It's quite sad, that in many aspects mobile imaging has just about managed to surpass a 9 year old phone. I would expect a giant leap in picture quality for the sort of money thay are asking for these new flagships. It's quite pathetic actually.
First of all, a professional photographer would score S21 ultra higher in this video. Many people like yourself, do not see the big difference because you don't care about HDR, shadow details, bokeh effect, 4k resolution, super zoom, rgb colours, super wide angle camera, macro shot. New phones are also super thin, with batteries 4 to 5 times bigger than the 808 and still smaller. If companies wanted to make a 808 rival phone in 2021, it would be too thick and heavy that people would not buy.
I have to go and read the GSMArena review of the S21 Ultra to know whether this video is fake or not. Well, I'm happy to report that this video is definitely not fake at all. Even the photos on GSMArena review shows exactly the same quality as in this video.
@@GalacticaFan Funny you say that. A few days ago, I went to an authorized Samsung sales centre in a shopping mall nearby my home. There's an S21 Ultra on display and I took some photos with it. I even Bluetooth it to my phone so that I can personally analyze it back at home. Guess what? The same photo quality shown in this video is exactly the same as the photos I shot from that sales centre. It's crap.
Guys let me share this to you, i had nokia 808 and redminote10 pro, lately i test them both at board with letters far away The 808 much clearer because of Germany sensor carl Zeiss lens optics
When the lighting is good Nokia keeps up and in some pics to me looked a bit better. But as soon as HDR and nightmode start doing their thing S21U pulls ahead quite a bit. Plus it has OIS whis is huge. I wish a maker would take the idea of the 808 and utilize it today. With all the advances in post processing, AI, HDR, nightmode and silicone a phone like 808 would take amazing pictures you would think.
I thought of the same until I checked out GSMArena's S21 Ultra review. Sorry, but I cannot agree with you. The photo from GSMArena reviews shows exactly the same quality as in this video.
@Botko b While you are right about new update, it's only an update for the latest security patch. Heck, a lot of S21 users are still not yet to receive that new update.
That is a good point though. This channel once made a camera comparison between the Note20 Ultra and the Lumia 950 XL. It includes the unedited RAW shot in the video and the Note20 Ultra's RAW shot really does look good, almost better than the software-enhanced JPG shot.
How in the hell on God's green earth did you come up with that score I was laughing so hard when I saw that s*** you must be scoring this based on bias opinion and based on raw photos and then you gave the Nokia a higher score in low light photography get the hell out of here LOL
Well that shouldn't really be a surprise considering that the 808 doesn't have OIS. We see similar thing happened with the Nokia 9 PureView in lowlight conditions.
The Samsung only wins for lowlight and 10x zoom, but even that doesn't make me happy because of its oversharpening mess. EDIT: To see 16 people liking your comment really shows just how inept the knowledge im photography can be.
I'm with you man. The 808 was lightyears ahead of its time, but there absolutely no way it beat the S21U. I mean, the reviewer is entitled to their opinion, but that doesn't make them right.
@@philliplightning it's better in the same way am old corvette may be compared to a new one-- it'll seem like it'd be years behind, but since it was much more innovative at the time, it took years to hit the same glamour it originally had. Same goes for planes, notice how all planes are like 30 years old-- there's just not been enough of an improvement to replace the old ones yet
It shouldn't come as a surprise considering that the 808 doesn't have OIS and also has a rather dark aperture. That is why 808 low light photo is anything but great. It does looks natural and true to life, that's for sure.
What amazing comparsion What a great video Yhanks alot to you And my opnion about the camera i feel nokia the best of all ... but why we don't see it like other companies in this time ??
What we need is the sensor of the 808.... maybe mi 11 ultra... maybe but for now at least 808. That sensor with the very natural refined processing. But in addition to that all the other technology of today. Ois. Omni directional dual pixel focus. Samsung dual aperture of 1.5 and 2.4. Full pro mode options. Hdr and all that good stuff. All combined with the sensor size and natural color/processing of the 808.
Нокиа снимает живо и красиво, но всё же, посмотрев несколько видео на этом канале, я пришёл к выводу, что с резкостью у 808 проблемы, и по динамическому диапазону она не дотягивает до современных смартфонов. А что до S21U - то как будто у него нет никакой OIS. Постоянно микро смазы на вечерних снимках. Nokia же без стабилизатора чётко снимала.
Les photos du 808 sont bien plus naturelles ! Le flash Xénon est largement supérieur à ce que peut offrir un flash led. La photo mobile en 2021 est belle et bien marketing..
Thanks for the video, you really are the best! I still have my Nokia 808 but it hasn't turned on for about a year ... and I'm looking for a worthy replacement, but as you said in this comparison, the Samsung S21 Ultra also remains behind! in terms of resolution and detail as well as colors, the Nokia wins hands down! Currently I have the Xiaomi mi Note 10 with 1 / 1.33 "5x optical zoom sensor which is very good but the Nokia 808 is another planet! Can you tell me a smartphone equal to or higher than the nokia 808?
i would recommend you the huawei p40 pro, i have tried it in 2021 and it was like the phone camera was on another level compared to all the phones that i used (and i used a lot of smartphones). I felt like it was an alien phone.
Lol, have you see closely the lowlight shots, including the full res? It's a complete oversharpened joke for the Samsung. Even GSMArena themselves aren't that impressed with the 108MP photo. Heck, even the Samsung colour doesn't look right!
@@FAT8893 you can but its not good at it. Also he uaed 108mp mostly in cast conditions to make it less capable, avoided using night mode in low light, and did notbuse night nlde for low light zoom
No, It will not beat Nokia. I got a brand-new Nokia Lumia 1020. Now, My Canon M50 is sitting aside and eating the dust. Shame on Samsung. Xenon flash has no comparison.
I have similar experience with you, though not with the Lumia 1020. Since 2015, I used to own a Sony NEX-3N Mirrorless camera. That was like my first baby step into the world of photography. But since I bought a Lumia 950 XL back in 2018, that Sony camera was dusting on the shelf until I decided to sell it. Now, I only do photography from my Lumia.
Because there's too much emphasis on the algorithm for the pixel binning. Even Juha Alarkahu himself, the man who used to be the head of the Nokia and Microsoft camera department, even said that pixel binning sacrifices detail. You can see his tweet about it here: mobile.twitter.com/jalakarhu/status/1021695857786331136 Eventhough that tweet is from 2018, it is still relevant to this day as pixel binning technology didn't change at all.
Nokia still win for natural detail purity, that's for sure. I do find most Samsung photos in daylight look rather blueish to me. The HDR shot seems to have dialled down the blueish look, including the full-res version. If there's one thing I'm really not happy with the Samsung photo processing, it's the oversharpening! It's clearly visible on lowlight and 10x zoom shots. The Samsung may have better dynamic range than the Nokia in lowlight condition, but I'm totally not impressed with the oversharpening mess at all. That same oversharpening mess is even visible on the full-res version for crying out loud! You know what? I'm really not happy with the S21 Ultra image processing. The 9-in-1 Nona Bayer pixel binning and latest-gen OIS really should favour the Samsung in lowlight since it produced a much larger effective pixel size and can shoot at a much faster shutter speed than the Nokia. But the oversharpening mess really lets the whole photo quality down. P.S Now I'll just wait to see if Steve Litchfield from All About Windows Phone will do a camera comparison between the S21 Ultra and the 808.
There is still not a huge difference except of the night,macro,zoom shots,video. Well I think thats a huge difference sorry. Already all cameras are good in the daylight. But still It seems like I'll be rockin with my xz premium for 2-3more years.
I do agree with you when it comes to night, zoom and video as well. Smartphone cameras has come a really long way since the Nokia PureView days, and it really shows. It's just a crying shame that no modern smartphone can perfectly match the Nokia PureView's DSLR-like quality.
@@farishanafiah8461 unfortunately yes, It didnt come close to dslr quality. But for lumias no its nothing special and no way dslr like. No mobile camera is dslr like. Its just way ahead of its time and good in daylight. Just in daylight. Not usable in daily conditions. No macro no ai no bokeh no zoom no good video no slow mo no good video stabilisation no nothing. The best cameraphone would be nokia 9 pureview, that phone catches a HUGE data. A data that no other phone creates. Once you start editing the photos on it you see how amazing it is. All due respect to them But old lumias are not on that level and not usable.
@@kaganturktur The Nokia 9 PureView is great for RAW editing, but that's the only time I will use it for. For most of the time, I'd use my current Microsoft Lumia 950. I don't care much about macro since I don't do it anyway. AI is definitely not my thing as I much prefer total manual control. For bokeh, I much prefer the natural bokeh coming from the lens instead of some software interference. The lack of zoom is a good point after all, secondary zoom camera is not a thing during the Nokia PureView era. Video has really come a long way with new gen OIS and also the introduction of EIS. Realistically, I'd use a gimbal for video recording with my Lumia phones.
@@BlazeLord888 Lol please. If you really think this is fake, why would he went the struggle of putting ISO and shutter speed value on the video? He could have just not bother with it. Did Mrwhosetheboss done that? Fat chance!
@@BlazeLord888 But let's not forget that Nokia sensor is a native RGB Bayer filter with oversampling technique whereas the Samsung sensor is a Quad Bayer sensor with Bayer filter pixel binning. That's before we even go deeper into the complicated world of software algorithm like colour science and detail purity.
I actually do think it's because of the new chipset ISP. GSMArena made a side-by-side camera comparison between the S21 Ultra and the S20 Ultra, and even I'll admit that the S20 Ultra looks better than the S21 Ultra. While both phone do show some oversharpening, it's not that severe on the S20 Ultra.
You have to remember that the 808 has no OIS and it has dark aperture, so it can be noisy even on daylight. At least there's the built-in ND filter, so that's fine by me.
Amo todas as comparações feitas com os smartphones Nokia e com smartphones destas nova geração, e vejo que ao invés de progredirem parecem ter regredido, as câmeras destes novos dispositivos estão vindo com teor de contrastes altíssimos e as fotos passam por um processamento tão bruto que parecem desenhos que foram coloridos via software, sem contar que muitas das vezes já saem chapadas totalmente sem volume, o que não ocorre com alguns dispositivos da geração passada.
@@joshbonner9409 21 wins in hdr yes. However you can do image bracketing with the 808. So in a case where you can do that and then stack those images the 808 will do better in hdr. But thats clearly not an everybody or every situation type deal
Please, please, PLEASE remove or change that hideous background music! Also - the "final result" is laughable! I'm not a fan of Samsung, but the S21 just wipes the floor with the Nokia. In 99% of the photos!
![[TH] FS vs BME - VCT Ascension Pacific - Lower Bracket Final](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wnygqsR2Fig/mqdefault.jpg)
It's quite sad, that in many aspects mobile imaging has just about managed to surpass a 9 year old phone. I would expect a giant leap in picture quality for the sort of money thay are asking for these new flagships. It's quite pathetic actually.
Because modern smartphones focus too much on the software side.
I'm with you! That's why I just bought an S10e (coming from a Nokia N9, I sometimes regret it) instead of newer models...
First of all, a professional photographer would score S21 ultra higher in this video.
Many people like yourself, do not see the big difference because you don't care about HDR, shadow details, bokeh effect, 4k resolution, super zoom, rgb colours, super wide angle camera, macro shot.
New phones are also super thin, with batteries 4 to 5 times bigger than the 808 and still smaller. If companies wanted to make a 808 rival phone in 2021, it would be too thick and heavy that people would not buy.
@@FAT8893 no tf do u want a phone with 2012 ui
@@yeah8709 Believe it or not, Symbian is still active albeit under community update. Do check out Delight OS.
I have to go and read the GSMArena review of the S21 Ultra to know whether this video is fake or not. Well, I'm happy to report that this video is definitely not fake at all. Even the photos on GSMArena review shows exactly the same quality as in this video.
@@GalacticaFan Errr... no. Sorry, I can't agree with that.
@@GalacticaFan Funny you say that. A few days ago, I went to an authorized Samsung sales centre in a shopping mall nearby my home. There's an S21 Ultra on display and I took some photos with it. I even Bluetooth it to my phone so that I can personally analyze it back at home.
Guess what? The same photo quality shown in this video is exactly the same as the photos I shot from that sales centre. It's crap.
@@GalacticaFan No even I tried checking in gsmarena
@@farishanafiah8461 It's not crap but cameras are not evolved as pureview
Guys let me share this to you, i had nokia 808 and redminote10 pro, lately i test them both at board with letters far away
The 808 much clearer because of Germany sensor carl Zeiss lens optics
Nokia 808 best camera 👌👌👌
There hasn't been one video on this channel I haven't watched and disliked and this video is no different
808 > hardware
Samsung> software
@@adilalkanzy1820 he's talking about the difference in camera processing software and raw camera hardware, not Android itself.
For low-light shots please use manual mode on both camera. I have taken far better result on 808 in low lit scenes using M mode
808 full resolution destroy every phone camera
When the lighting is good Nokia keeps up and in some pics to me looked a bit better. But as soon as HDR and nightmode start doing their thing S21U pulls ahead quite a bit. Plus it has OIS whis is huge.
I wish a maker would take the idea of the 808 and utilize it today. With all the advances in post processing, AI, HDR, nightmode and silicone a phone like 808 would take amazing pictures you would think.
Imagine seeing 808 image processing software inside the S21 Ultra 108MP camera. That would be an oversampling monster right there.
Biased review
I thought of the same until I checked out GSMArena's S21 Ultra review. Sorry, but I cannot agree with you. The photo from GSMArena reviews shows exactly the same quality as in this video.
@@FAT8893 GSM Arena samples are before the update on the camera is miles ahead now
@@stx7389 Lol, the review was posted only a week ago and there is no update by the time I write this comment. 😒
@@FAT8893 there is
@Botko b While you are right about new update, it's only an update for the latest security patch. Heck, a lot of S21 users are still not yet to receive that new update.
I guess the only way to get ''pure'' unenhanced images from the Ultra is to shoot in RAW?
That is a good point though. This channel once made a camera comparison between the Note20 Ultra and the Lumia 950 XL. It includes the unedited RAW shot in the video and the Note20 Ultra's RAW shot really does look good, almost better than the software-enhanced JPG shot.
Definitely.
Glad I kept my 808,920 and 1020. Don’t need to overspend for today’s phones.
Maybe i'll buy one just for the sake of photography
Then used outdated phone only for camera? 😂
How in the hell on God's green earth did you come up with that score I was laughing so hard when I saw that s*** you must be scoring this based on bias opinion and based on raw photos and then you gave the Nokia a higher score in low light photography get the hell out of here LOL
808 is so noisy in low light and generally noisy altogether
Well that shouldn't really be a surprise considering that the 808 doesn't have OIS. We see similar thing happened with the Nokia 9 PureView in lowlight conditions.
@@farishanafiah8461 does Nokia 9 have no optical image stabilisation?
@@joshbonner9409 Yup, Nokia 9 PureView doesn't have OIS. Even its predecessor, the 8 Sirocco, also doesn't have OIS.
@@farishanafiah8461 that’s a bit sad
Nokia 8 have ois . Why Nokia
S21 is ❤
NOKIA IS INFINITY ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
@@rishis8714 now Nokia is 💩💩💩💩💩💩💩
I'm simply baffled by your score board. How the heck did you get to these points for 808 is beyond me.
The Samsung only wins for lowlight and 10x zoom, but even that doesn't make me happy because of its oversharpening mess.
EDIT: To see 16 people liking your comment really shows just how inept the knowledge im photography can be.
The S21 Ultra is oversharpend and get's less details as the Nokia 808, that has more details but also more noise.
I'm with you man. The 808 was lightyears ahead of its time, but there absolutely no way it beat the S21U. I mean, the reviewer is entitled to their opinion, but that doesn't make them right.
@Lucky Left Foot I'm not sure if I can agree with you when I look at the Samsung's lowlight shots. I've seen way better lowlight photo elsewhere.
@@philliplightning it's better in the same way am old corvette may be compared to a new one-- it'll seem like it'd be years behind, but since it was much more innovative at the time, it took years to hit the same glamour it originally had. Same goes for planes, notice how all planes are like 30 years old-- there's just not been enough of an improvement to replace the old ones yet
i like natural feel of 808 ,but low light is not that good to be fair
It shouldn't come as a surprise considering that the 808 doesn't have OIS and also has a rather dark aperture. That is why 808 low light photo is anything but great. It does looks natural and true to life, that's for sure.
@@FAT8893 i still consider lumia 950 was best from all , i always keep 950 with me :)
@@reincarnationcsgo2531 I'm still using my Lumia 950 as my daily driver. The camera is still a great performer to this day.
Yeah 950 is a keeper for sure no matter the fact i got P30 Pro with really good camera and weak flash. Nokia 4ever💪
Nokia is not bat it just realistic.
Love from Bangladesh, love is Nokia
Nokia is still thé Best
I hope you compare also with Xiaomi Mi 11 ultra and Mate 40 pro, because the first have a big size of capteur
Yes please!
Defeating the nokia camera 😂😂 no way nokia is legendary 😘😉 cannot be beaten in future coming smartphones 👍❤️ "NOKIA"
Yeah now lets see a video test and we see wins that 🤣🤣
Still nokia is alive
What amazing comparsion
What a great video
Yhanks alot to you
And my opnion about the camera i feel nokia the best of all ... but why we don't see it like other companies in this time ??
There will never be a phone like 808 to the world again
Smartphone brands of today are focusing too much on the software side. The Nokia proves that hardware physics is still relevant and important.
Don't worry, someday there will be phones like nokia lumia and nokia 808, and they will rule the world.
What we need is the sensor of the 808.... maybe mi 11 ultra... maybe but for now at least 808.
That sensor with the very natural refined processing.
But in addition to that all the other technology of today. Ois. Omni directional dual pixel focus. Samsung dual aperture of 1.5 and 2.4.
Full pro mode options. Hdr and all that good stuff.
All combined with the sensor size and natural color/processing of the 808.
Nokia n 808 camera pro vs Samsung s 21
s21 ultra is much better the 808 already a cell phone from 2013 in camera is already weak but I choose the s21
color dynamic range of 808 is nuts
watching in eizo coloredge in my office's pc
We are waiting for more.
Нокиа снимает живо и красиво, но всё же, посмотрев несколько видео на этом канале, я пришёл к выводу, что с резкостью у 808 проблемы, и по динамическому диапазону она не дотягивает до современных смартфонов. А что до S21U - то как будто у него нет никакой OIS. Постоянно микро смазы на вечерних снимках. Nokia же без стабилизатора чётко снимала.
Nokia 1020 vs 808 pv 👀👀👀👀
I have 1020, bring your Sony alpha..lol
Les photos du 808 sont bien plus naturelles ! Le flash Xénon est largement supérieur à ce que peut offrir un flash led. La photo mobile en 2021 est belle et bien marketing..
S21 Ultra is better in HDR, color reproduction and white balance, but it is a bit oversharpened. 808 looks clean without overdoing the details
В каком городе живёт автор этих видеороликов?
I still take photos on my 808 😂
6:27 nokia is macro bad :)
It is clear from the full resolution section that the s21 is not true 108 megapixels.
Karena saya punya nokia 808 pureview. Saya menjagokan nokia 808 pureview
jual om?
Thanks for the video, you really are the best! I still have my Nokia 808 but it hasn't turned on for about a year ... and I'm looking for a worthy replacement, but as you said in this comparison, the Samsung S21 Ultra also remains behind! in terms of resolution and detail as well as colors, the Nokia wins hands down! Currently I have the Xiaomi mi Note 10 with 1 / 1.33 "5x optical zoom sensor which is very good but the Nokia 808 is another planet! Can you tell me a smartphone equal to or higher than the nokia 808?
i would recommend you the huawei p40 pro, i have tried it in 2021 and it was like the phone camera was on another level compared to all the phones that i used (and i used a lot of smartphones). I felt like it was an alien phone.
What a joke of a video, how the 808 scored more points then the S21U is beyond me. Pretty much every photo was better on the S21
Lol, have you see closely the lowlight shots, including the full res? It's a complete oversharpened joke for the Samsung. Even GSMArena themselves aren't that impressed with the 108MP photo. Heck, even the Samsung colour doesn't look right!
@@FAT8893 108mp is npt for lowlight!
@@stx7389 What do you mean not for lowlight? You can still use it!
@@FAT8893 you can but its not good at it. Also he uaed 108mp mostly in cast conditions to make it less capable, avoided using night mode in low light, and did notbuse night nlde for low light zoom
@@stx7389 Because the guy behind this channel only uses night mode if the colours are still Natural then.
No, It will not beat Nokia. I got a brand-new Nokia Lumia 1020. Now, My Canon M50 is sitting aside and eating the dust. Shame on Samsung. Xenon flash has no comparison.
I have similar experience with you, though not with the Lumia 1020. Since 2015, I used to own a Sony NEX-3N Mirrorless camera. That was like my first baby step into the world of photography. But since I bought a Lumia 950 XL back in 2018, that Sony camera was dusting on the shelf until I decided to sell it. Now, I only do photography from my Lumia.
The background music made it awesome
Nokia Super Good! As for 2012.
😮🥵
why do all the top of the range in comparison with the old Nokia take out pictures that look flat and fake?
Because there's too much emphasis on the algorithm for the pixel binning. Even Juha Alarkahu himself, the man who used to be the head of the Nokia and Microsoft camera department, even said that pixel binning sacrifices detail. You can see his tweet about it here: mobile.twitter.com/jalakarhu/status/1021695857786331136
Eventhough that tweet is from 2018, it is still relevant to this day as pixel binning technology didn't change at all.
@@farishanafiah8461 If you don't zoom like 500% + the detail on the 108mp is insane, especially with scene optimizer off
@@stx7389 The detail on a 108MP shooter equals about as many details as an 30MP photo
Maybe your eyes are bent
@@rishis8714 nope
Do compare with nokia 1020 model
th-cam.com/video/3R5WJJoB8O4/w-d-xo.html
Nokia still win for natural detail purity, that's for sure. I do find most Samsung photos in daylight look rather blueish to me. The HDR shot seems to have dialled down the blueish look, including the full-res version.
If there's one thing I'm really not happy with the Samsung photo processing, it's the oversharpening! It's clearly visible on lowlight and 10x zoom shots. The Samsung may have better dynamic range than the Nokia in lowlight condition, but I'm totally not impressed with the oversharpening mess at all. That same oversharpening mess is even visible on the full-res version for crying out loud!
You know what? I'm really not happy with the S21 Ultra image processing. The 9-in-1 Nona Bayer pixel binning and latest-gen OIS really should favour the Samsung in lowlight since it produced a much larger effective pixel size and can shoot at a much faster shutter speed than the Nokia. But the oversharpening mess really lets the whole photo quality down.
P.S Now I'll just wait to see if Steve Litchfield from All About Windows Phone will do a camera comparison between the S21 Ultra and the 808.
Nokia Amazing
There is still not a huge difference except of the night,macro,zoom shots,video. Well I think thats a huge difference sorry. Already all cameras are good in the daylight. But still It seems like I'll be rockin with my xz premium for 2-3more years.
I do agree with you when it comes to night, zoom and video as well. Smartphone cameras has come a really long way since the Nokia PureView days, and it really shows. It's just a crying shame that no modern smartphone can perfectly match the Nokia PureView's DSLR-like quality.
@@farishanafiah8461 unfortunately yes, It didnt come close to dslr quality. But for lumias no its nothing special and no way dslr like. No mobile camera is dslr like. Its just way ahead of its time and good in daylight. Just in daylight. Not usable in daily conditions. No macro no ai no bokeh no zoom no good video no slow mo no good video stabilisation no nothing. The best cameraphone would be nokia 9 pureview, that phone catches a HUGE data. A data that no other phone creates. Once you start editing the photos on it you see how amazing it is. All due respect to them But old lumias are not on that level and not usable.
@@kaganturktur The Nokia 9 PureView is great for RAW editing, but that's the only time I will use it for. For most of the time, I'd use my current Microsoft Lumia 950. I don't care much about macro since I don't do it anyway. AI is definitely not my thing as I much prefer total manual control. For bokeh, I much prefer the natural bokeh coming from the lens instead of some software interference. The lack of zoom is a good point after all, secondary zoom camera is not a thing during the Nokia PureView era. Video has really come a long way with new gen OIS and also the introduction of EIS. Realistically, I'd use a gimbal for video recording with my Lumia phones.
@@farishanafiah8461 OK
@@farishanafiah8461 On no day smartphone can match dslr. Plastic lenses...There are lot of limitations in mobile camera
9 year difference in time
All over 25 % difference in camera
Is it Norway? Btw, create video!
That was in Finland.
Please brother upload video regularly
Liar, when mrwhosetheboss tested the results were different!!
Lol, you trust that influencer sellout? He doesn't even know how to take a good photo. 😂🤣😂🤣
@@farishanafiah8461 but this one your watching is a fake review
@@farishanafiah8461 the Nokia has a 41 mp sensor samsung has 108 mp sensor
@@BlazeLord888 Lol please. If you really think this is fake, why would he went the struggle of putting ISO and shutter speed value on the video? He could have just not bother with it. Did Mrwhosetheboss done that? Fat chance!
@@BlazeLord888 But let's not forget that Nokia sensor is a native RGB Bayer filter with oversampling technique whereas the Samsung sensor is a Quad Bayer sensor with Bayer filter pixel binning. That's before we even go deeper into the complicated world of software algorithm like colour science and detail purity.
Just curious, why did the S20 ultra score better, and the S20 FE even more so?
I actually do think it's because of the new chipset ISP. GSMArena made a side-by-side camera comparison between the S21 Ultra and the S20 Ultra, and even I'll admit that the S20 Ultra looks better than the S21 Ultra. While both phone do show some oversharpening, it's not that severe on the S20 Ultra.
@@farishanafiah8461 again, this was before the update
s21 destroyed nokia 808 in all aspects . This scoring is stupid .
All aspects? Lol please, not a chance. The lowlight is an oversharpened mess and the colour is a total joke. Even the 108MP shot is terrible.
@@farishanafiah8461 I think not real 108MP shots
@@farishanafiah8461 Did he use night mode on s21 ultra ?
@@pastalavista03 3:45. Don't you even watch the video at all? 😑
@@pastalavista03 Very funny
Nokia 808 is pretty poor allround camera. Maybe with some manual control you can make some great pictures.
You have to remember that the 808 has no OIS and it has dark aperture, so it can be noisy even on daylight. At least there's the built-in ND filter, so that's fine by me.
What! I didn't hear you.
Over sharpening in modern sensors is criminal!
Exactly! Really not impressed with the lowlight and 10x zoom shots. I mean, what the heck is going on with the 10x zoom photos? It looks so wrong!
I would sell all my smartphone for buy only the 808 Pureview. This is the only cameraphone!
The 1020 pureview had a similar sensor and it was much more modern with oled screen, selfie camera and apps and windows phone
i got s 21 u i love it fast compare with nokia ... snap dragon 888
Amo todas as comparações feitas com os smartphones Nokia e com smartphones destas nova geração, e vejo que ao invés de progredirem parecem ter regredido, as câmeras destes novos dispositivos estão vindo com teor de contrastes altíssimos e as fotos passam por um processamento tão bruto que parecem desenhos que foram coloridos via software, sem contar que muitas das vezes já saem chapadas totalmente sem volume, o que não ocorre com alguns dispositivos da geração passada.
first
Wow 808 rocks
808 is still good! But today’s HDR in cameras is way better. So s21 wins with better resolved details.
808 is more noisy too
And 808 is crap in low light
You Nokia people are so incredibly biased,. just because you don’t like a brand. Nokia was great in its time, I even loved Nokia and had Nokia
@@joshbonner9409 21 wins in hdr yes. However you can do image bracketing with the 808. So in a case where you can do that and then stack those images the 808 will do better in hdr.
But thats clearly not an everybody or every situation type deal
LOL
So the 808 didn't win one comparison. Are you on drugs?
Lol, the Nokia still wins in daylight and 3x zoom. Samsung's oversharpening mess is utterly terrible on lowlight and 10x zoom shot.
@@farishanafiah8461 Oh yes, I see that. They are indeed terrible. Didn't win one comparison my arse. 😂🤣😂🤣
10 years difference, 25% difference.
Please, please, PLEASE remove or change that hideous background music! Also - the "final result" is laughable! I'm not a fan of Samsung, but the S21 just wipes the floor with the Nokia. In 99% of the photos!
Nokia has better colours