@@jagdeepkumar975 pehli baat to kisi ke naam mei sir/ma'am ni lagane se respect kam ni hoti hai. Shri Shri 108 laga lo, wo aapki marzi hai. And dusri baat, mera reply aapko shayad samajh ni aaya. TH-cam pe search kijiye jo maine reply kiya for context. Point being you are an offense-taking sissy who has edited your comment now to tone down the hate you were spewing, and so have I 😂.
@@jagdeepkumar975 Kyun bole sir??? Uska baap hai kya Swamy?? If he wants to give respect to Swamy woh dega ya nahi dega. Teri gaand kyuon jal rahi hai papa??
thats the nation's strength and not loss and also the reason that he has been delibrately kept out... because being out of the cabinate he can say things to both sides without them taking prejudice against him....
I am sorry we might agree on a lot of things (based upon the kind of videos we watch) but I respectfully disagree when it comes to UCC, however, instead of just opposing you I'm more interested in knowing what you are basing your opinion on mainly what is it that you think we will gain by UCC, what do you think we might lose and are the gains worth the losses? Just to give an idea about my approach, I agree the constitution demands it and that it would mean equality in a larger sense but I think we as Hindus by insisting on UCC have more to lose than gain. I may be wrong hence I am more interested in knowing rather than debating. regards
@@vmike7946 which in my view can be done anyway without even UCC like population control bill, for marriage and might I add for a share in the ancestral property to girls we can pass a separate regulation, which will apply to all. in fact these regulations except the population control already apply to Hindus. So what do we have to gain while we risk losing all the benefits? take this example on a lighter note, the current situation with personal laws allows a Muslim man to have 4 wives and a Hindu can claim various economic benefits for an Undivided family. So a Muslim man ends up paying more for 4 wives while Hindus save money under 80C. now we lose those benefits for ensuring that Muslim man won't have more than one wife doesn't make sense to me. See I am trying to understand your point, in my view people who ask for UCC want it for equal treatment of people which cause of personal law boards is hindered in some sense and as you say if it will cover only a few things then that purpose is defeated anyway cause after this whole exercise we would still have a few contentious laws. So whether or not the UCC is beneficial is something that can be interpreted only once we know what it covers and we can ascertain gains vs losses properly. perhaps then we can decide whether it should be applied or not. I'm sorry it got wordy, but I'm eager to know more about it specifically in terms of what we as a community gain vs lose. Thanks for responding.
H S I have watched at least 3-4 hr talks by Supreme Court advocate J Sai Deepak & he comes across as the most knowledgeable and practical oriented with clarity on the subject and I would only give my contribution to Indic collective!!
Secularism is the first step to imposing sharia..secularism buys them time to grow in population.. Grow, riot, and conquer was the strategy used for partition of india..
Haha indian secularism say you can practice the religion you want (Just like hinduism), by insulting it u r saying, Sikh i will not allow u to practice sikhism, to buddhist no more buddhism, to jews no more judism, to hindus no more hinduism.
We many reapetedly saying , Jai Jai SS (Subramanian Swamy ) is consider to be God Sri Krishna of our times. Brilliant , courageous , Genius , High knowledge , Great thinker many many. He is Simply Supper. India needs many such. God bless for him ever. Jai Jai SS.
@Hari Om from Wiki : The total Indian population in 1951 was about 36 crore and currently (2017) about 130 crore. The population-share of Hindus in 1951 was 84% and those of Muslims 10%, while currently, these percentages are about 80% and 14.5% respectively. In other words, the Hindu population grew from about 30 crore to 104 crore from 1951 to 2017 (about 3.5 times), while the Muslim population grew from 3.6 crore to 18.20 crore (about 5 times). What this means is that the larger Hindu population has grown at about 1.82% every year, while the Muslim growth rate has been 2.45% year on year. Happily, according to the 2011 survey, the population growth rates are now much lower, at about 1.6% for Hindus and 2% for Muslims.
Tomorrow BJP will say Hindus have become minority now and these andh bhakt chutiyas will agree blindly 🤣🤣🤣 and when asked all they can say is "check the census"....btw, I'm an educated brahmin
No brother it is not, please read the origin of the word secularism,nijer mon theke ja Khushi Boolle hobe…..(of course for vote bank politics and unconditional appeasement).
My parents lost everything in partition. My grandfather was killed. A good Muslim advocate, a friend of my grandfather, took the women to their airport for three days at great danger to himself till they got on the plane to Delhi in burkhas and with all their valuables. My great grandfather, my other grandparents, my parents and my aunts and uncles, never harbored hate despite all the trauma of partition. They never brought us up with hate. They were proud of their sacrifices for the nation. Please listen to the words (IN VIDEOS, LINKS AT BOTTOM OF THIS NOTE) of my father, Prof Shanti Swarup, 96, freedom fighter who passed away in March 2020 on Secularism 101--Various good people are muddying the waters about secularism. In my humble view, conceptually and in very simple terms, secularism was something consciously adopted and accepted by people who were tired of civil war and killing each other. It is why Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, Ambedkar, Maulana Azad pursued it for India even if it was formally added into the constitution later. It is the same with the concept of democracy, and the concepts of liberty, fraternity, equality. The whole idea of a constitution. Secularism was never something, anywhere in the world, that people developed or accepted spontaneously. People accepted it because they were tired of hate and wanted to improve their lives and live in peace. People various religions practice their religions privately. In a new democracy, secularism is supposed to be superimposed on various religious groups so they can live together peacefully within one territory and pursue other objectives such as healthcare, food, education, competing with other powers like China. Why are people in India going down the rabid path of looking for cultural causes of the failure of secularism--this is only going to muddy the water further so we make things worse, not better. We have to create a common vision for India together. Yes, reversing Shah Bano judgment was a big mistake for which we have been paying a heavy, heavy price. But we need to move on towards a more perfect union. This why USA, UK, Australia, etc have pursued secularism and they are also trying to move towards a more perfect union. It is why India chose secularism and we must continue to pursue a more perfect union. It is the crux of the point that my father, Professor Shanti Swarup, was covering in his videos here. Please do give a few minutes of your time to review the issue of secularism, specifically in the videos. Thank you. Dhanyawad. Shukriya, bahut meherbani. th-cam.com/video/PRR9EPNUUJw/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/OMjEzJ1JgZ0/w-d-xo.html
Modi is leader because he knows how to lead and manage people, for economy watch what Former President Mr. Pranab Mukherjee or other economist said. Modi knows politics very well and good in comparison to today's politicians that's why he is the Prime Minister.
@@srpratap Every Indian Company is making good money, only few are failed by their owners. Swami is good to poke any politician but his age and experience shows he is not a good minister, some times toppers fails but average give best of their knowledge.
My parents lost everything in partition. My grandfather was killed. A good Muslim advocate, a friend of my grandfather, took the women to their airport for three days at great danger to himself till they got on the plane to Delhi in burkhas and with all their valuables. My great grandfather, my other grandparents, my parents and my aunts and uncles, never harbored hate despite all the trauma of partition. They never brought us up with hate. They were proud of their sacrifices for the nation. Please listen to the words (IN VIDEOS, LINKS AT BOTTOM OF THIS NOTE) of my father, Prof Shanti Swarup, 96, freedom fighter who passed away in March 2020 on Secularism 101--Various good people are muddying the waters about secularism. In my humble view, conceptually and in very simple terms, secularism was something consciously adopted and accepted by people who were tired of civil war and killing each other. It is why Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, Ambedkar, Maulana Azad pursued it for India even if it was formally added into the constitution later. It is the same with the concept of democracy, and the concepts of liberty, fraternity, equality. The whole idea of a constitution. Secularism was never something, anywhere in the world, that people developed or accepted spontaneously. People accepted it because they were tired of hate and wanted to improve their lives and live in peace. People various religions practice their religions privately. In a new democracy, secularism is supposed to be superimposed on various religious groups so they can live together peacefully within one territory and pursue other objectives such as healthcare, food, education, competing with other powers like China. Why are people in India going down the rabid path of looking for cultural causes of the failure of secularism--this is only going to muddy the water further so we make things worse, not better. We have to create a common vision for India together. Yes, reversing Shah Bano judgment was a big mistake for which we have been paying a heavy, heavy price. But we need to move on towards a more perfect union. This why USA, UK, Australia, etc have pursued secularism and they are also trying to move towards a more perfect union. It is why India chose secularism and we must continue to pursue a more perfect union. It is the crux of the point that my father, Professor Shanti Swarup, was covering in his videos. Please do give a few minutes of your time to review the issue of secularism, specifically in the videos. Thank you. Dhanyawad. Shukriya, bahut meherbani. Bari merbani. th-cam.com/video/PRR9EPNUUJw/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/OMjEzJ1JgZ0/w-d-xo.html
@@smitaswarup8562 Anti India activities on name of secularism is not acceptable at all. In my opinion & understanding there is no word "secularism" because we all are follower of one religion or you can say inspired by one, you must have nationalism and think as an Nationalist for your Nation first Ex:- Japan. Secularism overlap with Equality before law, concept. U.S., U.K., Australia,etc have Nation first policy and then concept of equality. These Nations consider extreme Islam as danger and same with communism. We people of Bharat are working on strong & unite Bharat, we know what we are doing.
@@yogeshthakur7319 I don;t favor fundamentalism. I find you hindutva guys have no answers and keep throwing arguments. Ek dusre ko nigal jaoge. China will invade. Us me khush rehna. Divided you will fall like you always have for centuries. Sidhe ho jao. Ek dusre ke sath bana ke rakho. Jo ho gaya so ho gaya. Eye for an eye se kuch nahi hoga. th-cam.com/video/FuFcR7NPqVo/w-d-xo.html
@@smitaswarup8562 Accept it, if you don't have right answers/arguments for my facts. We did mistakes, we thought forgiveness and peace come together but Mughals proves us wrong, impotent leaders are dangerous- we learned this. Now we are a reflection to others, if anyone wants friendship we become true friends eg. Russia, Israel, Japan, etc. if you want to fight we will fight. Hindutva is not a word, the ideology is "Sanatan" :- way of living life. "Hindu" used by Mughals for Bharatiya, we all are Hindu/Bharatiya or English says Indian. We have the capability to Change or accept, Mughals try to convert but get merged, Christians try to convert us they also get merged in Sanatan. We want to live in peace and prosperity but if you try to attacks us, try to interfere, or any type of anti national agenda- not acceptable. Yes we will retaliate and you have to face consequences.
Reservation is not about anything else, but representation. Every group should be in there any institution or government departments. So that they can understand you better. Think of honour killing, that is nothing to do with honour. Who is always affected, why there is denial of justice. no strict laws against it. why? think.... equal representation is not there...
@@indiatas without merits? On what basis EWS group is getting reservations ? They only said others are on reservation, so the quality is going down. Now when they (OC) get it, quality will be maintained ? SX reservation is a reparation
By converting to another faith the individual escapes from the clutches of casteism. Before condemning conversions people should understand why it is so easy for an individual to switch faiths. If tripple talaq is bad then casteism is worse.
There no castism in NE india jst deluded by misionery If u convert becum minority wat d use to accept white supremacy who wil protect indegene religion of india dats simple xcuse to justify.Wat about black wil they convert again atrocities done by whites dnt justify
@@Supervisor-entertainment At least there are Christians like you , who speak against the missionaries . Thanks for the support . We need to force the government to apply Uniform Civil Code for everyone , no privileges based on religion whatsoever!!.
Overall I am happy. Modi sir is doing great job. Swamy plus Amit sir in addition is great. Do we have egos as usual . hope our strong present developments are not hurt. Any which wau. Cudos to you all. May God.s blessings prevail at all times.
Modi listens to this man and still doesnt tell him.anything rather listens to him . To all those who thinks Modi doeant tolerate his critics . Swamy Criticizes Modi based on facts and never does it score any political mileage win election being from same party . ITS A RAW TRUTH THAT MODI HIMSELF BROUGHT SWAMY TO BJP .
Bravo to Mamata who has single handedly fought the communists who have broke the back bone of Bengal and destroyed it. Somehow, Modi and Mamta should get together, they should put aside politics and work together to take Bengal to the next level.
Didi is no less than communists, she has also ruined Bengal, I don't see any great improvements being made to the state since she came into power, but rampant goondaism increased.
Jagan Reddy being Christian didn't sign consent form before entering temple. He entered temple by wearing chappals. His father tried to give three hills of Lord venkateswara to Christian missionaries.
This Swamyji is a walking talking constitution bible of our dear mother India. Its for this and many other reasons he is regarded a very well articulated student who is very free and fair. Many opposition politicians distance themselves from getting involved with him in any debate, fear of getting exposed. Swamyji is our one man army, may he be blessed with good health and a long long life.
Swamy Ji, Modi’s greatness and success is not his super intelligence , your success is your intelligence. His is his sincerity, love of his country and culture. His deep faith and greatness of character! So nobody can be a better PM than him.
“ there should be no adjustments made in the constitution” woah 🤩 Mr Swami !!! It’s always enriching, mesmerizing and exciting listening to you. Not just it is factual, but straight forward and witty at the same time. Huge respect to you sir. Wish to see you as our finance minister ❤️
My parents lost everything in partition. My grandfather was murdered. A good Muslim advocate, a friend of my grandfather, took the women to their airport for three days at great danger to himself till they got on the plane to Delhi in burkhas and with all their valuables. My great grandfather, my other grandparents, my parents and my aunts and uncles, never harbored hate despite all the trauma of partition. They never brought us up with hate. They were proud of their sacrifices for the nation. Please listen to the words (IN VIDEOS, LINKS AT BOTTOM OF THIS NOTE) of my father, Prof Shanti Swarup, 96, freedom fighter who passed away in March 2020 on Secularism 101--Various good people are muddying the waters about secularism. In my humble view, conceptually and in very simple terms, secularism was something consciously adopted and accepted by people who were tired of civil war and killing each other. It is why Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, Ambedkar, Maulana Azad pursued it for India even if it was formally added into the constitution later. It is the same with the concept of democracy, and the concepts of liberty, fraternity, equality. The whole idea of a constitution. Secularism was never something, anywhere in the world, that people developed or accepted spontaneously. People accepted it because they were tired of hate and wanted to improve their lives and live in peace. People various religions practice their religions privately. In a new democracy, secularism is supposed to be superimposed on various religious groups so they can live together peacefully within one territory and pursue other objectives such as healthcare, food, education, competing with other powers like China. Why are people in India going down the rabid path of looking for cultural causes of the failure of secularism--this is only going to muddy the water further so we make things worse, not better. We have to create a common vision for India together. Yes, reversing Shah Bano judgment was a big mistake for which we have been paying a heavy, heavy price. But we need to move on towards a more perfect union. This why USA, UK, Australia, etc have pursued secularism and they are also trying to move towards a more perfect union. It is why India chose secularism and we must continue to pursue a more perfect union. It is the crux of the point that my father, Professor Shanti Swarup, was covering in his videos here. Please do give a few minutes of your time to review the issue of secularism, specifically in the videos. Thank you. Dhanyawad. Shukriya, bahut meherbani. Bari merbani. th-cam.com/video/PRR9EPNUUJw/w-d-xo.html th-cam.com/video/OMjEzJ1JgZ0/w-d-xo.html
Dr Swamy is a very practical man with utmost commonsense, equally fearless & courageous enough to stand by his convictions. we need thousands of such geniuses to bring this great country, realize its innate greatness, shrouded in mystery.
1st time watching Anurag Saxena. He was very poised and clear throughout the interview. Truly enjoyed it. And Swamy Sir, I just became ur fan. On the part on chp 4 of BG, awareness on teachings of BG must be spread to Hindus in India. It's quite sad when we meet Hindus from India here, who themselves hardly know much about the things said in BG, but in practice blindly follow a distorted version of BG.
2029 tak Mulko ko apni jaga pe pochaya jayga.... I support all Bill pass by BJP in Rajya Sabha. Hindu Jag Chuka hai... Hume Nokri nahi chahiye.. Pehle ye Mullo ka kharcha INDIA se hatana hai.. Jai Shri Ram 🚩
After watching this candid conversion between both the notable personal I feel a great regards towards both of you...specially Young Anurag jee dealing with the Temple case...a great work
Long live Dr. Subramanian Swamy for another 100 years. Jai Hind.
Not possible, another 100 years bitch
@@KRChin Are you dumb? 😑 Do you not understand the what he meant to say between the lines.
@@gvbhnnnnnnhh could you please educate me a little bit
th-cam.com/video/Am6UvmKRJuw/w-d-xo.html
is he worth listening?
th-cam.com/video/DHdjc_kbwO8/w-d-xo.html
The only problems with Subramanian Swamy is that he is 80 years old and getting older.
Sir plz aap swamy sir boliye request hai sirf swamy nahi.....meri aap se haath jod k vinti hai
@@jagdeepkumar975 "I am not your yaar"
@@jagdeepkumar975 pehli baat to kisi ke naam mei sir/ma'am ni lagane se respect kam ni hoti hai. Shri Shri 108 laga lo, wo aapki marzi hai. And dusri baat, mera reply aapko shayad samajh ni aaya. TH-cam pe search kijiye jo maine reply kiya for context. Point being you are an offense-taking sissy who has edited your comment now to tone down the hate you were spewing, and so have I 😂.
@@jagdeepkumar975 Kyun bole sir??? Uska baap hai kya Swamy?? If he wants to give respect to Swamy woh dega ya nahi dega. Teri gaand kyuon jal rahi hai papa??
@@arjunnarayanan5474 bro Jagdeep jaise chu.. ek dhundenge tou sav milenge. Ignore him.
Lesser known fact: Dr Swamy used to sit in Harvard law lectures when he was a prof of economics there.
To Vishal Tiwari ;Shri.Dr.Swamy also done 'law ' as here he said truth of lawlessness done leaders in congress and in oppositions .
To ;vishal Tiwari ;Shri.Dr.Swamy also done 'law 'as here he said truth ,lawlessness done .
And yet GST is a success of Jaitley..
So many times Swami proves sonia a liar. Great Swami
Sonia is empty
Bcz swamy know very well about soniya from beginning.
Everybody knows that already
His not being a part of the Government is the nation's loss.
I politics you need to be agile. He is too stiff.
He is above 75....
thats the nation's strength and not loss and also the reason that he has been delibrately kept out... because being out of the cabinate he can say things to both sides without them taking prejudice against him....
TO DECLARE INDIA SECULAR COUNTRY CONGRESS SHOULD BRING BACK PAKISTAN, BANGLADESH...
@@shekarroy6892 get a life
Dr. + Swami = This man, नाम ही काफी है🙏
Mr. Swami is true son of Bharat Mata. He is living a meaningful life & teaching his country men to live as same.
Swami as always “Brilliant”. Also, the questions and overall comments by the interviewer were good. He did his homework.
Barobar
Uniform Civil Code is a must
Alf Sharma
th-cam.com/video/Am6UvmKRJuw/w-d-xo.html
@little neo what do u mean about unity in diversity..a strict discipline required for country's growth but u believe in victim card
Absolutely. Uniform Civil Code MUST be the next move.
TO DECLARE INDIA SECULAR COUNTRY CONGRESS SHOULD BRING BACK PAKISTAN, BANGLADESH.
I am sorry we might agree on a lot of things (based upon the kind of videos we watch) but I respectfully disagree when it comes to UCC, however, instead of just opposing you I'm more interested in knowing what you are basing your opinion on mainly what is it that you think we will gain by UCC, what do you think we might lose and are the gains worth the losses?
Just to give an idea about my approach, I agree the constitution demands it and that it would mean equality in a larger sense but I think we as Hindus by insisting on UCC have more to lose than gain. I may be wrong hence I am more interested in knowing rather than debating.
regards
@@niteshagate474 UCC if comes it vl cover only few things , like marage and birth of 2.
@@vmike7946 which in my view can be done anyway without even UCC like population control bill, for marriage and might I add for a share in the ancestral property to girls we can pass a separate regulation, which will apply to all. in fact these regulations except the population control already apply to Hindus. So what do we have to gain while we risk losing all the benefits?
take this example on a lighter note, the current situation with personal laws allows a Muslim man to have 4 wives and a Hindu can claim various economic benefits for an Undivided family. So a Muslim man ends up paying more for 4 wives while Hindus save money under 80C.
now we lose those benefits for ensuring that Muslim man won't have more than one wife doesn't make sense to me.
See I am trying to understand your point, in my view people who ask for UCC want it for equal treatment of people which cause of personal law boards is hindered in some sense and as you say if it will cover only a few things then that purpose is defeated anyway cause after this whole exercise we would still have a few contentious laws.
So whether or not the UCC is beneficial is something that can be interpreted only once we know what it covers and we can ascertain gains vs losses properly. perhaps then we can decide whether it should be applied or not.
I'm sorry it got wordy, but I'm eager to know more about it specifically in terms of what we as a community gain vs lose.
Thanks for responding.
@@niteshagate474 India needs population control bill, they can separetly introduce this bill in sansad. As far UCB we vl see
Though roasted well by Swamiji the host is good in manners and approach
Its an honor to have been roasted by Dr Swamy :-).
Anuraag Saxena
twitter.com/anuraag_saxena
facebook.com/Anuraag.Saxena.Official/
Anchor did a great job ...
@@anuraag_saxena well, both of you, are on the same team. I don't think he was roasting you. I'm still listening, to.the interview, though.
@@anuraag_saxena but yeah, even being roasted by Dr. Swamy is an honour.
The meaning of secularism in India means being anti-Hindu.
Free temples from government control. How can I contribute for the people who are fighting for this cause.
Join vhs india
Understand Iskcon and support Iskcon
We should ask j sai deepak who is fighting for this in court,anybody know how to do that
Support Indic Collective, Sai Deepak ji is their legal counsel.
Please watch his talks on freeing Hindu Temples on TH-cam.
H S I have watched at least 3-4 hr talks by Supreme Court advocate J Sai Deepak & he comes across as the most knowledgeable and practical oriented with clarity on the subject and I would only give my contribution to Indic collective!!
no need change in Hinduism it's perfect
What about Cast varnas system ?
@@Karthik-zj3yf Cast should be demolished, RSS cheif once said about that. But dont know if BJP would do that.
@@theannunaki3871 not till next decade atleast but it will enventually happen when there is no poor in india
@@theannunaki3871 well it's difficult bcoz casteism is vote bank
@@Karthik-zj3yf Caste based vote bank politics is the root cause of casteism.
Secularism is the first step to imposing sharia..secularism buys them time to grow in population..
Grow, riot, and conquer was the strategy used for partition of india..
and still its going on in front of our eyes
@@Tilak-Chatterjee yes .😑😑😑😖😖😖
Haha indian secularism say you can practice the religion you want (Just like hinduism), by insulting it u r saying, Sikh i will not allow u to practice sikhism, to buddhist no more buddhism, to jews no more judism, to hindus no more hinduism.
We many reapetedly saying , Jai Jai SS (Subramanian Swamy ) is consider to be God Sri Krishna of our times. Brilliant , courageous , Genius , High knowledge , Great thinker many many. He is Simply Supper. India needs many such. God bless for him ever. Jai Jai SS.
Ss absolutely correct
Till now secularism means growth of minorities with suppression of Hindus,Now with BJP justice under way ,long live BJP.
"Growth of minorities " could you elaborate
@Hari Om from Wiki :
The total Indian population in 1951 was about 36 crore and currently (2017) about 130 crore. The population-share of Hindus in 1951 was 84% and those of Muslims 10%, while currently, these percentages are about 80% and 14.5% respectively. In other words, the Hindu population grew from about 30 crore to 104 crore from 1951 to 2017 (about 3.5 times), while the Muslim population grew from 3.6 crore to 18.20 crore (about 5 times). What this means is that the larger Hindu population has grown at about 1.82% every year, while the Muslim growth rate has been 2.45% year on year. Happily, according to the 2011 survey, the population growth rates are now much lower, at about 1.6% for Hindus and 2% for Muslims.
Well said sir....Love u
@@whynot4828 you are expecting answer from an anpad andh bhakts 🤣🤣 lol
Tomorrow BJP will say Hindus have become minority now and these andh bhakt chutiyas will agree blindly 🤣🤣🤣 and when asked all they can say is "check the census"....btw, I'm an educated brahmin
I want to him as pm after modi
I agree
Make him FM, that's all I want NOW
The need of hour is to make him FM and in future PM May be.....i am a big fan of mr Swamy the man of facts
It's difficult man. He's already 80 years old.
Make him now
the person in black pant and coat is standing for about 1:30 hrs .what a man.
I would like to see him as FM.
PM would be better
FM??radio
@@lifearoundwesternghats finance minister
@@mranjith830 ok
I would like to see him even PM. very talented person n honest person.
Secularism means giving respect to other religion not humiliating a religion for appeasing a particular religion for vote bank politics
No brother it is not, please read the origin of the word secularism,nijer mon theke ja Khushi Boolle hobe…..(of course for vote bank politics and unconditional appeasement).
Secularism should mean humanity, free thinking, equality and nation first above everything.
swami ji: roast the host
Why?he had been a good host
Glad to be toasted by the one and only sir :-)
Anuraag Saxena
twitter.com/anuraag_saxena
facebook.com/Anuraag.Saxena.Official/
@@anuraag_saxena Areyy Sir. You were a wondeful host and sport. :)
Varun S Thanks sir.
My parents lost everything in partition. My grandfather was killed. A good Muslim advocate, a friend of my grandfather, took the women to their airport for three days at great danger to himself till they got on the plane to Delhi in burkhas and with all their valuables. My great grandfather, my other grandparents, my parents and my aunts and uncles, never harbored hate despite all the trauma of partition. They never brought us up with hate. They were proud of their sacrifices for the nation. Please listen to the words (IN VIDEOS, LINKS AT BOTTOM OF THIS NOTE) of my father, Prof Shanti Swarup, 96, freedom fighter who passed away in March 2020 on Secularism 101--Various good people are muddying the waters about secularism. In my humble view, conceptually and in very simple terms, secularism was something consciously adopted and accepted by people who were tired of civil war and killing each other. It is why Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, Ambedkar, Maulana Azad pursued it for India even if it was formally added into the constitution later. It is the same with the concept of democracy, and the concepts of liberty, fraternity, equality. The whole idea of a constitution. Secularism was never something, anywhere in the world, that people developed or accepted spontaneously. People accepted it because they were tired of hate and wanted to improve their lives and live in peace. People various religions practice their religions privately. In a new democracy, secularism is supposed to be superimposed on various religious groups so they can live together peacefully within one territory and pursue other objectives such as healthcare, food, education, competing with other powers like China. Why are people in India going down the rabid path of looking for cultural causes of the failure of secularism--this is only going to muddy the water further so we make things worse, not better. We have to create a common vision for India together. Yes, reversing Shah Bano judgment was a big mistake for which we have been paying a heavy, heavy price. But we need to move on towards a more perfect union. This why USA, UK, Australia, etc have pursued secularism and they are also trying to move towards a more perfect union. It is why India chose secularism and we must continue to pursue a more perfect union. It is the crux of the point that my father, Professor Shanti Swarup, was covering in his videos here.
Please do give a few minutes of your time to review the issue of secularism, specifically in the videos. Thank you. Dhanyawad. Shukriya, bahut meherbani.
th-cam.com/video/PRR9EPNUUJw/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/OMjEzJ1JgZ0/w-d-xo.html
India needs Swami to head Finance.
Thoroughly enjoyable interview of swami. Can’t get enough of him, it’s sad he is 80. I wish he lives a healthy 20 more years.
Pray for his longevity.
We want to see Mr Subramanyan Swamy as our Finance Minister at the earliest
Modi is leader because he knows how to lead and manage people, for economy watch what Former President Mr. Pranab Mukherjee or other economist said.
Modi knows politics very well and good in comparison to today's politicians that's why he is the Prime Minister.
@@srpratap Every Indian Company is making good money, only few are failed by their owners.
Swami is good to poke any politician but his age and experience shows he is not a good minister, some times toppers fails but average give best of their knowledge.
My parents lost everything in partition. My grandfather was killed. A good Muslim advocate, a friend of my grandfather, took the women to their airport for three days at great danger to himself till they got on the plane to Delhi in burkhas and with all their valuables. My great grandfather, my other grandparents, my parents and my aunts and uncles, never harbored hate despite all the trauma of partition. They never brought us up with hate. They were proud of their sacrifices for the nation. Please listen to the words (IN VIDEOS, LINKS AT BOTTOM OF THIS NOTE) of my father, Prof Shanti Swarup, 96, freedom fighter who passed away in March 2020 on Secularism 101--Various good people are muddying the waters about secularism. In my humble view, conceptually and in very simple terms, secularism was something consciously adopted and accepted by people who were tired of civil war and killing each other. It is why Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, Ambedkar, Maulana Azad pursued it for India even if it was formally added into the constitution later. It is the same with the concept of democracy, and the concepts of liberty, fraternity, equality. The whole idea of a constitution. Secularism was never something, anywhere in the world, that people developed or accepted spontaneously. People accepted it because they were tired of hate and wanted to improve their lives and live in peace. People various religions practice their religions privately. In a new democracy, secularism is supposed to be superimposed on various religious groups so they can live together peacefully within one territory and pursue other objectives such as healthcare, food, education, competing with other powers like China. Why are people in India going down the rabid path of looking for cultural causes of the failure of secularism--this is only going to muddy the water further so we make things worse, not better. We have to create a common vision for India together. Yes, reversing Shah Bano judgment was a big mistake for which we have been paying a heavy, heavy price. But we need to move on towards a more perfect union. This why USA, UK, Australia, etc have pursued secularism and they are also trying to move towards a more perfect union. It is why India chose secularism and we must continue to pursue a more perfect union. It is the crux of the point that my father, Professor Shanti Swarup, was covering in his videos.
Please do give a few minutes of your time to review the issue of secularism, specifically in the videos. Thank you. Dhanyawad. Shukriya, bahut meherbani. Bari merbani.
th-cam.com/video/PRR9EPNUUJw/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/OMjEzJ1JgZ0/w-d-xo.html
@@smitaswarup8562 Anti India activities on name of secularism is not acceptable at all. In my opinion & understanding there is no word "secularism" because we all are follower of one religion or you can say inspired by one, you must have nationalism and think as an Nationalist for your Nation first Ex:- Japan. Secularism overlap with Equality before law, concept. U.S., U.K., Australia,etc have Nation first policy and then concept of equality. These Nations consider extreme Islam as danger and same with communism. We people of Bharat are working on strong & unite Bharat, we know what we are doing.
@@yogeshthakur7319 I don;t favor fundamentalism. I find you hindutva guys have no answers and keep throwing arguments. Ek dusre ko nigal jaoge. China will invade. Us me khush rehna. Divided you will fall like you always have for centuries. Sidhe ho jao. Ek dusre ke sath bana ke rakho. Jo ho gaya so ho gaya. Eye for an eye se kuch nahi hoga. th-cam.com/video/FuFcR7NPqVo/w-d-xo.html
@@smitaswarup8562 Accept it, if you don't have right answers/arguments for my facts. We did mistakes, we thought forgiveness and peace come together but Mughals proves us wrong, impotent leaders are dangerous- we learned this. Now we are a reflection to others, if anyone wants friendship we become true friends eg. Russia, Israel, Japan, etc. if you want to fight we will fight. Hindutva is not a word, the ideology is "Sanatan" :- way of living life. "Hindu" used by Mughals for Bharatiya, we all are Hindu/Bharatiya or English says Indian. We have the capability to Change or accept, Mughals try to convert but get merged, Christians try to convert us they also get merged in Sanatan. We want to live in peace and prosperity but if you try to attacks us, try to interfere, or any type of anti national agenda- not acceptable. Yes we will retaliate and you have to face consequences.
Watching it late but loved swami’s factual answers. He seems so accurate.
It will be a crime to not see him as a minister again..
oh please God, give this man long health and life and make him a finance minister and then PM
Secularism means vasutheva kutumbakam = Hinduism
This man is such an inspiration.☺️☺️☺️ He is amazing
Swamyji OMG india is blessed to have you. Great Human. Love you 😍😍😍😍😍😍
exactly..equal laws for equals. don't measure hunter and hunted using the same yardstick
Equal protection of law 👌
👍 exactly...
God please add 30 more years to his life. We need swamy ji!!
I belong to Schedule caste ..I support to remove all the reservations.. Let everyone get jobs and college seats based on the skills..
Reservation is not about anything else, but representation. Every group should be in there any institution or government departments. So that they can understand you better. Think of honour killing, that is nothing to do with honour. Who is always affected, why there is denial of justice. no strict laws against it. why? think.... equal representation is not there...
🙏👍
@@tamilselvi1461 but without merit? Even after 40 years begging for quota? Incapable idiots
@@indiatas without merits? On what basis EWS group is getting reservations ? They only said others are on reservation, so the quality is going down. Now when they (OC) get it, quality will be maintained ? SX reservation is a reparation
Stop conversion by misionery
By converting to another faith the individual escapes from the clutches of casteism.
Before condemning conversions people should understand why it is so easy for an individual to switch faiths.
If tripple talaq is bad then casteism is worse.
There no castism in NE india jst deluded by misionery If u convert becum minority wat d use to accept white supremacy who wil protect indegene religion of india dats simple xcuse to justify.Wat about black wil they convert again atrocities done by whites dnt justify
@@Supervisor-entertainment At least there are Christians like you , who speak against the missionaries . Thanks for the support . We need to force the government to apply Uniform Civil Code for everyone , no privileges based on religion whatsoever!!.
10 years jail for Religion conversion
@@shekarroy6892 why ?
Thanks to Arth for organising this beautiful talk.
Overall I am happy. Modi sir is doing great job. Swamy plus Amit sir in addition is great.
Do we have egos as usual . hope our strong present developments are not hurt.
Any which wau. Cudos to you all. May God.s blessings prevail at all times.
great personality, I don't have words how amaze I am to hear your replies and opinions. just awasome!!!!
Modi listens to this man and still doesnt tell him.anything rather listens to him . To all those who thinks Modi doeant tolerate his critics . Swamy Criticizes Modi based on facts and never does it score any political mileage win election being from same party . ITS A RAW TRUTH THAT MODI HIMSELF BROUGHT SWAMY TO BJP .
Swamy sir and Anurag sir .....both legends in their respective field.
Swamy ji has more views than all channel combined
Bravo to Mamata who has single handedly fought the communists who have broke the back bone of Bengal and destroyed it. Somehow, Modi and Mamta should get together, they should put aside politics and work together to take Bengal to the next level.
Didi is no less than communists, she has also ruined Bengal, I don't see any great improvements being made to the state since she came into power, but rampant goondaism increased.
Salute to swamyji
Everyone should support ucc we want uniform civil code
Jagan Reddy being Christian didn't sign consent form before entering temple. He entered temple by wearing chappals. His father tried to give three hills of Lord venkateswara to Christian missionaries.
Sir May god send millions and millions like you . Sir
I much love and respect for you.
This man should be the PM of India. . . 😍. . We respect you Swamy
My de facto guru, Dr Swamy. My knowledge just got increased once I started following him.
Our dear Nation requires more number of people like Dr. Subramaian Swamy. Long live Sir. You are our ideal. You are our role model.
Swamy ji knows almost all articles.... great intellect sir 🙏🏻
I hope Mr Subramanian Swamy lives for at least 15 more years. Respect!!!
We, need a people like Dr. Swami.....
This Swamyji is a walking talking constitution bible of our dear mother India. Its for this and many other reasons he is regarded a very well articulated student who is very free and fair. Many opposition politicians distance themselves from getting involved with him in any debate, fear of getting exposed. Swamyji is our one man army, may he be blessed with good health and a long long life.
Not Bible say Gita
@@chandrait2004 Ok
Chatarpati Sivaji Maharaj ki Jai
we are prosecuting Arundhati..thats due process. thats awesome....love it
Islam: my way or highway that too in separate ways😁 that really cracked me up🤣🤣🤣
Secularism...?
Aak thu.
Hey, what happened?
Kuch nhi happened...bachi paan thuki 🤣🤣🤣
@@dudeitsme5753 😂🤣😂🤣
Liberandus will start liking it
@@dudeitsme5753. Haha 😹
BJP's next Ace of Spade Subramanyam Swami... for next election...
0:00 suggests...👍🤔
As usual, learned a lot from u sir. 🙏🙏... Bonus is, good to know "Mamta Di" is not as, we have been thought so far, in her personal life.
🙏🙏
Every time I lose hope in this man he turns round and restores my faith...
Swamy Ji, Modi’s greatness and success is not his super intelligence , your success is your intelligence. His is his sincerity, love of his country and culture. His deep faith and greatness of character! So nobody can be a better PM than him.
Truth ;by Shri.Dr.Swamy ,always truth .👍👏🌏🙏👍.
Subramaniam Swamy for PM 2024 !!!!! This guy is a genius.
Majestic words and glory of this man my ideal glad to see you sir in Kolkata
Love This Guy!! This is the calibre of Politicians we want in the Country!!
Mr Swamy is one of great tamilian 😇
He is Aryan I guess
@@hat_awesome21 Aryan? As in nobleman?
Atal Jii --- The KING
Modi-- An artist
Subramanyam Swami- THE MAN
This Government must bring in is Universal Civil Code immediately.
Uniform civil code i think is what u tryna say
@@shubham3vedi Yes my mistake actually it should be Uniform Civil Code Law. Let Uniform Civil Code act pass the Lok Sabha immediately.
“ there should be no adjustments made in the constitution” woah 🤩
Mr Swami !!! It’s always enriching, mesmerizing and exciting listening to you. Not just it is factual, but straight forward and witty at the same time. Huge respect to you sir. Wish to see you as our finance minister ❤️
Dr Swamy always speaks the truth. The maverick. But his hate for Christianity and islam will never fade.
This host who introduced the panel needs to recheck where he is at !
My parents lost everything in partition. My grandfather was murdered. A good Muslim advocate, a friend of my grandfather, took the women to their airport for three days at great danger to himself till they got on the plane to Delhi in burkhas and with all their valuables. My great grandfather, my other grandparents, my parents and my aunts and uncles, never harbored hate despite all the trauma of partition. They never brought us up with hate. They were proud of their sacrifices for the nation. Please listen to the words (IN VIDEOS, LINKS AT BOTTOM OF THIS NOTE) of my father, Prof Shanti Swarup, 96, freedom fighter who passed away in March 2020 on Secularism 101--Various good people are muddying the waters about secularism. In my humble view, conceptually and in very simple terms, secularism was something consciously adopted and accepted by people who were tired of civil war and killing each other. It is why Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, Ambedkar, Maulana Azad pursued it for India even if it was formally added into the constitution later. It is the same with the concept of democracy, and the concepts of liberty, fraternity, equality. The whole idea of a constitution. Secularism was never something, anywhere in the world, that people developed or accepted spontaneously. People accepted it because they were tired of hate and wanted to improve their lives and live in peace. People various religions practice their religions privately. In a new democracy, secularism is supposed to be superimposed on various religious groups so they can live together peacefully within one territory and pursue other objectives such as healthcare, food, education, competing with other powers like China. Why are people in India going down the rabid path of looking for cultural causes of the failure of secularism--this is only going to muddy the water further so we make things worse, not better. We have to create a common vision for India together. Yes, reversing Shah Bano judgment was a big mistake for which we have been paying a heavy, heavy price. But we need to move on towards a more perfect union. This why USA, UK, Australia, etc have pursued secularism and they are also trying to move towards a more perfect union. It is why India chose secularism and we must continue to pursue a more perfect union. It is the crux of the point that my father, Professor Shanti Swarup, was covering in his videos here.
Please do give a few minutes of your time to review the issue of secularism, specifically in the videos. Thank you. Dhanyawad. Shukriya, bahut meherbani. Bari merbani.
th-cam.com/video/PRR9EPNUUJw/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/OMjEzJ1JgZ0/w-d-xo.html
Long live Dr Subramanian Swamy for the next 1000 years Love and Respect you the most
Long live swami ji ❤
The best thing he said...only a gyani and a tygi is a Brahmin...
Rest just enjoying the previledge
Love & respect to swamy ji
Anuragji was so polite and articulate with his questions and swamiji as usual crisp and crystal clear answers
Dr Swamy is a very practical man with utmost commonsense, equally fearless & courageous enough to stand by his convictions. we need thousands of such geniuses to bring this great country, realize its innate greatness, shrouded in mystery.
Great scholar and he speaks very clearly..
Dr.subramanya swami ji...🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Swamiji need no introduction. 🙏👏👏👏
Dr Swamy is a real genius of our country. Iam proud of you sir...
#SubramanianSwamiAsFm #SwamiAsFM We want Swami as Finance Minister .............
1st time watching Anurag Saxena. He was very poised and clear throughout the interview. Truly enjoyed it.
And Swamy Sir, I just became ur fan. On the part on chp 4 of BG, awareness on teachings of BG must be spread to Hindus in India. It's quite sad when we meet Hindus from India here, who themselves hardly know much about the things said in BG, but in practice blindly follow a distorted version of BG.
2029 tak Mulko ko apni jaga pe pochaya jayga....
I support all Bill pass by BJP in Rajya Sabha.
Hindu Jag Chuka hai...
Hume Nokri nahi chahiye.. Pehle ye Mullo ka kharcha INDIA se hatana hai..
Jai Shri Ram 🚩
Chutia sanghi...real profile bana lodu
Thanks, Navjot for being sensible
Jai Shri ram paaji
@@pcbpako original nahi hai bhai
Hats off to Mr Swamy! One is yet to be born to debate him ! Absolute intellect hands down
no need secular word
What a man!! Super intellectual. Dr. Swami..
I may not agree his political styles but I do admire his eloquence, intelligence and oratory skills. He is definitely an encyclopedia of India.
Subramanian swamy is my favourite politician. 👍👍👍
I don't even agree Swamy over Owaisi where he is patriotic, no he is patriotic towards his religion ...
That's because you are son of mallik kafur....😂😂
Mallikarjun Mundas Owaiseeee patriot 🤣🤣🤣.
Worth hearing. Beautifully canalised concept. Both anker & presentor needs to be honoured. We are blessed to have nice knowledge sharing. OM shanti.
We Need More Persons Like You. In India. Legend 👏
What a discussion 👌 Really informative & eye opening 🙏
2024 me bhi modi sarkar
Kon se city se ho
@@himdude9637 Mumbai
Agar swamy ji ko finance minister banavo
Yogi
Pagal h kya bhai desh barbad hojayga
What a fascinating discussion.. Great questions and what amazing clarity and knowledge by Mr. Swamy when answering the pointed questions.
Mr.Modi & BJP government is the bravest government for restoring gradually the historical traditions of rights of the Hindus.
Hats off to the Anchor-- Sitting n front of Subramanya Swamy for 1 full hour Still alive is a great achievement
After watching this candid conversion between both the notable personal I feel a great regards towards both of you...specially Young Anurag jee dealing with the Temple case...a great work
Great n direct man Mr Swami. Jai Hind