Mass Battle: The US Air Force vs The Chinese Air Force & Navy (WarGames 150) | DCS

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 มิ.ย. 2024
  • We answer the viewer question whether or not the US Air Force could take on the Chinese Air Force & Navy. Our sim can not handle 3600 aircraft similtaneously, so we run a 1/10th scale proportional battle with 360 aircraft.
    PATREON: / grimreapers
    Mods: • Free DCS Mods
    0:00 Overview
    1:00 Research
    4:44 Scenario Details
    12:01 Predictions
    13:00 Battle!
    USEFUL LINKS
    GRIM REAPERS (TH-cam): / @grimreapers
    GRIM REAPERS 2 (TH-cam): / @grimreapers2
    GR PODCASTS: anchor.fm/grim-reapers
    DCS TUTORIALS: / @grimreapers
    DCS BUYERS GUIDES: • DCS World Module Quick...
    DONATE/SUPPORT GRIM REAPERS
    MERCHANDISE: www.redbubble.com/people/grme...
    PATREON monthly donations: / grimreapers
    PAYPAL one-off donations: www.paypal.me/GrimReapersDona...
    SOCIAL MEDIA
    WEBSITE: grimreapers.net/
    STREAM(Cap): / grimreaperscap
    FACEBOOK: / grimreapersgroup
    TWITTER: / grimreapers_
    DISCORD: / discord
    THANK YOU TO: Mission Makers, Admin, Staff, Helpers, Donators & Viewers(without which, this could not happen) xx
    #WarGames #GRWarGames #China #USAF #Su57 #J20 #F22 #F35 #F15EX #F16C #DCSQuestioned #GR #DCSWorld #Aviation #AviationGaming #FlightSimulators #Military #DCS #DCSWorld
  • เกม

ความคิดเห็น • 456

  • @grimreapers
    @grimreapers  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Chinese Air Force vs Russian Air Force: th-cam.com/video/vHO94A7x6v8/w-d-xo.html
    US Air Force vs Chinese Air Force th-cam.com/video/ngXvWALKi1w/w-d-xo.html
    US Air Force vs US Navy & Marine Corps: th-cam.com/video/OfThwhYC-WQ/w-d-xo.html

    • @sarttee
      @sarttee 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      so.. why did 4th gen fighters go in first and not the stealth fighters?

  • @carloschaves445
    @carloschaves445 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +241

    I certainly feel like a valued viewer

    • @moshmeary51
      @moshmeary51 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

      Viewerton*

    • @vapormissile
      @vapormissile 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ​@@moshmeary51I'm a value-added viewington from viewbieville. I graduated Viewgworts in Observinghampton.

    • @terpin86
      @terpin86 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      What about a valued humanoid?

    • @vapormissile
      @vapormissile 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@flashgordon6670 that might take a while. Everybody, get busy!

    • @vapormissile
      @vapormissile 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@flashgordon6670 well, if it's the Universe you're looking to for payback, I'd watch that plan. The bitch cooks her books, plus she's an actual witch.

  • @Fl-Pride
    @Fl-Pride 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

    So funny how the trolls will complain about so many things. Instead of just enjoying all the hard work that goes into the videos.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Welcome to my life...

  • @Maverick0451
    @Maverick0451 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    That was incredibly entertaining!!! My favorite moment was when Super Cap caught a J-20, an F-22, and an F-35 all-in one-shot dancing around in close quarters!! Brilliant stuff!! Hats off to Brandon, aka the Flying Dutchman for the excellent tactical flying staying low and popping up, especially early on before all the stealth American aircraft were on the scene!!

  • @hughmungus2760
    @hughmungus2760 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    what I think was happening was not only did F16s not carry enough missiles, but they were wasting them all on humans who were 'soaking up the aggro' by being very evasive directly under them.

  • @fonzmeal6165
    @fonzmeal6165 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    "hello valued viewers" has that soothing quality you'd find at the beginning of a "therapeutic mind journey" video. Best part of my day.

  • @kenhelmers2603
    @kenhelmers2603 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Fixing the F35 bug made a difference. Well done Cap, lots of work!

  • @MannsModelMoments
    @MannsModelMoments 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +17

    I'd like to see this fight again but with the reserve forces split proportionally through all the aircraft types so there would be stealth aircraft from the start on both sides as I think this would better represent the two sides availability of the airframes. Given that stealth made such an impact mid-game, I think this would probably change the overall dynamic

  • @bushweasel
    @bushweasel 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    This why we can't get enough of Cap and the Grim Reapers! Thank you for keeping us entertained.

  • @hoyahimsa
    @hoyahimsa 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    haha around 20:35 the j15 with no wings and the interjection "well if you go fast enough you don't need 'em"

  • @sampanyofella5832
    @sampanyofella5832 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    You give such a thrilling commentary Cap. These videos are always one of the most looked-forward-to events of my week.

  • @-Hardstyle-
    @-Hardstyle- 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    This was bloody awesome 👏
    F-22's screaming in like maniacs! Gun kills! Beautiful humans being cheeky! Carnage!
    Absolutely loved it.

  • @manjisaipoe517
    @manjisaipoe517 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Great fun Cap, no real issues today. Thank you to all the humans flying today, you make these so much more interesting. Peace.

  • @gail_blue
    @gail_blue 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Thanks for doing this! BTW I find Cap to be one of the friendliest voices on TH-cam.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      awww

    • @dexlab7539
      @dexlab7539 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Cap is the best part imo!!! Love him

    • @gail_blue
      @gail_blue 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@dexlab7539 Yep, they are all fun. And even if it causes me to pull my hair out, it's the best whenever something goes wrong.

  • @2o7o7dragon
    @2o7o7dragon 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Love watching the Raptors come in and have a good stomp! Was worried this was going to be a reupload of another fight I just saw yesterday, but then I saw the fuel tanks. Excellent fight guys!

  • @willthrill94
    @willthrill94 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    @15:30 well if you’re on top of current status quo, game theory would have that person understate their capabilities to create confusion and uncertainty for runners-up. If you’re a challenger to the top position then it would behoove that group to overstate their capabilities to create worry for the top guy

  • @toddbrewer683
    @toddbrewer683 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Damn Cap, you were on FIRE with the commentary tonight! Thanks!!!

  • @jamieaulbach5120
    @jamieaulbach5120 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    One thing that is not accurate is typical air to air for F16 is one AIM9X and the rest 120's. Same with 15.

  • @SeedOfElijah
    @SeedOfElijah 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nice catch up to even it up. That F-22 swooping in and smashing 3, like a movie.

  • @jokiejoker2011
    @jokiejoker2011 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great commentary Cap. Very well done. A Wimbledon announcer couldn’t do better!

  • @cygmoid
    @cygmoid 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That F22 gun run on the J20 was mad. Nice video Grim Reapers

  • @ryabow
    @ryabow 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    i love that you include the chinese naval aircraft, but none of the USMC or USN aircraft and yet we still have the numbers advantage

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      You don't need them.

  • @brandoncollins7053
    @brandoncollins7053 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The commentary on this video is hilarious

  • @ecbst6
    @ecbst6 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    That map looks like the strings on a serial killer investigation.
    Cool!

  • @LukeBunyip
    @LukeBunyip 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Cap et al. You all seem to be having a ball. Look forward to the next one

  • @hanrockabrand95
    @hanrockabrand95 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +16

    You might say the server was Super Bugged down. What kind of server setup would you need in order to run the kind of complex game you'd want to? And is that something you might crowdsource?

  • @Kevin-hb7yq
    @Kevin-hb7yq 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Amazing battle folks! Super cool!!

  • @djzoodude
    @djzoodude 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I would just like to note that this is literally every modernized warplane the Chinese have vs just the USAF. It's not including the Navy or the Marines, and the Chinese are still outnumbered. Really puts things into perspective.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      china doesn't have a global military empire so it doesn't need an airforce that large.

    • @djzoodude
      @djzoodude 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@hughmungus2760 If by that you mean China isn't a global superpower, then yes, you are correct.

    • @92HazelMocha
      @92HazelMocha 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Its definitely not. The J8's and JH7's were omitted and China's navy isn't aircraft focused like ours is so you can't really compare naval assets.

    • @djzoodude
      @djzoodude 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@92HazelMocha I feel like he gave a pretty good rationale for omitting the J-8s and J-7s. They are basically modified MiG-21s. They do, technically, make up the numbers shortfall, but in a fight like this they wouldn't be able to do much. The Chinese mostly use them as trainers and expendable recon aircraft.

    • @92HazelMocha
      @92HazelMocha 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​​​@@djzoodudeThey are *not* modified Mig21's. They're very very different aircraft, we're even getting a proper J8 module for DCS and the cockpit looks closer to an F16 than a Mig. And since they recently upgraded their J8 and JH7 inventory to be compatible with the SD10, they're far from trainer aircraft. Granted they'll eventually toss them in favor of J16's and J20's, but it would be like discounting Vipers just because we also have F35's.

  • @thefatefulforce8887
    @thefatefulforce8887 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Epic! Good job once again GR team!

  • @the3rdlung
    @the3rdlung 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have seriously learned so much from watching these videos

  • @strambino1
    @strambino1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Just for fun, I would like to see how the combined US Navy and Marine Corps air forces would do against the Chinese combined tactical Air Force.

    • @Aiede71
      @Aiede71 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yeah, if the PLA is getting their 60 PLAN fighters then the US should get 600+ USN & USMC Super Hornets & F-35s.

  • @iamno1864
    @iamno1864 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That was great..love the commentary

  • @trustbutverify485
    @trustbutverify485 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    In any fight like this, you should spawn in stealth first. They would get in, destroy aircraft at a high rate and reduce missile platforms. Thus the enemy can fire a lot fewer missiles at 4th Gen follow ons. This has a disproportionate effect on the outcome, as it should.

  • @JamesWellsIndiana
    @JamesWellsIndiana 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Why hold the stealth fighters back? Seems like if you LED with the stealth fighters, we would have the advantage because the Chinese would have had no targets to shoot at?

  • @Abdullahkhan00881
    @Abdullahkhan00881 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    why did you delete the original?

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nothing deleted, it's on GR2 channel.

    • @Abdullahkhan00881
      @Abdullahkhan00881 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@grimreapers ohhh ok

  • @piconano
    @piconano 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    That was an exciting war game.

  • @mrjankee25
    @mrjankee25 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    That was fun the f22 hero gun kill was awsome 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉

  • @patricktho6546
    @patricktho6546 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The F22's being super aggressive (prob just because of their faster speed) kinda very well fits the meme

  • @BarbosaUral
    @BarbosaUral 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    This viewington declares a draw. If not; an American pyrrhic victory. Scale it down to 5% and add SAMs and AWACs. Go for a tactical battle and victory to see what side prevails.

  • @dat_sauce_tho2194
    @dat_sauce_tho2194 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    That was a great fight, I would be interested in finding out why the f-16's weren't firing their amrams

  • @alexislim5510
    @alexislim5510 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I dont understand why f16 and f15ex go first? It suppose to be the f22 and f32 so the can direct the missile of f16 and f15 to the target enemy.

  • @Anarchy_420
    @Anarchy_420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    15:21 100% Cap!👍👍
    Btw i haven't watched yet and already happy with the changes you've made compared to The GR 2 channel Vid ;)

  • @briansboucher
    @briansboucher 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    best play by play ever...thanks mate

  • @gooseman_x
    @gooseman_x 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    Cap, are you seriously surprised that they’re so aggressive, even though they carry the name “Raptor”?😂

  • @moshmeary51
    @moshmeary51 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We should do a drinking game where we take a sip each time Cap says “USAF”
    Idk why it cracks me up so much you pronounce the acronym

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yup I'm a true Brit!

    • @moshmeary51
      @moshmeary51 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@grimreapers pang.

  • @Coopdaddy70
    @Coopdaddy70 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video. I wonder if the outcome would be very different if you started the stealth fighters on both sides first, as would be standard practice and then unleashed the lower-tiered aircraft into the fray. Thoughts?

  • @Patrician9000
    @Patrician9000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    What kind of server would you need access in order to field 3600 aircraft? And why haven't we crowdfunded this?

    • @Snowwie88
      @Snowwie88 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think DCS also is limited in how many CPU's it would utilize.

    • @92HazelMocha
      @92HazelMocha 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I've run missions with over 3600 ground vehicles and it only functions at 1/4 speed or slower, and ground units use an order of magnitude less cpu to run.

  • @johnfbm
    @johnfbm 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Needless to say after this battle Bangladesh became a world power with 4 piper cubs.

  • @waynesworldofsci-tech
    @waynesworldofsci-tech 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bloody beautiful.

  • @hurnn1543
    @hurnn1543 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    If the American side lead with their stealth it would have never even been close.

  • @elijahcrowe6817
    @elijahcrowe6817 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The F-22 is by far my favorite fighter of all time! Not just because it IS the best, but it's also just super badass😂

    • @dexlab7539
      @dexlab7539 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yup, and the balloon kill was worth the trillions spent on them 😂

  • @leninstimpy
    @leninstimpy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I don't volunteer to be a 4th gen fighter pilot.

  • @polarking888
    @polarking888 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We love being valued

  • @reghardmostert8425
    @reghardmostert8425 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great battle !! Felt like Blue humans where nowhere and thus the big losses🤔

  • @bendalton5221
    @bendalton5221 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    yeah the main unrealistic thing about this is it acts like a video game: units spawning and going in one at a time. I don't know about the Chinese, but the Americans would send planes in as flights, form up and then send a large group in all at once, and then they would volley fire: it's a lot harder for the enemy to avoid a massive fight of incoming missiles at the same time (think 48 jets firing two missiles each at the same time)

    • @lagrangewei
      @lagrangewei 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      if you weren't attack sure, but in a real war when your airfield is getting bomb would it really be wise?

    • @jamison884
      @jamison884 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@lagrangewei No one is sneaking up on a US air base and getting bombed without warning. But the poster is correct, the US, NATO, and pretty much every AF in the world (I believe) operates on the basis of multiples of either 2 or 4 jets. It's always an even number unless there's a last minutes reason (or in the case of actual combat...losses) that force an odd number of jets in a flight.
      Basically, DCS just isn't programmed to use the real-world advantages the US has. The most stealthy jets, top-quality electronic warfare, amazing training quality, more flight hours than virtually every other country, more hours on realistic simulators, top-quality sesnors/datalink/satellite/radar using the F-35 as a flying computer/router. Not all forces are created equal, except in DCS.

    • @bendalton5221
      @bendalton5221 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@jamison884 yep, and it doesn't't take into account tactics and doctrines. We would send in small groups of stealth planes first, knock out their airborne warning, then a large flight of planes firing multiple types of missiles from various ranges to mess up their formations, then a sneak attack flight of stealth aircraft right after that as the enemy reformed, then a last flight to achieve air superiority. With that last flight would come flights of HARM equipped planes and fighter bombers to go after air defenses and airfields, to get anything left on the ground, knock out there defenses and ability to respond. After that, focus would be on maintaining air superiority. No one does that better than us, thought the command and control aircraft we keep up. One of the sneakiest tactics we use is to volley off a flight of medium/long range missiles on passive mode. CC can vector the missiles in, enemy gets nothing on their warning sets. Last minute, they put the missile flight into active mode: the Chinese headsets would go ballistic with missile warning/missle lock, and the missiles would be at point blank range at this point (I serve AF '92-'98, saw things like this in action, pretty impressive)

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      in the real world they would have target discrimination as well instead of firing 10 missiles at the same dead guy.

    • @sweatybotfn9982
      @sweatybotfn9982 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      China would do the same. But with tactics. They have stealth aircraft but not as much as US so they wouldn’t go head to head with all of their aircrafts

  • @PhoenixCMDRAce
    @PhoenixCMDRAce 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Oh and A RAPTOR JOINS IN ASWELL!!! at 39:09 is so funny

  • @matthewellisor5835
    @matthewellisor5835 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    15:18
    Because inches>centimeters but we only brag in the pub or in semi-polite company.
    Lofted, it'll do about 140,000 cubits more than nameplate and the electrical supply is greater than needed for it's greatest conceivable range.
    Come on, we're the ones who turned retired artillery barrels into bunker Eff'you!s on the order of a few weeks, dropped tests (of one dummy and one filled with hate) and loaded the other two for the discontinuity-of-life for a few guys.
    Also, the world's second largest naval force (by tonnage) is our museum fleet and there are, at the least, 2.6 firearms for every man, woman and child (including undocumented aliens) in CONUS. We don't need to exaggerate.
    ;D

  • @Abdullahkhan00881
    @Abdullahkhan00881 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    also the J-20s can carry 4 external fuel tanks, if ur gonna give the f-35 and f22 tanks, give the j20 its fuel tanks

    • @rodneypayne4827
      @rodneypayne4827 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Maybe they are not modelled. It is a mod aircraft after all.

    • @DogmaFaucet
      @DogmaFaucet 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      In the previous run, the F-35s AIs all RTB'd before engaging. I think the tanks were added just to make the scenario work. I don't remember a similar problem with the J-20.

    • @hughmungus2760
      @hughmungus2760 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I dont think J20s running out of fuel was the problem. they carried too few missiles. Although in coming years its likely J20s will get an upgrade to increase their capacity to 8

    • @Abdullahkhan00881
      @Abdullahkhan00881 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@hughmungus2760 hmm yea j20s dont carry alot, i think the f35 only carried 4 but they updated it to carry 6 (i forgot if it was the f35 or f22)

    • @chg-vq6kg
      @chg-vq6kg 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The j20 is not a fighter but an interceptor, characterized by high speed and range, so there is no fuel shortage

  • @anthonyb5279
    @anthonyb5279 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Many OA-K1a's Have been delivered a long time ago. Most have gone to the DEA.

    • @anthonyb5279
      @anthonyb5279 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@calebjohnson6423 You would be surprised but yea I designed them spray Agent Orange on cocaine fields and blow up drug labs. Drug lords have Anti Aircraft systems it was designed to doge missiles. We did do dissimilar combat training because they also have fighter jets mostly Su-27. This plane is slow but is more maneuverable than any thing but a DR1 do NOT try and dogfight it. Its hard to Boom and zoom it too it can jink like nothing else in the world. The armor is CRAZY! way more than it needs. To date we have never lost a pilot.

  • @SALSASOULRECORDS
    @SALSASOULRECORDS 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Im having problems with my horas x56 ghost key pressing.
    Any tips how to solve this issue please?
    Many thanks for all your great videos.

  • @11ccom
    @11ccom 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Dam good stuff.

  • @ltitus8900
    @ltitus8900 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The advanced antiair systems on each get are not modeled correctly and, to make matters worse, the AI is not modeled to evade correctly and do not adjust to the threats in real time (in regards to evasion). Further more, the F15EX new missile warning and evasion systems are not modeled correctly. The only models in this sim that stood a chance to make a difference (and it showed clearly) is the PL missiles and stealth aircrafts. And the AI does not know how to maximize the stealth capabilities.

  • @Zalthook5048
    @Zalthook5048 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    So why are the F-22s and J-20s not going ahead 1st?

    • @benhertz9826
      @benhertz9826 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      yea, makes no sense sending in after the 4th gens

    • @ncjoker420
      @ncjoker420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I am sure this way made a much better video. The Raptors would punch a hole through, the 35s would be circling spawn, and by the time the 40% of 15/16s spawned, they would need to carry bombs.

    • @GageEakins
      @GageEakins 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@ncjoker420 Your comment made me laugh very hard. Yeah that would probably be the outcome.

  • @synchronicmindless
    @synchronicmindless 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Everytime I hear Brandon talking I keep thinking: Why is Nyck de Vries calling himself Brandon....

  • @manyminichin
    @manyminichin 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What does the number under the jets icon present when in map view?

  • @epicentertattoos
    @epicentertattoos 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thank you and f you. This has completely taken over my life. So good

  • @lllxlxii569
    @lllxlxii569 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Now Imagine if it was the navy marine and Air Force

    • @jamison884
      @jamison884 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yup, and a fair fight may even be the US Navy and USMC vs. the Chinese AF (without the USAF altogether). USN and USMC have roughly ~1,200 fighter capable aircraft, from F-35B/C, F-18C & E/F/G, AV-8. Once they have all of their F-35s delivered, they should have a combined 700+, granted that's awhile from now.

  • @TheGamingGeeksSwe
    @TheGamingGeeksSwe 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    i hope one day you could do this full scale

  • @spartan078ben
    @spartan078ben 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You would probably need a Cray Supercomputer to run this sim to scale.

  • @johnaikema1055
    @johnaikema1055 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    China has longer range missiles.
    longer range missiles allows for more kills on the initial wave which in tern reduces number of missiles wasted on soon to be dead targets for the second wave.
    it's a math thing.
    first kills make for a huge advantage in an equal RCS fight.
    the f16's with the small loadout should not have been the first to the fight.

  • @vector8877
    @vector8877 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

    I feel like something affecting the initial kills and losses before the stealth came in was the fact far more Americans were in the air than Chinese. There were far more Americans to kill than there were Chinese for them. Hence a lot of the AMRAAMs fired also went to waste and were concentrated on a few Chinese while there were far more people able to be killed for the Chinese.

    • @sweatybotfn9982
      @sweatybotfn9982 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That’s not how it works😂

  • @kaizv6918
    @kaizv6918 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    now we need USAF and Navy together

  • @mobilegamer8922
    @mobilegamer8922 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If playing on a gaming laptop, how do you switch between camera angles and views? Also between the camera and map?

  • @cuz129
    @cuz129 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That's sarcasm, by the way. Love it!

  • @maxplanck9055
    @maxplanck9055 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    When are the Americans going to decommission their b52 and a10 aircraft? At 50 years plus surely its own time?✌️♥️🇬🇧

    • @92HazelMocha
      @92HazelMocha 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      B52's at least not for another 20 to 30 years. They're still suitable for their job so no reason to get rid of them. Also they don't cost that much to maintain given their payload capacity so we get a lot of bang for the buck.
      The A10 on the other hand might go away. I remember before the JSF project matured, one of the goals was for it to eventually replace the A10, but they also said that about the F16 and that didn't happen either. Tbh the A10 is overrated and the prevalence of PGM's have made a platform like the F15E plainly superior for CAS. I wouldn't be surprised to see the A10 go in the next decade, but I don't have any real evidence to support that.

  • @ggravett
    @ggravett 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    And then there is still the US Navy and their fighters. TIL there are no F-18s in the US Airforce.

  • @GlitchyGamers18
    @GlitchyGamers18 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great wargame cap. One thing I’m curious with is why all the modded aircraft use the the same engine sound effects? Is it an engine limitation or have you guys just not gotten around to it

  • @romanschaub3790
    @romanschaub3790 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cap = best sport commentator!!

  • @xenaguy01
    @xenaguy01 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    25:45 Will the F-35s actually fight this time?

  • @CHLBUTTERWORTH
    @CHLBUTTERWORTH 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Does having the pylons on the F-22 and F-35 affect the RCS of them? They can eejct them to ge their RCS back to the level they had before external stores/fuel tanks

  • @zaneroskoph7460
    @zaneroskoph7460 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Seeing the F-22s charging in got me thinking: since the detection range is the limiting factor against 5th gen aircraft, in a 5th gen v. 5th gen fight, wouldn’t a load out favoring Fox 2s provide equal attack range while being lighter, cheaper, and harder to evade?

  • @TheJTcreate
    @TheJTcreate 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    well, in reality, the American Stealth fighters would have been a lot harder to hit with missiles, even with WVR. But definitely entertaining.

  • @ivorharden
    @ivorharden 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I vaguely remember commenting this what if scenario on another video

    • @pahtar7189
      @pahtar7189 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Me too. Deja vu? Mandela effect?

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is improved version with everything working.

  • @saintuk70
    @saintuk70 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you. #grimreapers

  • @NigelTufnel612
    @NigelTufnel612 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Does the software take into account variences in pilot training and combat experience, the lack of Chinese battle testing of planes and missiles, along with radar capability deficits?

  • @rastaboy_gamesnstuff7778
    @rastaboy_gamesnstuff7778 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Valued request to simulate the entirety using 10 allowed spawns, (9 respawns) for each craft. If possible.

  • @Anarchy_420
    @Anarchy_420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I personally liked the two wave scenario, its kinda more realistic that way, the battle would escalate, and logically more Planes would enter the battle plus the way you set it up was spot on as the more/mostly advanced Planes were in the second wave! Btw F-15EX looking very sexy!👍👍

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      However..... still looks like D3's are underperforming, seems like they have a drop lock problem, and especially in comparison :( which I certainly don't believe would be the case!

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      29:46 lol you already answered your question Cap the U.S. fired more missiles and are losing more Planes at the same time... answer is simple, it's the missiles... PL-15's are over performing while D3's are dropping locks like crazy, the evidence speaks for itself right there in that moment your mentioning😅

    • @pike100
      @pike100 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Anarchy, no, the most advanced planes would go in 1st. Then the 4th generation jets, loaded up as missile trucks, would come in behind the stealthy jets. Look at how the U.S. fought Desert Storm against Iraq - we sent in the F-117s and Wild Weasels first to make a safer path for our less sophisticated aircraft.

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pike100 Yeah but that was a real conflict with actual tactics, this involves essentially no tactics...

  • @BrOckSams0n
    @BrOckSams0n 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "front line capable" ... oh c'mon. let'em fight!

  • @Xerethane
    @Xerethane 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That was a fun one today, a great all out brawl. An idea for you: In the video "Army George Shows: What A Viable Chinese Invasion Of Taiwan Could Look Like (WarGames 148) | DCS" we see China successfully invade Taiwan and kill a carrier using its new missile tech and transports flying in behind in the wake. What would an American response look like? Lets say its a few weeks to a month or so later and fighting is continuing on Taiwan. The US wants to get in the fighting and start to squeeze China's economy. I think the next move would be the US shutting down the strait of Malacca and then a battle between the Chinese carrier and the small island bases it's made in the south China sea vs a much larger US force, probably consisting of 2+ carriers. Is that or something similar viable in DCS?

  • @Overthemountaim747
    @Overthemountaim747 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What super cap cpu is in use? That poor thing must be steaming after the last few months.

  • @CaptainSpacedOut
    @CaptainSpacedOut 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Raptor: LOOKS LIKE MEATS ON THE MENU BOYS

  • @raymondshaw5685
    @raymondshaw5685 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    wouldnt the Stealthy F-22 / F-35 combo have headed up this fight?

    • @toastrecon
      @toastrecon 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah. I mean, it's just for fun, but no way would they just send the F-16s in first one at a time as they took off.

    • @jestermarcus
      @jestermarcus 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I've been wondering the same. Wouldn't mind seeing the Stealths sent in first and then the 4th gens duke it out.

    • @GageEakins
      @GageEakins 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@jestermarcus Yes. the issue is their server just can't handle a fight this big so they need planes to die to keep the framerate stable.

  • @ReiMonCoH
    @ReiMonCoH 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That was cool.
    Do more if that👍🏻

  • @snowmochi1373
    @snowmochi1373 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wonder what adding ea-18g growler would do to this scenario. That’d be super interesting

  • @Maeyanie
    @Maeyanie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is this a reupload, Cap? I seem to remember hearing this briefing before.

    • @grimreapers
      @grimreapers  11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is improved version with everything working.

    • @Maeyanie
      @Maeyanie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@grimreapers Oh, okay, usually it's more obvious when you do that. Thanks for the answer. :)

  • @timwarren5021
    @timwarren5021 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    E-11 is not a C2 platform it is a comms relay platform only.

  • @brentgustafson5484
    @brentgustafson5484 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Cap, I got an idea but Idk if you will like it . Maybe do Grim reapers vs Growling Sidewinders or another channel that way if you have more humans in the fight the more accurate the results will be . Ik the history is a little bumpy but life is too short to dwell on the past. Either way because there isn't enough humans , you have stupid AI that shoot their missiles all at one target and after said target is destroyed the missiles de conflict and go dumb and it's a waste of ammunition. Great video as always !

  • @countbatculabrucetepes1959
    @countbatculabrucetepes1959 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If Cortana was piloting one of these f-22's my goodness the amount of kills😅

    • @pike100
      @pike100 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Count, same thing would be true for the people's champ, Simba. 😊

    • @countbatculabrucetepes1959
      @countbatculabrucetepes1959 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@pike100 Simba is masterful at notching missiles no doubt

  • @sweatybotfn9982
    @sweatybotfn9982 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Still impressed that J-11 could take down raptors

  • @Mace8388
    @Mace8388 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I think the US does that because of the old navy that boasted Japanese torpedos went not even a quarter of the distance they actually went which caused a lot of needless deaths early in the war