It is extraordinarily easy to manipulate Democrat Party voters to believe anything they're told to believe. 5 weeks ago, they were told Joe Biden is a sharp as a tack. And they all defended that. Very obedient people.
@@bassandtrebleclef That's not true and in fact a lie. Many could see his decline both physically and mentally and are glad he did the right and noble thing to do for the country. Now let's see if the old mentally declining man in the R Party will do the same. As far being manipulated, how many Items have you bought off this grifter, how many Bibles, pieces of his suit, how much money has he conned you out of? I love how dumb he is and yet he's still smarter than his Poorly Educated.
@@jalapeno6847we were told it was a comspiracy theory that he had any cognitive decline. Truth doesn’t really matter. The media are results oriented it’s about spinning things how it is needed for a specific result not about telling the objective truth
@@Yallquietendown The media does do that, fox is a great example of going beyond the spinning and lying uncontrollably for trump that they have been sued for nearly a billion and more to come. But yes Biden has declined but Trump is mentally losing it and is a danger not just to this country but also to the world if he ever got his hands and flaling mind with the nuclear codes.
@@blottolotto7648 Yea yea, you guys have nothing to say with facts, I understand as well as you and the felon that he's heading for another loss, he can see the writing on the wall and the cell door closing behind him.
I am deeply troubled by the number of people who think it's OK that Harris doesn't have a platform and that she should just ride the wave of aesthetic popularity through to November, including Nate. Do you not have any serious concerns that you want addressed before you give her this very important job? I know I do, and even as awful as Trump is, at least I can read where he stands. And yes, this was a subversion of democracy. It matters to left-leaning (now independent as of June) me.
Trump and MAGA is the only thing that will stop our current status quo establishment from driving our country over a cliff. You'll only truly understand this after Harris drives our country into ruin. By then it will be too late.
@universalsoldier2293 I too would like to see Harris get more specific, but the reason why the new non-Trump option has been surging in popularity over a short period of time is pretty simple. There are just too many people in this country that are way more concerned with Donald Trump (and his willingness to repeatedly and dangerously push alternate election results without any proof) than with Harris's lack of interviews in the first few weeks of her campaign.
@@jalapeno6847did she win a primary? No. She just absorbed Bidens. And you're the party that's constantly talking about protecting democracy yet you can even practice it in your own internal politics.
@@nedhill1242 If Harris is the only Democratic candidate running for President who else are they going to vote for other than Harris? No primary is needed, no debates are needed so tell me what could be done.
@@jalapeno6847unfortunately all the unaffordable care act did was double the cost of health insurance and increase co-pays to the point I can't afford to use the Healthcare that I'm paying for.
The more Kamal Harris speaks (so many lies -- never called out by MSM) the more she shows how shallow she is. Instead of LYING about what Trump believes and will do --- can you say what YOU (Kamala) will do? Agree that Trump has lowered his own chances, but Kamala will prove herself to be completely incompetent.
@@pmundkur First, what lies are you referring to, and second, trump is doing the very same thing with no policy to speak of. Please explain to us the lies your concernd with.
@@jalapeno6847the bit about price gouging for example. Not only is it false but it’s ballsy as hell considering her party is responsible for inflation. Anyway Kamala will never be called out for anything as we all know.
@@badmofaux Price gouging is absolutely true. First, if trump had taken the virus seriously at the beginning instead of trying to "play it down" for his poll numbers and playing golf while tens of thousands died, maybe the outcome would have been different. As you might remember, people were dying, getting sick, not going to work, to the stores. Companies raised prices to compensate and continued, even now you can see their greed in smaller packages of food with either the same or higher price. But why is that a surprise, they have been doing that for years, life saving medications, medical equipment, hospital stays. And what does the Republicon Party of family values do to combat the greed, they give them more tax breaks. Don't blame Democrats, blame RepubliCONS and yourself for voting for these cons.
@@jalapeno6847 Will she continue to fund the Israel war in Gaza? Will she continue to support fracking? Will she support Medicare for all? Will she continue to support Biden's inhumane crackdown on the border with Mexico? Will she reallocate police funding to preventive measures? Will she support law and order or justice reform? What is her position on the endless increase in federal debt? Harris has been all over the place changing her position with the wind. What are her policy positions???
Answer: Not nearly likely as much as it was before she appointed Walz. She is losing in every Pennsylvania poll and she can't win without Pennsylvania. Shapiro would have put her over the top. Now she is an underdog again.
The polls I'm seeing she's up by 1 in Penn but who knows where that will be in 3 months it took months for the extreme media support and censorship around 2016 to get spoken of by regular voters but also any of the negatives of 2020 were completely covered up by the media and tech censorship who knows how 2024 will go the media has already memory holed that Biden was old and the media lied about his capabilities now a lot of the attacks from the media are Trump's age which at least now doesn't seem to have changed his capabilities from 2016
@@krzytofr34 Possibly. But then Cooper or Kelly still would have been a better choice. At least they increase the chance of delivering a battleground state. Walz gains her nothing and might actually chase off some right of center undecided voters.
Agreed. Plus, he was educated at Yale Law School after enlisting in the Marine Corps and attending Ohio State, which he graduated in less than 3 years. His bestseller didn't "trash" the community he came from; he laid out the troubled history plaguing many generations of families and communities and why so many self-destructive trends have continued. Walter Kirn, a MN native, delves into the stark disparity between those from the upper Midwest and those from Southern OH and Appalachia on a recent "Racket" episode w/Matt Taibbi.
Reproductive FREEDOM is on the line! The government, a state or even the entire country shouldn't tell a woman what to do with her own body!! VOTE FREEDOM💙💙💙 VOTE FREEDOM 💙💙💙 Move forward..
@@angelj3748 relax! No one is taking your freedom away,in fact you have more freedom than ever before,you can change your gender from boy to girl and girl to boy,and your government freebies 🙄
@@luz-7411 Have you been living under a rock? In some states some woman can't get an abortion or use birth control. Do you know what Reproductive Rights are?? They reversed Roe vs Wade, and many woman were affected by it. Now they left it up to the states for now...
Accept accountability for your actions. You are not dealing with a woman's body, you're also dealing with someone else's body inside of her. That is the truth!
Calling parents' right to supervise their own children 's reading material "book banning" is deeply dishonest. Another reason some of us have gone from disagreeing with the left to full contempt.
@@sanniepstein4835 oh, please. You've turned into a bunch of paranoid witch burners. I don't know what deep seated issues have led to you living in fear, I am just glad I am not you
>It's taken on a life of it's own No. It's been astroturfed by paid media opperatives like Harry Sisson and "JoJo for Jerz" >We're so popular we have to pay people to support us online LMAO
The question is whether Harris can respond extemporaneously to detailed policy questions. She has the rah-rah rally performance down pretty good. We do not know much about how she intends to govern over the next four years. What Biden policies will she keep and which one will she change?
Trump doesn't respond to detailed policy questions, so why should she? She's following the Trump playbook, and it's the best thing ever. Her advisors are doing a great job.
Why should she respond to "detailed policy questions"? Trump never does and in fact isn't interested in policies, only in himself, and I'm sure he hasn't even read the Project 2025 that his cronies have written.
I hate the argument about the primary, what person in their right mind would give up their seat to try and win a presidential election with less than 100 days of campaigning
Trump "press conference" about nothing at all, just an interminable flood of blatant lies and no-one called him out. Why does the bar have to be so low for Trump and so high for everyone else?
@@charlie7827 I look at policies not personality and Trump has better policies. Kamala has not even put her policies on her website like every other candidate past or present. She did nothing about the border. [Source: U.S. Customs and Border Protection website] 2019 Southern Border Encounters 851,508 (Remain in Mexico Policy initiated by Trump) 2020 Southern Border Encounters 400,651 2021 Southern Border Encounters 1.73 million (Remain in Mexico Policy terminated by Biden) 2022 Southern Border Encounters 2.37 million 2023 Southern Border Encounters 2.47 million
They actually have a candidate that they KNOW they cannot let speak. The only ... THE ONLY chance Kamala has if they do not let her speak. Inspiring ! btw WOW that couch joke was ... hilarious! (eye roll)
There's definitely been changes since 2020. Gas is up, my paychecks are down, food is more expensive, and housing cost is crazier than the cost of gas. I *WISH* nothing has changed since 2020.
“She was the vice President but she wasn’t the president” is so strange to me, I associate the VP with everything their boss did, they basically exist to defend the other guys policies and Harris defended all of Biden’s just like normal.
I categorically disagree with Zach here. It is not the "Daily Reason Roundup". It is the Mourning Lynx, and Liz Wolfe is a national treasure for her work.
37:28 This is why I think the game democracy 4 is unbalanced. Basically if you make the economy boom in that game your nearly guranteed to be voted out of office. As far as I can tell its becuase there are a shitton of negative consequences to higher gdp the way the model is designed. So you get punished if gdp and productivity go up.
I think the best thing Harris' campaign can do for her is keep her tucked in and have her talk for as little as at all possible. Every time she opens her mouth in public, she loses voters.
@@ambidexter2017 How do you know she loses votes, do they call you, do you take a poll, or did you just make that up. Maybe if she talked about Hannibal Lecter or getting eaten by sharks or praised Putin would be ok, right?
Literally the opposite of true. The more she and Walz speak, the more people remember how nice it is to have articulate politicians that talk about issues they actually care about.
@@robertspringer896No, the more they grow reacquainted with a time when they could shut their minds off and pay no attention whatsoever. Ah, comforting.
People don't want to see people on TV like they did with Trump.! People want normalcy . People want difference even some policies aren't up to what we want .
People like you guys think there's only one right answer and that is your answer. Why wasn't people as upset a year after covid ended and vote on that issue like I did? Because when people get out of prison, they celebrate.
It sounds like Nate Silver doesn't have a grasp on what Trump is when he says "Trump is pretty far to the right". Either that or Silver doesn't understand conservatives at all, which I suppose could be equally likely. If Silver doesn't understand one or both, then what value could he have in this interview?
"Right" and "Left" are vague ideas to begin with but Conservatism is a vast range of ideas, and doesn't really mean much of anything on its own. Trump is a right wing populist, and it's not wrong to call him "far right".
@@shaun7142 I'd like to make a point, but to do this I need to define "far to the right" in a political sense which should be obvious and logical. I know this is a leap since so much of the media disparages people who lean right in their politics, so much that somehow "far right" is equated to being a racist bigot. Even if this is the most common use of "far right", this really is nonsense. The most logical understanding of "far to the right" should be a political ideology that synergizes with longstanding, centuries long traditions common to American peoples through history. In more practical terms this means if a Protestant god says a thing is good, than that thing is good. It also means that people far to the right never want anything to change ever. I see though that the next step would be to state the positions of such an ideology and then show that Trump is so far removed from these positions that there is no way you could possibly associate him with this. This might actually take more effort than I would like to give. In any case, I'll just state that while Trump is himself not strongly ideological, the best way to describe him if you had to pin him down would be a Progressive Republican. In other words if you removed all of the political strategy that he wields as a politician and left him only with ideology, that is what would be left. Granted though that he is about 95% politician and about 5% ideologue, so this is removing almost everything that he is. Positionally Trump is very much on the left side of the Republican party. Populists like him, but that doesn't mean anything in this context. Populism isn't exclusive to either side of the political spectrum. It doesn't describe whether a person is more or less traditional in their policy preferences which really is what this is about. There is a point though that I will concede, though I'll concede it on my terms. It is easier to define purists, and being "far to the right" should logically be a purist position. Conservatism can contain a vast range of ideas as you say, however I quibble with this idea when it refers to a "far to the right" political ideology.
> It also means that people far to the right never want anything to change ever. No, that's extreme conservatism. Think about it this way, how would you categorize a right-wing anarchist? Most people would consider them "far right", as well as fascists (real ones), right-wing dictators, etc. > Populism isn't exclusive to either side of the political spectrum. Neither is conservativism. > There is a point though that I will concede, though I'll concede it on my terms. It is easier to define purists, and being "far to the right" should logically be a purist position. But there is no standard for the right-wing, even with your definition that doesn't actually encompass what the right-wing is.
@@shaun7142 The original right wing party when this whole right/left idea was created were the French Royalists who wanted to reverse the reforms of the French Revolution and restore the House of Bourbon and the Catholic Church. So yes, the right is conservative in the sense that conservatism means "to preserve", or at least "to restore tradition". Extreme conservatism is logically what the far right represents. : the restoration of tradition, the restoration of traditional forms of order, ect. If *"Most people would consider them "far right", as well as fascists (real ones), right-wing dictators, etc."*, then most people are wrong.
@@shaun7142 shaun7142: *"how would you categorize a right-wing anarchist?"* I think the question already did categorize them as right-wing, so I am not sure what more you would be looking for. Is right-wing meant as a pejorative in this question? Is it implied that this is the ideology of conspiracy nuts? Is it meant to suggest something that doesn't have much to do with where someone lies on a political spectrum? Anarchists generally come in two flavors. One flavor is of those who desire to overthrow the current order and replace it with another. Another flavor is those who want absolutely no government whatsoever. The second one, though naturally unrealistic as power vacuums never remain as power vacuums, has commonalities with American conservatism. This is only because American conservatism has its roots in limited government and federalism while American liberalism has for a long time been a Wilsonian behemoth. There still remain stark differences between conservatives and anarchists.
Let's try to see both sides of things. Democracy means crossing the aisle and working with views we are unfamiliar with, and coming together for a compromise.
Lol I am not going to work with people who support child genital mutilation and are allowing millions of illegals to pour into the country. There's no middle ground with that.
He says he won the 2020 election. He didn't. He says his innauguration crowd was the biggest ever. It wasn't. Those are just two off the top of my head.
I think more people care about using our tax dollars to support foreign wars is a HUGE issue with ALL Americans which unifies libertarians with independents and dems on the Gaza/Ukraine issue.
Can't wait to hear This brilliant mental gymnastics for why we have to dispel with democracy because democracy is on the line😂 we can't leave this one up to the voters folks not if we want to save our democracy AKA Democrats being in power because they don't give a s*** about democracy when they lose
@josephhester753 Democraps won in 2020 because of ballot harvesting, which is legal in several states. They did what they had to to win. How tf did Republicans not know this??? Instead, you had Trump throwing a tantrum, and that old lady talking about: "uNlEaSh tHe KrAkEn"..... Dems play CHESS, while Republicans play stupid. 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
I’m calling him Nasty Nate because he’s a liar and a propagandist not because of his appearance. Nasty Nate knows the nonsense he’s spewing isn’t supported by the data. He’s helping the establishment create a narrative to mislead the people period full stop
But what if the R’s made up a sorry about Kamala having sex with a goat or a coconut? Would that be fair game and hilarious for Vance to make references to?
And the look on his face when someone called out in front of the public in a news show. He got both the primary and final election results dead wrong. But that qualifies as an "expert" I guess. If got everything correct, he will be called a "conspiracy theorist" 🤣
Would like to get Nate’s take on the Rasmussen Polls which have Trump ahead in the swing states and winning by 4-5 points. Nate was had HC ahead by 10 points right before 2016 election.
Rasmussen has always favorable to Trump in past election cycles. Even trafalgar has harris +2 in Michigan and only has trump +1 in Wisconsin And + 2 in Pennsylvania. If thats trumps margin then he's in trouble for sure
@@charlie7827 Trafalger has Harris up by 1% in MI. But the point is that the MSM is telling us Harris is up in “all the polls” and “Trump doesn’t know what to do”! Utter BS and it’s pure and intentional misinformation. It’s a lie.
It is extraordinarily easy to manipulate Democrat Party voters to believe anything they're told to believe. 5 weeks ago, they were told Joe Biden is a sharp as a tack. And they all defended that. Very obedient people.
@@bassandtrebleclef
That's not true and in fact a lie. Many could see his decline both physically and mentally and are glad he did the right and noble thing to do for the country. Now let's see if the old mentally declining man in the R Party will do the same.
As far being manipulated, how many Items have you bought off this grifter, how many Bibles, pieces of his suit, how much money has he conned you out of?
I love how dumb he is and yet he's still smarter than his Poorly Educated.
@@jalapeno6847we were told it was a comspiracy theory that he had any cognitive decline. Truth doesn’t really matter. The media are results oriented it’s about spinning things how it is needed for a specific result not about telling the objective truth
@@Yallquietendown
The media does do that, fox is a great example of going beyond the spinning and lying uncontrollably for trump that they have been sued for nearly a billion and more to come. But yes Biden has declined but Trump is mentally losing it and is a danger not just to this country but also to the world if he ever got his hands and flaling mind with the nuclear codes.
@@jalapeno6847 ur answer just reinforces what the OP wrote
@@blottolotto7648
Yea yea, you guys have nothing to say with facts, I understand as well as you and the felon that he's heading for another loss, he can see the writing on the wall and the cell door closing behind him.
I am deeply troubled by the number of people who think it's OK that Harris doesn't have a platform and that she should just ride the wave of aesthetic popularity through to November, including Nate. Do you not have any serious concerns that you want addressed before you give her this very important job? I know I do, and even as awful as Trump is, at least I can read where he stands. And yes, this was a subversion of democracy. It matters to left-leaning (now independent as of June) me.
You give me hope for the country, and I feel your pain. I fear people like us are VASTLY outnumbered.
She's not Trump and she doesn't have one foot in the grave. Ding ding ding. We have a winner.
Trump and MAGA is the only thing that will stop our current status quo establishment from driving our country over a cliff.
You'll only truly understand this after Harris drives our country into ruin. By then it will be too late.
Are starting to see the relevance of the NPC meme?
@universalsoldier2293 I too would like to see Harris get more specific, but the reason why the new non-Trump option has been surging in popularity over a short period of time is pretty simple. There are just too many people in this country that are way more concerned with Donald Trump (and his willingness to repeatedly and dangerously push alternate election results without any proof) than with Harris's lack of interviews in the first few weeks of her campaign.
If you vote for a vibe… don’t be surprised that people don’t respect you
All Trump has ever had is vibes. Except now the vibe is just weird tired old creep who is off his rocker
Bro, did you see white dudes for Harris? When did you think they care about respect lmao
@@robertspringer896 Ok TDS sufferer
T.D.S
excellent point. their arguments are based on "nice" feelings and vibes not failed harris initiatives
"We believe in democracy.." said by someone nobody voted for...
@@nelsonbrum8496
Voted for?
Harris has secured 99% of Delegates to become the Party's Presidential nominee after a five day VOTE.
Trump doesn't even believe in democracy .....
@@jalapeno6847 lol not by registered voters. The Dems haven't had a primary since 2008. Glenn Greenwald explains it in detail as do others.
@@jalapeno6847did she win a primary?
No. She just absorbed Bidens.
And you're the party that's constantly talking about protecting democracy yet you can even practice it in your own internal politics.
@@nedhill1242
If Harris is the only Democratic candidate running for President who else are they going to vote
for other than Harris?
No primary is needed, no debates are needed so tell me what could be done.
Question is will Kamala be forced to answer a question before the election?
🤔
You want a word salad?
They will make her , but it will NEVER be good enough !
What about Trump? He takes questions but never answers them but just starts rambling about a totally different subject. Or he insults the journalist.
“He takes questions…”
This is kind of depressing.
Well then, I hope you have Health Ins from the Affordable Care Act and get help.
@@jalapeno6847unfortunately all the unaffordable care act did was double the cost of health insurance and increase co-pays to the point I can't afford to use the Healthcare that I'm paying for.
Nate Silver said COVID isn't a topic anymore. Will Remy do "We Don't Talk about COVID [Bruno]" parody next?
The same thing happened after the Spanish Flu, it just disappeared from newspapers, hospitals, and even personal letters.
The more Kamal Harris speaks (so many lies -- never called out by MSM) the more she shows how shallow she is.
Instead of LYING about what Trump believes and will do --- can you say what YOU (Kamala) will do?
Agree that Trump has lowered his own chances, but Kamala will prove herself to be completely incompetent.
White women will vote her in.
THEN she will show her incompetence.
@@pmundkur
First, what lies are you referring to, and second, trump is doing the very same thing with no policy to speak of. Please explain to us the lies your concernd with.
@@jalapeno6847the bit about price gouging for example. Not only is it false but it’s ballsy as hell considering her party is responsible for inflation.
Anyway Kamala will never be called out for anything as we all know.
@@badmofaux
Price gouging is absolutely true. First, if trump had taken the virus seriously at the beginning instead of trying to "play it down" for his poll numbers and playing golf while tens of thousands died, maybe the outcome would have been different. As you might remember, people were dying, getting sick, not going to work, to the stores. Companies raised prices to compensate and continued, even now you can see their greed in smaller packages of food with either the same or higher price. But why is that a surprise, they have been doing that for years, life saving medications, medical equipment, hospital stays. And what does the Republicon Party of family values do to combat the greed, they give them more tax breaks.
Don't blame Democrats, blame RepubliCONS and yourself for voting for these cons.
@@jalapeno6847 Will she continue to fund the Israel war in Gaza? Will she continue to support fracking? Will she support Medicare for all? Will she continue to support Biden's inhumane crackdown on the border with Mexico? Will she reallocate police funding to preventive measures? Will she support law and order or justice reform? What is her position on the endless increase in federal debt? Harris has been all over the place changing her position with the wind. What are her policy positions???
The couch joke from the side that implements censorship to fight ‘misinformation’ is disgusting.
Simmer down Francis.
And the lies by omission.
Agreed. That, his birth certificate, her server, etc. All political theater.
Biden is sharp as a tack. Totally not misinformation.
He's trying to appeal to the republicans as they like their sex jokes, dad creeping on his own daughter, sexual predators and rapists.
Answer: Not nearly likely as much as it was before she appointed Walz.
She is losing in every Pennsylvania poll and she can't win without Pennsylvania. Shapiro would have put her over the top. Now she is an underdog again.
The polls I'm seeing she's up by 1 in Penn but who knows where that will be in 3 months it took months for the extreme media support and censorship around 2016 to get spoken of by regular voters but also any of the negatives of 2020 were completely covered up by the media and tech censorship who knows how 2024 will go the media has already memory holed that Biden was old and the media lied about his capabilities now a lot of the attacks from the media are Trump's age which at least now doesn't seem to have changed his capabilities from 2016
This. I couldn’t believe her pick. I have a feeling Josh wanted out, but the media didn’t disclose it.
@@krzytofr34 Possibly. But then Cooper or Kelly still would have been a better choice. At least they increase the chance of delivering a battleground state. Walz gains her nothing and might actually chase off some right of center undecided voters.
Untrue. Just check 538. She's lead in some polls, whilst Trump leads in others.
Well, the problem with Shapiro is that she would lose the 'gays for Palestine' crowd. And she can't win without them either.
Kamala a "good candidate"?
Good for what? For whom?
@@bassandtrebleclef I think the correct question is "compared to whom?"
Definitely. She's kicking ass.
@@chrisoconywrong.
@@LordRykard9376Your comments stink of panic and desperation. Trump is going to lose and you’re starting to realize it.
Great interview. You need to get Nate Silver on more often.
Not particularly a fan of Tim Walz equating Appalachia with “Middle America”, two very different things with very different cultures
Agreed. Plus, he was educated at Yale Law School after enlisting in the Marine Corps and attending Ohio State, which he graduated in less than 3 years. His bestseller didn't "trash" the community he came from; he laid out the troubled history plaguing many generations of families and communities and why so many self-destructive trends have continued. Walter Kirn, a MN native, delves into the stark disparity between those from the upper Midwest and those from Southern OH and Appalachia on a recent "Racket" episode w/Matt Taibbi.
Reproductive FREEDOM is on the line!
The government, a state or even the entire country shouldn't tell a woman what to do with her own body!!
VOTE FREEDOM💙💙💙
VOTE FREEDOM 💙💙💙
Move forward..
@@angelj3748 relax! No one is taking your freedom away,in fact you have more freedom than ever before,you can change your gender from boy to girl and girl to boy,and your government freebies 🙄
@@angelj3748 And Camala/ Biden forced us into getting the jab 💉talk about my body my choice 🙄
@@luz-7411 Have you been living under a rock? In some states some woman can't get an abortion or use birth control. Do you know what Reproductive Rights are?? They reversed Roe vs Wade, and many woman were affected by it. Now they left it up to the states for now...
Accept accountability for your actions. You are not dealing with a woman's body, you're also dealing with someone else's body inside of her. That is the truth!
I left the democrats just last year. I'm in Minneapolis. I will vote a red ticket for the first time in my life.
Why did u leave?
The "weird" label fits because, as Walz said, what kind of people ask for book bans or fewer rights for women? That is flat out weird and creepy...
Calling parents' right to supervise their own children 's reading material "book banning" is deeply dishonest.
Another reason some of us have gone from disagreeing with the left to full contempt.
@@sanniepstein4835 oh, please. You've turned into a bunch of paranoid witch burners. I don't know what deep seated issues have led to you living in fear, I am just glad I am not you
14:35 that's the "I want to use you for cheap inmate labor" look
>It's taken on a life of it's own
No. It's been astroturfed by paid media opperatives like Harry Sisson and "JoJo for Jerz"
>We're so popular we have to pay people to support us online
LMAO
The question is whether Harris can respond extemporaneously to detailed policy questions. She has the rah-rah rally performance down pretty good. We do not know much about how she intends to govern over the next four years. What Biden policies will she keep and which one will she change?
Trump doesn't respond to detailed policy questions, so why should she? She's following the Trump playbook, and it's the best thing ever. Her advisors are doing a great job.
Why should she respond to "detailed policy questions"? Trump never does and in fact isn't interested in policies, only in himself, and I'm sure he hasn't even read the Project 2025 that his cronies have written.
Can trump lol? This is such an unserious comment
Some what over 50% . But Trump is working hard to destroy any chance he might have had
I hate the argument about the primary, what person in their right mind would give up their seat to try and win a presidential election with less than 100 days of campaigning
What CAN'T you get away with as a Democrat in the media?! Have you ever turned a TV on before hahaha
Trump "press conference" about nothing at all, just an interminable flood of blatant lies and no-one called him out. Why does the bar have to be so low for Trump and so high for everyone else?
Oof shes not a good candidate. She's just not Biden lol.
Better yet, she's not Trump, and frankly, there is a sufficient number of people who are tired of Trump
@@charlie7827 I look at policies not personality and Trump has better policies. Kamala has not even put her policies on her website like every other candidate past or present.
She did nothing about the border.
[Source: U.S. Customs and Border Protection website]
2019 Southern Border Encounters 851,508 (Remain in Mexico Policy initiated by Trump)
2020 Southern Border Encounters 400,651
2021 Southern Border Encounters 1.73 million (Remain in Mexico Policy terminated by Biden)
2022 Southern Border Encounters 2.37 million
2023 Southern Border Encounters 2.47 million
..oh, you be a...CLOWN! lol🤡🤡🤡💩💩💩
That vid could be a third shorter if 'like' was edited out.
4:20 they weren’t kinda lying about Biden’s fitness, they were out right lying
Yooo @32:00 y’all need a correction. He did not say that. Listen to the full clip.
Nate Silver isnt the guru he thinks he is
There is a 90% chance you don't know what he thinks of himself.
Progress, abundance, freedom, safety net. America is great!
Hello Act Blue? Earning your paycheck?
@@LordRykard9376 DNC Wumao desperate to pay their student loans.
😂😂😂
They actually have a candidate that they KNOW they cannot let speak. The only ... THE ONLY chance Kamala has if they do not let her speak. Inspiring ! btw WOW that couch joke was ... hilarious! (eye roll)
Yeah, they can't let him speak, so they are trying to keep him locked up in Mar-a-Lago. All that crap about Hannibal Lecter and sharks.
99%... because nothing has changed since 2020.
There's definitely been changes since 2020. Gas is up, my paychecks are down, food is more expensive, and housing cost is crazier than the cost of gas. I *WISH* nothing has changed since 2020.
@@cavalieroutdoors6036 You miss the recession of 2020?
The shortest recession in history?
@@ajblum58there was no recession in 2020.
Weird is wonderful.
“She was the vice President but she wasn’t the president” is so strange to me, I associate the VP with everything their boss did, they basically exist to defend the other guys policies and Harris defended all of Biden’s just like normal.
I categorically disagree with Zach here. It is not the "Daily Reason Roundup". It is the Mourning Lynx, and Liz Wolfe is a national treasure for her work.
37:28
This is why I think the game democracy 4 is unbalanced.
Basically if you make the economy boom in that game your nearly guranteed to be voted out of office.
As far as I can tell its becuase there are a shitton of negative consequences to higher gdp the way the model is designed. So you get punished if gdp and productivity go up.
you're talking polls, I have to wonder how accurate that actually is and if the real deal will be cheating instead
This was a boring interview.
Are you serious, they would have had to return $250M full stop
I think the best thing Harris' campaign can do for her is keep her tucked in and have her talk for as little as at all possible. Every time she opens her mouth in public, she loses voters.
@@ambidexter2017
How do you know she loses votes, do they call you, do you take a poll, or did you just make that up.
Maybe if she talked about Hannibal Lecter or getting eaten by sharks or praised Putin would be ok, right?
Literally the opposite of true. The more she and Walz speak, the more people remember how nice it is to have articulate politicians that talk about issues they actually care about.
@@robertspringer896No, the more they grow reacquainted with a time when they could shut their minds off and pay no attention whatsoever.
Ah, comforting.
People don't want to see people on TV like they did with Trump.! People want normalcy . People want difference even some policies aren't up to what we want .
People like you guys think there's only one right answer and that is your answer. Why wasn't people as upset a year after covid ended and vote on that issue like I did? Because when people get out of prison, they celebrate.
It sounds like Nate Silver doesn't have a grasp on what Trump is when he says "Trump is pretty far to the right". Either that or Silver doesn't understand conservatives at all, which I suppose could be equally likely. If Silver doesn't understand one or both, then what value could he have in this interview?
"Right" and "Left" are vague ideas to begin with but Conservatism is a vast range of ideas, and doesn't really mean much of anything on its own.
Trump is a right wing populist, and it's not wrong to call him "far right".
@@shaun7142 I'd like to make a point, but to do this I need to define "far to the right" in a political sense which should be obvious and logical. I know this is a leap since so much of the media disparages people who lean right in their politics, so much that somehow "far right" is equated to being a racist bigot. Even if this is the most common use of "far right", this really is nonsense. The most logical understanding of "far to the right" should be a political ideology that synergizes with longstanding, centuries long traditions common to American peoples through history. In more practical terms this means if a Protestant god says a thing is good, than that thing is good. It also means that people far to the right never want anything to change ever.
I see though that the next step would be to state the positions of such an ideology and then show that Trump is so far removed from these positions that there is no way you could possibly associate him with this. This might actually take more effort than I would like to give.
In any case, I'll just state that while Trump is himself not strongly ideological, the best way to describe him if you had to pin him down would be a Progressive Republican. In other words if you removed all of the political strategy that he wields as a politician and left him only with ideology, that is what would be left. Granted though that he is about 95% politician and about 5% ideologue, so this is removing almost everything that he is.
Positionally Trump is very much on the left side of the Republican party. Populists like him, but that doesn't mean anything in this context. Populism isn't exclusive to either side of the political spectrum. It doesn't describe whether a person is more or less traditional in their policy preferences which really is what this is about.
There is a point though that I will concede, though I'll concede it on my terms. It is easier to define purists, and being "far to the right" should logically be a purist position. Conservatism can contain a vast range of ideas as you say, however I quibble with this idea when it refers to a "far to the right" political ideology.
> It also means that people far to the right never want anything to change ever.
No, that's extreme conservatism.
Think about it this way, how would you categorize a right-wing anarchist?
Most people would consider them "far right", as well as fascists (real ones), right-wing dictators, etc.
> Populism isn't exclusive to either side of the political spectrum.
Neither is conservativism.
> There is a point though that I will concede, though I'll concede it on my terms. It is easier to define purists, and being "far to the right" should logically be a purist position.
But there is no standard for the right-wing, even with your definition that doesn't actually encompass what the right-wing is.
@@shaun7142 The original right wing party when this whole right/left idea was created were the French Royalists who wanted to reverse the reforms of the French Revolution and restore the House of Bourbon and the Catholic Church. So yes, the right is conservative in the sense that conservatism means "to preserve", or at least "to restore tradition". Extreme conservatism is logically what the far right represents. : the restoration of tradition, the restoration of traditional forms of order, ect. If *"Most people would consider them "far right", as well as fascists (real ones), right-wing dictators, etc."*, then most people are wrong.
@@shaun7142
shaun7142: *"how would you categorize a right-wing anarchist?"*
I think the question already did categorize them as right-wing, so I am not sure what more you would be looking for. Is right-wing meant as a pejorative in this question? Is it implied that this is the ideology of conspiracy nuts? Is it meant to suggest something that doesn't have much to do with where someone lies on a political spectrum?
Anarchists generally come in two flavors. One flavor is of those who desire to overthrow the current order and replace it with another. Another flavor is those who want absolutely no government whatsoever. The second one, though naturally unrealistic as power vacuums never remain as power vacuums, has commonalities with American conservatism. This is only because American conservatism has its roots in limited government and federalism while American liberalism has for a long time been a Wilsonian behemoth. There still remain stark differences between conservatives and anarchists.
Let's try to see both sides of things. Democracy means crossing the aisle and working with views we are unfamiliar with, and coming together for a compromise.
Which isle? The Isle of Man?
Lol I am not going to work with people who support child genital mutilation and are allowing millions of illegals to pour into the country. There's no middle ground with that.
These guys give me the vibes of get out dad before the curtain fell
Haha. Dem VP spreading misinformation. The irony.
I should expect JD Vance to mention horses.
When someone says Trump was outright lying but then never specifies what the lies are - that person is full of shit.
He says he won the 2020 election. He didn't. He says his innauguration crowd was the biggest ever. It wasn't. Those are just two off the top of my head.
I think more people care about using our tax dollars to support foreign wars is a HUGE issue with ALL Americans which unifies libertarians with independents and dems on the Gaza/Ukraine issue.
Can't wait to hear This brilliant mental gymnastics for why we have to dispel with democracy because democracy is on the line😂 we can't leave this one up to the voters folks not if we want to save our democracy AKA Democrats being in power because they don't give a s*** about democracy when they lose
Democrats don't need to fact check their debate opponents. That is what moderators are for.
And the fake news media aka PR wing of the DNC
I do love how you folks copied Triggernometry with the "what question should we be asking" bit.
Very unlikely. My bet is that even the Dems realize that and will, therefore, replace her after the debate(s) ... if she risks participating, that is.
She beat Pence, who did a decent job. Trump debating will be a trainwreck.
She'll win, unfortunately... I remember how positive conservatives were in 2020 that Trump was gonna win.
She'll definitely win like Hillary
@@karthy257 Hillary didn't run in 2020
Yep. She'll win...cause da fix is in. Dont matter who votes....only matters who counts them.
@karthy257 it's not 2016, buddy
@josephhester753 Democraps won in 2020 because of ballot harvesting, which is legal in several states. They did what they had to to win. How tf did Republicans not know this??? Instead, you had Trump throwing a tantrum, and that old lady talking about: "uNlEaSh tHe KrAkEn"..... Dems play CHESS, while Republicans play stupid. 🤦♂️🤦♂️🤦♂️
Great guest.
Who is the libertarian candidate?
26:25 which one of Trump’s policies is far-right Nasty Nate?
Are you calling him nasty because he doesn't shave his face?
I’m calling him Nasty Nate because he’s a liar and a propagandist not because of his appearance. Nasty Nate knows the nonsense he’s spewing isn’t supported by the data. He’s helping the establishment create a narrative to mislead the people period full stop
The comment about the forced vaccination was off from reality.
Less democracy. More liberty.
The couch joke is hilarious
But what if the R’s made up a sorry about Kamala having sex with a goat or a coconut? Would that be fair game and hilarious for Vance to make references to?
Saying "critics are calling how Harris was selected undemocratic" is like saying "critics are saying Hitler wasn't a fan of Jews"
If they cheat again
Trump 2024
😅I can’t Nate silver this is the same guy who said Clinton was going to win
And the look on his face when someone called out in front of the public in a news show. He got both the primary and final election results dead wrong. But that qualifies as an "expert" I guess. If got everything correct, he will be called a "conspiracy theorist" 🤣
Would like to get Nate’s take on the Rasmussen Polls which have Trump ahead in the swing states and winning by 4-5 points. Nate was had HC ahead by 10 points right before 2016 election.
Rasmussen has always favorable to Trump in past election cycles. Even trafalgar has harris +2 in Michigan and only has trump +1 in Wisconsin And + 2 in Pennsylvania. If thats trumps margin then he's in trouble for sure
nate gave trump a 1/3 chance of winning before election day. That's about as high as any data-based predictor had trump's odds.
@@charlie7827 Trafalger has Harris up by 1% in MI. But the point is that the MSM is telling us Harris is up in “all the polls” and “Trump doesn’t know what to do”! Utter BS and it’s pure and intentional misinformation. It’s a lie.
Not sure why people are listening to Nate PotMetal.
Terrible show...11 mins in and boring. Bye
Nate Tin was underwhelming.
Walz still a drunk driver?
Trump still a 34x felon?
@@robertspringer896no, actually.
How is JD Vance mean spirited?
If you're ok with Gov. Gav. then you're ok with Harris.
MACA
Make America California Already!
Trump is Weekend at Bernie's now. 😂
No. There - saved you an hour
15:00 the issue was vp harris shutting down free speech. it was not about the war. which is what was pivoted to by these harris apologists.
No
i hope harris wins by 1000 votes
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ easy heels harris …. wins by 42 votes
Headboard Harris already won. 😂😂 Cackle Cackle!!
Lol why
So she's not winning by 81 million votes 🤔
0
You guys are part of the problem somebody who is super supportive of trans people is definitely more weird than JD Vance