Una interpretazione profondamente lirica e romantica di un pezzo ultra romantico nella produzione del grandissimo maestro Tchaikovsky. Non è vero che gli interpreti contemporanei sono incolori e pavidi. Qui c’è arte e coraggio, signori. Bravissimi.
Une splendide version de ce trio en La majeur, de 1882,, composé à la mémoire d'un grand artiste, ici interprétée par trois grands artistes. Excellente prise de son.
I discovered this piece recently (also in my 70's). It's my favorite piece of Tchaikovsky's, i think his finest work. Right up there with the greatest piano trios in the classical repertory.
Pues francamente no soy en absoluto ni un conocedor ni un erudito musical pero si puedo disfrutar, ahora con esta obra del maestro ruso que ya no lo es porque se ha hecho maestro universal...uno siente emoción grande al simplemente sintonizar en esta aplicación esta interpretación y surgen desde la fantasía, vibraciones de alegría, tristeza, sentimientos oceánicos que puede uno dejar esparcir como energía musical por todo el orbe y al miso tiempo puede comprenderse qué significa la expresión el arte suprime barreras, es la paz, somos uno, vida, luz...y llanto!!!
@@Janaceks_Dad They omitted the vital fugal variation no.8 that I was comparing between different ensembles (please see my separate comment). Having ascertained that, I did not listen to the whole piece to see if anything else was missing.
Ah, enfin une version qui me plait. De la finesse! C'est mieux que le mytique trio Rubinstein, Heifetz, Piatigorsky et bien sûr bien mieux que les nombreuses lourdes versions avec Maïsky.
oui mais il y a aussi Richter, kagan et Gutman, Gilels, Kogan et Rostro, ainsi que Repin, Yablonsky et Berezovsky pour les versions russes qu'il ne faut pas oublier, même si les codes interprétatifs ne sont pas les mêmes. Superbe version tout de même. Espérons que ce trio perdurera. En ce qui concerne Rubinstein, l'enregistrement date de 1950 et a été réalisé dans son appartement parisien, ce qui peut expliquer un cdertain manque de présence due à la prise de son. JLC
Piano Trio A Minor (Tchaikovsky) 00:43 I. Pezzo elegiaco 19:18 II. Tema con variazioni 21:15 VAR N 2 Piu Mosso 21:50 VAR N 3 Allegro Moderato 22:43 VAR N 4 L'stesso tempo (Allegro Moderato) 23:55 VAR N 5 L'stesso tempo 24:45 VAR N 6 Tempo di Valse 27:08 VAR N 7 Allegro Moderato 28:22 VAR N 9 Andante Flebile ma non tanto 31:37 VAR N10 Tempo di Mazurka 33:08 VAR N11 Moderato 35:39 : Variazone Finale E Coda 38:58 : Andante con Moto
Now that we have the funeral version available, this performance is so sad, it's breaking my heart guys, let us fans have the cheer up version, let us feel the Spring time Renaissance spirit in your hearts Ok? Music is so beautiful because you can go creative in infinite boundless ways
Extraordinario trio,mas,lamentable que la acústica de la sala o la ecualizacion no es buena,demasiado volumen del piano, cuando el piano suena piano se escucha fabuloso. Gran trabajol y del mas alto nivel musical,bella interpretacion👍
Very fine performance, but too bad they omitted the fugal variation in the last half. You can hear the fugue in Kantorow's other video of this piece with French string players, and they also do the hair-raising fuller version of the final variation before the coda.
Why did you omit the fugal variation no. 8 that should have been played at 28:16? Too diffficult? Why has no one else pointed this out in one and a half years?
@James Andrewes Thanks for this info, you are correct. Also Tchaik. indicated a big chunk of the finale was optional. Still, the operative word was "можно"= "one can" and most other trios play the material, for good reason.
@@ArthratraxIndebted-58 you obviously like the fugue 🙂 I'm on the fence. To me, it doesn't really add much, given that the previous movement already ends on an exhilarating high, setting up the surprise of the melancholy C# minor variation to come. And fugues usually come at the end of a set of variations, so it seems misplaced. I can see why Tchaikovsky suggested this variation could be cut (as opposed to any of the other variations, which, to me, have more character). In what way do you feel the fugue is 'vital', as you mentioned in another comment?
@@jamesandrewes9640 I guess because fugues were rare in late-romantic music and Tchaikovsky was quite adept at them, writing several including for Orchestral Suite No 1 and various piano pieces before this Trio. A good performance--on YT for example Viviane Hagner & Co (who play it hell-for-leather) or Kirill Troussov & Co (more lyrical) should hold the listener's attention from the first piano entry in octaves and then with the visible contrapuntal interplay of the string and piano voices. The trio is poorer without it in my opinion, whatever conventions may apply as to its positioning within a set of variations. According to Wikipedia it seems the entire trio was an experiment anyway at the request of Nadezhda von Meck, because Tchaikovsky disliked the instrumental combination.
![[#2024MAMA] G-DRAGON - 무제(Untitled, 2014)+POWER+HOME SWEET HOME+뱅뱅뱅+FANTASTIC BABY | Mnet 241123 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox29z5Nf1Uk/mqdefault.jpg)
チャイコフスキ－の音楽性を崇美に引き上げた.3人の素晴らしい演奏技術がチャイコフスキ－独特の粘着質な曲想を、ペトロ－ヴアもカント－ロフもパスカルモ。3人3様に、絡み合いながらレヴエルの高い曲を作り上げていると思い、聞き入りました。
Great performance. So touching, So beautiful and virtuoso.
Great players and musicians, especially the violinist
Alexandrw Kantorov👏👏
The violonist is absolutely brilliant! So much lyricism!!!
10: 57 ❤
Una interpretazione profondamente lirica e romantica di un pezzo ultra romantico nella produzione del grandissimo maestro Tchaikovsky. Non è vero che gli interpreti contemporanei sono incolori e pavidi. Qui c’è arte e coraggio, signori. Bravissimi.
Une splendide version de ce trio en La majeur, de 1882,, composé à la mémoire d'un grand artiste, ici interprétée par trois grands artistes. Excellente prise de son.
Si mes souvenirs sont bons il s'agissait d'Anton Rubinstein !
Trio magnifico per un opera splendida.
Какое тонкое и проникновенное исполнение гениальной музыки П.И.Чайковского! Ансамбль молодых музыкантов великолепен!
Thank you. This is terrific.
Trio Magnifiquement difficile et sublimement joué. Interprétation à garder comme référence
The beginning of this Trio is absolutely beautiful, so poignant!
appassionante,emozionante, grande musica, grandi musicisti.
Never heard this piece in 75 years of concert going! Great discovery to make after all this time. Great performance of beautiful music,
75 years ! That’s a lot of experience. Hopefully that will be me someday !
I discovered this piece recently (also in my 70's). It's my favorite piece of Tchaikovsky's, i think his finest work. Right up there with the greatest piano trios in the classical repertory.
The version I like most is Kissin , Bell and Maisky.
emotion and fury, sublime and immortal thanks Liya Petrova!♡🎻
Alexandre Kantorow!🎹 & Aurélien Pascal!🎻
I’ve listened to several editions of this piece; this one has the magic!
Pues francamente no soy en absoluto ni un conocedor ni un erudito musical pero si puedo disfrutar, ahora con esta obra del maestro ruso que ya no lo es porque se ha hecho maestro universal...uno siente emoción grande al simplemente sintonizar en esta aplicación esta interpretación y surgen desde la fantasía, vibraciones de alegría, tristeza, sentimientos oceánicos que puede uno dejar esparcir como energía musical por todo el orbe y al miso tiempo puede comprenderse qué significa la expresión el arte suprime barreras, es la paz, somos uno, vida, luz...y llanto!!!
Exceptional playing with special mention to this exceptional pianist, BRAVO!!!
この人たち凄い…！！！
Stunning performance by 3 exceptional musicians! Superb, sublime, sonorous! Bravo!!!
The playing is excellent, careful and passionate but not out of order. Bravo!
Violín y chelo fantásticos.
ах, какие молодцы!
Stunning performance of probably the most difficult trio in the entire repertory...
If they actually played all of it..
@@ArthratraxIndebted-58 ??
@@Janaceks_Dad They omitted the vital fugal variation no.8 that I was comparing between different ensembles (please see my separate comment). Having ascertained that, I did not listen to the whole piece to see if anything else was missing.
力強さと、繊細さが素晴らしい。凄い!
Невероятно сильное впечатление от исполнения! Браво!!!👏👏👏
This is my favorite piece of music . so sentimental and touching. deep .
It's stunning indeed. I discovered It 6 years ago with Kissin, Bell and Maisky.
As far as chamber music is concerned there is nothing to compare.
Breathtaking from the very first to the very last note. Bravissimi!!!!
Ah, enfin une version qui me plait. De la finesse! C'est mieux que le mytique trio Rubinstein, Heifetz, Piatigorsky et bien sûr bien mieux que les nombreuses lourdes versions avec Maïsky.
oui mais il y a aussi Richter, kagan et Gutman, Gilels, Kogan et Rostro, ainsi que Repin, Yablonsky et Berezovsky pour les versions russes qu'il ne faut pas oublier, même si les codes interprétatifs ne sont pas les mêmes. Superbe version tout de même. Espérons que ce trio perdurera.
En ce qui concerne Rubinstein, l'enregistrement date de 1950 et a été réalisé dans son appartement parisien, ce qui peut expliquer un cdertain manque de présence due à la prise de son. JLC
Fantastic performance.
Thank you for sharing.
医師会オーケストラのコンミス、開業医です。
終始、チャイコフスキー独特の美しい旋律ですが、
呼吸とタイミングを合わす事がとても難しい曲でもあります。このトリオの演奏家の皆さんは、卓越した技術力を備えています。
So beautiful... wonderful performance
What an absolute excellent performance. Everything about this is great… sound, tone… togetherness as if it grew that way!! Bravo
Bravissimi!
WOW! i think that says it all. My now favorite YT performance of this masterpiece.
Beautiful.
Piano Trio (Tchaikovsky)
00:43 I. Pezzo elegiaco
19:18 II. Tema con variazioni
Thanks!
very thanks
Awesome interpretation
Great performance, Bravo! 🎹🎼🎶✨
My favorite Piano Trio. This is awsome but the version I like most is Kissin, Bell and Maisky
Piano Trio A Minor (Tchaikovsky)
00:43 I. Pezzo elegiaco
19:18 II. Tema con variazioni
21:15 VAR N 2 Piu Mosso
21:50 VAR N 3 Allegro Moderato
22:43 VAR N 4 L'stesso tempo (Allegro Moderato)
23:55 VAR N 5 L'stesso tempo
24:45 VAR N 6 Tempo di Valse
27:08 VAR N 7 Allegro Moderato
28:22 VAR N 9 Andante Flebile ma non tanto
31:37 VAR N10 Tempo di Mazurka
33:08 VAR N11 Moderato
35:39 : Variazone Finale E Coda
38:58 : Andante con Moto
Now that we have the funeral version available, this performance is so sad, it's breaking my heart guys, let us fans have the cheer up version, let us feel the Spring time Renaissance spirit in your hearts Ok? Music is so beautiful because you can go creative in infinite boundless ways
Sad performance?
I think you probably meant what sad music?
SUBLIME
사운드 아주 좋습니다
33:04-35:28 They get it! 👏🏻👏🏻
So delicious
Extraordinario trio,mas,lamentable que la acústica de la sala o la ecualizacion no es buena,demasiado volumen del piano, cuando el piano suena piano se escucha fabuloso.
Gran trabajol y del mas alto nivel musical,bella interpretacion👍
А почему вариацию-фугу не сыграли??? И последняя вариация сокращена :(((((((
Very fine performance, but too bad they omitted the fugal variation in the last half. You can hear the fugue in Kantorow's other video of this piece with French string players, and they also do the hair-raising fuller version of the final variation before the coda.
Why did you omit the fugal variation no. 8 that should have been played at 28:16? Too diffficult?
Why has no one else pointed this out in one and a half years?
The score says "This variation can be omitted" (a cut permitted by Tchaikovsky himself).
@James Andrewes Thanks for this info, you are correct. Also Tchaik. indicated a big chunk of the finale was optional. Still, the operative word was "можно"= "one can" and most other trios play the material, for good reason.
@@ArthratraxIndebted-58 you obviously like the fugue 🙂 I'm on the fence. To me, it doesn't really add much, given that the previous movement already ends on an exhilarating high, setting up the surprise of the melancholy C# minor variation to come. And fugues usually come at the end of a set of variations, so it seems misplaced. I can see why Tchaikovsky suggested this variation could be cut (as opposed to any of the other variations, which, to me, have more character). In what way do you feel the fugue is 'vital', as you mentioned in another comment?
@@jamesandrewes9640 I guess because fugues were rare in late-romantic music and Tchaikovsky was quite adept at them, writing several including for Orchestral Suite No 1 and various piano pieces before this Trio. A good performance--on YT for example Viviane Hagner & Co (who play it hell-for-leather) or Kirill Troussov & Co (more lyrical) should hold the listener's attention from the first piano entry in octaves and then with the visible contrapuntal interplay of the string and piano voices. The trio is poorer without it in my opinion, whatever conventions may apply as to its positioning within a set of variations. According to Wikipedia it seems the entire trio was an experiment anyway at the request of Nadezhda von Meck, because Tchaikovsky disliked the instrumental combination.
@Queeen q .... Это обман, не так ли?