Your reflection is one that I also had while listening to Dr Cobb. I feel that if I can speak something like with his clarity, simplicity, humility and wisdom when I have reached his age I will have lived my life quite well.
This might well have been subtitled, "Why No Cosmology?" Dr. Cobb outlines the revolution in Philosophy brought about by Whitehead in a refreshingly jargon-free inspiring way. 🤔 (Green Fire UK) 🌈🦉
Dr. Cobb's "Whitehead Word Book" is a brilliant, accessible introduction to Whitehead. It is also a great reference book. I couldn't get through Process and Reality without it.
I attended Washburn University in the late 90’s and had a couple of classes under Jorge Luis Nobo, now deceased, who had undertaken the task described here. Had I known what I know now after watching this video, I can’t help but feel regret at leaving when I did. I guess it’s never too late. All paths are blind alleys but some are better than others and we have new blind alleys to discover for ourselves and make our own.
So true,,❤❤,,the science and philosophy are not working in the most comprehensive way ,,,where in the quantum world and existentialism is so crucial to study to understand.❤❤ thankyou so much ❤❤
Epistemology = the systematic study of Knowledge, Understanding and Wisdom. Reality = That which is/That I am. Knowledge = the portion of Reality that is known experientially (Gnosis). Understanding = Knowing how to apply what has been learned from experience to experience. Wisdom = Competent application of Knowledge (expertise, excellence). The Light of Wisdom and Understanding dispels the darkness of ignorance and folly. The Word of Truth is ever faithful (loyal, true, isomorphic) to Reality (That which is). The smallest atomic unit of experience is an impression. An impression is a bundle of qualities received through the 5 senses, which the brain organizes into something recognizable we call a perception. Perception is the brain's identification system, answering the questions of what, who, how, why, where, when, etc. What we actually experience are the qualities of our perception. The brain derives meaning from the 'drivers'; those qualities that change our inner state of Being as they change. Someone with a visual driver of distance will feel more or less positive, negative or neutral as an image moves farther away, becoming smaller and darker, and feel the opposite as the image moves closer, getting bigger and brighter. Perspective provides the context of meaning. Perspectives are formed and emerge from 4 primary metaprograms: Inner/Outer More/Less Better/Worse For/not For Creative Process/Inquiry/Insight: Mentation - Metanoia - Mutation 1. Immersion (mentation) 2. Saturation 3. Incubation 4. Fruition (metanoia) 5. Confirmation (mutation) 6. Implementation 7. Calibration Ask a compelling question as you fall asleep, receive a compelling answer as you wake up.
I studied Whitehead under David Griffen at the Claremont School of Theology way back in the 1980s and have been a disciple of Whitehead ever since. What I especially appreciate about Whitehead‘s philosophy is in jettisoning the conventional two realm conception of reality made up of the really real, objective realm, and the not so real, subjective realm. There is instead only one reality. That of experience.
“Process and Reality” is an extremely complicated book on its own, but many thanks to Proffesor Cobb for simplifying to us the Cosmology involving technical terminologies found in Whiteheadian philosophy.
There is nothing complicated about 'process and reality', Whitehead found a simple solution to creation as 'accident' explain everything to him. But to me the answer was not scientific and not even metaphysical.
Technical terminologies of Whitehead's philosophy. Out of the mind that wasn't aware of the torrid meteor field. That wasn't aware of the possibility of a meteor field that we pass through 2 times a yr; that has been destroying life for at least 66 million yrs. Rome after 70 AD, the formation of Christianity and the and end of Sanhedrin, free age of the Rabbi. Mithra became Christianity, the Rabbi's invented a new Palestine. Forgotten the old technology of compression crystal electricity.
I have a limited education, (2 yr engineering degree) but Whithead's "process" philosophy was not difficult for me to understand. However, I believe it encompasses much more than "cosmology".
I didn't read much Whitehead's work. But i was introduced to his work many years ago in philosophy of religión lecturer. Quite faschinating. However, if i'm not wrong, he made God a becoming being. Not a Being as such but one who becomes. In that sense, God is no more than exalted and a little bit sophesticated being who is becoming in parralel with created beings. As Dr. Cobb, points out why Whitehead is bcos of the emergence of new Scientfic knoweldge. In other, it seems to me, what he set out to do was to harmonize his philosophy not only with Darwinian evolutionary biology but also the evolution of cosmos. Indeed, the advance of knoweldge from premitive age, in microlevel, seem to coincide with this macro level evolution as the basis of becoming or process philosophy and thelogy. It's an ambitious attempt at explaining reality. Yet, some of us are not convinced just bcos of the disagreement on the very fundamental issue i.e. God. The God of Bible He who said I Am who Am, with no Beginning and no End, can't be a becoming being.
On the contrary God has become man, God does not become absorbed by Man because everyone including God must have their own individuality and at the same time their absolute unity God is not a limited being
I've had Whitehead's book for many years. I had so much trouble understanding, but after doing a serious study of Aristotle it does clarify a lot of Whitehead's train of thought. It's easier to think of Whitehead's theory of actual occasions/entities as Aristotelian substances (potentiality/actuality) on steroids, but a shift from "substance"/object thinking to "event" thinking. Obviously Whitehead is much more than this but it does help.
Excelente!!! En breve voy a ponerme a leer Proces and Reality de Whithead. Estoy terminando mi tesis de Licenciatura en la noción de cuerpo en el Discurso de Metafísica de Leibniz y encuentro grandes similitudes entre sus ideas. Saludos desde Argentina!!
The Dualism that Prof Cobb speaks against is the Substance of Descartes and others. When we replace Substance with Process, we can remake Dualism into a workable form. I recommend the ideas that where put forward by Prof Vaughan Pratt in his paper Rational Mechanics and Natural Mathematics.
Look into Debrogile-Bohm, the quantum level of our world relates to the structure of what we would call biological determinism. Biology has a place in quantum physics.
Hello, friends! Wonderful class by Professor Cobb. Would you allow me to translate this video and make it available in Brazilian Portuguese. Thank you!
One who I have always enjoyed is Xavier Zubiri. He seems to have looked at the same problems of cosmology and developed a philosophy that focused on the dynamic structures of reality. Most of his work is in Spanish but I really enjoyed reading him. He was quite the polymath and studied with several great minds of the era (such as Schrodinger and Zermelo). Whitehead is among my favorites, especially through the work of the late Fr. Bernard Lee who drew me deeper towards Whitehead during my days in college.
@@brynbstn I would suggest his essays in “Nature History and God” and the book “Dynamic Structure of Reality” as good introductions. His main book is “On Essence” which breaks down his mature philosophy. For his theological ideas, “Man and God” is his best. His last book, Sentient Intelligence was his magnum opus for epistemology.
It's a tough one- especially because Whitehead uses his own unique terms to describe concepts that aren't always clear or concise. I dug into it for 8+ months for my undergrad thesis and, in some ways, still felt like I hadn't fully grasped it. If you have a background in physics you'll be much better off though.
@@word-pictures I don’t have a background in physics. I have never taken a single physics course at university. I do find cosmology, astronomy and quantum physics interesting however.
@@leiferiksson5548 I didn't either. Either way, I think you'll enjoy it if you're attracted to Whitehead's thinking and process philosophy in general :)
Profound way of world view,,,so true.these things are all mentioned in Torah and Bible and Quran.. Spirituality and imagination to see beyond the seen and see from your mind's eye the unseen as well❤❤
Whitehead sought to define what Aristotle demonstrated as meaningless, the continuous is not divisible: a line is not composed of points (dimensionless); time is not composed of 'nows'. 'Now' is not in time, having no dimension of duration, and would not be missed if subtracted from a 'second'. Hume and Kant ignored Aristotle, who can be the basis of cosmological thought that includes quantum reality by being fully true to his Categories, On Interpretation, etc.
I've come to abandon the moral and non-coersive assumptions that undergird process theology... but his vision of how reality works? The definitions? The hard parts? I've never seen a vision more brilliant than whiteheads.
@@brynbstn non-coercive. As in, process theology is rooted in assumptions about God's method of divine intervention being totally non-coersive... and by non-coercive they mean, no overt applications of force that impose his will will anything sentient at all ever. Which rules out most miracle claims.
Thanks for letting us know Dylan. I contacted Tripp, and he should be getting in touch soon. Please let us know (at cobb.institute/contact/) if you don't hear back within the next few days.
An interesting lecture but failed to cover the subject title in any depth. The lecture should really be titled a lecture on cosmology, not the work of Whitehead.
Here is the proof for the Construct theory: Infinity = 1/x(change) + 1 This equation is God's mathematical name. God's name in this equation reads: God's Mind Is Man Changed With God. Breakdown: God's mind is infinite. In math this measure out as the set of infinity In math (1/x) represents a fraction of a whole. Any child is a fraction of a parent and man according to the Bible is God's child. Therefore man is a fraction of God Change in math is represented by the Greek letter (delta) and it denotes a difference of some kind. Plus (+) in math means to combine or add something with something. There is only one God. In math the number 1 means something or someone is complete and individual from all the rest. Spelled out: God's Mind (Infinity) is (=) Man (1/x) Changed ( delta) With (+) God (1). Scientific Method Step 1 Observation: Math can deliver unbreakable truths such as 2+2 will always = 4 Step 2 Question: Do math and Divinity share a common truth? Step 3 Hypothesis: If God exist He should be found in the house of mathematics Step 4 Prediction: God's Mind Is Man Change With God is an equation Step 5 Test: Any number (Infinity) is (=) a set in space (1/x) that change (x^2) with (+) space (1)) Again: All and any number is a set in space that change with space Note: "X" describes any set, (1) describes any kind of space physical or otherwise This equation tells us why 2 feet is not the same as 2 inches. Both distances are measured out as 2 units of space but there is a change or difference between both units. They are each sets in a space of distance but they represent changes in their measurement of distance. Step 6 Iterate: New look at what makes up reality. Reality consist of 3 domains of space a. Fractured space or matter b. spatial expansion or energy c. Complete or unbroken space or the whole of knowledge a.k.a. information
Step 7 Conclusion: We now know Infinity is real therefore the value in enumeration demand God exist otherwise the domain for enumeration would be incomplete. We know the domain for enumeration is complete because we can count. God must be able to count too all the way to Infinity because His mathematical name tells us what is any number. As we can see God is fundamental in the cross between information and physical relationships I wrote a research doc looking deeper into this matter. Anyone who wants a free copy can contact me at: william.mabon@yahoo.com God's Mind Is Man Changed With God
he is very Whiteheadian in cosmological/metaphysical orientation. also at general philosophical home with James, Peirce, Dewey... value-realist/denounces scientific materialism as nihilistic & lacking any coherent description of teleological causation (final/formal causes); although he is highly inclusive of the scientific enterprise in his overall approach, as pertains to energy dynamics/ mathematical models as critical/relevant tools. + considers reality, most precisely, as a process of actualizing potential/possibilities... and that there are intuitive, archetypal forms that guide this process towards MORE GOOD, MORE BEAUTIFUL possibilities... the parallels are there. he just isn't explicit about the idealism/possible panpsychism...
@@vasey6635 either I like you, or yoy carrying a card. Lijed what you wrote though. So why did JP end up with brain damage in your understanding ? What was the exact etiology of his most serious blow?
![[ TEASER ] เงาะป่า - วงL.กฮ. | TMG RECORD](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/M4ObdFfcPww/mqdefault.jpg)
What a beautiful, thoughtful, engaging and admirably humble lecture! I could listen for hours and hours more.
Your reflection is one that I also had while listening to Dr Cobb. I feel that if I can speak something like with his clarity, simplicity, humility and wisdom when I have reached his age I will have lived my life quite well.
What an EXCEPTIONAL educator. Very clear. Defines complex ideas in context! Wonderful!!!
This might well have been subtitled, "Why No Cosmology?" Dr. Cobb outlines the revolution in Philosophy brought about by Whitehead in a refreshingly jargon-free inspiring way. 🤔 (Green Fire UK) 🌈🦉
Dr. Cobb's "Whitehead Word Book" is a brilliant, accessible introduction to Whitehead. It is also a great reference book. I couldn't get through Process and Reality without it.
I attended Washburn University in the late 90’s and had a couple of classes under Jorge Luis Nobo, now deceased, who had undertaken the task described here. Had I known what I know now after watching this video, I can’t help but feel regret at leaving when I did. I guess it’s never too late. All paths are blind alleys but some are better than others and we have new blind alleys to discover for ourselves and make our own.
admirably slow and clear speaker
inspirational, thank you very much
So true,,❤❤,,the science and philosophy are not working in the most comprehensive way ,,,where in the quantum world and existentialism is so crucial to study to understand.❤❤ thankyou so much ❤❤
Epistemology = the systematic study of Knowledge, Understanding and Wisdom.
Reality = That which is/That I am.
Knowledge = the portion of Reality that is known experientially (Gnosis).
Understanding = Knowing how to apply what has been learned from experience to experience.
Wisdom = Competent application of Knowledge (expertise, excellence).
The Light of Wisdom and Understanding dispels the darkness of ignorance and folly.
The Word of Truth is ever faithful (loyal, true, isomorphic) to Reality (That which is).
The smallest atomic unit of experience is an impression. An impression is a bundle of qualities received through the 5 senses, which the brain organizes into something recognizable we call a perception.
Perception is the brain's identification system, answering the questions of what, who, how, why, where, when, etc.
What we actually experience are the qualities of our perception. The brain derives meaning from the 'drivers'; those qualities that change our inner state of Being as they change.
Someone with a visual driver of distance will feel more or less positive, negative or neutral as an image moves farther away, becoming smaller and darker, and feel the opposite as the image moves closer, getting bigger and brighter.
Perspective provides the context of meaning. Perspectives are formed and emerge from 4 primary metaprograms:
Inner/Outer
More/Less
Better/Worse
For/not For
Creative Process/Inquiry/Insight:
Mentation - Metanoia - Mutation
1. Immersion (mentation)
2. Saturation
3. Incubation
4. Fruition (metanoia)
5. Confirmation (mutation)
6. Implementation
7. Calibration
Ask a compelling question as you fall asleep, receive a compelling answer as you wake up.
I studied Whitehead under David Griffen at the Claremont School of Theology way back in the 1980s and have been a disciple of Whitehead ever since. What I especially appreciate about Whitehead‘s philosophy is in jettisoning the conventional two realm conception of reality made up of the really real, objective realm, and the not so real, subjective realm. There is instead only one reality. That of experience.
Sounds like phenomenology.
“Process and Reality” is an extremely complicated book on its own, but many thanks to Proffesor Cobb for simplifying to us the Cosmology involving technical terminologies found in Whiteheadian philosophy.
There is nothing complicated about 'process and reality', Whitehead found a simple solution to creation as 'accident' explain everything to him. But to me the answer was not scientific and not even metaphysical.
Technical terminologies of Whitehead's philosophy. Out of the mind that wasn't aware of the torrid meteor field. That wasn't aware of the possibility of a meteor field that we pass through 2 times a yr; that has been destroying life for at least 66 million yrs. Rome after 70 AD, the formation of Christianity and the and end of Sanhedrin, free age of the Rabbi. Mithra became Christianity, the Rabbi's invented a new Palestine. Forgotten the old technology of compression crystal electricity.
Is this the symbolic logic food guy?
I was introduced to Whitehead at the University of West Georgia while getting my MA in psychology! It was a very humanistic program then.
Fascinating! Who was it that introduced Whitehead's ideas at UWG, and what it in any way connected with their (para)psychology department?
For me it was Chris Anstoos, now retired professor in the psychology department@@stephenbarrell7821
This book is a work of art
I have a limited education, (2 yr engineering degree) but Whithead's "process" philosophy was not difficult for me to understand. However, I believe it encompasses much more than "cosmology".
Amen, brother.
I didn't read much Whitehead's work. But i was introduced to his work many years ago in philosophy of religión lecturer. Quite faschinating. However, if i'm not wrong, he made God a becoming being. Not a Being as such but one who becomes. In that sense, God is no more than exalted and a little bit sophesticated being who is becoming in parralel with created beings. As Dr. Cobb, points out why Whitehead is bcos of the emergence of new Scientfic knoweldge. In other, it seems to me, what he set out to do was to harmonize his philosophy not only with Darwinian evolutionary biology but also the evolution of cosmos. Indeed, the advance of knoweldge from premitive age, in microlevel, seem to coincide with this macro level evolution as the basis of becoming or process philosophy and thelogy. It's an ambitious attempt at explaining reality. Yet, some of us are not convinced just bcos of the disagreement on the very fundamental issue i.e. God. The God of Bible He who said I Am who Am, with no Beginning and no End, can't be a becoming being.
On the contrary God has become man, God does not become absorbed by Man because everyone including God must have their own individuality and at the same time their absolute unity
God is not a limited being
I've had Whitehead's book for many years. I had so much trouble understanding, but after doing a serious study of Aristotle it does clarify a lot of Whitehead's train of thought. It's easier to think of Whitehead's theory of actual occasions/entities as Aristotelian substances (potentiality/actuality) on steroids, but a shift from "substance"/object thinking to "event" thinking. Obviously Whitehead is much more than this but it does help.
This is so fucking beautiful. Thank you.
This is fantastic. Thank you.
Thank you
Excelente!!! En breve voy a ponerme a leer Proces and Reality de Whithead. Estoy terminando mi tesis de Licenciatura en la noción de cuerpo en el Discurso de Metafísica de Leibniz y encuentro grandes similitudes entre sus ideas. Saludos desde Argentina!!
Excellent....
The Dualism that Prof Cobb speaks against is the Substance of Descartes and others. When we replace Substance with Process, we can remake Dualism into a workable form. I recommend the ideas that where put forward by Prof Vaughan Pratt in his paper Rational Mechanics and Natural Mathematics.
When the candle goes out, does the room evaporate?
Ooh here’s the good shit. It does not. All processes are an accumulation.
Look into Debrogile-Bohm, the quantum level of our world relates to the structure of what we would call biological determinism. Biology has a place in quantum physics.
Hello, friends! Wonderful class by Professor Cobb. Would you allow me to translate this video and make it available in Brazilian Portuguese. Thank you!
One who I have always enjoyed is Xavier Zubiri. He seems to have looked at the same problems of cosmology and developed a philosophy that focused on the dynamic structures of reality. Most of his work is in Spanish but I really enjoyed reading him. He was quite the polymath and studied with several great minds of the era (such as Schrodinger and Zermelo). Whitehead is among my favorites, especially through the work of the late Fr. Bernard Lee who drew me deeper towards Whitehead during my days in college.
What would you recommend by Zubiri in English?
@@brynbstn I would suggest his essays in “Nature History and God” and the book “Dynamic Structure of Reality” as good introductions. His main book is “On Essence” which breaks down his mature philosophy. For his theological ideas, “Man and God” is his best. His last book, Sentient Intelligence was his magnum opus for epistemology.
I haven't started this book yet, really looking forward to it though.
It's a tough one- especially because Whitehead uses his own unique terms to describe concepts that aren't always clear or concise. I dug into it for 8+ months for my undergrad thesis and, in some ways, still felt like I hadn't fully grasped it. If you have a background in physics you'll be much better off though.
@@word-pictures I don’t have a background in physics. I have never taken a single physics course at university. I do find cosmology, astronomy and quantum physics interesting however.
@@leiferiksson5548 I didn't either. Either way, I think you'll enjoy it if you're attracted to Whitehead's thinking and process philosophy in general :)
same
Profound way of world view,,,so true.these things are all mentioned in Torah and Bible and Quran.. Spirituality and imagination to see beyond the seen and see from your mind's eye the unseen as well❤❤
Whitehead sought to define what Aristotle demonstrated as meaningless, the continuous is not divisible: a line is not composed of points (dimensionless); time is not composed of 'nows'. 'Now' is not in time, having no dimension of duration, and would not be missed if subtracted from a 'second'. Hume and Kant ignored Aristotle, who can be the basis of cosmological thought that includes quantum reality by being fully true to his Categories, On Interpretation, etc.
Radical!
Interesting, important.
This is the tip of the information spear.
I do wish he got more into process and reality.
Piękne! Beautiful lecture :)
Define cosmology. In fact, provide definitions for all your terms.
Please someone tell me the name of this professor
Wonderful explanation ❤️
John B Cobb Jr. He's great, isn't he? 😉
Why is not whitehead more in our measure like sacred geometry !
i thought cosmology was about the big bang etc - never heard it was about humans
Are the course recordings available anywhere, if they were recorded?
Yes, you can sign up and access them here: cobb.institute/learning-lab/probing-process-and-reality/
I've come to abandon the moral and non-coersive assumptions that undergird process theology... but his vision of how reality works? The definitions? The hard parts? I've never seen a vision more brilliant than whiteheads.
What non-cohesive assumptions?
@@brynbstn non-coercive. As in, process theology is rooted in assumptions about God's method of divine intervention being totally non-coersive... and by non-coercive they mean, no overt applications of force that impose his will will anything sentient at all ever. Which rules out most miracle claims.
@@ravissary79 ohhhh. “Coercive”
@@brynbstn yeah I misspelled it by accident.
The 20th century GOAT imo
Is the course still open? I signed up for it yesterday and never got any email
Thanks for letting us know Dylan. I contacted Tripp, and he should be getting in touch soon. Please let us know (at cobb.institute/contact/) if you don't hear back within the next few days.
8:31 if we can't live in this planet or in the cosmos,we can colonise moon or mars or any planets,we just do same.
15:00
F.W.J. Schelling
Anand Veeraraj
Davis Sharon Rodriguez Lisa Hall Paul
An interesting lecture but failed to cover the subject title in any depth. The lecture should really be titled a lecture on cosmology, not the work of Whitehead.
do you want to see the cosmos ? DMT will show you in a way that no other thing can - don't be shy , give it a try !
I bet you're cool.
Dr. Cobb discusses psychedelics at some length in some interviews. Some searches should yield results.
Kant set Philosophy make at least 100 years! 😞
Here is the proof for the Construct theory:
Infinity = 1/x(change) + 1
This equation is God's mathematical name.
God's name in this equation reads: God's Mind Is Man Changed With God.
Breakdown: God's mind is infinite. In math this measure out as the set of infinity
In math (1/x) represents a fraction of a whole. Any child is a fraction of a parent and man according to the Bible is God's child. Therefore man is a fraction of God
Change in math is represented by the Greek letter (delta) and it denotes a difference of some kind.
Plus (+) in math means to combine or add something with something.
There is only one God. In math the number 1 means something or someone is complete and individual from all the rest.
Spelled out: God's Mind (Infinity) is (=) Man (1/x) Changed ( delta) With (+) God (1).
Scientific Method
Step 1 Observation: Math can deliver unbreakable truths such as 2+2 will always = 4
Step 2 Question: Do math and Divinity share a common truth?
Step 3 Hypothesis: If God exist He should be found in the house of mathematics
Step 4 Prediction: God's Mind Is Man Change With God is an equation
Step 5 Test: Any number (Infinity) is (=) a set in space (1/x) that change (x^2) with (+) space (1))
Again: All and any number is a set in space that change with space
Note: "X" describes any set, (1) describes any kind of space physical or otherwise
This equation tells us why 2 feet is not the same as 2 inches. Both distances are measured out as 2 units of space but there is a change or difference between both units. They are each sets in a space of distance but they represent changes in their measurement of distance.
Step 6 Iterate: New look at what makes up reality. Reality consist of 3 domains of space
a. Fractured space or matter b. spatial expansion or energy c. Complete or unbroken space or the whole of knowledge a.k.a. information
Step 7 Conclusion: We now know Infinity is real therefore the value in enumeration demand God exist otherwise the domain for enumeration would be incomplete. We know the domain for enumeration is complete because we can count. God must be able to count too all the way to Infinity because His mathematical name tells us what is any number.
As we can see God is fundamental in the cross between information and physical relationships
I wrote a research doc looking deeper into this matter. Anyone who wants a free copy can contact me at:
william.mabon@yahoo.com
God's Mind Is Man Changed With God
I just realised that Jordan Peterson is actually more of a cosmologist than anything else.
He's more of a charlatan than anything else.
he is very Whiteheadian in cosmological/metaphysical orientation.
also at general philosophical home with James, Peirce, Dewey...
value-realist/denounces scientific materialism as nihilistic & lacking any coherent description of teleological causation (final/formal causes); although he is highly inclusive of the scientific enterprise in his overall approach, as pertains to energy dynamics/ mathematical models as critical/relevant tools.
+
considers reality, most precisely, as a process of actualizing potential/possibilities... and that there are intuitive, archetypal forms that guide this process towards MORE GOOD, MORE BEAUTIFUL possibilities...
the parallels are there. he just isn't explicit about the idealism/possible panpsychism...
@@vasey6635 either I like you, or yoy carrying a card. Lijed what you wrote though. So why did JP end up with brain damage in your understanding ? What was the exact etiology of his most serious blow?
Jordan Peterson is to cosmology what farting in a bathtub is to champagne.
@@blakestewart7200 I laughed out loud!
Oh this is some Jesus stuff...
hilarious