THEY ACTUALLY DID IT!!! | Multiple Commander Bans Announced!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 236

  • @esconde9922
    @esconde9922 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    i feel sour on it cause banning the fast mana now feels way too late
    also feels lame to give sol ring ban immunity due to being iconic imo

    • @SoftwareNeos
      @SoftwareNeos 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      yeah. giving sol ring immunity is just stupid

    • @-8h-
      @-8h- 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I think that's a stupid reason to give it ban immunity, but also I don't think it should be banned. So it doesnt really matter to me

    • @m.robuhhsin6307
      @m.robuhhsin6307 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      They will lose money on a ton of precons!

  • @ThelordHayden34
    @ThelordHayden34 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    So jewled lotus is useless? That’s dumb.

    • @tompolikpapousek7589
      @tompolikpapousek7589 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I saw some fun legacy deck that use jeweled lotus with doubling cube.

    • @delailama736
      @delailama736 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's not useless, you can flip it upside down and use it as a token.

    • @tompolikpapousek7589
      @tompolikpapousek7589 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@delailama736 or when you dying of cold you can burn it (almost dont work but better then nothing if you have few hundred play set)

    • @8Smoker8
      @8Smoker8 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No, it was dumb to print it like that, and to buy it/chase it.

  • @Jascen
    @Jascen 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Reading comments on other videos looks like jeweled lotus is the one most people are upset about. Including me who just bought one 2 days ago and never got to play it.

    • @delailama736
      @delailama736 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I was upset about it but they just banned it, so I no longer need to be upset about it ruining games.

  • @ShooterMcKevin1
    @ShooterMcKevin1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    Reprint and add text to Jeweled Lotus and fix it retroactively (Cast only if total commander cost is 6 or more) This still allows high cost commanders to utilize it and commander tax to be softened once)

    • @froghermit9852
      @froghermit9852 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Why reprint the card with new text that is already banned. They should just make new cards (which they already do) that aren't freaking broken on day 1. They could make a new card called Jeweled Lotus Petal 🪷 or something that does what you were talking about.

    • @martinheraud1744
      @martinheraud1744 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      LMAO this will never work 😆😆

    • @The_Abhy
      @The_Abhy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I like your idea❤

    • @delailama736
      @delailama736 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lol. Why not go and find a creative, unique way to play your high-cost commander and actually enjoy the casual-ness of the commander format? Seems like a good time for people to give up net-decking and learning how to search on scryfall.

    • @kaleb2407
      @kaleb2407 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is actually super smart

  • @vakuzar
    @vakuzar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Jeweled lotus is the worst one, literally a useless card everywhere else on purpose
    Mana crypt hurts the most, was the ultimate booster chase for years

    • @DKODA97
      @DKODA97 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ehh its a card game, not a investment. Most people got years of play out of it. Decks will adapt, new cards and combo lines will emergency. But this does help the casual format at LGS, where people play fast mana and it can feel really unfair, and can be a form of price gateing

    • @GorrnLord
      @GorrnLord 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "booster chaser" youre a gambler, you dont care about the card, you care about hitting a jackpot.

    • @vakuzar
      @vakuzar 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GorrnLord Lol if no one cared about the card, it wouldn't be worth $$$.

    • @GorrnLord
      @GorrnLord 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vakuzar Missed the point so badly that it had to be intentional. explain it to me then how buying multiple booster boxes is a better use of money than just buying the $200 card besides the dopamine hit when you "win" by pulling it or any of the other higher value cards from the set.

  • @ShooterMcKevin1
    @ShooterMcKevin1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

    Also, cEDH needs to be its own format entirely. Different rules committee.

    • @sketcherzero
      @sketcherzero 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Really should split them. Different committee, different banlist. They’ll still be 99% the same in terms of available cards, but the mindset/playstyle of the two formats are totally different.

    • @bt5087
      @bt5087 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Agreed! Too many silly bans that are geared towards casual. When it's blatantly not...

    • @-8h-
      @-8h- 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, but any time this conversation is brought up, cEDH players get extremely whiny about it. Even though it needs to happen, they don't want separate lists for what ever reason.

    • @wchenful
      @wchenful 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Need to get rid of the whiny casual players first 😂 The only reason these bans exist is because there's a bunch of casual players who enjoy stomping on low-power decks, causing other casuals to whine about them.

    • @mr.mammuthusafricanavus8299
      @mr.mammuthusafricanavus8299 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      LOL I been saying this for the last few years. The Rules Committee is not keeping up on the current trends of EDH. There really needs to be Casual EDH RC and CEDH RC ban list :P

  • @lunarlight3131
    @lunarlight3131 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    "THEY" want it to be slower but pods/people and metas play how they play. their vision isn't what others are. they don't play cedh a lot so why step on other people's foots?

  • @andrueurbane7361
    @andrueurbane7361 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The most important thing about these bans isn't the specific cards... it is the message it sends to WotC. That said, I certainly empathize with anyone who spent a ton of money on these cards.

  • @riverofarrows7257
    @riverofarrows7257 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This makes me worried slightly for the future philosophy. I worry that the most powerful cedh cards dont see enough casual play for the RC to care, but the more balanced cedh cards DO see enough casual play to raise eyebrows, leading to bans that cut off the bottom of the cedh meta, leaving the top untouched, leading to more homogeny instead of less.
    If this ban was the same except dockside, I think people would be fine with it. Unfortunately dockside is, like you said, a good card holding together a lot more off meta decks.
    I think the banning of these cards shows a significant trend of the whole format moving more and more competitively. As more people begin to play commander and it becomes the flagship format, youll have more and more people who want to play to win, and build their decks the best they can be. EDH has such a large card pool you dont have to try very hard to do something broken. As more and more people discover more of those broken things and as wizards keeps printing powerful cards, the format will continue to speed up and power up.

  • @TedMattos
    @TedMattos 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    RC Members' LGS yesterday. "I wonder why this person just unloaded all of their Mana Crypts along with their Docksides. That's odd. Oh well, let's list them." LOL

  • @jcstaff1007
    @jcstaff1007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +25

    Rules Committee: “We heard you loud and clear…we’re banning Rhystic Study too.”

    • @martijnkate5535
      @martijnkate5535 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Do you pay the one?

    • @AuronCommander
      @AuronCommander 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That would be kinda hype though.

    • @davidchan3781
      @davidchan3781 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can you throw Smothering Tithe, Fierce Guardianship, Deflecting Swat, Cyclonic Rift, and tutors on the ban list next? Jokes aside, I run all of them spread across 10 decks, some have them, some don't. It is what it is and I'm probably ignoring the bans depending on playgroup.

    • @MortonFMurphy
      @MortonFMurphy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Frankly, this was what I thought was coming.

    • @jcstaff1007
      @jcstaff1007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@davidchan3781 i feel like smothering is a necessary evil. It, in my mind, pushes demand for enchantment removal in all colors, (red, black and blue can’t do it very well) and although it’s broken with wheels, it de-incentivizes wizards from making a wheeling commander in white +grixis.
      The rest can stay. Removal is removal and doesn’t necessarily advance the board, your position or win the game on their own.

  • @Gashnaw
    @Gashnaw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    Jeweled lotus was only playable in commander

    • @fiber1881
      @fiber1881 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No it's not. It is actually a really strong card in Vintage.

    • @Gashnaw
      @Gashnaw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@fiber1881 a format that doesmt have a commander...

    • @anthonybalista7421
      @anthonybalista7421 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @Gashnaw
      You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about. Vintage doesn’t use it because the commander text, it uses it because it’s a zero cost artifact.

    • @ShuffleHerci
      @ShuffleHerci 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The are Combos using Doubling Cube, the doubled Mana does not have the Commander-restriction.

    • @Gashnaw
      @Gashnaw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ShuffleHerci so you pay 3 mana to get 3 mana and you still can not use that original 3 mana on anything but a commander.

  • @ashleydaltonshelton9830
    @ashleydaltonshelton9830 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I’m pissed we need a cedh format where these cards are fine

  • @bobthor9647
    @bobthor9647 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Luckily Thassa’s Oracle combos are still legal for casual . See you at the casual tables

    • @DangerKennyB
      @DangerKennyB 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Make 'em eat Thoracle until they understand it's a people issue and NOT a power issue

  • @WayneAnonymous
    @WayneAnonymous 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    I feel like the fast mana thing really is something for a rule 0 conversation. I'm sorry, but there are so many things people dislike that it just feels abritrary and mean to punish those who play with fast mana. You know what I don't finde enjoyable? Coutnerspells. Should we ban all the counterspells now because they impede me on playing my stuff? No. I need to be a big boy and suck it up and play around them. My Greven, Predator Captain for example was only playable because I had Jeweled, Mana Crypt and Dockside in there. I need to be fast to have a chance at winning against 3 opponents. I can basically dissolve it now.

    • @The_Abhy
      @The_Abhy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      So now you still have rule 0 conversation as you said.
      I got banned mox opal and I dealt with it. I got pissed and stop playing modern all together. But when I look back in time, It was a right choice for format. (But banning card made for commander like lotus was without warning stupid).

    • @derrickpaulson3093
      @derrickpaulson3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rule zero conversations are all that is needed outside of tournament play. No RC required if players can communicate the power level of the game you want. Example: “do you run fast mana like Mana Crypt?” “Yes I am playing a more competitive cedh deck.” “Cool, but I’m really looking for a slower game.” “No worries, man.” The end.

  • @hanschristopherson8056
    @hanschristopherson8056 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    On cedh the RC has said that they only make decisions for casual and if cedh players want to curate cedh they could create their own rc

  • @kodybrinkman9614
    @kodybrinkman9614 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    It's fucking insane these bans are to slow the format down and they left thassa's oracle alone what a fucking joke

    • @D0012D13
      @D0012D13 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What's wrong with 2 mana win the game?

    • @GorrnLord
      @GorrnLord 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Oracle needs some set up, you argue that it is easy to set up. But it doesnt just auto win by itself. Meanwhile a turn 1 crypt and lotus costs nothing and catapults you several turns ahead from the beginning of the game. If its a game where not everyone has those cards then the people without them are massively behind with next to no way to catch up.

    • @D0012D13
      @D0012D13 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@GorrnLordby that logic lotus does nothing and mana crypt only kills you

    • @GorrnLord
      @GorrnLord 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@D0012D13 those cards are free and you should look up what the word logic means because you sorely misunderstood it. You can atleast counter oracle or consultation. you cant counter a turn one 0 cost.

  • @Dadylongarms
    @Dadylongarms 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    So what are the #2 cards behind each of these cards that will move into its spot? Interested.

  • @BloodSplatterArtist
    @BloodSplatterArtist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    What has two thumbs and is ignoring the entire ban list now...

    • @delailama736
      @delailama736 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      A sore loser? Time to quit net-decking and build your own decks with some original cards

    • @juergenkurz2000
      @juergenkurz2000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      I bought them all the last months for high price. I give a shit on this stupid ban

    • @BloodSplatterArtist
      @BloodSplatterArtist 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@delailama736 jealous poor? Time to stop banning other people's cards because you can't afford them?

    • @derrickpaulson3093
      @derrickpaulson3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@delailama736or someone who values their cards and enjoys the game. Troll much?

    • @delailama736
      @delailama736 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BloodSplatterArtist Lol. How do you get to poor from net-decking? Most poor people net-deck because they want the most synergistic deck with the least number of cards bought as possible.

  • @moby69
    @moby69 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I advocate for ignoring the RC. CEDH needs it's own banlist and regular EDH is a casual format and some random dude's cant' dictate what to play. Having a banlist is a stupid idea in EDH to begin with. That's what a rule zero conversation is for. As if I'll get beaten up next time i'll play at my LGS with Grim Monolith, LED, Mox Diamond and Timetwister stuff just because they are not banned. So the only place where a banlist takes place is in cEDH and there you will neither decrease its speed because so many fast mana options are still available nor improve deck diversity since those cards helped boost fringe Commanders.

  • @jkjackson91
    @jkjackson91 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Bro, how are you always “just getting out of the shower”?!

    • @Persy55
      @Persy55 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The amount of time I've had the same question 😂😂😂

    • @decktechsfordecks
      @decktechsfordecks  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      We wake up shower and TH-cam. I’m a simple man of routine. 😂

    • @brandonzacher5263
      @brandonzacher5263 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@decktechsfordeckswith nice hair bro

    • @jkjackson91
      @jkjackson91 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@decktechsfordecks love it! Lol

  • @Set666Abominae
    @Set666Abominae 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Accessibility is the most important factor of the longevity and healthiness of a game. Having $100+ cards that warp games to the extent these ones do is just flat out detrimental. I’m glad this step was taken, and think the rules committee need to go much further, taking Gaea’s Cradle, Mishra’s Workshop, original duals and a few more out of the format.
    I do think having a separate cedh ban list is a good idea to maintain the explosive gameplay some players want.

  • @diegorezi5760
    @diegorezi5760 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I was slowly proxying and selling my expensive stuff, dock was already gone but i still had 2 crypts...very sad for not rushing the process

  • @thorne5072
    @thorne5072 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “I don’t see how it benefits the meta” it shifts the meta. Now the only unfortunate part is that we don’t have a committee for cedh so we can’t adjust the meta further

  • @miomio1901
    @miomio1901 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i feel like the table is adjusting its powerlevel by itself by pregame discussion about it. the bans (especially rendering JL completely worthless??) was just random. if you wanna play slower games just have that talk before starting a game and when somebody still plays lots of fast mana thats the person's fault and not the cards?

  • @itzDrexzyyy
    @itzDrexzyyy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I do kind of see why they wanted to ban these things, just wanting to slow things down and so on. But I do think it’s dumb that we just had 1 set with Jeweled lotus being a big chase card and another with mana crypt as a chase card, people have spent tons trying to pull them then in the same year they banned those cards after those people have spent all that money, I buy singles so that issue isn’t as bad for me but I feel bad for all the people who have spent all that money and been really happy they pulled the card .
    If cedh decided to make its own rules I’d probably be able to accept this ban because my cards will still be usable in that format, but with them currently being unusable alltogether it’s a bit grim, if they were cheap easy to get cards non of us would really care, but anyone who’s gone ahead and bought the cards for them to just become 2p chaff it’s pretty grim, I only just got back into magic this past year so iv only just found and bought these cards so for them to vanish practically right after I got them is preeeetty frustrating, I’m finally understanding the proxy debate and thinking I may have to join the proxy friendly group moving forward lol.

    • @GorrnLord
      @GorrnLord 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Those people are stupid gamblers for chasing. They could have just bought the card outright if they really wanted it. Those people WANTED to spend money to chase. Dont try to act like suddenly this makes that money wasted.

    • @itzDrexzyyy
      @itzDrexzyyy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GorrnLord well yeah I mentioned buying singles aswell because that’s how I got mine. But I know people who also pulled them packs recently, and it would be as simple as we’re at fnm and they grab a couple packs to try their luck, they finally got good luck yay, then got slapped with the ban straight after lol, whether that’s the way to go about getting one or not that’s still gonna feel shit, doesn’t matter if you bought it out right or got lucky with a pack that’s still a hype pull that you’d be happy to play then you then find out you can’t . I’m not saying anyone’s experience is worse than anyone else’s, I saw a pic of a guy that spent £7000 buying multiples of the singles , like it was shit for everyone lol. The only people it wasn’t shit for is proxy players and people that don’t play high power cards, and ya know lucky them and all that, doesn’t mean the rest of us can’t still a bit of sting from our most expensive cards we like playing being made useless , it’s all just opinions at the end of the day bud.

  • @juergenkurz2000
    @juergenkurz2000 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I give a shit about this Bans. Just bought this old cards this year. Stupid decision. Ordered my 4th mana crypt today for half the price than last month's.

  • @MonkeyPantsFace
    @MonkeyPantsFace 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I wonder if this will make Mana Crypt price finally drop 🤔

    • @ShooterMcKevin1
      @ShooterMcKevin1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      A LCI special guests sold for $75 today on TCG. It's a bloodbath. lol

    • @Blacklodge_Willy
      @Blacklodge_Willy 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yes, but who's buying?

    • @llAlukall
      @llAlukall 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Prices are massively dropping right now, yes. Except for the super rare versions like the Neon Ink foils.

  • @-8h-
    @-8h- 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    This may be an unpopular take: but banning dockside is dumb af.
    Nobody could make a case for banning a card thats dependent on how well your opponents are doing.
    Not that I would, but I'd sooner argue that smothering tithe should go before dockside.

    • @sfxlion5277
      @sfxlion5277 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Sounds like someone is just mad a op card got banned 🤣

    • @martinheraud1744
      @martinheraud1744 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Dockside comboes with 3 A/E on the field, very easy turn 3 in casual

    • @robertcarsten4050
      @robertcarsten4050 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I mean if it was just a single target players A/E but everyone having 1-2 A/E isn't exactly them "doing well"
      Seen way to many games get closed out of nowhere by a single dockside.

    • @TempRawr
      @TempRawr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      After all the recent clue/food/treasure dumps in recent set. He just had to die now, he was on edge before, now he is a monster guaranteed

    • @joshhill8894
      @joshhill8894 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I call Dockside “Baby’s first Combo” because it’s soooo easy to combo and out of nowhere too. Good riddance

  • @1859ddd
    @1859ddd 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The other main issue here is a member of the rules committee admitting communicating their plan with Wizards for this a YEAR ago. Do you know what that lines up with? Yeah, Commander Masters… So they knew that Jeweled Lotus and Mana Crypt were going to get thrown in the dumpster but because it was going to cost Wizards too much to fix and redesign two sets they went with releasing them anyway. That’s super bad in my opinion. CMM and LCI were two sets that people opened a LOT of going for the chase cards that are now banned. It’s just a really bad look on Wizards and the Rules Committee. The member of the Rules Committee really shouldn’t have even said anything but I’m glad he did. It just sets an incredibly ominous precedent. ANY powerful card that is only played in commander is now potentially on the chopping block to get financially ruined. It’s bad. It causes even more of a lack in faith in Wizards to somewhat respect the value of our collections. And it gives the rules committee incredible power. This sounds crazy but I’m really close to just selling my entire collection or at least the expensive staples. I have a lot of money in Magic. For example these bans didn’t just loose me 100s of dollars. I have at least 5copies of each of those three big staples. It lost me 1000s. When it impacts people financially is when I start to question the decision. Just think, many cards “accelerate” the game in much of the same way. Rhystic Study, Conc Sphinx, ANY TUTOR, Grim Monolith, Dark Rit, ect. You get my point. What the Rules Committee just did here puts ALL of these cards into question based on their philosophy of banning Mana Crypt, J-low, and Dockside. It’s not a good look guys.

  • @Produbtion
    @Produbtion 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I don't like the dockside ban. Rip mono red, ban that boring thassas and consul then

  • @UberElmo68
    @UberElmo68 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thing is, who are they to tell us how to build/play our decks. The whole "we think..." doesnt make sense. One group doesnt think for everyone. I did see Dockside ban coming from miles away, tho.

    • @trollingsoul3386
      @trollingsoul3386 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      they are people who made the game. But rule 0 exist so u do what u want with that info. its simple so stop crying

    • @ender4101
      @ender4101 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, they own the format and this is their vision for it. Bans are never unanimous, even when WotC does them.

    • @derrickpaulson3093
      @derrickpaulson3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Simple then, disband the RC. Wizards owns the game and can do that any time they want, like when the worst banning in the history of the game leads to the most loss of value ever seen in mtg card market. Just for example.

  • @MegaLalapala
    @MegaLalapala 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a Yu-Gi-Oh player seeing the crazy reaction to these bans is hilarious.

  • @hanschristopherson8056
    @hanschristopherson8056 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This is a great move for casual

  • @somegamer4071
    @somegamer4071 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm exclusively an EDH player, I've feared running into anyone who starts with these fast mana pieces, especially if they can bounce dockside. and I'm honestly fine with them banning them. I'd never pay to play them anyway.

  • @grimmlygr
    @grimmlygr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Its a good thing. They can now release weakened and tweaked versions of these cards, but these cards were too powerful and too expensive. Not healthy for the game.

    • @tidal_overdrive536
      @tidal_overdrive536 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s not a good thing for the people who owned these cards for years, now these cards are worthless

    • @SilverWolf89936
      @SilverWolf89936 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tidal_overdrive536stop whining 😂😂😂

    • @joshhill8894
      @joshhill8894 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@tidal_overdrive536boohoo. Folks shouldn’t be spending that much money on one card. They were busted and forced every other deck to speed up and play all the same expensive interaction just to keep up. And even then often times the dockside player still wins

    • @D0012D13
      @D0012D13 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@tidal_overdrive536they bought a card that they used for years. Do you get mad when you put 200k miles on a car and can't sell it for what you paid?

    • @derrickpaulson3093
      @derrickpaulson3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joshhill8894actually sounds like your whining because you took a knife to a gunfight. Have a pregame talk like a man and play a balanced game. Easy as pie.

  • @lemonamo
    @lemonamo 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wow no jewled lotus or dockside in krenko anymore... Definitely dropped its power level a degree or two

  • @BlackwoodCompany
    @BlackwoodCompany 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I'm for all four banned. Jeweled Lotus is broken as Black Lotus was. Nadu was banned as a commander in duel commander already. Dockside Extortinist was banned already in many formats. Mana Crypt had a bad history in MTG.

    • @derrickpaulson3093
      @derrickpaulson3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree for casual, but cedh is not the same thing. Two banlists would make everyone happy with literally no downside.

  • @cEDHNetwork
    @cEDHNetwork 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You said it bro, absolutely torn

  • @MonkeyPantsFace
    @MonkeyPantsFace 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +40

    Banning jewelled lotus is insane. It literally can only be played in commander. Way to go wasting my money out of nowhere

    • @henrytorr5810
      @henrytorr5810 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      Why should the rules committee consider the product viability and price of cards in a format where they are solely trying to cultivate what most players agree is the most fun way to play???

    • @DVS57REBEL
      @DVS57REBEL 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      I'm selling everything mtgs been dying for years.

    • @fizzyheart2486
      @fizzyheart2486 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      RC is there to balance the format, not keep your collections value. Play legacy

    • @-8h-
      @-8h- 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      ​@henrytorr5810 you can't just make a statement and say "that's what most players think" when you don't really know that. Even if you did, those people could choose not to use it, that's what I did.
      Besides, fun is subjective, and the RC tends to make terrible decisions.

    • @hanschristopherson8056
      @hanschristopherson8056 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The RC isn’t run by wotc so they don’t care lol

  • @richardsapingo1828
    @richardsapingo1828 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If i ever get to play with the RC, i will spam Orcale Consultation until they ban Oracle. That card has been a problem for all of its existence.

  • @Skyfysh
    @Skyfysh 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rule Zero > Rules Committee.

    • @joshhill8894
      @joshhill8894 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rule zero doesn’t work. People who spend the amount of money that these cards are worth are gonna play them regardless if people “rule zero” it.

    • @derrickpaulson3093
      @derrickpaulson3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joshhill8894sounds like you either don’t know how to communicate for a balanced game or give in to easily. I’ve never had an issue with asking my opponent how fast or powerful their deck is and either politely saying I need a slower game or pulling out a more competitive deck to match. It’s so so so simple.

  • @bt5087
    @bt5087 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cedh wants to be fast though. No one in cEDH is complaining about these cards... why would you want to slow down games when they want to win by Turn 4? Hmmmm...
    That jeweled Lotus though.... Hundred-dollar card reduced to zero😢

    • @-8h-
      @-8h- 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      cEDH took flash from us when RC said they won't ban around cEDH. So I'm assuming the trust is gone and people jump to conclusions.

  • @chicksandwich
    @chicksandwich 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Bruh. My mono-red main just gets destroyed at every turn. Why do I play this game?

  • @doku6255
    @doku6255 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m not a cedh player but I was wondering if the ban list ruins etali

  • @KeepTheKitLow
    @KeepTheKitLow 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Rip consumer confidence, taking an indefinite break

  • @conk2279
    @conk2279 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    🍿 dont mind me. Just salting my popcorn with all these comments.

  • @mjkuhnke
    @mjkuhnke 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It does feel like the cdh community at my lgs is just "find a dockside" -> "game over" in almost every deck.
    Not really any worse than all the "find a thoracle" but it does get kind of obnoxious so i am looking forward to a shake up.
    It's actually kind of funny how we have a guy that is just addicted to the most egregious card and he's still whining about paradox engine and doxkside ban started him on like a 6 hour long rant.
    I mostly play normal commander and really like these bans. We have a guy who just copies decks that beat him and sticks mana crypt and jeweled lotus in the to make them "better" so assuming that's a normal thing... Ridding the world of those guys is a blessing

  • @buddthi3090
    @buddthi3090 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really don't like this change, since (I feel like and think) these bannings only really benefit casual pods, where these cards don't really come up anyways. I feel like this just kills a lot of cEDH and also mainly high power decks. I feel like these cards plus free interaction and combos were the main line between casual and high power. With those out of the picture I think there will be many more high power decks in casual since they can't be differenciated that easily anymore.

  • @platinumangel7446
    @platinumangel7446 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great, break the format in two. Use a sideboard to swap a deck between the two. Seperate ban lists could power up and power down an deck like Korvold

  • @mr.mammuthusafricanavus8299
    @mr.mammuthusafricanavus8299 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    WOTC needs to print Jeweled Lotus in all pre-cons going forward LOL ;p

  • @thegamingnerd274
    @thegamingnerd274 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    As a partial cedh player, I don't mind the bans per se, but they're there and I'm fine with em. I would have rather seen Thoracle banned though

  • @thefacebehindthemask7007
    @thefacebehindthemask7007 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yet cards like Tabernacle, Oracle and Cradle are "fine"

  • @tomjueris9972
    @tomjueris9972 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    They never heard of rule 0

    • @tomjueris9972
      @tomjueris9972 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Liking the banns just not that i started half year ago and spent 400 euro on those 3 cards 2 months ago haha

    • @walrider8073
      @walrider8073 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rule 0 sucks. It works well at the kitchen table, not with random people.
      "Hey bro, would you mind putting 500 bucks worth of cards out of your deck? Thank you!"
      Rule 0 comes down to "Would you mind me playing proxies?" Or "Can i play this planeswalker as a commander?"

    • @tomjueris1619
      @tomjueris1619 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In any discord I have been playing, there are different tables for different power scalings. nything with fast mana like mana crypt and lotus was no being played under 8 and there was almost never any problem. Super easy to understand and ppl have generally more than 1 deck to play. Proxies are always allowed and no one cares if your deck is 100 bucks or 3k if it’s according to the pl we’re playing.

  • @xxocarina1430
    @xxocarina1430 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Great Banning of 24

  • @CarolinaKiara
    @CarolinaKiara 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I mean if you are making exceptions in the pod for banned cards then all banned cards get to be played, fastbond, that ramp titan etc

  • @ramuslatsman6944
    @ramuslatsman6944 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’m not sad for cEDH because it is such a meta specific competitive format. banning the best three cards in a competitive format rarely hurts the format. There’s always going to be a best-card-in-the-format and shaking up the format breathes new life into the format. Plus cEDH is so proxy friendly I’m hoping most people didn’t loose a ton of money on these bans. I owned one copy of each of these cards and I’m totally fine with the value of my single copies tanking for the overall health of the format. If you did invest your life savings in jeweled lotuses, sorry I guess…

  • @almondmilk5315
    @almondmilk5315 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I'm all for these bans. I came to play for the long term. It's not fun to win the game in 2-3 turns. This isn't Yu-Gi-Oh. If you want the game to end fast go play Yu-Gi-Oh. When I play and my opponent forfeits I don't enjoy it and sometimes I literally won't attack for multiple turns to see how it plays out whether I win or lose I just want to have fun.

    • @derrickpaulson3093
      @derrickpaulson3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Pregame discussion fixes and balances everything. If you don’t want a fast game, make it clear beforehand. Some of us like fast games and many of them. Why can’t we have both?

    • @almondmilk5315
      @almondmilk5315 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@derrickpaulson3093 Nah. I will literally scoop. I literally quit Yu-Gi-Oh because of the pace and negations. I didn't come to Magic to encounter the same thing. It's not fun. I've been doing a lot of research before the transfer and Magic was originally a slow paced game. Some people don't take time out of their day to go to their local store just for their games to be over in turn 2 or 3.

  • @LB_GOAT
    @LB_GOAT 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    We will also be banning all basic lands because games are to fast nowadays and its fast mana🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡

  • @joshhill8894
    @joshhill8894 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Rule zero would not work because who is actually gonna tell someone who spent that much money on their cards that they can’t play them. And the person who spent them isn’t gonna listen to rule zero either. Banning them is a good thing so the rest of us who don’t blow 200$ on a single card can play in a more balanced environment. I do think that Cedh should be its own thing so then folks who spent that much no matter how ridiculous it may be can still have their value intact and be able to play

  • @DangerKennyB
    @DangerKennyB 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Command Zone can fit more ads into longer videos.

  • @TedMattos
    @TedMattos 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Spoke with my playgroup. I said that my kitchen table isn't an LGS so none of these cards will be banned at my home.
    That being said, I'll toss a few extra mana rocks in my backpack in case I go to an LGS and need to swap out Dockside for one of them.

    • @SilverWolf89936
      @SilverWolf89936 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s a very important announcement, the whole world was worried about how you were gonna play your home games 😂😂😂

    • @derrickpaulson3093
      @derrickpaulson3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SilverWolf89936actually, it is absolutely good to hear how people will react to this nonsense. Anecdotal evidence is appreciated. I, too will be disregarding the nonsense of a ban.

  • @TommyNyholm
    @TommyNyholm หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sorry Im Late 😅 But I feel as a none CEDH player that these bans are Good. But I feel very Sorry for those people investing in those cards and see Them drop to 1/10 of its value 😢😢

  • @sable-eyesonixdragon8642
    @sable-eyesonixdragon8642 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm impressed, but this largely affects other players more than it does me. Since I play commanders with low cmc and/or cheat themselves out fast, manna going away solidifies Magda and Yuriko as the top-of-the-rung Commanders. My poor Edward deck will never know what a Dockside resolution feels like, but it will function all the same in mid-range. I slapped Nadu as commander for the Merfolk deck in case this happens. The good news is that I still have a fully functional person with some 0-cost equipment. Jeweled Lotus and Manna crypt are exactly the way I build my decks the way they are. I want to keep up with the fast manna players, and now I'm left outpacing them, but I don't feel great for other people at the store I go to or some members of my playgroup. They devoted a lot of time and money to these particular cards.

  • @Whitehalo117
    @Whitehalo117 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It's all BS, play interaction. You have 3 players to stop degeneracy of 1. Or rule zero...

  • @_sojourner_
    @_sojourner_ 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    For anyone that lost money. I'd like to share that Josh for the command zone (largest WOTC sponsored edh channel) is on the RC advisory board while being paid by WOTC. Imo, that's unethical and sets up a situation where an individual holds far too much power over the market.

    • @GorrnLord
      @GorrnLord 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nobody lost money. They still got what they decided to over pay for.

  • @jharrington2112
    @jharrington2112 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Proxie players "wtf my deck I paid $10 for got F'". Non proxie players "about time!"

  • @MachuMTG
    @MachuMTG 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I am apart of several different communities of various power levels. From low level flavorful jank, to top tier 100% proxy friendly CEDH.
    99% of the ppl I've heard from so far are not happy with this ban, and are going to continue playing all the cards (except Nadu. Most knew it was a problem, and seen the ban coming).
    The other 1% say they understand the ban, but also dont care if others continue to run them.

  • @Chriscross257.
    @Chriscross257. 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    For me personally. Watching a lot of Commander and play casual commander i bearly see those cards……
    Feels like they ban them to change cedh idk……
    Who knows really their explanation for the bans is interesting i guess…. Mb other people see those a lot more in casual i suppose

  • @brendan-kfp7.62mmminigun4
    @brendan-kfp7.62mmminigun4 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Haven't played cedh in a while, but Godo is going to need a lot of changes

  • @heroicbandit7239
    @heroicbandit7239 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My casual group all run these cards and to be honest, it was making Magic unfun for me. I love building creative decks and trying stuff and every game literally just felt like "Make something explosive happen before everyone else or lose." because it was just a race to someone's infinite combo. None of my decks could hang seriously and the idea of spending so much on 3 cards was absurd just for the sake of being a part of that race.

    • @joshhill8894
      @joshhill8894 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Agreed. I’m so glad these toxic cards are out. It’ll force people to build creatively now. Or at least a little more. I would target certain players in my group just because I knew they had dockside and I had to get them out first everytime or risk just getting demolished. Only because I didn’t play those sorts of cards. Now I don’t have to worry about it which is nice. And I don’t have to basically target this one player in particular anymore.

  • @MichelleNghi
    @MichelleNghi 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Ancient tomb the one ring safe for now rystic study to🎉😊

  • @bobthor9647
    @bobthor9647 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The rules committee has no idea what they’ve done - they certainly didn’t take into account the financial ruin this will bring . When is the last time a $180 card got banned it’s unbelievably stupid of them and very self righteous of them to think a slower format is better, and without any data to support any of their decisions such as how often these cards were played

    • @joshhill8894
      @joshhill8894 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Boo hoo. Maybe people shouldn’t spend 200$ on one card

    • @derrickpaulson3093
      @derrickpaulson3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@joshhill8894or maybe having the largest financial loss for players in the history of the game is a bad thing? Sorry, but just because you want to proxy or play cheap doesn’t mean your method is right.

    • @GorrnLord
      @GorrnLord 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      the self righteous are the people who think their collection value should impact the format. Sucks you wasted your money, im sure you played enough games to get youe value from it though.

    • @bobthor9647
      @bobthor9647 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@GorrnLord The RC should use data not feelings. How often did your games involve someone winning because of these cards ? 3%. 5% ? I never cast a Dockside outside of cedh, I only played crypt and Lotus in my high power decks, I’ve played them 3-5 times over the past 12 months, and it didn’t auto win me the game like Thassa’s Oracle does

    • @GorrnLord
      @GorrnLord 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@bobthor9647 ive played plenty of games at my lgs where only 1 or 2 players had those cards in their decks and many of those games, most of them even, that 1 or 2 players just ran away with it. Theyre free cost cards where the only draw back to playing them in every single deck is the physical cost of the cards.

  • @magiclover9346
    @magiclover9346 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I own all these and am happy to see them go. My playgroup had already banned them. For those not wishing to provide a bad experience for casuals. You should alse be happy. In my experience, rule 0 doesn't work with people you don't know on a personal basis.

    • @derrickpaulson3093
      @derrickpaulson3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Rule zero works unless people lie. If they lie, never play with them again or be more specific. Example: “do you run fast mana like mana crypt and want a fast game?” “No I’m looking for a casual game.” “Sounds good. Me too.” Done.

  • @8Smoker8
    @8Smoker8 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great bans.

  • @Atogatog-j9v
    @Atogatog-j9v 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    How the fuck are they banning jeweled lotus? You can't play it in any other format.

  • @bobthor9647
    @bobthor9647 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    A card that costs 0 isn’t the same as a card that costs 1 - being able to realize this is what separates casual
    Players from good players . And they’ve banned cards good players spent $500 or more on for no reason

  • @boose-clips1079
    @boose-clips1079 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They are big bans

  • @kevinkozlowski3958
    @kevinkozlowski3958 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They banned jeweled lotus soon as they sold the last stock of their commander masters boxes

  • @seanwechsler6783
    @seanwechsler6783 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    cedh players can always have rule 0 conversations before games and choose to allow these cards.

    • @derrickpaulson3093
      @derrickpaulson3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The problem is most tournaments for commander are cedh and they need to have uniformity in banlist. Casual tabletop edh does not.

  • @connerhil
    @connerhil 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    If you’re going to get rid of low cost ramp, get rid of all of it.

    • @8Smoker8
      @8Smoker8 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Some is better than none. These were the worst offenders.

  • @wchenful
    @wchenful 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Summary: a few casual players who enjoy stomping on weaker decks ruins things for the rest of us 😂

    • @bobthor9647
      @bobthor9647 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Actually the Rules Committee, aka The Command Zone cast , has ruined things

    • @beltfedweapon9967
      @beltfedweapon9967 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Brother, I couldn’t agree with you more. Talk about a consensus-building echo chamber of groupthink that is a shill for WoTC/Hasbro? Yup, that is The Command Zone.

    • @GorrnLord
      @GorrnLord 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These cards were anything but casual. You could build multiple entire decks, or you could just buy those 3 cards.

  • @sirloinstakes6946
    @sirloinstakes6946 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Waahhh waaaahhh!!

  • @bobthor9647
    @bobthor9647 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The rules committee has no idea what they’ve done - they certainly didn’t take into account the financial ruin this will bring . When is the last time a $180 card got banned it’s unbelievably stupid of them and very self righteous

    • @robertcarsten4050
      @robertcarsten4050 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Man why are you spamming this whinefest?

    • @TempRawr
      @TempRawr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Money is money and I'm sorry to hear people are struggling. But if your investment into these cards is that reliant on one format and one card it just silly. If these were 500 to 1000 plus cards I get it. But at 200 dollars minus these were just overinflated

    • @bobthor9647
      @bobthor9647 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@TempRawr people paid those prices or more for special versions and now have zero . Many stores just lost thousands

    • @MisterWebb
      @MisterWebb 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Tens of millions of dollars just got evaporated

    • @robertcarsten4050
      @robertcarsten4050 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@MisterWebb such is the nature of speculation

  • @frankthetank520
    @frankthetank520 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I love it only because I dont own any of these cards and can only imagine how upset the people who treat these cards like stocks knowing all these money cards are taking hits

    • @derrickpaulson3093
      @derrickpaulson3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sorry but it’s not like most of us have a hundred copies. Even one of these taking a hit is insane. This is the single largest loss to player faith and value to ever hit the game. Not a good thing.

  • @andersrolig
    @andersrolig 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    It's paradox engine on a card😂. What are you talking about?
    "Crazy shit"
    👎 From me

    • @-8h-
      @-8h- 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Someone has never seen Nadu in action.

    • @wchenful
      @wchenful 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      He means that it is a non-deterministic value engine which makes an average turn take ages to execute, cannot be shortcut/looped and is reasonably likely to fizzle out after using up 30 mins of game time.

  • @porty2097
    @porty2097 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Then they should get rid of mana vault. It all about the same thing.

    • @ThaMobstarr
      @ThaMobstarr 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Mana Vault is a colourless mana ritual.

    • @ShooterMcKevin1
      @ShooterMcKevin1 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      They wont until the fallout cycle is over. They only banned mana crypt now because LC of Ixalan cycle is over. Collector booster sales will fall of quite a bit more for those chases.
      Commander Masters will do the same thing.

    • @porty2097
      @porty2097 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It could also be they are butt hurt that they cost some much. So let’s ban the anything that destroys lands, or anything that has a 0 casting cost. It really seems like they just want more people to play which is great. But why band cards when we have rule zero for a reason. If your play group doesn’t want to play with those cards then that’s what you should do but why be a worse player (aka dumb yourself down) for other people. That seems like the other players need to build up to your level not the ladder.

    • @notapplicable6985
      @notapplicable6985 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@porty2097Not everyone has a rule zero, plenty of tournoments only use the official ban list

  • @walrider8073
    @walrider8073 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I feel sry for people who pulled one of these out of a booster and were rly happy about it.
    I am not sry for people who did buy a copy of each of these cards for every deck they own, treating them as an investment.
    Guys, you are buying cardboard. This is not the stock market.
    I also think that the majority of people does not doubt that these bans will have a positive impact on gameplay.

    • @derrickpaulson3093
      @derrickpaulson3093 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Sorry but one of the reasons I play edh is because unlike other formats it was supposedly the safest for investments (it is a “collectible” card game which implies value) and WOTC even broadcast that investments into big cards like mana crypt with so many reprints was safe. This stupid ban destroyed player faith in that.

    • @walrider8073
      @walrider8073 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@derrickpaulson3093 but every time a Reprint happens the value of your stuff goes down