How Will The World's NEWEST Nuclear Icebreaker Work?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 415

  • @ch4.hayabusa
    @ch4.hayabusa ปีที่แล้ว +186

    Japan: We don't want ☢️ power, lets buy LNG instead
    Russia: Nuclear powered delivery of LNG for Tanaka, sign here

    • @MaximGhost
      @MaximGhost 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      Only 3.6 roentgens. Not great, not terrible.

    • @Arsenic71
      @Arsenic71 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@MaximGhost RBMK reactors don't explode.

    • @itsbxrd5220
      @itsbxrd5220 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MaximGhost it's not 3 roentgen... It's 15,000.

    • @79adventures
      @79adventures 7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      @@Arsenic71 ofc they don't they simply melt elephants

    • @superyamagucci
      @superyamagucci 2 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมา

      @@Arsenic71 :…don’t explode.
      Russia: Hold my vodka

  • @charlesblithfield6182
    @charlesblithfield6182 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Cool ship. I like how crew comfort is a priority. Commerce is obviously a prime reason that there are substantial resources being put into this project but military applications and Arctic sovereignty are in the mix as well.

  • @clintstinkeye5607
    @clintstinkeye5607 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    I'm not a hater of people that populate countries that have political issues with my United States.
    If Russia did something that worked better than ours I'm not feeling any hate.
    This elevates the standards and that isn't bad in my mind.
    Some competitions actually help more people than they hurt.

    • @dataman6744
      @dataman6744 ปีที่แล้ว +20

      "worked better"?? I don't think the US is anywhere near the Russians when it come to ice breakers, no one is

    • @nettlecarrier8259
      @nettlecarrier8259 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fun fact: Russia has no political issues with USA, it's the USA who has political issues with Russia. In the 90's Russia wanted to become allies with USA and in 2000s Putin proposed that Russia join NATO, but U.S. only wanted Russia as a gas station not partner, so they went on with their "containment policy" against Russia. That's what brings us where we are now. I mean, who on Earth would love being "contained"?

    • @simonmackie4924
      @simonmackie4924 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Funny saying a country that political issues with your country the US.

    • @MrNebelschatten
      @MrNebelschatten 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      clint here is indeed not from "his" United States but a Russian trying to claim that Americans are impressed with his countries achievements. Talking of having low self esteem Russia has patterns of overpromising and underdelivering.

    • @joshbobst1629
      @joshbobst1629 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@MrNebelschattenBut I am a u s citizen, and I am impressed with russia's achievements. History's fastest growing economy and no homelessness under the Soviets, and now putin has somehow managed to bring the country out from under the united states' plan for it: to be a third world resource mine. Russia is not my enemy, I don't know why the morons who run my country think it's theirs.

  • @astecheee1519
    @astecheee1519 ปีที่แล้ว +115

    "2 Soccer fields long and the height of a multi-story building". With measurements this vague, who needs lies?

    • @dallysinghson5569
      @dallysinghson5569 ปีที่แล้ว +26

      American freedom units.

    • @maksimer6612
      @maksimer6612 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Помереишь когда построим 👌!

    • @zukacs
      @zukacs 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      They said 650f

    • @northwind4362
      @northwind4362 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Displacement 69,700 tonnes (68,600 long tons)
      Length 209 m (686 ft)
      Beam 47.7 m (156 ft)
      Draft 13 m (43 ft)
      Depth 20.3 m (67 ft)

    • @azi6477
      @azi6477 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yup, but the creators from this item even translated metric back to the antique and stupid imperial system that the Americans are still holding on to.

  • @robincondite
    @robincondite ปีที่แล้ว +148

    Chemical Reaction???? I thought it was nuclear? Nuclear reactions are not chemical reactions...

    • @elizabethnilsson1815
      @elizabethnilsson1815 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Russians lead the world with the TOP BIGGEST and MOST ADVANCED ICEBREAKERS.
      They are Nuclear reactions and NOT CHEMICAL...

    • @johnwilkes5044
      @johnwilkes5044 ปีที่แล้ว

      Actually, they are. Nuclear reactions are the result of chemical elements decomposing. Yes, yes, don't bother nitpicking those of you who are thinking of it... I'm just trying to explain things simply...
      Chemistry happens when elements are combined in one or another many ways.
      Check out isotopes on Google, should give you a good initiation into Nuclear Chemistry..

    • @kef103
      @kef103 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      Ever hear of the periodic table from chemistry class?

    • @johnwilkes5044
      @johnwilkes5044 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yes, I'm intimatly familiar with it. Your point is..?

    • @steveallen1340
      @steveallen1340 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      @@kef103 Ever heard of a sub atom particle? Chemical reactions do not change the nucleus.

  • @glashoppah
    @glashoppah หลายเดือนก่อน +62

    No worries, Al Gore told me the arctic would be ice-free by 2014, so all we have to do is wait for 2014.

    • @auramdickerson112
      @auramdickerson112 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@glashoppah The northern passage opened for the first time in Ages in 2012. Close enough

    • @glashoppah
      @glashoppah หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@auramdickerson112 Uh huh.

    • @aaronzaloum7986
      @aaronzaloum7986 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@glashoppah if you say so.

    • @jaromor8808
      @jaromor8808 หลายเดือนก่อน

      😁😁😁😁😁

    • @HighlanderNorth1
      @HighlanderNorth1 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@auramdickerson112
      Yep, because having a passageway open for a short period of time is the same as the entire Arctic becoming semi-permanently ice free! Al Gore's predictions are still perfect! 😅

  • @firstnamelastnameisallowed7943
    @firstnamelastnameisallowed7943 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    If it is built the same way they are planning it then that will be some incredible ships!! Hope they pull it off and have great success with them!!

  • @onebridge7231
    @onebridge7231 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Very cool ship. The U.S. and Canada can’t even come close to Russia’s Ice Breakers.

    • @danmystro
      @danmystro หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tf does the US need an Ice breaker for

  • @Diaszurana
    @Diaszurana ปีที่แล้ว +19

    I'm going to keep my eyes on this one. VERY impressive!

  • @tiomoidofangle102
    @tiomoidofangle102 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'd love to convert one of these to an expedition yacht.

  • @lukehorning3404
    @lukehorning3404 26 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    I’m not a big fan of Russia but those icebreakers are pretty cool

  • @stephenferrari2362
    @stephenferrari2362 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’ll save you the trouble. It’s a cool show about cool ships. The comment section is “my dad can beat up your dad.”

  • @miketuggle9273
    @miketuggle9273 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That's nuttin'. I invented a super cheap ultra reliable ice breaker. A 60 pound sledge in my hand. Busts up all the ice i need. And whats really cool (pun intended) is I can pick up the smaller pieces and make margarita's after I get done.

    • @gp8666
      @gp8666 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      60 pounds? you must be busting really hard if its that swollen

  • @7071t6
    @7071t6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Just think of how good the lodging is on her as well?
    Food and other activities, which is internal, they will not be able to stop, unless there's a massive space which in summer months up north allows the ship to stop and allow the ship mates to get off at the north pole etc. ⚓⚓👌👌✌✌👍👍

  • @ZIGZAG12345
    @ZIGZAG12345 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Wow this comment section is full of clueless Reddit users who "stand with the latest thing"! 🤣😂👍

  • @ЯрославНовиков-в2ы
    @ЯрославНовиков-в2ы หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    One question - HOW? Isnt Russia a country who steal microwaves and washingmachines for chips?

    • @simulatedpilot3441
      @simulatedpilot3441 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ЯрославНовиков-в2ы I would like to see tankers and container ships under nuclear power with four reactors

    • @ЯрославНовиков-в2ы
      @ЯрославНовиков-в2ы หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@simulatedpilot3441 Russia has now a ship that is a nuclear plant by itself

  • @conantdog
    @conantdog 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Great ship builder's 💪

    • @6421rich
      @6421rich 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Not so great at war ships, tanks or fighter jet
      Or cars for that matter

    • @fredbecker607
      @fredbecker607 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​. Hammer and sickle tech,cut to shape and pound to fit.

  • @lyndon1961
    @lyndon1961 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    smash through that Ice at 10-12 knots,.. are you kidding...

  • @beagle3247
    @beagle3247 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The helipad really should get wind gaurds but I love how military this design is

  • @truththe1689
    @truththe1689 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    yeah break up the ice for faster melting of the poles, very nice.

  • @jjjpetersen
    @jjjpetersen หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Clickbait… where the cool red boat on the cover photo?

  • @VitoEdward-z4j
    @VitoEdward-z4j หลายเดือนก่อน

    Not what we have but what we enjoy constitutes our abundance.

  • @tikitiki7610
    @tikitiki7610 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great knowledge and individuals! thx for sharing, fascinating!!

  • @whiskeymonk4085
    @whiskeymonk4085 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How do I get a job on this vessel?

  • @jamesgarrison6430
    @jamesgarrison6430 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Protection from running aground haha its designed to ground itself on the thick ice and fall though it 😄

  • @RosinaMuto
    @RosinaMuto 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Altissima tecnología SOVIÉTICA

  • @sercanse
    @sercanse ปีที่แล้ว +2

    what is the name of the ship?

  • @richardgreen4567
    @richardgreen4567 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    This application should be used for all shipping

  • @danieladmassu941
    @danieladmassu941 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The new Leader class looks exciting to my untrained eyes. I hope we see it sooner than later and lives up to its specifications.

    • @dataman6744
      @dataman6744 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      We would have such reservations if we weren't talking about the world's leading country in icebreaker technology and construction. I wonder where your scepticism is coming from.?

  • @VerneLowell-t2g
    @VerneLowell-t2g 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Promises are the uniquely human way of ordering the future, making it predictable and reliable to the extent that this is humanly possible.

  • @mrMacGoover
    @mrMacGoover 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Canada better get building similar ships and securing our northern passage and make it economically viable for taxation to countries wanting to use it.

    • @TheTechnoPilot
      @TheTechnoPilot หลายเดือนก่อน

      We are increasing our northern security, but definitely can be doing more.

  • @janvanholten7592
    @janvanholten7592 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    This ship is a beauty. Leave it to the Russians, they are very capable!

    • @timothynechville8326
      @timothynechville8326 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ya and our politicians in the west want war with them. Crazy

  • @jeffthomas4246
    @jeffthomas4246 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    But, however, chemical reactions can lead to nuclear reactions though!

  • @douglachman7330
    @douglachman7330 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As long as it has a heavier stronger bow to match the high horsepower.

  • @redbeard8913
    @redbeard8913 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why do we need new ice breakers if the earth is getting hotter?

    • @johnscalzi6827
      @johnscalzi6827 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@redbeard8913 Its not getting hot fast enough for the people peddling hydro carbons they got to get their product to market, so they can make a bunch of money and there by melt the ice faster
      So they can get even more to market and poison the planet quicker,!

  • @JohnHill-k6p
    @JohnHill-k6p 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Russia always oversell and under delivers. Like most governments. Lots of icebreakers have used the bubbler system. They also use large tanks of water that they can pump from side to side to make the Shiprock. As far as open water capabilities, the wind class icebreakers that were built in the late 40s were made for North Atlantic escort duty. They weren’t the best riding. I know I spent two years on one, but we were in several hurricanes and had waves of 25+ foot and did just fine. We were also even with those small ships under 300 feet 68 feet wide capable of going through 15 foot thick ice. And the ship was tough enough that it lasted more than 40 years of continuous service going to the Arctic and Antarctic, and also breaking ice on the great lakes during the winter

    • @masskracka
      @masskracka 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @user-zd1du1zk7r huh you come across lots of tropical storms in the Arctic do you

    • @JohnHill-k6p
      @JohnHill-k6p 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@masskracka no not tropical storms in the Antarctic or Arctic, but you do come across very severe storms in both places and in order to get to either one you have to go through the tropics. Thanks for playing.

    • @JohnHill-k6p
      @JohnHill-k6p 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @IceBreaker-l5r in the early 70s I had the opportunity to be on a Russian icebreaker for five weeks. What I found is the people are just like us. Their red tape is 1000 times worse than ours when something breaks. It’s almost impossible to get a replacement. Their safety measures don’t come close to ours. Yes they’re big and they’re powerful but there’s always a trade-off. Again, the Russians always oversell their capabilities. And what I’m using to compare against is, I was on the very wind class icebreaker that we gave the Russians on a lend lease program right after World War II so I’m experienced in icebreakers and when we got our icebreaker back, it was a total total wreck.

    • @virginiosavani
      @virginiosavani 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      @@JohnHill-k6p And you are convinced that today's Russia is the same Soviet Union as almost 50 years ago...how pretentious. 🤣

    • @larry77117
      @larry77117 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Polar Star or Polar Sea.
      i helped paint inerta 160 coatings on them at Todd.
      awesome super tough vessels. even when compared to the other military ships We worked on.

  • @BEBESSCHET-rs7ir
    @BEBESSCHET-rs7ir 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The way the ice pack is melting, maybe we shouldn't be breaking up the ice. It's Probably making it melt faster!

  • @WendyHuggins-t4p
    @WendyHuggins-t4p 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    She had the gift of being able to paint songs.

  • @HoraceCamilla
    @HoraceCamilla หลายเดือนก่อน

    If you're in a bad situation, don't worry it'll change. If you're in a good situation, don't worry it'll change.

  • @LaurelFreeman-y6p
    @LaurelFreeman-y6p 26 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Those who are free of resentful thoughts surely find peace.

  • @maxiegrobner9018
    @maxiegrobner9018 หลายเดือนก่อน

    All this technology and in the end it still gets down to steam. Steam to move latterly and liquid fuel to move vertically. We aren’t really making progress.

  • @kenkluge9473
    @kenkluge9473 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Put a laser on the front. Ice problem solved.

    • @flixri726
      @flixri726 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Using lasers to melt ice is an idea that can only come from someone who has no idea of physics.

    • @yun-z
      @yun-z 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@flixri726 ice can absorb infra red pretty well, so just use IR lasers.

    • @flixri726
      @flixri726 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@yun-z yeah no

    • @skyblue5509
      @skyblue5509 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      how about 30mm machine gun with unlimited ammo

    • @aigslmnop
      @aigslmnop หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@kenkluge9473 yes lasers are too highly focused the power density is unlikely to permeate since ice insulates well

  • @SssVvv-q7i
    @SssVvv-q7i 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    stop breaking the ice, that makes ice melting

  • @vanguard9067
    @vanguard9067 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I hope Canada and the US collaborate on fleet of modern, powerful icebreakers. Together, they can ensure the Northwest Passage becomes a viable trade route as climate change opens the Arctic Ocean to near year-round shipping.

    • @tomascernak6112
      @tomascernak6112 ปีที่แล้ว

      Northwest Passage sucks. It is surrounded by land and thus ice is much thicker, atmosphere is much cooler and sea floor is not deep enough. In summer, it is usable, but in winter is not. Even with icebreakers.

    • @MrZombiekiller23
      @MrZombiekiller23 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      The US is unable to build new icebreakers because they don't have the manufacturing capability to develop thick enough steel anymore, US shipbuilding altogether is in dire disrepair

    • @tomascernak6112
      @tomascernak6112 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MrZombiekiller23 I do not think, that thickness of steel would be main reason. After all USA is still building aircraft carriers which have really thick hull. Problem would be, that USCG wants them to build as warships (ability to carry weapons on board if needed) and for that does not have original contract winner experience or capabilities. This was solved by buyout by military ship supplier but made that 3 years gap between original planned delivery and current planned delivery.

    • @vanguard9067
      @vanguard9067 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@MrZombiekiller23that’s ridiculous. Have you ever watched steel-making videos on TH-cam?

    • @piotrberman6363
      @piotrberman6363 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      A bigger problem may be lack of "gas stations" in Arctic, and US and Canada seem to suck in nuclear power technology. Russia also invests in ore extracting projects that will add additional domestic demand for the Northeast Passage, ore processing requires power that can come from small nuclear plants and transportation of the products plus all supplies for the mines and the miners. I am not sure what Arctic projects can Canada develop.

  • @henrycarlson7514
    @henrycarlson7514 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting , Thank You . I hope it works, and can be built

  • @Spearhead45
    @Spearhead45 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    damn russia knows how to make a good looking ship.

  • @savagemako17
    @savagemako17 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You should show counter rotating props on your modeling.

  • @dudley5658
    @dudley5658 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why not build cargo subs and go under the ice?

  • @ilkertaysi6812
    @ilkertaysi6812 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Chemical reaction!!! 🤣 You don’t know what you’re talking about bro!!

    • @The_vincepryor
      @The_vincepryor ปีที่แล้ว +11

      @ilkertaysi6812 The nuclear rods super heating the water creating steam that turns the turbine. Which is a chemical reaction.
      They may have said chemical reaction because they are translating from Russian to English. We don't use the same words.
      So I won't say you don't know what YOU are talking about.
      I will say you are unaware and spoke out of ignorance my dear sibling. 😁

    • @ilkertaysi6812
      @ilkertaysi6812 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@The_vincepryor oh boy! so... water becoming vapor is a chemical reaction!!? ok.. I am not gonna make fun of you but it is a physical reaction not a chemical.

    • @The_vincepryor
      @The_vincepryor ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ilkertaysi6812 Things get lost in translation.
      As you know Chemical changes usually involve the production of Energy... By definition.
      Follow me.
      The Russian guy was talking about a nuclear Generator that produces Energy.
      To clarify the nuclear-powered steam engine turned a turbine that produced energy.
      He was translating Russian.
      It is my belief the translator was trying to be concise in his translation.
      The translator is not a physicist.
      Relax bro.

    • @bentheguru4986
      @bentheguru4986 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@The_vincepryor ROFL @ That pearl of wisdom.... Nuclear reaction generates HEAT. Heat transfers to water generating steam to spin turbines. The only chemical reactions are that of corrosion which are mitigated inside the systems. Back to school buddy.

    • @fakename8856
      @fakename8856 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@The_vincepryor nuclear is not a chemical reaction. Heating water is not a chemical reaction. Do you know what q chemical reaction is?

  • @HarryHound
    @HarryHound หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Awesome

  • @LeeMartha-k3w
    @LeeMartha-k3w หลายเดือนก่อน

    Though no one can go back and make a brand new start, anyone can start from not and make a brand new ending.

  • @MariaCocker
    @MariaCocker หลายเดือนก่อน

    Formula for success: under promise and over deliver.

  • @SamponSweet
    @SamponSweet หลายเดือนก่อน

    They can conquer who believe they can.

  • @caldodge
    @caldodge 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Nuclear reactors don't generate energy from chemical reactions.

  • @sissywalker1955
    @sissywalker1955 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Wait i thoght we were trying to save the ice, so we are trying to break it up? Someone needs to tell Gretta!

    • @dizzleslaunsen2372
      @dizzleslaunsen2372 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      In the 1970 there was a smog cloud over Los Angeles, and thanks to regulations the level of smog has gone down significantly since then and air quality is much better. We also used to have the “hole” in the ozone layer that due to banning CFCs and aerosols has been greatly reduced. Neither of those would have been possible if people with your mindset had their way.

  • @MyrnaAntoinette
    @MyrnaAntoinette หลายเดือนก่อน

    How we spend our days is, of course, how we spend our lives.

  • @timothynechville8326
    @timothynechville8326 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They are not Chemical reactions.

  • @mikebeatstsb7030
    @mikebeatstsb7030 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why they don't just have a boiling hot huge shower 🚿 spraying in front of them?
    Or a heated blade like front.. ❔
    Or two of them large metal screw wheel things facing each other along the water line @
    (the Bow? isit) the front of the ship so it could "climb" up over the blockage an use it's weight crashing bk down ² break up the pack

    • @jonathanhirschbaum6754
      @jonathanhirschbaum6754 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

      This all been done before. Sounds good, doesnt work. As per climbing and breaking with the mass - thats exactly what is doing. Hence the name: breaker. Not cutter

    • @2012isnear-my-my-my
      @2012isnear-my-my-my 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      that will take you a year to cross a mile

  • @id104335409
    @id104335409 25 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Hydrocarbons.......☠

  • @youtube7076
    @youtube7076 ปีที่แล้ว

    15:19 sure no power is one thing, what happens it it capsizes is it still a fool proof reactor?

  • @michag5561
    @michag5561 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Congratulations!

  • @tobyw9573
    @tobyw9573 25 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Start icebreaker project, start with conventional hull, made with stainless steel with gas turbine engines. Musk is a master of metallurgy, electric motors, and manufacturing. Build simple, medium power ships first. Time to completion is a big factor and will positively affect cost per hour. Musk is a master of continuous development of projects. Perhaps an overhaul of an existing icebreaker is a good start. There may be benefits to catamaran style hulls.

  • @colinjames7569
    @colinjames7569 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very cool. Russians are very versatile and very good at adapting. I think ballasts as used by modern US Navy would be immensely useful 😁

  • @leprechaun7667
    @leprechaun7667 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is NOT nuclear! This is a Chemical reaction!!

    • @Virtualik
      @Virtualik 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Works on vodka.

  • @loganj.2329
    @loganj.2329 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Who knew nuclear reactors were chemicals reacting...learn sum new erryday

    • @joshbobst1629
      @joshbobst1629 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's true tho. Everything is a chemical, so uranium atoms reacting together are indeed chemicals reacting. It's just not a chemical reaction.

    • @2012isnear-my-my-my
      @2012isnear-my-my-my 21 วันที่ผ่านมา

      its just bad translation

  • @danieloblinger1199
    @danieloblinger1199 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One form of uranium, losing neutrons, and becoming another form of uranium is a chemical reaction.

    • @TheTechnoPilot
      @TheTechnoPilot หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, that’s a nuclear reaction. Chemical is breaking and forming chemical bonds between molecules, nuclear is changes in the nucleus of the atom.

  • @cckeysify
    @cckeysify หลายเดือนก่อน

    what are feet?

  • @Lietuva47
    @Lietuva47 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Атомки даже совсем не плохо ! А то их отходы може уже переработать и опять использовать ....... ;)!

    • @johnscalzi6827
      @johnscalzi6827 29 วันที่ผ่านมา

      I hate to disagree but nuclear power is dangerous the waste is not recycled except to make ammo yo use against tanks.
      A 22,000 year half life is daunting man had never built anything that has lasted 22,000 years. How about the reactors sitting on yhe bottom of the ocean whats going to happen when the fuel get exposed to sea?
      Nuclear power is not safe i served on a nuclear powered submarine when i was in the Navy.

  • @lilesmw
    @lilesmw ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Incredible

  • @MrChriss000
    @MrChriss000 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Will they float longer than the Moskva?

  • @jaromor8808
    @jaromor8808 หลายเดือนก่อน

    if you break the ice you'll pay for it!

  • @davidbonilla7770
    @davidbonilla7770 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Should we be breaking up huge pieces of ice?

    • @2112kustoms.
      @2112kustoms. หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidbonilla7770 it's sea ice not glaciers

    • @davidbonilla7770
      @davidbonilla7770 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@2112kustoms. so destroying it can’t effect water temperature if they’re breaking it up nonstop?

  • @MiloYellowknee
    @MiloYellowknee หลายเดือนก่อน

    I bet it will look nothing like this

  • @ExecuteBrandon
    @ExecuteBrandon 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Nuclear reaction, not chemical.

  • @1EliPrice
    @1EliPrice หลายเดือนก่อน

    Narrator sounds like Tony Hinchcliffe

  • @pashapasovski5860
    @pashapasovski5860 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Jelouski Ukronazis are plenty here!

  • @RidoDrago
    @RidoDrago 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Its 100 feet long. Not your feet, but mine. If we use your feet it'll be only 89 my-feet long

  • @jonnyringo6338
    @jonnyringo6338 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why cant they sell their hydrocarbons in Europe? oh yeah, thats right.

    • @ZIGZAG12345
      @ZIGZAG12345 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Europe decided that paying about 50% more for their energy was a good idea to show how serious they are about, "standing with the latest thing"! 😂
      (Meanwhile some German manufacturers are closing their now uncompetitive plants in Germany and opening more operations in USA and China! 🤣🤣)

  • @realistic.optimist
    @realistic.optimist ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nuclear reactions NOT chemical reactions. I stopped watching at that point. No one checks this?

  • @themechanic2938
    @themechanic2938 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The guy at 12:22 sure looks like putin nephew

  • @dafrasier1
    @dafrasier1 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Steam Powered, nuclear 'fired'. Still in the Steam Power Age. not coal but Nuclear Heat boils water = steam.

  • @staggerinstanton56
    @staggerinstanton56 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Nothing against the Russian people. Russia hasn't always had the best record with nuclear powerplants. Mobile or stationary.

    • @47ex1
      @47ex1 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Please give several examples

    • @Matt-yg8ub
      @Matt-yg8ub 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@47ex1 I’m betting their number one example will actually be Ukrainian :-)

  • @Qatarp
    @Qatarp ปีที่แล้ว +2

    لمصر متأكد بعد ضربها عبدها في كونها وهو و نحنا عشاش صشقار سودان سودان

  • @outbacktrek
    @outbacktrek หลายเดือนก่อน +1

  • @randyrobertson4686
    @randyrobertson4686 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Designing the latest and greatest future mega ice breaking ships of the future is a curious endeavor to me. From a practical perspective, and obviously including monetary considerations, from all the chatter coming from peer reviewed studies written on recycled materials, and notarized with the artistically relevant and specifically designed logo made from mounds of material one could find practically blind folded waltzing through a local grazing prairie recently occupied by the most elite bovine specimens in the Northern Hemisphere. Aside from being distracted by the clever and humiliating contraptions strapped to the backs of the poor sheep in the pen over that are connected to their anuses to capture any methane, and you can assist the 2 gravely injured Red Tailed Hawks that were accidentally lacerated by the 130 foot tall eye sore that is spinning and humming just above you. Hopefully the noise pollution won’t interfere with your equilibrium so you can get into your best Flo Jo style “run for your life” routine and get to your Prius. It’s almost inevitable at this point that you could not help but say to yourself…..what exactly is going on around here?
    Despite all this greenery and enormous and endless amounts of capital being pilfered….. I mean invested to combat the next ice age, wait….that’s right, we’re not in the early to mid 70’s. I meant the warming of the planet by humans ourselves and apparently sheep and bovines and other farm animals plus the rampaging SUV’s and small private jets and 15, 8 cylinder limousines that are running nonstop with the air conditioning on full blast waiting for powerful individuals to exit the building after an exhausting 5 hours of ranting and shaming everyone who paid big bucks to watch the individual speak on conservation and reducing pollution and your carbon footprint of inexcusable sizes and how much they need to lead by example…….which will remain their little secret that they don’t.
    But regardless of this…..we must ponder the reasons such enormous amounts of money are being wasted to develop a behemoth of a ship that will be capable of breaking through ice fields that seem to be endless and are so thick that they must be maintained before the ice gets so thick that even a larger ship could not breach. Why I ask, why completely flush hard earned money down the toilet?? A titanic floating machine of these dimensions and thickness will simply not be necessary, for the road we are told that we’re heading down will not require any machinery for a purpose or reason that will not plague mankind anymore.

    • @spicesmuggler2452
      @spicesmuggler2452 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      yikes

    • @vanguard9067
      @vanguard9067 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@spicesmuggler2452 Yikes is right! A truly massive, manic, manifesto…oh I am tired already:-)

  • @Canoga_Knuckles
    @Canoga_Knuckles 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Pretty graphics, no boat !

    • @xitrou
      @xitrou 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In development now

  • @jeremytibbs13
    @jeremytibbs13 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't understand what about global warming and all. Isn't this like idk.... nvm

  • @andrzej3511
    @andrzej3511 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    NEWEST RUSSIAN Nuclear Icebreaker Work?
    I'll believe it when I see it sailing to the pole! And for now I believe in this sailing as much as in their last successful landing on the moon...

    • @blackwidowsm
      @blackwidowsm หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@andrzej3511like there last 24 ice breakers they have three ordered for delivery in near future. While United states has three ice breakers two currently operable. Canada has one besides the new one one scheduled for that’s ooerable. Too many breakers are in op atm in these two countries. Russia builds more ice breakers in a buildingvttterm than USA or Canada has operable ice breakers. It’s one form of ship building they have no equal on . Then again you adapt to environment which you live.

  • @wy9718
    @wy9718 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow so much Natural Gas in Russia! Do all towns have the infrustructure to heat and cook and does every citizen receive a gas allowance every year?

    • @ZIGZAG12345
      @ZIGZAG12345 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Since the Russian state has the most control of the exraction companies, the prices for gas are kept tiny for the people who live there. The fuel they put in their vehicles looks like it's very cheap too.
      Meanwhile, I'm here in the UK. The UK has oil and gas in the North Sea. But......they've given all control of those to PRIVATE companies, so we who live here get to be ripped off and pay extrotionate amounts for it. The governmant puts a nice 60-65% tax on it too if we're buying energy from a petrol station.
      Sometimes, if the private companies don't think they've made enough money, the govt here gives THEM an "allowance"! Prices stay high, it's just that pensioners, unemployed, people on REALLY low incomes etc., have some of the bill paid by the government. Gotta make sure those PRIVATE companies stay rich, y0!

  • @pbtyo
    @pbtyo ปีที่แล้ว +1

    and where can we see a real ice braker? not pictures I mean

    • @DestinationBarbarism
      @DestinationBarbarism 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You can look at Project 22220 class that has three ships in service already (Ural, Sibir, Arktika), that are by far the most powerful ice breakers in the world. Taking that title from the previous by-far-most-powerful-icebreakers in the world, the Arktika-class which still has two ships in service (Yamal, 50 Let Pobedy).
      As they say, the Project 10510 is enormously expensive and the Northern Sea Route is not the mega transport route bringing in huge money yet, much of it is in planning stages. So the Russians are holding off with further ships to see how it actually develops.

  • @LeoMkII
    @LeoMkII ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Well it's way uglier than the older soviet breakers but hey! If it works. They should paint it orange like a stinking castle like they used to do though

    • @LeoMkII
      @LeoMkII ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The original arctic literally looks like some sort of steampunk kremlin roaming the bast ice of the far north lol

    • @Militaryst.
      @Militaryst. 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Не завидуй. Это грех😂😂😂😂

  • @moonlander03
    @moonlander03 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gata love mother Russia.. 😎😎😎😎😎💪💪💪💪💪💪

  • @realomon
    @realomon หลายเดือนก่อน

    and russia has about 40 of those.

  • @FAS1948
    @FAS1948 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    You need to talk more slowly and clearly if you want to be understood by most English speakers. I have lived in the UK for all but 5 years of my life and I struggled to keep up with what you were saying.

  • @MrEnjoivolcom1
    @MrEnjoivolcom1 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Russia always takes the cheapest option.

  • @dusancorlija9088
    @dusancorlija9088 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Use CGS (centimeter, gram, second) system. who care for feet, OK?

    • @josephpadula2283
      @josephpadula2283 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      C,g, s is obsolete decades ago !
      MKS is current practice .
      SI for short …..”

  • @jaakkobergman4489
    @jaakkobergman4489 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    FFS use metrics, just like rest of the world....hurts my brain to trying to convert foots and soccerfields and washing machines and toyota corollas and african elephants what your freedom units seem to be....and si illogical convertions between units.

  • @kimscott8176
    @kimscott8176 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No problem. Bad drunk workers and nuclear power. good times. pass the chernobyl

  • @johnelliott3617
    @johnelliott3617 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    No thrusters for the bow, looks antiquated already, go get em Russia.

    • @manofsan
      @manofsan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      How you gonna engineer bow thrusters? Which icebreaker has these?

    • @PopTheMissile
      @PopTheMissile 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      tf you need bow thrusters for on ice breakers? to capsize?

  • @HanabangIrawan-nu7uo
    @HanabangIrawan-nu7uo 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Here is the real biggest icebraker whole the world , russia icebraker