easy to understand. I am very interested in Multiple Intelligences theory but I had not heard about Successful Intelligence before and I find it very enriching. It is time that we start analysing intelligence in other terms.
This video was helpful not only to students but also for the teachers in dealing with his/her students. I cannot deny the fact that this video inspires me on how to teach the students effectively using differnt strategies.
Awesome information! Thank you for sharing it.
Thank you Adam Sandler :)
It's crystal clear to understand sir, tq very much sir for your time
Thanks for your great contribution for successful intelligence, especially for the contribution to education field.
thank you very much Robert! Useful information, charming way of sharing it and amazing research.
Matías González Ibáñez.
Psychologist and University Professor.
Thank you sir
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation:
00:59 🧠 Successful intelligence is the ability to succeed in life by figuring out your goals and adapting to your environment, different from IQ which primarily measures analytical skills and knowledge.
02:50 🎓 Varying teaching methods to accommodate students' diverse strengths, such as creativity, analytical skills, and practicality, can lead to higher academic achievement.
06:16 🌍 Recognizing and accommodating different cultural backgrounds and conceptions of intelligence can positively impact students' academic performance.
08:59 🎓 College admissions should consider not only traditional standardized test scores but also creative, practical, and wisdom-based abilities to predict student success more accurately and reduce ethnic group differences.
Made with HARPA AI
Thanks for that.
i think the best way to summarize this whole video is everyone is smart in their own situations
IQ, as one narrow definition of intelligence, in terms of achieving success of life, does not means too much. One needs more abilities to survive in a real life. Based on Sternberg's Triarchic Intelligence Theory, we all need to identify and develope all Big 3, - Analytical, Creative, and Practical Intelligence.
This information is amazing and inspiring, thanks a lot for your contribution, Mr. Robert
Thank you so much sir for such a wonderful and useful lecture.
There are three variables between raw intelligence and it's practical application, namely; the processing power itself (IQ, roughly), what you choose to spend it on, and what your circumstances allow you to apply it to.
I found this video useful especially in my subject. The information discussed was great and as a future educator it makes such sense to apply it in a classroom teaching and learning process.
information useful and memorable, very welcoming approach too.
Thank you for sharing
Thank you Robert!
Thank you.
sir, I experienced what all you said absolutely correct with my own children and students.
I want to point out one important factor that is some students have instinctive ability which cannot be explained with logic , still a matter of research.
God bless you sir
Me gustó mucho tu video
Hello: Just wanted to let you know the word Eskimo is not used anymore; it is Inuit or Northern Community Aboriginals.
Successful Intelligence.
This video was definitely stating the fact that teachers, parents and even students should learn to understand intelligence in a broad sense rather than to box it on the narrow concept of the IQ matter. IQ doesn't doesn't define who you are and what you can. Each of us have our own intelligence, know thy self!
Thankyou so much po sir
Wow, amazing
Would it be possible that teaching different ways to a group of students is in fact effective not because of the different learning styles but instead due to the fact that the information has been repeated under different approaches (VARK)....Dual coding theory?
thanks for the great speech there. successful intelligence is not iq we get it pretty clear by the words. its very useful and i think that there should be a check on this along with conventional tests. the real mind,mature and social skills will greatly affect the cognitive behavior of any human. the whole psycological perception of a individual is show. differing from conventional theories this actually relates a individual to the best of his kind. so by saying successful intelligence we take in basic things 1)common sense 2) creativity these are key for overall development of a individual. saying the distinctness this successful intelligence is a way of perceiving things in different manner and thinking what can be a different end. so coming to psychological part in denies the way of iq and takes it into more understanding and problem solving way of life. so successful intelligence is moreover the psychology of person to take things in mind and processes it.
So is this a revision of the ~Triadic theory of intelligence, e.g. a Quadrilateral theory... Wouldn't successfulness be a subjective notion in the first place, a manifestation of cultural and personal ideology?
Some aspects of success may be in competition, e.g. the acquisition of resources may come at a cost to personal health, relationships, or the production of offspring. If so, how would a balanced notion of success account for factors that were at odds?
Yep, the humanities/philosophical foundation is missing in most of his work
3.01: they thought I'm stupid.... I think they were stupid unable to recognize a legend😌
how does he do it
Is he my parent?
teachers: I'm just going to ignore that
🙏🏼.
Amazing how these folks who have these more forward thinking views of intelligence actually did poor on IQ tests. How did they acquire such achievement though?
Evidently, there are gifted people that were diagnosed as average or below average intelligence. Amazing.
The idiosyncratic models of intelligence explain how I went from a Russian orphanage to now being able to engage with folks who are clinically diagnosed as profoundly gifted and I can easily engage with them. Clearly, something is wrong.
♥
Does this belong to his Triarchic Theory or is this another Theory?
this guy reminds me so much of adam sandler.
Ummm Adam Sandler anyone? :)
So why add race into it?
its about differing cultures, which are related to differing races worldwide.
Sternberg's analysis on ethnic groups is so ambiguous, that I'm forced to question if he says without explicitly stating it that certain ethnicities are less intelligent because they do poor on IQ tests. His frustrating analysis feels subtlety racist. Eskimo children have analytical intelligence. That is racist to think they don't have it. I'm suspecting that when theorists gets a person to infer racial differences in race and IQ, as Sternberg did, then the theorist needs to be put under the microscope to determine their racial views.
He says that different cultures have patterns of different strengths. (Sounds essentialist) That is so ambiguous, he's asking for racists to use his successful intelligence theory to justify racism. He's trying to sound post racial, but his essentialist thinking disguised as acknowledging the differences of racial experiences is twisted. Brilliant but twisted. Distinct Racial experiences doesn't mean that racial groups possess differing levels of abstract intelligence. That is racist.
In fact, I believe his theory will be used to engage in racist policies and laws to place nonwhite groups into "distinctly different educational contexts that places them in their strengths, due to their makeup.". Of course it's racist, but it will likely happen. I feel for Sternberg. Because he will become another person used to justify racial systems.
Hello Global launch students Listening&Speaking class. ARE YOU READY TO TAKE NOTES!!!
No
evidence that equity cannot work :)
It took someone of these credentials to express axiomatic statements of this caliber?...
When you speak to someone, like, say, Jordan B. Peterson...let me know.
Analytical intelligence is more useful to maintain a western-style society. So IQ scores are still the golden standard.
Putting creative and practical intelligence at the same level will produce a third world environment.
that's a nice character you have there bud.
Sorry Sternberg; but a bit salty at all the mealy-mouthed relativism of yours I've had to sift through for uni over the last year. Lying in the face of hard data to try and paint a whitewashed narrative of human cognition across all groups is pathetic. Genetic groups can easily be mapped by all tangible measures of intelligence/life performance, whoopsies.
stupid comment
Genetics would not contradict successful intelligence. It means that genetics will find that intelligence genetically speaking doesn't measure analytical intelligence alone. That sounds weird to begin with.
I have other problems with the lack of rigor in Sternberg's work, but in the opposite way from what you're saying
Analytical intelligence is more useful to maintain a western-style society. So IQ scores are still the golden standard.
Putting creative and practical intelligence at the same level will produce a third world environment.
I'd say that analytical intelligence is evident in nonwestern context and societies, as evidenced by Sternberg's theory. Despite that western Societies engage in analytical intelligence, Sternberg's theory of successful intelligence shows that western Societies need practical and creative components to intelligence to give forth western Societies. Hearing his thinking, successful intelligence speaks of the multifaceted nature of intelligence, where analysis, creation and execution give forth the social structures and systems we see today.
Basically, successful intelligence exists in all social contexts, western and nonwestern.
If I give Sternberg theory of successful intelligence a fair shake, despite him coming off as problematic, if you integrate creative and practical intelligence into the analytical intelligence theory, one sees a new theory of intelligence emerge where IQ tests no longer accurately demonstrate intelligence. If IQ tests measure analytical intelligence alone, then IQ tests measure intelligence. If creative and practical intelligence are integrated into analytical intelligence, it doesn't mean analytical intelligence disappears. It means that analytical intelligence interdependents with creative and practical intelligences. Analytical intelligence changes altogether into a new theory of intelligence, where creative and practical intelligences will alter analytical intelligence to the point that analytical intelligence cannot be detected by IQ tests. Sternberg's own words of his childhood show this.