Great,thank you sir very much. We need dedicated illustration to every new chapter nearly please 🙏 We have final master exam soon after 2 months. Please don't ignore 🙏
RF-CL classifieds patients into very low,low and moderate(highest percentage 45). Then tell us for ex. high risk( >50% - 85%) indication for functional imaging. According to RF-CL how to categorise high and very high risk patients?
It really depends on your scope of practice. If you're treating patients with hypertension, angina, or atrial fibrillation, staying up to date with the latest evidence is definitely a good idea-especially since there are now patient-friendly versions of the guidelines available. But hey, if you have even better evidence, feel free to stick with what works for you!
Thank you so much!
It’s my pleasure
Brilliant tutor and professor ❤
🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
Amazing as always my dear prof
Thanks a lot 😊
Great,thank you sir very much.
We need dedicated illustration to every new chapter nearly please 🙏
We have final master exam soon after 2 months.
Please don't ignore 🙏
I will try my best
RF-CL classifieds patients into very low,low and moderate(highest percentage 45). Then tell us for ex. high risk( >50% - 85%) indication for functional imaging. According to RF-CL how to categorise high and very high risk patients?
Yes that’s a good question. We’ll answer that in one of the coming episodes
Great as usual 👌
Thanks again!
Are you shure that new guidelines are really valuable for general practitioners?
It really depends on your scope of practice. If you're treating patients with hypertension, angina, or atrial fibrillation, staying up to date with the latest evidence is definitely a good idea-especially since there are now patient-friendly versions of the guidelines available. But hey, if you have even better evidence, feel free to stick with what works for you!
good video
Thanks 😊
amazing
Great