I always feel sad when Cleo didn't remember to say "50% thermal efficiency was once unattainable, it is a feat of engineering that we thought we can never reach in mass production". It is really, really good efficiency from a combustion engine. The best efficiency motors, like steam turbines that are MASSIVE in size and have several stages to capture all the energy there is can reach 80%. Consumer cars going above 30% is amazing, unthinkable just couple of decades ago. F1 does that with 1.6l engine, smaller than in most passenger cars, and made the engine powerful AND it is also strong, they use 3 engines the whole season. So, extremely efficient, very powerful and long lasting (in terms of racing that is, drop the power delivery in half and they would last several years...). It is not exactly the same as going to the moon but it is a massive feat of engineering in those kind of scales. F1 teams spent billions to get the engine efficiency to those figures.
@@yossal2608 There's no track that they're averaging 200mph on. They generally average around 150mph, give or take a little depending on the track. Monza is the fastest track and in qualifying the best average was 161.4mph.
F1 technically can’t go fully electric until i think 2039 due to some exclusivity agreement Formula E (separate fully electric racing) has but there are plans to be greener F1 usually changes cars/ruleset every few years (about 5 years) and the next change is in 2026. The new rules will allow teams to rely a bit more on the electric side of the current hybrid engines while using 100% sustainable fuel compared to the current 10% Actually the cars aren’t a huge part of the pollution of F1, there was some data and i think logistics was the highest one esp with flights and such.
@ossy6969 I don't think F1 will ever go full electric, hydrogen power will be widely established by the time the Formula E exclusivity agreement expires
Max Verstappen extendid his Championship last weekend in Las Vegas. He is now one of 6 people with 4 (or more) Championships. On the current grid (line up) there are two drivers with 4 or more. Max Verstappen (4) and Lewis Hamilton (7). Together, these twoabsolute LEGENDS share most of the (positive) F1 records available. Ignore the Max and Lewis haters that no doubt will end up in your comments. These two drivers are the cream of the crop. DRS: Yes, that is the thing that... DRS stands for Drag Reduction System.
The current engines are hybrid engines, so part combustion and part electric. They can even use heat energy generated by the brakes to produce more power, as the video explained F1 takes technologies and pushes them to their limits and makes them more efficient. Every few years they make a leap towards making them better and more efficient with new regulations. There is a motorsport that uses electric engines called Formula E, though it isn't as popular.
You know, I’d quite like to see an occasional video from you focusing on Venezuelan stuff and how things compare to other countries. I mean, you’re a great ambassador for your country anyway, but I’d be interested in hearing more from somebody who lives there!
@@Venezuelan_Girl I know i'm very annoying, but look for "Can a regular person drive a real F1 car?" and "Every F1 Team Explained in 14 Minutes". They're great videos. 😃
yes profits a low but when you take a dip look into it teams earn a lot of money, some teams make over a $100 million in Sponsorships and the teams a given prize money for were they finish at the end of the season e.g. Red bull got $140 million in prize money making their total earning over $300 million which is not accounted for on the profits, do yeah they make a shid load of money
WORLD RALLY CHAMPIONSHIP (WRC), at least its Rally1 car category is going zero carbon synthetic fuel from season 2025 and onward. And they are dropping hybrid power.
the person who made the video is a new DTS fan who doesn't really know the diehard f1 fan stuff like F1 not being allowed to be all electric while Formula E exists. Her ending comments about an electric future of F1 just goes to show how surface level all of her understandings are like you'd need a nuclear reactor in the rear to generate enough electricity for a full f1 race because of the high drag and power output of F1 cars and I don't think anybody wants nuclear reactors going 200 kmh around corners
You are right, not Cleo. I mean... of ccurse things have been tried, but not successfully. F1 kinda made all these "ideas" be real inventions what trizle down into car industry. Every modern cars is a cheap symbiosis form a WRC, Dakar, Le Mans and F1 car, only that the inventions are used for the opposite, like keeping the costs low and the efficency and safety high, while having okay speed for the roads.
I always feel sad when Cleo didn't remember to say "50% thermal efficiency was once unattainable, it is a feat of engineering that we thought we can never reach in mass production". It is really, really good efficiency from a combustion engine. The best efficiency motors, like steam turbines that are MASSIVE in size and have several stages to capture all the energy there is can reach 80%. Consumer cars going above 30% is amazing, unthinkable just couple of decades ago. F1 does that with 1.6l engine, smaller than in most passenger cars, and made the engine powerful AND it is also strong, they use 3 engines the whole season. So, extremely efficient, very powerful and long lasting (in terms of racing that is, drop the power delivery in half and they would last several years...).
It is not exactly the same as going to the moon but it is a massive feat of engineering in those kind of scales. F1 teams spent billions to get the engine efficiency to those figures.
The cars reach 200mph, which is 321.8kph, as you were wondering.
faster than that mate looking at 230 ish mph
Last race in Las Vegas Albon’s Williams hits 369 km/h
@AnoesiQ Yes, the cars can reach that speed on the straight, but the average speed of the car during a grand prix is approximately 320kph
@R3ED3R Yeah, that's right, they reach that on the straight. It's referring to the average speed of the car throughout the grand prix.
@@yossal2608 There's no track that they're averaging 200mph on. They generally average around 150mph, give or take a little depending on the track. Monza is the fastest track and in qualifying the best average was 161.4mph.
F1 technically can’t go fully electric until i think 2039 due to some exclusivity agreement Formula E (separate fully electric racing) has but there are plans to be greener
F1 usually changes cars/ruleset every few years (about 5 years) and the next change is in 2026. The new rules will allow teams to rely a bit more on the electric side of the current hybrid engines while using 100% sustainable fuel compared to the current 10%
Actually the cars aren’t a huge part of the pollution of F1, there was some data and i think logistics was the highest one esp with flights and such.
i hope it never does
@@ossy6969
at least we can rely on the fact it won’t happen any time soon
@ossy6969 I don't think F1 will ever go full electric, hydrogen power will be widely established by the time the Formula E exclusivity agreement expires
Max Verstappen extendid his Championship last weekend in Las Vegas. He is now one of 6 people with 4 (or more) Championships. On the current grid (line up) there are two drivers with 4 or more. Max Verstappen (4) and Lewis Hamilton (7). Together, these twoabsolute LEGENDS share most of the (positive) F1 records available. Ignore the Max and Lewis haters that no doubt will end up in your comments. These two drivers are the cream of the crop.
DRS: Yes, that is the thing that...
DRS stands for Drag Reduction System.
You should watch the World Endurance Championship (WEC), with races like the 24 hours of Le Mans
Porsche and Cadillac have great mini documentaries about their teams, not to mention the all access videos from WEC proper!
I recommend watching ricks f1 addiction his video on explaining the teams is very good
Yes!!
Loving these F1 Videos, keep them coming please
Great video! Please react to a Lewis Hamilton video next!
The current engines are hybrid engines, so part combustion and part electric. They can even use heat energy generated by the brakes to produce more power, as the video explained F1 takes technologies and pushes them to their limits and makes them more efficient. Every few years they make a leap towards making them better and more efficient with new regulations. There is a motorsport that uses electric engines called Formula E, though it isn't as popular.
Yeah!! I was waiting for this.
Love your F1 reactions! Would like to see you react to a video called "the entire history of formula 1, I guess"
You know, I’d quite like to see an occasional video from you focusing on Venezuelan stuff and how things compare to other countries. I mean, you’re a great ambassador for your country anyway, but I’d be interested in hearing more from somebody who lives there!
I remember”F1 explained by a idiot”by Rick’s F1 Addiction
Yaas this is the one I was hoping for
there is allready electric cars it is called formula E
yep its just advertising and Ferrari earned over 130 million dollars last year in Sponsorships and tickects range from $500 to $10000
Nice reaction
thanks
@@Venezuelan_Girl I know i'm very annoying, but look for "Can a regular person drive a real F1 car?" and "Every F1 Team Explained in 14 Minutes". They're great videos. 😃
Yeahhhh!!! Please to another Cleo’s F1 video! Is more detailed! F1 cars explained for rookies (with max verstappen)
i reacted to that one also
yes profits a low but when you take a dip look into it teams earn a lot of money, some teams make over a $100 million in Sponsorships and the teams a given prize money for were they finish at the end of the season e.g. Red bull got $140 million in prize money making their total earning over $300 million which is not accounted for on the profits, do yeah they make a shid load of money
WORLD RALLY CHAMPIONSHIP (WRC), at least its Rally1 car category is going zero carbon synthetic fuel from season 2025 and onward. And they are dropping hybrid power.
You need to watch her video with max verstappen. Its even more educational.
Formula E is already a thing has been for a while
the person who made the video is a new DTS fan who doesn't really know the diehard f1 fan stuff like F1 not being allowed to be all electric while Formula E exists. Her ending comments about an electric future of F1 just goes to show how surface level all of her understandings are like you'd need a nuclear reactor in the rear to generate enough electricity for a full f1 race because of the high drag and power output of F1 cars and I don't think anybody wants nuclear reactors going 200 kmh around corners
@@pandre5458 take it easy on her, she’s new to F1 and each one of us was in her position at some point
F1 will run on alcohol before being a pure electric series
You are right, not Cleo. I mean... of ccurse things have been tried, but not successfully. F1 kinda made all these "ideas" be real inventions what trizle down into car industry. Every modern cars is a cheap symbiosis form a WRC, Dakar, Le Mans and F1 car, only that the inventions are used for the opposite, like keeping the costs low and the efficency and safety high, while having okay speed for the roads.
will you start watching F1 races in general? :)
they used to spend more than 400mili....
i like you girl 😊 greeting from the netherlands
Please react to Lewis Hamilton top 10 moments
How do you not know about DRS when you already reacted to a video explaining about DRS? Are you even interested?
Clearly not. She keeps talking over the actual commentary being explained.
Lipstick and shirt almost a match 👻
I have decided not to say anything nice about Venezuela!😅😅😅
Can you maybe pause when you’re talking?
And sound less arrogant. When she talks, she sounds like she knows f1