That's because they have a 3D placement inside one single plan in the fourth dimension(s). Let's make the 4thD a gradient line, if the tree is there in the plane "1", it's not there on the "2" plane. Smooth transitionning between planes (float values like '1.5') in the 4th D may have them appear and disappear smoothly. 4DMiner uses a more subtle terrain generation that makes every plane having some "4D" coherence (where there's a tree in one of the plans, there's a tree or alike in the other plans, or some more granular transitionning). Don't think it's so much of a problem tho, this technical 1D-to-4D is impressive just by itself.
@@gweltazlemartret6760 They still would look very weird to a 4D being, as the leaves don't go out from the trunk in one of the directions, but do in the others
@@illegallynamed8575 yeah, but you try to reason in a 3D-to-4D way; It turns out, one of the 4D planes may contain a castle, some other plane a tree, some other an ocean, some other null... 4DMiner is "wrong" as you can't predict for sure what's in another plane based on the current one, and it's actually barely more than a multi-chunk bloated on itself than a real multi-dimensional thing. (Same as multi-D spiders, harvesting a multi-D trunk or a multi-D leaf should harvest it on all the planes at once.)
Right… The trees in this version are 3D. They have length, width, and height but don’t really make use of the 4th dimensional component. (I guess technically they would have a magnitude of 1 in that dimension). Since the terrain is generated smoothly across all 4 dimensions, probably would make sense to have the trees make use of the 4th dimensional component too. Not sure if this is exactly how it should work, but in my mind, it would make sense for the trunk to only be in one slice (length and width are 1 block wide, so make the 4d component also 1) but then the leaves would reach out into the 4th dimension the same amount that they do into the other dimensions. If a jungle/dark oak tree with a 2x2 trunk was added, then the trunk would occupy two slices having a tree base of 2x2x2 and then the height. Haven’t played 4D Miner, from the videos it looks like it does a good job of building its objects using all 4 dimensions, not just populating slices with disjunct 3D objects. But also the perspective of that game is fundamentally different than this implementation since I think you can rotate your perspective (which would allow you to actually view the continuity of each dimension) whereas this one always orientates you the same way and just shifts the character through the slices one by one (only allowing you to see the continuity of the X and Z dimensions for any given slice)
Amazing! People have made videos on Minecraft in different dimensions, but I've never seen anyone go all the way from one to four dimensions in the same video! The video itself is very high quality and deserves many more views!
Its really cool, everything was good executed and explained right. But the 1d textures shouldn't be there, because of the 1d, which means that the textures in a real 1d game could only be colored stripes, because you can expand the 1st dimension to make it visible to humans.
That's not necessary. For example, take the Super Mario 64 game, where the bomb boss (i don't rebember the name) it's just a 2D object inside the 3D world.
Yes, but this 2d object in a 3d world was just 2d, and not 3d, even if it was in a 3d world. You can always show things with other dimensional "configuration" as the medium on which you are showing it proper, as long as it has fewer dimensions than the medium (1d on 2d screen).
@@grottenolm_gaming3861 To make you understand: You are saying that the textures must be in 1D? Look at minecraft, the textures are 2D instead of 3D models.
@@malwaremation-informaticaa9749 The textures are 2d, but together, they are 3d. The textures in the game were 2d, in a 1d world. The textures had more dimensions than the space they were in.
What would really be valuable in a game like this with 4 dimensions would be a set of structures that, once placed in one dimension, are then placed across every dimension. Universal 4th dimensional blocks.
nicely done!! almost every other dev makes 4d the wrong or not the fully right way, but you did the real deal thanks for the effort! although smoother transition between slices would have been nicer
I love this take on 4DMC!! I think I actually prefer this gridbased version gameplay wise to Mashpoes system, even if that system is probably a more "realistic" represenation of what 4DMC *should* look like. This system just feels a lot more playable to me
y'know, since 2d goes from 1 degree to 360 degrees, just adding on a new direction, 4d might be super simple and just add on a line going from corner to corner of the shape which would be in another direction, maybe just a weird way to connect every singular corner to eachother in every singular way possible?
In order to make a wall in the 4th dimension, you need to build a cube on each 4d side of your house. This way a player cannot simply walk into the house as they'll be blocked by the cube.
For the first two examples, you used a different perspective then the latter two, such as your viewing Steve from the 3rd person perspective in the 1D and 2D examples, as in, you the player is seeing the entire 2D/3D plane instead of what just Steve is seeing. This makes sense though, most games labeled 2D are not also labeled first person, because of the complicated and un-playable nature. It would be cool to see these examples in different perspectives.
Ooh imagine building a house segmented between floors (with gaps in between, maybe a 2 or 3 layer gap), and the only way to find the ladder/staircase (whichever) to each floor is to move forwards in the 4th dimension!! I'd definitely buy and download this if it was free to public and was further developed. 👏Good job!
This got me wondering whether you could have 4d walls for your house, I guess if the game stops you from moving through 4d when encountering a block, you could just move to one "side" of your house in 4d, build a solid structure filling your house with blocks, then move to the other "side" and do the same thing. Voilá, 4d walls.
Yeah that's exactly the way That's also how 3d walls work if you think about it: a 3d house consists of many 2d slices that are hollow rectangles, except the start and end slices which are completely filled with blocks
You need 4D thickness. Basically, tesseracts can exist along multiple 3D planes in the way that cubes exist on multiple 2D planes. It would appear as if the block existed, then didn't, but with a longer span of "existence."
the 1D is technically 2D, since the texture of the blocks are lined at the Y axis. if you really want to make a 1d game, make a 1 pixle grid and zoom in, then color it. this way the pixles are not allined to the Y axis and are ready to go
Moot point, becaude pixels have two dimensional size. A true 1D game would be impossible to play on any type of hardware we have with that logic, since anything in 1D space would have infinitesimal height. That 1D representation used in the video is the best that could be used to represent Minecraft.
Imagine a way to transpose or lock down an area to just 3 demensions, maybe not wipe out all of the fourth dimension in that region but force it to not be accessible. That way this 3D structure is at every point within the 4D-ness or aspect or region of the place. Hmm
I like classic Minecraft stuff from 2010 and the system of breaking blocks, collecting, crafting, and do something more. Looks like it made from Unity. If no, I don't know where you made. But this video made nice. 👍
By definition, by moving through the 4th demension for enough time, you are no longer in the same chunk. Although it appears as if you are not moving, you actually are moving along the axis we cannot perceive, so it isn’t quite accurate to say every chunk has infinite blocks.
So this is very similar to what @Mashpoe did, except instead of -“smooth” 4D rotation (rotate XW by ~4°) - or “smooth” 4D translation (translate along W by ~0.3 blocks), It is “discrete” 4D translation (translate along W by exactly 1 block). Actually, while you're at it, you might as well add - “discrete” 4D rotation (rotate XW by exactly 90°) - 4D view alignment, where you choose X, and Z, in the view to be either X and Z, Z and W, or W and X respectively. Very cool project, you've inspired me, I might code my own 3D-slice-of-4D-voxel-world myself someday too now.
What if there are half-dimensions, such as 2.5D where 3D entities traverse alonf a 2D plane, kind of like a 3D entity in a 4D space, but the 3D guy can see the edge of the world and can only move forward, backward, up and down and not freely, It looks like you're walking on a piece of paper but you can't fall through it. Think of it as a 2D platformer but all the characters are rendered in 3D as sprite pngs.
You are moving through fixed amounts of worlds so your 4th dimension is actually snapped with increments of 1 and every increment is a 3D world. What would be better is to make an alternative view so you know exactly where you are in the 4th Dimension, but during transition, for example w = 0.6 you see 0.4 of the one 3D world and 0.6 of the other 3D world. That would make it intuitive to have at least 6 dimensions and possibly infinite. Infinite dimensions are easy once you do 6, but it's losing purpose. Long story short a 4D Minecraft world can have all your worlds into one.
I would love it you could do way more things now like another whole entity in the 4th demision that atr=tack only in 4th demsion and it could been infested with mobs
Wow, a few days ago I looked at the view counter of this video and it had about 500 views, now it suddenly has tens of thousands of views 🤯
Congratulations,,
By the way, If it is legal, I would totally download this if you ever feel like releasing it!
Salvee, to ligado que vc é br, da pra perceber kkkkkkk, mas enfim, ótimo trabalho! 👏
TH-cam algorithm god have bless you
Can I play this game?
It's a little odd that the trees have no 4D "thickness" and just pop into existence all at once.
That's because they have a 3D placement inside one single plan in the fourth dimension(s). Let's make the 4thD a gradient line, if the tree is there in the plane "1", it's not there on the "2" plane. Smooth transitionning between planes (float values like '1.5') in the 4th D may have them appear and disappear smoothly.
4DMiner uses a more subtle terrain generation that makes every plane having some "4D" coherence (where there's a tree in one of the plans, there's a tree or alike in the other plans, or some more granular transitionning). Don't think it's so much of a problem tho, this technical 1D-to-4D is impressive just by itself.
@@gweltazlemartret6760 They still would look very weird to a 4D being, as the leaves don't go out from the trunk in one of the directions, but do in the others
@@illegallynamed8575 yeah, but you try to reason in a 3D-to-4D way; It turns out, one of the 4D planes may contain a castle, some other plane a tree, some other an ocean, some other null...
4DMiner is "wrong" as you can't predict for sure what's in another plane based on the current one, and it's actually barely more than a multi-chunk bloated on itself than a real multi-dimensional thing. (Same as multi-D spiders, harvesting a multi-D trunk or a multi-D leaf should harvest it on all the planes at once.)
Right… The trees in this version are 3D. They have length, width, and height but don’t really make use of the 4th dimensional component. (I guess technically they would have a magnitude of 1 in that dimension).
Since the terrain is generated smoothly across all 4 dimensions, probably would make sense to have the trees make use of the 4th dimensional component too.
Not sure if this is exactly how it should work, but in my mind, it would make sense for the trunk to only be in one slice (length and width are 1 block wide, so make the 4d component also 1) but then the leaves would reach out into the 4th dimension the same amount that they do into the other dimensions. If a jungle/dark oak tree with a 2x2 trunk was added, then the trunk would occupy two slices having a tree base of 2x2x2 and then the height.
Haven’t played 4D Miner, from the videos it looks like it does a good job of building its objects using all 4 dimensions, not just populating slices with disjunct 3D objects. But also the perspective of that game is fundamentally different than this implementation since I think you can rotate your perspective (which would allow you to actually view the continuity of each dimension) whereas this one always orientates you the same way and just shifts the character through the slices one by one (only allowing you to see the continuity of the X and Z dimensions for any given slice)
They're moving by chunk in the 4th direction. The whole chunk changes
4:03 classic looking minecraft with those lightings looks absolutely amazing
shaders
@@pikagiuppy93 homie, it's built into the engine itself, it isn't shaders
@@UltraCenterHQ i think they're just comparing it to shaders
@@UltraCenterHQ it is shaders though, the engine uses shading
@@UltraCenterHQ it is
Amazing!
People have made videos on Minecraft in different dimensions, but I've never seen anyone go all the way from one to four dimensions in the same video!
The video itself is very high quality and deserves many more views!
Hey, you seem very good at programming and gamedev too! You should make a 4D Minecraft game too.
😉
U have a nice programming skills and nice work on the 4D world:-D
Underrated video
he is! check his channel its cool
@@simplylight4916 Did you click the read more icon on my comment?
Yo, this is EPIC! Really nice job :)
It's the drip
i mean drop
Ohh, its you who did the original 1D Mibecraft idea
Water drop
I think you @DelugeDrop did better with the 1D Minecraft
Its really cool, everything was good executed and explained right. But the 1d textures shouldn't be there, because of the 1d, which means that the textures in a real 1d game could only be colored stripes, because you can expand the 1st dimension to make it visible to humans.
But you get a sub :)
That's not necessary. For example, take the Super Mario 64 game, where the bomb boss (i don't rebember the name) it's just a 2D object inside the 3D world.
Yes, but this 2d object in a 3d world was just 2d, and not 3d, even if it was in a 3d world. You can always show things with other dimensional "configuration" as the medium on which you are showing it proper, as long as it has fewer dimensions than the medium (1d on 2d screen).
@@grottenolm_gaming3861 To make you understand: You are saying that the textures must be in 1D? Look at minecraft, the textures are 2D instead of 3D models.
@@malwaremation-informaticaa9749 The textures are 2d, but together, they are 3d. The textures in the game were 2d, in a 1d world. The textures had more dimensions than the space they were in.
Even if the games were sorta simplistic, the quality of the 4th dimensional one is insane! Well done sir!
What would really be valuable in a game like this with 4 dimensions would be a set of structures that, once placed in one dimension, are then placed across every dimension. Universal 4th dimensional blocks.
What about a block that can be toggled between multiple planes?
but then in order to place it, it would have to be put in a place that is empty across every 3D layer, which would be pretty hard to find.
Bru, this is just called a 4D block. A tesseract.
@@LineOfThy Create has a mirror feature which can place blocks in multiple areas by using a mirror
@@Flodu60500 an infinitely long one as well
Just how?
The 1D and 2D was so smooth.
Did you coded this entirely from scratch or dod you used a engine like UE or Unity?
its not from scratch xd
@@turtleman1288well...
The second one was coded in scratch
@@turtleman1288 "entirely from scratch" means be made it completely himself. It doesn't mean he made it _in_ Scratch™
nicely done!! almost every other dev makes 4d the wrong or not the fully right way, but you did the real deal thanks for the effort!
although smoother transition between slices would have been nicer
For smoother transitions u need a nasa pc
@@herrlehrer1479 not necessarily
@@herrlehrer1479 4d miner had better transitions doe
@@reuppbee8872 yeah but its kinda weird, blocks turn into different shapes like triangles, hexagons and etc
@@Exolyne- cuz it's litteraly how 4d works what we see in the video is him moving 1 block at a time while 4d miner is smoother
4d is basically just smoking (questionable plants) then going outside for a walk
Blocks shrinking before being picked up is actually really cool.
I love this take on 4DMC!! I think I actually prefer this gridbased version gameplay wise to Mashpoes system, even if that system is probably a more "realistic" represenation of what 4DMC *should* look like. This system just feels a lot more playable to me
This version uses 4D strafing instead of 4D rotation. However, 4D minor also has strafing now.
and yeah, 4d wall to protect from entering form the other 3d slice is clever, didn't think about it before ;)
i gotta say, something so addictive about how those blocks pop when you break them in the 2d version
y'know, since 2d goes from 1 degree to 360 degrees, just adding on a new direction, 4d might be super simple and just add on a line going from corner to corner of the shape which would be in another direction, maybe just a weird way to connect every singular corner to eachother in every singular way possible?
that's not how dimensions work
The last one was very interesting! :D
In order to make a wall in the 4th dimension, you need to build a cube on each 4d side of your house. This way a player cannot simply walk into the house as they'll be blocked by the cube.
ive never understood the 4th dimension but this finally helped me get it
For the first two examples, you used a different perspective then the latter two, such as your viewing Steve from the 3rd person perspective in the 1D and 2D examples, as in, you the player is seeing the entire 2D/3D plane instead of what just Steve is seeing. This makes sense though, most games labeled 2D are not also labeled first person, because of the complicated and un-playable nature. It would be cool to see these examples in different perspectives.
The 3d minecraft breaking felt satisfying
Your fan creation is really good! I like it!👍👍
Caramba man, um Brasileiro fazendo vídeos em inglês e ainda bombando, man, tu é incrível! +1sub
Honestly Perlin noise would've been better for this, but it works best for 2D tho
Ooh imagine building a house segmented between floors (with gaps in between, maybe a 2 or 3 layer gap), and the only way to find the ladder/staircase (whichever) to each floor is to move forwards in the 4th dimension!! I'd definitely buy and download this if it was free to public and was further developed. 👏Good job!
This is the most amazing thing ive ever seen.
Sempre bom ver brasileiros trazendo esse tipo de conteúdo. Mt bom amigo, parabéns
underrated youtuber, so glad i got you on my recommended
bruh, you nailed it nicely done
This looks awesome, keep up the good/epic/cool/awesome work!
Excellent. I would 100% watch more videos on 4D Minecraft.
and then 5D minecraft introduces the concept of multiple timelines where each action has a consequence in the future
Nice video! Straight and to the point, none of the extra crap that most youtubers have :)
Man finally you're back. I was really worried about ya
This got me wondering whether you could have 4d walls for your house, I guess if the game stops you from moving through 4d when encountering a block, you could just move to one "side" of your house in 4d, build a solid structure filling your house with blocks, then move to the other "side" and do the same thing. Voilá, 4d walls.
Yeah that's exactly the way
That's also how 3d walls work if you think about it: a 3d house consists of many 2d slices that are hollow rectangles, except the start and end slices which are completely filled with blocks
You need 4D thickness. Basically, tesseracts can exist along multiple 3D planes in the way that cubes exist on multiple 2D planes. It would appear as if the block existed, then didn't, but with a longer span of "existence."
Hooray! You're back!
Imagine your playing old Minecraft with the old texture and 4 hotbars with a realistic lighting and physics
For it to be truly 1 dimensional, the blocks and player would all have to be solid colors
The gameplay is one-dimensional, but the graphics don't have to be.
the 1D is technically 2D, since the texture of the blocks are lined at the Y axis. if you really want to make a 1d game, make a 1 pixle grid and zoom in, then color it. this way the pixles are not allined to the Y axis and are ready to go
ty i was looking for a comment like this
Moot point, becaude pixels have two dimensional size. A true 1D game would be impossible to play on any type of hardware we have with that logic, since anything in 1D space would have infinitesimal height. That 1D representation used in the video is the best that could be used to represent Minecraft.
it is a 1D game projected onto a 2D screen in the way. By your logic, 3D games aren't 3D because we don't have holograms.
Wow, imagine a pvp based mod where you have to protect your base in other dimensions.
imagine having to track down and kill other people while they just travel dimensions
Imagine a hostile universe where you have to protect your own world and existence from lifeforms of higher dimensions
Boa mano continua assim otimo video vambora brasil 🇧🇷🇧🇷🇧🇷
Imagine a way to transpose or lock down an area to just 3 demensions, maybe not wipe out all of the fourth dimension in that region but force it to not be accessible. That way this 3D structure is at every point within the 4D-ness or aspect or region of the place. Hmm
that 1D steve is pretty cool!
this should be released (especially the 4d version), just with more blocks. i would totally purchase it!
They finally added 4th dimension - heaven
Interesting I learned what 4th dimension is
This is awesome and super interesting, sucesso pra ti.
4d Minecraft without the weird interp also looks way nicer
boa brazuca continua fazendo esses bglh pika
Aaaa, por isso o inglês era estranho, o cara é brasileiro, em fim ótimo trabalho parceiro, foi abençoado pelo algoritmo do youtube 100k views
Também percebi que tinha alguma coisa errada ksksks
Eu soube instantaneamente que o cara era brasileiro só pelo sotaque no "Dimensions"
Sinceramente, genial, o cara deitou!
@@andreyleonel255tbm kkkk
This is incredibly cursed but it’s really interesting!
Now make the 1D be from the perspective of the player, you don't get to see the blocks behind the block you're looking at
Nice work man
Crazy idea, Could such a mechanic be used to simulate time travel? Have the world periodically save chunks as new "Layers" within the 4th dimension?
Awesome, earned a sub
I like classic Minecraft stuff from 2010 and the system of breaking blocks, collecting, crafting, and do something more.
Looks like it made from Unity. If no, I don't know where you made. But this video made nice. 👍
"The Mirror Dimension- where i'm in control!"
By definition, by moving through the 4th demension for enough time, you are no longer in the same chunk. Although it appears as if you are not moving, you actually are moving along the axis we cannot perceive, so it isn’t quite accurate to say every chunk has infinite blocks.
This is really cool 👍
This is beautifuly made
Was kinda hoping to see 4d player and 4d camera and 4d blocks as well, but still pretty cool.
Have you checked out 4d miner? It's being buiolt as the full- featured version of 4d minecraft and they explain it really well.
5:08 when you experiment continental drift (timelap)
So this is very similar to what @Mashpoe did, except
instead of
-“smooth” 4D rotation (rotate XW by ~4°)
- or “smooth” 4D translation (translate along W by ~0.3 blocks),
It is “discrete” 4D translation (translate along W by exactly 1 block).
Actually, while you're at it, you might as well add
- “discrete” 4D rotation (rotate XW by exactly 90°)
- 4D view alignment, where you choose X, and Z, in the view to be either X and Z, Z and W, or W and X respectively.
Very cool project, you've inspired me, I might code my own 3D-slice-of-4D-voxel-world myself someday too now.
Epik video. Good channel
Is that a brazilian accent I hear? Conteúdo foda mano, parabéns
Thanks for using the old textures
O sotaque brasileiro é inigualável kk
Ss kkkkkkkk
exatamente kkkkkkkkk
Eu estava procurando esse comentário!
I love the dark pursuer
Is it me or my youtube being filled with 4 dimensions videos and im soo addicted to it
I think in 4D you should be able to fly, go up, down, nw, sw, ne, se. In simple terms move in any direction you like.
this is an incredibly simple way of looking at the fourth dimension, but still accurate... i guess?
Would love 2.5D isometric minecraft
Imagine him as a mojang employee. He made the terrain without any errors.
I hope Christopher Nolan makes his next high concept movie about the 4th dimension.
This man made minecraft simplified
Ficou sensacional, ótimo vídeo 🙏
q isso um br do nada?
Terrific!
Minecraft in 3D?! WHAT?! 😯
"Minecraft in 3 dimensions, this might be difficult."
can't wait for 5d minecraft
Amazing video.
Look up 4d miner it is very based
this would be an insane mod
i cant wait for your next content
Awesome!
We already have 4D on our screens.
no
This is really cool! The 4d trees are flat though.
Dude I need a download link, this is look INSANELY GOOD
Nice job :)
Wow it’s amazing how he travelled throw dimensions to make this for us
It's a little odd that the trees has well 4D ''thickness'' and just pop into existence all at once.
2:53 this is like the paper minecarft from scratch
Yes
I see your a man of culture as well
What if there are half-dimensions, such as 2.5D where 3D entities traverse alonf a 2D plane, kind of like a 3D entity in a 4D space, but the 3D guy can see the edge of the world and can only move forward, backward, up and down and not freely, It looks like you're walking on a piece of paper but you can't fall through it. Think of it as a 2D platformer but all the characters are rendered in 3D as sprite pngs.
Look up a game called “Elsword” for 2.5D
now we need a way to make 4d walls
You are moving through fixed amounts of worlds so your 4th dimension is actually snapped with increments of 1 and every increment is a 3D world. What would be better is to make an alternative view so you know exactly where you are in the 4th Dimension, but during transition, for example w = 0.6 you see 0.4 of the one 3D world and 0.6 of the other 3D world. That would make it intuitive to have at least 6 dimensions and possibly infinite. Infinite dimensions are easy once you do 6, but it's losing purpose. Long story short a 4D Minecraft world can have all your worlds into one.
I would love it you could do way more things now like another whole entity in the 4th demision that atr=tack only in 4th demsion and it could been infested with mobs
yeah, good work but i still prefer 4d miner as the "4d minecraft"
It's not like he's trying to compete
this came first
This is awesome
"Minecraft in 2d"
Teraria: "um, i think you missunderstod"
Whoah my dude just made minecraft in 3 Dimensions
well when he said creating mc in 3d, my mind said "just play minecraft so you wont do much effort" but i think That's the part of his content