Is Hinduism in conflict with science?
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 เม.ย. 2024
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @vimohlive
Support the show at / vimoh
Make a one-time donation at vimoh.stck.me/profile
Please read these rules before commenting. Follow them to the best of your ability. The rules are meant to keep the comment space clean and a safe space for anyone who wishes to participate in good faith.
1. No advocating violence of any kind against anyone for any reason. People doing so will get banned from the channel.
2. No praising or abusing any religion for any reason. Proselytising is not appreciated, nor is making generalised statements about the followers of any religion. People doing so will get banned.
3. No casteism, racism, or sexism. Discriminatory language will get you banned too.
4. Trolling, spamming, use of fake accounts to deceive people about your identity, will also get you banned.
A hypothesis is not just a guess - it should be based on existing theories and knowledge. It also has to be testable, which means you can support or refute it through scientific research methods (such as experiments, observations and statistical analysis of data).
The caller had a very rough idea about creation. He doesn't know that the world was created by the 'Flying Spaghetti Monster'... or as he may call it 'a conscious being'.
Dawkins
Hail our Lord FSM! R'Amen!
@@nachiketadesai4188 Pastallelujah
@@tide7107 Pastallelujah!
Dont you think that all the universe and every living creature in it is an Evident in itself that there must be someone as God who created all of these complex things?
i was there on the stream , really liked your stream , btw i joked that ai is gonna replace the artists lmao
Sunday morning premiere
Being controversial on its own existence for thousands and thousands of years and still prevails, is itself the best possible method to deny God existence. If still under exploration, which Infact never ends so discussion may be carried out till next asteroid impact and again the issue will vanish out with us unresolved.
Sir with due Respect i want to participate in a debate with you on the matter and i believe it will be a great experience and indeed knowledgeable
Thank you 🙏
Very logical interesting debate
Excellent 👍👍
Caller: "i like to think i am opened minded" ... you know exactly where this is going ... and, yep, exactly
Sab kab apka next podcast hai and aap hindi me bath karte ho kya!
After watching this I forgot the meaning of hypothesis 😢😢😢 can someone explain please 😅
Khayali Pulav
Very tastey 😋
I liked your debate with that guy
Hypothesis is an assumption based on 'some' evidence.
Fine tuned universe.??
The headache of this video trying to decipher what the caller is trying to say
Keep going Vimoh. What's your blood pressure after such streams? Please I need data.
Watchiing is harder than the discussions. My blood pressure remains fine during streams.
I was high while watching this stream😂
Are you from odisha ??
“you Knoooww?!”
😂
❤❤❤❤❤❤
Bro went went with no data is hypothesis and take it as hypothesis but don't shame me with some other hypothesis on aesthetic basis. Bhai Many World has Measurable Notations to make it hypothesis and it isn't even science yet.
Rashad khalifa advanced 19 hypothesis.
Sabine has a book on this. He calls such claims ascientific as opposed to anti-scientific.
First best thing I watched on Sunday morning 😅❤
👍
Just say few words for God and religion are they same or different
Maybe be I can debate with you😅
Aaj Eid hai aur maine bhi khayali pulaw khaya😂😂
NO! existence of God cannot be a hypothesis because it is not falsifiable. Other than that the god that religions around the world taking about has been disproven many times like the phenomenon of lightening, raining , waves etc all were thought to be caused by a supreme deity is every religion and culture and is explained by science. So the question should be why science should we take religion seriously when it have been proved wrong multiple times.
Good line ...Bro...in min 6:29
God in side us..
God in mountain...
God in space ...
Sab check kiya sab jhut nikla..
...... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Aryan's definition of god is definitely logical contradictions. Omnipotent God leads to paradox of can God create a stone so heavy that he cannot lift it. Such contradictory definition of god cannot exist
sir hanuman chalisa me kaise earth to sun ki distance correct kaise likhi gyi ye to proof valid lagta hia na? what do you say?
'Science is dope' has a nice video on that topic, watch it.
@@hemachandrak3799 on vimoh channel?
It's not correct
nahi likhi gyi. Ye ek myth hai.
Andhere mein chhode gye 50 teer mein se Kabhi kabhi ek nishaane pe lg jata hai, lekin jb inspection kari jae to pata chlta hai k case to kuchh aur hi hai..
For more, visit the science is Dope channel like suggested here.
@@sumitkumar-gs2nc sir actually ye channel science is dope englsih me h aur mai jyda english me comfortable nhi hu. isley deep meaning samjh ni aata. aur han ek teer nhi ek aur fact ki 84 lakh yoniyo ka wo bhi almost correct h as per science almost there tak kaise pahuch gye the sant gyani log wo bhi bina kisi tech ke.
@13:51 .... there are many hypothesis we make in scientific world also *"on the basis of observation "*
So मेरे भाई तुम्हारे सृष्टि करता कि व्याख्या में क्या और कौनसे ऐसे *" observation "* जिसके आधार पे ये दांवा कर रहे हो कि *"मनुष्य जैसे किसी सजीव ने इस सृष्टि का निर्माण किया"* what are the *observation* on which you draw a conclusion that there was a living being which create this universe
*You are making only claim, without any observation
इसमें आप हिंदी वाले कैसे सुने साहब कैसे समझे हिंदी वाले
Learn English😂
Hello Vimoh, could you dispel the superstitions surrounding Mount Kailash? Numerous people assert that Lord Shiva resides there, and they believe the mountain is unclimbable and that one ages rapidly while there. Thanks 🙏
anything asserted without evidence can be rejected without justification
@@vimohlive "claims without evidence can be discarded without it"
-Christopher Hitchens
One day religion will give up.
Why are you eager to bring this down to such quantifiable level?
To understand it
Then we'll try and control it, to make it corruptible... as it already is.
@@akash3june It's even easier to corrupt things one doesn't understand
Only if the fear and greed is used for it...and to understand it, it's a never ending process, you keep learning and practicing, just like science.
Bro is tryin hard💀💀
Evolution and cosmology are two things every religion got wrong, including Hinduism.
No need to such sofisticated arguments.
Not exactly ancient greek and hindus actually talked about evolution.
Main problem here is that we tries to unify each of hindu philosophy under one umbrella religion.
Philosophy of spanda shavaism is different from advaita vedanta yet believer of both spiritual philosophies are classified as hindu.
We don't say platonism and stoicism are same religions.
@@johnconstantine8574 watch science is dope ......video on evolution
they didn't talked about evolution.....
I created god😂
😮 🙏
I am god
Aham brahmasmi
@@KADAMBA_SANATANI_02 👌
U R damm right
@@KADAMBA_SANATANI_02 sounds like a whole lot of mental gymnastics tbh. I don't mean to be rude. Just an observation.
I'll add a bit more detail to the conversation for better context.
a hypothesis is actually the 2nd step of the scientific method. there needs to be some observations before one can even make a hypothesis, what Vimoh was referring to as data. based on observations we make a falsifiable statement, the hypothesis. we should remember that for physical realities, we can never prove a negative. the statement is always positive and evidence either proves the statement or leaves it in the hypothesis state.
the many world interpretation is one way of explaining why quantum mechanics (QM) is the way it is. it is not the same as saying "there might be a god" which is based on subjective experiences. QM as a theory has been well established and the many world interpretation, along with other proposed theories, are proposing hypothesis based on the reality of QM. as long as we don't have any way of verifying the "other worlds" caused by wave function collapse, such theories will not be proved.
The person asking question has some confusions
ParamBrahma is NOT God. God means Devata. The god of The Abrahamic religions is a devata. In these religions, the followers are monotheists. So, they are not allowed to worship any other devata.
Many Hindus get confused by monotheism and mix up Param Brahma with the god worshipped by Abraham
I am not interested😂
The human body has five main sensory organs through which we perceive the world. These are:
Eyes, Ears, Nose, Tongue and Touch.
So, if things, such as God and Ghost eyc. are not perceived through any of these senses, how can we believe in the existence of those things? For thousand years, nobody found any evidence of God's existence. Therefore, believing in God's existence without any evidence totally blind faith!
can anyone name things that don't have a creator?? just a question out of curiosity.
If one assumes a creator, than that creator won't have a creator, unless you want to go back to an infinite number of creators creating subsequent creators.
Water, rocks, soil
frogs
Yes the god you claim to exist.
The universe 🤷♂️
Aap debate karte raho badalne bala to kuch he nahi upar se aap ka channel bhi to debate kar ke hi chalta he. aap ka aur kuch kaam to hoga nahi. god he ki nahi issi par bat kar te raheteho.
Rigidity all around.😂
Aise logo ko hi shashtro me andh bhagat kaha gaya hai 😅
Jai bhim jai Bharat sir