Awesome truck man! I am currently in the market for a 6.7 there is a 19 F350 that has 119k miles on it. It is deleted and looks well taken care of and in the same price range as some 12-16 6.7s gotta talk to the owner to see how well taken care of it was. Awesome to hear these trucks getting high milage!
Consider the Maryland Performance Diesel intake tubes and the SPE intercooler. Also the DCR high pressure fuel pump. You’ll fall in love with your truck all over again.
I agree with you regarding not needing to run a fuel additive. I opted to install a S&S second generation disaster prevention kit for like $400 in the event that my CP4 implodes. My thinking was that it isn't likely that the CP4 will die as long as I am staying on top of water separation, filter changes, and getting fuel at larger places where the fuel is moving often like "truck stops"..... BUT if it does let loose I'll just basically be looking at the cost of replacing the CP4 instead of $10,000+ and basically going through the entire fuel system.
I agree with what you said about 2023's and that goes for all manufacturers. One thing they learned during Covid shortages is that they can charge more for a cheaper product and people will still buy as long as cheap money is available to finance. Maybe they lose 5-10k on a finance deal but they gained 30k off the top with better profit margins. Combine that with a the demonization of combustion fuels we are looking at a sad decade for reliability. I am happy with my 2023 f150 5.0 so far. It's an STX so no frills.
This entire DEF and emission requirements by the EPA is a total scam that just cost consumers. The same thing happened with gasoline engines when the emissions got strict and manufacturers has to goto direct injection (from port injection) for the engines. Unfortunately, with direct injection, fuel no longer clean the back side of the intake valves and serious carbon build up results. This leads to degraded performance at around 60K miles not to mention worse emission and forces the owners to have to go through expensive walnut shell blasting to clean the carbon!!!
Nothing is about lasting forever these days its all about throwing out the old and getting the newest so corporations make money and same thing with EVs just one big driving tracking device that will drain your bank account from repairs they don't care about saving the planet
515K isn't alot of miles for a diesel engine!! V8 or not as the Europeans use mostly V8 or there best most powerful and most expensive over the road diesel Scania usually last a few million built very similar to the 6.7 Powerstroke except there emissions are nowhere near as horrible for there diesel engines than the racquet system we have in the states! I mean. Look at the carbon footprint it leaves to mine all the metals for the tailpipe,the DEF is very toxic not to mention when emissions systems start going out we're looking at around $30,000 for everything I mean its insane and only for American Diesels that I know of. Every million mile 6.7 Powerstroke (that I know of) atleast has the EGR system deleted as thats got to be absolutely horrid for an engine especially on a $75,000-$105,000 truck I mean they could atleast invest the science into the emissions as Europe has a fuel pump that almost eliminates emissions they're about to put into production I believe.. Anyway point being and I'm not being rude I just think we're getting ripped off just because we want/need a powerful,very nice interior work truck that we need dependable service out of it for the life of the vehicle which diesels are built so strong they're automatically in that category but being corked off at both ends not to mention at the top end recirculating the exhaust when without all that crap on there not only less metal we have to manufacture for less engines built because they would last,better MPG that makes up for the missions, not to mention not having to rape the earth even further by the DEF and tail pipe end of the equation getting those precious metals! Don't get me wrong I absolutely hate those "rolling coal" videos and people doing it!! Thats what keeps middle aged hard working men/women from having a hard working,reliable multi million mile engine as I have no dought they'd last a couple million without all that crap and the new S&S 6.7 fuel pump ill have a real diesel engine soon enough! At 500,000 miles you should still have a still very reliable diesel engine as strong as these powerstrokes especially 17-19 are built with the 6R140! No offense to anyone just my opinion on this platform especially 17-19 I wouldn't even buy a newer one with what im seeing and hearing everyone go through with them!
Love my '18 but boy i relate to the motorcraft batteries being trash, and ive used more zip ties and duct tape on my intercooler outlet tube then you could ever imagine 😅
No doubt about it the 2017-2019 Ford Super Duty’s 6.7 Powerstroke is my favorite truck. I am a huge truck guy, love the 6.7 Powerstroke it’s a beastly engine. I can definitely tell you I despise the new 2023 Super Duty’s because they don’t look like American Trucks. FYI I did follow you on a Facebook 🙃
Nice truck and video! Just bought a 2019 F250 XLT with 56k mi on it. Any recommendations for upgrades? Do these engines have the same problems as the 6.4L powerstroke with the dpf?
Sweet. Not at all. The emission systems on the 6.7 are pretty. Good. You probably won’t have any issues until 150k+. Then again depends on what your doing with it. I deleted mine at 140k.
@Jacob Overman I just couldn't gamble with that cp4 pump the one on my dad's started acting weird at 150k miles wouldn't hold rail pressure I ended up putting my old cp4 pump in it and it worked fine those cp4s really are a ticking time bomb
ss diesel came out with a drop in cp4 alternative that's supposed to be bulletproof. but honestly with the lift pump on these u don't see very failures under 200k unless they put def in the tank or didn't change fuel filters or something self inflicted
On the off chance you see this, how are inspections now that it had some weight loss surgery? I'm in NC as well and looking to buy 20-22 (or 17-19 if I find the right one) truck next year. Also not a fan of new body style or the prices, but its hard to get away from those even used.
I've seen alot of older trucks go 300/400k without any issues what so ever. A guy in town has a 90's f250 diesel that has well over 600k . I don't see anything made in the 2000's that can do that without major work .
Had a 2003 duramax go 450k before I sold it with orignal motor and tranny, my work truck now is a 2006 duramax that has 310k on the clock and same thing. Hoping my 22 f250 holds up the same. Its all about maintenance, dont change your oil every 10k miles like they want you too cut it in half. Same with tranny, Ford says 150k service life on the tranny which is bs and they know it
I looked up the 2023 F250 and yes I agree they are ugly more ugly then the newer tundras. The F250’s doesn’t show as much grille like they used too when they first started making them especially with the Lariants
@@JacobOverman The snake pattern through the headlights on the 2023 serve no purpose and just tells the world Ford designers have no clue what they're doing!!! It just looks stupid beyone belief!!!!
Jesus, 23k on those tires! Holy cow they did not last. I have 57k on my Cooper XLT3's. Big lug all terrain tire. Low noise and I get 18 city 24 highway. I paid $240 per tire. I have at least 20k left on them. I have 16k towing 15k trailer
Mud Terrains don't last as long. I had the Cooper AT3 XLT on my 2017 F250 FX4 6.7, and got 50k and still had 9/32" on it before I tossed them for Micky Thompsons Baja Boss ATs. Burnouts and towing both wear tires out. You should measure your tires to gauge your average mileage per each /32" of rubber. Then measure then after you do some burn outs and see how many mile's of usage you are wasting doing burnouts.
Your truck looks way better than the 2023s. Ford shot themselves in the back with that horrific ugly exterior styling not to mention the 4th grade design of the bar graph instruments!!!
Good god y'all whine like women. Guaranteed in 2 years y'all are going to be singing the 23+ SD praises, because y'all are Ford guys, which means it's the best, and you've grown use to it's looks, etc. It happens every F'in time. I don't care if it's an 18 Mustang GT, 19 Silverado 1500, 19 Ram 1500, 2020 Silverado 2500, 07 GT500, C6 Corvette, etc, the fans of that series of vehicle always hate on that series newness at first, then accept it, and eventually learn to prefer it. I was like this with the 21 F150. I never thought that the 21 F150 was ugly, but I found it borning, and "meh" looking. Now, a few years later I've learned to appreciate it's simple, and clean design. When spec'd correctly a 23 SD is not ugly, but let's act like men here and deal with reality in an honest way, bed steps aren't intended to add in style, but are made to help in functionality, and easing the use of a tall, modern truck as a work vehicle. As a 2018 F150 FX4 owner I can saying in all honesty that GM's bumper/bed step setup is way better then Fords tailgate step setup. In fact the tailgate step sucks balls compared to the bumper steps when it comes to practically, easy of use, convenience, confidence inspiring, and solid feel when in use to move heavy items in, and out the bed, etc. The clean and hidden looks of the tailgate step do look better visually though. The real gist of it is that in reality GM's beds are the best in the business. They're big, not aluminum, and the multifunction tailgate is actually very useful, and better than anything Ford, FCA, Yota, or Nissan make. I understand the importance of looks on a new, expensive truck, but the OP isn't the one to be complaining about it. First you're rocking an 8' bed on a non-DRW truck. You're obviously prioritizing functionality over looks here, as long beds are ugly, especially on crewcab trucks. (6.5' beds are ugly on crewcab half-tons) Unless you're a total redneck, the OP's front bumper does not add in improving upon the looks of a 2017 F250 Lariats frontend, but it's definitely looks pretty beefy, but heavy in both a good and bad way. Toolboxes mounted in the bed, do not help make trucks look better, but they can ade it function depending on what you use your truck for. Obviously the OP's F250 is far from the cream of the crop in terms of good looking 2017 SD truck, but it seems that he set it up to add value to it for him in his line of work, which 500 HP and 1,200 lb-ft OEM, a 10R140, and bedside/bumper steps do to the 2023 SD's, so why is the internet whining about it's style so much? A mid-2000's 6L PSD SRW SD with the 5 spoke 20's is a better looking truck than any style SD released since then. Does that make it a better truck than a modern 6.7L PSD truck? No. Should people say, "my 06 F250 FX4 looks better than a 23 F250, so I'm not going to upgrade, even though my 6L is costing me out my ass in repairs, and at 340K miles of hard use the whole truck's just tired. I depend on my truck for my business, and can easily afford to step into a newer one, but gee golly they sure don't look as good as my 06, so I'll just keep compromising my back health, and safety basic on my old, worn out truck, that see a lot of work looking better with its 5 spoke OEM wheels and no bed/bumper steps."
@@JROC734 And here is one that affects safety: Of the 3 manufacturers mentioned, Ford is the only one with a major safety flaw in the design of their auto transmission!!! • In an emergency, you can't push the shift lever from D into N with an open palm!!! This is not shifting in the normal sense by pulling up on the shift lever and changing gears! • On Ram, Chevy, GMC as well as most other auto manufacturers you can do the emergency disconnect move - Honda, Toyota, BMW, Lexus, Audi, Mercedes, Nissan just to name a few!!! • The same is true on Ford's console mounted auto transmissions - you can't do the above move but have to push the lockout button!! • The whole idea behind this safety design is to allow the driver to disconnect the engine from the drivetrain without having to worry about putting the trans into Reverse! There is a safety detent and the transmission cannot go into Reverse with this emergency procedure! • No dealer know about this because for some reason, the manufacturers do not publish this info!!! Try it - you just may be pleasantly surprised unless you own a Ford product!!!!
@@JROC734 Of all the HD truck manufacturers, Ford has the best styling even though, they messed up big time for the 23s. Remember, styling is a no cost design element and it is only the way it is executed that affects costs. Search TH-cam for the Huracan Tecnica and what Lamborghini did! You won't find Italian designers do amateur moves like Ford did!!! Take a look at that video, it is as amazing as the car is stunning in person!!!
Own a 2019, 6.7 Platinum with a delete, runs 650hp, and 1200 ft. Lbs. torque. Will never give it up, awesome truck
Where tf do you live? Canada 😂
Awesome truck man! I am currently in the market for a 6.7 there is a 19 F350 that has 119k miles on it. It is deleted and looks well taken care of and in the same price range as some 12-16 6.7s gotta talk to the owner to see how well taken care of it was. Awesome to hear these trucks getting high milage!
Consider the Maryland Performance Diesel intake tubes and the SPE intercooler. Also the DCR high pressure fuel pump. You’ll fall in love with your truck all over again.
My 19 350 srw has 166k on it bought it with 80k and still going strong just pulled a 44 footer from nc to Texas a few weeks ago on 37s
Love my 2017 6.7 🇺🇸
I agree with you regarding not needing to run a fuel additive. I opted to install a S&S second generation disaster prevention kit for like $400 in the event that my CP4 implodes.
My thinking was that it isn't likely that the CP4 will die as long as I am staying on top of water separation, filter changes, and getting fuel at larger places where the fuel is moving often like "truck stops"..... BUT if it does let loose I'll just basically be looking at the cost of replacing the CP4 instead of $10,000+ and basically going through the entire fuel system.
Yessir great trucks! I’ve put 320k on my 17 350
sounds amazing!
Thanks!
I agree with what you said about 2023's and that goes for all manufacturers. One thing they learned during Covid shortages is that they can charge more for a cheaper product and people will still buy as long as cheap money is available to finance. Maybe they lose 5-10k on a finance deal but they gained 30k off the top with better profit margins. Combine that with a the demonization of combustion fuels we are looking at a sad decade for reliability. I am happy with my 2023 f150 5.0 so far. It's an STX so no frills.
This entire DEF and emission requirements by the EPA is a total scam that just cost consumers. The same thing happened with gasoline engines when the emissions got strict and manufacturers has to goto direct injection (from port injection) for the engines. Unfortunately, with direct injection, fuel no longer clean the back side of the intake valves and serious carbon build up results. This leads to degraded performance at around 60K miles not to mention worse emission and forces the owners to have to go through expensive walnut shell blasting to clean the carbon!!!
Yup. Total plan is to make everything unreliable and too expensive for common folk that keep things going.
Nothing is about lasting forever these days its all about throwing out the old and getting the newest so corporations make money and same thing with EVs just one big driving tracking device that will drain your bank account from repairs they don't care about saving the planet
Idk man my 2012 has almost 300k on the new motor, 515k on the body still doing okay
515K isn't alot of miles for a diesel engine!! V8 or not as the Europeans use mostly V8 or there best most powerful and most expensive over the road diesel Scania usually last a few million built very similar to the 6.7 Powerstroke except there emissions are nowhere near as horrible for there diesel engines than the racquet system we have in the states! I mean. Look at the carbon footprint it leaves to mine all the metals for the tailpipe,the DEF is very toxic not to mention when emissions systems start going out we're looking at around $30,000 for everything I mean its insane and only for American Diesels that I know of. Every million mile 6.7 Powerstroke (that I know of) atleast has the EGR system deleted as thats got to be absolutely horrid for an engine especially on a $75,000-$105,000 truck I mean they could atleast invest the science into the emissions as Europe has a fuel pump that almost eliminates emissions they're about to put into production I believe.. Anyway point being and I'm not being rude I just think we're getting ripped off just because we want/need a powerful,very nice interior work truck that we need dependable service out of it for the life of the vehicle which diesels are built so strong they're automatically in that category but being corked off at both ends not to mention at the top end recirculating the exhaust when without all that crap on there not only less metal we have to manufacture for less engines built because they would last,better MPG that makes up for the missions, not to mention not having to rape the earth even further by the DEF and tail pipe end of the equation getting those precious metals! Don't get me wrong I absolutely hate those "rolling coal" videos and people doing it!! Thats what keeps middle aged hard working men/women from having a hard working,reliable multi million mile engine as I have no dought they'd last a couple million without all that crap and the new S&S 6.7 fuel pump ill have a real diesel engine soon enough! At 500,000 miles you should still have a still very reliable diesel engine as strong as these powerstrokes especially 17-19 are built with the 6R140! No offense to anyone just my opinion on this platform especially 17-19 I wouldn't even buy a newer one with what im seeing and hearing everyone go through with them!
Trump 2024
One nice truck!
ive had my 11 f450 since 2010, 59k miles. fucking love it to death man.
Love my '18 but boy i relate to the motorcraft batteries being trash, and ive used more zip ties and duct tape on my intercooler outlet tube then you could ever imagine 😅
You are correct, sir, 2017,18, 19. Best looking trucks. Have a 2002 f350 7.3L w/413,000 mi. Good old truck, just looking for something newer.
I get a new powerstroke every year since 15 my 23 is by far the best one yet comfort and performance
Replacing an entire front axle just because the 4WD universal joints are worn sounds nuts.
No doubt about it the 2017-2019 Ford Super Duty’s 6.7 Powerstroke is my favorite truck. I am a huge truck guy, love the 6.7 Powerstroke it’s a beastly engine. I can definitely tell you I despise the new 2023 Super Duty’s because they don’t look like American Trucks.
FYI I did follow you on a Facebook 🙃
Sounds like we agree. Yeah I saw that!!! Thanks for watching
@@JacobOverman your welcome bro, keep up the great work! Always look forward to truck videos 🇺🇸
Lol my 2002 7.3 only has 147,000 on it lol kinda ironic but great video can’t wait to see Gary back in action again
Awesome! Yeah I can’t wait either
Nice truck and video! Just bought a 2019 F250 XLT with 56k mi on it. Any recommendations for upgrades? Do these engines have the same problems as the 6.4L powerstroke with the dpf?
Sweet. Not at all. The emission systems on the 6.7 are pretty. Good. You probably won’t have any issues until 150k+. Then again depends on what your doing with it. I deleted mine at 140k.
on my lml duramax i run tune 5 daily 600hp to the rear wheels cp3 pump swapped stealth 67 turbo too zero issues with the motor after delete
Good stuff.
@Jacob Overman I just couldn't gamble with that cp4 pump the one on my dad's started acting weird at 150k miles wouldn't hold rail pressure I ended up putting my old cp4 pump in it and it worked fine those cp4s really are a ticking time bomb
Yeah the 2023 is hideous, I don't get it. The 2017-2022 was perfect
Looks great for 171k! Are you using any fuel additives. I'm looking at buying a diesel but can't get over the cp4 failures.
I talk about it in the video. I no longer run a fuel additive
ss diesel came out with a drop in cp4 alternative that's supposed to be bulletproof. but honestly with the lift pump on these u don't see very failures under 200k unless they put def in the tank or didn't change fuel filters or something self inflicted
@@jordangiesbrecht05 ya I've seen their tests where they purposely destroyed the pump pretty impressive
Dude I got 6.7 with 347k on it zero issues , I did delited junk off of it after my warranty run out
What were your mods man
Could you pull the doors off a wrecked newer 6.7 and put it on yours?
You from NC? Thought you lived in Montana?
What led headlights are you running?
How you Replace the Turbo at all yet
May I ask what you paid for the truck?
Hey buddy, can you link me the brush guard you bought and use?
Nvm, ranch head lol
realtruck.com/p/ranch-hand-legend-series-grille-guard-front-bumper/v/ford/f250/2017/
You did 130 with toyo m/ts for long? Lol damn ballsy
On the off chance you see this, how are inspections now that it had some weight loss surgery? I'm in NC as well and looking to buy 20-22 (or 17-19 if I find the right one) truck next year. Also not a fan of new body style or the prices, but its hard to get away from those even used.
Had no issues with inspections and now I live in Montana. No inspections
get a stronger alternator then you make sure you have batteries with good cold crank and they will last awhile.
What are your thoughts on the new S&S CP4 to DCR pump?
I don’t know. Excited to see who’s it does.
I've seen alot of older trucks go 300/400k without any issues what so ever. A guy in town has a 90's f250 diesel that has well over 600k . I don't see anything made in the 2000's that can do that without major work .
2012 about 300k on the new motor 515k on the body. Work horse always pulling shit loaded down with tools
Had a 2003 duramax go 450k before I sold it with orignal motor and tranny, my work truck now is a 2006 duramax that has 310k on the clock and same thing. Hoping my 22 f250 holds up the same. Its all about maintenance, dont change your oil every 10k miles like they want you too cut it in half. Same with tranny, Ford says 150k service life on the tranny which is bs and they know it
my 2013 3500 is going on 450k with a 2k flatbed and a 1300lb welder the entire time and abt another 70k miles with a 5th wheel
i pray for the dude buying this after you good god
I looked up the 2023 F250 and yes I agree they are ugly more ugly then the newer tundras. The F250’s doesn’t show as much grille like they used too when they first started making them especially with the Lariants
Yeah. I just don’t like the trend of grill over headlights.
@@JacobOverman The snake pattern through the headlights on the 2023 serve no purpose and just tells the world Ford designers have no clue what they're doing!!! It just looks stupid beyone belief!!!!
Jesus, 23k on those tires! Holy cow they did not last. I have 57k on my Cooper XLT3's. Big lug all terrain tire. Low noise and I get 18 city 24 highway. I paid $240 per tire. I have at least 20k left on them. I have 16k towing 15k trailer
Yeah. These saw some excessive abuse though
My mom on her chevy got 120k out of her tires and still had tread left 😅
Mud Terrains don't last as long. I had the Cooper AT3 XLT on my 2017 F250 FX4 6.7, and got 50k and still had 9/32" on it before I tossed them for Micky Thompsons Baja Boss ATs. Burnouts and towing both wear tires out. You should measure your tires to gauge your average mileage per each /32" of rubber. Then measure then after you do some burn outs and see how many mile's of usage you are wasting doing burnouts.
I should do this at 160k review
Should!!
Your truck looks way better than the 2023s. Ford shot themselves in the back with that horrific ugly exterior styling not to mention the 4th grade design of the bar graph instruments!!!
I thought nc had emissions testing?
Not that I’m aware of
I agree the 23s are really ugly
Yeah I’m not a fan
@@JacobOverman I'm glad I'm not the only one with that opinion!!!
Good god y'all whine like women. Guaranteed in 2 years y'all are going to be singing the 23+ SD praises, because y'all are Ford guys, which means it's the best, and you've grown use to it's looks, etc. It happens every F'in time. I don't care if it's an 18 Mustang GT, 19 Silverado 1500, 19 Ram 1500, 2020 Silverado 2500, 07 GT500, C6 Corvette, etc, the fans of that series of vehicle always hate on that series newness at first, then accept it, and eventually learn to prefer it. I was like this with the 21 F150. I never thought that the 21 F150 was ugly, but I found it borning, and "meh" looking. Now, a few years later I've learned to appreciate it's simple, and clean design. When spec'd correctly a 23 SD is not ugly, but let's act like men here and deal with reality in an honest way, bed steps aren't intended to add in style, but are made to help in functionality, and easing the use of a tall, modern truck as a work vehicle. As a 2018 F150 FX4 owner I can saying in all honesty that GM's bumper/bed step setup is way better then Fords tailgate step setup. In fact the tailgate step sucks balls compared to the bumper steps when it comes to practically, easy of use, convenience, confidence inspiring, and solid feel when in use to move heavy items in, and out the bed, etc. The clean and hidden looks of the tailgate step do look better visually though. The real gist of it is that in reality GM's beds are the best in the business. They're big, not aluminum, and the multifunction tailgate is actually very useful, and better than anything Ford, FCA, Yota, or Nissan make.
I understand the importance of looks on a new, expensive truck, but the OP isn't the one to be complaining about it. First you're rocking an 8' bed on a non-DRW truck. You're obviously prioritizing functionality over looks here, as long beds are ugly, especially on crewcab trucks. (6.5' beds are ugly on crewcab half-tons) Unless you're a total redneck, the OP's front bumper does not add in improving upon the looks of a 2017 F250 Lariats frontend, but it's definitely looks pretty beefy, but heavy in both a good and bad way. Toolboxes mounted in the bed, do not help make trucks look better, but they can ade it function depending on what you use your truck for. Obviously the OP's F250 is far from the cream of the crop in terms of good looking 2017 SD truck, but it seems that he set it up to add value to it for him in his line of work, which 500 HP and 1,200 lb-ft OEM, a 10R140, and bedside/bumper steps do to the 2023 SD's, so why is the internet whining about it's style so much? A mid-2000's 6L PSD SRW SD with the 5 spoke 20's is a better looking truck than any style SD released since then. Does that make it a better truck than a modern 6.7L PSD truck? No. Should people say, "my 06 F250 FX4 looks better than a 23 F250, so I'm not going to upgrade, even though my 6L is costing me out my ass in repairs, and at 340K miles of hard use the whole truck's just tired. I depend on my truck for my business, and can easily afford to step into a newer one, but gee golly they sure don't look as good as my 06, so I'll just keep compromising my back health, and safety basic on my old, worn out truck, that see a lot of work looking better with its 5 spoke OEM wheels and no bed/bumper steps."
@@JROC734 And here is one that affects safety:
Of the 3 manufacturers mentioned, Ford is the only one with a major safety flaw in the design of their auto transmission!!!
• In an emergency, you can't push the shift lever from D into N with an open palm!!! This is not shifting in the normal sense by pulling up on the shift lever and changing gears!
• On Ram, Chevy, GMC as well as most other auto manufacturers you can do the emergency disconnect move - Honda, Toyota, BMW, Lexus, Audi, Mercedes, Nissan just to name a few!!!
• The same is true on Ford's console mounted auto transmissions - you can't do the above move but have to push the lockout button!!
• The whole idea behind this safety design is to allow the driver to disconnect the engine from the drivetrain without having to worry about putting the trans into Reverse! There is a safety detent and the transmission cannot go into Reverse with this emergency procedure!
• No dealer know about this because for some reason, the manufacturers do not publish this info!!! Try it - you just may be pleasantly surprised unless you own a Ford product!!!!
@@JROC734 Of all the HD truck manufacturers, Ford has the best styling even though, they messed up big time for the 23s. Remember, styling is a no cost design element and it is only the way it is executed that affects costs. Search TH-cam for the Huracan Tecnica and what Lamborghini did! You won't find Italian designers do amateur moves like Ford did!!! Take a look at that video, it is as amazing as the car is stunning in person!!!
4 k for manifolds lol
Throw tuner in trash and truck will last
Lmao
Aesthetically, Ford nailed it with the 17-22 Super Duty. The 23 is pretty fugly. Glad I bought a new 17 Platinum when I did.
new Superduty is ugly A.F.!