@@AromalARaj my argument wasn’t about wether something is true or untrue. My argument was about one step higher. How do we know a proposition is true with certainty. Engage with me on this for a second. Let’s see we found a fossil of mermaid. However we still have to make the deduction that the tail evolved into legs. I will give you another example let say there are twins. The only way to know with 100% certainty that they are twins is if you have seen them being birthed. If you believe that they are twins by someone else admission , it might be 100% true but it will still be a belief that they are twins. I am talking about epistemology. That talks about knowledge. Nature is “As Is”. It doesn’t make proportions. We do. Nature doesn’t talk about what “Ought” be the case or what “ought” be the reason. If you solved the “IS-OUGHT” problem then you would be the greatest philosopher that ever walked on the face on the earth. Evolution has decent PSR however existence of God also has a decent PSR via deductive reasoning of laws of logic or Kalam’s cosmological argument. At least I am being intellectually honest when I acknowledge this however it can’t be said the same for vimoh.
Sir I think when people say HAM DHARM KI RAKSHA KR RHE HAI , truly they meaning is that they defend their belief system by this statement and people only care about their belief system not any kind of dharm / karma . Log dharm ko tabtak follow krnege jabtak wo unko fayda pahuchata hai
This evolution debate always reminds me the funniest thing, one of my teacher in school used to say "Tumne kabhi koi adha insaan or aadha bandar dekha hai kya? to fir ye kaise keh sakte ho bandar insaan ban gaya? " 🤣🤣🤣
That’s not the position I took. I took a position of having reasonable position that via deductive reasoning we can say there may be an existence of God. When he says I am wrong in his title what he is basically saying is that he knows evolution is true. The only way we can know for sure is if we make a time machine and go back in time to witness it. Vimoh is being logical inconsistent when he says it’s not faith based after he agreed to the fact that we cannot know something with 100% certainty. Almost all knowledge is faith based. You read books and you have faith that the books are correct. What you are saying that God is faith based is a very justified position to have. however what vimoh is doing is having a double standard of PSR. Principle of sufficient reason. In one scenario he says I have sufficient PSR for evolution and in another scenario of existence of God he doesn’t have a sufficient PSR. However if he evaluates his own worldview with the same scepticism which he does for God he would end up with complete nihilism. He purposely doesn’t follow through his logical conclusion for his worldview and when I question him with the same level of scepticism he was forced to take a more “evolution being a certainty” approach. Which is being logical being inconsistent.
@@16leviathan "You read books and you have faith that the books are correct" - only if they come with a methodology & results can be replicated wrt some conditions. I believe to verify evolution we can compare dna & genes. Can u please provide any experiment/evidence related to God that comes up with a controlled methodology & consistent results.?
@@navdeep8697 engage with this. If you find a mermaid fossil. You still have to deduce that the tail turned into legs. Another example. Say we are talking about twins. You would never know with 100% certainty that they are twins unless you have seen them while their mother giving them birth. If you believe that they are twins by their admission then you are choosing to believe that they are twins. It is however a belief. Nature does not make propositions , we do. We can see nature as “IS” but what “OUGHT” be the reason or what “OUGHT” be the proposition is our own interpretation. If you say you have solved the “IS-OUGHT” problem then you would be greatest philosopher ever walked on the face of the earth. At a very fundamental level evolution is just a belief that the interpretation they are making is true. I think the PSR for evolution is decent. However I do think the PSR for God is also decent. Via deductive reasoning for laws of logic or Kalam’s cosmological argument. However we are in on the same boat. Which is both of us disagree with the PSR of the other’s position. However I am being intellectually honest when I acknowledge this. However same cannot be said for vimoh.
@@sagarhp2350okay, let’s say heisenberg uncertainty principle, at a very fundamental level mater is uncertain. If we hold that position then why ought we believe that matter would be certain as a whole. Say take time. We know by Einsteins time dilation principle than time can vary then why ought we believe that time ought be constant for calculating speed = distance by time. Let take gravity. If we know that gravitational pull is the net force we experience towards earth and understand that earth doesn’t rotate at constant speed then why ought we believe that the centripetal force doesn’t make gravity arbitrary. If your answer to these questions is it is what it is then that’s not a good enough PSR because that reasoning is a circular argument and a fallacy.
वैदिक ब्राह्मण don't want to accept चार्ल्स डार्विन theory, उनको सिर्फ मनुष्य की उत्पति ब्रम्हा के मुंह से कंधे से, पैरो से हुई है यही साबित करना है।😂😂😂 इसलिए सिलेबस ही चेंज किया।
All the things you mentioned are not written in vedas but manusmriti written by sumathi bhargav during sung dynasty(source as written by baba sahab ambedkar) not the original manusmriti written by maharshi manu which is known as manab tantra. Stop spreading lies.
What a job you have undertaken Bro,mind-blowing. You're teaching the most confused people in the world with a high level of overconfidence,it's well appreciation 🙏💐
Dear Vimoh, great work. I suggest the book Beak of the Finch on the great work of Peter and Rosemary grant who showed the evidence of evolution occuring in a period of four decades among Galopagas finches
Most of us are probably alive because of science and all of the advancements made in different fields such as medicine. It's so weird how people are still saying evolution didn't happen.
@@rangergaming8316 yeah literally, about half of the children didn't even live to 5 years, centuries ago because of no vaccine and.... And about 4 to 5 billion of us owe our life to amonia which was made a German scientist 100 years ago, Billion of people would have died because of lack of food. There are many problems in modern world, things that needs to be get done. But the world has never ever ever been such a good place to live and that's all because of science and only science.
There's a famous quote by Mark Twain I think where he says...when you're dead you don't suffer but people around you suffers;same thing happens when you're stupid 😂
Back in 2009, there was a survey done about what percentage of biologist accept Evolution by natural selection as a scientifically proven fact, and the percentage came out to be well over 98%. This caller needs to understand that Expert opinions matter, layman opinion doesn't. I would recommend everyone to read "Why Evolution is true" by Jerry Coyne. It's an amazing book on evolution.
someone said that Darwin once boarded an Indian merchant ship and he found a book on dashavatar that inspired him to research on evolution. Is it true?
I mean... so what? Did the book on Dashavatar detail the process of evolution? Getting inspired from something doesn't mean that inspiration has all the information. "Inspiration" itself means that it gave you a new idea which you then developed your own original idea on.
Based on Faith there are no medicines or vaccines... But we have Genetic based medicines and vaccines based on our understanding of genetic evolution 🧬
Hello bhai. Can you please make a video on Beerbicep bringing archeologists like Nilesh Oak with some proofs ? I am even not sure he is archelogist as per his linkedin account.
mastitis (animal disease)or anything ,antibiotics are the primary choice according to abs test then we will go to symptomatic treatment like fever antipyretics,DEXTROSS for energy.
@@dastran2731 most of the time side effect may happen when you take medicine more than the actual dose, medicines are ment to heal.every drugs has its own dose rate. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics play major role in this.
From the book "The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution" by Richard Dawkins (regarding the evolution of dogs): "The Russian geneticist Dimitri Belyaev was employed to run a fox fur farm in the 1950s. He was later sacked because his scientific genetics conflicted with the anti-scientific ideology of Lysenko, the charlatan biologist who managed to capture the ear of Stalin and so take over, and largely ruin, all of Soviet genetics and agriculture for some twenty years. Belyaev retained his love of foxes, and of true Lysenko-free genetics, and he was later able to resume his studies of both, as director of an Institute of Genetics in Siberia. Wild foxes are tricky to handle, and Belyaev set out deliberately to breed for tameness (i.e. not being afraid of people and being used to living alongside them). Like any other animal or plant breeder of his time, his method was to exploit natural variation (no genetic engineering in those days) and choose, for breeding, those males and females that came closest to the ideal he was seeking. In selecting for tameness, Belyaev could have chosen, for breeding, those dogs and bitches that most appealed to him, or looked at him with the cutest facial expressions. That might well have had the desired effect on the tameness of future generations. More systematically than that, however, he used a measure that was pretty close to the ‘flight distance’ I just mentioned in connection with wild wolves, but adapted for cubs. Belyaev and his colleagues (and successors, for the experimental program continued after his death) subjected fox cubs to standardized tests in which an experimenter would offer a cub food by hand, while trying to stroke or fondle it. The cubs were classified into three classes. Class III cubs were those that fled from or bit the person. Class II cubs would allow themselves to be handled, but showed no positive responsiveness to the experimenters. Class I cubs, the tamest of all, positively approached the handlers, wagging their tails and whining. When the cubs grew up, the experimenters systematically bred only from this tamest class. After a mere six generations of this selective breeding for tameness, the foxes had changed so much that the experimenters felt obliged to name a new category, the ‘domesticated elite’ class, which were ‘eager to establish human contact, whimpering to attract attention and sniffing and licking experimenters like dogs’. At the beginning of the experiment, none of the foxes were in the elite class. After ten generations of breeding for tameness, 18 per cent were ‘elite’; after twenty generations, 35 per cent; and after thirty to thirty-five generations, ‘domesticated elite’ individuals constituted between 70 and 80 per cent of the experimental population. Such results are perhaps not too surprising, except for the astonishing magnitude and speed of the effect. Thirty-five generations would pass unnoticed on the geological timescale. Even more interesting, however, were the unexpected side-effects of the selective breeding for tameness. These were truly fascinating and genuinely unforeseen. Darwin, the dog-lover, would have been entranced. The tame foxes not only behaved like domestic dogs, they looked like them. They lost their foxy pelage and became piebald black and white, like Welsh collies. Their foxy prick ears were replaced by doggy floppy ears. Their tails turned up at the end like a dog’s, rather than down like a fox’s brush. The females came on heat every six months like a bitch, instead of every year like a vixen. According to Belyaev, they even sounded like dogs. These dog-like features were side-effects. Belyaev and his team did not deliberately breed for them, only for tameness. Those other dog-like characteristics seemingly rode on the evolutionary coattails of the genes for tameness. To geneticists, this is not surprising. They recognize a widespread phenomenon called ‘pleiotropy’, whereby genes have more than one effect, seemingly unconnected. The stress is on the word ‘seemingly’. Embryonic development is a complicated business. As we learn more about the details, that ‘seemingly unconnected’ turns into ‘connected by a route that we now understand, but didn’t before’. Presumably genes for floppy ears and piebald coats are pleiotropically linked to genes for tameness, in foxes as well as in dogs. This illustrates a generally important point about evolution. When you notice a characteristic of an animal and ask what its Darwinian survival value is, you may be asking the wrong question. It could be that the characteristic you have picked out is not the one that matters. It may have ‘come along for the ride’, dragged along in evolution by some other characteristic to which it is pleiotropically linked. The evolution of the dog, then, if Coppinger is right, was not just a matter of artificial selection, but a complicated mixture of natural selection (which predominated in the early stages of domestication) and artificial selection (which came to the fore more recently). The transition would have been seamless, which again goes to emphasize the similarity - as Darwin recognized - between artificial and natural selection."
@@hindiisonlyalanguagenotkno913 at first I thought it was about artificial selection, but I was amazed how it explained that often evolutionary traits don't follow the rule of survival of the fittest ,but sometimes are a mere side effect.
I was listening to this live. And this guy was doing this BS of sneakily putting random BS comments and trying to quickly move on. Good to see Vimoh clearly calling him out on his BS. Love his innocence though -- 50 lac pieces of evidence (science) , 0 pieces of evidence (god) but dono faith based 😂😂😂
Why anyone has to live that long to understand evolution as a dominant theory for speciation? Iske hisaab se toh hum Mars pr bhi nhi gye h kyoki ise nhi bheja humne waha. Kaise log h yrr
People think evolution happens in one day. Every single adaptation contributes to evolution in the long run. No single creature is a different species from its parents or offspring. But if you look at all the family trees over millions of years, you will see a clear difference between the creatures at the root and the creatures at the leaves of that tree.
I hope you read this Vimoh. I have a hypothesis on: the origin of religion being part of our ill equipped evolution. According to this: 1. humans figured out ages ago that they are losing the evolutionary battle and many similar species are becoming so ill adapted that they are becoming extinct. ( humans being god’s creation was shunned by it according to Bible) 2. Humans with it’s back to the wall overcomes it’s own fear to fight off it’s challenges. Like use of fire and weapons etc. ( knowledge of the forbidden fruit) 3. It ingrains in them a fear of being in natural conditions and this we create civilisations. Because we could only survive in altered environments but not in nature anymore. ( abandonment of humans by god and live in a barren land with hardships) 4. Humans however physically and mentally starts to exhibit distortion because of living in unnatural conditions (evil). Like any other animal that acts in captivity or altered environment. We want to be with nature but also terrified of it. Knowing at certain level we can not really be one with what we are meant to be part of. This creating an utter confusion and need to ask for our purpose to exist( need for a saviour) 5. We become self aware and increasingly painfully aware that we are naturally incapable. Thus increasing population at all cost becomes a need (religious orders to procreate and increase in numbers) 6. However, the sins/ distroted behaviour becomes widespread and it soon spreads across the civilisation. The stress felt internally and emotionally is expressed through unnatural behaviours. So we label them, identify them. ( crimes, corruption and exploitation) 7. We also figured out the only way to counter these is to spread ways of harmony, forgiveness, love and compassion. Strengthen emotions that keeps us together. And scare people into self control. It worked until people completely forgot the purpose of the religion. 8. Humans despite of their many attempts, have gone into mass distortion of psyche many times. Because of it’s crisis and insecurity of identity as nature has always been our mother and enemy both. We have seen eradicationof civilizations, which was correlated with lack of religious practices by all religions. 9. So, it looks like origin of religion has been a way to give people a structure and practices to keep humans alive. Not because it’s the word of God because without the sense of a powerful protector humans tend to become more directionless and depressed. Knowing the truth of how we as species are quite unnatural, might become very disheartening? 10. Maybe the reason our growth has never been in harmony with nature. But, only when people could see through this prism they would consider nature as a power that we need to harmonise with above all else, to a certain degree to exist. Stop thinking of it as our parents who spoil us. Let me know what you think. Sorry for the doom and gloom theory.
Bhaiya Aaj sab ye debate kar rhe kyu ki aap adulthood ho gye Jo Hypothetical Situation & Critical Thinking ye sab karte hai . Mai Ek Language Students Hu Master In English Kar Rakhi Or B.Ed mera Es year complete hua ,jaha tak mai ek linguistic bhi hu PHD karungi Researcher banungi .Bhaiya Mai apni Soch apko bta rhi mtlb apne vichar anubhav jo meri bhasa ke roop se vyakt ho rhi hai or bhaiya ye bhasa hmari janam ke sath Shuru ho jati hai Jean Piaget ne kaha Bacha Apne gyaan ka nirmaan swayam karta hai or ye kehte hai bachhe language or thought dono interdependent dono ek sath chalti hai .Tab Bhaiya agar hum Jean Piaget ke cognitive development theory padhenge to bache ka Cognitive Process Schema - Assimilation - Accommodation - Equilibrium. Jean Piaget ne 4 stage di hai 1.Sensorymotor Stage .(Birth -2 ) Is stage me bache apne senses se sorrounding ko jaan pate hai. Es stage me bache ka bhasa nirman symbolic ,Babbling Roo ke apni bato ko kehna ese apne vichar vyakt karte hai. 2. Preopertational Stage (2-5 yrs )- Isme bacha apne intuitive hote hai symbolic hote chijo ko jane me ki jigyasa hoti hai. 3.Concreate Operational Stage 7 - 11 yrs Isme bche apne Aaas pass ki chijo ka ke logically think krte hai 4. Formal Operational Stage 11 & above yrs-- Is Stage me bachhe Logically ke sath Hypothesis karna sikh jate Amrut chijo ko jane or logically problem solving karna social situation ke problems v solve karna sikh jate hai. Conclusion yhi hai bhaiya ki hum janam ke sath kuchh believes or ideas anubhaw karte hai or bde hoke logically Hypothetical thinking develop karte hai. Bhaiya jab bache Human hi hai to pehle believes karna sikha apne anubhav batana kaise ek proper way me batana sikha tab jaa ke oo amrut chijo ke bare me jana sikha na . To bhaiya mai ye keh rahi Both Logical & Believes are different & Unique Or they have their own sense . Bache pehle believes karna sikhte fir logical to bhaiya agar believes hi karna shuru nhi kiye to hum logical & Hypothesis karna impossible hai . Jab human hi unique ek dusre se different unka khud ka apna sense . To dono me se ek ko sabit karna nonsense talk hui na. Aur bhasa ke jo sabd hote hai uske koi inherent nhi hote wo kha se niklne ye koi nhi janta but word ke meaning same hai . Situation ke basis pe word ke meaning set hote hai . Bhaiya mera yhi kehna dono ek hi sike do pehlu dono me ek hi hoga ye baat kattyi shi nhi . Wo hme balance karke chalna hota hai .Dono me kisi ek pe focus krenge to hum gir sakte hai . Adjustment nhi karna hume Assimilation Accommodation ye sab krke Balancing karna hota . Aur life hai balancing karna bahut jaruri chahe ho Universe ho ya Natural Things . Ek tarah se Universe hi Supernatural or Environment ko NAture kehte hai. Universe hai to hum hai ,hum nhi to Universe v nhi . God to ek word hai na bhaiya or word kisi other word me Allah ,Jesus , Kehte hai to ye word hi non inherent hai par meaning same hai to Language Unique hoti or apne sense hote hai. Ese v bhaiya scientifically v to hum apne environment ko khatra pahuchate hai use v to insaan marte hai. Kewal bole ki believes ke karan insaan patan me jaa rha to ye baat nonsense hai Upar sare mere anubhav jo maine kiya aap padhenge to aap or jitne v human beings ye samjh payenge. Thanku so much ❤🙏. Stay happy healthy & blessed Everyone 💐🙏.
Evolution supported by vast array of evidences , just like genetics , dna , molecular biology cell biology anatomy, Fossils , paleontology, anthropology, morphology and many more those who claims evolution is a fiction, they need some basic level of education
Educated but illogical अगर किसीने evolution होते हुए नहीं देखा हैं तब फिर किसीने कृष्ण को गीता बताते हुए भी नहीं देखा है, किसीने गणपति को भी नहीं देखा हैं, किसीने रामको भी नहीं देखा हैं, आजके कई सारे जीवित लोग भी अपना जन्मस्थान नहीं बता सकते हैं, और लोग राम के जन्मस्थान का दावा कर रहे हैं
Bhaiya Aaj sab ye debate kar rhe kyu ki aap adulthood ho gye Jo Hypothetical Situation & Critical Thinking ye sab karte hai . Mai Ek Language Students Hu Master In English Kar Rakhi Or B.Ed mera Es year complete hua ,jaha tak mai ek linguistic bhi hu PHD karungi Researcher banungi .Bhaiya Mai apni Soch apko bta rhi mtlb apne vichar anubhav jo meri bhasa ke roop se vyakt ho rhi hai or bhaiya ye bhasa hmari janam ke sath Shuru ho jati hai Jean Piaget ne kaha Bacha Apne gyaan ka nirmaan swayam karta hai or ye kehte hai bachhe language or thought dono interdependent dono ek sath chalti hai .Tab Bhaiya agar hum Jean Piaget ke cognitive development theory padhenge to bache ka Cognitive Process Schema - Assimilation - Accommodation - Equilibrium. Jean Piaget ne 4 stage di hai 1.Sensorymotor Stage .(Birth -2 ) Is stage me bache apne senses se sorrounding ko jaan pate hai. Es stage me bache ka bhasa nirman symbolic ,Babbling Roo ke apni bato ko kehna ese apne vichar vyakt karte hai. 2. Preopertational Stage (2-5 yrs )- Isme bacha apne intuitive hote hai symbolic hote chijo ko jane me ki jigyasa hoti hai. 3.Concreate Operational Stage 7 - 11 yrs Isme bche apne Aaas pass ki chijo ka ke logically think krte hai 4. Formal Operational Stage 11 & above yrs-- Is Stage me bachhe Logically ke sath Hypothesis karna sikh jate Amrut chijo ko jane or logically problem solving karna social situation ke problems v solve karna sikh jate hai. Conclusion yhi hai bhaiya ki hum janam ke sath kuchh believes or ideas anubhaw karte hai or bde hoke logically Hypothetical thinking develop karte hai. Bhaiya jab bache Human hi hai to pehle believes karna sikha apne anubhav batana kaise ek proper way me batana sikha tab jaa ke oo amrut chijo ke bare me jana sikha na . To bhaiya mai ye keh rahi Both Logical & Believes are different & Unique Or they have their own sense . Bache pehle believes karna sikhte fir logical to bhaiya agar believes hi karna shuru nhi kiye to hum logical & Hypothesis karna impossible hai . Jab human hi unique ek dusre se different unka khud ka apna sense . To dono me se ek ko sabit karna nonsense talk hui na. Aur bhasa ke jo sabd hote hai uske koi inherent nhi hote wo kha se niklne ye koi nhi janta but word ke meaning same hai . Situation ke basis pe word ke meaning set hote hai . Bhaiya mera yhi kehna dono ek hi sike do pehlu dono me ek hi hoga ye baat kattyi shi nhi . Wo hme balance karke chalna hota hai .Dono me kisi ek pe focus krenge to hum gir sakte hai . Adjustment nhi karna hume Assimilation Accommodation ye sab krke Balancing karna hota . Aur life hai balancing karna bahut jaruri chahe ho Universe ho ya Natural Things . Ek tarah se Universe hi Supernatural or Environment ko NAture kehte hai. Universe hai to hum hai ,hum nhi to Universe v nhi . God to ek word hai na bhaiya or word kisi other word me Allah ,Jesus , Kehte hai to ye word hi non inherent hai par meaning same hai to Language Unique hoti or apne sense hote hai. Ese v bhaiya scientifically v to hum apne environment ko khatra pahuchate hai use v to insaan marte hai. Kewal bole ki believes ke karan insaan patan me jaa rha to ye baat nonsense hai Upar sare mere anubhav jo maine kiya aap padhenge to aap or jitne v human beings ye samjh payenge.
They should create a nobel
Prize for patience
Fr
@@faisalwani4829 😊👍🏻
Maybe peace can be used
Frrr😂😂😂😂
Vimoh will win 1000 times.
By his logic dinosaurs also didnt existed because no one lived that long
Haha
fr
Yeah, he'd probably look at dinosaur fossils and say those are fake lol
@@AromalARaj my argument wasn’t about wether something is true or untrue. My argument was about one step higher. How do we know a proposition is true with certainty. Engage with me on this for a second. Let’s see we found a fossil of mermaid. However we still have to make the deduction that the tail evolved into legs. I will give you another example let say there are twins. The only way to know with 100% certainty that they are twins is if you have seen them being birthed. If you believe that they are twins by someone else admission , it might be 100% true but it will still be a belief that they are twins. I am talking about epistemology. That talks about knowledge. Nature is “As Is”. It doesn’t make proportions. We do. Nature doesn’t talk about what “Ought” be the case or what “ought” be the reason. If you solved the “IS-OUGHT” problem then you would be the greatest philosopher that ever walked on the face on the earth. Evolution has decent PSR however existence of God also has a decent PSR via deductive reasoning of laws of logic or Kalam’s cosmological argument. At least I am being intellectually honest when I acknowledge this however it can’t be said the same for vimoh.
@@rangergaming8316 for belivers fake is real and real is fake
I like how he inserted the word "faith" in a sneaky way but you caught it in time and broke his script. Bravo.
The caller was probably like "I have not seen my brain so I don't have one!"
😂😂 brutal
It tough to show directions to someone who is willfully blind😅
Woohoo!
So true
4:52 "you have faith in that data" 😂
😭😭😭😭😭Inn logon ke dimaag mein kya haii
what is so difficult in understanding that creatures evolved from their predecessors and it is a continuous process.
Religion lol
Because their religious beliefs overpower them
That guy is so messed up...
Sir I think when people say HAM DHARM KI RAKSHA KR RHE HAI , truly they meaning is that they defend their belief system by this statement and people only care about their belief system not any kind of dharm / karma . Log dharm ko tabtak follow krnege jabtak wo unko fayda pahuchata hai
That guy actually doesn't know the definition of faith.😅
😂 “ you have faith in the data “ got me
An advocate: Kaun hain ye log kahan se aate hain?
Me: uppercaste brahmanbaadi samaaj se aate hain jo log gobar khate hain aur gomutra bhi peete hain
they Also come from madarsa chap education....😅
@@vinodmeghwal9451 bro his comment in on caste toh samaj Jao yrr. Where his mentality is stuck don't comment on religion there's no use. 😂
This evolution debate always reminds me the funniest thing, one of my teacher in school used to say "Tumne kabhi koi adha insaan or aadha bandar dekha hai kya? to fir ye kaise keh sakte ho bandar insaan ban gaya? " 🤣🤣🤣
Bechara galat jagah aa gya. Got his ass handed over to him
even for an instance if we believe that evolution didnt happen, how can they prove that there is a creator, max they can say is :
" we dont know"
That’s not the position I took. I took a position of having reasonable position that via deductive reasoning we can say there may be an existence of God. When he says I am wrong in his title what he is basically saying is that he knows evolution is true. The only way we can know for sure is if we make a time machine and go back in time to witness it. Vimoh is being logical inconsistent when he says it’s not faith based after he agreed to the fact that we cannot know something with 100% certainty. Almost all knowledge is faith based. You read books and you have faith that the books are correct. What you are saying that God is faith based is a very justified position to have. however what vimoh is doing is having a double standard of PSR. Principle of sufficient reason. In one scenario he says I have sufficient PSR for evolution and in another scenario of existence of God he doesn’t have a sufficient PSR. However if he evaluates his own worldview with the same scepticism which he does for God he would end up with complete nihilism. He purposely doesn’t follow through his logical conclusion for his worldview and when I question him with the same level of scepticism he was forced to take a more “evolution being a certainty” approach. Which is being logical being inconsistent.
@@16leviathan "You read books and you have faith that the books are correct" - only if they come with a methodology & results can be replicated wrt some conditions. I believe to verify evolution we can compare dna & genes. Can u please provide any experiment/evidence related to God that comes up with a controlled methodology & consistent results.?
That's a very confusing lengthy answer and what do you mean by "Almost all knowledge is faith based" .., 🤔🤔 and may I know your educational background
@@navdeep8697 engage with this. If you find a mermaid fossil. You still have to deduce that the tail turned into legs. Another example. Say we are talking about twins. You would never know with 100% certainty that they are twins unless you have seen them while their mother giving them birth. If you believe that they are twins by their admission then you are choosing to believe that they are twins. It is however a belief. Nature does not make propositions , we do. We can see nature as “IS” but what “OUGHT” be the reason or what “OUGHT” be the proposition is our own interpretation. If you say you have solved the “IS-OUGHT” problem then you would be greatest philosopher ever walked on the face of the earth. At a very fundamental level evolution is just a belief that the interpretation they are making is true. I think the PSR for evolution is decent. However I do think the PSR for God is also decent. Via deductive reasoning for laws of logic or Kalam’s cosmological argument. However we are in on the same boat. Which is both of us disagree with the PSR of the other’s position. However I am being intellectually honest when I acknowledge this. However same cannot be said for vimoh.
@@sagarhp2350okay, let’s say heisenberg uncertainty principle, at a very fundamental level mater is uncertain. If we hold that position then why ought we believe that matter would be certain as a whole. Say take time. We know by Einsteins time dilation principle than time can vary then why ought we believe that time ought be constant for calculating speed = distance by time. Let take gravity. If we know that gravitational pull is the net force we experience towards earth and understand that earth doesn’t rotate at constant speed then why ought we believe that the centripetal force doesn’t make gravity arbitrary. If your answer to these questions is it is what it is then that’s not a good enough PSR because that reasoning is a circular argument and a fallacy.
1:40 Yaa it's not adaptation
Dude ne covid me koi newspaper nahi padha kaise covid variant evolvekiya. Bas English sikh k hero banne aa gaya.
वैदिक ब्राह्मण don't want to accept चार्ल्स डार्विन theory, उनको सिर्फ मनुष्य की उत्पति ब्रम्हा के मुंह से कंधे से, पैरो से हुई है यही साबित करना है।😂😂😂
इसलिए सिलेबस ही चेंज किया।
Yeah,i guess we got to much proud about our past and forgot to work better in present so our future gen could be proud of us
Then my next question is that... तो फिर ब्रह्मा की उत्पत्ति कैसे हुई😂
All the things you mentioned are not written in vedas but manusmriti written by sumathi bhargav during sung dynasty(source as written by baba sahab ambedkar) not the original manusmriti written by maharshi manu which is known as manab tantra. Stop spreading lies.
Ape > cave man > man with wings > man. Evolution our bro believes in.
@@bipinkujur1565 Man With Wings < Red Bull 🐂
@@Bhaiyaa_ji that is wings 🫠
@@bipinkujur1565Get your facts right, bro. It doesn't have wings; it gives wings to the drinker 😂
What a job you have undertaken Bro,mind-blowing.
You're teaching the most confused people in the world with a high level of overconfidence,it's well appreciation 🙏💐
बहुत मुश्किल है यार आस्तिक बनना
क्या क्या मानना पड़ता है
कभी evolution को adaptation कहना पड़ता है
तो कभी कुछ और
मेरे तो बस की नहीं है
At least he has confirmed that having faith without evidence is a bad thing.
“Who has lived so long😅”.
Superb 👌.
WhatsApp University Professor aptly handled.
Great.
This guy: Ho oo Ganja Ganja 😂
I think I have lived long enough to see devolution
Dear Vimoh, great work. I suggest the book Beak of the Finch on the great work of Peter and Rosemary grant who showed the evidence of evolution occuring in a period of four decades among Galopagas finches
Within the last 50 years, elephants in Mozambique have evolved not to have tusks
Monkey < Gorila < Cave Man < Jal Pari < Werewolf < Spider Man < Dr Strange < Baki Apne Hisab Se Jod Lo 😂😂
Vada Paw
I wish for Vimoh's patience!!!!
We will know if sun is real only when we go and touch the sun.
Way to go Vimoh - standing your ground!!
vimoh's expression is like, " i am in effing hell."
I feel good watching this content, yet I can’t help but feel sorry for the difficulties Vimoh encounters during its "creation".
Even if he had studied basic 11th and 12th standard biology he could have known about evolution
The problem with religious people is that they are not ready to change or update their belifs
I mean how can someone be sooooo much blind 😂 about facts
Most of us are probably alive because of science and all of the advancements made in different fields such as medicine. It's so weird how people are still saying evolution didn't happen.
@@rangergaming8316 yeah literally, about half of the children didn't even live to 5 years, centuries ago because of no vaccine and....
And about 4 to 5 billion of us owe our life to amonia which was made a German scientist 100 years ago,
Billion of people would have died because of lack of food.
There are many problems in modern world, things that needs to be get done.
But the world has never ever ever been such a good place to live and that's all because of science and only science.
There's a famous quote by Mark Twain I think where he says...when you're dead you don't suffer but people around you suffers;same thing happens when you're stupid 😂
Well mentioned!
Vomoh, you just proved that you have the patience of a hill.
Why did he bring faith in the argument of evolution 🤷🤦
Back in 2009, there was a survey done about what percentage of biologist accept Evolution by natural selection as a scientifically proven fact, and the percentage came out to be well over 98%. This caller needs to understand that Expert opinions matter, layman opinion doesn't. I would recommend everyone to read "Why Evolution is true" by Jerry Coyne. It's an amazing book on evolution.
The most difficult task is to mk those understand scientific perspective who are far away from science..
Got to give him points for trying 😂. “Hearsay”, “speculation “, “ faith”. He tried all the usual tricks.
Three words he needs to google : Peppered moth evolution
someone said that Darwin once boarded an Indian merchant ship and he found a book on dashavatar that inspired him to research on evolution. Is it true?
Bro wtf😭
😂😂😂
I mean... so what? Did the book on Dashavatar detail the process of evolution? Getting inspired from something doesn't mean that inspiration has all the information. "Inspiration" itself means that it gave you a new idea which you then developed your own original idea on.
I got inspired from the shape of a cloud
Bhakts are good at manipulating the facts with their lies as per their convenience.
Based on Faith there are no medicines or vaccines... But we have Genetic based medicines and vaccines based on our understanding of genetic evolution 🧬
All is well. All is well.
that's why you should not bunk biology classes in school😂
Vimoh bro, what patiences! Mai hota to gali dede ta.
Hello bhai. Can you please make a video on Beerbicep bringing archeologists like Nilesh Oak with some proofs ? I am even not sure he is archelogist as per his linkedin account.
He isn't
If this guy go the hospital then he will not ask medicine for his recovery he may ask faith 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@karthikchavan1520 tell me one disease and it's medicine
mastitis (animal disease)or anything ,antibiotics are the primary choice according to abs test then we will go to symptomatic treatment like fever antipyretics,DEXTROSS for energy.
And to overcome inflammation we use NSAIDS.
@@karthikchavan1520 how can you call something with side effect a medicine? biggest medicine is human body itself
@@dastran2731 most of the time side effect may happen when you take medicine more than the actual dose, medicines are ment to heal.every drugs has its own dose rate. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics play major role in this.
Itna sunke bad to mai slung use kar deta😂😂😂
I cant see Air, there is no Air, ez
Fossils could have been a good response for evidence
He used the word "adaptation". Ask him what adaptation means in the long term.
From the book "The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution" by Richard Dawkins (regarding the evolution of dogs):
"The Russian geneticist Dimitri Belyaev was employed to run a fox fur farm in the 1950s. He was later sacked because his scientific genetics conflicted with the anti-scientific ideology of Lysenko, the charlatan biologist who managed to capture the ear of Stalin and so take over, and largely ruin, all of Soviet genetics and agriculture for some twenty years. Belyaev retained his love of foxes, and of true Lysenko-free genetics, and he was later able to resume his studies of both, as director of an Institute of Genetics in Siberia.
Wild foxes are tricky to handle, and Belyaev set out deliberately to breed for tameness (i.e. not being afraid of people and being used to living alongside them). Like any other animal or plant breeder of his time, his method was to exploit natural variation (no genetic engineering in those days) and choose, for breeding, those males and females that came closest to the ideal he was seeking. In selecting for tameness, Belyaev could have chosen, for breeding, those dogs and bitches that most appealed to him, or looked at him with the cutest facial expressions. That might well have had the desired effect on the tameness of future generations. More systematically than that, however, he used a measure that was pretty close to the ‘flight distance’ I just mentioned in connection with wild wolves, but adapted for cubs. Belyaev and his colleagues (and successors, for the experimental program continued after his death) subjected fox cubs to standardized tests in which an experimenter would offer a cub food by hand, while trying to stroke or fondle it. The cubs were classified into three classes. Class III cubs were those that fled from or bit the person. Class II cubs would allow themselves to be handled, but showed no positive responsiveness to the experimenters. Class I cubs, the tamest of all, positively approached the handlers, wagging their tails and whining. When the cubs grew up, the experimenters systematically bred only from this tamest class.
After a mere six generations of this selective breeding for tameness, the foxes had changed so much that the experimenters felt obliged to name a new category, the ‘domesticated elite’ class, which were ‘eager to establish human contact, whimpering to attract attention and sniffing and licking experimenters like dogs’. At the beginning of the experiment, none of the foxes were in the elite class. After ten generations of breeding for tameness, 18 per cent were ‘elite’; after twenty generations, 35 per cent; and after thirty to thirty-five generations, ‘domesticated elite’ individuals constituted between 70 and 80 per cent of the experimental population.
Such results are perhaps not too surprising, except for the astonishing magnitude and speed of the effect. Thirty-five generations would pass unnoticed on the geological timescale. Even more interesting, however, were the unexpected side-effects of the selective breeding for tameness. These were truly fascinating and genuinely unforeseen. Darwin, the dog-lover, would have been entranced. The tame foxes not only behaved like domestic dogs, they looked like them. They lost their foxy pelage and became piebald black and white, like Welsh collies. Their foxy prick ears were replaced by doggy floppy ears. Their tails turned up at the end like a dog’s, rather than down like a fox’s brush. The females came on heat every six months like a bitch, instead of every year like a vixen. According to Belyaev, they even sounded like dogs.
These dog-like features were side-effects. Belyaev and his team did not deliberately breed for them, only for tameness. Those other dog-like characteristics seemingly rode on the evolutionary coattails of the genes for tameness. To geneticists, this is not surprising. They recognize a widespread phenomenon called ‘pleiotropy’, whereby genes have more than one effect, seemingly unconnected. The stress is on the word ‘seemingly’. Embryonic development is a complicated business. As we learn more about the details, that ‘seemingly unconnected’ turns into ‘connected by a route that we now understand, but didn’t before’. Presumably genes for floppy ears and piebald coats are pleiotropically linked to genes for tameness, in foxes as well as in dogs. This illustrates a generally important point about evolution. When you notice a characteristic of an animal and ask what its Darwinian survival value is, you may be asking the wrong question. It could be that the characteristic you have picked out is not the one that matters. It may have ‘come along for the ride’, dragged along in evolution by some other characteristic to which it is pleiotropically linked. The evolution of the dog, then, if Coppinger is right, was not just a matter of artificial selection, but a complicated mixture of natural selection (which predominated in the early stages of domestication) and artificial selection (which came to the fore more recently). The transition would have been seamless, which again goes to emphasize the similarity - as Darwin recognized - between artificial and natural selection."
@@hindiisonlyalanguagenotkno913 at first I thought it was about artificial selection, but I was amazed how it explained that often evolutionary traits don't follow the rule of survival of the fittest ,but sometimes are a mere side effect.
I was listening to this live. And this guy was doing this BS of sneakily putting random BS comments and trying to quickly move on. Good to see Vimoh clearly calling him out on his BS. Love his innocence though -- 50 lac pieces of evidence (science) , 0 pieces of evidence (god) but dono faith based 😂😂😂
Why anyone has to live that long to understand evolution as a dominant theory for speciation? Iske hisaab se toh hum Mars pr bhi nhi gye h kyoki ise nhi bheja humne waha. Kaise log h yrr
These are the guys who follow and accept everything Sadguru says
People think evolution happens in one day. Every single adaptation contributes to evolution in the long run. No single creature is a different species from its parents or offspring. But if you look at all the family trees over millions of years, you will see a clear difference between the creatures at the root and the creatures at the leaves of that tree.
How come if we don't believe in theology, we can't explain people generation with 4 legs and 2 sets of eyes as they provide better.
Was it really that much difficult to understand Vimoh's logical argument?
'That is adaptation' lmfo someone is tell this guy adaptation is part of evolution same with mutation, artificial selection, natural selection 😂
By his logic even indus valley civilation din exist😂 because no on from that era is alive
One of most convincing proof is eyes.... Eyes in different animals are at various stages of evolution
I hope you read this Vimoh. I have a hypothesis on: the origin of religion being part of our ill equipped evolution.
According to this:
1. humans figured out ages ago that they are losing the evolutionary battle and many similar species are becoming so ill adapted that they are becoming extinct. ( humans being god’s creation was shunned by it according to Bible)
2. Humans with it’s back to the wall overcomes it’s own fear to fight off it’s challenges. Like use of fire and weapons etc. ( knowledge of the forbidden fruit)
3. It ingrains in them a fear of being in natural conditions and this we create civilisations. Because we could only survive in altered environments but not in nature anymore. ( abandonment of humans by god and live in a barren land with hardships)
4. Humans however physically and mentally starts to exhibit distortion because of living in unnatural conditions (evil). Like any other animal that acts in captivity or altered environment. We want to be with nature but also terrified of it. Knowing at certain level we can not really be one with what we are meant to be part of. This creating an utter confusion and need to ask for our purpose to exist( need for a saviour)
5. We become self aware and increasingly painfully aware that we are naturally incapable. Thus increasing population at all cost becomes a need (religious orders to procreate and increase in numbers)
6. However, the sins/ distroted behaviour becomes widespread and it soon spreads across the civilisation. The stress felt internally and emotionally is expressed through unnatural behaviours. So we label them, identify them. ( crimes, corruption and exploitation)
7. We also figured out the only way to counter these is to spread ways of harmony, forgiveness, love and compassion. Strengthen emotions that keeps us together. And scare people into self control. It worked until people completely forgot the purpose of the religion.
8. Humans despite of their many attempts, have gone into mass distortion of psyche many times. Because of it’s crisis and insecurity of identity as nature has always been our mother and enemy both. We have seen eradicationof civilizations, which was correlated with lack of religious practices by all religions.
9. So, it looks like origin of religion has been a way to give people a structure and practices to keep humans alive. Not because it’s the word of God because without the sense of a powerful protector humans tend to become more directionless and depressed. Knowing the truth of how we as species are quite unnatural, might become very disheartening?
10. Maybe the reason our growth has never been in harmony with nature. But, only when people could see through this prism they would consider nature as a power that we need to harmonise with above all else, to a certain degree to exist. Stop thinking of it as our parents who spoil us.
Let me know what you think. Sorry for the doom and gloom theory.
Kahan se aate hai aise log
VIMOH 😊😊😊
Ye debater NIT ka hai, Biology nhi aati ise 😂😂
Bhaiya Aaj sab ye debate kar rhe kyu ki aap adulthood ho gye Jo Hypothetical Situation & Critical Thinking ye sab karte hai . Mai Ek Language Students Hu Master In English Kar Rakhi Or B.Ed mera Es year complete hua ,jaha tak mai ek linguistic bhi hu PHD karungi Researcher banungi .Bhaiya Mai apni Soch apko bta rhi mtlb apne vichar anubhav jo meri bhasa ke roop se vyakt ho rhi hai or bhaiya ye bhasa hmari janam ke sath Shuru ho jati hai Jean Piaget ne kaha Bacha Apne gyaan ka nirmaan swayam karta hai or ye kehte hai bachhe language or thought dono interdependent dono ek sath chalti hai .Tab Bhaiya agar hum Jean Piaget ke cognitive development theory padhenge to bache ka Cognitive Process Schema - Assimilation - Accommodation - Equilibrium. Jean Piaget ne 4 stage di hai 1.Sensorymotor Stage .(Birth -2 ) Is stage me bache apne senses se sorrounding ko jaan pate hai.
Es stage me bache ka bhasa nirman symbolic ,Babbling Roo ke apni bato ko kehna ese apne vichar vyakt karte hai.
2. Preopertational Stage (2-5 yrs )- Isme bacha apne intuitive hote hai symbolic hote chijo ko jane me ki jigyasa hoti hai.
3.Concreate Operational Stage 7 - 11 yrs Isme bche apne Aaas pass ki chijo ka ke logically think krte hai 4. Formal Operational Stage 11 & above yrs-- Is Stage me bachhe Logically ke sath Hypothesis karna sikh jate Amrut chijo ko jane or logically problem solving karna social situation ke problems v solve karna sikh jate hai.
Conclusion yhi hai bhaiya ki hum janam ke sath kuchh believes or ideas anubhaw karte hai or bde hoke logically Hypothetical thinking develop karte hai.
Bhaiya jab bache Human hi hai to pehle believes karna sikha apne anubhav batana kaise ek proper way me batana sikha tab jaa ke oo amrut chijo ke bare me jana sikha na .
To bhaiya mai ye keh rahi Both Logical & Believes are different & Unique Or they have their own sense .
Bache pehle believes karna sikhte fir logical to bhaiya agar believes hi karna shuru nhi kiye to hum logical & Hypothesis karna impossible hai .
Jab human hi unique ek dusre se different unka khud ka apna sense . To dono me se ek ko sabit karna nonsense talk hui na.
Aur bhasa ke jo sabd hote hai uske koi inherent nhi hote wo kha se niklne ye koi nhi janta but word ke meaning same hai . Situation ke basis pe word ke meaning set hote hai .
Bhaiya mera yhi kehna dono ek hi sike do pehlu dono me ek hi hoga ye baat kattyi shi nhi .
Wo hme balance karke chalna hota hai .Dono me kisi ek pe focus krenge to hum gir sakte hai .
Adjustment nhi karna hume Assimilation Accommodation ye sab krke Balancing karna hota .
Aur life hai balancing karna bahut jaruri chahe ho Universe ho ya Natural Things .
Ek tarah se Universe hi Supernatural or Environment ko NAture kehte hai.
Universe hai to hum hai ,hum nhi to Universe v nhi .
God to ek word hai na bhaiya or word kisi other word me Allah ,Jesus , Kehte hai to ye word hi non inherent hai par meaning same hai to Language Unique hoti or apne sense hote hai.
Ese v bhaiya scientifically v to hum apne environment ko khatra pahuchate hai use v to insaan marte hai.
Kewal bole ki believes ke karan insaan patan me jaa rha to ye baat nonsense hai
Upar sare mere anubhav jo maine kiya aap padhenge to aap or jitne v human beings ye samjh payenge.
Thanku so much ❤🙏.
Stay happy healthy & blessed Everyone 💐🙏.
❤❤❤❤❤
👌👌
Also..... There are a lot of evidences at molecular level
Corona mutation........
Evolution supported by vast array of evidences , just like genetics , dna , molecular biology cell biology anatomy, Fossils , paleontology, anthropology, morphology and many more those who claims evolution is a fiction, they need some basic level of education
They just ignore evolution totally due to their faith in religion. Otherwise nobody would say evolution is fake or not evidence based.
@@日本語大好き just read scientific miracles of quran and zakir naik it is just a theory not a fact
Aztec's has reverse evolution humans became other creatures
These are same people who believes that earth is flat
विमोह आप गाझा में लोगों कि मदद करने को क्यु कहते हैं भारत पाकिस्तान युद्ध में इजराइल ने हमारी मदद की थी
Bro, have some heart, we are trying to save people and children, the government only makes us fight.
Aapko ek baar 'vigyan darshan' se debate karna chahiye, wo bed me vigyan ho e ka dawa karta hai, uske video ko debunk kijiye, ❤🙂
Faith in the data??? sir needs to know how research works.
U look like an ai made thing 😭 (no disrespect Intended)
Dude expose Rajarshi nandy also make a video on him because no youtuber like you stopping his irrationality
Bhai ka mazaak mat bnao abhi seekh rha h duniya k baare me. It takes time to review and question your beliefs
Educated but illogical
अगर किसीने evolution होते हुए नहीं देखा हैं
तब फिर किसीने कृष्ण को गीता बताते हुए भी नहीं देखा है, किसीने गणपति को भी नहीं देखा हैं, किसीने रामको भी नहीं देखा हैं,
आजके कई सारे जीवित लोग भी अपना जन्मस्थान नहीं बता सकते हैं, और लोग राम के जन्मस्थान का दावा कर रहे हैं
Bhaiya Aaj sab ye debate kar rhe kyu ki aap adulthood ho gye Jo Hypothetical Situation & Critical Thinking ye sab karte hai . Mai Ek Language Students Hu Master In English Kar Rakhi Or B.Ed mera Es year complete hua ,jaha tak mai ek linguistic bhi hu PHD karungi Researcher banungi .Bhaiya Mai apni Soch apko bta rhi mtlb apne vichar anubhav jo meri bhasa ke roop se vyakt ho rhi hai or bhaiya ye bhasa hmari janam ke sath Shuru ho jati hai Jean Piaget ne kaha Bacha Apne gyaan ka nirmaan swayam karta hai or ye kehte hai bachhe language or thought dono interdependent dono ek sath chalti hai .Tab Bhaiya agar hum Jean Piaget ke cognitive development theory padhenge to bache ka Cognitive Process Schema - Assimilation - Accommodation - Equilibrium. Jean Piaget ne 4 stage di hai 1.Sensorymotor Stage .(Birth -2 ) Is stage me bache apne senses se sorrounding ko jaan pate hai.
Es stage me bache ka bhasa nirman symbolic ,Babbling Roo ke apni bato ko kehna ese apne vichar vyakt karte hai.
2. Preopertational Stage (2-5 yrs )- Isme bacha apne intuitive hote hai symbolic hote chijo ko jane me ki jigyasa hoti hai.
3.Concreate Operational Stage 7 - 11 yrs Isme bche apne Aaas pass ki chijo ka ke logically think krte hai 4. Formal Operational Stage 11 & above yrs-- Is Stage me bachhe Logically ke sath Hypothesis karna sikh jate Amrut chijo ko jane or logically problem solving karna social situation ke problems v solve karna sikh jate hai.
Conclusion yhi hai bhaiya ki hum janam ke sath kuchh believes or ideas anubhaw karte hai or bde hoke logically Hypothetical thinking develop karte hai.
Bhaiya jab bache Human hi hai to pehle believes karna sikha apne anubhav batana kaise ek proper way me batana sikha tab jaa ke oo amrut chijo ke bare me jana sikha na .
To bhaiya mai ye keh rahi Both Logical & Believes are different & Unique Or they have their own sense .
Bache pehle believes karna sikhte fir logical to bhaiya agar believes hi karna shuru nhi kiye to hum logical & Hypothesis karna impossible hai .
Jab human hi unique ek dusre se different unka khud ka apna sense . To dono me se ek ko sabit karna nonsense talk hui na.
Aur bhasa ke jo sabd hote hai uske koi inherent nhi hote wo kha se niklne ye koi nhi janta but word ke meaning same hai . Situation ke basis pe word ke meaning set hote hai .
Bhaiya mera yhi kehna dono ek hi sike do pehlu dono me ek hi hoga ye baat kattyi shi nhi .
Wo hme balance karke chalna hota hai .Dono me kisi ek pe focus krenge to hum gir sakte hai .
Adjustment nhi karna hume Assimilation Accommodation ye sab krke Balancing karna hota .
Aur life hai balancing karna bahut jaruri chahe ho Universe ho ya Natural Things .
Ek tarah se Universe hi Supernatural or Environment ko NAture kehte hai.
Universe hai to hum hai ,hum nhi to Universe v nhi .
God to ek word hai na bhaiya or word kisi other word me Allah ,Jesus , Kehte hai to ye word hi non inherent hai par meaning same hai to Language Unique hoti or apne sense hote hai.
Ese v bhaiya scientifically v to hum apne environment ko khatra pahuchate hai use v to insaan marte hai.
Kewal bole ki believes ke karan insaan patan me jaa rha to ye baat nonsense hai
Upar sare mere anubhav jo maine kiya aap padhenge to aap or jitne v human beings ye samjh payenge.