Lol this made me remember about the time when i made a fake chat log of one of my classmate in middle school that he did goofy stuff and i trolled him so bad he got clowned for the whole year
Former paralegal here, there are probably so many restrictions/clauses in the settlement terms that would prevent him from stating much of anything about the entire thing. Some of the things I've read in other settlements are borderline absurd. One that comes to mind prevented the client from even saying the name of the company in question in any form. Shit's crazy.
@exiledmonastic4650 NDAs are completely different from settlements insofar as the binding terms. Depending on the state that the settlement was signed in, they could have outlandish stipulations. TLDR, they most likely can put any stipulations they want in a settlement. "By accepting the settlement, you can not refer nor imply that we are stinky buttholes without having to pay us back plus interest".
Also, I found a different career because the legalese can be extremely difficult and confusing, so I may not be the best person to weigh in on this matter.
@exiledmonastic4650 It reminds me of the old lady burned by McDonald's coffee and suing. Most people assumed she was just a Karen, but no. The poor woman suffered 3rd degree burns from how hot it was. And when she sued, she got her money, but was not allowed to talk about it the rest of her life.
@exiledmonastic4650I have personally signed a settlement that was due to no wrong doing of my own, and yes it's that restrictive. I cannot say their name, I can not confirm or dent anything, I cannot even confirm I recieved the settlement from them
Legal NDAs about court settlings can be insane. One of my coworkers who settled with a company over wrongful termination that paid out flat out said the payout settlement agreement prohibits him from discussing anything that happened in the year that lead up to his termination. He cant even mention everyday life at the company. Edit: also any claims without evidence should be treated with a grain of salt
Don't grasp how people don't understand how a settlement can turn out. Settlements with major companies usually come paired with a "You can't talk about this with anyone because it could damage our brand and this settlement isn't an admission of guilt from us." tier NDA. Settlements are paid out by huge companies to avoid having their image tarnished and people usually accept them to avoid a super long legal process - as if the Dr. actually stuck to his case, this could STILL very well be going through the court system. The process is also very expensive until a verdict is reached, you're on the hook for your own legal costs until its over assuming you won. Anyone shook by this is uninformed or chasing drama.
@@mutantraze3681 Right, but if what Dr. Disrespect said is true then nothing illegal happened. Someone at Twitch could have made a false accusation that got Doc banned, Doc sues, Twitch settles on the conditions that Doc doesn't appeal his ban and doesn't discuss the events that lead up to the false accusations because that would make Twitch look bad. I would posit that this is a very likely turn of events because it allows for both Doc and Cody to be telling the truth. Doc _was_ banned for attempting to solicit sex from a minor, but unbeknownst to the people in charge of banning doc, the girl in question wasn't a minor and there is evidence that shows Doc knew she was legal age.
It's the fact that the guy who tweeted it was a twitch employee for like 8 years. It's not some random bozo, and other insiders have sort of been hinting at the same thing. Do you really think this guy would risk a massive defamation lawsuit against himself just for the lols? I'm not saying Dr Disrespect is guilty, but the whole situation is really odd.
Yet when there is evidence of wrongdoing, the internet suddenly doesn't care and replys with "It's YOUR fault this happened" to the victim (Logan Paul's cult). Twitter is the mistake, not everyone deserves a voice.
@@EventhorizonShadows He can't deny because of the NDA, if he says that he was not banned because of that he is breaching the NDA, from what I understand.
Personally, I think Doc should've responded by making a song about how he does NOT diddle kids. Give it a catchy hook like "Do not diddle kids, it's no good diddling kids."
@@Aethelbeorn He also disrespected his fans by telling them he's making a game, scamming millions from them, then never releasing it. Just another grifter getting his crypto bag on the back of his fans 🤣
“He tried to take advantage of a minor, so we did the best thing possible, we didn’t alert the authorities, instead we banned him from twitch and decided to dredge it up years later after any legal action could have been taken”
Well shouldn't this hypothetical person's parents really be the ones to pursue any action? If it were true they would have sued twitch into oblivion loooong ago
@@kenon6968Parents could not have the money, not be in the picture, or just shitty. No one knows so no assumptions can be made either way. Just have to wait and see if it’s true. Would hope not but at this point I wouldn’t be surprised. 2024 been proving Katt Williams right so far.
It makes sense bc Twitch only found out bc someone at Twitch looked at Doc’s whisper, which is supposed to be “private” so it doesn’t look good for Twitch as well.
@@aaaaaaaa-gu1md You're absolutely correct. I have just seen a lot of excuses already, which means that a lot of people who said they were waiting for proof actually didn't care whether or not there was inappropriate conduct. I fear that you're one of the few people who approached this situation in a principled manner.
I mean its proof something happened. I'm just still super confused on why Twitch had to pay a settlement to Doc if Doc is the one in the wrong. That little piece of info is making this whole thing confusing.
Yeah, Charlie saying people don’t get permabanned from Twitch often is laughable. There’s a ton of smaller male streamers dealing with unfair permabans, seems he’s very out of touch with how sexist the Twitch moderation team is and forgot the massive banwaves from back in the day Edit: for the pathetic people asking me for a list, literally all you have to do is check the Twitch subreddit. Not my job to compile a list for you because you're a lazy prick
@@cracovioemanuele8463 Are people so thinned skin they cant hear a color without connecting it to some racial connotation? Is this how we really want to be as people?
As someone living under a particularly bizarre NDA, I can tell you from experience that NDA's can be weirder than you thought possible. Freedom in 6 months....LOL.
Yep. A lot of jobs use NDAs but the people in the jobs I’m familiar with failed talk about what they aren’t supposed to. Word gets around fast and cats are out of the bag but no proof of whodunit since so many talk. All the time.
I understand people's concerns over advertising these energy drinks to minors and gamers that most likely sit on their ass all day, but damn that claw machine is rad
For those unaware, crimes cannot be covered by an NDA. So even if these acusations were true but nothing ever came of the conversation in question it would still be endangerment of a child (something like that) which is a crime. So most likely Twitch banned him because he was discussing contracts with competitors
Why would a company report it? Look it up, Subway knew about Jared's interest in children and didn’t do anything or report it. They came out with a statement after the fact when it came out. Corporations don't have to do anything.
@@BroadBeanSoup no. Obstruction is a specific thing that has to do with stopping a law enforcement agent from doing their job. Failing to report on potential crimes are our prerogative. Now if thy had went out of their way to say suppress the minor from coming forward that might be a form of obstruction. But companies just like people do not actually have to report crimes. It could open them up to being sued but it isn't obstruction.
@@BroadBeanSouptwitch wanted to axe dr disrespect for trying to work a deal with mixer. Easiest way to do that with any employee in any industry is to find a way to fire them with cause and not have to pay them. My guess is they used a loose (possibly even entirely fabricated) incident to cut ties with him, leak it to the media, and hope the doctor would just step away based on the threat of being cancelled. Huge miscalculation by twitch and now they are have been caught in a really bad look. Doc gets paid big in exchange for silence and twitch is saved the embarrassment. Everybody wins and this whole thing could have stayed buried if it wasn’t for one little former twitch employee who needed his 15 seconds of fame on twitter
Doc wasn’t the one being sued, he was suing Twich for the remainder of this contract. Twich paid BUT THEY DIDNT ADMIT wrong doing or were’t found to have unfairly terminated him. Doc has NEVER SAID HE DIDNT KNOW SHE WAS A MINOR or ever say that he thought she was an adult. He tried in his first replies to suggest his lawsuit against Twich somehow cleared him of any wrongdoing when it was a civil suit where he wasn’t even the defendant. The tweet isn’t from some random gossip anon account, it’s from CODY whos a known Verified Twich Partnership Manager. Who was very specific with the allegation that he would have been a first hand source being a Partnership manger at the time. And would obviously know he would get hung in court by Doc for defamation if there wasn’t logs. IF ANY OF YOU CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT IM SAYING AND ARE READING IN REVERSE. I THINK DOC KNEW HER AGE. AND SEXT HER ANYWAY.
@@nick191088 cause it's not a good look to have a pedo on your payroll either. Especially when you gave him access to a messenger app with the ability to text minors
@@nick191088 essentially they settled and used vague language to get out of bad publicity about it, kind of a "it wasnt legal but wasnt wrong for us to do that" type deal, most likely gave him a NDA/Gag order to not speak on it so he could keep the full payout, but now this ex employee wants to try and seemingly force him to talk about it, thus costing him the payout he got as to why though? well it is an ex twitch employee, they are all pretty fucking dumb/vindictive about pretty much everything
@@nick191088 If the reason they're cutting ties isn't explicitly against the terms of the contract. They could take a moral stand but still owe for the terms of the contract.
@@oneautumnleaff2119 NDAs can be tough alone, settlements can be borderline insane. I've heard of ones that prevent ever mentioning the company by name for the rest of your life (obviously difficult to prove if you're a private person but in this scenario could happen), otherwise you are liable for breaching the terms of settlement.
*Farming for twitter brownie points starter pack* -Former employee -Diddler allegations -Got from second hand source -Does not provide further evidence -Drops mic *A week later* -Goes into protected mode
defending a predator is wild, why would doc be quiet about it otherwise? he cheated on his wife with an 18 year old and you think him sexually messaging a minor is out of reach... disgusting
As someone who has been tied to multiple NDA's in the past, that's exactly what this sounds like. Someone I worked with came under threat of lawsuit just for finding a new job while under the same NDA, and ended up being fired from his new job. Shit is no joke.
@@LonelyGod64you telling me saying “I’m not a pedo” would violate a nda? Texting a minor isn’t illegal technically but it still frowned upon since he never met with them
@@P8nplays It potentially could be if the reason he was permanently banned was actually because of his whispers or even if he were to mention anything about the settlement. He would have to parrot any line his lawyers give him anyways, guilty or not, but NDA keeping his mouth shut makes the most sense for someone like Dr. Disrespect. It's not like anyone would who wouldn't believe him without saying it would believe him if he said it anyways. I fully believe this is just twitch staff being the same old idiots they usually are.
@@LonelyGod64 IF HE CANT SAY HE DIDNT IT MEANS HE DID USE THE THING INSIDE YOUR HEAD. why would a fucking nda prevent him from being able to deny being a pedo unless he was and did what they said he did.
@@j_f82 I am, that's why I'm not saying someone's a pedophile based on the word of a staff member from a company known to be biased and have innapropriate relationships with streamers. NDAs can block all sorts of things, which is why it's always smart to take your statements regarding anything that might do with them from your lawyer. If Twitch even made an accusation that turned out to be false it could be bound in an NDA to prevent someone from making their image look bad.
"Journalists" who withhold potentially fucked up info like this for YEARS should lose all credibility regardless of whether these allegations turn out to be true or not.
Exactly, the burden of proof is on the person making the claim. Otherwise you are at risk of entering a realm where you have to prove the non-existence of something.
@@danielreed5199except the court of public opinion is overflowing with tards and grifters, who subscribe to the opposite in which the accused must prove their innocence.... and try not to remember with horror those same people vote in elections
Why isn't he talking about it? Simple, they reached a court settlement amounting to "Okay, we pay you to make this go away, we don't admit we did anything wrong though. Also, you're not allowed to talk about the details of the case or settlement itself." Sounds fishy? No, these are pretty bog-standard settlement terms. Neither party "officially" admits wrong-doing but you can tell what's what from which way the money flows. I'd wager he was paid more than his contract was worth in exchange for never speaking of this again.
@@hazeion No criminal case was ever brought. Which isn't shocking, since no evidence was ever brought and no "victim" ever actually came forward. DrDisrespect sued Twitch for breach of contract.
You can't do that with criminal activity, though. If you have an NDA that prevents you from "talking about the company in a negative way" but you have knowledge of criminal activity YOU CAN GO TO THE POLICE WITH IT. If the company tries to execute the NDA, the judge will THROW IT OUT, AND CHARGE THEM WITH WITNESS TAMPERING AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY.
@@Null_Experis Yeah, but that's the thing isn't it. All they did was terminate his contract prematurely based on a nasty rumor (presumably to avoid bad PR). That's just what I'm saying, if Twitch had evidence that DrDisrespect did in fact try to solicit a minor (which they would have, if it took place on their messaging system as the rumor claims), they would NOT have settled the case. All of it points to the whole root of this story being horseshit. And he got shitcanned for it, so he took Twitch to court and got a massive (undisclosed) payout.
You guys are trying so hard to justify this. In what universe would any settlement term prevent him from simply saying he is not guilty of the sexting charges. This isn't info of the case at all, especially if he really wasn't sexting.
Charlie was saying on stream that there's no way Dr. Kidinspect's wife would stay with him if she knew about these allegations, but I think it's very believable when you remember that he brings in millions of dollars to their family. A lot of people would be okay with it if it means they get to keep a comfortable lifestyle.
If a person is capable of lying to their spouse, they're capable of lying to anybody. It would not surprise me if there's (at least) some truth to the allegations. It may not have been criminal, but something went on. Twitch are not dumb; They're losing millions by not having him on the platform.
@@chuckp342 yeah exactly. They wouldn't have let him go in the way that they did unless it was something like this. Plus as my grandma used to say 'once a cheater always a cheater'
@@baphomette3234 One thing I've not seen mentioned is the age of consent in a lot of states (e.g. not illegal). To me, a minor means under 18. I'm not saying the guy did or didn't do anything, but when you're a celebrity of his caliber, you have to be careful. Innocent chats could be turned against you easily. Hell, his audience is probably half minors.
You’re falling the HR bad narrative put out there by big business. HR is human resource, and are literally there to protect the employees. In most companies HR operates in its own org chart, and isn’t beholden to upper management, but instead is the only thing above upper management. Thus upper management wants you to hate hr. They make you think HR is only there to tell you can’t call people names. When in reality they’re telling management you can’t do mandatory OT, it’s bad for the employee. You can’t take benefits away it’s bad for the employee, and will hurt productivity.
@@thekurtrussell4007this is bs, the most disgusting people I've ever dealt with in my life was HR. Like, never been late once and barely ever took a vacation style my parents house burnt down and I had to take off to help them and the company attacked me and HR did nothing, I failed a breathalyzer test for work and it was proven it was low blood sugar, there was no alcohol in my piss, they said they already filled out the paperwork so kick rocks. Fuck HR. And piss off defending them.
@@thekurtrussell4007 Yeah that's some bullshit. Every company I've worked HR is a massive asshole. Like the one in the last place I worked was perfectly fine with upper management cussing us out in front of patrons. When employees became friends, she would tell us about how unionizing is bad for the place as a whole, and management isn't happy about us being friends (even though we didn't have a union). She would also talk about how being paid $8 (I was a much higher position than floor, so I received more but others didn't) an hour is a good wage, and said we're lucky to be working at this place. The state even came in since it was a pseudi-government position and she defended the low wages. One time she talked a Jewish employee out of suing the company after the Director in charge threatened to fire the lady over her not eating pork and not attending a Christmas party. HR does not care about the employee. They only exist for the company.
there’s probably an agreement between doc and twitch stating he can not state details of his case nor make disparaging comments towards the platform EDIT/UPDATE: nvm doc is a cradle robber
nah, just read between the lines : no wrongdoing, everything has been settled = come on guys, I didn't sleep with her, twitch had to pay me full to just f*ck off so it doesn't make any waves.
Unfortunately, you'll probably have a hard time trusting some Australians, New Zealanders, Tongans, Samoans, Fijians, some other Polynesians, rugby players, dykes, and any time travelers from the 80's
@DabDabGoose Yeah. Unless there is something I'm not understanding here. This is either a massive cover up and a lot of people are getting in trouble for illegally hiding a crime. Or a lot of people are getting sued for defamation and libel
@Sofus-fu4ro here's one of the comments in his defense 2 days ago "That allegation, without proof, is hearsay. Dr. Disrespect not acknowledging it and saying he did nothing illegal is the best way to go about it by dismissing the claim while skirting any NDA." They're not defending what he did to the minor, they're not saying pedophilia should be allowed, they're not saying any of that, they're simply saying he approached it in a very professional manner, and that its the best possible approach. So no... There is no way they could've known, because if you read the comment, they weren't even defending what he did, but how he approached it.
what about reactions that are against someone who is later proven innocent? Everyone was saying there was no proof so they don't believe it, it wasn't a defence against Doc, but a defence of "innocent until proven guilty"
@@ethandubois7536I would like to formally come forward with information that ethandubois7536 raped me last night. And since testimony is law, we need to take him to jail IMMEDIATELY
but they still have a forever lasting affect unfortunately even if the claimant were to say he was lying.. this would still have a huge affect on his life.
@@darthasavage7213 sadly thats the point its just a EX employee randomly saying it without any proof. People really wanna believe twitch paid to cover up a child SA issue its legit braiddead
@@darthasavage7213defaming to a degree, true. But if you can find the person who first started this rumor, they can be sued for defamation if the claim has no backing to it.
@@The_Zeta_Male Not really even if you settle out of court yada yada you get slammed with a bunch of "okay now dont talk about this this this or this. k thanks."
I could not handle being a well-known individual on the internet nowadays. It's so easy for some random to just blurt out something without proof that will put pressure on you, even if you haven't done anything wrong. It's like being a lonely woman in the late 1500's, and some guy shouts "witch!", and you got the whole village coming after you
FR. I like being able to walk around in public with nobody knowing who I am or saying things behind my back. Living like that would make me age faster from the stress alone. If I was famous then all the privacy I would of gotten if people did not know or care who I am would be gone.
it’s more so that e celebs don’t view themselves as full fledged celebrities with everyone paying attention to them, so they don’t expect to get caught doing bad things, most of these e celebs are straight up evil
@@jaimestardust8555 that doesn't matter? He admitted they were inappropriate conversations, he admitted they were a minor. That's it, he's a bad person because of that.
@@st4trips639 I'm not a fan of Dr Disrespect, but if he was unaware the person was a minor, that absolutely matters, what are you talking about, you have to be a kid, or your a Marxist living by the Marxist motto, "Guilty until proven innocent", now if he did know they were a teenager, then that is absolutely despicable, but as of now, it's not known, and he very well could of thought they were of age, after all, some Teens will over state their age for such and such reason, even tho it's rare it does happen, now it's harmless but for example, I did it to play Pot Farm Back in the day, if theirs a lesson to be learned here it is, don't just talk to anyone on the internet, and if you don't know them make sure who tf your talking to is an adult, doing a bit of research isn't hard, and it's not difficult to wait to assume or draw a full conclusion, untill more details come out, cause as of now things aren't all that clear, Innocent untill proven guilty
In my opinion, an ex twitch employee saying it, and then all of the sudden a bunch of other people "heard a similar story" holds no water. This is like blindly believing all of the negative things someone says about their ex after a bad breakup. There is bad blood. There may even be personal drama. Maybe He just doesn't like the Doc. A lot of people don't. A lot of people would love to see him be taken down. As far as I'm concerned, he is innocent until there is proof. The fact he was also never in legal trouble says a lot too. His name is out there and all that would be public record.
but he hasn’t said he hasn’t done it which is weird. if he hasn’t done it why doesn’t he just say that. he is dodging the question which makes him look guilty which he probably is
@@imapug_playz2907 if twitch forced an NDA for the payout he got then legally he cant give details on it, even if its squashing rumors because that would be giving details by denial remember he was shown that he wasnt terminated for any illegal action when he got the payout, if they had any sort of evidence about sexting a minor he most certainly wouldnt have been given a payout at all and before anyone claims they could have been covering it up ... that would make Twitch as a company a cohort to a crime, and fuck them over WAY harder then you would believe
I don’t think Charlie has ever settled or received a settlement. To this day, 2 years later, I am still contractually obligated to never talk about what I did at my last job or risk losing my settlement. Just in case I haven’t told anyone. Only my wife knows.
@@shaboingboing1 Lol it was a government job but it’s what I actually did and saw in there I can’t talk about. Idk how far the government would go so I won’t risk it. They’re probably reading this right now lol. It’s not too crazy tho just some government bs.
@@The_GeniMeans he’s just critiquing the phenomenon instead of changing it and the guy is basically equating that lack of action as equally negative, which is honestly not a crazy counter.
"Legal obligations" could literally be an NDA saying you cannot talk about anything specific pertaining to the ban or you owe us all of the money back.
That allegation, without proof, is hearsay. Dr. Disrespect not acknowledging it and saying he did nothing illegal is the best way to go about it by dismissing the claim while skirting any NDA.
@@g-g43 or maybe if you know how the legal system works, this happens in most cases of such nature, where a company messes up and settles by paying rather than public backlash - considering how big and loyal some Doc fans are, it makes sense they slapped an NDA on the paycheck so that they don't get their wrath.
@@redb8053 Because private companies have the right to ban someone at their discretion. If it is justified or not doesn't really matter to indicate if someone did something illegal or not.
smells like a gay legal maneuver where a company filled with ideologues like Twitch holds someone's tongue with an NDA, then gets one of their ex employees to deliver the slander. "Don't look at our degen booba business model of luring minors to our creator's OnlyFans, look at how much me care about minors in this imaginary Doc Disrespect scenario"
@@hemipenes As someone under an NDA, there is no NDA in America that would restrict you from denying responsibility for crimes you didn't commit, only crimes that you have committed or crimes in the vein of the crime you've committed. The bare minimum requirements not being met either means he's a) being oddly evasive for a straightforward question for no discernable reason, or b) he's done something similar to what is being alleged and the NDA he's signed prevents him from speaking about it.
@abdoulm.sorofino2642it’s odd for sure. But let’s not act like he wasn’t inappropriately messaging a child. Bend it whatever way you want you’re idol has already admitted to being a scumbag
Yeah, because it's a tweet from a former senior accounts lead at twitch. We've also had other streamers say they've heard the same thing. I hate this dumb BS of "We need DNA evidence and camera footage to prove anything happened". That has never been the case.
@@Sora-o I never said no proof was needed to find someone guilty but most criminal cases never even have the kind of "proof" you kids yap about. Most is circumstantial and most adults with functioning brains can put two and two together.
sexting a minor would be a crime, there would be no way in twitch would pay that out, and it would have been easily proved in discovery. baseless accusations imo.
The minor would have been exposed doc keep that in mind also remember the pro jarded situation. Let's go do doc like that just to look stupid at the end
@@Jayden1766-b7o The thing is dr disrespect came out to this rumor and said “no wrongdoing was acknowledged” which is the MOST SUS thing to say when asked about sexting a minor
@@oogskskfn and you really think Twitch rather pay to cover up any wrong doing on both ends over you know voiding his payout for committing a crime on their platform? Ipad kids are beyond brainrotted.
i feel so bad for anyone who has to be texted like this. when i was 11-12 i went through the exact same and was manipulated into sexting an much older man (whom i thought was my age) on a app i had hidden, skype. i’m so glad my mother and father found out before it escalated
@@mojojojo6400 What? He's just saying that the messaging service was likely chosen by Dr. Disrespect because it wasn't well monitored. They aren't defending the action or saying other people should do it. You do understand that, right?
If there's anything I learned about internet drama is this. Don't trust anything that comes from a former employee with no proof. If he texted minors through the whisper system, there's breadcrumbs in the system and twitch had no reason to settle. On the other hand, something unmistakenly fishy must've happened for twitch to have pulled the perma trigger without a care and fishy enough for twitch to prefer settling the case and die on that hill than unbanning him. Either way, either bring the evidence or stop with the "I heard this guy did this and that".
Refunding subs doesn't just take money away from Dr disrespect, it's money directly out of twitch's pocket, a lot of it. Twitch is run by amazon and has never been a big earner for them, something amazon hates. the only way they'd willing give back that much money to the public is if that money was going directly to a child predator under investigation, something that could get them legally fucked up and in a PR nightmare. Even rape allegations or sexual assault aren't treated as severe, pedos are simply in a league of their own, a universal evil.
I think he was “smart” enough to not get caught red handed. Was probably setting up some grooming situation. Legally speaking, he did nothing wrong, but morally hes guilty. They are all working a coverup. They paid him to pay the victim so everyone goes on “happily ever after”
If he was talking to a minor like that twitch would've reported him to the police. Not just ended the contract and then later admit fault and pay up. I can't believe anyone ever thought that accusation had merit. I think Charlie has personally had a direct effect on dumbing down gen z people. The kids who have watched his videos over the past few years have suffered brain rot listening to him give so many illogical takes. I watch him because he's funny but his inability to think properly has gotten worse and worse over the years
Its a current employee who said the tweet lol And that tweet was liked by several other twitch employees That man is so cooked it's not even funny and I hope this is finally the end for Doc
„He made a tweet without evidence but then more people made tweets without evidence so it could be true.“ Gotta disagree with this one Charlie. If we go by that logic then yes everything could be technically true.
The only evidence could be screenshots of the dms and sharing someones dms would obvs be against twitch policies regardless of the situation. Why would so many people come out and tell the exact same lie about a person? Youre being way too charitable to him maybe think about the victim instead of your streamer
You can have a conversation with minors and not be illegal but looked down upon. You can send a winky face to a minor and thats not illegal but most adults would say its inappropriate. Why cant he say my ban had NOTHING to do with minors instead of i didn't do anything wrong or illegal 🤔🤔
If you believe someone with his fame and exposure would do something so stupid on twitch chat then I am not surprised you believe everything that is said on twitter. Out of curiosity, how many times have you handed bank details to "girls in your area looking for fun" 😂😉
@@kingkunta3753 Doc got his money and signed an NDR, thats information we have. If Twitch won they wouldn't pay so they either lost or settled, since the Doc signed an NDA it was almost definitely settled. We can't with 100% certainty but its pretty darn close.
The craziest thing to out of this is everyone is quick to jump and cancel the Doc over allegations yet, U.S. politicians who have been caught in the process get off skrt free without any repercussions.
This is so important. We're more worried about a streamer than the people running the country. This is exactly what they want and exactly why they keep getting away with it.
@@strangerinastrangeland3613 idk where you got that information. His tweet was formed in a way where he avoided directly addressing the allegations and framed it as if he went through the process and no wrongdoing was committed and was paid out in full. Regardless I wish they had this energy for people that actually have undisputed public evidence like every one that Epstein list.
I've been through the legal system before, and as far as his "talking around things rather than flat-out saying he didn't do it" goes... I'm getting a giant whiff of "My lawyer advised me to never EVER talk about this."
It depends on the context of how they received their information. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if there were grounds to sue the twitch employee who made the tweet for defamation. As a journalist, you can get these stories all day long but unless it's backed with actual proof, you're risking defamation for yourself and your news publication. I'm guessing there is just very little viewable evidence of the situation. Either because it didn't happen (In Doc's defense) or it's sealed behind NDAs/court restrictions (In the accuser's defense)
Because it's a big "nothing". They would cancel the doc as fast as possible if they could, but they have nothing on him. Nothing. He sometimes get donos from depressed/suicid*l people, and he gives some of the warmest response you could imagine. It wouldn't surprise me if he alone has prevented many suici..s Sad to see Charlie's community be so toxic to a fellow content creator
there's a real moral grey area about it, because if they reported on what happened, people wouldn't believe it until the logs got released, and if the logs get released, then some internet weirdos will absolutely try to track down the person doc was texting
No wrong doing found. That's important. Details often confuse people, who, as the internet does, then take the worst selection of details in order to dunk, harass, demonized, etc. the target. No wrong doing found is perhaps the most important detail and people don't like it because they want to juice it up.
@@VioletElite4 Yeah no shit, if something doesn't exist you can't find it. I can accuse you of killing my grandma, and then there would be no wrong doing found, doesn't mean you did it.
I agree. People look for drama in their lives and want to attack others the first chance they get regardless if the person is guilty or not. People just desperately want it to be true to get their fix. Society sucks.
Doc is under an NDA after the settlement where he forced Twitch to pay out his contract. He literally can't comment on it. If any illegality had occurred, the NDA is void on it's face.
I mean are you really surprised? This is coming from the same guy who scammed millions of dollars from his fans with his NFT game that is never coming out lmfao
Also, NDAs usually put an absurd price to pay back if you break that NDA. It could easily be 5x as much as what Twitch settled with him in the first place. He's trying to be as vague as possible because he doesn't want to give Twitch any reason to get their money back and more from him. NDA becomes void if it involves a crime, he sued Twitch, and Twitch settled with him. You don't sue a business you're contracted with and win unless they violated something in the agreement they had with you in the first place.
It's almost all the usual suspects that are desperate for clout. It's so stupid. It also seems like everyone just heard this from Cody. Cause Cody has been yapping this same rumor to random people in Rust servers for months.
Kind of crazy how all of these journalists also mentioned that their source was second hand and heard it from another source. Meaning their source didn't have definitive proof to begin with.
Makes me laugh, “Other journalists heard from different SOURCES that it’s true.” They don’t have a f**king clue or source. 😂 My sources tell me that those guys are full of sh*t.
Dr. disrespect, per legal agreement, cannot disclose any details about what occurred, and that includes saying what it wasn't. Ex-twitch employee is vindictive and basically wants to put Doc in a hard place by making it so he can't say anything right, because his legal agreements don't allow it
If it didnt happen it would have nothing to do with his termination, how would there be any legal obligation or NDA for something that didnt happen? And denying an accusation, especially one like that, is not a detail, there is nothing stopping him from saying "I did not sext a minor"
@@tewks4458 Litigation is expensive and arduous even in the most clean-cut of cases. It makes sense for him to not want to entertain such baseless claims too much.
@@lukaswithak4443 "So Doc, somebody approached us claiming you sexted a minor and we're giving you a perma ban." *court case happens* "Well, guess that didn't happen after all, here's your contract money and an NDA to go with it."
He admitted to being a creep and flirting with a minor, but did not cross the line to doing anything illegal. Surely his defenders will not still defend his gross behavior just because he's not in jail. No matter how you feel about twitch personally, they are a company and love money. They were never going to get rid of a big money maker without a good reason, anyone who thought otherwise is ignoring simple logic because they can't face the fact that the person they idolize is not a good person.
My friend got paid out from Blizzard after being banned for something then finding a loophole in their policy. He got paid off and signed a document saying he couldn't talk about it for x amount of years
What a crazy pointless lie to tell... blizz has never paid a user for being banned. Since the creation of the first account on any blizz game they have held the undisputable right to close any account with ZERO reasoning. But drop some more pointless lies in the replies if your bored enough
"I found a loophole in their terms of service, so they paid me 1 million dollars to never say anything" (instead of them just changing their policy) ? bruh
I'm more shocked that some random guy just literally said "he's a pedo" with absolutely no source and EVERYBODY believed him lol. *EDIT* since a lot of you are misunderstanding me. Im NOT taking Docs side. I just prefer to stay 100% neutral unless there is 100% irrefutable evidence that he did text a minor. If that evidence doesn't surface then my views on Doc will not change. I refuse to paint someone as a predator without evidence. We've seen this scenario MANY times. Let's not repeat the same mistake.
@@Autism_moment_of_all_time if they had anything on him it would be posted by now, it will quietly be forgotten. Pathetic by both charlie and his community guessing sht that can destroy a man's life.
That’s how the internet ends up being like, especially TWITTER. Cannot think of anyone that uses that site that isn’t an asylum inmate with 30 minutes of free computer time.
they didnt believe him until Doc's response that didn't deny the allegations... twitch acted preemptively before he did anything wrong, even if he did have sexts and planned to meet with a minor. you dont catch predators based on texts. you wait until they show up. so, legally, he did nothing wrong, so he could try to sue twitch BUT he wont talk about it... He also won't lie about it, it seems, and flat out say that it's not true... so there you have it. With some logic and above room temperature IQ you can assume he possible did these things, but it wasn't illegal, and the legal proceedings keep him from flat out denying it, but also keep TWITCH FROM TALKING ABOUT IT. That's what you all dont realilze. Twitch is the one with the legal muzzle on them, NOT DOC.
It's 2024. Imagine thinking a Twitch employee (former or current) is a trustworthy source of information after all the shite they have pulled over the years. 💀
Twitch has over 1000 employees. You don't think a single one of them is trustworthy because the company of Twitch has done shady things over the years? Okay...
That’s what I’ve been saying! You can’t trust people who hide what was going on there. They knew high up. So yeah there’s some serious dirt going on within that company.
Why would they risk a huge potential defamation case just to thrash dr disrespect ☠️ the reason you probably will never see the evidence is to protect the victim, who tf want to know who's the victim? We might see redacted documents tho, dr disrespect, instead of suing is instead quitting and got thrown off his own company, this whole situation is weird
@@RyuKyu.77you don't have any idea what doc is doing. It took over 7 months for him to sue twitch the first time around when he finally found out what this was about. They looked into this and he was paid his full contract. You can't nda a crime, he's under nda from twitch as part of the suit because twitch fucked up
I definitely don't believe whoever this person is. But I am skeptical because it's very concerning that Doc isn't like pissed and up in arms about such a wild accusation and is weirdly dancing around the question. If someone says that about me I would be furious and immediately go to court for defamation.
@@MrCombs234 well its legalities. One wrong move twitch WILL take legal action. One wrong move, Doc goes to court. Worst case? Both go down. Doc and twitch might get investigated by feds if this shit blows up even more.
90% of people don't believe it. Its just twitter being the loud minority . Im still skeptical that it could be true but not gonna blindly believe he say she say
from what i can see is that the whistle was blown on the doc. they banned his account to do an investigation but that was a jump of the gun. once they found out nothing actually happened and he did nothing wrong it was better to just pay him then go to court for them being sued. he is under NDA still so he cant say everything for the time being since twitch would sue him for defamation (even though they were in the wrong). to be honest he has a right to his privacy for handling this. not EVERYTHING needs to be known by the public. really the person trying to throw shade on the doc should be sued. first off they were an EX EMPLOYEE and second they gave ZERO evidence. also if that did happen then twitch would be in a MOUNTAIN OF TROUBLE since it shows they would be protecting a pedo. because it looks real good to just ban the doc instead of going to the police and giving the evidence. twitch fucked up and jumped the gun. as it is the doc did nothing wrong and was paid out.
@@edr1213doesnt matter cant trust anyone that worked for twitch these days. This guy also just accussed without giving any proof, obviously hes either trying to seek attention or hes has something against doc.
Agreed, i was watching this and thinking.. dude, seriously, did you drop your brain in the bathroom last visit.. very disappointing at the 'school girl gossip' level of dramatising.
What's wild to me is that even though there is ZERO evidence to support this allegation, a ton of people are just automatically assuming guilt. What the hell happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Honestly, I don't think that's been a thing like... ever. At least when talking about opinions outside the justice system, even though the argument can be made it doesn't work so well there either. It's a principle that many of us hold, absolutely. But people have always made assumptions first, usually based on what they want to be the truth, and their confirmation bias gets fed.
no definitely not... also DrChildMolester could at any point just say "no i did not do that" because no NDA could prevent him from saying what he didn't do unless he did do it
@@VoKilla he did not deny doing it... he denied doing any crimes... which plenty of things you can text a minor that could be considered sexting and soliciting sex that would not be crimes... nothing in an NDA can prevent him from denying something that is not part of the NDA... and i doubt randomly an NDA will say "You can't deny trying to diddle a child"
@@resjgamer2378 Saying that color is dependent on light and vision is so obvious to not worth being considered. But as to the actual question implied, it's actually light refracting in the atmosphere, seperating out the waves that exist in the UV and upper visible range (ie violet). So unless you don't consider the atmosphere the sky, for some reason, your only "um actually" opportunity is to say "uhm actually it's mostly violet, not blue" and hope no one asks you for details.
He knows that the *INSTANT* he says "I *NEVER* messaged a minor inappropriately " ......Someone would drop the entire chat log for the world to see.
Lol they got bro on a leash
Yeah check the latest news buddy @@theoguncleslappy9150
Lol this made me remember about the time when i made a fake chat log of one of my classmate in middle school that he did goofy stuff and i trolled him so bad he got clowned for the whole year
@@revilsanjiani146ngl bro that's just evil.
@@revilsanjiani146 Mate that's called bullying
Former paralegal here, there are probably so many restrictions/clauses in the settlement terms that would prevent him from stating much of anything about the entire thing. Some of the things I've read in other settlements are borderline absurd. One that comes to mind prevented the client from even saying the name of the company in question in any form. Shit's crazy.
@exiledmonastic4650 NDAs are completely different from settlements insofar as the binding terms. Depending on the state that the settlement was signed in, they could have outlandish stipulations. TLDR, they most likely can put any stipulations they want in a settlement. "By accepting the settlement, you can not refer nor imply that we are stinky buttholes without having to pay us back plus interest".
Also, I found a different career because the legalese can be extremely difficult and confusing, so I may not be the best person to weigh in on this matter.
@exiledmonastic4650 No problem at all. Always read and re-read anything that is considered legally binding.
@exiledmonastic4650 It reminds me of the old lady burned by McDonald's coffee and suing. Most people assumed she was just a Karen, but no. The poor woman suffered 3rd degree burns from how hot it was. And when she sued, she got her money, but was not allowed to talk about it the rest of her life.
@exiledmonastic4650I have personally signed a settlement that was due to no wrong doing of my own, and yes it's that restrictive. I cannot say their name, I can not confirm or dent anything, I cannot even confirm I recieved the settlement from them
When you said 2020 I deadass thought ‘oh 2 years ago’
me too!
Nah fr tho 😭
@exiledmonastic4650 If im not mistaken time has moved at around 1 year per year
@@orang1921You are mistaken its actually been 6 months per year since 2020
ikrrr 2020 does not feel like 4 whole years ago lol
Drake and Dr. Disrespect collab incoming
😂😂😂😂👌
Is Drake a pedo too?
ft. the Diddler
@@sodiumhydride1 Special Guest EDP
Bro charlie was literally the #1 Doc glazer 😂
Legal NDAs about court settlings can be insane. One of my coworkers who settled with a company over wrongful termination that paid out flat out said the payout settlement agreement prohibits him from discussing anything that happened in the year that lead up to his termination. He cant even mention everyday life at the company.
Edit: also any claims without evidence should be treated with a grain of salt
Claims made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence. Simple as.
NDAs dont cover illegal activities. Any party can come out and say something with no issues of a NDA
DD is still banned from Twitch. So there's a lot of people assuming this ban reason was covered by an NDA with an equal amount of evidence.
Don't grasp how people don't understand how a settlement can turn out. Settlements with major companies usually come paired with a "You can't talk about this with anyone because it could damage our brand and this settlement isn't an admission of guilt from us." tier NDA. Settlements are paid out by huge companies to avoid having their image tarnished and people usually accept them to avoid a super long legal process - as if the Dr. actually stuck to his case, this could STILL very well be going through the court system. The process is also very expensive until a verdict is reached, you're on the hook for your own legal costs until its over assuming you won. Anyone shook by this is uninformed or chasing drama.
@@mutantraze3681 Right, but if what Dr. Disrespect said is true then nothing illegal happened. Someone at Twitch could have made a false accusation that got Doc banned, Doc sues, Twitch settles on the conditions that Doc doesn't appeal his ban and doesn't discuss the events that lead up to the false accusations because that would make Twitch look bad.
I would posit that this is a very likely turn of events because it allows for both Doc and Cody to be telling the truth. Doc _was_ banned for attempting to solicit sex from a minor, but unbeknownst to the people in charge of banning doc, the girl in question wasn't a minor and there is evidence that shows Doc knew she was legal age.
A single tweet with zero evidence has made half of the internet assume guilt. Social media was a mistake
@@deenman23you're the problem and racist
It's the fact that the guy who tweeted it was a twitch employee for like 8 years. It's not some random bozo, and other insiders have sort of been hinting at the same thing. Do you really think this guy would risk a massive defamation lawsuit against himself just for the lols? I'm not saying Dr Disrespect is guilty, but the whole situation is really odd.
@@simplekamiithis. If he never worked for them no one would have looked into this
Yet when there is evidence of wrongdoing, the internet suddenly doesn't care and replys with "It's YOUR fault this happened" to the victim (Logan Paul's cult). Twitter is the mistake, not everyone deserves a voice.
@@simplekamii Working for Twitch is a huge red flag in and of itself. I wouldn't trust a Twitch employee to tell me the time, let alone the truth.
"You either fall off a hero, or you stream long enough to become a moderator"
I don't think critical understands you can't just deny these allegations. Full on denying it has the opposite affect
@@leztyim sorry if im accused of being a predator when im not im absolutely denying it lmfao wtf you talking about???
@@lezty who is your plug bro 😭😭😭😭😭😭
@@EventhorizonShadows He can't deny because of the NDA, if he says that he was not banned because of that he is breaching the NDA, from what I understand.
@@EventhorizonShadows you not a celebrity bro it doesn’t matter for you
Maybe they got it wrong and he was texting a Miner. A guy who works in a mine.
Cobalt miners are built different 😩
@@xdscorpoinz6394cobalt miners are still minors
What happens if the miner is also a minor
@@maiden5427that my good man, is a beautiful thing called child labor
@@maiden5427😨
Personally, I think Doc should've responded by making a song about how he does NOT diddle kids. Give it a catchy hook like "Do not diddle kids, it's no good diddling kids."
This deserves way more likes 🤣
and then copyright claim anyone reacting to it.
There is no quicker way for people to think Doc is diddling kids then by writing a song about it!
Something along the lines of: "I am way to famous to do something like that." or "If I was doing something like that, I would have been caught."
Frank Reynolds would be proud
Me personally, if I was a doctor of disrespect, I wouldn’t take that level of disrespect.
Well he disrespected his wife 6.5 years ago so I dunno...
@@Aethelbeornnice one
@@Aethelbeorn He also disrespected his fans by telling them he's making a game, scamming millions from them, then never releasing it. Just another grifter getting his crypto bag on the back of his fans 🤣
@@yikes710 I always thought the clown costume he always wears was enough to tell me he was always a grifter.
He’s a POS so none of the claims come as surprising
this turned from a mystery to a full-blown conspiracy
ily
@DontReadMyPicture887 IM SORRY
@Soundielolbruh bot game is evolving again.
I was your first like and wondered “why doesn’t this have more likes” then I saw you had 116 like and am now typing this comment
@Soundielolbruh🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖🤖
Grown men stop being inappropriate towards minors challenge (impossible)
LMFAOOOO
friendly fire will not be tolerated
@@Visible_274lol w ratio
Guilty 🙋♂️
Especially when you don't know they're underage since the whisper feature is 18+. Oh.
“He tried to take advantage of a minor, so we did the best thing possible, we didn’t alert the authorities, instead we banned him from twitch and decided to dredge it up years later after any legal action could have been taken”
Well shouldn't this hypothetical person's parents really be the ones to pursue any action? If it were true they would have sued twitch into oblivion loooong ago
i guess it would make sense for Twitch, he was the face of it, it would tarnish twitch forever..
@@kenon6968Parents could not have the money, not be in the picture, or just shitty. No one knows so no assumptions can be made either way. Just have to wait and see if it’s true. Would hope not but at this point I wouldn’t be surprised. 2024 been proving Katt Williams right so far.
It makes sense bc Twitch only found out bc someone at Twitch looked at Doc’s whisper, which is supposed to be “private” so it doesn’t look good for Twitch as well.
@@Goudafortuna sad truth brother
If it wasn't for Charlie I wouldn't know every single crazy shit happened.
NOBODY ASKED MY CONTENT IS WAY BETTER... 🔥🔥
YFGA IS WAY BETTER THAN (TH-camR)...
NOBODY ASKED MY CONTENT IS WAY BETTER... 🔥🔥
YFGA IS WAY BETTER THAN (TH-camR)...
NOBODY ASKED MY CONTENT IS WAY BETTER... 🔥🔥
YFGA IS WAY BETTER THAN (TH-camR)...
NOBODY ASKED MY CONTENT IS WAY BETTER... 🔥🔥
YFGA IS WAY BETTER THAN (TH-camR)...
Actually d riding him
“Elden Ring monday” 💀
Caria Minor 😂
Yeah, only minors use emojis....
@@jantekjantek ok?
@@traktor321😂😂
@@traktor321i can applaud an actually clever comment, no doubt doc will be grooming erm i mean farming there.
I'm just here to see the people who were "waiting for proof" start making excuses now that doc has admitted it himself.
Oh shoot. Links pls
Yeah I just saw he posted on X. (Twitter)
people already coping and 'it's ok when MY streamer is a predator!'
@@aaaaaaaa-gu1md You're absolutely correct. I have just seen a lot of excuses already, which means that a lot of people who said they were waiting for proof actually didn't care whether or not there was inappropriate conduct. I fear that you're one of the few people who approached this situation in a principled manner.
I mean its proof something happened. I'm just still super confused on why Twitch had to pay a settlement to Doc if Doc is the one in the wrong. That little piece of info is making this whole thing confusing.
there is an italian streamer, which only recently has been unbanned that got a "permanent" ban bc he said: "black always loses" in roulette
🤣🤣🤣
non aveva detto "il nero no, il nero deve morire" o una roba del genere?
Yeah, Charlie saying people don’t get permabanned from Twitch often is laughable. There’s a ton of smaller male streamers dealing with unfair permabans, seems he’s very out of touch with how sexist the Twitch moderation team is and forgot the massive banwaves from back in the day
Edit: for the pathetic people asking me for a list, literally all you have to do is check the Twitch subreddit. Not my job to compile a list for you because you're a lazy prick
@@cracovioemanuele8463 Are people so thinned skin they cant hear a color without connecting it to some racial connotation? Is this how we really want to be as people?
@@cracovioemanuele8463ma chi sarebbe quello che l'ha detto poi?
As someone living under a particularly bizarre NDA, I can tell you from experience that NDA's can be weirder than you thought possible. Freedom in 6 months....LOL.
That's rough; I hope everything is going OK for you, and if not then I hope it gets better soon
so, which minor did you get in bed with
Yep. A lot of jobs use NDAs but the people in the jobs I’m familiar with failed talk about what they aren’t supposed to. Word gets around fast and cats are out of the bag but no proof of whodunit since so many talk. All the time.
What happened in that Travelodge *stays* in that travelodge 😠😠
Can u come back in 6 months and let us know lol
I can't stop getting distracted by that flashing claw machine ngl
Same 😂 I want one now
It glares so much 😂
I understand people's concerns over advertising these energy drinks to minors and gamers that most likely sit on their ass all day, but damn that claw machine is rad
i wish i had it 😂
Thank you now i cant unsee it
Bro fuck a zombie apocalypse. This is a PDF File apocalypse 💀
It has always been going on, it's not coincidental that it's all happening now. There's something going on. Illuminati rofl
😭😭😭😭
Osrs this makes the zombie apocalypse look like child’s play
As funny as this comment is this is way too true😭
6’8 + Multimillionaire and he mogs you, you think he cares about losers on the internet? 😂
For those unaware, crimes cannot be covered by an NDA. So even if these acusations were true but nothing ever came of the conversation in question it would still be endangerment of a child (something like that) which is a crime. So most likely Twitch banned him because he was discussing contracts with competitors
There where rumours of doc going to mixer back when mixer was stil active and was following ninja
Wouldn’t it also be considered obstruction of justice or something if Twitch concealed information about a crime committed on their platform?
Why would a company report it? Look it up, Subway knew about Jared's interest in children and didn’t do anything or report it. They came out with a statement after the fact when it came out. Corporations don't have to do anything.
@@BroadBeanSoup no. Obstruction is a specific thing that has to do with stopping a law enforcement agent from doing their job. Failing to report on potential crimes are our prerogative. Now if thy had went out of their way to say suppress the minor from coming forward that might be a form of obstruction. But companies just like people do not actually have to report crimes. It could open them up to being sued but it isn't obstruction.
@@BroadBeanSouptwitch wanted to axe dr disrespect for trying to work a deal with mixer. Easiest way to do that with any employee in any industry is to find a way to fire them with cause and not have to pay them. My guess is they used a loose (possibly even entirely fabricated) incident to cut ties with him, leak it to the media, and hope the doctor would just step away based on the threat of being cancelled. Huge miscalculation by twitch and now they are have been caught in a really bad look. Doc gets paid big in exchange for silence and twitch is saved the embarrassment. Everybody wins and this whole thing could have stayed buried if it wasn’t for one little former twitch employee who needed his 15 seconds of fame on twitter
Doc wasn’t the one being sued, he was suing Twich for the remainder of this contract. Twich paid BUT THEY DIDNT ADMIT wrong doing or were’t found to have unfairly terminated him.
Doc has NEVER SAID HE DIDNT KNOW SHE WAS A MINOR or ever say that he thought she was an adult.
He tried in his first replies to suggest his lawsuit against Twich somehow cleared him of any wrongdoing when it was a civil suit where he wasn’t even the defendant.
The tweet isn’t from some random gossip anon account, it’s from CODY whos a known Verified Twich Partnership Manager. Who was very specific with the allegation that he would have been a first hand source being a Partnership manger at the time. And would obviously know he would get hung in court by Doc for defamation if there wasn’t logs.
IF ANY OF YOU CANT UNDERSTAND WHAT IM SAYING AND ARE READING IN REVERSE. I THINK DOC KNEW HER AGE. AND SEXT HER ANYWAY.
Unfortunately there has been zero evidence given about the situation . So idk why people would believe an ex twitch employee on a “ rumour “.
Why would they pay out the remainder of a contract they terminated prematurely if it wasn't wrong?
@@nick191088 cause it's not a good look to have a pedo on your payroll either. Especially when you gave him access to a messenger app with the ability to text minors
@@nick191088 essentially they settled and used vague language to get out of bad publicity about it, kind of a "it wasnt legal but wasnt wrong for us to do that" type deal, most likely gave him a NDA/Gag order to not speak on it so he could keep the full payout, but now this ex employee wants to try and seemingly force him to talk about it, thus costing him the payout he got
as to why though? well it is an ex twitch employee, they are all pretty fucking dumb/vindictive about pretty much everything
@@nick191088 If the reason they're cutting ties isn't explicitly against the terms of the contract. They could take a moral stand but still owe for the terms of the contract.
He’s probably tied to some wild ass NDA that says he isn’t supposed to talk about it publicly at all
No NDA would stop you from saying you didn't sext a minor if you didn't.
That doesn't change the fact he can say no minors were involved, curious why this hasn't been stated. Hmmmmmm.
Bro also cheated on his wife before with like a 19 or 20yr old soooo he is already a pos that likes em younger
@@oneautumnleaff2119 NDAs can be tough alone, settlements can be borderline insane. I've heard of ones that prevent ever mentioning the company by name for the rest of your life (obviously difficult to prove if you're a private person but in this scenario could happen), otherwise you are liable for breaching the terms of settlement.
@@oneautumnleaff2119 yeah not a comforting response. I hate this man, I love the Doc.
Say drake, I hear you like em young...
Better not go to cell block 1
i think you got confused with the guy he is talking about
What?
*Farming for twitter brownie points starter pack*
-Former employee
-Diddler allegations
-Got from second hand source
-Does not provide further evidence
-Drops mic
*A week later*
-Goes into protected mode
Ya, anything from twitter is 99% bullshit anyway let alone when you tick those boxes
I'd like to see one for rich degenerates that collude to abuse children, seems to be a pattern lately.
defending a predator is wild, why would doc be quiet about it otherwise? he cheated on his wife with an 18 year old and you think him sexually messaging a minor is out of reach... disgusting
the only evidence Cody could bring are the literal chat logs... which he can't legally obtain...
@@Kerttis Do you have any actual evidence of him being a predator? No? Nobody cares then lmao.
As someone who has been tied to multiple NDA's in the past, that's exactly what this sounds like. Someone I worked with came under threat of lawsuit just for finding a new job while under the same NDA, and ended up being fired from his new job. Shit is no joke.
This was my first thought. Kind of didn't know why Charlie didn't think of it either.
@@LonelyGod64you telling me saying “I’m not a pedo” would violate a nda? Texting a minor isn’t illegal technically but it still frowned upon since he never met with them
@@P8nplays It potentially could be if the reason he was permanently banned was actually because of his whispers or even if he were to mention anything about the settlement. He would have to parrot any line his lawyers give him anyways, guilty or not, but NDA keeping his mouth shut makes the most sense for someone like Dr. Disrespect.
It's not like anyone would who wouldn't believe him without saying it would believe him if he said it anyways. I fully believe this is just twitch staff being the same old idiots they usually are.
@@LonelyGod64 IF HE CANT SAY HE DIDNT IT MEANS HE DID USE THE THING INSIDE YOUR HEAD. why would a fucking nda prevent him from being able to deny being a pedo unless he was and did what they said he did.
@@j_f82 I am, that's why I'm not saying someone's a pedophile based on the word of a staff member from a company known to be biased and have innapropriate relationships with streamers. NDAs can block all sorts of things, which is why it's always smart to take your statements regarding anything that might do with them from your lawyer. If Twitch even made an accusation that turned out to be false it could be bound in an NDA to prevent someone from making their image look bad.
Babe wake up new “________ situation is crazy” just dropped
1st time on Earth huh?
we gonna need a part 2 of this after Docs recent tweet
what is it?
@@mahitos_biggest_fan He admitted it
@@mahitos_biggest_fanhe talked to a minor
Just came out
@@mahitos_biggest_fanHe admitted to texting a minor
0:01 Why is this the top comment? Because TH-cam sets comments that have a timestamp that you are at, to the top.
Oh so that’s why lol thx
MF got me dammit lol
Oh cool
Wow
That's silly. It should be in an entirely seperate timestamp section of comments.
The bot problem needs to be fixed
every time i see a comment on a video and i wanna look at the replies for more insight its just 90% bots... its literally ridiculous
Never gonna happen that'd actually benefit the users
@Soundielolbruh you are part of the problem
Is charlie ignoring it or what? He NEVER addressed the bots, and it's grown into to too much.
Nah, they're kinda funny. Always see some dummy responding to them or complaining like it's gonna do something 😂
Anytime a new hot topic comes up, all the journalists, "yeah, i knew that was true, my sources told me that". Vultures
I feel like people with this opinion just follow a lot of shitty content creators.
"Journalists" who withhold potentially fucked up info like this for YEARS should lose all credibility regardless of whether these allegations turn out to be true or not.
i thought the same. a singe drop of blood and they swarm you like sharks
really? Ive never seen that before. Is it specific to gaming journalists?
Yeah you know it’s bullshit when you hear the original information comes from an ex employee
The fact that this never went public can only lead me to believe it was covered up by both parties
no surprise there, people with money and with enough connections, you can hide.
If you accuse someone, you prove it, not the person who was accused.
Exactly, the burden of proof is on the person making the claim.
Otherwise you are at risk of entering a realm where you have to prove the non-existence of something.
@@danielreed5199except the court of public opinion is overflowing with tards and grifters, who subscribe to the opposite in which the accused must prove their innocence.... and try not to remember with horror those same people vote in elections
Exactly, imagine if you could just go around calling people pedophiles and you didn't have to provide proof
something something innocent until proven guilty something something
and yet everyone cheered along with kendrick calling drake a pedo with 0 evidence
the twitch whisper system is reserved for people trying to scam children into giving out their parents credit card info
don’t you think a dm from the #1 streamer on the platform would have been screenshotted? I’m not sure how twitch whisper works tho
Is that so? I do need a new pair of shoes 🤔
And for people to throw insults at you for your comments on the chat
Or doc for being a pedo
@@VileGeedcope harder, dudes a pedo
Why isn't he talking about it? Simple, they reached a court settlement amounting to "Okay, we pay you to make this go away, we don't admit we did anything wrong though. Also, you're not allowed to talk about the details of the case or settlement itself."
Sounds fishy? No, these are pretty bog-standard settlement terms. Neither party "officially" admits wrong-doing but you can tell what's what from which way the money flows. I'd wager he was paid more than his contract was worth in exchange for never speaking of this again.
You cant settle CRIMINAL Cases. Civil cases. Yes. criminal. no.
@@hazeion No criminal case was ever brought. Which isn't shocking, since no evidence was ever brought and no "victim" ever actually came forward.
DrDisrespect sued Twitch for breach of contract.
You can't do that with criminal activity, though.
If you have an NDA that prevents you from "talking about the company in a negative way" but you have knowledge of criminal activity YOU CAN GO TO THE POLICE WITH IT.
If the company tries to execute the NDA, the judge will THROW IT OUT, AND CHARGE THEM WITH WITNESS TAMPERING AND CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY.
@@Null_Experis Yeah, but that's the thing isn't it. All they did was terminate his contract prematurely based on a nasty rumor (presumably to avoid bad PR).
That's just what I'm saying, if Twitch had evidence that DrDisrespect did in fact try to solicit a minor (which they would have, if it took place on their messaging system as the rumor claims), they would NOT have settled the case.
All of it points to the whole root of this story being horseshit. And he got shitcanned for it, so he took Twitch to court and got a massive (undisclosed) payout.
You guys are trying so hard to justify this. In what universe would any settlement term prevent him from simply saying he is not guilty of the sexting charges. This isn't info of the case at all, especially if he really wasn't sexting.
Charlie was saying on stream that there's no way Dr. Kidinspect's wife would stay with him if she knew about these allegations, but I think it's very believable when you remember that he brings in millions of dollars to their family. A lot of people would be okay with it if it means they get to keep a comfortable lifestyle.
If a person is capable of lying to their spouse, they're capable of lying to anybody. It would not surprise me if there's (at least) some truth to the allegations. It may not have been criminal, but something went on. Twitch are not dumb; They're losing millions by not having him on the platform.
@@chuckp342 yeah exactly. They wouldn't have let him go in the way that they did unless it was something like this. Plus as my grandma used to say 'once a cheater always a cheater'
@@baphomette3234 One thing I've not seen mentioned is the age of consent in a lot of states (e.g. not illegal). To me, a minor means under 18.
I'm not saying the guy did or didn't do anything, but when you're a celebrity of his caliber, you have to be careful. Innocent chats could be turned against you easily. Hell, his audience is probably half minors.
It was true😞
Kidinspect caught me dead 🤣
remember, HR exists to protect the company, not people!
You’re falling the HR bad narrative put out there by big business. HR is human resource, and are literally there to protect the employees. In most companies HR operates in its own org chart, and isn’t beholden to upper management, but instead is the only thing above upper management. Thus upper management wants you to hate hr. They make you think HR is only there to tell you can’t call people names. When in reality they’re telling management you can’t do mandatory OT, it’s bad for the employee. You can’t take benefits away it’s bad for the employee, and will hurt productivity.
@@thekurtrussell4007this is bs, the most disgusting people I've ever dealt with in my life was HR. Like, never been late once and barely ever took a vacation style my parents house burnt down and I had to take off to help them and the company attacked me and HR did nothing, I failed a breathalyzer test for work and it was proven it was low blood sugar, there was no alcohol in my piss, they said they already filled out the paperwork so kick rocks. Fuck HR. And piss off defending them.
@@thekurtrussell4007sure doesn't feel like that when it's full of women gossiping. I doubt a majority of straight men work in HR
@@thekurtrussell4007 Yeah that's some bullshit. Every company I've worked HR is a massive asshole. Like the one in the last place I worked was perfectly fine with upper management cussing us out in front of patrons. When employees became friends, she would tell us about how unionizing is bad for the place as a whole, and management isn't happy about us being friends (even though we didn't have a union). She would also talk about how being paid $8 (I was a much higher position than floor, so I received more but others didn't) an hour is a good wage, and said we're lucky to be working at this place.
The state even came in since it was a pseudi-government position and she defended the low wages. One time she talked a Jewish employee out of suing the company after the Director in charge threatened to fire the lady over her not eating pork and not attending a Christmas party.
HR does not care about the employee. They only exist for the company.
@@rpsycoso you’re worked at like less than 5 companies and now know that every HR person in the world is a huge asshole
there’s probably an agreement between doc and twitch stating he can not state details of his case nor make disparaging comments towards the platform
EDIT/UPDATE: nvm doc is a cradle robber
Purple snakes
If he was innocent he would never enter such an agreement.
@@rojavabashur6455 he's just a man at the end of the day.
nah, just read between the lines : no wrongdoing, everything has been settled = come on guys, I didn't sleep with her, twitch had to pay me full to just f*ck off so it doesn't make any waves.
@@rojavabashur6455or he got paid a lot of money
10 years ago: "we need evidence to believe"
2024: "Twitter is the source"
Yeah not like he isn't known for being a piece of shit or anything LMAO or not like the twitch employee was an account excuetive
What the sigma
I had up to like.. eight thoughts about you last night man. I can't stop thinking of you, Skizzy.
Silence conservative your anti woke videos are cringe and grifty
@@IsmailofeRegimethat's some circular logic you've come up with there.
So far, my mistrust of a man with a mullet, real, (or cheap wig) has never led me astray.
What about Chuck Norris when he was rocking a mullet in The Hitman?
Unfortunately, you'll probably have a hard time trusting some Australians, New Zealanders, Tongans, Samoans, Fijians, some other Polynesians, rugby players, dykes, and any time travelers from the 80's
even theo von?
what about boomgonza? dude's wholesome
What about oompaville?
The burden of proof here is not on Dr disrespect. The accusing party is since the evidence shown is hersay at the moment.
@Soundielolbruh lmao the best joke I've read all year 🤣
Yeah but he could just say he didn't do that lol
@@SquishyTheVampirethat's a bot
True that
@@watchmehope6560no I don’t think that one is a bot, I’ve seen him make real comments.
In my honest opinion, if this is true then this makes Twitch look just as awful for not reporting Doctor Disrespect to the cops.
Considering they paid him out, the likelihood that there was no wrong doing is high, especially since you can't NDA a crime.
@DabDabGoose Yeah. Unless there is something I'm not understanding here.
This is either a massive cover up and a lot of people are getting in trouble for illegally hiding a crime. Or a lot of people are getting sued for defamation and libel
@@DabDabGoosehe sued twitch
I think it's just as simple as Twitch being a bunch of babies and hypocrites. Not that I like the doc a lot but it's strill true.
@@DabDabGoose A pedophile can talk to and groom children without it immediately being a crime. In fact, that's most of what a pedophile does!
Elden Ring Monday as the ending message is wicked work 💀💀
Oof the reactions protecting Doc didn’t age well.
@Sofus-fu4rothere is no way they could have known back then.
@Sofus-fu4ro here's one of the comments in his defense 2 days ago
"That allegation, without proof, is hearsay. Dr. Disrespect not acknowledging it and saying he did nothing illegal is the best way to go about it by dismissing the claim while skirting any NDA."
They're not defending what he did to the minor, they're not saying pedophilia should be allowed, they're not saying any of that, they're simply saying he approached it in a very professional manner, and that its the best possible approach.
So no... There is no way they could've known, because if you read the comment, they weren't even defending what he did, but how he approached it.
@Sofus-fu4roit’s part of the red pill society’s line of thinking.
@@ki5895 The man cheated on his wife multiple times with girls far younger than his wife, this is common knowledge yet streamers were defending him.
what about reactions that are against someone who is later proven innocent?
Everyone was saying there was no proof so they don't believe it, it wasn't a defence against Doc, but a defence of "innocent until proven guilty"
I refuse to assume anything without lack of information and evidence
Testimony is evidence.
@@ethandubois7536 can be lie
Same
@@ethandubois7536 no it isnt lmfao
@@ethandubois7536I would like to formally come forward with information that ethandubois7536 raped me last night. And since testimony is law, we need to take him to jail IMMEDIATELY
Nobody:
Charlie every week:
"(Fill in the blank) situation is crazy"
“Claims without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.”
but they still have a forever lasting affect unfortunately even if the claimant were to say he was lying.. this would still have a huge affect on his life.
@@darthasavage7213 sadly thats the point its just a EX employee randomly saying it without any proof. People really wanna believe twitch paid to cover up a child SA issue its legit braiddead
he didn't deny it though
@@darthasavage7213 which opens the person lying and claiming to a defamation case.
@@darthasavage7213defaming to a degree, true. But if you can find the person who first started this rumor, they can be sued for defamation if the claim has no backing to it.
Chris Hansen wants Dr Disrespect to have a seat.
As the CEO of the flavored toilet paper company, how dare you Charlie.
Flavour toilet paper?
I need suma that shit rn
I always thought that flavored toilet paper was made to make ass eating not taste like shit
Will you guys be releasing the Baja blast flavor anytime soon, asking for a friend
@@dumflamesaid the toilet paper
thank you kind sir for what you do for the ass eating community 😢
Allegations in the absence of evidence should be met with severe skepticism
the original allegations were easily ignorable
but the good doc's response is MUCH more sussy
@the_zeta_male
you mean the response where he said he didn't do anything?
gtfo out of here with that "sussy" bs.
@@The_Zeta_Male Not really even if you settle out of court yada yada you get slammed with a bunch of "okay now dont talk about this this this or this. k thanks."
@@BigHailFan lmao. he can say he "didn't do anything" but can't deny that he didn't that specific thing he's being accused of. okay
cope harder
@@The_Zeta_Male saying "i didn't do it" is literally denying it, you sub-species.
I could not handle being a well-known individual on the internet nowadays. It's so easy for some random to just blurt out something without proof that will put pressure on you, even if you haven't done anything wrong.
It's like being a lonely woman in the late 1500's, and some guy shouts "witch!", and you got the whole village coming after you
Its why hot topics should be more transparent. If you arent transparent then conspiracies take over. Doc just needs to reveal why he was banned
@@lovedeepsandhu8502it's probably illegal for him to even discuss it
Reminds me of the mew2king situation. Same thing happened and he blatantly laid it out like “it’s literally impossible”
FR. I like being able to walk around in public with nobody knowing who I am or saying things behind my back. Living like that would make me age faster from the stress alone. If I was famous then all the privacy I would of gotten if people did not know or care who I am would be gone.
it’s more so that e celebs don’t view themselves as full fledged celebrities with everyone paying attention to them, so they don’t expect to get caught doing bad things, most of these e celebs are straight up evil
Doc just admitted on a Twitter post two hours ago. About him talking to a minor
he said it was nothing illegal tho but idk
Was that ever in question? He also said he never met her, no pictures were sent, and did not know she was a minor at the time. So what’s your point?
@@jaimestardust8555 that doesn't matter? He admitted they were inappropriate conversations, he admitted they were a minor. That's it, he's a bad person because of that.
@@jaimestardust8555He did not say that he wasn’t aware that they were a minor.
@@st4trips639 I'm not a fan of Dr Disrespect, but if he was unaware the person was a minor, that absolutely matters, what are you talking about, you have to be a kid, or your a Marxist living by the Marxist motto, "Guilty until proven innocent", now if he did know they were a teenager, then that is absolutely despicable, but as of now, it's not known, and he very well could of thought they were of age, after all, some Teens will over state their age for such and such reason, even tho it's rare it does happen, now it's harmless but for example, I did it to play Pot Farm Back in the day, if theirs a lesson to be learned here it is, don't just talk to anyone on the internet, and if you don't know them make sure who tf your talking to is an adult, doing a bit of research isn't hard, and it's not difficult to wait to assume or draw a full conclusion, untill more details come out, cause as of now things aren't all that clear, Innocent untill proven guilty
In my opinion, an ex twitch employee saying it, and then all of the sudden a bunch of other people "heard a similar story" holds no water. This is like blindly believing all of the negative things someone says about their ex after a bad breakup. There is bad blood. There may even be personal drama. Maybe He just doesn't like the Doc. A lot of people don't. A lot of people would love to see him be taken down. As far as I'm concerned, he is innocent until there is proof. The fact he was also never in legal trouble says a lot too. His name is out there and all that would be public record.
He says an awful lot about LGBT and grooming. Another case of projection being a confession.
but he hasn’t said he hasn’t done it which is weird. if he hasn’t done it why doesn’t he just say that. he is dodging the question which makes him look guilty which he probably is
@@imapug_playz2907why bother denying what is a completely ridiculous accusation
@@imapug_playz2907 go finish school
@@imapug_playz2907 if twitch forced an NDA for the payout he got then legally he cant give details on it, even if its squashing rumors because that would be giving details by denial
remember he was shown that he wasnt terminated for any illegal action when he got the payout, if they had any sort of evidence about sexting a minor he most certainly wouldnt have been given a payout at all
and before anyone claims they could have been covering it up ... that would make Twitch as a company a cohort to a crime, and fuck them over WAY harder then you would believe
I don’t think Charlie has ever settled or received a settlement.
To this day, 2 years later, I am still contractually obligated to never talk about what I did at my last job or risk losing my settlement.
Just in case I haven’t told anyone. Only my wife knows.
i’ll give you 13 dollars if you tell me what you did right now
@@shaboingboing1 Lol it was a government job but it’s what I actually did and saw in there I can’t talk about.
Idk how far the government would go so I won’t risk it. They’re probably reading this right now lol.
It’s not too crazy tho just some government bs.
I’m not kidding
Now you cant tell me the illuminati dont exist
Does that entail that you are not allowed to say that you did not do pdf stuff?
the internet not understanding how actual business, contracts, or law works
you not doing anything to change that image
The massive digital conscious when koalakakes says they should've popped out of the womb with a law degree
yeah cause your american ass is only youtube media
@@zwenkwiel816 lol whats that even supposed to mean
@@The_GeniMeans he’s just critiquing the phenomenon instead of changing it and the guy is basically equating that lack of action as equally negative, which is honestly not a crazy counter.
Who tf bought the monthly subscription where every month we get a new predator
"Legal obligations" could literally be an NDA saying you cannot talk about anything specific pertaining to the ban or you owe us all of the money back.
that's what I thought too lol
Very true. That’s what I’ve been thinking about this whole time. I can’t believe I beat the bots to your comment.
Unless he WAS banned for sexting a minor, that wouldn’t be covered under that NDA.
well yea, cuz if you say all the things that didn't get you ban, then thing you don't say IS the reason.
@@ovalfps if he was banned for that, he wouldn't tell either way
That allegation, without proof, is hearsay. Dr. Disrespect not acknowledging it and saying he did nothing illegal is the best way to go about it by dismissing the claim while skirting any NDA.
Maybe if you’re a kid
@@g-g43 or maybe if you know how the legal system works, this happens in most cases of such nature, where a company messes up and settles by paying rather than public backlash - considering how big and loyal some Doc fans are, it makes sense they slapped an NDA on the paycheck so that they don't get their wrath.
@@vKrossbut why would they ban him if he didn’t do anything
@@redb8053 Because private companies have the right to ban someone at their discretion. If it is justified or not doesn't really matter to indicate if someone did something illegal or not.
But he literally didn't say that he didn't do anything illegal, lmao. He said it wasn't acknowledged.
As said in numerous videos on this subject: "Trust me, bro" is NOT good enough.
This is 100% a crappy revenge plot.
nah
Maybe but if he can’t just deny it and dances around it then there’s some truth there
smells like a gay legal maneuver where a company filled with ideologues like Twitch holds someone's tongue with an NDA, then gets one of their ex employees to deliver the slander.
"Don't look at our degen booba business model of luring minors to our creator's OnlyFans, look at how much me care about minors in this imaginary Doc Disrespect scenario"
@@abelm935you people who are trying to use this logic really need to learn what an nda is
@@hemipenes As someone under an NDA, there is no NDA in America that would restrict you from denying responsibility for crimes you didn't commit, only crimes that you have committed or crimes in the vein of the crime you've committed. The bare minimum requirements not being met either means he's a) being oddly evasive for a straightforward question for no discernable reason, or b) he's done something similar to what is being alleged and the NDA he's signed prevents him from speaking about it.
He admitted to it today..😬
@abdoulm.sorofino2642you left out where he said “ leaned inappropriate , but it’s whatever I guess Elden ring monday.
@abdoulm.sorofino2642 brother what the fuck you on about
The fuck are you talking about? Dude is 42. What could he and a minor possobly have to discuss? @abdoulm.sorofino2642
@abdoulm.sorofino2642😭 what the hell lol
@abdoulm.sorofino2642it’s odd for sure. But let’s not act like he wasn’t inappropriately messaging a child. Bend it whatever way you want you’re idol has already admitted to being a scumbag
Twitter journalists:
“Tweets are credible sources 🤓”
Yeah, because it's a tweet from a former senior accounts lead at twitch. We've also had other streamers say they've heard the same thing. I hate this dumb BS of "We need DNA evidence and camera footage to prove anything happened". That has never been the case.
@@kreutzz1937 there have been plenty of cases of multiple people accusing someone of something and theyre eventually proven innocent
@@kreutzz1937 🤣Thankfully (usually) we do need proof of things and not just word of mouth by people that aren't thinking properly like you.
@@kreutzz1937🤓🤓🤓🤓
@@Sora-o I never said no proof was needed to find someone guilty but most criminal cases never even have the kind of "proof" you kids yap about. Most is circumstantial and most adults with functioning brains can put two and two together.
sexting a minor would be a crime, there would be no way in twitch would pay that out, and it would have been easily proved in discovery. baseless accusations imo.
Yeah they went to court, he would have had to register as a sex offender. You can’t hide that lol
The minor would have been exposed doc keep that in mind also remember the pro jarded situation. Let's go do doc like that just to look stupid at the end
If the victim's family never presses charges in exchange for money where is the crime?
Welcome to America, is this your first day here?
@JohnnyKinghuffer what
Maybe it was proven in discovery. You saw exactly zero documents from that lawsuit so why pretend something would have changed if it was there.
It really feels like people drop like “it’s cuz he’s a pedo” just so they can get the actual story they want so badly because it forces an explanation
Who thought Charlie's community actually was this terrible? Calling people pedos without literally any proof at all. yikes.
@@Jayden1766-b7o The thing is dr disrespect came out to this rumor and said “no wrongdoing was acknowledged” which is the MOST SUS thing to say when asked about sexting a minor
@oogskskfn it is because the nda he has with twitch
@@oogskskfn and you really think Twitch rather pay to cover up any wrong doing on both ends over you know voiding his payout for committing a crime on their platform? Ipad kids are beyond brainrotted.
@@oogskskfn Good thing he also said nothing illegal happened, which sexting a minor is. Stop ignoring what else he said to fill your bias.
i feel so bad for anyone who has to be texted like this. when i was 11-12 i went through the exact same and was manipulated into sexting an much older man (whom i thought was my age) on a app i had hidden, skype. i’m so glad my mother and father found out before it escalated
An archaic and poorly monitored messaging service is a perfect place for that behavior.
We have found the diddy of the comment section
Bullied emo version of drama alert rotting your brain
@@mojojojo6400 What? He's just saying that the messaging service was likely chosen by Dr. Disrespect because it wasn't well monitored. They aren't defending the action or saying other people should do it. You do understand that, right?
@@dank-n-clips Nah, you just lack reading comprehension.
Apparently it was monitored well if this is true?
If there's anything I learned about internet drama is this. Don't trust anything that comes from a former employee with no proof.
If he texted minors through the whisper system, there's breadcrumbs in the system and twitch had no reason to settle.
On the other hand, something unmistakenly fishy must've happened for twitch to have pulled the perma trigger without a care and fishy enough for twitch to prefer settling the case and die on that hill than unbanning him.
Either way, either bring the evidence or stop with the "I heard this guy did this and that".
Refunding subs doesn't just take money away from Dr disrespect, it's money directly out of twitch's pocket, a lot of it. Twitch is run by amazon and has never been a big earner for them, something amazon hates. the only way they'd willing give back that much money to the public is if that money was going directly to a child predator under investigation, something that could get them legally fucked up and in a PR nightmare. Even rape allegations or sexual assault aren't treated as severe, pedos are simply in a league of their own, a universal evil.
I think he was “smart” enough to not get caught red handed. Was probably setting up some grooming situation. Legally speaking, he did nothing wrong, but morally hes guilty. They are all working a coverup. They paid him to pay the victim so everyone goes on “happily ever after”
If he was talking to a minor like that twitch would've reported him to the police. Not just ended the contract and then later admit fault and pay up. I can't believe anyone ever thought that accusation had merit. I think Charlie has personally had a direct effect on dumbing down gen z people. The kids who have watched his videos over the past few years have suffered brain rot listening to him give so many illogical takes. I watch him because he's funny but his inability to think properly has gotten worse and worse over the years
The guy filmed minors in a public bathroom. I don’t think I really care if there is evidence for this, he’s already a disgusting creep.
Its a current employee who said the tweet lol
And that tweet was liked by several other twitch employees
That man is so cooked it's not even funny and I hope this is finally the end for Doc
I want every person accused of something heinous end their official statement with “Elden Ring Monday.”
Elden Ring is overrated
@@SSJG2so is Dragonball, but you still picked the reference for your name.
@@SSJG2 no it isnt
@@SomaCruz500You take that back right now. Having peak fiction as your pfp doesn’t give you the right to slander my baby!
@@RIP_ZYZZ1738 "peak fiction" and "my baby" tells me all I need to know
Can't wait for the follow up video
„He made a tweet without evidence but then more people made tweets without evidence so it could be true.“
Gotta disagree with this one Charlie. If we go by that logic then yes everything could be technically true.
I mean, with the number of big influencers being outed as predators, this is hardly surprising, but more evidence is definitely needed.
All I'm saying, justice for Johnny Depp
@@intoodeep_Offical we gotta look at the people being outed as predators.. are they multi millionaires with a wife and a kid ? i dont think so..
The only evidence could be screenshots of the dms and sharing someones dms would obvs be against twitch policies regardless of the situation. Why would so many people come out and tell the exact same lie about a person? Youre being way too charitable to him maybe think about the victim instead of your streamer
He never says this in the video though? He specifically says that it's more likely a contract dispute. Did you only watch the first 2 minutes?
"I didnt do anything wrong" is as direct as possible.
he said "no wrongdoing was acknowledged" which is not the same. you are hearing what you wanna hear
@@gubberfuck He said both in two different tweets.
You can have a conversation with minors and not be illegal but looked down upon. You can send a winky face to a minor and thats not illegal but most adults would say its inappropriate. Why cant he say my ban had NOTHING to do with minors instead of i didn't do anything wrong or illegal 🤔🤔
@@kevinvazquez8829 because it could have been a bait account to get a payout. Nothing illegal. Nothing wrong. Still correlated.
If you believe someone with his fame and exposure would do something so stupid on twitch chat then I am not surprised you believe everything that is said on twitter. Out of curiosity, how many times have you handed bank details to "girls in your area looking for fun" 😂😉
Apparently the Dr Disrespect situation is crazy
Really? That’s crazyyyy!
no way
Sigma
That’s kinda crazy
I hate you. I hate you more than Kendrick hates Drake.
hearing the "two time" just hits different now
It's obvious Twitch lost the suit, settled, payed him, and he cannot say what happened by court order. So people need to stop pretending they know
how is it obvious? we literally know nothing either which way , so take your own advice
@@kingkunta3753 Doc got his money and signed an NDR, thats information we have. If Twitch won they wouldn't pay so they either lost or settled, since the Doc signed an NDA it was almost definitely settled. We can't with 100% certainty but its pretty darn close.
Says the guy pretending to know
@@kingkunta3753bro are you 9 or just so dumb you don’t understand how the law works?
@theoriginalemim Jesus Christ it's public record that this happened. Look it up
One additional unanswered question:
"Who lets the dogs out?"
followed by "Who will stop the rain?"
Who.. who who who
Who killed Captain Alex?
Also "but who was phone?"
or even better "what the dog doin"
The craziest thing to out of this is everyone is quick to jump and cancel the Doc over allegations yet, U.S. politicians who have been caught in the process get off skrt free without any repercussions.
This is so important. We're more worried about a streamer than the people running the country. This is exactly what they want and exactly why they keep getting away with it.
i promise you the government did not plan this lmao
@@fash1on826 The american government couldn't plan a relief correctly but made sure to get a photograph of the president throwing paper towels
It's not exactly an allegation when Dr Disrespect himself acknowledges that it happened.
@@strangerinastrangeland3613 idk where you got that information. His tweet was formed in a way where he avoided directly addressing the allegations and framed it as if he went through the process and no wrongdoing was committed and was paid out in full. Regardless I wish they had this energy for people that actually have undisputed public evidence like every one that Epstein list.
Told you losers he did it. Wanna know what gave it away?? When doc didn’t reply back immediately that he was suing him for defamation…
How old was she?
@@bloozism under 18 obviously. That’s the definition of a minor. Someone under the age of legal responsibility. I.e. 18
@@joshcantrell8397yeah but it does vary in different states
Stop coping he admitted it himself
Came back just to tell em I told ya so😂 love to see it
I've been through the legal system before, and as far as his "talking around things rather than flat-out saying he didn't do it" goes... I'm getting a giant whiff of "My lawyer advised me to never EVER talk about this."
Their first and most valuable advice as STFU, words to live by
@@kenon6968
If only Trump listened...
it is literally the first rule of ANY legal dispute: Shut the fuck up and let the lawyer handle it.
@@fluidthought42Trump 2024 ooh rah 🙏
@@thepoeticdistress_8713 And make everyone's lives worse via Project 2025? Eh, naw.
I'm more surprised that some "journalists" knew about this and stayed silent about it for years.
It depends on the context of how they received their information.
Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if there were grounds to sue the twitch employee who made the tweet for defamation.
As a journalist, you can get these stories all day long but unless it's backed with actual proof, you're risking defamation for yourself and your news publication.
I'm guessing there is just very little viewable evidence of the situation. Either because it didn't happen (In Doc's defense) or it's sealed behind NDAs/court restrictions (In the accuser's defense)
Because it's a big "nothing". They would cancel the doc as fast as possible if they could, but they have nothing on him. Nothing. He sometimes get donos from depressed/suicid*l people, and he gives some of the warmest response you could imagine. It wouldn't surprise me if he alone has prevented many suici..s
Sad to see Charlie's community be so toxic to a fellow content creator
there's a real moral grey area about it, because if they reported on what happened, people wouldn't believe it until the logs got released, and if the logs get released, then some internet weirdos will absolutely try to track down the person doc was texting
@@Jayden1766-b7oI hate people defending potential pedophiles as a witch hunt when we don’t know shit. Don’t be on some weird ass shit
@@Jayden1766-b7oA lot of creators help suicidal people, that doesn’t protect them from wrongdoings.
No wrong doing found.
That's important. Details often confuse people, who, as the internet does, then take the worst selection of details in order to dunk, harass, demonized, etc. the target.
No wrong doing found is perhaps the most important detail and people don't like it because they want to juice it up.
P3do lover
@@VioletElite4 Yeah no shit, if something doesn't exist you can't find it. I can accuse you of killing my grandma, and then there would be no wrong doing found, doesn't mean you did it.
I agree. People look for drama in their lives and want to attack others the first chance they get regardless if the person is guilty or not. People just desperately want it to be true to get their fix. Society sucks.
No wrong doing ACKNOWLEDGED is what he said. Not "found." No wrongdoing acknowledged is PR/lawyer speak for "It did happen but we cut a deal."
@@Somtaaw7 3:12 it literally says “no wrongdoing was found”
Lol
"why am I so short" that caught me off guard 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Doc is under an NDA after the settlement where he forced Twitch to pay out his contract. He literally can't comment on it. If any illegality had occurred, the NDA is void on it's face.
Facts! I’m glad there’re some ppl with a brain still out here 😂
Right? Idk what is so hard to understand, it feels like Charlie is outta pocket and just feeding the fire of the rumours.
For real, I don't believe it without more evidence, but the NDA defense is so desperate and not how it works
I mean are you really surprised? This is coming from the same guy who scammed millions of dollars from his fans with his NFT game that is never coming out lmfao
Also, NDAs usually put an absurd price to pay back if you break that NDA. It could easily be 5x as much as what Twitch settled with him in the first place. He's trying to be as vague as possible because he doesn't want to give Twitch any reason to get their money back and more from him. NDA becomes void if it involves a crime, he sued Twitch, and Twitch settled with him. You don't sue a business you're contracted with and win unless they violated something in the agreement they had with you in the first place.
Of course "multiple *other* journalists" come out of the corners to silently nod in agreement. Good fuckin' grief.
Yeah, how else are they going to gain traction during a time when their reporting can make them money for such a large story like this?
It's almost all the usual suspects that are desperate for clout. It's so stupid. It also seems like everyone just heard this from Cody. Cause Cody has been yapping this same rumor to random people in Rust servers for months.
Kind of crazy how all of these journalists also mentioned that their source was second hand and heard it from another source. Meaning their source didn't have definitive proof to begin with.
probably all share a source directly or indirectly.
Makes me laugh, “Other journalists heard from different SOURCES that it’s true.” They don’t have a f**king clue or source. 😂 My sources tell me that those guys are full of sh*t.
Dr. disrespect, per legal agreement, cannot disclose any details about what occurred, and that includes saying what it wasn't. Ex-twitch employee is vindictive and basically wants to put Doc in a hard place by making it so he can't say anything right, because his legal agreements don't allow it
If it didnt happen it would have nothing to do with his termination, how would there be any legal obligation or NDA for something that didnt happen? And denying an accusation, especially one like that, is not a detail, there is nothing stopping him from saying "I did not sext a minor"
If that's the case Doc could sue for libel.
I didn't know it included what it wasn't.
But that makes sense I suppose.
@@tewks4458 Litigation is expensive and arduous even in the most clean-cut of cases. It makes sense for him to not want to entertain such baseless claims too much.
@@lukaswithak4443 "So Doc, somebody approached us claiming you sexted a minor and we're giving you a perma ban."
*court case happens*
"Well, guess that didn't happen after all, here's your contract money and an NDA to go with it."
He admitted to being a creep and flirting with a minor, but did not cross the line to doing anything illegal. Surely his defenders will not still defend his gross behavior just because he's not in jail.
No matter how you feel about twitch personally, they are a company and love money. They were never going to get rid of a big money maker without a good reason, anyone who thought otherwise is ignoring simple logic because they can't face the fact that the person they idolize is not a good person.
a doctor disrespecting a minor was the most mind boggling thing i have ever seen this week
My friend got paid out from Blizzard after being banned for something then finding a loophole in their policy. He got paid off and signed a document saying he couldn't talk about it for x amount of years
What a crazy pointless lie to tell... blizz has never paid a user for being banned. Since the creation of the first account on any blizz game they have held the undisputable right to close any account with ZERO reasoning. But drop some more pointless lies in the replies if your bored enough
@@JosephSeed. How could you know for sure?
Your friend is a liar and you're an idiot for believing them
"I found a loophole in their terms of service, so they paid me 1 million dollars to never say anything" (instead of them just changing their policy) ? bruh
@@queuebe4068lmao you bums are trying so hard to defend the predator.
I'm more shocked that some random guy just literally said "he's a pedo" with absolutely no source and EVERYBODY believed him lol.
*EDIT* since a lot of you are misunderstanding me. Im NOT taking Docs side. I just prefer to stay 100% neutral unless there is 100% irrefutable evidence that he did text a minor. If that evidence doesn't surface then my views on Doc will not change. I refuse to paint someone as a predator without evidence. We've seen this scenario MANY times. Let's not repeat the same mistake.
That sadly turned out to be Charlie's community's true colors.
We will see if it's true
@@Autism_moment_of_all_time if they had anything on him it would be posted by now, it will quietly be forgotten. Pathetic by both charlie and his community guessing sht that can destroy a man's life.
That’s how the internet ends up being like, especially TWITTER. Cannot think of anyone that uses that site that isn’t an asylum inmate with 30 minutes of free computer time.
they didnt believe him until Doc's response that didn't deny the allegations... twitch acted preemptively before he did anything wrong, even if he did have sexts and planned to meet with a minor. you dont catch predators based on texts. you wait until they show up. so, legally, he did nothing wrong, so he could try to sue twitch BUT he wont talk about it... He also won't lie about it, it seems, and flat out say that it's not true... so there you have it. With some logic and above room temperature IQ you can assume he possible did these things, but it wasn't illegal, and the legal proceedings keep him from flat out denying it, but also keep TWITCH FROM TALKING ABOUT IT. That's what you all dont realilze. Twitch is the one with the legal muzzle on them, NOT DOC.
It's 2024. Imagine thinking a Twitch employee (former or current) is a trustworthy source of information after all the shite they have pulled over the years. 💀
Twitch has over 1000 employees. You don't think a single one of them is trustworthy because the company of Twitch has done shady things over the years? Okay...
That’s what I’ve been saying! You can’t trust people who hide what was going on there. They knew high up. So yeah there’s some serious dirt going on within that company.
Why would they risk a huge potential defamation case just to thrash dr disrespect ☠️ the reason you probably will never see the evidence is to protect the victim, who tf want to know who's the victim? We might see redacted documents tho, dr disrespect, instead of suing is instead quitting and got thrown off his own company, this whole situation is weird
Or basically any journalist for that matter.
@@RyuKyu.77you don't have any idea what doc is doing. It took over 7 months for him to sue twitch the first time around when he finally found out what this was about. They looked into this and he was paid his full contract. You can't nda a crime, he's under nda from twitch as part of the suit because twitch fucked up
and we're supposed to believe this *former* twitch employee with no proof or evidence?
I definitely don't believe whoever this person is. But I am skeptical because it's very concerning that Doc isn't like pissed and up in arms about such a wild accusation and is weirdly dancing around the question. If someone says that about me I would be furious and immediately go to court for defamation.
@@MrCombs234 well its legalities. One wrong move twitch WILL take legal action. One wrong move, Doc goes to court. Worst case? Both go down. Doc and twitch might get investigated by feds if this shit blows up even more.
90% of people don't believe it. Its just twitter being the loud minority . Im still skeptical that it could be true but not gonna blindly believe he say she say
Charlie shouldnt even have made this video only to stir up negativity and hate, without any proof at all.
Men bad right?
from what i can see is that the whistle was blown on the doc. they banned his account to do an investigation but that was a jump of the gun. once they found out nothing actually happened and he did nothing wrong it was better to just pay him then go to court for them being sued. he is under NDA still so he cant say everything for the time being since twitch would sue him for defamation (even though they were in the wrong).
to be honest he has a right to his privacy for handling this. not EVERYTHING needs to be known by the public. really the person trying to throw shade on the doc should be sued. first off they were an EX EMPLOYEE and second they gave ZERO evidence. also if that did happen then twitch would be in a MOUNTAIN OF TROUBLE since it shows they would be protecting a pedo. because it looks real good to just ban the doc instead of going to the police and giving the evidence.
twitch fucked up and jumped the gun. as it is the doc did nothing wrong and was paid out.
but he might be pedo, regardless evidence. legal doesnt make sense. pedo makes sense.
Cope
@@julianh0990Really? With that logic anyone can be anything because apparently proof doesn't matter.
Incredible how people say wait for real proof while you try to say what happened like u were there. Cringe
what evidence would they give if it’s a legal case, and sexual based crimes historically can be hard to find evidence to
4 years and not a single shred of evidence and came from a FORMER employee come on charlie
yea i think this is all a pitchfork hunt where some1 has it out for doctor and are trying to pin the worst kind of accusation you can on him.
Former Twitch director of strategic partnerships Cody Conners. The guy who leaked this wasn't some random no name twitch staff member.
@@edr1213 appeal to authority is literally a fallacy they taught me about in high school, this isnt the strong argument you think it is
@@edr1213doesnt matter cant trust anyone that worked for twitch these days. This guy also just accussed without giving any proof, obviously hes either trying to seek attention or hes has something against doc.
Agreed, i was watching this and thinking.. dude, seriously, did you drop your brain in the bathroom last visit.. very disappointing at the 'school girl gossip' level of dramatising.
Doc went from docx file to PDF FILE in matter of seconds
Creativity there well done
What's wild to me is that even though there is ZERO evidence to support this allegation, a ton of people are just automatically assuming guilt. What the hell happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Do you even live in America? This comment either means you don't, or you're woefully ignorant.
drama is more profitable than innocence
I think it's kind of like those conspiracy theories. some people just want to believe all famous people are pedos or something...
That's what the _state_ should assume, not people.
As they say: if the shoe fits...
Honestly, I don't think that's been a thing like... ever. At least when talking about opinions outside the justice system, even though the argument can be made it doesn't work so well there either. It's a principle that many of us hold, absolutely. But people have always made assumptions first, usually based on what they want to be the truth, and their confirmation bias gets fed.
The burden of proof is always on the accuser
yes but we´ll never see it
Not always actually 😊
no definitely not... also DrChildMolester could at any point just say "no i did not do that" because no NDA could prevent him from saying what he didn't do unless he did do it
@@LoFiAxolotldo you believe he did it?
@@VoKilla he did not deny doing it... he denied doing any crimes... which plenty of things you can text a minor that could be considered sexting and soliciting sex that would not be crimes... nothing in an NDA can prevent him from denying something that is not part of the NDA... and i doubt randomly an NDA will say "You can't deny trying to diddle a child"
I’m not gonna believe it, unless we get hard evidence.
Facts and he said he didn’t do anything wrong.
The evidence is him not denying it and the Twitch staff member being the one accusing him.
FACTS WHO CARES ABOUT THE VICTIMS OPINION
@Soundielolbruh thats why he has 15.2 million subscribers and you have 3?
Exactly. Until we get actual proof, this is literally nothing more than hair salon gossip.
JUST GOT CRAZIER
A statement without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.
Remember kids, if Nathan Grayson says it happened, the likelihood it did immediately drops like a stone. If he says the sky is blue, go out and check.
@resjgamer2378 it's the way our atmosphere refracts the light.
@@resjgamer2378 🤓🤓🤓
@@resjgamer2378 It's purple.
@@resjgamer2378
Saying that color is dependent on light and vision is so obvious to not worth being considered. But as to the actual question implied, it's actually light refracting in the atmosphere, seperating out the waves that exist in the UV and upper visible range (ie violet). So unless you don't consider the atmosphere the sky, for some reason, your only "um actually" opportunity is to say "uhm actually it's mostly violet, not blue" and hope no one asks you for details.
You guys seriously arguing the semantics of this guys joke? Holy fuck the insecurity lmao
Doc is staying quiet, so his lawyer can bend them over again.
i cannot believe 2020 was already 4 years ago
this situation is about as crazy as an accountant doing bookkeeping. absolutely insane.