The Apollo Spacecraft is one of my favorite topics! Thanks everyone for watching and supporting my videos😎 Watch my 3 part series on the Apollo Spacecraft: th-cam.com/video/8dpkmUjJ8xU/w-d-xo.html Learn more cool facts about the Lunar Module that I didn't include in this video: www.patreon.com/posts/finished-video-28251494
Beautiful! And, thank you Jared! My dad helped design the LEM while working at Grumman in Farmingdale NY. He was always so proud of his work there and we were so proud of him too. Miss you daddy!
Please pay attention....! The MIT quote is dated 1966. I very clearly pointed out that the name " LEM " was dropped NASA in 1967, although some sources say that the notice to change the name went out in June 1966...
You should be proud. It might have been the most challenging of all the many design challenges Apollo had to overcome. A manned spacecraft that would takeoff and land only in the vacuum of space, a pure SPACE craft, had never been built and has never been built since. It required a completely unique approach. And the minuscule weight budget they were given made it all the more difficult. But they pulled it off and it landed 6 times and saved the Apollo 13 crew. It was Grumman’s finest engineering achievement.
Grumman was in Bethpage, I know my dad worked there his whole life, I worked there for awhile also. As did my brother. They had a plant out east in Calverton. They needed that plant because the people in Levittown started complaining about the noise when Grumman started making jet fighters like the F9F.
At 11 years old I watched the first Moon landing in the presence of my Grandmother. She was born in 1899 and remembers when the horse and buggy was the most common form of transportation.
@@yafuker6046 When you think about it, that's pretty amazing. To be 17 in 1903, having teenage dreams about life. Who could honestly imagine all those things? The first airplanes, electricity, electric lighting, electric trains, and also Titanic, WW1, radio stations, the Roaring Twenties, depression, WW2, television, commercial flight, colour television, space flight, satellite television,.....moonlandings(!), open heart surgery, personal computers. Not to mention theme parks, SUV's, frozen pizza's, and three coloured toothpaste.
A pleasant surprise! A straightforward, no-nonsense presentation, not dumbed down, nor unnecessarily complicated. Good use of computer graphics. No whiteboards, no obtuse narration. Guess I'm going to find something else to complain about today. Well, the weather IS awfully cold…
You know what cold is? The vacuum of space at -380C. You know what hot is? The thermosphere, which at about 100Km up reaches 2000+C. Guess what all satellites and the silly module were/are made of? Aluminum which has a melting point of 800C covered in mylar sheets that melt at 300C.
@@williamthepleaser1 Quit being silly. I don't see any point you're trying to make. You don't seem to understand what temperatures mean in space, anyway. You think those involved in those missions haven't thought of all that stuff? Quit wasting our time. BTW there is NO SUCH THING as minus 380 C.
I'm afraid, my friend, it's not the video but YOU who have been "Dumbed Down" if you believe Man flew to the Moon in a cardboard box held together with gaffer tape
The Volkswagen was invented by the same country who developed the A4/V2 rocket motor (head designer = Korolev). It's telling that the F-1 main engines in the SaturnV were of considerably inferior design to the V2 rocket motor. The Germans used a double walled chamber like all rockets do today while Rocketdyne were still brazing thousands of tiny tubes together. Nothing about the SaturnV was particular advanced which is why NASA scrapped it as soon as the Apollo series of novels were finished.
Graham NASA wouldn’t want to use a German engine. In the Cold War the United States would probably want to build their own engine to show the Soviets their capabilities.
@@owensharp4891 Yet NASA were quite happy putting Von Braun - a well known and not particularly nice nazi in charge. Also the F-1 showed no capabilities, it was a dreadful design last proposed in 1962 and never used again. Ever.
Von Braun was the best rocket scientist NASA had at the time. I’m not saying he was a good person, just saying he was the best at designing rockets at the time.
@@guywithahoodie7859 I watched them live too. I was 10 years old. My father took me outside to look at the moon and said: "son think about it, two men touched the surface an hour ago, you'll remember this day, and this conversation and tell your grandchildren about this moment". In my mind I was thinking my 47 year old father was really old. I'm 61 now, and it seems like yesterday. He's left this world 10 years ago... God rest his soul. Life moves on moments are fleeting...
That tiny detail about how the lunar rover folded out explained so much! You have no idea how many hours I've spent looking at diagrams of that thing for two seconds of animation to make it look totally obvious.
I'm really exited for the new Artemis program and Musks plans with the starships. I think that Nasa, Space x and other international space agencies can achieve great Milestones like apollo and soyuz did during the space race
One of the most - maybe the most - ingenious vehicles ever designed. Almost hard to believe that decades have passed since it carried people to the moon.
I watched another documentary on the LEM. In a nutshell shell, it looks the way it does because they had to keep reworking it bit by bit to get the weight down, leaving just enough to have a functional machine. It didn’t need to look pretty or like something from Buck Rogers, it had to work. So many intelligent hard working people put their soul into the Apollo program, what a great achievement.
It really does look crude close up because the covers over the various tanks are all wrinkly because they are paper thin, basically there to keep dust put and nothing more (not part of the pressure vessel) and weight was their constant enemy.
they lied and took an oath of secrecy . taking minds off the vietnam atrocities of stealing gold and oil van allen radiation belts keep space travel impossible .you tube 4409 did we go to the moon in a soup can .ΑΩ
A stunning American achievement! The engineering, the computing, the mathematics, the manufacturing, the communications, the electronics - outstanding.
A key, unsung, aspect of Apollo's success was NASA's management. They had incredibly competent administrators, James Webb (the recent telescope namesake) is just one example.
I watched the landing in my elementary school class. We just watched TV the whole time as history was being made. Great video! This is TH-cam at its best!
@Terry Winter Do flat earthers like you really exist? We are not riding on the back of a giant turtle. You can buy a $50 telescope and see the equipment we left on the moon. Wait, maybe they painted that equipment on the end of the telescope.
@Terry Winter Sure, if the letters are a 2-3 feet tall and the plate is affixed to the roof! "but so far nothing, so why is that ?" literally 10 seconds later with Google: "Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera wiki entry LROC has flown several times over the historic Apollo lunar landing sites at 50 km (31 mi) altitude; with the camera's high resolution, the Lunar Roving Vehicles and Lunar Module descent stages and their respective shadows are clearly visible, along with other equipment previously left on the Moon. It is expected that this photography will boost public acknowledgement of the validity of the landings, and further discredit Apollo conspiracy theories." Typical lazy conspiratards expect everyone else to do the work for them.
@Terry Winter Well you obviously didn't understand your own link! It was pretty clear in my reply that at least I know what the Nyquist limit is (evidently it went over your head, literally :)
Yes, excellent work. There’s also this video by Kevin Hughes that focuses on the docking probe. He has another that does an excellent job of detailing the issues with it during the docking attempts with Apollo 14. m.th-cam.com/video/4drYZcMY9jU/w-d-xo.html
Teaching you how easy it is to fool the world with CGI and green screens. Never heard of the freedom of information act what it says about our planet? You're too easily led, is the trouble.
Thanks! You showed the design well. As a kid in 1969 my friend “Hank” and I had plastic models of the Saturn rocket. As the Moon Mission progressed start to finish, from launch to recovery, we duplicated every step with our models... Rocket stages separated, CM pulled LM out, separated, LM landed, returned safely to Earth,...every action simulated as we watched our TV sets. I recently visited Huntsville AL., and saw the Enormous Saturn V rocket standing erect at the NASA museum at the Redstone Arsenal... OMG! I was so stunned. And proud.
@@owensharp4891 True, so their immediate scrapping of the F-1 shows us again that it didn't take them to the moon. In the 1980s NASA finished the Shuttle SRB, a far far better engine, just three SRBs give 9m lbf, 20% more than claimed for the F-1 based Saturn V first stage.
@@owensharp4891 V-1? You mean the F-1, a 1962 design that NASA ditched as soon as possible. If it was good why did they ditch it? Look at the tubular design, it was always rubbish - they ditched it because it didn't work very well. The point about the SRBs is that in the 1980s NASA again had all the equipment they needed to visit the moon with ease. I.e. they lost nothing but their excuses for never 'returning'.
It was also an add on that wasn't originally supposed to go on the mission. That's why they had to mount it outside on the ladder as the LM had already been closed up and loaded into the Saturn V.
Perfect! I am a docent at The Cradle of Aviation Museum and we have the Apollo 19 LEM. This video is an easy to understand presentation of our magnificent bird. Thanks Jared!
I’m heading your way! I’m in Connecticut and see you’re close on the map. 7:05 I’ve seen Jared’s videos multiple times; they’re so good it’s worth multiple re-watches.
I saw one of the LM's at the NASM in DC. We passed it the first time and I thought it was a high school mock up. When we returned to that area I was hanging out by it while my wife was off doing something. I was AMAZED to learn it was an actual unused LM. I couldn't believe the guys on the earlier missions actually trusted that to get them to and from the moon. Just amazing and so much respect for the team that made the moon landings possible.
everyone involved was very well aware of just how dangerous the mission was. In preparing for a disaster president Nixon had a speech ready that thankfully was not needed. here's a video someone made using the speech th-cam.com/video/LWLadJFI8Pk/w-d-xo.html
@@ranchdressing1037 hey we not only took on the gargantuan challenge of developing this massive rocket and successfully launched it, should we go on and land on the moon? naaaa /s
1:58 The Lunar Module actually played a very very very important role in Apollo 13. After the o2 tank explosion which crippled the command module Odyssey, the astronauts, with no other choice, shut it down and powered up the Lunar Module, Aquarius. They used the LEM oxygen supply to survive, and used its descent engine to get on a free-return trajectory. If this had happened on a mission such as Apollo 8, with no LEM, the crew would have for sure died.
@@Bob-yt9fo The movie is already made....; shot in secret location (and studio) somewhere in a deserted desert...! Besides, NASA has their own computer graphics specialists.
"Artemis", the Greek Goddess of the hunt, wilderness, wild animals, the moon and chastity.....! Ever wondered why space craft, rockets and missions are given mythological names of Roman or Greek gods like Mercury, Apollo, Saturn, Artemis, Dragon etc. etc etc....? What does "Dragon" infer..the "Dragon from the Book of Revelations....???? Ever wondered why planets and celestial bodies are given names like Mercury, Venus, Mars, Saturn, Neptune, Jupiter and Pluto etc. Even the new discoveries like "Ceres" and the moons of planets like Ganymede, Titan, Europa, Oberon, Miranda etc. Even names of demons like Phobos and Deimos and the names of asteroids like Apophis....!? Why do they give names of mythological gods to things which God has created.....; even names of demons..!? Why do the glorify human endeavors and achievements with names of gods and demons...? What are we getting into when we get into "space travel" and believe in "moon landings"...? What are we worshipping when we glorify "space travel" ...? Why "Artemis"...; was it inspired by the movie (or book) "Artemis Fowl" at all...? What are the goals of scientist really with "space travel" and "studying the origins and composition of the universe...? What are they really looking for and what are they really trying to achieve...(Besides "dispelling the myth of God")?? What are they really up to at Cern with their "particle accelerator" (besides looking for the "god particle"..).???? Are they really trying to open a portal to another dimension,(maybe a spiritual one) and making contact with "creatures" from beyond..? What will happen if they succeed in their scientific endeavor....; will they unleash the "Dragon" from the underworld that we read of in the Book of Revelations...?
Have you seen the actual images of the supposed 'lunar' lander? It looks like it was made in a highschool art project. The fact is the apollo missions never went to the moon, the evidence proving this is beyond doubt and the official story and pseudo science of it is laughable.
Liar. Mr NASA fúckstick talking shit again using Another of his multitude of aliases he uses to write his many troll posts on every fe video he can find and every other video exposing the lies and telling us the truth
My dad and uncle, Eric and Harry Petersen worked at the Space Sciences Laboratory in Berkeley as machinists. The made a bunch of those reflectors. All so Mariner Mars and Viking stuff.
Not one mention at all about the Oxygen the guys have to breath, but we all know they were never there so it was unnecessary to equip. they just sent equipment up with no men inside.
This is great because I was always fascinated by the LM. I wonder if the engineers knew they were giving this thing a face, or if this just happened by itself. Because it definitely has a face.
Wow... Pranav Desai And when you were a little boy Regarding astronauts, did your mom make you a pretend space suite, and a cardboard luner lander, did you pretend to be on the moon too? Did she get any pictures to prove that you were pretending to be on the moon, like nasa presented to the world nearly fifty years ago? Have you got any jokes about pigs flying over white houses? #WWJD #usaFAGGOTS #ENDOFDAYS #nasaFAGS
@Limey Lemon The fact that someone "believes" something doesn't make it true. You are fucking stupid. A belief is only a guess, not a fact. Where is your spinning Ballshit model evidence.. You don't have any, you don't have any. Hardy Hardy har har.. We get to laugh at you and mock you.. Bwaahhaahhhaahhaa..
@Limey Lemon It isn't what we want dipstick, it is reality. Something you are shit scared of so you live in a fantasy world where you think that you live on a spinning ball in the middle of space. Hahahaa. And you also believe in that big bang bullshit. The day when for no reason, nothing decided to explode in the middle of nothing and put of nothing everything just magically appeared.. Bwaahhaahhhaahhaa.
@Limey Lemon when more people believe in THE FLAT EARTH, than the spinning Ballshit model, will it then be correct,simply because more people believe in it?
Teen Conservative Good for you, don't let anyone stop you, my uncle worked for Boeing at the Cape and when I was a kid in the 70's he was like a rock star to me.
@@lancer525 I've been an engineer for over 30 years, and had to study a lot of science to do so. I've been conservative even longer than that. Your assumptions are incorrect.
The fuels for the LM was a hyperbolic type, which when combined cause a superheated steam jet. The 'fuel' was aerozine a highly corrosive liquid. The oxidizer was nitrous oxide N2O4. When combined there was an explosive reaction. My dad was an electrical engineer at Grumman. He was involved with the LM project, when I was 10 years old he brought me into plant 5 to see the high bay white room with almost all of the LM 's in a row. LM 1 was already tested at this time on the apollo 5 unmanned mission to test the vehicle in space.
Correct, apollo5 (LM2), had no legs or life support systems, was used only to test decent, ascent, and reaction rockets. Also the test of inertial guidance. LM3 was tested in earth orbit by 2 astronauts. Tested all systems and maneuvering and docking with the Apollo9 capsule. It was not light enough to take the astronauts off the moon. LM4 was light enough to bring the astronauts off the moon but was used in lunar orbit to test the navigation equipment as well as inertial guidance in low gravity.
Very interesting this video but I'd like to add a comment , the LEM might have been built in the U.S.A. but a lot of people don't know that the legs of the lunar module ( LEM ) was created and done by the company HEROUX-DEVTEK in Longueuil (Quebec) Canada and we are proud of that .
Dude, that was amazing. I'm an Apollo era kid & had models of the lunar lander. I loved the way it looked. The lander always filled me with a sense of awe and I always wondered what was inside it! Thanks a lot. Great video.
I had the same experience as kid and built a model LEM. Then around 1979 there was a video game with a black and white screen. The name of the game was Lunar Lander and the object of the the game was to land a LEM On the moon with a set amount of fuel. I would enjoy playing it today.
@@marcgoff7881 I remember that game. I'd play it at the arcade. It was fun because you had to think strategically while looking for a place to put down you also had to pay attention to fuel consumption and speed or the little lander would break up. I enjoyed that game and asteroids. That's where all my quarters went. Lol
@@johnnie2638as I recall you had to use thrust all the way to landing unlike the real LEM that could hover 10 feet above the lunar surface and had it ran out of fuel it still would landed safely and softly. Matter of fact Neil Armstrong would have preferred to cut the engine higher than the 5 feet as planned. They were not sure how far they would sink into the lunar soil and were concerned that if the landing legs pads sank to far in the lunar surface while the engine was running the engine might have contacted the surface and exploded. Everything however worked as designed and the 5 foot long Lunar Surface Sensing Probes alerted the crew with Armstrong announcing “Contact light, Engine stop”. One of the things the Hoax nuts like to point out is there is little blast disturbance in the lunar soil under the engine bell. I had an opportunity to meet Buzz Aldrin and asked asked about it and he said that they were hovering at around 10’ feet and reduced power to basically idle and just settled down on the surface .
Everything about the Apollo missions and how they were achieved is fascinating. I can only imagine what it would have been like, I mean imagine flying to the moon and landing on it and the feeling when you first touch down and then crawl out to walk on it. Mind blowing
@@charleswest6372 ok buddy. There literally hundreds of thousands of people who worked on it and explanations that make sense for how every bit of it worked. If you don’t want to believe that’s up to you but you got the idea it’s fake from something silly but you ignore every bit of proof there is because it’s what you choose to do. Whatever.
Excellent presentation with detailed graphics showing every compartment and its contents. The only thing I've ever known was the intentional goal to produce the Lem with as few moving parts as possible. What incredible engineering.
I read something once that it was nearly abandoned from the design because of weight concerns. Then someone said that there's never be another chance to record mankind's first step onto ground that was not Earth.
The planning of the Apollo missions was so well thought about. And in those days where everything had to be done by hand with very little computing power and no fancy design tools. Those engineers were the greatest.
Slide rule…Slide rule… 8 digit transistor calculator by Sony was all the rage then… Damn Bob Lazar for bringing element 115 into Molder and Scully’s X-Files…
@@aemrt5745 HAL-9000... HAL-9000... Bill Gate's soon come out with Windows followed in a close second with Close Encounters of the 3rd kind all the while the Lone Ranger and his deputy Tonto was still Hi O'Silvering it out on America's living room in fuzzy black and white coming in from antennas mounted on a rooftop. Capitano Kirk soon come along to with colour TV that weight as much as the USS Starship Enterprise... I too was sold then...
They never on planned that these phoney props would be found in 2022 which were the mission control instruments for their international fiction production th-cam.com/video/9TQk77U7JAY/w-d-xo.html
Jared I was a long haul truck driver for 45 years one afternoon at a diner at a truck stop i got into a conversation with an older trucker .It was an amazing story .He was the man with his truck that picked up the first lunar module and moved it to the assembly location for launching .
Outstanding ! ? Well, yes ... for the cartoon kids who have not developed how to identify logical fallacies nor developing objective, observable, critical-thinking skills
My father worked on the first LM. His engineering handiwork, as part of the design team, is still sitting on the moon. We watched the entire thing, from launch to splashdown. It was awesome!
Excellent visuals! Well done! My dad - a Radiation Heat-Transfer expert - was an engineer on the LM project, in particular doing thermo-vacuum testing on it, to make sure propellants (or cabin air!) didn’’t freeze up.
A big salute to your dad and the entire team of Apollo project for such a great work. Such a great engineering at that time in 60s. Thanks for the awesome 3D presentation Jared, was looking for the lunar module and found it here with simple explanation.
The LM was an amazing vehicle. Humanity's first true dedicated spacecraft, she never suffered a major failure nor caused a fatality. The Apollo 13 LM, Aquarius, served as the lifeboat to save the astronauts after the command module oxygen tank explosion. As someone from NASA described it, on Apollo 13, the LM's performance "greatly exceeded" its design specifications. The Grumman employees who designed and built them should rightfully be very proud.
@@davidsheckler4450 "You can't prove space" Directly, perhaps not. But I know how big the Earth is, I know the distance to the Moon, and I know the Earth's atmosphere has a pressure gradient. Put those together, and indirectly I know space is a Thing.
Excellent. Thanks for the lesson. The guys that achieved this are some of my heroes. In fact, it may be too small to see, but my profile picture is me shaking hands with Gene Kranz - the man!
@@aemrt5745 - He definitely is. It's so apparent when you meet the guy. One of the questions I had for him was regarding the speech he gave his flight team just before Apollo 11 began it's descent to the moon. (If you're not familiar look it up). I asked if he planned that amazing speech ahead of time or if he just winged it ... "just winged it" he said. I asked one of his flight controllers (Jerry Bostick) who was there that day about it, and he said it was the perfect words and was exactly what they needed. One of the most historic moments in NASA history and he just winged it. And nailed it. That's a badass dude!
You started with ..." 2019 being the 50th anniversary of the first lunar landing.". 50 years! And after Apollo 17, we never went back! Or established a lunar base! No country did! Think how far we have advanced, technologically, in that span of time. Now think how much more advanced we could have been, had we stayed the course, that we started as a species. Excellent video, by the way.
@@thesauciestboss4039 Cept the US is making an actual moonbase and does 90% of space shit compared to britain who had to beg to buy out an American satellite corporation because they cant use EU ones, despite the corporation employing americans only.
Oh neat. The sequence at 4:18 showing the Earth - Moon & back laser bounce is to scale both in size and the time it would take to bounce that signal...
Thanks so much for making this video. My father invented one of the parts that was in the LEM. This video makes it so much easier to explain the LEM to folks born after 1969. Thanks for your great work.
Los que amamos la ingeniería admiramos estas maravillas que aun en 2024 son una obra maestra. Excelentes animaciones, excelente video, excelente contenido. Gracias.
@Michael Lyne You're right - he didn't fly the LM on earth...because it wasn't designed to operate in earth's dense atmosphere. You're referring to the LLRV (lunar landing research vehicle) that he practiced for the lunar landing in and had to abort from during an incident where the attitude thrusters ran out of fuel.
The configuration of the descent and ascent engines is completely different from what I thought, watching the event in real time. Very interesting presentation.
Jared your content is so good and educational I can't even put it into words. If there was a medal for making educational, easy to understand TH-cam videos you would be the recipient!
@@JaredOwen Don't thank me, I am just a consumer. You are a brilliant genius who does a lot of hard work! And I love evry second of your videos. Do you ahev a patreon account?
Once again, beautiful animation and explanation!! It's like Christmas seeing all these Moon videos from my favorite TH-camrs :D And what a treat this one was. Thanks, and amazing work!
I followed the moon missions since I was a kid in the mid 60s I was 12 at that time and still research it and so forth build models i never knew what the LM all consisted of I do now thanks a million.
Liar. Mr NASA fúckstick talking shit again using Another of his multitude of aliases he uses to write his many troll posts on every fe video he can find. Loser
Stowed with a pulley system designed and tested for 1g (earth gravity). It's actual weight on the moon in 1/6g would be a two man lift at 17.5kg each: so why the winch? Additionally no note is made of the need for balance on a 16ton craft balancing on a single descent motor.
@@G-ra-ha-m it would be like having 2 people sitting on a pogo stick trying to stay upright. Impossible without huge amount of practice. Even then it will still be nearly impossible.
Thanks mate. Just amazing. Liked the detailed presentation and shows the effort you have spent in making this vid for us to know the details. Keep it up.
I learned people watch cartoons and believe it represents reality...if they see it on TV,even cartoons,they believe it..the lunar module is a joke. It looks like s homeless tweeker shelter and never successfully flew a test flight but they sent it to the moon anyway??? Stop believing in Santa clause, easter bunny and moon missions,they are cartoons not reality..
The ascent stages of the Apollo 9 LEM (Spider) and the whole Apollo 13 LEM (Aquarius) burned up in earth's atmosphere. The ascent stage of the Apollo 10 LEM (Snoopy) was jettisoned into a heliocentric orbit. In June 2019, an astronomer announced that they had located it. All of the other LEM ascent stages launched were deliberately crashed into the moon. The sound waves of their impacts were recorded by instruments left on the moon. This was done to get a better understanding of the geology of the moon.
Another great video Jared. One thing I should mention is the reason why only 3 of the legs had the contact probes. Originally, all 4 had them but at some point, they felt the one were the ladder was also attached might become a tripping hazard depending on the way it ended up after the landing. They figured the best solution was simply to eliminate it altogether. Keep up the great work!
@@christsrevenge8030 is that tthe best you can do troll Because you cannot answer the questions, loser. For coming here with NO EVIDENCE or explanation for that idiotic Ballshit model you are trying to push onto people. It is totally debunked because we watch the sunset facing west. That isn't possible on you idiotic Ballshit model. It works perfectly on THE FLAT EARTH. Had Many people thank me for that information. You lose.. Again and again and etc etc.
steve wittwer. Haa! All your exact same troll comments are accusing others exactly of what you are and your actions. You are one pathetic, foul, deceiving, hypocrite. A filthy, stinking, snake.
مركبة LM القمريه كانت معجزه هندسية وعبقرية علميه مكنت الانسان من الهبوط والعوده الآمنه على سطح القمر . تحياتى لكل العاملين بوكالة الطيران والفضاء الامريكيه ناسا .
Thank you for your excellent animation of the LM! I had just turned 11 when Apollo 11 made its historic mission, and we watched every broadcast that NASA offered to the networks. I later purchased and built the Revelle 1/144 scale Saturn V with all stages and components removable, including the LM. I then built the LM model itself complete with gold mylar descent stage covering! However, the interior was not a finished feature and I had always wondered exactly how the cockpit looked and what was in all the compartments. Again, thank you for fulfilling a decades long wish! You're very talented Jared. Keep up the great work!
Yes, his work is amazing. There’s another guy by the name of Kevin Hughes who did 2 fantastic videos about the probe and drogue system used for docking. Highly recommended.
I've watched a bunch of your videos but had somehow missed this one! A few other tidbits worth noting: - The descent stage rocket was the world's first throttle-able rocket - it could be turned up or down in power, whereas most rockets are all or nothing (hence the importance of timing the burns exactly). This was necessary for making the landing work. - The ascent stage rocket by contrast was designed to be as simple as possible, so there was almost no chance of it failing and stranding the astronauts on the moon. Two chemicals that when mixed (via a simple valve) ignite of their own volition, no separate ignition system needed. - There are no seats in the decent stage - to save weight. The astronauts piloted it down standing up.
"the world's first throttle-able rocket" Weeeelllll, kinda. The first one of any size anyway. The flying rocket-belt ("jet pack" misnamed) comes to mind. It was a rocket with a throttle, and came years before the lunar lander. There may have been more little ones earlier than that (not sure). But, yeah, I'm just being a nitpick.
The Apollo Spacecraft is one of my favorite topics! Thanks everyone for watching and supporting my videos😎
Watch my 3 part series on the Apollo Spacecraft: th-cam.com/video/8dpkmUjJ8xU/w-d-xo.html
Learn more cool facts about the Lunar Module that I didn't include in this video: www.patreon.com/posts/finished-video-28251494
Jared Owen awesome video man
I love space too
Did you get permission from NASA to monetize their works?
As always..... Your animation is great.. Easy to understand. Thanks jared...
You should look at the bfr
Jared: *Talks about RCS*
People who play Kerbal Space Program: You know i’m somewhat of a scientist myself
dont forget about SFS
@@exus1ai wow that game has branched out a lot
@@Sednas but still yeah
XDDDD
Lumineo dude same
Beautiful! And, thank you Jared! My dad helped design the LEM while working at Grumman in Farmingdale NY. He was always so proud of his work there and we were so proud of him too. Miss you daddy!
Please pay attention....! The MIT quote is dated 1966. I very clearly pointed out that the name " LEM " was dropped NASA in 1967, although some sources say that the notice to change the name went out in June 1966...
You should be proud. It might have been the most challenging of all the many design challenges Apollo had to overcome. A manned spacecraft that would takeoff and land only in the vacuum of space, a pure SPACE craft, had never been built and has never been built since. It required a completely unique approach. And the minuscule weight budget they were given made it all the more difficult. But they pulled it off and it landed 6 times and saved the Apollo 13 crew. It was Grumman’s finest engineering achievement.
....nah just takes 5 years and bingo first try!
Grumman was in Bethpage, I know my dad worked there his whole life, I worked there for awhile also. As did my brother. They had a plant out east in Calverton. They needed that plant because the people in Levittown started complaining about the noise when Grumman started making jet fighters like the F9F.
Yea ee were all proud of pop and Leroy Grumman. @sblack48
At 11 years old I watched the first Moon landing in the presence of my Grandmother. She was born in 1899 and remembers when the horse and buggy was the most common form of transportation.
Same here- mine born in 1886, I was 13. she was 17 when Wright Bros. did their thing and died after the third shuttle flight.
@@yafuker6046 When you think about it, that's pretty amazing. To be 17 in 1903, having teenage dreams about life. Who could honestly imagine all those things? The first airplanes, electricity, electric lighting, electric trains, and also Titanic, WW1, radio stations, the Roaring Twenties, depression, WW2, television, commercial flight, colour television, space flight, satellite television,.....moonlandings(!), open heart surgery, personal computers. Not to mention theme parks, SUV's, frozen pizza's, and three coloured toothpaste.
@Xx Bylizzy xX so she was born in about 1904?
Except for what your grandmother saw, the horse and cart, was real, but what you saw....was faked.
@@neilarmstrongsson795 ??
A pleasant surprise! A straightforward, no-nonsense presentation, not dumbed down, nor unnecessarily complicated. Good use of computer graphics. No whiteboards, no obtuse narration. Guess I'm going to find something else to complain about today. Well, the weather IS awfully cold…
You know what cold is? The vacuum of space at -380C. You know what hot is? The thermosphere, which at about 100Km up reaches 2000+C. Guess what all satellites and the silly module were/are made of? Aluminum which has a melting point of 800C covered in mylar sheets that melt at 300C.
@@williamthepleaser1 Quit being silly. I don't see any point you're trying to make. You don't seem to understand what temperatures mean in space, anyway. You think those involved in those missions haven't thought of all that stuff? Quit wasting our time.
BTW there is NO SUCH THING as minus 380 C.
Hi did a good job 👍
its an old one that has no sponsored ba
I'm afraid, my friend, it's not the video but YOU who have been "Dumbed Down" if you believe Man flew to the Moon in a cardboard box held together with gaffer tape
"It's ugly, but it gets you there..." - Volkswagen
The Volkswagen was invented by the same country who developed the A4/V2 rocket motor (head designer = Korolev). It's telling that the F-1 main engines in the SaturnV were of considerably inferior design to the V2 rocket motor.
The Germans used a double walled chamber like all rockets do today while Rocketdyne were still brazing thousands of tiny tubes together. Nothing about the SaturnV was particular advanced which is why NASA scrapped it as soon as the Apollo series of novels were finished.
Dude. Made me snort milk outta my nose. Thanks for that XD
Graham NASA wouldn’t want to use a German engine. In the Cold War the United States would probably want to build their own engine to show the Soviets their capabilities.
@@owensharp4891 Yet NASA were quite happy putting Von Braun - a well known and not particularly nice nazi in charge.
Also the F-1 showed no capabilities, it was a dreadful design last proposed in 1962 and never used again. Ever.
Von Braun was the best rocket scientist NASA had at the time. I’m not saying he was a good person, just saying he was the best at designing rockets at the time.
Wow, I learned more about the moon landings in your 8 minute video that I did in the last 50 years. Great stuff. Thank you.
I watched them live.
What was it like?
Ken Jackson...lucky you Ken...that would be a most treasured memory.
@@guywithahoodie7859
I watched them live too. I was 10 years old. My father took me outside to look at the moon and said: "son think about it, two men touched the surface an hour ago, you'll remember this day, and this conversation and tell your grandchildren about this moment". In my mind I was thinking my 47 year old father was really old. I'm 61 now, and it seems like yesterday. He's left this world 10 years ago... God rest his soul. Life moves on moments are fleeting...
@@invent5540 thank you for sharing that with us, made me happy !
That tiny detail about how the lunar rover folded out explained so much! You have no idea how many hours I've spent looking at diagrams of that thing for two seconds of animation to make it look totally obvious.
Pretty easy to find video of it being packed and then unpacked on the moon.
Me too
What's even more obvious, at least to those of us who are capable of critical thought, is the fact that no human has ever been on the lunar surface.
@@daryllect6659 Low effort troll. Nobody's stupid enough to believe the moon landings were fake.
@@daryllect6659 why?
If your here in 2023 getting hype about space pop a thumbs up
👍
👍👍👍
👍
I’m getting hyped about the moooooon
I'm really exited for the new Artemis program and Musks plans with the starships. I think that Nasa, Space x and other international space agencies can achieve great Milestones like apollo and soyuz did during the space race
One of the most - maybe the most - ingenious vehicles ever designed. Almost hard to believe that decades have passed since it carried people to the moon.
I watched another documentary on the LEM. In a nutshell shell, it looks the way it does because they had to keep reworking it bit by bit to get the weight down, leaving just enough to have a functional machine. It didn’t need to look pretty or like something from Buck Rogers, it had to work.
So many intelligent hard working people put their soul into the Apollo program, what a great achievement.
@@mplsmark222your description is accurate. The LEM is a shell within a nutshell! Like those Russian dolls that have many layers
It really does look crude close up because the covers over the various tanks are all wrinkly because they are paper thin, basically there to keep dust put and nothing more (not part of the pressure vessel) and weight was their constant enemy.
they lied and took an oath of secrecy . taking minds off the vietnam atrocities of stealing gold and oil van allen radiation belts keep space travel impossible .you tube 4409 did we go to the moon in a soup can .ΑΩ
@@stuffD-fh8vf all of the tanks are outside the pressure vessel.
A stunning American achievement! The engineering, the computing, the mathematics, the manufacturing, the communications, the electronics - outstanding.
A key, unsung, aspect of Apollo's success was NASA's management. They had incredibly competent administrators, James Webb (the recent telescope namesake) is just one example.
Lmao!
@@majorstack7214 There's something wrong with you.
Si cagaron a toda la humanidad desde arriba de un puente 😂😂😂
I watched the landing in my elementary school class. We just watched TV the whole time as history was being made. Great video! This is TH-cam at its best!
@Terry Winter Do flat earthers like you really exist? We are not riding on the back of a giant turtle. You can buy a $50 telescope and see the equipment we left on the moon. Wait, maybe they painted that equipment on the end of the telescope.
@Bilal Khalid stfu ignorant muslim
@Terry Winter Sure, if the letters are a 2-3 feet tall and the plate is affixed to the roof!
"but so far nothing, so why is that ?"
literally 10 seconds later with Google:
"Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera wiki entry
LROC has flown several times over the historic Apollo lunar landing sites at 50 km (31 mi) altitude; with the camera's high resolution, the Lunar Roving Vehicles and Lunar Module descent stages and their respective shadows are clearly visible, along with other equipment previously left on the Moon.
It is expected that this photography will boost public acknowledgement of the validity of the landings, and further discredit Apollo conspiracy theories."
Typical lazy conspiratards expect everyone else to do the work for them.
@Terry Winter Well you obviously didn't understand your own link!
It was pretty clear in my reply that at least I know what the Nyquist limit is (evidently it went over your head, literally :)
@Terry Winter I thought the anti-vaxxers like you stopped taking their meds :)
This is insanely detailed!!! I greatly appreciate your videos! Thank you so much for teaching millions of people!
Yes, excellent work. There’s also this video by Kevin Hughes that focuses on the docking probe. He has another that does an excellent job of detailing the issues with it during the docking attempts with Apollo 14.
m.th-cam.com/video/4drYZcMY9jU/w-d-xo.html
Apollo was bogus. Never went to the moon in that aluminum crockpot
Teaching you how easy it is to fool the world with CGI and green screens. Never heard of the freedom of information act what it says about our planet? You're too easily led, is the trouble.
Insane is what it is, and insanity what it represents.
Thanks! You showed the design well. As a kid in 1969 my friend “Hank” and I had plastic models of the Saturn rocket. As the Moon Mission progressed start to finish, from launch to recovery, we duplicated every step with our models... Rocket stages separated, CM pulled LM out, separated, LM landed, returned safely to Earth,...every action simulated as we watched our TV sets. I recently visited Huntsville AL., and saw the Enormous Saturn V rocket standing erect at the NASA museum at the Redstone Arsenal... OMG! I was so stunned. And proud.
The SaturnV never worked properly: There's a good reason why the design of the F-1 rocket motor was never used again.
I’m pretty sure if something can take you to the moon, it’s good
@@owensharp4891 True, so their immediate scrapping of the F-1 shows us again that it didn't take them to the moon.
In the 1980s NASA finished the Shuttle SRB, a far far better engine, just three SRBs give 9m lbf, 20% more than claimed for the F-1 based Saturn V first stage.
Graham I understand that, but that is 20 years later! In the 60’s they had the V-1 and in the 80’s they engineered the solid rocket boosters.
@@owensharp4891 V-1? You mean the F-1, a 1962 design that NASA ditched as soon as possible. If it was good why did they ditch it? Look at the tubular design, it was always rubbish - they ditched it because it didn't work very well.
The point about the SRBs is that in the 1980s NASA again had all the equipment they needed to visit the moon with ease. I.e. they lost nothing but their excuses for never 'returning'.
3:00 Fun fact, that flag on Apollo 11 was bought at a sears for only 5 dollars
I know this one That's why they went white
@SnoopyDoo China at that is actually Taiwan.
It was also an add on that wasn't originally supposed to go on the mission. That's why they had to mount it outside on the ladder as the LM had already been closed up and loaded into the Saturn V.
Andre hope your not lying because I'll believe that till I hear different now.
Joe Vignolo
“A flag?” Said the engineer.
“Yeah, you forgot about the flag.”
“There’s no flag in the proposal.”
Apollo 10’s ascent stage is still out there orbiting the sun somewhere.
ascend this!
Wow. Didn't know that. Might build that into a later book if I get the chance.
yes and they think they may of found it not long ago.
Scott L yes your tight. It landed in my neighbor’s yard about 4 years ago
th-cam.com/video/Ra0GAhvp2-g/w-d-xo.html
Perfect! I am a docent at The Cradle of Aviation Museum and we have the Apollo 19 LEM. This video is an easy to understand presentation of our magnificent bird. Thanks Jared!
TELLING YOU WHAT YOU WANTED TO HEAR EH? HOW NICE.
@@MrDaiseymay don’t be an idiot.
That's awesome! Seeing it IRL gives a real appreciation of the machines size. I need to visit Long Island someday!
I’m heading your way! I’m in Connecticut and see you’re close on the map. 7:05 I’ve seen Jared’s videos multiple times; they’re so good it’s worth multiple re-watches.
I saw one of the LM's at the NASM in DC. We passed it the first time and I thought it was a high school mock up. When we returned to that area I was hanging out by it while my wife was off doing something. I was AMAZED to learn it was an actual unused LM. I couldn't believe the guys on the earlier missions actually trusted that to get them to and from the moon. Just amazing and so much respect for the team that made the moon landings possible.
everyone involved was very well aware of just how dangerous the mission was. In preparing for a disaster president Nixon had a speech ready that thankfully was not needed. here's a video someone made using the speech th-cam.com/video/LWLadJFI8Pk/w-d-xo.html
They didn't... I'm sorry.
@@ranchdressing1037 Yes. They did.
@@ranchdressing1037 hey we not only took on the gargantuan challenge of developing this massive rocket and successfully launched it, should we go on and land on the moon? naaaa /s
I also saw one at the MIT museum. My wife thought it was an attraction park kind of thing, and a very fragile one.
Excellent video. A perfect example of designing something solely for the function it had to carry out.
WAR CHILDREN !
"minimalist" engineering. lol. but excellent point! MORE creation should take note.
th-cam.com/video/Ra0GAhvp2-g/w-d-xo.html
The function of the ANIMATION ?
Deception.
@@cocoweepah function of the animation. To show how the lunar module worked.
1:58 The Lunar Module actually played a very very very important role in Apollo 13. After the o2 tank explosion which crippled the command module Odyssey, the astronauts, with no other choice, shut it down and powered up the Lunar Module, Aquarius. They used the LEM oxygen supply to survive, and used its descent engine to get on a free-return trajectory. If this had happened on a mission such as Apollo 8, with no LEM, the crew would have for sure died.
Dem sun.
@Jared Owen Pin this comment it's a very interesting info tho
bahahaha thinking that this tin foil paper machet consturct did anything at all.
hilarious
@@thevlaka what?
The Lunar Module actually played a very very very important role in Nasa's FAKED moon landing. We never went bro.
this is fascinating! Thanks-glad I found your site! A little old lady now who once thrilled watching this on the grainy tv and wished.
🧡💘
In a few years, you'll be doing a video on Artemis.
4 years to be precise
Abhay Yadav yes
@@Bob-yt9fo The movie is already made....; shot in secret location (and studio) somewhere in a deserted desert...!
Besides, NASA has their own computer graphics specialists.
"Artemis", the Greek Goddess of the hunt, wilderness, wild animals, the moon and chastity.....!
Ever wondered why space craft, rockets and missions are given mythological names of Roman or Greek gods like Mercury, Apollo, Saturn, Artemis, Dragon etc. etc etc....?
What does "Dragon" infer..the "Dragon from the Book of Revelations....????
Ever wondered why planets and celestial bodies are given names like Mercury, Venus, Mars, Saturn, Neptune, Jupiter and Pluto etc. Even the new discoveries like "Ceres" and the moons of planets like Ganymede, Titan, Europa, Oberon, Miranda etc. Even names of demons like Phobos and Deimos and the names of asteroids like Apophis....!?
Why do they give names of mythological gods to things which God has created.....; even names of demons..!?
Why do the glorify human endeavors and achievements with names of gods and demons...?
What are we getting into when we get into "space travel" and believe in "moon landings"...?
What are we worshipping when we glorify "space travel" ...?
Why "Artemis"...; was it inspired by the movie (or book) "Artemis Fowl" at all...?
What are the goals of scientist really with "space travel" and "studying the origins and composition of the universe...? What are they really looking for and what are they really trying to achieve...(Besides "dispelling the myth of God")??
What are they really up to at Cern with their "particle accelerator" (besides looking for the "god particle"..).????
Are they really trying to open a portal to another dimension,(maybe a spiritual one) and making contact with "creatures" from beyond..? What will happen if they succeed in their scientific endeavor....; will they unleash the "Dragon" from the underworld that we read of in the Book of Revelations...?
@@danielcoetzee5793 I don't know what the hell you're on about but I get the feeling it may be drug induced
Not gonna lie that lander looks epic
th-cam.com/video/Ra0GAhvp2-g/w-d-xo.html
where does that link go...
Compared to an elementary school recital set?
Have you seen the actual images of the supposed 'lunar' lander? It looks like it was made in a highschool art project. The fact is the apollo missions never went to the moon, the evidence proving this is beyond doubt and the official story and pseudo science of it is laughable.
@@EricBlair-jg2ux *where brain*
I was an engineer on the Apollo launch team at Kennedy; VERY well done!
Of course you were..
@@nigelwilliams9307 meaning?
@@nigelwilliams9307 Right! he probably watched the launch on lsd and thought he was an astronaut 😂
One of the greatest engineering marvels in history!
Yes. Not sure if you’ve ever read Tom Kelly’s book? He did a fantastic job describing all the hurdles they had to overcome.
I watched on TV the first moon landing. Now I know more about how it happened. Thank you.
Rock and roll buddy! Me too, it was my birthday, turned 10, Olympia WA. Shaped my entire life. I even named my dog Apollo.
@@scottl5000 liar. Mr NASA fúckstick talking shit again using Another of his multitude of aliases
Liar. Mr NASA fúckstick talking shit again using Another of his multitude of aliases he uses to write his many troll posts on every fe video he can find and every other video exposing the lies and telling us the truth
Boomer report !!
@@stevewittwer7444 HOLY SHIT thats boomer as FUCK
My dad and uncle, Eric and Harry Petersen worked at the Space Sciences Laboratory in Berkeley as machinists. The made a bunch of those reflectors. All so Mariner Mars and Viking stuff.
This has got to be one of the BEST videos I have EVER SEEN on TH-cam. ,,,,, WELL DONE!!!
You have got to be kidding...do people believe cartoons are real? If it was reality they would show reality,not cartoons...people are so gullible..
best video ever hahahahahahah what a loser you are
Not one mention at all about the Oxygen the guys have to breath, but we all know they were never there so it was unnecessary to equip. they just sent equipment up with no men inside.
@@tonymiller6890 So you didn't watch the video at all before posting.
@@Pygar2why yes I did .?
This is great because I was always fascinated by the LM. I wonder if the engineers knew they were giving this thing a face, or if this just happened by itself. Because it definitely has a face.
Wow! This is almost like as if I was an astronaut being explained about landing module.
Great Stuff mate!
Pranav Desai lunar*
Wow... Pranav Desai
And when you were a little boy
Regarding astronauts, did your mom make you a pretend space suite, and a cardboard luner lander, did you pretend to be on the moon too? Did she get any pictures to prove that you were pretending to be on the moon, like nasa presented to the world nearly fifty years ago? Have you got any jokes about pigs flying over white houses?
#WWJD #usaFAGGOTS
#ENDOFDAYS #nasaFAGS
th-cam.com/video/HDJBZENPKKc/w-d-xo.html
@Adi Adiani Troll and troll and troll. You’ve impressed no one.
@Cam hahahagahahahahahsggafywua
Hilarious. You don’t sound like a deranged lunatic. Find yourself a hole in the ground and don’t resurface.
I thought I knew a lot about the LM but you've taught me something new. Thumbs up so hard it hurts.
It's all BS. Please wake up.
Praising yourself fúckstick. Cannot find any real people to support you so you invent aliases to praise you.
@Limey Lemon The fact that someone "believes" something doesn't make it true. You are fucking stupid. A belief is only a guess, not a fact. Where is your spinning Ballshit model evidence.. You don't have any, you don't have any. Hardy Hardy har har.. We get to laugh at you and mock you.. Bwaahhaahhhaahhaa..
@Limey Lemon It isn't what we want dipstick, it is reality. Something you are shit scared of so you live in a fantasy world where you think that you live on a spinning ball in the middle of space. Hahahaa. And you also believe in that big bang bullshit. The day when for no reason, nothing decided to explode in the middle of nothing and put of nothing everything just magically appeared.. Bwaahhaahhhaahhaa.
@Limey Lemon when more people believe in THE FLAT EARTH, than the spinning Ballshit model, will it then be correct,simply because more people believe in it?
My grandfather worked on this at Grumman on Long Island, and I’m working to become an aerospace engineer and pilot as well!
You're likely going to find that being "conservative" and studying science are incompatible.
@@lancer525 not true at all.
Teen Conservative
Good for you, don't let anyone stop you, my uncle worked for Boeing at the Cape and when I was a kid in the 70's he was like a rock star to me.
@@lancer525 I've been an engineer for over 30 years, and had to study a lot of science to do so. I've been conservative even longer than that. Your assumptions are incorrect.
@OldPlaces Gee, what a nice guy you are...NOT!
The fuels for the LM was a hyperbolic type, which when combined cause a superheated steam jet. The 'fuel' was aerozine a highly corrosive liquid. The oxidizer was nitrous oxide N2O4. When combined there was an explosive reaction. My dad was an electrical engineer at Grumman. He was involved with the LM project, when I was 10 years old he brought me into plant 5 to see the high bay white room with almost all of the LM 's in a row. LM 1 was already tested at this time on the apollo 5 unmanned mission to test the vehicle in space.
Wow. Must have been quite a sight!
The LM flew in space three times on Apollo 5, 9 and 10 before its first landing on the Moon.
Correct, apollo5 (LM2), had no legs or life support systems, was used only to test decent, ascent, and reaction rockets. Also the test of inertial guidance. LM3 was tested in earth orbit by 2 astronauts. Tested all systems and maneuvering and docking with the Apollo9 capsule. It was not light enough to take the astronauts off the moon. LM4 was light enough to bring the astronauts off the moon but was used in lunar orbit to test the navigation equipment as well as inertial guidance in low gravity.
my Dad work on it too. I ended up working there when we built the wings for the shuttle.
By the time you were there, my dad was working at Calverton.
Wonderfull work! Congratulations!!!
Very interesting this video but I'd like to add a comment , the LEM might have been built in the U.S.A. but a lot of people don't know that the legs of the lunar module ( LEM ) was created and done by the company HEROUX-DEVTEK in Longueuil (Quebec) Canada and we are proud of that .
Huh, that's neat!
LOL! Sure they did Frenchie Boy. Go kiss your hero Miss Trudeau!
There were quite a few things in the American Space Program going to the Moon that were from Canada.
and the mirrors (reflectors), left on the Moon, were French ! Salut, les gars !
Also one of the main engineers was a Canadian . He had the design back in the days of the AVRO ARROW.
Jared, this a very very nice, simple and at the time comprehensive animation.
Couldn't agree more! It was great!
That was dang cool. Very well done.
Nice, simple, piecemeal description. Good job.
Dude, that was amazing. I'm an Apollo era kid & had models of the lunar lander. I loved the way it looked. The lander always filled me with a sense of awe and I always wondered what was inside it! Thanks a lot. Great video.
I had the same experience as kid and built a model LEM. Then around 1979 there was a video game with a black and white screen. The name of the game was Lunar Lander and the object of the the game was to land a LEM
On the moon with a set amount of fuel. I would enjoy playing it today.
@@marcgoff7881 I remember that game. I'd play it at the arcade. It was fun because you had to think strategically while looking for a place to put down you also had to pay attention to fuel consumption and speed or the little lander would break up. I enjoyed that game and asteroids. That's where all my quarters went. Lol
@@johnnie2638as I recall you had to use thrust all the way to landing unlike the real LEM that could hover 10 feet above the lunar surface and had it ran out of fuel it still would landed safely and softly. Matter of fact Neil Armstrong would have preferred to cut the engine higher than the 5 feet as planned. They were not sure how far they would sink into the lunar soil and were concerned that if the landing legs pads sank to far in the lunar surface while the engine was running the engine might have contacted the surface and exploded. Everything however worked as designed and the 5 foot long Lunar Surface Sensing Probes alerted the crew with Armstrong announcing “Contact light, Engine stop”. One of the things the Hoax nuts like to point out is there is little blast disturbance in the lunar soil under the engine bell. I had an opportunity
to meet Buzz Aldrin and asked asked about it and he said that they were hovering at around 10’ feet and reduced power to basically idle and just settled down on the surface .
Everything about the Apollo missions and how they were achieved is fascinating. I can only imagine what it would have been like, I mean imagine flying to the moon and landing on it and the feeling when you first touch down and then crawl out to walk on it. Mind blowing
They achieved NOTHING! Artemis is first time an earth craft went to moon. Technology in 69 couldn't do it.
@@charleswest6372 ok buddy. There literally hundreds of thousands of people who worked on it and explanations that make sense for how every bit of it worked. If you don’t want to believe that’s up to you but you got the idea it’s fake from something silly but you ignore every bit of proof there is because it’s what you choose to do. Whatever.
@@charleswest6372 🧠n't?
@@charleswest6372 not according to photographs from the Chinese, Japanese and Indian space agencies, and no, they aren't NASA.
@@tarrantwolf "but but but muh conspiracy it's all fake" It's incredible how moon-landing deniers are dense.
Excellent presentation with detailed graphics showing every compartment and its contents. The only thing I've ever known was the intentional
goal to produce the Lem with as few moving parts as possible. What incredible engineering.
It really was an incredible engineering design, especially considering the short timeframe.
well done! never had the exterior camera explained.
I read something once that it was nearly abandoned from the design because of weight concerns. Then someone said that there's never be another chance to record mankind's first step onto ground that was not Earth.
The greatest, coolest flying machine ever built...
I'm using this video to counter arguments online that say "we never went to the moon". We need more educational videos like that.
I'd say not to bother and save yourself some frustration. But I guess we better try
WELL DONE !!! Great work. Simple and clear. Good job,dude !!
The planning of the Apollo missions was so well thought about. And in those days where everything had to be done by hand with very little computing power and no fancy design tools. Those engineers were the greatest.
Slide rule…Slide rule… 8 digit transistor calculator by Sony was all the rage then… Damn Bob Lazar for bringing element 115 into Molder and Scully’s X-Files…
@@aemrt5745
HAL-9000... HAL-9000...
Bill Gate's soon come out with Windows followed in a close second with Close Encounters of the 3rd kind all the while the Lone Ranger and his deputy Tonto was still Hi O'Silvering it out on America's living room in fuzzy black and white coming in from antennas mounted on a rooftop. Capitano Kirk soon come along to with colour TV that weight as much as the USS Starship Enterprise...
I too was sold then...
They never on planned that these phoney props would be found in 2022 which were the mission control instruments for their international fiction production
th-cam.com/video/9TQk77U7JAY/w-d-xo.html
@@edisonone th-cam.com/video/9TQk77U7JAY/w-d-xo.html
@@edisonone th-cam.com/video/9TQk77U7JAY/w-d-xo.html
Fantastic. That's the best and easiest to understand presentation of the LEMs.
Thanks so much
Whomever did this computer animation / rendering did an Excellent job - it looks awesome 👏 Nice job.
Nice 🔨 hammer
the whole time nasa show anything it is computer animation
@@questioneverything8301 nope
@@questioneverything8301
Take. Head. Out. Of. Ass
Jared I was a long haul truck driver for 45 years one afternoon at a diner at a truck stop i got into a conversation with an older trucker .It was an amazing story .He was the man with his truck that picked up the first lunar module and moved it to the assembly location for launching .
Respect for your time on this video creation!
th-cam.com/video/HDJBZENPKKc/w-d-xo.html
jake glenn. Same paste job. Give your mom her phone back little man.
Outstanding presentation! Thank you.
Your welcome!
Outstanding ! ?
Well, yes ... for the cartoon kids who have not developed how to identify logical fallacies nor developing objective, observable, critical-thinking skills
@@cocoweepah what logical fallacies? I can spot one in your comment, however, an ad-hominem fallacy.
I love your channel!
My father in law worked on the Apollo capsule on all the flights, and he kept all of the tools he used to perform that work.
Bravo that man/men - and all the women !
@ G H That's awesome. It must really bother you when you hear somebody you say that the moon landing was faked.
Thanks for this , every people who don't believe in moon landings should watch this , every questions are clearly answered in this video..
I'm glad it was clearly explained. Thanks for watching!
"I thought I knew a lot about the LM but you've taught me something new." - Me too. Fantasic.
You rock dude! Thanks for all this work. I followed the space program from Mercury through Apollo as a kid. This brings it all back.
th-cam.com/video/9TQk77U7JAY/w-d-xo.html
Wonderful. That’s a good amount of information in a short time
Thank You
Jared would you make what's inside airplane jet?
@raCECar the yt channel?
Yes, anti gravity planes are where they film some of the ISS footage in "low earth orbit"...
@raCECar
Chemtrails.
Chemtrails are inside.
2019 and some people still believe in the moon landings
Look at all the paranoid schizophrenics gathered here. Fucking oxygen thieves.
My father worked on the first LM. His engineering handiwork, as part of the design team, is still sitting on the moon. We watched the entire thing, from launch to splashdown. It was awesome!
Relax Doug, we never landed on the moon. NASA FAKED the whole thing
@@123davepreston Moon landing were real. Stop with the conspiracies. All of them are already debunked anyway.
Amazing what did he do?
th-cam.com/video/xNSrdTtOf4I/w-d-xo.htmlsi=2T_v0DIzz_lnw0Pj
Jared, thank you for this detailed illustration. Learnt a lot. 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
After 50 years, finally I knew where they kept the lunar roving vehicle inside the lunar excursion module; Thank you, Jared Owen
Yes I've always wondered that myself!
Eugenio M. Alonso González was that in the ORIGINAL LM plans though?
Same here
I have known it all the time. It was described back Then.
You are fucking stupid to believe that crap. Guliable fool.
Excellent visuals! Well done!
My dad - a Radiation Heat-Transfer expert - was an engineer on the LM project, in particular doing thermo-vacuum testing on it, to make sure propellants (or cabin air!) didn’’t freeze up.
A big salute to your dad and the entire team of Apollo project for such a great work. Such a great engineering at that time in 60s.
Thanks for the awesome 3D presentation Jared, was looking for the lunar module and found it here with simple explanation.
Shrinivas Naik, “thanks,” on my dad’s behalf, and indeed thanks again, Mr. Owen, for the excellent video illustration!
Well done! That really explained the layout of the LEM very well and simply! Thanks!
Couldn't ask for more! It was great!
The LM was an amazing vehicle. Humanity's first true dedicated spacecraft, she never suffered a major failure nor caused a fatality. The Apollo 13 LM, Aquarius, served as the lifeboat to save the astronauts after the command module oxygen tank explosion. As someone from NASA described it, on Apollo 13, the LM's performance "greatly exceeded" its design specifications. The Grumman employees who designed and built them should rightfully be very proud.
Bcs space isn't real so nothing can go wrong Sheeple
@@davidsheckler4450 "Bcs space isn't real so nothing can go wrong Sheeple"
Evidence to follow in 3, 2, 1...
@@maxfan1591 You can't prove space
@@davidsheckler4450 "You can't prove space"
Directly, perhaps not. But I know how big the Earth is, I know the distance to the Moon, and I know the Earth's atmosphere has a pressure gradient. Put those together, and indirectly I know space is a Thing.
@@maxfan1591 Ok...by all means show you went into fake space & took measurements...words mean nothing
Excellent. Thanks for the lesson. The guys that achieved this are some of my heroes. In fact, it may be too small to see, but my profile picture is me shaking hands with Gene Kranz - the man!
"Failure is not an option!"
😀
@@aemrt5745 - He definitely is. It's so apparent when you meet the guy. One of the questions I had for him was regarding the speech he gave his flight team just before Apollo 11 began it's descent to the moon. (If you're not familiar look it up). I asked if he planned that amazing speech ahead of time or if he just winged it ... "just winged it" he said. I asked one of his flight controllers (Jerry Bostick) who was there that day about it, and he said it was the perfect words and was exactly what they needed. One of the most historic moments in NASA history and he just winged it. And nailed it. That's a badass dude!
Nasa: we need to create something to land on the moon
Grumman: i got you fam
I'm a very vistual learner and I love your videos!
Good stuff!👍✌️
You started with ..." 2019 being the 50th anniversary of the first lunar landing.". 50 years! And after Apollo 17, we never went back! Or established a lunar base! No country did! Think how far we have advanced, technologically, in that span of time. Now think how much more advanced we could have been, had we stayed the course, that we started as a species. Excellent video, by the way.
Such a shame we rather participated in war. USA is like the bipolar child of Britain
*cough* Artemis *cough*
@@thesauciestboss4039 Cept the US is making an actual moonbase and does 90% of space shit compared to britain who had to beg to buy out an American satellite corporation because they cant use EU ones, despite the corporation employing americans only.
If only Apollo continued, if only the full STS got approved, if only RL-10s were cheaper...
@@honkhonk8009 The UK cancelled our space programme one day after achieving orbit with a British rocket. Michael Hessltine wreaked it for us all.
Oh neat. The sequence at 4:18 showing the Earth - Moon & back laser bounce is to scale both in size and the time it would take to bounce that signal...
Yes, except for the little pause the laser (in the animation) does when it hits the moon.
Thanks so much for making this video. My father invented one of the parts that was in the LEM. This video makes it so much easier to explain the LEM to folks born after 1969. Thanks for your great work.
Not doubting your fathers achievement, but curious which part. It is kinda cool to know a TH-camr's relative made this or that for the space missions.
a Johnson rod.
th-cam.com/video/HDJBZENPKKc/w-d-xo.html
jake glenn. Game over little man. Give your mommy her phone back
@@christsrevenge8030 👍👍👍
Los que amamos la ingeniería admiramos estas maravillas que aun en 2024 son una obra maestra. Excelentes animaciones, excelente video, excelente contenido. Gracias.
Jared Owen: *talks about Apollo 11*
People who play Spaceflight Simulator and Kerbal Space Program: CHA CHA REAL SMOOTH
@@luznoceda5322 direct ascent or rendezvous?
Without a doubt The most interesting space exploration Video I have ever come across. Thank you so much!
That's a pretty glowing review! TH-cam needs more commentors like you!
As a 3d graphic artist and a long-time fan of the Apollo I find this video seriously good. Well done.
Looks good in animation form. But let's not forget Neil Armstrong never flew it on earth! As it crashed and exploded. What does that tell you?
@Michael Lyne
You're right - he didn't fly the LM on earth...because it wasn't designed to operate in earth's dense atmosphere.
You're referring to the LLRV (lunar landing research vehicle) that he practiced for the lunar landing in and had to abort from during an incident where the attitude thrusters ran out of fuel.
The configuration of the descent and ascent engines is completely different from what I thought, watching the event in real time. Very interesting presentation.
Jared your content is so good and educational I can't even put it into words. If there was a medal for making educational, easy to understand TH-cam videos you would be the recipient!
Wow - thank you for your kind words!0
Wow - thank you for your kind words!
@@JaredOwen Don't thank me, I am just a consumer. You are a brilliant genius who does a lot of hard work! And I love evry second of your videos. Do you ahev a patreon account?
Messaging yourself again fúckstick. Still cannot find any real people to support your nonsense. Lmao. Loser
@@XxKINGatLIFExX messaging yourself again fúckstick. I see that you still cannot find any real people to support you. Funny
Kubrick was such a perfectionist, he had the moon landing shot on location
?!
Yeah and Star Wars, Star Trek and the MC universe are what's real. You're a smuck
Once again, beautiful animation and explanation!! It's like Christmas seeing all these Moon videos from my favorite TH-camrs :D And what a treat this one was. Thanks, and amazing work!
This is one of the best videos I've ever seen on TH-cam. Well done!
I followed the moon missions since I was a kid in the mid 60s I was 12 at that time and still research it and so forth build models i never knew what the LM all consisted of I do now thanks a million.
@6ix 9ine are you FOR real dude come on.
Liar. Mr NASA fúckstick talking shit again using Another of his multitude of aliases he uses to write his many troll posts on every fe video he can find. Loser
I must say i have always LOVED the design of the LM.
th-cam.com/video/Ra0GAhvp2-g/w-d-xo.html
Fun fact: the LM descent stage turned up on one last mission--the telescope mount on Skylab!
@@natureandphysics403 I thought that looked familiar!
Amazing animation. I’ve always wondered where and how the rover was stowed. 👍
Stowed with a pulley system designed and tested for 1g (earth gravity).
It's actual weight on the moon in 1/6g would be a two man lift at 17.5kg each: so why the winch?
Additionally no note is made of the need for balance on a 16ton craft balancing on a single descent motor.
th-cam.com/video/JhvHoWCRuN0/w-d-xo.html
johnny....I always wondered that too. came here to say the same thing
@@G-ra-ha-m it would be like having 2 people sitting on a pogo stick trying to stay upright. Impossible without huge amount of practice. Even then it will still be nearly impossible.
@@stevewittwer7444 now I see why it took them nearly 5 years to train for the mission
Excellent and very informative! Very good work!
Very good fake
I'm very proud to have worked for Northrop Grumman in Bethpage, to have sat in the building where the Lunar Module was designed.
Thanks mate. Just amazing. Liked the detailed presentation and shows the effort you have spent in making this vid for us to know the details. Keep it up.
Thank you!
Hi jared
Excellent animation to learn about lunar module...
Learned a lot...
Thanks for the video....🙏👍😊
I learned people watch cartoons and believe it represents reality...if they see it on TV,even cartoons,they believe it..the lunar module is a joke. It looks like s homeless tweeker shelter and never successfully flew a test flight but they sent it to the moon anyway??? Stop believing in Santa clause, easter bunny and moon missions,they are cartoons not reality..
th-cam.com/video/HDJBZENPKKc/w-d-xo.html
@unarammer So any animation that this channel produces proves whether they’re showing to be fake? Yes or no?
Excellent! A very good animation of that LM.
Another Excellent one from Jared Owen.
The ascent stages of the Apollo 9 LEM (Spider) and the whole Apollo 13 LEM (Aquarius) burned up in earth's atmosphere. The ascent stage of the Apollo 10 LEM (Snoopy) was jettisoned into a heliocentric orbit. In June 2019, an astronomer announced that they had located it. All of the other LEM ascent stages launched were deliberately crashed into the moon. The sound waves of their impacts were recorded by instruments left on the moon. This was done to get a better understanding of the geology of the moon.
Since the moon has no atmosphere, how can sound be carried? Guess I need to do sone homework.
@@johntechwriter The sound traveled through the moon. Rock does transmit sound.
3:40--This answered my question on how they got the Luner Rover into the LM.
Yeah , they just used computer graphics !
It folded and was stored in the descent stage. The astronauts removed it and then pulled a lanyard, and it unfolded,
I know I say this probably 50% of the time, but this is my favorite "What's Inside" video...
I mean... WOW !
Beautifully done video Jerad. You should do one of the various pieces of scientific equipment brought along on the LEMs.
th-cam.com/video/HDJBZENPKKc/w-d-xo.html
jake glenn. Your mom is waiting to beat you bad if you don't give her phone back.
Another great video Jared. One thing I should mention is the reason why only 3 of the legs had the contact probes. Originally, all 4 had them but at some point, they felt the one were the ladder was also attached might become a tripping hazard depending on the way it ended up after the landing. They figured the best solution was simply to eliminate it altogether. Keep up the great work!
Liar. Inventing shit again fúckstick. That's all you do. Invent lies because you have no truths to defend you space lies. Loser.
@@stevewittwer7444 Can you prove him wrong please?
steve wittwer.
@@christsrevenge8030 is that tthe best you can do troll Because you cannot answer the questions, loser. For coming here with NO EVIDENCE or explanation for that idiotic Ballshit model you are trying to push onto people. It is totally debunked because we watch the sunset facing west. That isn't possible on you idiotic Ballshit model. It works perfectly on THE FLAT EARTH. Had Many people thank me for that information. You lose.. Again and again and etc etc.
steve wittwer. Haa! All your exact same troll comments are accusing others exactly of what you are and your actions. You are one pathetic, foul, deceiving, hypocrite. A filthy, stinking, snake.
مركبة LM القمريه
كانت معجزه هندسية وعبقرية علميه
مكنت الانسان من الهبوط والعوده الآمنه على سطح القمر .
تحياتى لكل العاملين بوكالة الطيران والفضاء الامريكيه ناسا .
Thank you for your excellent animation of the LM! I had just turned 11 when Apollo 11 made its historic mission, and we watched every broadcast that NASA offered to the networks. I later purchased and built the Revelle 1/144 scale Saturn V with all stages and components removable, including the LM. I then built the LM model itself complete with gold mylar descent stage covering! However, the interior was not a finished feature and I had always wondered exactly how the cockpit looked and what was in all the compartments. Again, thank you for fulfilling a decades long wish! You're very talented Jared. Keep up the great work!
That's so cool! I'm so glad these videos can help your passion. Thank you for watching!
Yes, his work is amazing. There’s another guy by the name of Kevin Hughes who did 2 fantastic videos about the probe and drogue system used for docking. Highly recommended.
great work with Blender :O) enjoyable videos :O)
I've watched a bunch of your videos but had somehow missed this one! A few other tidbits worth noting:
- The descent stage rocket was the world's first throttle-able rocket - it could be turned up or down in power, whereas most rockets are all or nothing (hence the importance of timing the burns exactly). This was necessary for making the landing work.
- The ascent stage rocket by contrast was designed to be as simple as possible, so there was almost no chance of it failing and stranding the astronauts on the moon. Two chemicals that when mixed (via a simple valve) ignite of their own volition, no separate ignition system needed.
- There are no seats in the decent stage - to save weight. The astronauts piloted it down standing up.
"the world's first throttle-able rocket"
Weeeelllll, kinda. The first one of any size anyway. The flying rocket-belt ("jet pack" misnamed) comes to mind. It was a rocket with a throttle, and came years before the lunar lander. There may have been more little ones earlier than that (not sure). But, yeah, I'm just being a nitpick.
This is the best video which satisfy my curiosity about apollo mission. A big thumbs up for Jared owen
I love your videos. They're awesome!
Thank you!
Just mind blowing how you do these animations. What software do you use? Keep up the good work
Thanks😀 I use blender: www.blender.org
@@JaredOwen WHAT