Sam Harris basically breaks down the secret to life (again)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 ก.พ. 2022
- 5 years later and Sam does it again #shorts
Here is the first part:
• Sam Harris basically u...
Clip taken from:
"Questioning Sam Harris | Sam Harris | The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast S4: E81"
Both of these men are legends.
Yeah and I feel grateful we have them alive today
Jordan Peterson believes in the Bible as the true words of God. I don't consider him a legend.
@@Frazer247 No-one is perfect, but he’s helped thousands of people like myself better themselves and escape depression, so I do :)
Peterson looks like a defeated hobo. In fact I think he had a nervous breakdown if I’m not mistaken.
@@Jervisdude Up yours, woke moralist! We'll see who cancels who!
Knowing nothing about the context of this or the original discussion, JP popping up was literally a jump scare.
Right? I was listening in the shower. Good job cos I shat myself
😂
This really changed my perspective on the “prisoner of my thoughts” fallacy. I’m now going to treat myself like I’d treat a friend. Enlightening
I always did that be your own best friend put yourself on the first place you will naturally not care what other people think of you
What is this fallacy you are referring to? Can't find anything through Google.
@@_xiper Meaning the common conditioning that the self, the me, the thinker, the observer etc, is something separate or different from the rest of the content of conciousness. It is a fallacy, an illusion. The thinker is not different from thought, the thinker is the thought.. thought has created the thinker.
@@_xiper my reading is that we believe our thoughts are us, our lives - but they are not - most thoughts are automatic, default mode generated by our neural programming - we can dis identify with the narrative that is our thoughts - stop believing the thoughts.....
Remind yourself of that ………..in psychosis
I respect the two for still willing to engage in important subjects despite their disagreements in certain topics
Well... it's advantageous to do so.
I think there's actually a subtle disagreement between them here, or at least Jordan isn't quite grokking it. He keeps thinking of it in terms of the method mentioned at the end, of reshaping existing thoughts by noticing negative thoughts, rather than letting go of the whole prospect of identification with thought in the first place.
Marcus Aurelius Antonius - "Treat the next thought with care so that nothing irrational creeps in"
Seneca - “What progress, you ask, have I made? I have begun to be a friend to myself.”"
This kind of insight existed thousands of years ago... it just got replaced...
Replaced? I just read a TH-cam comment quoting some of its original authors and Meditations has been available in English print since the 1600s?
buddhist / hindu teachings of meditation and wisdom of mind also existed around 2000 BC even earlier, written in many forms. and the stoics, martial arts and taoism also mentions this along with many other wise philosphies. I do whcih more verbal credit were given to the ancient wisdoms that already taught all these insights (such as Gautama Buddha, the human buddha from india who started buddhism), but maybe in the full videos they give credit. But yeah, buddhsim, hinduism and taoism and stoicsism and all these other wise philosphies talk abotu the same thing
The dry delivery of the gum drops line had me giggle out loud a bit.😂
timestamp?
I have to be honest. I used be really into this mindset that you could come to a good pace in your life just but fixing your mind and how you process things but all the biggest changes in my well-being and daily mood were the result of real changes in my external environment and life. Getting over a medical problem I thought would be permanent and spending more time with friends who love me as opposed to being socially isolated. I’m not saying having a better mindset and learning to have a healthier relationship to your thought and conscious experience can’t be invaluable, just that you really shouldn’t neglect other parts of your life to feel better let alone think others can either. Please love yourself and everyone else :)
Like being able to let go and not always trying to fix things is really important but I don’t think it alone would be satisfying for most people.
Totally agree! I don't agree with the notion of "nothing outside of you can make you happy"....and that it's all about your mind and your thoughts. I have lived that way and it sure helped when I was stressed and anxious, but I don't find it to be the way to the good life...
In the philosophy that Sam is espousing, there's no real distinction between internal and external. They're two sides of the same coin. And in the Buddhist tradition, the Middle Way (i.e. balance) is the most prudent path.
It's all mind, including your external environment, because your outer life reflects your inner life. So, in the final analysis, it does all come down to the quality of your mind.
@@counterculture10 I think there are context where the distinction is important though.
"imagine that... 🤔"
Directed by
Robert B. Waide
Sam Harris: 'If every thought that we had was externalized on a loudspeaker , every normal person would sound insane'.
It’s so true !! If we are honest to ourselves , we are all crazy 😅
In my early formative years (16-25), I took a fair amount of hallucinogens. LSD, Mushrooms, Mesc, X (MDMA). No preconceived notions. No expectations except to have fun. What it did was change my perspective on life. The breaking of the Ego. The third eye. Understanding thoughts and emotions intellectually. If you can strip everyday life away for a short period of time and not be burdened by it, and with an open mind, there is a lot of self discovery to be had. You can do it without the hallucinogens, but that's a long term endeavor and not as much fun.
Right on, brother
Was it the drug or your intention? It's as if it brings out what was in us and out there all along. Curiously, like a psychological amplifier, it provides excess where there was (relative) lack.
@@lukedmoss I think you meant "access". And yes, I think it opens a gateway. It still "changed my perspective", but didn't create it.
@@thesquee1838 interesting analysis for sure. I too question the idea that these drugs "unlock" any sort of insight, at least in a way distinct from other life changing events. NDEs or identity shifts. People do rate these experiences as the most meaningful events in their lives, alongside such things as childbirth, marriage, etc... And yet some people still trip and fall into some unhinged bigotry or use it to double down on hate. I think it's a disservice to say that there is something intrinsic to these substances. No, they just show you what was there all along, and there's still some relative freedom of interpretation at play. Still marvelous that such a thing exists. But consciousness is strange even without them.
In response to OP, my original intent was indeed to say that these show us our "excess" in the sense of Zizek, meaning that our experienced self is fundamentally distinct from our symbolic identity, and that psychadelic reveal that to such a startling resonance that cannot be ignored. In that sense, it can bypass years of subjectivation and being encultured in the world. And I hope most people that experience that expansive feeling do feel closer to their fellow living beings. Ego death can happen many ways, and not always does it end in good grace. It does make the unconscious more accessible in this way.
But I'm just waffling at this point, and generalizing a bit. I've always understood drugs as a tool, a device for fun and reflection. Creative flourishing. It can just as easily be vice, used for escape and destruction. Reinforcing prejudice.
Psychological Amplifiers. It shows us what we are - beyond words. Any articulation after that is subject to perspective.
You ruined your life
Sam’s clarity of thought is astounding. He has such a firm grasp of his idea and how to explain it.
Just wish it wasn’t cut off, as he was about to explain the second method of instead of just having more positive internal conversations, seeing internal conversations as just objects to be witnessed and not to identify with.
The thing that Sam Harris talks about around 8:30 : You would sound insane if your thougths were on a loudspeaker. You can actually read Ulysses and Finnegans Wake. Joyce used this as a novel novel technique called stream of consciousness. That is exactly what they are talking about...
Have you ever actually tried to read that trash?
@@AdamSumner-tb9uu Ulysses is no trash, but Finnegans Wake is not for my taste...
I love that Peterson has also played with this line of thinking, where an effective mental exercise to overcome negative self-talk you should treat yourself as though you're someone you're taking care of. My gf framed it in another way that I thought was so great, where if I'm really beating myself up about certain things, it isn't just that I'm hurting myself, it's the equivalent of me hurting someone she loves and that if anyone talked about me like that she wouldn't stand for it, even if it's me doing it.
I've been following Sam since 2014, and the notion of non-identification with thought is something I heard before early on. It took me a while to understand it, and in one of my meditation sessions I had a glimpse of that tiny space between my consciousness and thoughts that are arising. It's a profound experience, but it's not a perennial experience.
I still have never experienced it
@@Fullyautomagic I am not sure what to advise people about it. But I just use the waking up app by Sam and follow the instructions. I also listen to a lot of conversations in the app which gives me insight into my experience. My awareness during a meditation session is better when I am relaxed and not anticipating the meditation session to end to do other things, also I noticed that the noise in my mind gets amplified when I have coffee before meditation. So now I drink coffee at least after my morning meditation.
it's definitely not perennial but i think with practice it will slowly creep into your life more and more until you're in that state for a fair amount of time. but of course, everyone will relapse from time to time.
@@Joeyblannn yes I agree that non-identification with thought will can never be perfect and constant or perennial, but it can be developed and strengthened. I think that it is the key to life and that in the state of true mindfulness then your life problems are solved.
@@David_Michael_Perez we are extremely lucky people to have grasped this concept TBH. i hope everyone else does as well because sheesh this reduces so much unecessary suffering. Have a great life brother!
The way out is to Choose the pain. Then look to see perhaps what color it is. Then choose another. Make its shape bigger, etc. When you don't allow the purpose of the pain to control your reaction or actions. When you start to play with the source, it gets 'bored' and eventually seeks another path to move your behavior.
Ya…interruptions were not helpful
As Peterson suggests, I don't think recursive self-referential thoughts are accounted for by different brain regions "communicating" with each other to ultimately move a behavior towards a goal.
"Well, here I am."
"What did I have for lunch again?"
"I like this song."
I think recursive thinking functions to either bootstrap or help corroborate a perspectival or social sense of self. Whether or not that function also helps bring about behavior that reaches a goal might be only incidental.
Reminding yourself that life is actually happening in this very moment, is productive in order to decouple from our deceiving evolutionary instincts of getting a dopamine kick by looking back with nostalgia or forward with unrealistic excitement and expectations. Suffering resides in these two states of mind.
Itchy bummis holis
Actually, I can relate to the idea that we are many brains (lobes) each functioning as a mouthpiece for what gives it pleasure or displeasure.
to control experience, sweet point
Hat to crack up a bit when JP popped up suddenly lol
Good share though, TY
It sounds as Sam is focusing here on the distinction between observation of the input vs. processing the input. But then he goes deeper one layer, he distinguishes input from observation of the input, then certain levels of observation... one being purely capturing the sensation (almost as if you could look at your hand but only chose to recognize base sensation of the colour and shape without giving it a meaning of any kind), then the next one is assigning the meaning of the sensation without extrapolating the purpose and context of the sensation. So he is breaking it down temporally. He is trying to observe himself and all the processes happening in his head, searching for the root if intent, out of anything contextualized. In fact, any recognition of context would push him out of the observing state, and he would have to observe what caused him to contextualize.
It's my parent self telling my child self to get a drink. Sometimes there is a push pull over decision-making. The subconscious= childhood experiences, past
Consciousness-parent self, adult, present moment.
The war within, the self doubt insecurities, and shame dialog in the mind is merely programed from childhood external influences. Those we attached to as our identity before having the cognitive ability to question.
I often refute what JP says I find that he talks too much to say nothing, but he made a solid point regarding Sam's example "I should go get some water" it seems logical to me that the brain's connections communicate through internal monologue And this could explain the origin of our thoughts.
i didnt know ben stiller had a twin
8:55 The fact that Jordan was able to answer Sam’s riddle about “the I talking to me” concept with a potentially legitimate answer about the prefrontal cortex talking to your motor cortex in a couple seconds was wildly impressive
Many similar insights were also written in ancient buddhist / hindu philosophies from around 2000 BC and even before. along with other ancient wisdoms from greece, india, china etc. Ancient problems of mind had ancient soloutions. It is good that the benifit of meditation is finally being realised in the mainstream again, after being supressed for a long time during the era of british-empire / colonialism
The key takeaway is that there is no observer (self) that is observing thought. Because the observer is itself a thought. Therefore you are not a John Doe who has to pay his bills, John Doe is a thought in a brain. And yes its not your brain because, well... there is no you behind the brain, its all inside it and its nothing more than a thought/image/memory.
Where can we find the full version of this?
On Jordan yt channel
the pathways are static, motility is dynamic, enlightment is creative,,, internal guru Tilopa to Naropa
Really needed this reminder. Reminds me a lot of the principles talked about in The Power of Now
my sincere question for Sam Haris: "would a person with trained mindfulness fare better when dimentia finally arrive? would he still have even a pinch of mindfulness left to be aware that his mind is probably in dimentia?"
interesting
EK Lim--I believe there are some studies that show that mindfulness has some effect on anxiety in patients with dementia. However if the dementia is very far developed, I am afraid that not much can be done :(. Quite a terrible illness.
@@joshboston2323 I agree. Never heard of any Olympic level meditator successfully fighting off dimentia
@@eklim2034 are the high level mediators that have dimentia ?
@@zibtihaj3213 eventually many will
Did anyone else catch the Easter egg at 3:45? It totally blew my mind!
Right, dissolving the false "I" into the ocean of Pure Consciousness is a great asset. To get there, no problem. Access "Mahamritunjaya mantra - Sacred Sounds Choir" and listen to it for 5 min per day for at least two weeks. Eventually you will tap into the realm of Sat-Chit-Ananda (Truth-Consciousness-Bliss) that transcends the mind. In due time with more practice (whatever methods you choose), the false "I" vanishes, dissolving into the infinite Absolute Ocean of Consciousness "In-Itself": The entire universe is that Essence. The Realization of that is an ongoing process, usually..
Pain is something that can easily be dismissed in the abstract, harder to dismiss in the moment.
100%
I agree, especially profound suffering. And I don't think Harris, or any serious teacher of mindfulness would say this can be avoided in life. But ultimately, I think meditation can be a tool to help mitigate it, even in the moment.
Pain can’t be dismissed In the moment, but you can dismiss all the unnecessary suffering that comes with it. When you have a heartburn you can either accept and observe the painful sensation or spiral into panic worrying about perceived heart attack. Same with social interactions where you tell yourself stories that aren’t necessarily true
They are discussing what Mestre Eckart found out in the 13th century, and Eckart Tolle has revived in his book The power of now!
Buddhist philosophy really
The wisdom of Buddhist philosophies of impermanence and theory of mind versus the abandoned ideas of Carl Jung
Abandoned ideas of Carl jung?
@@Fullyautomagic Jung is really an historical footnote in the development of psychotherapy. Most of his ideas, while entertaining, are not scientific, not falsifiable. Archetypes is an example. These ideas are little better than astrology, which Jung also liked. JP has made a living repackaging Jung into conservative and Christian apologetics.
WTFAY. Clueless?
There is a tendency as a side effect in the mindfulness meditation world. Sam named a thought intrusive that really shouldn't be seen as an intrusive thought.
A thought is usually deemed intrusive if it is a dark thought deeply against your own values and if you suffer from it. if all thoughts become this , you have a problem.
A problem that can arise as a side effect..sometimes i feel better if i just live and think and not care about whether i'm thinking the same thing 10 time on a row..
"Like it or not, life is but a dream."
Row, row, row your boat…
Truly is the secret. Sam's explanation is so good here, but this will remain a secret to those who haven't experienced what he's referring to. There is no name for it. Awareness itself, not awareness of something, is the best way to state it for me.
Sam Harris is acting like Freud didn't say all of this 100+ years ago lmao. what a hack
Watching these two interplay is like the marriage of religion (JP) and spirituality (SH)
It’s really great to see these two get along and coordinate their wisdom.
Ekhart Tolle explained way better in his book A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life's Purpose
He really did
Sam Harris will probably struggle to explain it because he believes awareness is a quality of the individual
Talking to one's self is a selected trait that lends well to one's sanity and tribal inclusion. The brain doesn't need to 'talk' to itself.
In Buddhism it’s called second arrow suffering
Harris avoided the spot on question aboiut thoughts that its the cortex trlling you to take action because you are thirsty, which is the logical thing thoughts are fot to inform you and you to take action.
Its just a bad example, a better one would be, i need a drink , my life sucks.
"Make your mind into a friend or a loved one even. Yeah imagine that"
His vocal tone is so influential and likeable. He would make it far in politics , and I feel like he wouldnt play the woke bs like his party has been doing lately. I'd vote for him as long as he continues to not hold punches and keeps saying what he thinks and not giving a damn about the reaction of little baby liberal Kamala worshipers .
His kind of politics has taken a kicking across the world since 2008. Hence, his inability to comprehend what led to the election of Trump
Little baby conservatice @RossJWick will be crying tears for decades when the life-long con-man and civally liable sexual-predator DJT is locked up in prison for life and MAGA covlapses back into the morass of fascistic confusion it emerged from. MAGA are the real snowflakes----such babies that they cannot believe or accept that their loser in chief lost an election, such they are willing to commit violence to assert their wills. Just look at JP---crying all the time, too.
He’s a Jew, dude.
this whole explanation is essentially Nietzsche’s Freud and Schopenhauer’s idea
Where is the rest of the interview? He was in the middle of an explanation and just getting the second solution. I guess it was just recognizing that the thoughts are not you.. but still would have liked to have heard the rest.
"Questioning Sam Harris | Sam Harris | The Jordan B. Peterson Podcast S4: E81"
The reason Peterson interrupts alot is because he's relating Sam's points to his own experience in order to incorporate them into his belief-structure.
It merely appears to be rude superficially.
And I think I can speak for Sam when saying that he didn't perceive it to be rude but rather amusing in a way.
Unless of course Sam's thoughts tell him otherwise 😁🙏
Fascinating
It seems that there is no-one who does this better than Harris. Where philosophy, neuroscience and intense meditative practice meet in an out-spoken clear thinker.
Sam Harris didn't do anything but attempt to distill basic Buddhist teachings on mindfulness, and he didn't do it as well as the Buddha or the sutra. He usually makes things a bit more complicated than they really are.
Sam is gradually learning more and more about self-awareness.
Why do Sam's headphone cords gotta be twisted
To test you being mindful of your OCD:s
Since I was a kid, probably 1 or two weeks of age, I used to ask my parents: ``mom and dad, when you say ``I have to think about myself`` ... who is ``I``? Who is talking? Who is the ``owner of the self``?``
😂
When I was in uterus cca. 36th week, I read Marcus Aurelius and said, "D'uh..."
@@JumpingJack79 😂
I wonder what Sam would think about dialogical self theory in light of his point on our internal dialogues
My thoughts turned into external voices, it has helped me identify them as not me. It helps.
That's not good, then you sound crazy.
Yeah, dude that's schizophrenia
7:55 What the fuck was that interjection? xD
He means a lot of your inner thoughts are prioritized by the self and ego, but the ego can be influenced in a society, where everyone is connected through the zeitgeist.
In other words, how do you know what is rational? You need society and other people as audience and judges for you to determine what is rational.
@@C_CREATURE_ Maybe we need nothing but silence and god to be rational. Society is what drives us mad
I keep having to remind myself that we are doing life. Hope you all succeed
Jp needs to shut up and let Sam talk
You're so resentful
Sam would disagree with you on that
I once talked to myself, I'll never try THAT again ........
Omg my brain is crashed
a practiced meditator doesn't notice the body, it vanishes. Same with thought both on and off the cushion.
They linger in the realm of curiosity.
@@jonber9411 stupid reply as curiosity requires thought and mental input. when the citta is still, there can be zero thought.
@nothinghere1996 Thank you. You actually reinforce what I meant. But failed to see what I meant 😉
@@jonber9411 oh, then my apologies.
🙏 😊
@@jonber9411 what is the objective of wipasana, do you know?
great post
Cut the interruptions JP.
Never expected Ben Stiller to be so wise!
...
Gold
literally
isn't he just basically saying don'[t overthink it?
YOU are not the voice in your head. In fact the voice is not nomally your 'friend'. It keeps you stuck. YOU are the observer of the voice, the chooser of your reaction to THE VOICE.
Oh my word,the interruptions 🤦🏾♀️ let the man speak.
Oh god, jordan peterson at 2 minutes in. shit, I've been tricked!
The interruptions…. Why derail Sam when there’s no chance you can add anything meaningful…
sam looks stoned
Perhaps you don’t understand the purpose of conversation. What you’re after is a monologue.
JP has a lot of meaningful things to say
Coz JP enjoys talking and pontificating, more than he does listening to other people.
After all, he's important dammit
@@kamalhwail2592 “no chance you can add anything meaningful.” What exactly do you mean? Sam and Jordan have spoken for at least 15 hours on podcasts or debates and both say meaningful things often. I don’t understand what you mean.
The 'secret to life' (if anything) would rather be not being a self-centered little man-/woman-child. No tricks of attention etc. can replace that.
All comes back to the now. Thoughts are only illusions come into awareness back to the now. Choose the consciousness…
Sam Harris seems to be more spiritual than Jordan Peterson.
Peterson associates the internal dialogue with the brain activity.
However, when I need to drink water, I don't need the internal dialogue to initiate a motor response. I can move my hand without it.
But as Sam points out, it's so ever present that it doesn't strike people as strange. Even somebody like Jordan Peterson.
It's really odd that Peterson doesn't know about the danger of this internal dialogue.
absolutely.. but seems to be it's because of the western philosophical tradition that Peterson is a product of that hasn't integrated consciousness and identity effectively with living reality.
@@VigilanteTribe That's right.
Spiritual is the wrong word. But they both oscillate is an out of scientific realism vs psychological spirituality
@@ShaneGillisClips I'm not sure if psychological spirituality is a better word. They are just words. If words could represent the reality, everything would be clear. Unfortunately, we can only use words approximately, and not exactly. Spiritual, material, physical, meta-physical. They are just concepts. Nothing more than that.
Sam is a logical speaker, so he would be a fan of the brain activity explaining the processes, I doubt he's a more spiritual person than Jordan, Jordan is the one who acts as if God exists here lol. Sam is on the side of 'I'm not sure what's happening here' because we don't know too much about neurology at this point in time. If the answer were out there, Sam would be the one to hop on that wagon. Since we don't know what the deal is, he can only say 'not sure what's happening, but this idea of free will is merely an illusion' which I agree with.
“All thoughts are all lies All the time”
Jesse Lee Peterson lol
Exactly... Something about have two ears and one mouth😊
Your amazing 👏 your soooooo amazing 👏 your so amazing 👏 your so amazing 👏
1:23
I put my hand on the stooooove… and nothing hurts anymore, I feel kinda freeeeeeeeeee
“Yeah, yeah” = absolutely not
Now if he can only figure out how to admit a mistake.
Pain and suffering are the only things that are real in this illusion ,the rest is down a wonky perception based on a given state of mind ,man is like a river ,everything flows
Thought isn’t about anything explains Peter Brown. These men are obsessed with thought, just look at them.
Too many interjections to enjoy!! 😂
“Totalitarian spirit of rationality that proclivity” @7:55 Jordan’s word salad again on par with Chopra!. Why can’t he talk in plain English.
It's interesting that your conscience thoughts only speak to you in the languages you know. It's clear that your thoughts are cultural uploads to your brains database. There are different experiences of consciousness, because we are not a monolith of culture.
Dialled you best him there and he didn’t even realize
Clever dudes. That was great
9:38
The title is disingenuous "Breaks down the secret of life"?, seriously, nah.
Podcasts that talk about the problem 99% of the time with 1% solutions are getting old. He gets to the solution at the end saying there’s two levels and the 2nd gets cut off. Weak!
"Just repeat smart ideas on internet and hate on muslims" then make money
thinkingness is overrated. Most thoughts are useless noise.
The more we think the less happy we are. Everything good comes from experiancing the world without any judgement or thought
All thoughts are all lies all of the time.
Both fo them when death nears them, will look for meaning, at least to conquer death, samsara, or know your mind.
just meditate
Much ado about very little, which bring us back to, for me; What is all this dissent about between us all? Spirits or something like it, hurtling through space on a blue dot. And we find the time for hate. I do my best not to. Peace
this conversations shows the utter patheticness of how far we understand ourselves. That we backslap for observing such toad like behaviour