He talks about male hierarchies, and immediately says that it's down to the choices of women, but then it's a female hierarchy then. In all the male social groups I've been in, there's very little hierarchy, just a group of friends working together, even if there is a leader, they will always be open to suggestion.
You completely missed the point really. Also putting the little personal experience you have into this argument doesn't change the underlying implications of a biologically forced hierarchy and doesn't help you strengthen your statement because it's not enough sample size.
The male hierarchy is largely predicated on their access to women, but it doesn't mean women dominate that hierarchy in any way. It's the same for women, however less implicit, and they use very different strategies in their game of dominance over other women.
I cant tell u the times Ive been rejected. Alot of this is bogus. Women will be with some very pathetic men, simply due to similar interests or sub-cultural influence (rap videos, movies, etc.). So much of sexual selection is a fabrication, a cultural fabrication. It boils down to... how many resources (material, emotional, psychological) can you posses. Especially attention/fame/popularity. Women want a man who is digital, who has followers, who utilizes the internet. It's all hyperreality. Or if you associate/mimic someone popular/famous...
Nah dude. Women only unconsciously use fame or resources as a marker for competence/ skills and generosity which is what they are biologically drawn to just like us guys use beauty as a marker for health…
He talks about male hierarchies, and immediately says that it's down to the choices of women, but then it's a female hierarchy then. In all the male social groups I've been in, there's very little hierarchy, just a group of friends working together, even if there is a leader, they will always be open to suggestion.
You completely missed the point really. Also putting the little personal experience you have into this argument doesn't change the underlying implications of a biologically forced hierarchy and doesn't help you strengthen your statement because it's not enough sample size.
The male hierarchy is largely predicated on their access to women, but it doesn't mean women dominate that hierarchy in any way. It's the same for women, however less implicit, and they use very different strategies in their game of dominance over other women.
Did Peterson just say Baldwin Effect?
Was Kim Jon Il right about Arrec Balwin being worthless?
I cant tell u the times Ive been rejected. Alot of this is bogus. Women will be with some very pathetic men, simply due to similar interests or sub-cultural influence (rap videos, movies, etc.). So much of sexual selection is a fabrication, a cultural fabrication. It boils down to... how many resources (material, emotional, psychological) can you posses. Especially attention/fame/popularity. Women want a man who is digital, who has followers, who utilizes the internet. It's all hyperreality. Or if you associate/mimic someone popular/famous...
Nah man. You probably got rejected because you lack social skills.
Nah dude. Women only unconsciously use fame or resources as a marker for competence/ skills and generosity which is what they are biologically drawn to just like us guys use beauty as a marker for health…